Safety assessment of Brexpiprazole: Real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analysis adverse drug events (ADE) related to Brexpiprazole from the third quarter of 2015 to the first quarter of 2023 from FAERS database.

METHODS

The ADE data related to Brexpiprazole from 2015 Q3 to 2023 Q1 were collected. After standardizing the data, a variety of signal quantification techniques, including ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and MGPS were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 8559 ADE reports with Brexpiprazole as the primary suspected drug, 178 preferred terms (PT) of adverse reactions spanning 27 different system organ classes (SOC) were identified. Specifically, Metabolism and nutrition disorders and Reproductive system and breast disorders were unique adverse reactions to Brexpiprazole, with the latter not mentioned in the official drug label. Moreover, uncommon but significantly strong ADE signals, such as Egocentrism, Pharmacophobia, and Compulsions were observed. Notably, Tardive dyskinesia (n = 317, ROR 103.87, PRR 102.21, IC 6.21, EBGM 96.17) and Extrapyramidal disorder (n = 104, ROR 31.17, PRR 31.00, IC 4.57, EBGM 30.44) exhibited relatively high occurrence rates and signal strengths. Additionally, Lactation disorder (n = 6, ROR 48.09, PRR 48.07, IC 2.63, EBGM 46.71) and Breast discharge (n = 10, ROR 23.18, PRR 23.17, IC 2.94, EBGM 22.86) were observed, both presenting strong ADE signals.

CONCLUSION

Brexpiprazole poses risks of various adverse reactions while providing therapeutic effects. In clinical applications, practitioners should closely monitor occurrences of Psychiatric disorders, Metabolism and nutrition disorders, Reproductive system and breast disorders, and other events.

Guidelines for pharmacotherapy in Alzheimer's disease - A primer on FDA-approved drugs

The growing prevalence of dementia makes it important for us to better understand its pathophysiology and treatment modalities, to improve the quality of life of patients and caregivers. Alzheimer's disease (AD), a neurodegenerative disease, is the most common form of amnestic dementia in the geriatric population. Pathophysiology of AD is widely attributed to aggregation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques and hyperphosphorylation of tau proteins. Initial treatment modalities aimed to increase brain perfusion in a non-specific manner. Subsequent therapy focused on rectifying neurotransmitter imbalance in the brain. Newer drugs modify the progression of the disease by acting against aggregated Aβ plaques. However, not all drugs used in therapy of AD have been granted approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This review categorizes and summarizes the FDA-approved drugs in the treatment of AD in a manner that would make it a convenient reference for researchers and practicing physicians alike. Drugs that mitigate symptoms of dementia may be categorized into mitigators of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD), and mitigators of cognitive decline. BPSD mitigators include brexpiprazole, an atypical antipsychotic with a once-daily dosage suited to treat agitation in dementia patients, and suvorexant, an orexin receptor antagonist used to treat sleep disturbances. Cognitive decline mitigators include cholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine and glutamate inhibitors such as memantine. Donepezil is the most commonly prescribed drug. It is cheap, well-tolerated, and may be prescribed orally once daily, or as a transdermal patch once weekly. It increases ACh levels, enhances oligodendrocyte differentiation and also protects against Aβ toxicity. However, regular cardiac monitoring is required due to reports of cardiac conduction side effects. Rivastigmine requires a twice-daily oral dosage or once-daily replacement of transdermal patch. It has fewer cardiac side effects than donepezil, but local application-site reactions have been noted. Galantamine, in addition to improving cognitive symptoms in a short span of time, also delays the development of BPSDs and has minimal drug-drug interactions by virtue of having multiple metabolic pathways. However, cardiac conduction disturbances must be closely monitored for. Memantine, a glutamate regulator, acts as an anti-Parkinsonian agent and an antidepressant, in addition to improving cognition and neuroprotection, and requires a once-daily dosage in the form of immediate-release or sustained-release oral tablets. Disease-modifying drugs such as aducanumab and lecanemab reduce the Aβ burden. Both act by binding with fibrillary conformations of Aβ plaques in the brain. These drugs have a risk of causing amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, especially in persons with ApoE4 gene. Aducanumab is administered once every 4 weeks and lecanemab once every 2 weeks. The decision on the choice of the drug must be made after considering the availability of drug, compliance of patient (once-daily vs. multiple doses daily), cost, specific comorbidities, and the risk-benefit ratio for the particular patient. Other non-pharmacological treatment modalities must also be adopted to have a holistic approach toward the treatment of AD.

Subjective assessment of brexpiprazole in patients with schizophrenia: a prospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the subjective assessments of an antipsychotic treatment with brexpiprazole.

METHODS

This was a 14-week prospective observational study. Nineteen patients participated in the study between February 2019 and January 2020.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean age of 40.6±14.2 years and a Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) score of 4.6±1.2 at the initiation of brexpiprazole treatment. The Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptic drug treatment Short form, Japanese version (SWNS-J) total score significantly improved from 68.1±22.3 in week 2 to 79.5±21.0 in week 14 (p=0.0084). The SWNS-J subscales of self-control and social integration status also significantly improved from 14.0±4.7 and 13.9±6.0 in week 2 to 17.0±4.7 and 16.0±5.1 in week 14, respectively (p=0.0053 and 0.012, respectively). No significant improvements were observed in any other SWNS-J subscales or the Drug Attitude Inventory-10 (DAI-10) in the 14-week observation period. Moreover, the SWNS-J total score did not correlate with the DAI-10 (r=0.31, p=0.19), or CGI-S (r=-0.18, p=0.47) scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that brexpiprazole might improve subjective well-being, although this may not necessarily reflect psychopathological improvements. To enhance medication adherence, it is important to perform subjective assessments on patients over time.

Creation of a ready-to-use brexpiprazole suspension and the inflammation-mediated pharmacokinetics by intramuscular administration

Brexpiprazole (BPZ), which is approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder, has the potential to meet diverse clinical needs. This study aimed to develop a long-acting injectable (LAI) formulation of BPZ that could provide sustained therapeutic benefits. A library of BPZ prodrugs was screened through esterification, and BPZ laurate (BPZL) was identified as an optimal candidate. To achieve stable aqueous suspensions, a pressure- and nozzle size-controlled microfluidization homogenizer was utilized. The pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles, considering dose and particle size modulation, were investigated following a single intramuscular injection in beagles and rats. BPZL treatment resulted in sustained plasma concentrations above the median effective concentration (EC₅₀) for 2∼3 weeks, without exhibiting an initial burst release. Histological examination of foreign body reaction (FBR) in rats revealed the morphological evolution of an inflammation-mediated drug depot, confirming the sustained release mechanism of BPZL. These findings provide strong support for the further development of a ready-to-use LAI suspension of BPZL, which could potentially enhance treatment outcomes, improve patient adherence, and address the clinical challenges associated with long-term regimens of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD).

Pharmacotherapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Antidepressants and Atypical Antipsychotics

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) affects one in three patients with major depressive disorder and is associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality. Studies of real-world practices suggest that antidepressant monotherapy continues to be the most widely used treatment after inadequate response to a first-line treatment. However, rates of remission with antidepressants in TRD are suboptimal. Atypical antipsychotics are the most widely studied augmentation agent and aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, quetiapine extended-release, and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination are approved for depression. Benefits of using atypical antipsychotics for TRD has to be weighted against their potential adverse events, such as weight gain, akathisia, and tardive dyskinesia.

Augmentation of Brexpiprazole fluorescence through photoinduced electron transfer inhibition for the sensitive spectrofluorimetric assay of pharmaceutical dosage forms and spiked human plasma: Application to content uniformity testing

Brexpiprazole (BRX) is a new antipsychotic drug that recently was used in the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychosis. The presence of benzothiophene ring in its chemical structure makes BRX naturally fluoresces. However, the native fluorescence of the drug was low in neutral or alkaline medium owing to the occurrence of photoinduced electron transfer (PET) from the nitrogen of the piperazine ring to the benzothiophene ring. Protonation of this nitrogen atom using sulfuric acid could efficiently block PET process and thus retaining the strong fluorescence of the compound. Accordingly, a straightforward, highly sensitive, fast and green spectrofluorimetric approach was established for BRX determination. In 1.0 M sulfuric acid solution, BRX exhibited significant native fluorescence measured at emission wavelength of 390 nm after excitation at 333 nm. ICH requirements were used to evaluate the method. The fluorescence intensity and BRX concentration were found to be correlated linearly within the range of 5-220 ng mL^-1 with a coefficient of correlation 0.9999. The limit of quantitation was 2.38 ng mL^-1 while limit of detection was 0.78 ng mL^-1. The developed approach was successfully used to analyze BRX in biological fluids and pharmaceutical dosage form. The suggested approach worked well when applied for testing the uniformity of content.

An exploratory database study of factors influencing the continuation of brexpiprazole treatment (prescription) in patients with schizophrenia using information from psychiatric electronic medical records processed with natural language processing

Using natural language processing (NLP) technology to analyze and organize textual information in psychiatric electronic medical records can identify undiscovered factors associated with treatment discontinuation. This study aimed to evaluate brexpiprazole treatment continuation rate and factors affecting brexpiprazole discontinuation using a database that employs the MENTAT® system with NLP technology. This retrospective observational study evaluated patients with schizophrenia who were newly initiated on brexpiprazole (April 18, 2018-May 15, 2020). The first prescriptions of brexpiprazole were followed up for 180 days. Factors associated with brexpiprazole discontinuation were assessed using structured and unstructured patient data (April 18, 2017-December 31, 2020). The analysis population comprised 515 patients; mean (standard deviation) age of patients was 48.0 (15.3) years, and 47.8 % were male. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the cumulative brexpiprazole continuation rate at 180 days was 29 % (estimate: 0.29; 95 % confidence interval, 0.25-0.33). Univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis identified 16 variables independently associated with brexpiprazole discontinuation. Multivariate analysis identified eight variables associated with treatment discontinuation: variables with hazard ratio <1 were the presence of physical complications, longer hospitalization duration, and maximum chlorpromazine-equivalent dose of antipsychotics of >200 to ≤400 mg/day vs ≤200 mg/day in the past year; variables with hazard ratio >1 were previous electroconvulsive therapy, availability of key contact person information, a history of crime committed/reported, increase in brexpiprazole dose to 2 mg in >28 days, and appearance/worsening of symptoms other than positive symptoms. In conclusion, we identified potential new factors that may be associated with brexpiprazole discontinuation, which may improve the treatment strategy and continuation rate in patients with schizophrenia.

A 2023 update on the advancements in the treatment of agitation in Alzheimer's disease

INTRODUCTION

Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) are associated with negative outcomes for patients and their care partners. Agitation is one of the most common and distressing NPS, yet we lack safe and effective treatment options. While nonpharmacologic interventions are considered first line treatment, these may not be effective or appropriate for every patient. Our current approaches to the pharmacologic treatment of agitation in AD consist of the off-label use of antipsychotics, sedative/hypnotics, anxiolytics, mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, NMDA receptor antagonists, and antidepressants. Despite their prevalent use, they have questionable efficacy and significant safety concerns.

AREAS COVERED

Advances in the understanding of neurobiological mechanisms of agitation have fueled recent clinical trials. This article is an update to our 2017 review. A comprehensive search of ClinicalTrials.gov was completed from January 2017 to June 2022 using the search terms "Alzheimer's Disease" and "Agitation". A subsequent scoping review was completed in PubMed and Google Scholar. Several agents were identified for promise in treating agitation, including: brexpiprazole, cannabinoids, dexmedetomidine, dextromethorphan, escitalopram, masupirdine, and prazosin.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical trials remain underway utilizing both novel and repurposed agents to address symptoms of agitation in AD. With increasing understanding of the neurobiological mechanisms that fuel the development of agitation in AD, the use of enhanced trial design and conduct, advanced statistical approaches, and accelerated pathways for regulatory approval, we are advancing closer to having safe and efficacious treatment options for agitation in AD.

Brexpiprazole prevents colitis-induced depressive-like behavior through myelination in the prefrontal cortex

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have higher rates of psychiatric pathology including depression. The dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-treated mice exhibit IBD- and depressive-like phenotypes. A disturbed intestinal environment causes a decrease in serotonin and abnormal myelination in the brain, along with depressive-like behavior in rodents. However, the involvement of these factors in DSS-induced depressive-like behavior in mice remains unclear. In this study, we examined whether myelin proteins in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampi were altered in DSS-treated mice, along with the changes in the serotonergic system in the PFC by western blotting and HPLC. The effects of brexpiprazole (Brx), a serotonin modulator, on DSS-induced depressive-like behavior using the tail-suspension test were evaluated. Subsequently, we investigated Brx's effects on the levels of myelin, nodal proteins, and neurotrophic molecules in the PFC with western blotting, and examined the altered node of Ranvier formation by immunohistochemistry. DSS-treated mice showed a reduction in myelin and nodal proteins, dysfunction of the serotonergic system, and impaired formation of the nodes of Ranvier in the PFC. Brx administration prevented the DSS-induced depressive-like behavior and demyelination in the PFC. However, the Brx-mediated effects were inhibited by the selective 5-HT_1A antagonist, WAY100635, or the selective TrkB antagonist, ANA-12. Brx decreased the phosphorylation of ERK, CREB, and TrkB along with the expression of BDNF in the PFC of DSS-treated mice. Moreover, the effects of Brx were blocked by WAY100635. These findings indicated that myelination regulated by the activation of the ERK1/2-CREB-BDNF-TrkB pathway in the PFC may be involved in mediating the antidepressant effects of Brx.

Synergistic anti-depressive effect of combination treatment of Brexpiprazole and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on forced swimming test in mice

AIM

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are used to treat major depressive disorder (MDD) and other psychiatric disorders (e.g., obsessive compulsive disorder, social anxiety disorder, and panic disorder). In MDD treatment, SSRIs do not show remission in approximately 30% of patients, indicating a need for a better treatment option. Forced swimming test (FST) is a behavioral assay to evaluate depression-like behavior and antidepressant efficacy in rodents. In the present study, we evaluated the combination effect of brexpiprazole with SSRIs on FST in mice, in order to investigate their synergistic effect.

METHODS

Brexpiprazole (0.003 mg/kg) was intraperitoneally injected to mice 15 min before testing. Escitalopram (10 mg/kg), fluoxetine (75 mg/kg), paroxetine (10 mg/kg), or sertraline (15 mg/kg) were orally administered to mice 60 min before testing. Then, the mice were placed in water and immobility time was measured. Data from animals treated with escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline were pooled as SSRI-treated group data.

RESULTS

Combination treatment of brexpiprazole with SSRIs reduced immobility time in FST more than vehicle or each single treatment. A significant interaction effect was confirmed in the combination of brexpiprazole and SSRIs (p = 0.0411).

CONCLUSION

Efficacy of adjunctive brexpiprazole has already been demonstrated in clinical trials in MDD patients not adequately responding to antidepressants including escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline. The synergistic antidepressant-like effect of brexpiprazole with SSRIs found in this study supports the already known clinical findings.

Agonistic properties of a series of psychotropic drugs at 5-HT(1A) receptors in rat and human brain membranes determined by [(35)S]GTPγS binding assay

BACKGROUND

Many psychoactive compounds have been developed to have more beneficial clinical efficacy than conventional drugs by adding agonistic action at 5-HT_1A receptors. The aim of the present study was to evaluate several psychotropic drugs that had been reported to behave as an agonist at 5-HT_1A receptor (aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, asenapine, lurasidone, and vortioxetine) in both rat and postmortem human brain membranes.

METHODS

The [³⁵S]GTPγS binding assay for G_i/o proteins coupled with 5-HT_1A receptors was performed in rat brain membranes and postmortem human brain membranes.

RESULTS

The specific binding was stimulated by brexpiprazole in rat hippocampus, human hippocampus, and human prefrontal cortex. Aripiprazole also behaved as an agonist in the same brain regions. Interestingly, its potency was much higher in rat hippocampal membranes than in human brain membranes, indicating the possibility of species differences. Although vortioxetine was an efficacious stimulator at high concentrations, its potency was undeterminable because of a lack of saturability. In addition to 5-HT_1A receptor agonism, involvement of other components, e.g., 5-HT_1B receptor agonism, was speculated by the biphasic inhibitory effects of the selective 5-HT_1A receptor neutral antagonist. Negligible stimulatory effects were obtained as to lurasidone and asenapine.

CONCLUSIONS

Our previous studies have raised the concept of a psychoactive drug group with a common pharmacological mechanism of action, i.e., 5-HT_1A receptor agonism, consisting of perospirone, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, clozapine, quetiapine, nemonapride, and trazodone. The present study demonstrates the data indicating that brexpiprazole and probably vortioxetine are included in this drug group. Lurasidone and asenapine are excluded from this group.

Efficacy of adjunctive brexpiprazole on symptom clusters of major depressive disorder: A post hoc analysis of four clinical studies

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a clinically heterogenous condition and its treatment should be individualized according to the presence of particular symptom clusters. The aim of this pooled analysis was to investigate the effects of adjunctive brexpiprazole on different symptom clusters in MDD.

METHODS

Data were included from four similarly designed, short-term, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of adjunctive brexpiprazole in adults with MDD and inadequate response to 2-4 antidepressant treatments (ADTs), including 1 administered by investigators. Mean changes from baseline and Cohen's d effect sizes (ES) versus placebo were determined for the following Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale symptom clusters: core, anhedonia, dysphoria, retardation, vegetative, loss of interest, and lassitude.

RESULTS

Over 6 weeks, ADT + brexpiprazole 2 mg (n = 486) showed greater improvement than ADT + placebo (n = 585) for all symptom clusters: core (ES = 0.36; p < 0.0001), anhedonia (ES = 0.43; p < 0.0001), dysphoria (ES = 0.27; p < 0.0001), retardation (ES = 0.32; p < 0.0001), vegetative (ES = 0.29; p < 0.0001), loss of interest (ES = 0.30; p < 0.0001), and lassitude (ES = 0.33; p < 0.0001). Improvements of similar magnitude were observed for ADT + brexpiprazole 2-3 mg (n = 770) versus ADT + placebo (n = 788) (ES = 0.24-0.38; all clusters p < 0.0001). In most cases, improvement over ADT + placebo was observed from Week 1 onwards.

LIMITATIONS

Post hoc analysis with no adjunctive active comparator.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving adjunctive brexpiprazole versus adjunctive placebo showed improvements across a range of MDD symptom clusters. Improvements appeared early (generally from Week 1) and were maintained over 6 weeks. These data indicate that adjunctive brexpiprazole may benefit multiple subtypes of patient with MDD and inadequate response to ADTs.

Treatment Discontinuation Among Patients with Schizophrenia Treated with Brexpiprazole and Other Oral Atypical Antipsychotics in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study

Introduction

Treatment continuation is essential for relapse prevention in patients with schizophrenia. The aim of this exploratory study was to compare the time to treatment discontinuation between patients with schizophrenia prescribed brexpiprazole (BRX group) and those prescribed other atypical antipsychotics (OAA group) in clinical settings in Japan using health insurance claims data.

Methods

De-identified data of working individuals with schizophrenia aged < 75 years and their dependents were assessed from April 2017 to May 2020 using a nationwide claims database. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for baseline patient variables, were used to compare the time to treatment discontinuation (primary outcome) for 180 days between BRX and OAA groups and to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The cumulative treatment continuation rates at 180 days were also estimated. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted for the primary outcome.

Results

The analysis included 978 and 4898 patients in the BRX and OAA groups, respectively. Patients in the BRX group were significantly less likely to discontinue treatment than those in the OAA group (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78–0.95; p = 0.0024). The cumulative treatment continuation rates were higher in the BRX group (45.9%, 95% CI 42.5–49.2]) than in the OAA group (39.5%, 95% CI 38.1–41.0; log-rank test, p < 0.0001). Based on patients matched by propensity score, the BRX group was significantly less likely to discontinue treatment than the OAA group (log-rank test, p = 0.0466). Similar results were obtained in sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

Conclusion

This real-world study showed that patients in the BRX group were less likely to discontinue treatments than those in the OAA group. These findings suggest that BRX may contribute to treatment continuation among patients with schizophrenia.

Trial Registration

University hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000044682.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02252-9.

A case report of clozapine-treatment-resistant schizophrenia successfully managed with brexpiprazole combination therapy

Clozapine-resistant schizophrenia (CRS) occurs in 40%- 70% of clozapine-treated schizophrenic patients. Hereby we describe a 20-year-old CRS subject with comorbid cannabinoid use disorder, successfully treated with clozapine-brexpiprazole combination, subsequently switched to clozapine plus long-acting injectable aripiprazole.

New and emerging treatments for schizophrenia: a narrative review of their pharmacology, efficacy and side effect profile relative to established antipsychotics

Schizophrenia is associated with substantial unmet needs, highlighting the necessity for new treatments. This narrative review compares the pharmacology, clinical trial data and tolerability of novel medications to representative antipsychotics. Cariprazine, brexpiprazole and brilaroxazine are partial dopamine agonists effective in acute relapse. Lumateperone (serotonin and dopamine receptor antagonist) additionally benefits asocial and depressive symptoms. F17464 (D3 antagonist and 5-HT1A partial agonist) has one positive phase II study. Lu AF35700 (dopamine and serotonin receptor antagonist) was tested in treatment-resistance with no positive results. Pimavanserin, roluperidone, ulotaront and xanomeline do not act directly on the D2 receptor at clinical doses. Initial studies indicate pimavanserin and roluperidone improve negative symptoms. Ulotaront and xanomeline showed efficacy for positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia in phase II trials. BI 409306, BI 425809 and MK-8189 target glutamatergic dysfunction in schizophrenia, though of these only BI 425809 showed efficacy. These medications largely have favourable cardiometabolic side-effect profiles. Overall, the novel pharmacology, clinical trial and tolerability data indicate these compounds are promising new additions to the therapeutic arsenal.

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive serotonin-dopamine activity modulators in major depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Serotonin dopamine activity modulators have been approved as an adjunctive treatment to antidepressants in patients with inadequate response. These drugs have been proposed to have a beneficial effect on cognition, sleep-related problems, and other affective symptoms in patients of depression. Previous studies have shown inconsistent evidence and have not reported a pooled effect of the two drugs of this class viz., aripiprazole and brexpiprazole. This meta-analysis evaluated the effect of augmentation with serotonin dopamine activity modulator (SDAM) drugs in patients with major depression. The meta-analysis protocol was made as per PRISMA-P guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Clinical Trial registry, EudraCT databases were searched with prespecified search terms. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using the meta package in R software. Fifteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. The random effects model analysis observed a pooled effect of 1.55 [95% CI 1.32-1.84; prediction interval: 0.95-2.55, z = 5.19 (p < 0.0001)] for remission between the SDAM and placebo groups. A pooled effect of 1.58 [95% CI 1.37-1.83; prediction interval: 1.00-2.51, z = 6.34 (p<0.0001)] for adverse events and 0.72 [95% CI 0.48-1.08) prediction interval: 0.46-1.12] [z = -1.58 (p = 0.113)] for serious adverse events was observed. No significant publication bias was noticed. The quality of the evidence was rated as high. Adjunct SDAM increased remission in patients and had no significant effect on serious adverse events compared to placebo. Therefore, we conclude that SDAM drugs can be an effective and safe antidepressant augmentation strategy in MDD patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Newer antipsychotics: Brexpiprazole, cariprazine, and lumateperone: A pledge or another unkept promise?

Antipsychotic agents are used for various indications in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Despite their proven roles in multiple conditions, the treatment-emergent side effects of antipsychotic medications, such as metabolic side effects, are often the limiting factor for their long-term and short-term uses. Moreover, antipsychotic medications are often criticized for being less effective in treating different disabling symptoms such as negative symptoms of schizophrenia. As a result, the search for safer and more efficacious antipsychotic agents is ongoing. Newer antipsychotic agents are gaining attention related to emerging efficacy and tolerability data in treating neuropsychiatric conditions. In this review, we attempt to appraise the scientific data on psychopharmacology, safety profile, and efficacy of the newer additions to the list of second-generation antipsychotics, namely brexpiprazole, cariprazine, and lumateperone. We conducted a selective review utilizing PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane databases to gather appropriate publications, keeping broad inclusion criteria. There were no restrictions on the age of the study population or the year of publication. We also cross-referenced articles and references to capture all existing studies. Our review of the current literature indicates that all three antipsychotic agents appear to be promising based on their short-term studies, while long-term studies remain limited. There is also a need for a head to head comparison between the newer antipsychotics with the other antipsychotic agents to ascertain if the newer agents are any better than the others.

Effects of adjunctive brexpiprazole on calmness and life engagement in major depressive disorder: post hoc analysis of patient-reported outcomes from clinical trial exit interviews

BACKGROUND

Though often overlooked, calming patients and increasing their life engagement are key factors in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). This study aimed to test the hypothesis that adjunctive brexpiprazole increases calmness and life engagement among patients with MDD, based on clinical trial exit interviews.

METHODS

This was a pooled analysis of exit interview data from three exploratory, open-label studies of adjunctive brexpiprazole 1-3 mg/day. The studies enrolled 105 outpatients with MDD (DSM-IV-TR criteria), a current depressive episode, and inadequate response to antidepressant treatment during the current episode. Patients were interviewed if they completed the end-of-treatment visit (Week 6 or Week 12, depending on the study). Exit interviews took the form of semi-structured telephone interviews in which patients were asked mostly qualitative questions about their symptoms prior to the start of the study, and about improvements they had noted during treatment. Interview transcripts were reviewed and codes were assigned to calmness and life engagement vocabulary, allowing aggregation of the frequency of improvement in various domains.

RESULTS

79.8% (83/104) of patients described improvements consistent with at least one calmness term, most commonly feeling less anxious (46.2%) or less irritable (44.2%). A four-domain concept of patient life engagement was developed in which 88.6% (93/105) of patients described improvements consistent with at least one domain, specifically, emotional (77.1%), physical (75.2%), social (41.9%), and/or cognitive (36.2%). Of the patients who described improvement in calmness, 96.4% (80/83) also described improvement in life engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of exit interview data suggests that patients were calmer and more engaged with life following treatment with adjunctive brexpiprazole. Thus, adjunctive brexpiprazole may provide a benefit on subjective patient outcomes in addition to the improvement in depressive symptoms shown by clinical rating scale data.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Data used in this post hoc analysis came from ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02012218, NCT02013531, NCT02013609.

New Antipsychotic Medications in the Last Decade

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the last ten years, the treatment of psychosis has seen a near explosion of creative development in both novel agents and new delivery modalities. The current review summarizes these developments over the past decade (2011-2020). We performed a systematic review utilizing PubMed and PsychInfo with the aim of identifying all the RCT and related analyses in adults with psychosis (schizophrenia and mania).

RECENT FINDINGS

We identified 11 significant developments: the introduction of new antipsychotics cariprazine, brexpiprazole, lumateperone, and pimavanserin; introduction of new delivery methods: subcutaneous long-acting risperidone, aripiprazole lauroxil, transdermal asenapine, and inhaled loxapine; and the introduction of new approaches such as olanzapine/samidorphan for olanzapine-associated weight gain, examination of the TAAR1 agonist SEP 363,856 as a test of concept, and the combination of Xanomeline/Trospium, an M₁ and M₄ muscarinic receptor agonist in conjunction with a peripheral anticholinergic. Last decade has seen a tremendous development in second-generation antipsychotics which provides unprecedented treatment options for clinicians in treating psychosis.

Do cariprazine and brexpiprazole cause impulse control symptoms? A case/non-case study

Aripiprazole has been associated with impulse control symptoms (ICS). Recently, two drugs with similar pharmacological features have become available: cariprazine and brexpiprazole. All of them interact with the D₃ receptor, which plays a role in cerebral circuits involved in reward pathways. The objective of this study was to analyze whether a disproportionate number of cases of ICS are reported for cariprazine or brexpiprazole in EudraVigilance. A case/non-case study was conducted to assess the association between ICS and these antipsychotics, calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs) from their respective approval date to Nov 17, 2020. First, cases involving cariprazine or brexpiprazole were compared with those involving all other drugs. Second, to reduce the risk of confounding by indication, the RORs for cariprazine and brexpiprazole were compared with other antipsychotics. Besides, to evaluate a possible notoriety bias, a sensitivity analysis excluding aripiprazole was performed. Seven cases of ICS were reported for cariprazine and another seven for brexpiprazole. The ROR for cariprazine was 28.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.4-59.8) and 33.4 (15.8-70.1) in the case of brexpiprazole. Nonetheless, this association disappeared for cariprazine when compared with other antipsychotics drugs. However, when excluding aripiprazole from the analysis, a safety signal emerged. Although our study is the first to suggest an association between cariprazine, brexpiprazole and ICS, these results should only be considered as exploratory in the context of safety signal detection. Further, well designed observational analytical studies will be needed to confirm these results.

In vitro evaluations for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions of a novel serotonin-dopamine activity modulator, brexpiprazole

Brexpiprazole, a serotonin-dopamine activity modulator, is indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia and also adjunctive therapy to antidepressants for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder. To determine the drug-drug interaction risk for cytochrome P450, and SLC and ABC transporters, brexpiprazole and its metabolite, DM-3411 were assessed in this in vitro investigation.Brexpiprazole exhibited weak inhibitory effects (IC₅₀ >13 μmol/L) on CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 activities, but had moderate inhibitor activity on CYP2B6 (IC₅₀ 8.19 μmol/L). The ratio of systemic unbound concentration (3.8 nmol/L) to the K_i value was sufficiently low. DM-3411 had comparable inhibitory potentials with brexpiprazole only for CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. The mRNA expressions of CYP1A2, CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 were not changed by the exposure of brexpiprazole to human hepatocytes.Brexpiprazole and DM-3411 exhibited weak or no inhibitory effects for hepatic and renal transporters (OATPs, OATs, OCTs, MATE1, and BSEP), except for MATE-2K (0.156 μmol/L of DM-3411), even for which the ratio to systemic unbound concentration (5.3 nmol/L) was sufficiently low.Brexpiprazole effected the functions of P-gp and BCRP with IC₅₀ values of 6.31 and 1.16 μmol/L, respectively, however, the pharmacokinetic alteration was not observed in the clinical concomitant study on P-gp and BCRP substrates.These in vitro data suggest that brexpiprazole is unlikely to cause clinically relevant drug interactions resulting from the effects on CYPs or transporters mediating the absorption, metabolism, and/or disposition of co-administered drugs.

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of brexpiprazole, a novel serotonin-dopamine activity modulator and its main metabolite in rat, monkey and human

The pharmacokinetics of brexpiprazole were investigated in the in vitro and in vivo.The total body clearance of brexpiprazole in rat and monkey was 2.32 and 0.326 L/h/kg, respectively, after intravenous administration, and oral availability was 13.6% and 31.0%, respectively. Dose-dependent exposures were observed at dose ranges between 1-30 mg/kg in the rat and 0.1-3 mg/kg in the monkey.Brexpiprazole distributed widely to body tissues, and V_d,z were 2.81 and 1.82 L/kg in rat and monkey, respectively. The serum protein binding of brexpiprazole was 99% or more in animals and human. Uniform distribution character among the species was suggested by a traditional animal scale-up method.A common main metabolite, DM-3411 was found in animals and humans in the metabolic reactions with the liver S9 fraction. CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 were predominantly involved in the metabolism.The affinity of DM-3411 for D₂ receptors was lower than that of brexpiprazole, and neither DM-3411 nor any metabolites with affinity other than M3 were detected in the brain, demonstrating that brexpiprazole is only involved in the pharmacological effects.Overall, brexpiprazole has a simple pharmacokinetic profile with good metabolic stability, linear kinetics, and no remarkable species differences with regard to metabolism and tissue distribution.

The action of aripiprazole and brexpiprazole at the receptor level in singultus

The hiccup (Latin singultus) is an involuntary periodic contraction of the diaphragm followed by glottic closure, which can be a rare side effect of aripiprazole. In contrast to the structurally closely related aripiprazole, brexpiprazole was not associated with this particular adverse drug reaction. Having two very similar drugs that differ in their ability to induce hiccups represents a unique opportunity to gain insight into the receptors involved in the pathophysiology of the symptom and differences in clinical effects between aripiprazole and brexpiprazole. The overlap between maneuvers used to terminate paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and those employed to terminate bouts of hiccups suggests that activation of efferent vagal fibers can be therapeutic in both instances. Recent work seems to support a pivotal role for serotonin receptors in such vagal activation. It is unlikely that a unique receptor-drug interaction could explain the different effects of the examined drugs on hiccup. The different effect is most likely the consequence of several smaller effects at more than one receptor. Brexpiprazole is a highly affine (potent) α_2C antagonist and, therefore, also an indirect 5-HT_1A agonist. In contrast, aripiprazole is a partial 5-HT_1A agonist (weak antagonist) and an HT₃ antagonist. Activation of 5-HT_1A receptors enhances vagal activity while HT₃ blockade reduces it. Vagus nerve activation is therapeutic for hiccups. A definitive answer continues to be elusive.

Chronobiologic parameter changes in patients with major depressive disorder and sleep disturbance treated with adjunctive brexpiprazole: An open-label, flexible-dose, exploratory substudy

BACKGROUND

Circadian rhythm disturbances have been reported in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Among these is an increased phase angle between peak cortisol concentration and dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO). The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in chronobiologic parameters of sleep in patients with MDD receiving adjunctive brexpiprazole.

METHODS

This was an interventional, multicenter, open-label, flexible-dose, exploratory study in patients with MDD and inadequate response to antidepressant treatment who were experiencing sleep disturbances. Patients received adjunctive brexpiprazole 2-3 mg/day for 8 weeks. Outcome measures included cortisol and melatonin levels, used to calculate phase angle, and the Biological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (BRIAN).

RESULTS

The mean (standard error) phase angle between peak cortisol and DLMO increased by 108 (61) minutes from baseline to Week 8 (n = 9). BRIAN Total score changed (improved) by -14.6 (4.6) points from baseline to Week 8 (n = 9). Change in phase angle and BRIAN Total score showed a moderate-to-high correlation (Pearson coefficient: 0.68; 95% confidence limits: 0.04, 0.93; p = 0.040).

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by its small sample size, and its single-arm, open-label design.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings provide a preliminary indication that the phase angle between peak cortisol and DLMO is of interest as a potential biomarker for depression and therapeutic response. Adjunctive brexpiprazole may represent a strategy for correcting circadian dysfunction in patients with MDD and inadequate response to antidepressant treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01942733.

An open-label, positron emission tomography study of the striatal D2/D3 receptor occupancy and pharmacokinetics of single-dose oral brexpiprazole in healthy participants

Purpose

The aim of this Phase 1, open-label, positron emission tomography (PET) study was to determine the degree of striatal D₂/D₃ receptor occupancy induced by the serotonin–dopamine activity modulator, brexpiprazole, at different single dose levels in the range 0.25–6 mg.

Methods

Occupancy was measured at 4 and 23.5 h post-dose using the D₂/D₃ receptor antagonist [¹¹C]raclopride. The pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of brexpiprazole were assessed in parallel.

Results

Fifteen healthy participants were enrolled (mean age 33.9 years; 93.3% male). Mean D₂/D₃ receptor occupancy in the putamen and caudate nucleus increased with brexpiprazole dose, leveled out at 77–88% with brexpiprazole 5 mg and 6 mg at 4 h post-dose, and remained at a similar level at 23.5 h post-dose (74–83%). Estimates of maximum obtainable receptor occupancy (O_max) were 89.2% for the putamen and 95.4% for the caudate nucleus; plasma concentrations predicted to provide 50% of O_max (EC₅₀) were 8.13 ng/mL and 7.75 ng/mL, respectively. Brexpiprazole area under the concentration–time curve (AUC_∞) and maximum plasma concentration (C_max) increased approximately proportional to dose. No notable subjective or objective adverse effects were observed in this cohort.

Conclusion

By extrapolating the observed single-dose D₂/D₃ receptor occupancy data in healthy participants, multiple doses of brexpiprazole 2 mg/day and above are expected to result in an efficacious brexpiprazole concentration, consistent with clinically active doses in schizophrenia and major depressive disorder.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00805454 December 9, 2008.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-03021-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Efficacy and safety of brexpiprazole in patients with schizophrenia presenting with severe symptoms: Post-hoc analysis of short- and long-term studies

BACKGROUND

The treatment of patients with severe schizophrenia symptoms can be complicated and expensive.

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of brexpiprazole in patients with schizophrenia presenting with severe symptoms.

METHODS

Data were pooled from three six-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies and two 52-week, open-label extension studies. In the short-term studies, 1405 patients received placebo or brexpiprazole 2-4 mg/day; 412 brexpiprazole-treated patients rolled over into the long-term studies and received brexpiprazole 1-4 mg/day. More severe symptoms were defined as a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Total score >95 (median score at baseline). Outcomes included change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Total and Personal and Social Performance scale scores.

RESULTS

Brexpiprazole improved Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Total score over 6 weeks among more severely ill patients, with a least squares mean difference versus placebo of -6.76 (95% confidence limits: -9.80, -3.72; p<0.0001; Cohen's d: 0.43). Brexpiprazole also improved Personal and Social Performance scale score over 6 weeks in more severely ill patients (least squares mean difference: 4.38; limits: 2.14, 6.62; p=0.0001; Cohen's d: 0.38). Improvement of functioning was greatest in the 'Self-care' domain, followed by 'Personal and social relationships'. Among less severely ill patients, brexpiprazole was superior to placebo on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Total and Personal and Social Performance scale at Week 6. Improvements were maintained over 58 weeks. No new safety or tolerability concerns were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Brexpiprazole is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for schizophrenia in patients with more severe, and less severe, symptoms.

brexpiprazole for acute schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

RATIONALE

What is the difference between aripiprazole and brexpiprazole?

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review, network meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluated the efficacy and safety/tolerability of aripiprazole and brexpiprazole for treating acute schizophrenia.

METHODS

We searched Scopus, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library from inception until May 22, 2019. The response rate was set as the primary outcome. Other outcomes were discontinuation rate and incidence of individual adverse events. The risk ratio (RR) and 95% credible interval (95%CrI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were identified (n = 3925). Response rates of both aripiprazole and brexpiprazole were superior to that of the placebo (RR [95%CrI]: aripiprazole = 0.84 [0.78, 0.92], brexpiprazole = 0.84 [0.77, 0.92]). Aripiprazole and brexpiprazole were associated with a lower incidence of all-cause discontinuation (0.80 [0.71, 0.89], 0.83 [0.72, 0.95]), adverse events (0.67 [0.47, 0.97], 0.64 [0.46, 0.94]), and inefficacy (0.56 [0.40, 0.77], 0.68 [0.48, 0.99]) compared with the placebo. Although brexpiprazole was associated with a lower incidence of schizophrenia as an adverse event compared with the placebo (0.57 [0.37, 0.85]), aripiprazole and brexpiprazole were associated with a higher incidence of weight gain compared with the placebo (2.12 [1.28, 3.68], 2.14 [1.35, 3.42]). No significant differences were found in other individual adverse events, such as somnolence, akathisia, extrapyramidal symptoms, and dizziness between aripiprazole or brexpiprazole and placebo. Any outcome between aripiprazole and brexpiprazole were not different.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in short-term efficacy and safety for acute schizophrenia were not apparent between aripiprazole and brexpiprazole. Future studies are warranted to evaluate whether there are differences in the long-term outcome between treatments.

Brexpiprazole Reduces Survivin and Reverses EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistance in Lung and Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Although epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently activated in lung and pancreatic cancers, the efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is limited. Recently, brexpiprazole, an antipsychotic drug, was reported to chemosensitize glioma cells to osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI, by suppressing survivin, an anti-apoptotic protein, but their combinational effects on lung and pancreatic cancers remain unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the combinational effects of brexpiprazole and osimertinib on lung and pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

YM155, a suppressor of survivin, siRNA, and immunoblot were used to examine the role of survivin in osimertinib-resistance. The effect of drugs on cell viability in vitro was examined by trypan blue staining. The in vivo effects of drugs on tumor growth were examined using a xenograft mouse model.

RESULTS

Brexpiprazole exerted combinational effects with osimertinib in vitro. Pharmacological and genetic suppression of survivin chemosensitized the cells to osimertinib. Moreover, the combination of brexpiprazole and osimertinib effectively suppressed tumor growth in a mouse xenograft model.

CONCLUSION

Brexpiprazole is a promising drug for lung and pancreatic cancer in combination with osimertinib.

Novel antipsychotics specificity profile: A clinically oriented review of lurasidone, brexpiprazole, cariprazine and lumateperone

Second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are effective options in the treatment of schizophrenia and mood disorders, each with characteristic efficacy and safety features. In order to optimize the balance between efficacy and side effects, it is of upmost importance to match compound specificity against patient clinical profile. As the number of SGAs increased, this review can assist physicians in the prescription of three novel SGAs already on the market, namely lurasidone, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, and lumateperone, which is in the approval phase for schizophrenia treatment at the FDA. Besides schizophrenia, EMA and/or FDA approved lurasidone for bipolar depression, brexpiprazole as augmentation in major depressive disorder and cariprazine for the acute treatment of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder. These new antipsychotics were developed with the aim of improving efficacy on negative and depressive symptoms and reducing metabolic and cardiovascular side effects compared to prior SGAs, while keeping the risk of extrapyramidal symptoms low. They succeeded quite well in containing these side effects, despite weight gain during acute treatment remains a possible concern for brexpiprazole, while cariprazine and lurasidone show higher risk of akathisia compared to placebo and other SGAs such as olanzapine. The available studies support the expected benefits on negative symptoms, cognitive dysfunction and depressive symptoms, while the overall effect on acute psychotic symptoms may be similar to other SGAs such as quetiapine, aripiprazole and ziprasidone. The discussed new antipsychotics represent useful therapeutic options but their efficacy and side effect profiles should be considered to personalize prescription.

A pilot study of brexpiprazole for bipolar depression

BACKGROUND

Past studies suggest that brexpiprazole is an effective adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder and schizophrenia; however, no studies have examined brexpiprazole for bipolar depression. In this study, we examined the effects of brexpiprazole on mood, cognition, and quality of life in outpatients with bipolar depression.

METHODS

Twenty-one adults with bipolar disorder (most recent episode depressed) and scoring at least a 25 on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) were recruited. Brexpiprazole was titrated up to 4 mg/day over the 8-week period. Depressive symptoms were measured using MADRS and Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-report (IDS-SR₃₀). Manic symptoms were measured using Young Mania Rating Scale, quality of life with the Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder (QOLBD), and cognition with Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Stroop Color Word Test, and Trail Making Test.

RESULTS

MADRS and IDS-SR₃₀ scores decreased from baseline at weeks 4 and 8. YMRS and cognitive scores did not change significantly. QOLBD scores increased from baseline to week 8.

LIMITATIONS

A limitation to this study is the open-label design.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effects of brexpiprazole on bipolar depression. We found a significant reduction in depressive symptoms and an increase in quality of life.

Changes in metabolic parameters and body weight in brexpiprazole-treated patients with acute schizophrenia: pooled analyses of phase 3 clinical studies

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of brexpiprazole on metabolic parameters and body weight in adults with schizophrenia, including clinically relevant sub-groups of patients, based on data from two pivotal phase 3 studies (NCT01393613; NCT01396421) and a long-term extension study (NCT01397786).

METHODS

The short-term studies were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose (2 and 4 mg/day), 6-week phase 3 studies. The long-term study was an open-label 52-week study, recruiting de novo patients and those completing either short-term study. Maximum exposure to brexpiprazole was 58 weeks. Fasting metabolic parameters and weight were measured throughout the studies. Metabolic values were characterized as normal, borderline, or high (cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose) and low or normal (HDL), using commonly reported thresholds. The incidences of all possible shifts in metabolic parameters were measured from baseline to any time post-baseline during the first 6 weeks, first 6 months, and last 6 months of treatment.

RESULTS

In short-term studies, the proportion of brexpiprazole-treated patients with unfavorable shifts in metabolic parameters was low and like that of placebo-treated patients; the incidence of these shifts was not dose-dependent. During both short- and long-term treatment, the incidence of unfavorable shifts with brexpiprazole was lower than that of favorable shifts. During short-term studies, the mean increase in body weight was 1.2 kg with brexpiprazole treatment and 0.2 kg with placebo. The mean increase in body weight during long-term treatment was 3.2 kg at week 58.

CONCLUSIONS

Brexpiprazole treatment was associated with moderate weight gain and small changes in metabolic parameters during both short- and long-term treatment.

Efficacy and safety of flexibly dosed brexpiprazole for the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder: a randomized, active-referenced, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brexpiprazole as adjunctive treatment in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and an inadequate response to prior antidepressant treatment (ADT).

METHODS

Patients with a current major depressive episode after prior treatment with 1-3 ADTs entered an 8- or 10-week prospective treatment phase in which they received double-blind placebo adjunct to open-label ADT. Inadequate responders were randomized (2:2:1) to brexpiprazole 2-3 mg/day, placebo, or quetiapine extended-release (XR) 150-300 mg/day, adjunct to the same ADT, for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline (randomization) to week 6 in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. The key secondary efficacy endpoint was the change in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) mean score.

RESULTS

Adjunctive brexpiprazole showed a greater improvement in MADRS total score than adjunctive placebo (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval] = -1.48 [-2.56, -0.39]; p = .0078), whereas adjunctive quetiapine XR did not separate from placebo (-0.30 [-1.63, 1.04]; p = .66). Adjunctive brexpiprazole failed to separate from placebo on the SDS mean score (-0.23 [-0.52, 0.07]; p = .13), but did improve functioning on two of the three SDS items (family life and social life). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events in patients receiving brexpiprazole were akathisia (6.1%), somnolence (5.6%), and headache (5.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive brexpiprazole 2-3 mg/day improved symptoms of depression compared with adjunctive placebo in patients with MDD and an inadequate response to ADTs, and was well tolerated with no unexpected side effects.

Efficacy of adjunctive brexpiprazole on the core symptoms of major depressive disorder: A post hoc analysis of two pooled clinical studies

BACKGROUND

Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who do not adequately respond to antidepressant treatment (ADT) may benefit from adjunctive atypical antipsychotics; however, certain agents target specific symptoms of depression and not the full syndrome. The aim of this analysis was to examine the effects of brexpiprazole, adjunct to ADT, on the core symptoms of MDD, defined using Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) items.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of data from two 6-week, randomized, double-blind studies of adjunctive brexpiprazole in patients with MDD and inadequate response to ADTs (n = 1056). Efficacy was assessed using the MADRS core symptom subscale (MADRS₆) and individual items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, lassitude, inability to feel, and pessimistic thoughts).

RESULTS

At Week 6, adjunctive brexpiprazole showed a greater effect than adjunctive placebo on the MADRS₆ (within-group Cohen's d effect sizes: brexpiprazole, 1.05; placebo, 0.71; p < 0.001 between groups) and on each of the six core symptoms (effect sizes: brexpiprazole, 0.64-0.94; placebo, 0.39-0.64; all p < 0.001). At Week 2, adjunctive brexpiprazole already showed a greater effect than adjunctive placebo on the MADRS₆, and on five of the core symptoms (all p < 0.01).

LIMITATIONS

This was a post hoc analysis of studies that were not designed for this purpose. Correction for multiple comparisons was not performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Brexpiprazole, as adjunct to ADT, produced a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement on the core symptoms of MDD. Brexpiprazole is thought to exert its effects in MDD by treating the core symptoms of the disease.

Adjunctive treatment with brexpiprazole and escitalopram reduces behavioral stress responses and increase hypothalamic NPY immunoreactivity in a rat model of PTSD-like symptoms

The study explored effects of brexpiprazole (partial D₂/5-HT_1A agonist, 5-HT_2A and α_1B/2C-adrenoceptor antagonist) in rats exposed to predator scent stress (PSS), a proposed model of PTSD-like phenotype. Brexpiprazole (3.0mg/kg, PO), escitalopram (5.0mg/kg, IP) and their combination were administered twice daily for 14 days, starting 14 days after exposure to PSS or sham-PSS, shortly after a situational stress reminder. One day after last treatment behavioral responsivity was assessed. Brexpiprazole+escitalopram-treated rats spent more time in open arms, entered open arms more often and exhibited a lower anxiety index in the elevated plus maze than vehicle-treated, PSS-exposed rats. Adjunct brexpiprazole+escitalopram treatment reduced startle amplitude, compared with vehicle-treated, PSS-exposed rats. Treatment with either drug alone did not attenuate anxiety-like behaviors following PSS exposure. Use of cut-off behavioral criteria confirmed that adjunct treatment shifted prevalence of PSS-exposed rats from extreme towards minimal behavioral responders. One day following behavioral tests, brains were prepared for immunohistochemical analysis of number of BDNF-positive cells and of NPY-positive cells/fibers. PSS exposure decreased BDNF levels in hippocampus, but this was not affected by drug treatments. PSS exposure decreased number of NPY positive cells/fibers in paraventricular and arcuate nuclei of hypothalamus. Adjunct treatment with brexpiprazole+escitalopram increased NPY in PSS- and sham-exposed rats. Treatment with brexpiprazole alone had no effects, while treatment with escitalopram alone increased NPY in the arcuate nucleus of PSS-exposed rats. In conclusion, treatment with brexpiprazole+escitalopram may be an effective intervention for the attenuation of PTSD-like stress responses, which in part may be mediated by activating NPY function.

Alterations in amino acid levels in mouse brain regions after adjunctive treatment of brexpiprazole with fluoxetine: comparison with (R)-ketamine

RATIONALE

Brexpiprazole, a serotonin-dopamine activity modulator, is approved in the USA as an adjunctive therapy to antidepressants for treating major depressive disorders. Similar to the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist ketamine, the combination of brexpiprazole and fluoxetine has demonstrated antidepressant-like effects in animal models of depression.

OBJECTIVES

The present study was conducted to examine whether the combination of brexpiprazole and fluoxetine could affect the tissue levels of amino acids [glutamate, glutamine, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), D-serine, L-serine, and glycine] that are associated with NMDAR neurotransmission.

METHODS

The tissue levels of amino acids in the frontal cortex, striatum, hippocampus, and cerebellum were measured after a single [or repeated (14 days)] oral administration of vehicle, fluoxetine (10 mg/kg), brexpiprazole (0.1 mg/kg), or a combination of the two drugs. Furthermore, we measured the tissue levels of amino acids after a single administration of the NMDAR antagonist (R)-ketamine.

RESULTS

A single injection of the combination of fluoxetine and brexpiprazole significantly increased GABA levels in the striatum, the D-serine/L-serine ratio in the frontal cortex, and the glycine/L-serine ratio in the hippocampus. A repeated administration of the combination significantly altered the tissue levels of amino acids in all regions. Interestingly, a repeated administration of the combination significantly decreased the D-serine/L-serine ratio in the frontal cortex, striatum, and hippocampus. In contrast, a single administration of (R)-ketamine significantly increased the D-serine/L-serine ratio in the frontal cortex.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggested that alterations in the tissue levels of these amino acids may be involved in the antidepressant-like effects of the combination of brexpiprazole and fluoxetine.

Brexpiprazole for the treatment of schizophrenia

INTRODUCTION

Limited efficacy on negative and cognitive symptoms and adverse effects of current antipsychotics raise the need of developing new antipsychotics. Brexpiprazole, a new antipsychotic drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in July 2015 for the treatment of schizophrenia, is a novel serotonin-dopamine receptor modulator with partial agonist activity at serotonin 1A (5-HT_1A) and D_2/3 receptors. Areas covered: We reviewed brexpiprazole related in vitro and in vivo studies, including phase II and phase III clinical trials in this article. Brexpiprazole showed significant improvement of psychotic symptoms for patients with schizophrenia in clinical trials. Most of the clinical trials demonstrated the antipsychotic effect of brexpiprazole using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) in acute schizophrenia patients, and found that higher doses (2-4 mg daily) of brexpiprazole had better outcomes. In short-term trials, brexpiprazole did not show benefit for cognitive function in 6 weeks. Insomnia, akathisia, headache, and agitation were the most frequently recorded adverse events. Expert commentary: Brexpiprazole showed better efficacy than placebo in acute phase of schizophrenia. Long-term studies are needed to investigate the efficacy of brexpiprazole for cognitive function as well as the strength and weakness of brexpiprazole among current antipsychotic drugs.

Involvement of presynaptic 5-HT1A receptors in the low propensity of brexpiprazole to induce extrapyramidal side effects in rats

Previous studies have shown that partial and full 5-HT_1A receptor agonists reduce antipsychotic-induced catalepsy. Consequently, some antipsychotics combining balanced efficacy between dopamine (DA) D₂ antagonism or partial agonism and 5-HT_1A receptor agonism have a low propensity to induce extrapyramidal side effects (EPS), as reflected by low cataleptogenic activity in rodents. In the present experiments, we attempted to explore the importance of pre- and postsynaptic 5-HT_1A agonistic properties of brexpiprazole and aripiprazole in the context of neurological side-effect liabilities. Additional measures of prefrontal cortical serotonin (5-HT) and DA levels using microdialysis were used to support that brexpiprazole has a preferential agonist effect on presynaptic 5-HT_1A receptors. Brexpiprazole (3.0 and 10mg/kg, p.o.) as well as aripiprazole (8.0 and 30mg/kg, p.o.) failed to induce catalepsy in rats. Brexpiprazole (10mg/kg, p.o.) significantly reduced the cataleptic response induced by haloperidol (0.63mg/kg, s.c.), while aripiprazole (1.0-100mg/kg, p.o.) failed to reverse the effect of haloperidol and only showed a numeric decrease at 10mg/kg, (p.o.). When 5-HT_1A receptors were blocked by the selective antagonist, WAY100635 (1.0mg/kg, s.c.), cataleptogenic properties of brexpiprazole (10mg/kg; p.o), but not aripiprazole (8.0 and 30mg/kg, p.o.) were unmasked. The ("biased") 5-HT_1A receptor agonists F15599 (postsynaptic preference) and F13714 (presynaptic preference) had differential effects on haloperidol-induced catalepsy: F13714 (0.16mg/kg, s.c.) counteracted catalepsy, whereas F15599 (0.040mg/kg, s.c.) had no significant effect at regionally-selective doses. These data support a role of presynaptic 5-HT_1A receptors in the anticataleptic effect of brexpiprazole. The selective 5-HT_2A antagonist M100907 (0.10mg/kg, s.c.) had no effect on haloperidol-induced catalepsy, arguing against a major role of 5-HT_2A receptors in the cataleptogenic profile of brexpiprazole. The findings with brexpiprazole were supported using microdialysis studies: Brexpiprazole (3.0 and 10mg/kg, p.o.) decreased extracellular 5-HT levels in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), while it failed to affect extracellular DA in the same samples, suggesting that the 5-HT_1A agonist properties of brexpiprazole may be preferentially presynaptic. In conclusion, these results confirm that brexpiprazole and aripiprazole have low propensities to induce EPS. However, the low EPS risk of brexpiprazole is more likely dependent on its agonist properties on presynaptic 5-HT_1A receptors, while that of aripiprazole is less sensitive to 5-HT_1A receptor antagonism.

Antidepressant effects of combination of brexpiprazole and fluoxetine on depression-like behavior and dendritic changes in mice after inflammation

RATIONALE

Addition of low doses of atypical antipsychotic drugs with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) could promote a rapid antidepressant effect in treatment-resistant patients with major depression. Brexpiprazole, a new atypical antipsychotic drug, has been used as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of major depression.

OBJECTIVES

The present study was undertaken to examine whether brexpiprazole could augment antidepressant effects of the SSRI fluoxetine in an inflammation model of depression.

METHODS

We examined the effects of fluoxetine (10 mg/kg), brexpiprazole (0.1 mg/kg), or the combination of the two drugs on depression-like behavior, alterations in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) - TrkB signaling, and dendritic spine density in selected brain regions after administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (0.5 mg/kg).

RESULTS

Combination of brexpiprazole and fluoxetine promoted a rapid antidepressant effect in inflammation model although brexpipazole or fluoxetine alone did not show antidepressant effect. Furthermore, the combination significantly improved LPS-induced alterations in the BDNF - TrkB signaling and dendritic spine density in the prefrontal cortex, CA3 and dentate gyrus, and nucleus accumbens.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that add-on of brexpiprazole to fluoxetine can produce a rapid antidepressant effect in the LPS inflammation model of depression, indicating that adjunctive therapy of brexpiprazole to SSRIs could produce a rapid antidepressant effect in depressed patients with inflammation.

Cost-effectiveness of brexpiprazole adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating psychiatric illness with a high cost burden. This analysis evaluates the cost-effectiveness of adjunctive brexpiprazole versus comparator branded adjunctive treatment for MDD and background antidepressant therapy (ADT) alone from a US payer perspective.

METHODS

An economic model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of brexpiprazole versus comparator adjunctive treatment and ADT alone on total direct medical costs using a 6-week cycle time frame for a total of 48 weeks, with treatment response and remission as primary outcomes. The model consisted of 3 parts, 1 to represent the acute treatment phase and 2 to represent the maintenance stage.

RESULTS

In the base-case analysis, brexpiprazole as reference treatment resulted in cost per additional responder ranging from $19,442-$48,745 and cost per additional remitter ranging from $27,196-$71,839 versus comparator treatments over 48 weeks. Sensitivity analyses showed treatment with brexpiprazole was more costly, but more clinically effective in all probabilistic simulations.

LIMITATIONS

This representation of disease natural history over 48 weeks may not account for all possible health states. Resource utilization on treatment was estimated using the resource use data from previous trials, and may overestimate medical costs compared to the real-world setting. Treatment comparators were limited to branded therapies, and head-to-head studies were not available to obtain data inputs.

CONCLUSION

Compared to other branded adjunctive therapies, brexpiprazole increases response and remission at 6 weeks; medical care cost savings were observed with the use of brexpiprazole. These findings may assist clinicians and formulary decision makers when selecting treatment for MDD.

Brexpiprazole as an adjunctive treatment in young adults with major depressive disorder who are in a school or work environment

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common, debilitating disorder with substantial socioeconomic burden. Many patients with MDD experience symptoms that impair functioning and productivity, often negatively affecting work or educational pursuits. This Phase 3b open-label study evaluated adjunctive brexpiprazole in young adults with MDD, who were in work or study.

METHODS

Young patients (18-35 years) with MDD (inadequate responders to 1-3 antidepressant treatments [ADT] for their current episode) received brexpiprazole 1-3mg/day (target dose, 2mg/day) adjunctive to the same stable dose of ADT for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Depressive symptoms improved during treatment with adjunctive brexpiprazole (primary endpoint, least squares [LS] mean change from baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] total score, -18.1 [p<0.0001]). Reductions from baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale Score (SDS; LS mean change -11.2 [p<0.0001]) and Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ; p<0.0001) indicated improvements in the effects of patients' symptoms on functioning (work/school, social life, and home responsibilities). Changes from baseline in additional measures supported improvements in patient functioning and depression symptoms. The most common adverse events were headache (21.3%), weight increase (17.0%), and somnolence (17.0%); reported rates of akathisia were low (6.4%). Clinically relevant increases in weight (≥7%) occurred in 10.5% of patients.

LIMITATIONS

Open-label design; absence of comparator.

CONCLUSIONS

Brexpiprazole may represent an effective therapy for adjunctive treatment strategy of young adults with MDD who are working or studying. The observed improvements in work/school functioning in patients with MDD, whose depression was treated with ADT+brexpiprazole, suggests potential to reduce socioeconomic burden.

Brexpiprazole as adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder with anxious distress: Results from a post-hoc analysis of two randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Anxiety symptoms are prevalent in major depressive disorder (MDD) and are associated with greater illness severity, suicidality, impaired functioning and poor response to antidepressant treatment (ADT). The efficacy and safety of brexpiprazole - a serotonin-dopamine activity modulator - as adjunctive treatment in patients with MDD was recently evaluated in two phase 3 studies. We here present a post-hoc analysis of the efficacy of adjunctive brexpiprazole in patients with MDD and symptoms of anxious distress, defined using proxies for DSM-5 criteria.

METHODS

Eligible patients were randomized to 2mg brexpiprazole+ADT or placebo+ADT (NCT01360645); or 1mg brexpiprazole+ADT, 3mg brexpiprazole+ADT, or placebo+ADT (NCT01360632), respectively. Patients were defined as having anxious distress if they had ≥2 of the symptoms tension (MADRS item 3 score ≥3), restlessness (IDS item 24 score ≥2), concentration (MADRS item 6 score ≥3), or apprehension (HAM-D item 10 score ≥3). Primary efficacy endpoint was change in MADRS total score from baseline to Week 6.

RESULTS

55% of the patients had anxious distress at baseline. Adjunctive brexpiprazole showed greater improvement than adjunctive placebo on the primary efficacy endpoint in both patients with (least square mean difference to placebo+ADT: 2mg+ADT: -2.95, p=0.0023; 3mg+ADT: -2.81, p=0.0027); and without anxious distress (1mg+ADT: -2.37, p=0.0093; 3mg+ADT: -2.23, p=0.0131). Brexpiprazole in patients with anxious distress was not associated with an increased incidence of activating adverse events (e.g., akathisia).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive brexpiprazole 2-3mg may be efficacious in reducing depressive symptoms and is well tolerated, in patients with MDD and anxious distress.

Efficacy of brexpiprazole in patients with acute schizophrenia: Review of three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies

Brexpiprazole, a serotonin-dopamine activity modulator, is a partial agonist at 5-HT1A and dopamine D2 receptors, and antagonist at 5-HT2A and noradrenaline α1B and α2C receptors, all at similar potency. Efficacy of brexpiprazole was evaluated in patients with acutely exacerbated schizophrenia in three short-term, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. In a Phase 2 study, patients were randomized to brexpiprazole 0.25mg (fixed dose), 1.0±0.5mg, 2.5±0.5mg, 5.0±1mg (flexible-dose ranges), placebo, or aripiprazole 15±5mg. In two Phase 3 studies, patients were randomized to fixed-dose brexpiprazole 0.25mg, 1mg, 2mg, or 4mg, or placebo. For this review, brexpiprazole 2mg and 4mg arms from the Phase 3 studies were combined. Primary efficacy endpoint was change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score from baseline at week 6; key secondary endpoint was change in Clinical Global Impression-Severity of illness (CGI-S) score at week 6. Primary outcome moderator analyses explored effects of sex, age, race, and illness duration. There were no statistically significant differences vs. placebo in the Phase 2 brexpiprazole and aripiprazole groups for primary and key secondary endpoints. Combined brexpiprazole 2mg (n=359) and 4mg (n=359) were superior to placebo (n=358) in change in PANSS total score (least square mean difference from placebo: -5.46, p=0.0004, and -6.69, p<0.0001, respectively) and CGI-S (-0.25, p=0.0035, and -0.38, p<0.0001, respectively). Changes from baseline in efficacy endpoints were minimal in the 0.25mg group, while the 1mg group exhibited suboptimal improvement. No relevant moderators were identified. Meta-analysis of the pivotal studies indicates brexpiprazole 2mg and 4mg are effective in treating acute schizophrenia.

Overview of short- and long-term tolerability and safety of brexpiprazole in patients with schizophrenia

Second-generation antipsychotics have demonstrated efficacy for patients with schizophrenia but are associated with wide-ranging side effects. Brexpiprazole, a serotonin-dopamine activity modulator, has demonstrated efficacy in adult patients with schizophrenia. This paper provides an overview of the safety and tolerability of brexpiprazole in patients with schizophrenia through examination of pooled safety data from one Phase 2 and two Phase 3 6-week, short-term studies, and two open-label, 52-week, long-term studies. In the short-term studies, there were no reports of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with an incidence≥5% and twice that of placebo in patients treated with brexpiprazole 2-4mg. In the long-term studies, TEAEs reported by ≥5% of patients were schizophrenia (10.7%), insomnia (8.0%), weight increase (7.7%), headache (6.0%), and agitation (5.2%). Akathisia rates were low in the short- (5.8%, pooled brexpiprazole group) and long-term studies (4.6%). Sedation rates were low in the short- (2.3%, pooled brexpiprazole group) and long-term studies (0.9%). Mean body weight increase was 1.1kg in both short- and long-term studies. For all studies, changes from baseline to last visit in laboratory parameters, electrocardiogram values, and vital signs were small and not clinically relevant. Changes in lipid profiles or other metabolic parameters were also small. Collectively, these studies suggest that brexpiprazole was well tolerated, with a favorable safety profile that does not exhibit significant rates of important adverse events that can be seen with existing antipsychotics (akathisia, sedation, weight gain, or QTc prolongation), and therefore may provide a useful treatment option for patients with schizophrenia. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00905307; NCT01396421; NCT01393613; NCT01649557; NCT01397786.

Brexpiprazole for the Treatment of Schizophrenia: A Review of this Novel Serotonin-Dopamine Activity Modulator

Brexpiprazole is an antipsychotic medication and received approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of schizophrenia in July 2015. Brexpiprazole acts as a partial agonist at dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptors, and as an antagonist at serotonin 5-HT2A and at adrenergic alpha1B and alpha2C receptors. Compared with aripiprazole, brexpiprazole is more potent at 5-HT1A receptors and displays less intrinsic activity at D2 receptors. The recommended dose range of brexpiprazole for the treatment of schizophrenia is 2-4 mg/day; the recommended titration schedule is to start with 1 mg/day and increase to 2 mg/day on Day 5 to Day 7, then to 4 mg/day on Day 8. Two positive, 6-week, Phase 3 randomized controlled trials in acute schizophrenia demonstrated superiority of brexpiprazole over placebo. Pooled responder rates were 46% for brexpiprazole 2-4 mg/day vs. 31% for placebo, resulting in a number needed to treat (NNT) of 7. In a 52-week, randomized withdrawal study, significantly fewer patients relapsed in the brexpiprazole group compared with placebo (13.5% vs. 38.5%), resulting in an NNT of 4. The most commonly encountered adverse event (incidence ≥4% and at least twice the rate of placebo) is increased weight. Short-term weight gain appears modest (approximately 10% of patients receiving brexpiprazole 1-4 mg/day gained ≥7% body weight from baseline, compared with 4% for those randomized to placebo, resulting in a number needed to harm [NNH] of 17); however, more outliers with an increase of ≥7% of body weight were evident in open-label, 52-week safety studies. Effects on glucose and lipids were small. Rates of akathisia as an adverse event were 5.5% for the pooled doses of brexpiprazole 1-4 mg/day vs. 4.6% for placebo, yielding an NNH of 112. Minimal effects on prolactin were observed, and no clinically relevant effects on the ECG QTc interval were evident. Brexpiprazole is also approved as an adjunct medication for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Phase 3 trials are ongoing in patients with agitation associated with Alzheimer's disease.

Brexpiprazole for the treatment of schizophrenia

Brexpiprazole (OPC-34712) is a novel serotonin-dopamine activity modulator, which has recently been approved by the U.S Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of schizophrenia. The aim of this paper is to systematically synthesize all data of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Brexpiprazole in treating schizophrenia. The terms 'Brexpiprazole', 'OPC-34712' and 'schizophrenia' were searched. A total of 12 clinical trials with 7 available data records were found. The pooled effect size of Brexpiprazole 1 mg, 2 mg and 4 mg were all superior to placebo in terms of the change from baseline in positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) total score at week 6 (weighted mean difference = -3.74, p = 0.044; weighted mean difference = -5.76, p < 0.01 and weighted mean difference = -7.03, p < 0.01, respectively) when compared to that of the placebo in treating acute schizophrenia. Brexpiprazole displays a good safety and tolerability profile. The incidence of akathisia, headache, insomnia, sedation, agitation, diarrhea, weight gained, nausea, and dyspepsia are comparable to placebo.

Brexpiprazole: a new dopamine D₂receptor partial agonist for the treatment of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder

Brexpiprazole is a dopamine D₂receptor partial agonist. Compared with aripiprazole, it is more potent at 5-HT1A receptors and displays less intrinsic activity at D₂receptors. Brexpiprazole also has potent antagonistic activity at 5-HT2A as well as alpha-adrenergic receptors. In addition to results from phase II trials, data are available from two pivotal phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of brexpiprazole for the acute treatment of schizophrenia and two pivotal phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of adjunctive brexpiprazole for the acute treatment of major depressive disorder in patients with inadequate response to antidepressant medication treatment. Overall tolerability is promising, with rates of discontinuation due to adverse events lower or slightly higher than that observed for placebo. Although overall akathisia was more commonly observed with brexpiprazole than with placebo, the absolute risk increase attributable to brexpiprazole appears small. Short-term weight gain appears modest; however, outliers with an increase of ≥ 7% of body weight were evident in open-label long-term safety studies.

American Psychiatric Association - 168th Annual Meeting (May 16-20, 2015 - Toronto, Canada)

The theme of this year's American Psychiatric Association (APA) meeting was 'Psychiatry: integrating body and mind, heart and soul', with special focus given to advances in basic and cognitive neuroscience and how these may contribute to integrated care of mental health and illness. The program featured numerous tracks and subtracks in areas of interest such as addiction psychiatry, child, adolescent and geriatric psychiatry, and psychosomatic medicine.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled phase 3 trial of fixed-dose brexpiprazole for the treatment of adults with acute schizophrenia

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of brexpiprazole versus placebo in adults with acute schizophrenia. This was a 6-week, multicenter, placebo-controlled double-blind phase 3 study. Patients with acute schizophrenia were randomized to brexpiprazole 1, 2 or 4 mg, or placebo (2:3:3:3) once daily. The primary endpoint was changed from baseline at week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score; the key secondary endpoint was Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) at week 6. Brexpiprazole 4 mg showed statistically significant improvement versus placebo (treatment difference: -6.47, p=0.0022) for the primary endpoint. Improvement compared with placebo was also seen for the key secondary endpoint (treatment difference: -0.38, p=0.0015), and on multiple secondary efficacy outcomes. Brexpiprazole 1 and 2mg also showed numerical improvements versus placebo, although p>0.05. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were headache, insomnia and agitation; incidences of akathisia were lower in the brexpiprazole treatment groups (4.2%-6.5%) versus placebo (7.1%). Brexpiprazole treatment was associated with moderate weight gain at week 6 (1.23-1.89 kg versus 0.35 kg for placebo); there were no clinically relevant changes in laboratory parameters and vital signs. In conclusion, brexpiprazole 4 mg is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for acute schizophrenia in adults. Clinical Trials.gov NCT01393613; BEACON trial.