Swine influenza virus vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis

Tetravalent Influenza Vaccine Is Not Associated With Neuroaxonal Damage in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Background

Efficacy of vaccines and disease activity linked to immunization are major concerns among people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS).

Objective

To assess antibody responses to seasonal influenza antigens and vaccine-associated neuroaxonal damage utilizing serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) in pwMS receiving dimethyl fumarate (DMF).

Methods

In this prospective study, the 2020/2021 seasonal tetravalent influenza vaccine was administered to 20 pwMS treated with DMF and 15 healthy controls (HCs). The primary endpoints were responder rate of strain-specific antibody production (seroconversion or significant (4-fold) increase in influenza-antibody titers for ≥2/4 strains) at 30 days post-vaccination and changes in sNfL levels.

Results

All patients treated with DMF fulfilled the responder criteria for immunization compared with 53% of the controls. However, higher proportions of HCs already had influenza-antibody titers ≥1:40 at baseline (53% vs. 41%, p = 0.174). sNfL levels were comparable among both groups at baseline and did not increase 34 days after vaccination. In addition, no clinical or radiological disease reactivation was found.

Conclusion

DMF-treated patients mount an adequate humoral immune response to influenza vaccines. Within the limits of the small cohort investigated, our data suggest that influenza immunization is not associated with clinical or subclinical disease reactivation.

COVID-19 mRNA vaccination leading to CNS inflammation: a case series

The availability of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), provides hope towards mitigation of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Vaccine safety and efficacy has not been established in individuals with chronic autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). Anecdotal reports suggest that the vaccines may be associated with brain, spinal cord, peripheral nervous system, and cardiac inflammation. Based on the high morbidity and unpredictable course of COVID-19, and the need to achieve herd immunity, vaccination has been recommended for patients with MS. We report clinical and MRI features of seven individuals who received the Moderna (n = 3) or Pfizer (n = 4) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. Within one to 21 days of either the first (n = 2) or second (n = 5) vaccine dose, these patients developed neurologic symptoms and MRI findings consistent with active CNS demyelination of the optic nerve, brain, and/or spinal cord. Symptoms included visual loss, dysmetria, gait instability, paresthesias, sphincter disturbance, and limb weakness. Age ranged from 24 to 64 (mean 39.1) years; five were woman (71.4%). The final diagnosis was exacerbation of known stable MS (n = 4, two were receiving disease-modifying therapy at the time of vaccination), new onset MS (n = 2), or new onset neuromyelitis optica (n = 1). All responded to corticosteroid (n = 7) or plasma exchange (n = 1) therapy, with five returning to baseline and two approaching baseline. Large prospective studies are required to further investigate any possible relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and acute CNS demyelination.

Registry Cohort Study to Determine Risk for Multiple Sclerosis after Vaccination for Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1) with Arepanrix, Manitoba, Canada

To investigate a potential risk for multiple sclerosis (MS) after vaccination with Arepanrix, the GlaxoSmithKline AS03-adjuvanted influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine, we used the provincewide immunization registry for Manitoba, Canada, to match 341,347 persons vaccinated during the 2009 pandemic to 485,941 unvaccinated persons on age, sex, address, and a propensity score measuring the probability of vaccination. We used a previously validated algorithm to identify MS cases from provincial hospital, physician, and prescription drug claims databases. After 12 months of follow-up, the age-adjusted incidence rate of MS was 17.7 cases per 100,000 person-years in the Arepanrix cohort and 24.2 per 100,000 in the unvaccinated cohort. The corresponding adjusted hazard ratio was 0.9. We observed similar patterns when we measured incidence over the entire follow-up period. The AS03 adjuvant, a candidate for inclusion in future pandemic vaccines, does not appear to increase the short-term risk for MS when included in influenza vaccines.

Vaccines and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review

Vaccinations are often the most effective tool against some disease known to mankind. This study offers a literature review on the role of vaccines regarding the risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS) and MS relapse. The method used in this study is a systematic literature review on the database PubMed. The study found no change in risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS) after vaccination against hepatitis B virus, human papillomavirus, seasonal influenza, measles-mumps-rubella, variola, tetanus, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), polio, or diphtheria. No change in risk of relapse was found for influenza. Further research is needed for the potential therapeutic use of the BCG vaccine in patients in risk of developing MS and for the preventive potential of the tetanus and diphtheria vaccine.

The safety of influenza vaccines in children: An Institute for Vaccine Safety white paper

Most influenza vaccines are generally safe, but influenza vaccines can cause rare serious adverse events. Some adverse events, such as fever and febrile seizures, are more common in children than adults. There can be differences in the safety of vaccines in different populations due to underlying differences in genetic predisposition to the adverse event. Live attenuated vaccines have not been studied adequately in children under 2 years of age to determine the risks of adverse events; more studies are needed to address this and several other priority safety issues with all influenza vaccines in children. All vaccines intended for use in children require safety testing in the target age group, especially in young children. Safety of one influenza vaccine in children should not be extrapolated to assumed safety of all influenza vaccines in children. The low rates of adverse events from influenza vaccines should not be a deterrent to the use of influenza vaccines because of the overwhelming evidence of the burden of disease due to influenza in children.

Vaccination against infection in patients with multiple sclerosis

Bacterial and viral infections have been shown to induce relapses and accelerate the progression of multiple sclerosis (MS). Vaccination to prevent communicable disease in such patients is, therefore, of key importance. Reports of potentially detrimental effects of immunization on the course of MS, however, have prompted patients and physicians to adopt a cautious attitude towards the use of vaccines. The risks associated with a number of vaccines have been investigated in patients with MS. Vaccines against some diseases, such as tetanus and hepatitis B, are not associated with an elevated risk of MS exacerbation, whereas vaccines against other diseases, such as yellow fever, are contraindicated in patients with MS. Many patients with MS receive immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapy, which could make them more susceptible to infectious diseases and might also affect their ability to respond to immunization. Here, we review the indications for and possible adverse effects of vaccines in patients with MS, and address issues of vaccination in the context of immunomodulatory therapy for MS.

[Vaccination and multiple sclerosis]

Vaccinations to prevent communicable diseases are, like in other chronic diseases, of special importance in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Various bacterial and viral infections have been shown to induce relapses of MS. Reports of possible adverse effects of vaccinations on the course of multiple sclerosis have led patients and treating physicians to exercise caution in the use of vaccines. A number of vaccines have been studied with respect to the risk in MS patients. Some vaccines, for example against yellow fever, are not indicated in MS due to the risk of MS exacerbation. In contrast, tetanus or hepatitis B vaccines do not represent a risk for manifestation or disease progression of MS. Before and during immunomodulatory therapy of MS special attention should be given to adequate protection against vaccine preventable diseases.This paper reviews the indications and specific side effects of vaccinations in MS patients. Additionally, issues of vaccination under immunomodulatory therapy of MS are discussed.

Vaccinations and the risk of relapse in multiple sclerosis. Vaccines in Multiple Sclerosis Study Group

BACKGROUND

There has been some concern that vaccination may precipitate the onset of multiple sclerosis or lead to relapses. Since the recent hepatitis B vaccination program in France, there have been new reports of an increased risk of active multiple sclerosis after vaccination.

METHODS

We conducted a case-crossover study to assess whether vaccinations increase the risk of relapse in multiple sclerosis. The subjects were patients included in the European Database for Multiple Sclerosis who had a relapse between 1993 and 1997. The index relapse was the first relapse confirmed by a visit to a neurologist and preceded by a relapse-free period of at least 12 months. Information on vaccinations was obtained in a standardized telephone interview and confirmed by means of medical records. Exposure to vaccination in the two-month risk period immediately preceding the relapse was compared with that in the four previous two-month control periods for the calculation of relative risks, which were estimated with the use of conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 643 patients with relapses of multiple sclerosis, 15 percent reported having been vaccinated during the preceding 12 months. The reports of 94 percent of these vaccinations were confirmed. Of all the patients, 2.3 percent had been vaccinated during the preceding two-month risk period as compared with 2.8 to 4.0 percent who were vaccinated during one or more of the four control periods. The relative risk of relapse associated with exposure to any vaccination during the previous two months was 0.71 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.40 to 1.26). There was no increase in the specific risk of relapse associated with tetanus, hepatitis B, or influenza vaccination (range of relative risks, 0.22 to 1.08). Analyses based on risk periods of one and three months yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaccination does not appear to increase the short-term risk of relapse in multiple sclerosis.

A survey of physicians' vaccine risk perception and immunization practices for subjects with immunological diseases

Various publications have caused concern by implying that immunization may be linked to new cases or flare-ups of immunological diseases (IDs). In view of the resulting uncertainty, we studied physicians' vaccine risk perception and immunization practices for adults with IDs. A questionnaire was mailed to three groups of physicians in France: internal medicine specialists, general practitioners, and travel clinic physicians. Thirteen vaccines currently used for adults in France were studied. Risk perception was rated on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS). The distribution of the answers was compared between and within groups of physicians. Potential associations between risk perception and reported practices were investigated by multivariate analysis. In the three groups of physicians (n=762), the tetanus and Salk poliomyelitis vaccines had the lowest risk perception. The yellow fever, BCG and Sabin poliomyelitis vaccines were the least well perceived. The distribution of risk perception for these three live vaccines and the hepatitis B vaccine was uniform according to VAS grading. For the other vaccines studied, the distribution was skewed to the low-risk perception side of the VAS. Risk perception was greater for physicians who stated: (1) that certain IDs carried a high risk of adverse events following immunization; (2) that they sought the advice of the referent physician before immunization; (3) warned their patients of the risk of an ID flare-up after vaccination; (4) sought information about recent immunization in patients with a flare-up; and (5) had experience of the side effects of immunization in adults with ID. Risk perception was lower for physicians who said they updated immunizations, and for the internists. The worse the vaccine risk perception by physicians, the more uniform the distribution of perception, thus reflecting the disagreement of the scientific community about the risk of using such vaccines for adults with an ID. Risk perception and immunization practices were related in adults with ID. Understanding of decisions concerning immunization may help to improve immunization updating and prevent risk amplification when evidence is lacking.

Effects of influenza vaccination and influenza illness on exacerbations in multiple sclerosis

Despite reports that influenza vaccination appears to be safe in multiple sclerosis there is uncertainty which patients may benefit from it. By using a questionnaire we compared the effects of influenza illness (1995-1996 season) and influenza vaccination (autumn of 1996) on neurologic symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis registered in the Groningen Multiple Sclerosis Data Bank. No clinically relevant effects were reported in 53 patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis, either following vaccination or the illness. In a group of 180 patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis, an exacerbation occurred within the following 6 weeks in 33% after influenza illness, whereas it occurred in only 5% after vaccination. The exacerbation rate following influenza illness was significantly higher regardless of whether patients were essentially restricted to wheelchair or not. Because of a substantial greater risk of relapse after influenza illness than after vaccination, annual influenza vaccination should be offered routinely to all patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis. Observations and reflections--a personal memoir

The pathogenesis of MS has become better understood as a result of recent advances in several areas, particularly in epidemiology and neuro-imaging. A number of epidemiologically based conclusions need to be revised, most importantly the putative direct relationship between prevalence and latitude, and the concept that epidemics of MS have occurred in some parts of the world. It is now clear that genetic factors play a much more important role in the genesis of the disease than environmental factors, although the latter cannot be ignored. The existence of a genetic susceptibility, coupled with either protective or enhancing factors, which may be genetic or environmental, is recognized as being most important in individuals of northern European origin. Much evidence suggests that the disease is initiated by a viral illness (or possibly a vaccination) at some time before puberty. This first antigenic challenge results in the development of what is called the "MS trait", a systemic condition that may never develop into the actual disease and may be observed as well in the unaffected siblings of MS patients. The trait is almost certainly a manifestation of an alteration of the immune system; its most important effect is to render the blood-brain barrier more vulnerable to a variety of agents that will increase its permeability. In order for MS to involve the central nervous system, loss of integrity of the blood-brain barrier is an obligatory step, an observation which has now been amply confirmed by neuroimaging studies. This effect upon the blood-brain barrier appears to be non-specific, since it may result from such diverse causes as a viral infection, a vaccination, or mild trauma. Edema and inflammation follow, but myelinoclasia is not always a consequence; thus plaque formation may not occur and the initial lesion of MS may disappear without leaving a trace. The actual mechanism of myelinoclasia, and the role played in it by lymphocytes, remain unknown. Although the disease does affect the central nervous system, it may remain asymptomatic for a long time after the actual plaque is formed, even for the person's entire life.

Vaccination of patients with encephalomyelitis disseminata

The aetiopathogenesis of Encephalomyelitis disseminata (multiple sclerosis) is not yet fully understood. It is thought to involve an immunopathological process, with various exogenic factors considered to be possibly responsible for inducing the disease or causing acute exacerbations. In the literature the following factors are described as having the capacity to interfere directly or indirectly in immunoregulatory mechanisms: infectious diseases, gravidity, various types of trauma, non-infectious diseases, and drugs, but also physical strain and vaccinations.