Assessing the Role of Long-Acting Cabotegravir Preexposure Prophylaxis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Opportunities and Aspirations

Provider Factors Likely to Impact Access and Uptake of Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir for Transgender Women in the United States: Results of a Qualitative Study

ABSTRACT

Long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) was US Food and Drug Administration-approved in 2021. However, little is known about providers' CAB-LA knowledge, attitudes, challenges, and prescribing preferences for transgender women patients. Understanding this is critical to developing new pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) interventions tailored to transgender women. We conducted 45-min, in-depth Zoom interviews (IDIs) with United States-based health care providers who prescribe PrEP to transgender women. IDIs focused on providers' CAB-LA knowledge/acceptability, willingness to prescribe CAB-LA to transgender women, potential challenges, and solutions to mitigate challenges. Providers ( N = 17) had a mean age of 43 years, and 35.4% ( n = 6) identified as people of color. Most ( n = 12) had basic knowledge of CAB-LA but wanted additional training. All participants found CAB-LA acceptable and were willing to prescribe. Most ( n = 11) anticipated minimal challenges to implementation. Others ( n = 4) reported potential issues, including logistical/scheduling concerns that impede CAB-LA integration and staffing concerns. Many providers expressed support for self-injection ( n = 13) and injections at "drop-in" clinics ( n = 8) to overcome challenges.

Acceptability of and Preferences for Long-Acting Injectable HIV PrEP and Other PrEP Modalities among Sexual Minority Men in Nigeria, Africa

Sexual minority men (SMM) in Nigeria have been disproportionately affected by HIV. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) reduces risk for HIV acquisition among SMM by over 90%. The current study investigated the association between demographics, socioeconomic marginalization, sexual health and willingness to use long-acting injectable (LAI-) PrEP and preferences for other PrEP modalities in a sample of HIV-negative SMM in Nigeria. Between March and June 2019, SMM residing in Abuja, Delta, Lagos, and Plateau completed a quantitative survey. To examine willingness to use LAI-PrEP and PrEP modality preferences, multivariable binomial and multinomial logistic regression models were fit. We found that 88% were willing to use LAI-PrEP and 44% preferred LAI-PrEP to other PrEP modalities. Participants who reported interest in LAI-PrEP were more likely to be single, engage in inconsistent condom use, and report having a primary care provider. Compared to participants who preferred daily oral PrEP, participants who preferred other PrEP modalities had higher odds of having some university education/university degree or higher and reporting low financial hardship. It is imperative that SMM in Nigeria are prioritized for access to new HIV prevention interventions, as they bear a disproportionate burden of HIV and are especially vulnerable to HIV infection.

Performance of PCR-based syndromic testing compared to bacterial culture in patients with suspected pneumonia applying microscopy for quality assessment

Syndromic testing for lower respiratory tract infections with BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel Plus (BF) detects 27 pathogens with a turn-around-time of one hour. We compared the performance of BF with culture. Samples from 298 hospitalized patients with suspected pneumonia routinely sent for culture were also analyzed using BF. Retrospectively, patients were clinically categorized as having "pneumonia" or "no pneumonia." BF and culture were compared by analytical performance, which was evaluated by pathogen concordance, and by clinical performance by comparing pathogen detections in patients with and without pneumonia. The BF results for viruses and atypical bacteria were not included in the performance analysis. In 298 patient samples, BF and culture detected 285 and 142 potential pathogens, respectively. Positive percent agreement (PPA) was 88% (125/142). In patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), clinical sensitivity was 70% and 51%, and specificity was 43% and 71% for BF and culture, respectively. In patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia, the corresponding numbers were 55% and 23%, and 47% and 68%. There was no significant improvement of performance, when only high-quality sputum samples were considered. Efficacy of both BF and culture was low. Both tests are best used in CAP patients for whom the diagnosis has already been clinically established. Indiscriminate use may be clinically misleading and a cause of improper use of antibiotics.

Promises and challenges: cabotegravir for preexposure prophylaxis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tenofovir-based oral PrEP has been effective in reducing population-level HIV incidence in multiple settings, although disparities remain. Injectable cabotegravir-based PrEP is an alternative that may be attractive to individuals with adherence challenges or who do not desire to take a daily medication. We review promises and challenges of cabotegravir-based PrEP.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cabotegravir has demonstrated higher effectiveness than oral PrEP in two randomized trials, with a hazard ratio of 0.31 for HIV incidence among MSM and transgender women across multiple settings [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.62] and 0.11 for cisgender women in sub-Saharan Africa (95% CI 0.040.32). Cabotegravir was also highly effective among populations with disproportionate HIV incidence. Although cabotegravir breakthrough was rare, diagnosis was delayed with use of antigen/antibody-based HIV tests, and resistance occurred with breakthrough infections. Implementation will need to overcome several challenges, including HIV RNA laboratory monitoring not being widely available, requirement for additional staff time and clinic space, and need to provide oral medication during interruptions in dosing.

SUMMARY

Cabotegravir-based PrEP is a highly effective additional PrEP option that will expand HIV prevention options. For successful roll-out, strategies for streamlined and accessible delivery of cabotegravir in real-world settings will need to be developed.

Disparities In Uptake Of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among California Medicaid Enrollees

One of the pillars of efforts in the US to curb HIV incidence is pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We examined racial/ethnic and sex disparities in PrEP uptake among California Medicaid enrollees. Claims data from 2019 identified enrollees and PrEP users in each racial/ethnic, sex, and age group, yielding crude uptake rates. We then predicted age-adjusted uptake rates from multivariable logit regressions and divided PrEP uptake estimates by each group's number of new HIV diagnoses to estimate PrEP-to-need ratios. Predicted uptake was highest for White (0.29 percent) and Black (0.23 percent) males and lowest (0.16 percent) for Hispanic males. Rates for males exceeded those for females; however, Black females had twice the rate of PrEP uptake of White females. Black males and females and Hispanic males had PrEP-to-need ratios that were less than one-third (4.0-6.3) those of Asian and White males and females (14.4-19.9). Low PrEP use rates and disparities in uptake threaten efforts to end the HIV epidemic. Policy makers must craft the rollout of innovations such as PrEP in a manner that narrows HIV disparities instead of widening them.