Distribution of infecting hepatitis C virus genotypes in end-stage liver disease patients at a large American transplantation center

Hepatitis C virus genotypes in clinical specimens tested at a national reference testing laboratory in the United States

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) distribution and frequency were studied among 22,407 unique specimens tested at a national reference testing laboratory. Subjects with HCV GT 3 were younger (P < 0.0001) than those with GT 1, 2, or 4, and the regional frequencies of HCV GT 2 and 3 ranged from 19.9% to 29.2%.

Effect of nonviral factors on hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Hepatitis C (HCV) is now the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). While graft reinfection remains universal, progression to graft cirrhosis is highly variable. This study examined donor, recipient, and operative variables to identify factors that affect recurrence of HCV post-OLT to facilitate graft-recipient matching.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 307 patients who underwent OLT for HCV over a 10-year period at our center. Recurrence of HCV was identified by the presence of biochemical graft dysfunction and concurrent liver biopsy showing diagnostic pathologic features. Time to recurrence was the endpoint for statistical analysis. Five donor, 6 recipient, and 2 operative variables that may affect recurrence were analyzed by univariate comparison and Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS

Recurrence-free survival in the 307 study patients was 69% and 34% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Four predictive variables related to either donor or recipient characteristics were identified. Advanced donor age, prolonged donor hospitalization, increasing recipient age, and elevated recipient MELD scores were found to increase the relative risk of HCV recurrence. Examination of HLA disparity between donors and recipients demonstrated no correlation between class I or class II mismatches and recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified donor and recipient characteristics that significantly predict hepatitis C recurrence following liver transplantation. These factors are identifiable before transplant and, if considered when matching donors to HCV recipients, may decrease the incidence of HCV recurrence after OLT. A change in the current national liver allocation system would be needed to realize the full value of this benefit.

The status of liver transplantation for hepatitis C

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects 3% of the world's population, or approximately 170 million people. Most of those acutely infected progress to chronic infection and are unresponsive to existing antiviral treatment. Over a 20-year period, chronic HCV infection leads to cirrhosis and the sequelae of end-stage liver disease, including hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, variceal haemorrhage and hepatocellular carcinoma. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the optimal treatment for decompensated HCV cirrhosis, but is limited by organ availability and universal graft reinfection. This review discusses the results with OLT for HCV from the Dumont-UCLA Liver Transplant Center and discusses future directions in the management of HCV.

Hepatitis C virus genotypes and viral concentrations in participants of a general population survey in the United States

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Estimates of the long-term benefits of antiviral therapies for chronic hepatitis C are influenced by the frequency of characteristics that affect response in the population treated. This study determined hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes and RNA titers among HCV-infected persons in the general population of the United States.

METHODS

Genotypes were determined from the NS5b region, and HCV RNA was quantified by using Amplicor Monitor (Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc, Branchburg, NJ) from 275 HCV RNA-positive participants in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted during 1988 to 1994.

RESULTS

The HCV genotypes identified included 1a (n = 142), 1b (n = 73), 2a (n = 8), 2b (n = 27), 3a (n = 17), 4 (n = 3), and 6 (n = 5). Based on weighted analysis of persons infected with genotypes 1, 2, and 3, genotype 1 predominated in all age groups (75.3%). By racial/ethnic group, genotype 1 was found in 90.9% of non-Hispanic blacks, 69.6% of non-Hispanic whites, and 71.2% of Mexican Americans. After adjusting for age and gender, only non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity was independently associated with genotype 1 infection (adjusted odds ratio 4.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-12.8). The overall geometric mean concentration of HCV RNA was 2.1 x 10(6) IU/mL; concentrations > 2 million IU/mL were found in 53.0% overall and 50.3% of persons with genotype 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Persons with chronic hepatitis C in the United States who may require treatment in the foreseeable future are predominantly infected with genotype 1, including a disproportionate number of non-Hispanic blacks. These features emphasize the need for improved therapies that reduce or eliminate complications from genotype 1 infections.

Hepatic disease in injection drug users

A wide variety of infectious diseases affect injection drug users. One of the most common is viral hepatitis. In the United States, hepatitis B affects 1.5 million people, and hepatitis C affects more than 4 million people, many of whom are past or current users of injected drugs. Although the treatment for chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C has improved, protocols specifically designed for injection drug users, especially given their lifestyle and reportedly low compliance rates, are seriously lacking. These disorders can lead to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and the need for liver transplantation in a sizeable proportion of cases. Therefore, early intervention should be a top priority.

Impact of human herpesvirus-6 on the frequency and severity of recurrent hepatitis C virus hepatitis in liver transplant recipients

A role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) In the immunopathogenesis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been proposed. The novel herpes virus, human herpes virus-6 (HHV-6), is amongst the most potent inducers of cytokines, including TNF-alpha. The impact of HHV-6 viremia on the progression of recurrent HCV hepatitis was assessed in 51 HCV-positive liver transplant recipients. The frequency of recurrent HCV hepatitis did not differ between patients with HCV viremia (47.6%, 10/21) as compared with those without HCV viremia (46.7%, 14/30, p = 0.9). However, the patients with HHV-6 viremia had a significantly higher fibrosis score upon HCV recurrence than those without HHV-6 viremia (mean 1.5 vs. 0.3, p = 0.01). An association between cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia and HCV recurrence was not documented; 50% (15/30) of the patients with CMV viremia and 42.8% (9/21) of those without CMV viremia had recurrent HCV hepatitis (p > 0.5). Receipt of ganciclovir (administered upon the detection of CMV viremia) was associated with lower total Knodell score (mean 5.2 vs. 6.9, p = 0.05) and a trend towards lower fibrosis score (mean 0.44 vs. 1.00, p = 0.12) in patients with recurrent HCV hepatitis. Thus, HHV-6 viremia in HCV-positive liver transplant recipients identified a subgroup of patients at increased risk for early fibrosis upon HCV recurrence.

Changes in hepatitis C virus population in serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in chronically infected patients receiving liver graft from infected donors

BACKGROUND

We have previously studied hepatitis C (HCV)-infected recipients of livers from HCV-infected donors and found that either the donor's strain or the recipient's strain predominate in serum. The current study was undertaken to determine whether these changes are complete and whether they are reflected in the population of virus associated with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).

METHODS

We analyzed HCV ribonucleic acid from sequential serum and PBMC samples from 11 and 8 patients, respectively. The relatively stable NS5 region was chosen for analysis because it allowed for dependable identification of donor and recipient strains. Viral sequences were analyzed by direct sequencing and by sensitive strain-specific polymerase chain reaction assays. These assays were capable of detecting the minor sequence present at a concentration 1:104-10-7 below that of the major sequence.

RESULTS

Five patients retained their original infecting strain; the donor strain was detected only transiently. In the remaining six patients, recipient strain was detected for the first few weeks, after which only the donor strain was consistently present. However, in one patient the second nondominant strain was detected from the background of the major strain on a single occasion 8 months after transplantation. All changes in serum were closely paralleled by those occurring in PBMCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Viral population changes in the setting of liver transplantation from HCV-infected donors to HCV-infected recipients occur simultaneously in PBMCs and serum. The takeover of one strain by another in PBMC- and serum-derived viral populations seemed to be complete and long lasting.

HCV genotype and "silent" HBV coinfection: two main risk factors for a more severe liver disease

To evaluate whether HCV genotype and a "silent" HBV infection may be related to a more severe clinical presentation of liver disease, 205 anti-HCV/HCV-RNA positive, HBsAg/anti-HBs negative patients with chronic hepatitis (113 males and 92 females; median age 55 years, range 18-77), were studied on presentation at the Liver Unit from January 1993 to December 1997. Presence of serum anti-HBc, in the absence of HBsAg and anti-HBs, was considered a marker of "silent" HBV infection. Of the 205 patients, 134 had undergone percutaneous liver biopsy. Two main diagnosis groups were established: the mild liver disease group (76 patients), and the severe liver disease group (109 patients); 20 patients who had refused to undergo liver biopsy were not included in the clinical and virological evaluation because the diagnosis was uncertain. The prevalence of severe liver disease was similar in the genotype 1 and non-1 groups (61.3% of 98 patients with genotype 1 and 52.9% of 70 patients with a non-1 genotype). Instead, the 88 patients with "silent" HBV infection showed a higher percentage of severe liver disease than the 97 anti-HBc negative patients (72.7% vs. 46.4%, respectively: P < 0.0005). Of the 88 anti-HBc positive patients, the prevalence of those with severe liver disease was similar in the 32 cases with serum HBV-DNA as detected by PCR and in the 56 HBV-DNA negative (81.2% vs. 67.8%, P = 0.4). The relation between "silent" HBV infection and severe liver disease was observed both in genotype 1 and non-1 infected patients. Nevertheless, the anti-HBc negative patients infected by genotype 1 showed a severe liver disease more frequently than those infected by a non-1 genotype, with a difference that is significant to the statistical analysis (P < 0.05). The findings suggest that "silent" HBV infection in anti-HCV positive chronic hepatitis enhances the severity of the liver disease. Evidence was also found that in patients without "silent" HBV infection there is a correlation between the presence of HCV genotype 1 and the severity of liver disease.

Exposure of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA-positive recipients to HCV RNA-positive blood donors results in rapid predominance of a single donor strain and exclusion and/or suppression of the recipient strain

We have analyzed three cases of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected recipients who received blood from HCV-infected donors. Two recipients were exposed to two different HCV RNA-positive donors, and one was exposed to a single donor. All parental genomes from the actual infecting units of blood and the recipients were defined, and their presence in the follow-up serum samples was determined using sensitive strain-specific assays. The strain from one of the donors was found to predominate in all recipients' serum samples collected throughout the follow-up period of 10 to 30 months. In two recipients exposed to two infected donors, the strain from the second donor was occasionally found at very low level. However, the original recipients' strains were not detected. Our observations show that HCV-infected individuals can be superinfected with different strains, and this event may lead to eradication or suppression of the original infecting strain. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate that simultaneous exposure to multiple HCV strains may result in concomitant infection by more than one strain, although a single strain could rapidly establish its dominance. The results of the present study suggest the existence of competition among infecting HCV strains which determines the ultimate outcome of multiple HCV exposure.

HCV genotypes--role in pathogenesis of disease and response to therapy

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) shows considerable variation in its genomic structure, allowing classification into six main genotypes. Epidemiological studies have shown marked differences in genotype distribution by geographical region, and between patient groups. Improved understanding of the rate of nucleotide sequence mutation in HCV has allowed the approximate time of divergence of major genotypes to be estimated, and the origin and spread of the present epidemic of hepatitis C to be better defined. Improved methods of genotype definition over the last few years have enabled the importance of genotype in the progression of HCV-related disease and response to anti-viral therapy to be studied. Present data strongly indicates that HCV genotype is an important determinant of response to treatment, but the effect of genotype on disease progression has been harder to clarify. This is largely due to the absence of model systems of HCV infection, the epidemiological differences in patient groups infected with the different genotypes, and the lack of good prospective longitudinal clinical data. As a result of advances in methodology, and recent results of large clinical trials of combination therapy, a knowledge of HCV genotype is now central to the clinician in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection in American veterans

OBJECTIVE

This study reports the findings of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in a large Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System in suburban Northern California.

METHODS

All veterans who had anti-HCV (EIA II) tested during a 6-yr period (7/92 to 6/98) were included in this study. To estimate the seroprevalence of anti-HCV among our population, 126 consecutive bloodborne pathogen exposure accidents were studied.

RESULTS

Of 8558 veterans tested for anti-HCV (EIA II), 2985 (35%) veterans were positive with a mean age of 48.4 yr (range, 28-89 yr). Sixty percent were between the age of 41 and 50 yr. Risk factors for HCV infection identified in 409 consecutive veterans were intravenous drug abuse (81%), unknown (11%), blood transfusion (3%), sexual/household contact (2%), transfusion and intravenous drug use (2%), and tattoo (1%). Of 215 consecutive anti-HCV-positive veterans whose sera were tested by polymerase chain reaction, 96% were viremic. The most common HCV genotypes were 1a (50.5%), 1b (22.8%), 3a (12.1%), 2b (9.7%), 2a (1.9%), undetermined (1.9%), and mixed infection (1%). Veterans infected with genotype 1b were significantly older. Among 126 consecutive bloodborne pathogen exposure accidents, hepatitis C serology was available for 72 index veterans involved in the accidents and 18% were positive.

CONCLUSIONS

We found the epidemiology of hepatitis C infection was different in the veteran population when compared to other published data on nonveterans. Hepatitis C infection was much more common among veteran, within a very narrow age distribution and intravenous drug use was the major risk factor.

Hepatitis C virus genotypes and quasispecies

Genetic heterogeneity is a hallmark of the hepatitis C virus, as a result largely of the infidelity of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Random nucleotide substitutions are introduced at a very high rate. The existence of genotypes was confirmed by statistical and mathematical techniques, and the relation of the genotypes to each other has been determined. There are six major genotypes, each with multiple subtypes. Isolates of the same genotype have an average sequence homology of 95%, but different genotypes have sequence similarity of approximately 65% on average. The nucleotide sequence in portions of the hepatitis C viral genome, including the 5' noncoding region, part of the core gene, and other nonstructural proteins, is highly conserved. Genotype analysis typically utilizes these highly conserved regions. There are many techniques for determining viral genotype, and in general, concordance between techniques is good. Methods most commonly used for assigning hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes in clinical practice include restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and the reverse hybridization line probe assay (LiPA; Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium). The worldwide distribution of HCV genotypes has been determined; some genotypes are highly characteristic of certain areas. The most common subtypes, 1 and 2, are less genetically diverse than the others and are more widely distributed. The impact of genotype on disease course is controversial, but recent data suggest that there is a genotype-dependent differential response to therapy. Quasispecies refers to evolution of a highly related but genetically heterogeneous population of HCV isolates. The pathobiological and clinical implications of HCV quasispecies are poorly understood.

Outcome of liver transplantation in hepatitis C virus-infected patients who received hepatitis C virus-infected grafts

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The present organ shortage has brought into question the suitability of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive grafts. This study reviewed the outcome of such transplantations in our institution.

METHODS

Twenty-three HCV-positive patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for end-stage liver disease with HCV-positive grafts in 1992-1995 were studied. Only patients who survived more than 30 days were included in the analysis. Control group included 169 patients who underwent transplantation for HCV-related cirrhosis and received HCV-negative organs.

RESULTS

Patients who received HCV-infected organs had a cumulative survival rate of 89% and 72% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, vs. 88% and 73% for the control group (NS). There was no difference in graft survival, incidence of cirrhosis, mean hepatitis activity index score, fibrosis, or mean activity of serum transaminases. There was a trend toward lower incidence of recurrent hepatitis C in the study group compared with control (21% vs. 23% at 1 year and 47% vs. 64% at 5 years; NS). Patients in whom the donor strain became predominant after transplantation had significantly longer disease-free survival than patients who retained their own HCV strain (P < 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

HCV-infected livers transplanted into HCV-infected recipients do not appear to convey a worse outcome in the initial years after OLT than HCV-negative grafts.

Recurrent and new hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation

Chronic infection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common reason for liver transplantation. We examined the results of laboratory tests for HCV on a cohort of patients who received a liver transplant between 1990 and 1994 at three large centers. Seven hundred twenty-two recipients and 604 donors were tested for antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) using a second-generation enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA-2), followed by recombinant immunoblot (RIBA-2) and HCV RNA confirmation by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (with genotyping and viral quantification). Diagnosis of posttransplantation infection required detection of serum HCV RNA that could be genotyped by sequencing or was repeatedly positive despite being unsequenceable. Twenty-five percent of transplantation candidates were seropositive for anti-HCV. Approximately 86% of anti-HCV-positive, 93% of RIBA-positive, and 97% of HCV RNA-positive candidates developed infection after transplantation. Pretransplantation HCV RNA was superior to RIBA-2 for predicting posttransplantation infection. Whereas HCV genotype was identified in nearly all candidates and changed little after transplantation, serum viral levels rose markedly after transplantation. Fifteen donors were either anti-HCV- or HCV RNA-positive. Recipients of grafts from donors with HCV RNA all developed infection, whereas infection was not detected in recipients of grafts from donors with anti-HCV but without detectable HCV RNA. The rate of new infection fell significantly (P =.02) after the introduction of EIA-2 screening of blood. Donor and candidate markers for HCV predict posttransplantation infection.

Interferon-alpha for prophylaxis of recurrent viral hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In a randomized, controlled trial, we sought to determine whether prophylaxis with interferon-alpha for 6 months had an impact on rate, severity, and timing of onset of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) hepatitis in liver transplant recipients and to assess whether interferon use was associated with rejection in liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

Twenty-four consecutive liver transplant recipients with HCV were randomized after transplantation to receive either interferon-alpha (3 million U three times weekly) for 6 months or no prophylaxis; median follow-up was 874 days.

RESULTS

Recurrent HCV hepatitis (histopathologically proven) developed in 50% (6 of 12) of the interferon-alpha patients versus 42% (5 of 12) of the control patients (P=NS). Severity of recurrence (as assessed by Knodell score on liver biopsies) also did not differ between the two groups (mean 4.0 for interferon-alpha patients versus 3.5 for control patients, P=NS). Interferon-alpha, however, significantly delayed the timing of occurrence of HCV hepatitis; recurrent HCV hepatitis developed a median of 408 days after transplant in the interferon-alpha group versus 193 days in the control group (P=0.05). No difference in graft or patient survival was demonstrated in the two groups. Rejection episodes, treated with corticosteroids, occurred in 50% (6 of 12) of patients in the interferon-alpha group versus 42% (5 of 12) in the control group (P=NS). Corticosteroid resistant rejection (requiring OKT3) occurred in only one study patient (in the control group).

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon-alpha in liver transplant recipients for 6 months delayed the occurrence of HCV hepatitis, but did not decrease the incidence nor the severity of HCV hepatitis after transplantation. Interferon-alpha use was not associated with a higher incidence of rejection compared with the control patients.

The influence of hepatitis C virus genotypes on the outcome of liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to report the influence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes and HLA matches on the outcome of liver transplantation, hepatitis recurrence, and progression to cirrhosis after transplantation.

METHODS

HCV genotypes were determined from pretransplantation sera and/or liver explant tissues from 202 patients with HCV-related end-stage liver disease. One hundred fifty patients with known infecting genotype for whom posttransplantation biopsy specimens were available or who had normal results of liver injury tests constituted the group analyzed. Patients were followed up for up to 4.5 years. Hepatitis activity index scores at the time of disease recurrence were used to assess disease activity. Cirrhosis was diagnosed by using histological evidence. The number of HLA matches with respect to A, B, DR, and DQ loci was determined.

RESULTS

The rates of hepatitis recurrence were 25% and 75% at 1 year and 4 years, respectively; Kaplan-Meier survival analysis did not reveal significant differences between the infecting genotypes with respect to overall rates of survival or recurrence of hepatitis. At hepatitis recurrence, hepatitis activity index scores did not differ between the genotype groups. The distribution of infecting genotypes among the 7 patients who developed cirrhosis is reflective of pretransplantation distribution. Neither HLA site-specific nor total matches affected the rates of survival or disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The infecting HCV genotype had no influence on the incidence or severity of recurrent hepatitis, rate of survival, or development of cirrhosis. HLA matching does not influence transplantation outcome for HCV-related disease.

Hepatitis G virus coinfection in hepatitis C virus-infected liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

In this study, we determined the prevalence of hepatitis G virus (HGV) infection in end-stage hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease and examined the influence of HGV coinfection on the outcome of liver transplantation.

METHODS

HGV was detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and Southern blotting in sera drawn from 159 patients who were known to be HCV infected before transplantation. Patients were followed up for a mean of 28.4 months after transplantation.

RESULTS

Forty-one (25.3%) patients were HGV positive and the prevalence of HGV infection was similar for different HCV genotypes. Both HGV-positive and -negative groups had similar survival, recurrence rates, inflammatory activity scores, and degree of fibrosis at the time of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Infection with HGV is common in end-stage HCV-infected patients presenting for liver transplantation. It influences neither the outcome of liver transplantation nor the recurrence of hepatitis in the graft.