Multidimensional Assessment of Functional Outcomes in Schizophrenia: Results From QUALIFY, a Head-to-Head Trial of Aripiprazole Once-Monthly and Paliperidone Palmitate

Vocational rehabilitation in persons with mental illness in India: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Employment has a therapeutic impact, enhances community integration and improves the quality of life of persons with mental illness (PwMI). Vocational rehabilitation (VR) models must be sensitive to existing needs and resources. Several VR models have been tested in high income countries. Mapping different VR models in India would help both practitioners and policymakers.

AIM

The study aimed to comprehensively review VR models tested among PwMI in India.

METHODS

We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for Scoping Reviews. We included interventional studies, case studies and grey literature carried out for the VR of PwMI in India. The search was done in PubMed, PsychInfo, worldwide science and Web of Science. Google Scholar was used to supplement the search. A Boolean search using MeSH terms was carried out for the period January 2000 to December 2022.

RESULTS

A total of twelve studies (one feasibility study, four case studies, four institute-based intervention studies and two studies reporting NGOs' role) were included in the final synthesis. The studies included in the review were either quasi-experimental studies or case based. Types of VR included supported employment or place and train or train and place models, case management and prevocational skills training.

CONCLUSION

Limited studies exist on VR in PwMI from India. Most studies assessed a restricted set of outcomes. The experiences of NGOs should be published so that practical challenges can be understood. There is a need for public-private partnerships in designing and testing services and should involve all the stakeholders.

Subjective assessment of brexpiprazole in patients with schizophrenia: a prospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the subjective assessments of an antipsychotic treatment with brexpiprazole.

METHODS

This was a 14-week prospective observational study. Nineteen patients participated in the study between February 2019 and January 2020.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean age of 40.6±14.2 years and a Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) score of 4.6±1.2 at the initiation of brexpiprazole treatment. The Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptic drug treatment Short form, Japanese version (SWNS-J) total score significantly improved from 68.1±22.3 in week 2 to 79.5±21.0 in week 14 (p=0.0084). The SWNS-J subscales of self-control and social integration status also significantly improved from 14.0±4.7 and 13.9±6.0 in week 2 to 17.0±4.7 and 16.0±5.1 in week 14, respectively (p=0.0053 and 0.012, respectively). No significant improvements were observed in any other SWNS-J subscales or the Drug Attitude Inventory-10 (DAI-10) in the 14-week observation period. Moreover, the SWNS-J total score did not correlate with the DAI-10 (r=0.31, p=0.19), or CGI-S (r=-0.18, p=0.47) scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that brexpiprazole might improve subjective well-being, although this may not necessarily reflect psychopathological improvements. To enhance medication adherence, it is important to perform subjective assessments on patients over time.

Effectiveness and Safety of Switching from Oral Antipsychotics to Once-Monthly Paliperidone Palmitate (PP1M) in the Management of Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Considering the improvement in adherence and convenience, once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) has been increasingly used in the treatment of schizophrenia. However, the outcomes for patients who switch from oral antipsychotics (OAPs) to PP1M have not been reliably assessed. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of PP1M in the management of patients with schizophrenia with a prior history of OAP use.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library on 19 July 2022 to identify eligible studies. All studies that examined the effectiveness and safety of switching from OAPs to PP1M in patients with schizophrenia were included. The primary outcomes were relapse rate, hospitalisation rate, and the change from baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. The secondary outcomes included the changed number of inpatient visits, changed length of stay hospitalisation, change from baseline in the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score and the personal and social performance (PSP) total score, response rate, proportion of treatment discontinuation, and adverse events. We included randomised-controlled trials (RCTs), single-arm studies, and observational studies. Case reports, case series, and reviews were excluded. The quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB2), the 9-point Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) instrument for non-randomised studies and cohort studies, and the 12-item National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for before-after (Pre-Post) study without control group. Follow-up times were reported as short- (≤ 13 weeks), medium- (14-26 weeks), and long term (≥ 27 weeks). Data were pooled using meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies with a total of 4740 patients were included. The long-term relapse rates and hospitalisation rates were 12% (95% CI 0.07-0.18) and 18% (95% CI 0.15-0.20), respectively. The short-, medium-, and long-term change in PANSS total score was - 21.69 (95% CI - 30.02 to -13.36), - 14.98 (95% CI - 21.45 to - 8.51) and - 17.88 (95% CI - 31.94 to -3.82), respectively. Approximately 50% of patients reported at least a 30% reduction in the PANSS score at the short-term follow-up. Improvements in CGI-S and PSP score were observed during various periods. There was a reduction in the length of stay hospitalisation and the number of inpatient visits at the medium- and long-term follow-ups. Low discontinuation and adverse event rates were reported.

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, this study may support the efficacy and safety of switching from OAPs to PP1M for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Future large-scale studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Consideration of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics for Polypharmacy Regimen in the Treatment of Schizophrenia: Put It on the Table or Not?

Antipsychotic monotherapy (APM) is considered best-acceptable treatment option regardless of antipsychotic class and formulation types for treating schizophrenia. However, antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) has been also widely utilized in routine clinical practice. Despite APP has some clinical benefits it has also numerous pitfalls in relation with increased total number and doses of APs leading to adverse events as well as decrease of treatment adherence and persistence resulting in poor clinical outcomes. Recent introduction of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) to the market has offered a chance for better medication adherence/persistence and also provided a simplification of treatment regime leading to more stabilized treatment for schizophrenia patients. When we cannot stay away from APP in the treatment of schizophrenia, clinicians need to find more proper APP regimens and thereby utilization of APP in efficient way should be a practical strategy to benefit schizophrenia patient in a real world treatment setting. With this regard, LAIs can be one of available APP regimen for treatment of schizophrenia in routine practice since their clinical utility and pharmacokinetic stability over oral APs have been well-elaborated today. However, when we have to commence LAIs as a part of APP with oral APs or other LAIs, every effort should be made before doing so whether or not validated and available treatment options or other clinical factors were not done or evaluated yet. Any treatment guidelines do not support APP regardless of the formulation of APP regimen or address two or more LAIs for treatment of schizophrenia till today.

Clinical Benefit and Utility of Switching to Aripiprazole Once Monthly in Patients with Antipsychotic Polypharmacy or Long Acting Injectable Antipsychotics for Patients with Schizophrenia in Routine Practice: A Retrospective, Observation Study

Objective

In a number of controlled clinical trials and naturalistic studies, aripiprazole once monthly (AOM) has been found to be effective and safe as acute and maintenance treatment options for schizophrenia. However, such clinical data have been presented in selected patient population (i.e., antipsychotic monotherapy, etc.), in particular, clinical information on switching to AOM from antipsychotic polypharmacy and/or other long acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) has been scarce till today.

Methods

The study period was from the first switching day to AOM up to 12 months in patients with antipsychotic polypharmacy (APpoly)/LAIs (baseline, month 3, month 6, and month 12). Available demographics and clinical information were retrieved from electronic medical records (EMRs). Available scores of Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), Clinical Global Impression-Clinical Benefit (CGI-CB), CGI-severity, Visual Analog Scale on Satisfaction-Patient/Health Professional (VAS-P/HP), and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Insigh (PANSS-I) scores were also taken from EMR. Proportional change of functional impairment before and after AOM was also captured.

Results

Data of 18 patients were available. Most commonly used combined APs before AOM were aripiprazole, blonanserin, quetiapine, and risperidone. At least 2 APs (n = 2.4) were combined before AOM. Scores of GAF (10.7% increase), CGI-CB (46.2% decrease), VAS-P (47.8% increase), VAS-HP (40.8% increase), and PANSS-I (27.9% increase) (all p = 0.001) were significantly improved from baseline to month 12, respectively. Approximately 59% of patients improved individual functioning with different level (i.e., employment, back to school, etc.) after AOM treatment at month 12.

Conclusion

The present study have clearly shown the clinical benefit and utility of switching to AOM for treatment of patients with APpoly/LAIs in routine practice. Subsequent, adequately-powered, well-controlled clinical trials may be necessary to confirm our findings in near future.

Discovery research and development history of the dopamine D2 receptor partial agonists, aripiprazole and brexpiprazole

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. successfully developed the first dopamine D₂ receptor partial agonist approved for schizophrenia, the antipsychotic aripiprazole (Abilify^®). The drug was approved for this indication in the United States in 2002 and has received approval in the United States, Europe, Japan, and many other countries for several indications including schizophrenia, acute mania, adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), irritability associated with autistic disorder, and Tourette's disorder. Otsuka next developed brexpiprazole (Rexulti^®), another D₂ receptor partial agonist, which was granted marketing approval in the United States in 2015 as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder and for the treatment of schizophrenia. In Japan, brexpiprazole also received approval as a treatment for schizophrenia in 2018. In this review, we describe Otsuka's research history and achievements over the preceding 40 years in the area of antipsychotic drug discovery for dopamine D₂ receptor partial agonists.

“Dopamine‐system stabilizer” activity of aripiprazole.

Online Survey of Clinical Practice in Patients with Schizophrenia Treated with Long-Acting Injectable Aripiprazole or Paliperidone Palmitate

BACKGROUND

To obtain real-world evidence of functional improvements during atypical long-acting injectable (aLAI) therapy in recent-onset schizophrenia, an online survey was conducted to assess the impact of aripiprazole once-monthly injectable 400 mg (AOM 400; partial D₂ receptor agonist) and paliperidone palmitate once-monthly (PP1M; injectable, full D₂ receptor antagonist).

METHODS

Psychiatrists provided data for their 2 most recent AOM 400 patients, 2 most recent PP1M patients. Survey included 2000 patient cases (1000 AOM 400; 1000 PP1M). Eligible patients were aged 18-35 years, had been diagnosed with schizophrenia within 5 years, received AOM 400 or PP1M continuously for ≥6 months according to approved labels (mean durations: 1.6 and 1.7 years with AOM 400 and PP1M, respectively). Assessments included Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale, Personal and Social Performance Scale, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and Quality of Life Scale. GAF assessments were done retrospectively and also at the time of survey.

RESULTS

Baseline mean GAF scores were 43.3 and 43.8 for AOM 400 and PP1M, respectively, indicating serious symptoms/functional impairment in both groups. Mean improvements following AOM 400 and PP1M therapy were 19.7 and 16.3 points, respectively (final scores in mild functional impairment category). Other measures assessing symptoms/functionality/quality of life demonstrated the benefits of long-term aLAI therapy.

CONCLUSION

Schizophrenia patients with serious functional impairment prior to current aLAI treatment showed improvements in functional outcome after AOM 400 or PP1M therapy. These results suggest functional improvements with aLAIs are apparent not only in research but also real-world settings.

The use of long-acting Aripiprazole in a multi-center, prospective, uncontrolled, open-label, cohort study in Germany: a report on global assessment of functioning and the WHO wellbeing index

BACKGROUND

In this non-interventional study, the functionality and well-being of patients with schizophrenia with aripiprazole once-monthly (AOM) was evaluated under real-life conditions in a naturalistic population.

METHODS

This non-interventional, prospective, multicenter 6-month study included 242 predominantly symptomatically stable patients (mean age 43.1 ± 15.1 years, 55% male) who switched their treatment to AOM after 9.7 (± 22.3) months of oral treatment. Outcome parameters included functionality (Global Assessment of Functioning, GAF), patient's wellbeing (WHO-5 Well-Being Index, WHO-5), and both patient's and clinician's assessment of efficacy and tolerability of AOM. Treatment emergent adverse events (TRAE) were also recorded.

RESULTS

At baseline, the mean GAF score was 47.0 (±13.9), indicating that patients experienced serious impairment in functioning. A continuous increase to 60.2 (±17.0) during treatment was found, with a robust and significant increase already after 4 weeks. At study start, patients reported diminished wellbeing, with a mean score of 10.6 (±5.6) on the WHO-5 scale. During treatment, patient wellbeing increased continuously with strong and significant improvements even after 4 weeks and an overall improvement of 4.8 (±6.9) over the course of 6 months with an endpoint of 15.4 (±5.5). Stratification of these results showed that more pronounced effects were achieved in younger patients ≤35 years (p<0.05 for GAF). The effectiveness and tolerability of AOM was rated good/very good by most patients (89.2 and 93.7%) and physicians (91.4 and 96.8%). Only few TRAEs occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show a significant positive effect after initiation of AOM treatment in predominantly stable patients with schizophrenia on their functioning and wellbeing, which was even more pronounced in patients aged ≤35 years, thereby supporting previous randomized controlled findings under routine conditions in clinical practice.

Long-Acting Injections in Schizophrenia: a 3-Year Update on Randomized Controlled Trials Published January 2016-March 2019

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This study was conducted in order to review randomized controlled trial (RCT) data published January 2016-March 2019 on long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) for schizophrenia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Thirty-one RCTs (primary studies = 7; post hoc analyses = 24; n = 4738) compared LAIs vs. placebo (studies = 11, n = 1875), LAIs vs. oral antipsychotics (OAPs) (studies = 7, n = 658), and LAI vs. LAI (studies = 13, n = 2205). LAIs included two new formulations, aripiprazole lauroxil nanocrystal dispersion and subcutaneously injectable risperidone Perseris, as well as aripiprazole lauroxil, aripiprazole once-monthly, paliperidone once-monthly, paliperidone 3-monthly, and risperidone-LAI. Regarding prevention of relapse and hospitalization, LAIs consistently outperformed placebo, being partly superior to OAPs, without relevant LAI-LAI differences. LAIs were comparable to OAPs regarding all-cause discontinuation, functioning, quality of life, and tolerability, being associated with higher patient satisfaction and service engagement. Recent meta-analyses yielded mixed results, but never favoring OAPs over LAIs. In RCTs, LAIs are superior to placebo, but only in some aspects, superior to OAPs. Comparative effectiveness of LAIs vs. OAPs requires further study, ideally in generalizable/real-world samples.

Long-Acting Injectable (LAI) Aripiprazole Formulations in the Treatment of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Several second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are available in long-acting injectable (LAI) formulations.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the effects of the two formulations, Monohydrate and Lauroxil, of Aripiprazole LAI in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder during an acute episode or during maintenance treatment.

METHODS

On September 18, 2018, we adopted the following search strategy: (aripiprazole OR OPC-14597 OR Abilify) AND (long-acting OR depot OR LAI OR once monthly OR prolonged release OR monohydrate OR lauroxil) on PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science to identify randomised controlled trials. Furthermore, we searched the ClinicalTrials.gov site for possible additional studies.

RESULTS

We included 28 papers dealing with randomised assignment of aripiprazole LAI formulations in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in survival studies after stabilisation, in acute studies, and in head-to-head comparisons. Both monohydrate and lauroxil formulations reduced relapses/recurrences with respect to comparators (placebo or 50 mg once-monthly monohydrate) and improved symptomatology in acute schizophrenia.

LIMITATIONS

Only a small number of studies were included in our review, with widely overlapping samples. While a high proportion of studies were wholly or partly industry-sponsored, their outcomes do not appear to have been affected.

CONCLUSION

Aripiprazole LAI may to be efficacious in reducing relapse of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in the long term in stabilised patients and in improving symptoms of schizophrenia during its acute phase, with both monohydrate and lauroxil formulations showing efficacy.

Hummingbird Study: a study protocol for a multicentre exploratory trial to assess the acceptance and performance of a digital medicine system in adults with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or first-episode psychosis

INTRODUCTION

In patients with schizophrenia, medication adherence is important for relapse prevention, and effective adherence monitoring is essential for treatment planning. A digital medicine system (DMS) has been developed to objectively monitor patient adherence and support clinical decision making regarding treatment choices. This study assesses the acceptance and performance of the DMS in adults with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or first-episode psychosis and in healthcare professionals (HCPs).

METHODS/ANALYSIS

This is a multicentre, 8-week, single-arm, open-label pragmatic trial designed using coproduction methodology. The study will be conducted at five National Health Service Foundation Trusts in the UK. Patients 18-65 years old with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or first-episode psychosis will be eligible. HCPs (psychiatrists, care coordinators, nurses, pharmacists), researchers, information governance personnel, clinical commissioning groups and patients participated in the study design and coproduction. Intervention employed will be the DMS, an integrated system comprising an oral sensor tablet coencapsulated with an antipsychotic, non-medicated wearable patch, mobile application (app) and web-based dashboard. The coencapsulation product contains aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine or risperidone, as prescribed by the HCP, with a miniature ingestible event marker (IEM) in tablet. On ingestion, the IEM transmits a signal to the patch, which collects ingestion and physical activity data for processing on the patient's smartphone or tablet before transmission to a cloud-based server for viewing by patients, caregivers and HCPs on secure web portals or mobile apps.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval was granted by London - City and East Research Ethics Committee (REC ref no 18/LO/0128), and clinical trial authorisation was provided by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Written informed consent will be obtained from every participant. The trial will be compliant with the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03568500; EudraCT2017-004602-17; Pre-results.

Head-to-head comparison of 1-year aripiprazole long-acting injectable (LAI) versus paliperidone LAI in comorbid psychosis and substance use disorder: impact on clinical status, substance craving, and quality of life

BACKGROUND

To overcome nonadherence in patients with psychosis switch to long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic formulations is adopted. Most oral versus LAI comparisons showed similar antipsychotic responses. Psychoses often overlap with substance use disorder (SUD). Head-to-head LAI comparisons have hitherto focused only on non-comorbid populations.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare two LAIs, administered for 12 months, in initially hospitalized patients with psychosis comorbid with SUD in their clinical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Inpatients were recruited during 2016 and switched randomly to 400 mg intramuscular aripiprazole monohydrate (AM) (N=50) or to 100 mg intramuscular paliperidone palmitate (PP) once-monthly (N=51); patients were discharged and followed up for 12 months. Patients were rated at baseline and after 1 year through the Clinical Global Impression scale - severity (CGIs), substance craving intensity was rated through a visual analog scale for substance craving, and QoL through the World Health Organization (WHOQOL-BREF) scale. We addressed confounders with backward stepwise logistic regression and three-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

PP were older and had more cases of schizophrenia spectrum and less bipolar disorders than AM, but AM had a stronger craving for substances at baseline. Both LAIs were associated with significant improvements in all outcomes, with AM displaying stronger effect sizes than PP. The two groups did not differ on baseline WHOQOL-BREF scores in any domain, but at the 1-year follow-up, AM fared better on all domains. The two groups did not differ in final severity, but PP scored higher than AM in craving at the 1-year endpoint.Limitation: The CGIs is not a refined tool for severity and the substance craving may be subject to recall bias.

CONCLUSION

1-year AM and PP was followed by improved clinical status and QoL and reduced substance craving in a population with psychosis and SUD comorbidity. AM, compared to PP, improved craving and QoL at the 1-year follow-up.

Relationship between response to aripiprazole once-monthly and paliperidone palmitate on work readiness and functioning in schizophrenia: A post-hoc analysis of the QUALIFY study

Schizophrenia is a chronic disease with negative impact on patients' employment status and quality of life. This post-hoc analysis uses data from the QUALIFY study to elucidate the relationship between work readiness and health-related quality of life and functioning. QUALIFY was a 28-week, randomized study (NCT01795547) comparing the treatment effectiveness of aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg and paliperidone palmitate once-monthly using the Heinrichs-Carpenter Quality-of-Life Scale as the primary endpoint. Also, patients' capacity to work and work readiness (Yes/No) was assessed with the Work Readiness Questionnaire. We categorized patients, irrespective of treatment, by work readiness at baseline and week 28: No to Yes (n = 41), Yes to Yes (n = 49), or No at week 28 (n = 118). Quality-of-Life Scale total, domains, and item scores were assessed with a mixed model of repeated measures. Patients who shifted from No to Yes in work readiness showed robust improvements on Quality-of-Life Scale total scores, significantly greater than patients not ready to work at week 28 (least squares mean difference: 11.6±2.6, p<0.0001). Scores on Quality-of-Life Scale instrumental role domain and items therein-occupational role, work functioning, work levels, work satisfaction-significantly improved in patients shifting from No to Yes in work readiness (vs patients No at Week 28). Quality-of-Life Scale total scores also significantly predicted work readiness at week 28. Overall, these results highlight a strong association between improvements in health-related quality of life and work readiness, and suggest that increasing patients' capacity to work is an achievable and meaningful goal in the treatment of impaired functioning in schizophrenia.