Noninferiority of miltefosine versus meglumine antimoniate for cutaneous leishmaniasis in children

Tolerability and Safety of Miltefosine for the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

Miltefosine, an orally administered drug, is an important component of the therapeutic arsenal against visceral and mucosal forms of leishmaniasis. However, data regarding the safety and tolerability of miltefosine treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) are relatively limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerability, safety, and adverse events (AEs) of miltefosine treatment in patients with CL. In this cohort study, we reviewed the medical records of all miltefosine-treated patients between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2022, at Israel Defense Forces military dermatology clinics and the dermatology and Tropical Medicine Clinics at Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel. A total of 68 patients (54 males, 79%) with a median age of 30.3 ± 15.6 years (range: 18-88) were included in this study. Leishmania species were identified as L. major (n = 37, 54.4%), L. tropica (n = 12, 17.6%), L. braziliensis (n = 18, 26.5%), and L. infantum (n = 1, 1.5%) using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Miltefosine tablets were administered orally at a dose of 50 mg, three times daily, for 28 days. Overall, 44 patients (65%) completed the 28-day treatment, and the remaining patients required dose reduction or early discontinuation of treatment. AEs (of any degree) were common, reported in 91% of patients. Both previously reported and previously unreported AEs were documented. Gastrointestinal symptoms (66.1%) and malaise (23.5%) typically occurred during the first two weeks of treatment and tended to subside. Other AEs, including acute renal failure (20.6%), sudden and severe pleuritic chest pain (7.6%), acne exacerbation (11.8%), suppuration of CL lesions (17.8%), and AEs related to the male genitourinary system (39.6% of males), typically occurred towards the end of treatment. The latter included testicular pain, epididymitis, diminution or complete absence of ejaculate, inability to orgasm, and impotence. Severe AEs necessitated treatment discontinuation (29.4%) or hospitalization (10.3%). URTI-like symptoms, arthritis, cutaneous eruption, pruritus, and laboratory abnormalities were also observed. Overall, the cure rate (for all patients combined) evaluated 3 months after the completion of treatment was 60%. The tolerability of miltefosine treatment for CL is low. Close clinical and laboratory monitoring is required during treatment, as severe AEs are not uncommon. As new insights regarding its toxicities emerge, further studies are required to define the role of miltefosine in the treatment of CL.

Effect of pentavalent antimony compounds on the inflammatory, hematological and biochemical parameters in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate how systemic antimony treatment in cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) patients affects biochemical, hematological, and inflammatory parameters in child and adult patient groups.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients (29 adults, 21 children) who received systemic meglumine antimonate (MA) treatment in the skin and venereal diseases clinic between September 2022 and January 2024 and were diagnosed with CL by microscopic examination were included in the study. The medical records of the patients were examined retrospectively. Before and after treatment, neutrophil count, leukocyte count, lymphocyte count, hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), mean platelet volume (MPV), amylase, lipase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels were recorded.

RESULTS

In the children group, lymphocyte and platelet values decreased statistically significantly; and lipase value increased statistically significantly after treatment. In the adult group; hemoglobin, neutrophil, lymphocyte and leukocyte values decreased statistically significantly; ALT, AST, amylase, lipase, NLR and PLR values increased statistically significantly after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Based on the data in our study, it was stated that systemic meglumine antimonate treatment may lead to an increase in pancreatic enzymes and transaminases and bone marrow suppression. We also think that patients in the adult age group should be followed more closely regarding pancreatic enzymes and kidney function tests than the pediatric age group.

Characterisation of an area of coexistent visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis transmission in the State of Piauí, Brazil

BACKGROUND

In Brazil, transmission of visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis has expanded geographically over the last decades, with both clinical forms occurring simultaneously in the same area.

OBJECTIVES

This study characterised the clinical, spatial, and temporal distribution, and performed entomological surveillance and natural infection analysis of a leishmaniasis-endemic area.

METHODS

In order to characterise the risk of leishmaniasis transmission in Altos, Piauí, we described the clinical and socio-demographic variables and the spatial and temporal distribution of cases of American visceral leishmaniasis (AVL) and American cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL) cases and identified potential phlebotomine vectors.

FINDINGS

The urban area concentrated almost 54% of ACL and 86.8% of AVL cases. The temporal and spatial distribution of AVL and ACL cases in Altos show a reduction in the number of risk areas, but the presence of permanent disease transmission foci is observed especially in the urban area. 3,808 phlebotomine specimens were captured, with Lutzomyia longipalpis as the most frequent species (98.45%). Of the 35 females assessed for natural infection, one specimen of Lu. longipalpis tested positive for the presence of Leishmania infantum and Leishmania braziliensis DNA.

MAIN CONCLUSION

Our results indicate the presence of risk areas for ACL and AVL in the municipality of Altos and highlight the importance of entomological surveillance to further understand a possible role of Lu. longipalpis in ACL transmission.

Tackling Drug Resistance and Other Causes of Treatment Failure in Leishmaniasis

Leishmaniasis is a tropical infectious disease caused by the protozoan Leishmania parasite. The disease is transmitted by female sand flies and, depending on the infecting parasite species, causes either cutaneous (stigmatizing skin lesions), mucocutaneous (destruction of mucous membranes of nose, mouth and throat) or visceral disease (a potentially fatal infection of liver, spleen and bone marrow). Although more than 1 million new cases occur annually, chemotherapeutic options are limited and their efficacy is jeopardized by increasing treatment failure rates and growing drug resistance. To delay the emergence of resistance to existing and new drugs, elucidating the currently unknown causes of variable drug efficacy (related to parasite susceptibility, host immunity and drug pharmacokinetics) and improved use of genotypic and phenotypic tools to define, measure and monitor resistance in the field are critical. This review highlights recent progress in our understanding of drug action and resistance in Leishmania, ongoing challenges (including setbacks related to the COVID-19 pandemic) and provides an overview of possible strategies to tackle this public health challenge.

Pentoxifylline in the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Colombia

Addition of the immunomodulator pentoxifylline (PTX) to antimonial treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis has shown increased efficacy. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated whether addition of pentoxifylline to meglumine antimoniate (MA) treatment improves therapeutic response in cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) patients. Seventy-three patients aged 18−65 years, having multiple lesions or a single lesion ≥ 3 cm were randomized to receive: intramuscular MA (20 mg/kg/day × 20 days) plus oral PTX 400 mg thrice daily (intervention arm, n = 36) or MA plus placebo (control arm, n = 37), between 2012 and 2015. Inflammatory gene expression was evaluated by RT-qPCR in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from trial patients, before and after treatment. Intention-to-treat failure rate was 35% for intervention vs. 25% for control (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.21−1.71). Per-protocol failure rate was 32% for PTX, and 24% for placebo (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.13−1.97). No differences in frequency or severity of adverse events were found (PTX = 142 vs. placebo = 140). Expression of inflammatory mediators was unaltered by addition of PTX to MA. However, therapeutic failure was associated with significant overexpression of il1β and ptgs2 (p < 0.05), irrespective of study group. No clinical benefit of addition of PTX to standard treatment was detected in early mild to moderate CL caused by Leishmania (V.) panamensis.

Potency and preclinical evidence of synergy of oral azole drugs and miltefosine in an ex vivo model of Leishmania (Viannia) panamensis infection

Failure of treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with antimonial drugs and miltefosine is frequent. Use of oral combination therapy represents an attractive strategy to increase efficacy of treatment and reduce the risk of drug resistance. We evaluated the potency of posaconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole and fluconazole, and the potential synergy of those demonstrating the highest potency, in combination with miltefosine (HePC), against infection with Leishmania (Viannia) panamensis. Synergistic activity was determined by isobolograms and calculation of Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index (FICI), based on parasite quantification using an ex vivo model of human PBMCs infected with a luciferase-transfected, antimony and miltefosine sensitive line of L. panamensis. The drug combination and concentrations that displayed synergy were then evaluated for anti-leishmanial effect in 10 clinical strains of L. panamensis by qRT-PCR of Leishmania 7SLRNA. High potency was substantiated for posaconazole and itraconazole against sensitive as well as HePC and antimony resistant lines of L. panamensis, whereas fluconazole and voriconazole displayed low potency. HePC combined with posaconazole (Poz) demonstrated evidence of synergy at free drug concentrations achieved in plasma during treatment (2 μM HePC + 4 μM Poz). FICI, based on 70% and 90% reduction of infection, was 0.5 for the sensitive line. Combination of 2 μM HePC + 4 μM Poz effected significantly greater reduction of infection by clinical strains of L. panamensis than individual drugs. Orally administrable miltefosine/posaconazole combinations demonstrated synergistic anti-leishmanial capacity ex vivo against L. panamensis, supporting their potential as a novel therapeutic strategy to improve efficacy, and effectiveness of treatment.

Neutrophil Activation: Influence of Antimony Tolerant and Susceptible Clinical Strains of L. (V.) panamensis and Meglumine Antimoniate

Emerging evidence indicates that innate host response contributes to the therapeutic effect of antimicrobial medications. Recent studies have shown that Leishmania parasites derived by in vitro selection for resistance to pentavalent antimony (SbV) as meglumine antimoniate (MA) modulate the activation of neutrophils. However, whether modulation of neutrophil activation extends to natural resistance to this antileishmanial drug has not been established. We have evaluated the influence of clinical strains of L. (V.) panamensis having intrinsic tolerance/resistance to SbV, on the inflammatory response of neutrophils during ex vivo exposure to MA. Accordingly, neutrophils obtained from healthy donors were infected with clinical strains that are sensitive (n = 10) or intrinsically tolerant/resistant to SbV (n = 10) and exposed to a concentration approximating the maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) of SbV (32 µg/ml). The activation profile of neutrophils was evaluated as the expression of the surface membrane markers CD66b, CD18, and CD62L by flow cytometry, measurement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by luminometry, and NET formation using Picogreen to measure dsDNA release and quantification of NETs by confocal microscopy. These parameters of activation were analyzed in relation with parasite susceptibility to SbV and exposure to MA. Here, we show that clinical strains presenting intrinsic tolerance/resistance to SbV induced significantly lower ROS production compared to drug-sensitive clinical strains, both in the presence and in the absence of MA. Likewise, analyses of surface membrane activation markers revealed significantly higher expression of CD62L on cells infected with intrinsically SbV tolerant/resistant L. (V.) panamensis than cells infected with drug-sensitive strains. Expression of other activation markers (CD18 and CD66b) and NET formation were similar for neutrophils infected with SbV sensitive and tolerant clinical strains under the conditions evaluated. Exposure to MA broadly impacted the activation of neutrophils, diminishing NET formation and the expression of CD62L, while augmenting ROS production and CD66b expression, independently of the parasite susceptibility phenotype. These results demonstrated that activation of human neutrophils ex vivo is differentially modulated by infection with clinical strains of L. (V.) panamensis having intrinsic tolerance/resistance to SbV compared to sensitive strains, and by exposure to antimonial drug.

Comparative assessment of interventions for treating cutaneous leishmaniasis: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Various interventions including laser therapy, heat therapy, and several drugs have been trialed in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis. Due to the lack of an evidence-based comparison of all these interventions, we carried out the present network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of any interventions in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis. The proportion of patients with complete cure was the primary outcome. The proportion of lesions cured at the end of treatment, the proportion of lesions with minimal/no response to treatment, and proportion of wounds with minimal/no change were the secondary outcomes. Random-effects modeling was used for generating pooled estimates. Rankogram plot was used for identifying the 'best intervention'. For interventions containing a combination of treatments, backslash (/) has been used for depicting the same.

RESULTS

One-hundred and thirty-one studies were included. Intralesional meglumine, topical paromomycin/gentamicin, topical paromomycin, parenteral sodium stibogluconate, topical honey/intralesional meglumine, topical liposomal amphotericin B, oral zinc sulphate, oral miltefosine, parenteral meglumine, heat therapy, topical liposomal azithromycin, intralesional meglumine/silver dressing, intralesional sodium stibogluconate, parenteral meglumine/intralesional meglumine, oral allopurinol/parenteral meglumine, topical trichloroacetic acid/heat therapy, oral zinc sulphate/oral ketoconazole, topical imiquimod/cryotherapy, intralesional meglumine/cryotherapy, topical herbal extract of Z-HE, parenteral pentamidine, topical trichloroacetic acid/intralesional meglumine, carbon-dioxide laser, topical recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/parenteral meglumine, intralesional dapsone, carbon-dioxide laser/intralesional meglumine, moist wet dressing with sodium hypochlorite, parenteral sodium stibogluconate/intralesional recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, oral dapsone, intralesional sodium stibogluconate/oral ketoconazole, intralesional sodium stibogluconate/parenteral sodium stibogluconate and electrocautery/moist wet dressing with sodium hypochlorite were observed with significantly greater proportion of patients with complete cure compared to placebo/untreated controls. Rankogram analysis revealed that parenteral pentamidine has the highest statistical probability of being the best in the pool.

CONCLUSION

We observed several interventions to be effective for treating cutaneous leishmaniasis. However, greater caution is required in interpreting the results as the estimates are likely to change with the advent of results from future studies.

Miltefosine for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis-A pilot study from Ethiopia

Background

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Ethiopia, caused by Leishmania aethiopica, is often severe and hard to treat compared to CL caused by other species elsewhere. Miltefosine is the only oral anti-leishmanial drug, with a favorable side-effect profile compared to routinely available sodium stibogluconate (SSG), but evidence about its use for L. aethiopica is lacking.

Methodology and principal findings

In an observational cohort study, treatment outcomes, safety and adherence among CL patients who required systemic treatment and received miltefosine for 28 days in Boru Meda Hospital and University of Gondar Hospital were studied. Patient cure was defined as 100% flattening for non-ulcerated lesions and 100% flattening and 100% re-epithelization for ulcerated lesions. Outcomes were documented for day 28, 90 and 180, both per site, and pooled, adjusting for site as a fixed effect with effect coding. Among 94 included patients (32 in Gondar, 62 in Boru Meda), median lesion duration was 12 months, median size six cm, and mucosal involvement (46.8%) and diffuse (30.9%) lesions were common. Adherence to miltefosine was good, and side-effects were tolerable. Initial outcomes at day 28 were promising, with 68.8% and 94.0% of patients having good improvement or cure in Gondar and Boru Meda respectively. In Boru Meda, outcomes were good with 72.7% and 72.9% cure at day 90 and day 180 respectively. In Gondar, results were less promising, with only 12.5% and 26.7% cure at day 90 and day 180, although confidence intervals were wide. In pooled estimates, 48.7% of patients reached cure at day 180, and 32.3% relapsed. Outcomes were better in Boru Meda Hospital, for smaller lesions and for mucosal lesions.

Conclusions/Significance

Based on miltefosine’s good initial response, tolerable side-effects, tablet-form, we propose to include miltefosine for future clinical trials using extended treatment schedules, combination therapy, or targeting specific subgroups.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04004754.

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Ethiopia is caused by Leishmania aethiopica, resulting in relatively severe lesions, which are hard to treat. Currently, most patients are treated with pentavalent antimonials, although effectiveness seems poor, with many patients requiring repeated treatment cycles before good response is seen. Miltefosine is the only oral drug available for leishmaniasis treatment and has a good safety profile compared to other treatment options. Although evidence on the use of miltefosine for CL in other regions looks promising, reports from Ethiopia are lacking.

We systematically recorded outcomes and side-effects for patients with CL lesions that required systemic treatment and who were treated with 28 days of miltefosine in a prospective study in two hospitals in Ethiopia. Side-effects were common but generally mild. Although all patients showed improvement after 28 days, overall, around half of patients were cured after six months, with relapse being common. Therefore, we propose to include miltefosine in future clinical trials, but to adapt the treatment regimen using combination therapy or treatment extension to improve overall outcomes and reduce relapse.

Case Report: Cutaneous Leishmaniasis due to Leishmania (Viannia) panamensis in Two Travelers Successfully Treated with Miltefosine

We present two cases of Leishmania (V) panamensis in returning travelers from Central America successfully treated with miltefosine. The couple presented with ulcerative skin lesions nonresponsive to antibiotics. Skin biopsy with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) revealed L. (V) panamensis. To prevent the development of mucosal disease and avoid the inconvenience of parental therapy, we treated both patients with oral miltefosine. We suggest that miltefosine represents an important therapeutic alternative in the treatment of cutaneous lesions caused by L. panamensis and in preventing mucosal involvement.

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Treated with Miltefosine: A Case Series of 10 Paediatric Patients

Cutaneous leishmaniasis poses a therapeutic challenge in the paediatric population. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of miltefosine treatment for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis in paediatric patients. A multicentre retrospective review of 10 children (≤ 18 years of age) with cutaneous leishmaniasis treated with miltefosine in Israel was performed. Mean ± standard deviation age at diagnosis was 9.1 ± 5.0 years. The Leishmania species diagnosed was L. tropica in 8 cases and Leishmania major in 2 cases. Mean ± standard deviation duration of treatment was 44.8 ± 20.6 days, with a mean follow-up period of 12.1 ± 17.1 months. Complete response was noted in 8 (80%) patients. Treatment failure was noted in 2 (20%) cases. Side-effects related to the medication were minimal. In conclusion, oral miltefosine may be an effective and safe treatment for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania tropica or Leishmania major in children. However, further studies are warranted to draw a definite conclusion.

Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis

BACKGROUND

On the American continent, cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (CL and MCL) are diseases associated with infection by several species of Leishmania parasites. Pentavalent antimonials remain the first-choice treatment. There are alternative interventions, but reviewing their effectiveness and safety is important as availability is limited. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions for all immuno-competent people who have American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (ACML).

SEARCH METHODS

We updated our database searches of the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and CINAHL to August 2019. We searched five trials registers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing either single or combination treatments for ACML in immuno-competent people, diagnosed by clinical presentation and Leishmania infection confirmed by smear, culture, histology, or polymerase chain reaction on a biopsy specimen. The comparators were either no treatment, placebo only, or another active compound.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our key outcomes were the percentage of participants 'cured' at least three months after the end of treatment, adverse effects, and recurrence. We used GRADE to assess evidence certainty for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 75 studies (37 were new), totalling 6533 randomised participants with ATL. The studies were mainly conducted in Central and South America at regional hospitals, local healthcare clinics, and research centres. More male participants were included (mean age: roughly 28.9 years (SD: 7.0)). The most common confirmed species were L. braziliensis, L. panamensis, and L. mexicana. The most assessed interventions and comparators were non-antimonial systemics (particularly oral miltefosine) and antimonials (particularly meglumine antimoniate (MA), which was also a common intervention), respectively. Three studies included moderate-to-severe cases of mucosal leishmaniasis but none included cases with diffuse cutaneous or disseminated CL, considered the severe cutaneous form. Lesions were mainly ulcerative and located in the extremities and limbs. The follow-up (FU) period ranged from 28 days to 7 years. All studies had high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain (especially performance bias). None of the studies reported the degree of functional or aesthetic impairment, scarring, or quality of life. Compared to placebo, at one-year FU, intramuscular (IM) MA given for 20 days to treat L. braziliensis and L. panamensis infections in ACML may increase the likelihood of complete cure (risk ratio (RR) 4.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 21.38; 2 RCTs, 157 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but may also make little to no difference, since the 95% CI includes the possibility of both increased and reduced healing (cure rates), and IMMA probably increases severe adverse effects such as myalgias and arthralgias (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.96; 1 RCT, 134 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). IMMA may make little to no difference to the recurrence risk, but the 95% CI includes the possibility of both increased and reduced risk (RR 1.79, 95% CI 0.17 to 19.26; 1 RCT, 127 participants; low-certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, at six-month FU, oral miltefosine given for 28 days to treat L. mexicana, L. panamensis and L. braziliensis infections in American cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL) probably improves the likelihood of complete cure (RR 2.25, 95% CI 1.42 to 3.38), and probably increases nausea rates (RR 3.96, 95% CI 1.49 to 10.48) and vomiting (RR 6.92, 95% CI 2.68 to 17.86) (moderate-certainty evidence). Oral miltefosine may make little to no difference to the recurrence risk (RR 2.97, 95% CI 0.37 to 23.89; low-certainty evidence), but the 95% CI includes the possibility of both increased and reduced risk (all based on 1 RCT, 133 participants). Compared to IMMA, at 6 to 12 months FU, oral miltefosine given for 28 days to treat L. braziliensis, L. panamensis, L. guyanensis and L. amazonensis infections in ACML may make little to no difference to the likelihood of complete cure (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.23; 7 RCTs, 676 participants; low-certainty evidence). Based on moderate-certainty evidence (3 RCTs, 464 participants), miltefosine probably increases nausea rates (RR 2.45, 95% CI 1.72 to 3.49) and vomiting (RR 4.76, 95% CI 1.82 to 12.46) compared to IMMA. Recurrence risk was not reported. For the rest of the key comparisons, recurrence risk was not reported, and risk of adverse events could not be estimated. Compared to IMMA, at 6 to 12 months FU, oral azithromycin given for 20 to 28 days to treat L. braziliensis infections in ACML probably reduces the likelihood of complete cure (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.76; 2 RCTs, 93 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Compared to intravenous MA (IVMA) and placebo, at 12 month FU, adding topical imiquimod to IVMA, given for 20 days to treat L. braziliensis, L. guyanensis and L. peruviana infections in ACL probably makes little to no difference to the likelihood of complete cure (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.80; 1 RCT, 80 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Compared to MA, at 6 months FU, one session of local thermotherapy to treat L. panamensis and L. braziliensis infections in ACL reduces the likelihood of complete cure (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.95; 1 RCT, 292 participants; high-certainty evidence). Compared to IMMA and placebo, at 26 weeks FU, adding oral pentoxifylline to IMMA to treat CL (species not stated) probably makes little to no difference to the likelihood of complete cure (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.18; 1 RCT, 70 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence certainty was mostly moderate or low, due to methodological shortcomings, which precluded conclusive results. Overall, both IMMA and oral miltefosine probably result in an increase in cure rates, and nausea and vomiting are probably more common with miltefosine than with IMMA. Future trials should investigate interventions for mucosal leishmaniasis and evaluate recurrence rates of cutaneous leishmaniasis and its progression to mucosal disease.

Profiles of Local and Systemic Inflammation in the Outcome of Treatment of Human Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Caused by Leishmania (Viannia)

The immune mechanisms that contribute to the efficacy of treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to define immune correlates of the outcome of treatment of CL caused by Leishmania (Viannia) species during standard of care treatment with pentavalent antimonials. We conducted a comparative expression profiling of immune response genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and lesion biopsy specimens obtained from CL patients before and at the end of treatment (EoT) with meglumine antimoniate. The ex vivo response of PBMCs to L (V) panamensis partially reflected that of lesion microenvironments. Significant downregulation of gene expression profiles consistent with local innate immune responses (monocyte and neutrophil activation and chemoattractant molecules) was observed at EoT in biopsy specimens of patients who cured (n = 8), compared to those from patients with treatment failure (n = 8). Among differentially expressed genes, pretreatment expression of CCL2 was significantly predictive of the therapeutic response (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.82, P = 0.02). Polymorphisms in regulatory regions of the CCL2 promoter were analyzed in a pilot cohort of DNA samples from CL patients (cures, n = 20, and treatment failure, n = 20), showing putative association of polymorphisms rs13900(C/T) and rs2857656(G/C) with treatment outcome. Our data indicate that dampening gene expression profiles of monocyte and neutrophil activation characterize clinical cure after treatment of CL, supporting participation of parasite-sustained inflammation or deregulated innate immune responses in treatment failure.

Synthesis and biological evaluation of thiazole derivatives as LbSOD inhibitors

Leishmaniasis is considered as one of the major neglected tropical diseases due to its magnitude and wide geographic distribution. Leishmania braziliensis, responsible for cutaneous leishmaniasis, is the most prevalent species in Brazil. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) belongs to the antioxidant pathway of the parasites and human host. Despite the differences between SOD of Leishmania braziliensis and human make this enzyme a promising target for drug development efforts. No medicinal chemistry effort has been made to identify LbSOD inhibitors. Herein, we show that thermal shift assays (TSA) and fluorescent protein-labeled assays (FPLA) can be employed as primary and secondary screens to achieve this goal. Moreover, we show that thiazole derivatives bind to LbSOD with micromolar affinity.

A Clinicoepidemiological Study of Pediatric Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Sinjar Province, Iraq

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a major health problem worldwide. Although CL is a common disease among children, treatment regimens for the pediatric age group are based on extrapolation of efficacy data in adults. The present study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcome of CL in preschool-age children and the factors influencing the outcome. Two hundred ninety-four children were diagnosed with CL between December 2018 and March 2019 in Sinjar Province, Iraq. All patients were treated with intralesional injections of sodium stibogluconate and followed up for 3 months after the completion of treatment. The treatment success rate was 99% (291/294). A statistically significant association was found between the number of doses per lesion and the number of lesions (P = 0.002; CI = 0.066-0.2875). No association was found between the number of lesions, age, gender, or the presence of livestock and the treatment outcome. In conclusion, treatment success rate was high with the use of intralesional injection of sodium stibogluconate. A significant association was found between the number of lesions and the number of doses. Further studies are required to assess the treatment outcome indicators, including the genotype of leishmania.

Major changes in chromosomal somy, gene expression and gene dosage driven by SbIII in Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania panamensis

Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania panamensis are two species clinically and epidemiologically important, among others because of their relative resistance to first-line drugs (antimonials). The precise mechanism underlying the ability of these species to survive antimony treatment remains unknown. Therefore, elucidating the pathways mediating drug resistance is essential. We herein experimentally selected resistance to trivalent antimony (Sb^III) in the reference strains of L. braziliensis (MHOM/BR75/M2904) and L. panamensis (MHOM/COL/81L13) and compared whole genome and transcriptome alterations in the culture promastigote stage. The results allowed us to identify differences in somy, copy number variations in some genes related to antimony resistance and large-scale copy number variations (deletions and duplications) in chromosomes with no somy changes. We found mainly in L. braziliensis, a direct relation between the chromosomal/local copy number variation and the gene expression. We identified differentially expressed genes in the resistant lines that are involved in antimony resistance, virulence, and vital biological processes in parasites. The results of this study may be useful for characterizing the genetic mechanisms of these Leishmania species under antimonial pressure, and for clarifying why the parasites are resistant to first-line drug treatments.

Efficacy of miltefosine compared with glucantime for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is most common form of leishmaniasis and is characterized by ulcerative skin lesions. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials that compared the efficacy of miltefosine and glucantime for the treatment of CL. We searched the following databases: Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform search portal of World Health Organization, Sid, Irandoc, Magiran, and clinicaltrials.gov. We used keywords including “miltefosine,” “glucantime,” and “Leishmania.” The quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A random-effects model was employed for the analysis. We assessed heterogeneity by the chi-square test and the I² index statistic. When heterogeneity was present, meta-regression analyses were performed. The Egger method was used to assess publication bias; when it was significant, the trim-and-fill method was used to test and adjust for publication bias. A total of 1,570 reports were identified, of which 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the meta-analysis, there was no significant difference between the efficacy of miltefosine and glucantime; however, subgroup analysis showed that, regarding parasite species other than Leishmania braziliensis, miltefosine was significantly superior to glucantime (intention to treat; relative risk, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.32). In the meta-regression, only the glucantime injection type was significant at the p=0.1 level. The Egger test found statistically significant publication bias; however, including the 3 missing studies in the trim-and-fill analysis did not change the results. This meta-analysis found that miltefosine seems to be more effective than glucantime, at least in species other than L. braziliensis, for treating CL.

Eligibility for Local Therapies in Adolescents and Adults with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis from Southwestern Colombia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Local therapies have been proposed as safe and effective alternatives to systemic drugs in cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), especially among less severe cases. However, they are not widely available and used in endemic places, including Colombia, which has a high burden of disease. Further complicating the uptake of local therapies is that different treatment guidelines have been established by the World Health Organization (WHO) and Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). Using data from a large referral center in Colombia, we determined the proportion of patients who would be eligible for and potentially benefit from local therapies according to both international guidelines. The sample included 1,891 confirmed cases of CL aged ≥ 12 years, mostly infected with Leishmania Viannia panamensis (91%, n = 601/660), between 2004 and 2014. Overall, 57% of the sample had one lesion, whereas another 31% had two to three lesions. For 74% of patients, all lesions were in an area other than head or neck. The maximum lesion size was ≤ 3 cm for 58% and < 5 cm for 88% of the sample. Based on our data, up to 56% of patients could have been eligible for local therapies according to the WHO criteria. By contrast, only 23% were eligible according to the more restrictive PAHO criteria. Regardless, these data suggest that a substantial proportion of CL patients in Colombia may benefit from local therapies given their relatively mild presentation of disease and low risk of complications. Individualized risk-benefit assessment and guideline adjustments may increase local therapy eligibility and benefit a large number of patients.

Interventions to treat cutaneous leishmaniasis in children: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Case management in children with cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is mainly based on studies performed in adults. We aimed to determine the efficacy and harms of interventions to treat CL in children.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials and cohort studies, assessing treatments of CL in children (≤12 years old). We performed structured searches in PubMed, CENTRAL, LILACS, SciELO, Scopus, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), clinicaltrials.gov and Google Scholar. No restrictions regarding ethnicity, country, sex or year of publication were applied. Languages were limited to English, Spanish and Portuguese. Two reviewers screened articles, completed the data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. A qualitative summary of the included studies was performed.

RESULTS

We identified 1092 records, and included 8 manuscripts (6 Randomized Clinical Trials [RCT] and 2 non-randomized studies). Most of the articles excluded in full-text review did not report outcomes separately for children. In American CL (ACL), 5 studies evaluated miltefosine and/or meglumine antimoniate (MA). Their efficacy varied from 68-83% and 17-69%, respectively. In Old-World CL (OWCL), two studies evaluated systemic therapies: rifampicin and MA; and one study assessed efficacy of cryotherapy (42%, Per Protocol [PP]) vs intralesional MA (72%, PP). Few studies (4) provided information on adverse events (AEs) for children, and no serious AEs were reported in participants. Risk of bias was generally low to unclear in ACL studies, and unclear to high in OWCL studies.

CONCLUSION

Information on efficacy of treatment for CL in children is scarce. There is an unmet need to develop specific formulations, surveillance of AEs, and guidelines both for the management of CL and clinical trials involving the pediatric population.

REGISTRATION

The protocol of this review was registered in the PROSPERO International register of systematic reviews, number CRD42017062164.

Exploring how non-inferiority and equivalence are assessed in paediatrics: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To review characteristics, methodology and reporting of non-inferiority and equivalence trials in the specific context of paediatrics.

DESIGN

PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched (up to September 2016) for non-inferiority/equivalence randomised controlled trials conducted in children published in high-impact-factor journals (>5.0 for general/specialist medical journals; >2.2 for paediatric journals).

RESULTS

We found that the statistical hypothesis was inconsistent with the objective in 12 (10%) of the 125 reports included. Non-inferiority (n=98) and equivalence trials (n=27) were mostly used to evaluate interventions with easier administration (45%, n=54/120) and/or better safety profile (34%, n=41/120). All the data needed for targeted sample size recalculation were available for 39 reports (31%). The margin-representing the largest difference between arms that would be clinically acceptable-was reported in 119 (95%), and 44/119 (37%) reported the method used for margin determination. The median sample size was 268 (IQR 125-531). Margins were wider in smaller trials (<125 randomised patients) than in larger trials (p=0.04/p<0.01 for binary/continuous outcomes, respectively). We did not agree with the authors' conclusions in 11% (11/103) of the reports that provided sufficient information.

CONCLUSIONS

There is still a need to improve the quality of methodology, reporting and interpretation of non-inferiority/equivalence trials in paediatrics. In particular, the margins were often not justified and the conclusion was often not supported by the design and/or the results. As researchers have to cope with small sample size and with lack of evidence, methods for non-inferiority/equivalence trials need to be used and/or developed in this vulnerable population.

The Binomial Parasite-Host Immunity in the Healing Process and in Reactivation of Human Tegumentary Leishmaniasis

Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne infectious disease caused by different species of protozoa from the Leishmania genus. Classically, the disease can be classified into two main clinical forms: Visceral (VL) and Tegumentary (TL) leishmaniasis. TL is a skin/mucosal granulomatous disease that manifests mainly as cutaneous localized or disseminated ulcers, papules diffusely distributed, mucosal lesions or atypical lesions. Once the etiology of the infection is confirmed, treatment can take place, and different drugs can be administered. It has already been shown that, even when the scar is clinically evident, inflammation is still present in the native tissue, and the decrease of the inflammatory process occurs slowly during the 1st years after clinical healing. The maintenance of residual parasites in the scar tissue is also well documented. Therefore, it is no longer a surprise that, under some circumstances, therapeutic failure and/or lesion reactivation occurs. All over the years, an impressive amount of data on relapses, treatment resistance and lesion reactivation after healing has been collected, and several factors have been pointed out as having a role in the process. Different factors such as Leishmania species, parasite variability, Leishmania RNA virus 1, parasite load, parasite persistence, age, nutritional status, gender, co-morbidities, co-infection, pregnancy, immunosuppression, lesion duration, number and localization of lesions, drug metabolism, irregular treatment and individual host cellular immune response were described and discussed in the present review. Unfortunately, despite this amount of information, a conclusive understanding remains under construction. In addition, multifactorial influence cannot be discarded. In this context, knowing why leishmaniasis has been difficult to treat and control can help the development of new approaches, such as drugs and immunotherapy in order to improve healing maintenance. In this sense, we would like to highlight some of the findings that may influence the course of Leishmania infection and the therapeutic response, with an emphasis on TL.

Why miltefosine-a life-saving drug for leishmaniasis-is unavailable to people who need it the most

Miltefosine, the only oral drug approved for the treatment of leishmaniasis-a parasitic disease transmitted by sandflies-is considered as a success story of research and development (R&D) by a public-private partnership (PPP). It epitomises the multiple market failures faced by a neglected disease drug: patients with low ability to pay, neglect by authorities and uncertain market size. Originally developed as an anticancer agent in the 1990s, the drug was registered in India in 2002 to treat the fatal visceral leishmaniasis. At the time, miltefosine was considered a breakthrough in the treatment, making it feasible to eliminate a regional disease. Today, access to miltefosine remains far from secure. The initial PPP agreement which includes access to the public sector is not enforced. The reality on the ground has been challenging: shortages due to inefficient supply chains, and use of a substandard product which led to a high number of treatment failures and deaths. Miltefosine received orphan drug status in the USA; when it was registered there in 2014, a priority review voucher (PRV) was awarded. The PRV, meant to facilitate drug development for neglected disease, was subsequently sold to another company for US$125 million without, to date, any apparent impact on drug access. At the heart of these concerns are questions on how to protect societal benefit of a drug developed with public investment, while clinicians worldwide struggle with its lack of affordability, limited availability and sustainability of access. This article analyses the reasons behind the postregistration access failure of miltefosine and provides the lessons learnt.

Eligibility criteria and outcome measures adopted in clinical trials of treatments of cutaneous leishmaniasis: systematic literature review covering the period 1991-2015

OBJECTIVE

To document the sources of heterogeneity in outcomes and shortcomings in trial designs reported by previous systematic reviews.

METHODS

Systematic review of clinical trials of CL treatments published since 1991, to assess and compare eligibility criteria and outcome measures in trials (any type of treatment) of CL (any form) reported before and after the publication of the CONSORT statement.

RESULTS

We identified 106 eligible trials published between 1991 and 2015, 74% after the 2001 CONSORT statement; 58% (n = 63) were on Old-World CL and 37% (n = 40) in New-World CL; overall, 11 531 patients enrolled in 243 treatment groups on 30 different treatments. Both requirements and definitions for eligibility and outcome criteria varied. Compliance with CONSORT requirements increased for studies published after the 2010 update. As for entry criteria, 94% of studies had a requirement for sex (74% of those enrolling also women excluded those who were pregnant or lactating), 69% for age (variable age ranges), 99% parasitological confirmation, 43% prior duration of illness (14% excluded cases with previous episodes), 46% defined the number, 28% the size and 13% the type of lesions (27% with restrictions as to their anatomical location). Follow-up ranged 1-24 months, with 14% and 91% of studies, respectively, having defined initial and final cure.

CONCLUSIONS

This review documents changes in reporting before and after the publication of the CONSORT statement. Lack of standardisation, compounded with the small number of trials relative to the magnitude of the disease in its multiple forms, and with the range of treatments tested explains why evidence to inform treatment guidelines is generally weak for CL. Adopting standardised methodologies will improve the quality and consistency of clinical trials, and ultimately yield better treatments for CL.

Failure of fluconazole in treating cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania guyanensis in the Brazilian Amazon: An open, nonrandomized phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The treatment of Leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis is based on a weak strength of evidence from very few clinical trials and some case series reports. Current treatment guidelines recommend pentamidine isethionate or meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime) as the first-line choices. Both are parenteral drugs with a low therapeutic indexes leading to a high risk of undesired effects. Imidazole derivatives interfere with the production of leishmanial ergosterol, an essential component of their membrane structure. One drug that has been studied in different clinical presentations of Leishmania is fluconazole, a hydrophilic bis-triazole, which is easily absorbed through the oral route with a low toxicity profile and is considered safe for children. This drug is readily available in poor countries with a reasonable cost making it a potential option for treating leishmaniasis.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

An adaptive nonrandomized clinical trial with sequential groups with dose escalation of oral fluconazole was designed to treat adult men with localized cutaneous leishmaniasis (LCL) in Manaus, Brazil. Eligible participants were patients with LCL with confirmed Leishmania guyanensis infection.

RESULTS

Twenty adult male patients were treated with 450 mg of fluconazole daily for 30 days. One patient (5%) was cured within 30 days of treatment. Of the 19 failures (95%), 13 developed a worsening of ulcers and six evolved lymphatic spreading of the disease. Planned dose escalation was suspended after the disappointing failure rate during the first stage of the trial.

CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE

Oral fluconazole, at the dose of 450mg per day, was not efficacious against LCL caused by Leishmania guyanensis in adult men.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Brazilian Clinical Trial Registration (ReBec)-RBR-8w292w; UTN number-1158-2421.

3M-052 as an adjuvant for a PLGA microparticle-based Leishmania donovani recombinant protein vaccine

It is believed that an effective vaccine against leishmaniasis will require a T helper type 1 (T_H 1) immune response. In this study, we investigated the adjuvanticity of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) 7/8 agonist 3M-052 in combination with the Leishmania donovani 36-kDa nucleoside hydrolase recombinant protein antigen (NH36). NH36 and 3M-052 were encapsulated in separate batches of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microparticles (MPs). The loading efficiency for NH36 was 83% and for 3M-052 was above 95%. In vitro stimulation of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells, measured by IL-12 secretion, demonstrated that 3M-052 (free or MP-formulated) had a concentration-dependent immunostimulatory effect with an optimum concentration of 2 µg/mL. In immunogenicity studies in BALB/c mice, MP-formulated NH36 and 3M-052 elicited the highest serum titers of T_H 1-associated IgG2a and IgG2b antibodies and the highest frequency of IFNγ-producing splenocytes. No dose dependency was observed among MP/NH36/3M-052 groups over a dose range of 4-60 µg 3M-052 per injection. The ability of MP-formulated NH36 and 3M-052 to elicit a T_H 1-biased immune response indicates the potential for PLGA MP-formulated 3M-052 to be used as an adjuvant for leishmaniasis vaccines. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 106B: 1587-1594, 2018.

American cutaneous leishmaniasis in infancy and childhood

Infant and young child skin diseases are among the most common features of morbidity throughout the tropics. Because the skin is directly exposed to the environment, it is considerably affected by climatic and local conditions such as vectors and microorganisms, as in the case of leishmaniasis. In America the observed magnitude of cutaneous leishmaniasis in children has led to the study of increased risk of exposure of this group due to the possibility of peri- and intradomiciliary transmission. The present review pretends to make a concrete approach all through the broad and main figures of this parasitic disease, including the clinical, physiopathological, epidemiological, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects, in order to be used as a practical source of reference for pediatricians leading with tropical cutaneous pathology in the region.

Susceptibility to Miltefosine in Brazilian Clinical Isolates of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis

Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis is the main causative species of tegumentary leishmaniasis in Brazil. In this study, we evaluated the susceptibility of 16 clinical isolates of L. (V.) braziliensis from different regions of Brazil to miltefosine in vitro. Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of miltefosine varied from 22.9 to 144.2 μM against promastigotes and from 0.3 to 4.2 μM against intracellular amastigotes. No significant differences were found between isolates of different geographical origins. A clear correlation between the EC₅₀ against promastigotes and amastigotes within each isolate was found. These findings contribute to the evaluation of miltefosine's potential and limitations for the treatment of tegumentary leishmaniasis in Brazil.

Risk factors for therapeutic failure to meglumine antimoniate and miltefosine in adults and children with cutaneous leishmaniasis in Colombia: A cohort study

Introduction

Reports of therapeutic failure to meglumine antimoniate (MA) and miltefosine in cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) varies between species, populations and geographic regions. This study aimed to determine the clinical, drug-related factors, and Leishmania species associated with treatment failure in children and adults with cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Methods

A cohort study was performed with children (2–12 years old) and adults (18–65 years old) with CL, who have participated in clinical studies at CIDEIM Cali, Tumaco and Chaparral. Incidence of therapeutic failure was estimated by treatment and age groups. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed for the complete cohort and pediatric patients.

Results

Two hundred and thirty patients were included (miltefosine: 112; MA: 118), of which 60.4% were children and 83.9% were infected with L.V. panamensis. Overall incidence of therapeutic failure was 15.65% (95%CI: 10.92–20.38), and was lower for miltefosine than for MA (8.92%, 95%CI: 3.59–14.26 versus 22.03%, 95%CI:14.48–29.58, p = 0.006). Treatment failure was associated with age ≤8 years (OR: 3.29; 95%CI: 1.37–7.89), disease duration ≤1 month (OR: 3.29; 95%CI: 1.37–7.89), regional lymphadenopathy (OR: 2.72; 95%CI: 1.10–6.70), treatment with MA (OR: 3.98; 95%CI: 1.66–9.50), and adherence <90% (OR: 3.59; 95%CI: 1.06–12.11). In children, higher Z-score of height/age was a protective factor (OR: 0.58; 95%CI: 0.36–0.93), while treatment with MA was a risk factor (OR: 40.82; 95%CI: 2.45–677.85), demonstrating significant interaction with age (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Clinical and drug-related factors determine therapeutic failure in CL. High risk of failure in children treated with MA indicates the need to reconsider this drug as first line treatment in this population.

Trial registration

Clinical trial registration: NCT00487253

Clinical trial registration: NCT01462500

Clinical trial registration: NCT01464242

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a parasitic disease that causes chronic, often ulcerated, skin lesions. Treatment require administration of systemic and poorly tolerated drugs, of which, the most commonly used is meglumine antimoniate (MA) injections during 20 days. Although children and adults might have different responses to these drugs, Colombian treatment guidelines recommends meglumine antimoniate for all age groups. In this study, we explored the factors that influence the therapeutic response in children and adults with CL treated with MA and miltefosine. We included 230 children and adults in the analysis, and we found that young age (≤8 years old), presence of regional lymphadenopathy, disease duration ≤1 month, poor adherence to treatment (<90%) were associated with increased odds of treatment failure. Additionally, being treated with MA was a risk factor for therapeutic failure, especially for children. A better nutritional status (higher Z-score of height/age) was a protector factor in pediatric patients. These results highlight the urgent need to reconsider MA as first line treatment in children in Colombia and to evaluate better treatment options for this population.

Cost-effectiveness of meglumine antimoniate versus miltefosine caregiver DOT for the treatment of pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis

BACKGROUND

Oral miltefosine has been shown to be non-inferior to first-line, injectable meglumine antimoniate (MA) for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in children. Miltefosine may be administered via in-home caregiver Directly Observed Therapy (cDOT), while patients must travel to clinics to receive MA. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing miltefosine by cDOT versus MA for pediatric CL in southwest Colombia.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE FINDINGS

We developed a Monte Carlo model comparing the cost-per-cure of miltefosine by cDOT compared to MA from patient, government payer, and societal perspectives (societal = sum of patient and government payer perspective costs). Drug effectiveness and adverse events were estimated from clinical trials. Healthcare utilization and costs of travel were obtained from surveys of providers and published sources. The primary outcome was cost-per-cure reported in 2015 USD. Treatment efficacy, costs, and adherence were varied in sensitivity analysis to assess robustness of results. Treatment with miltefosine resulted in substantially lower cost-per-cure from a societal and patient perspective, and slightly higher cost-per-cure from a government payer perspective compared to MA. Mean societal cost-per-cure were $531 (SD±$239) for MA and $188 (SD±$100) for miltefosine, a mean cost-per-cure difference of +$343. Mean cost-per-cure from a patient perspective were $442 (SD ±$233) for MA and $30 (SD±$16) for miltefosine, a mean difference of +$412. Mean cost-per-cure from a government perspective were $89 (SD±$55) for MA and $158 (SD±$98) for miltefosine, with a mean difference of -$69. Results were robust across a variety of assumptions in univariate and multi-way analysis.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

Treatment of pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis with miltefosine via cDOT is cost saving from patient and societal perspectives, and moderately more costly from the government payer perspective compared to treatment with MA. Results were robust over a range of sensitivity analyses. Lower drug price for miltefosine could result in cost saving from a government perspective.

Pharmacokinetics of Miltefosine in Children and Adults with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

An open-label pharmacokinetics (PK) clinical trial was conducted to comparatively assess the PK and explore the pharmacodynamics (PD) of miltefosine in children and adults with cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Colombia. Sixty patients, 30 children aged 2 to 12 years and 30 adults aged 18 to 60 years, were enrolled. Participants received miltefosine (Impavido) at a nominal dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day for 28 days. Miltefosine concentrations were measured in plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry of samples obtained during treatment and up to 6 months following completion of treatment, when therapeutic outcome was determined. Fifty-two patients were cured, 5 pediatric patients failed treatment, and 3 participants were lost to follow-up. Leishmania (Viannia) panamensis predominated among the strains isolated (42/46; 91%). Noncompartmental analysis demonstrated that plasma and intracellular miltefosine concentrations were, overall, lower in children than in adults. Exposure to miltefosine, estimated by area under the concentration-time curve and maximum concentration, was significantly lower in children in both the central and intracellular compartments (P < 0.01). Leishmania persistence was detected in 43% of study participants at the end of treatment and in 27% at 90 days after initiation of treatment. Clinical response was not dependent on parasite elimination. In vitro miltefosine susceptibility was similar for Leishmania strains from adults and children. Our results document PK differences for miltefosine in children and adults with cutaneous leishmaniasis that affect drug exposure and could influence the outcome of treatment, and they provide bases for optimizing therapeutic regimens for CL in pediatric populations. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01462500.)

Diagnosis and Treatment of Leishmaniasis: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH)

It is important to realize that leishmaniasis guidelines cannot always account for individual variation among patients. They are not intended to supplant physician judgment with respect to particular patients or special clinical situations. The IDSA and ASTMH consider adherence to these guidelines to be voluntary, with the ultimate determinations regarding their application to be made by the physician in the light of each patient's individual circumstances.

A Luciferase-Expressing Leishmania braziliensis Line That Leads to Sustained Skin Lesions in BALB/c Mice and Allows Monitoring of Miltefosine Treatment Outcome

Background

Leishmania braziliensis is the most prevalent species isolated from patients displaying cutaneous and muco-cutaneous leishmaniasis in South America. However, there are difficulties for studying L. braziliensis pathogenesis or response to chemotherapy in vivo due to the natural resistance of most mouse strains to infection with these parasites. The aim of this work was to develop an experimental set up that could be used to assess drug efficacy against L. braziliensis. The model was tested using miltefosine.

Methodology/Principal Findings

A L. braziliensis line, originally isolated from a cutaneous leishmaniasis patient, was passaged repeatedly in laboratory rodents and further genetically manipulated to express luciferase. Once collected from a culture of parasites freshly transformed from amastigotes, 10⁶ wild type or luciferase-expressing stationary phase promastigotes were inoculated subcutaneously in young BALB/c mice or golden hamsters. In both groups, sustained cutaneous lesions developed at the site of inoculation, no spontaneous self- healing being observed 4 months post-inoculation, if left untreated. Compared to the wild type line features, no difference was noted for the luciferase-transgenic line. Infected animals were treated with 5 or 15 mg/kg/day miltefosine orally for 15 days. At the end of treatment, lesions had regressed and parasites were not detected. However, relapses were observed in animals treated with both doses of miltefosine.

Conclusions/Significance

Here we described experimental settings for a late-healing model of cutaneous leishmaniasis upon inoculation of a luciferase-expressing L. braziliensis line that can be applied to drug development projects. These settings allowed the monitoring of the transient efficacy of a short-term miltefosine administration.

Leishmania braziliensis is the most prevalent species isolated from patients displaying either cutaneous or mucocutaneous leishmaniasis in South America. In this study, we developed a transgenic luciferase-expressing L. braziliensis line. These parasites were passaged in hamsters and mice and then transformed back into promastigotes. Once inoculated subcutaneously in the footpad of young laboratory animals—BALB/c mice or golden hamsters, rapid and sustained footpad thickness increase developed. This experimental model was used to monitor the parasite load fluctuations and the response to miltefosine treatment. Mice were treated orally over a two-week period, starting at week 4 post-inoculation. Though such a regimen was shown to display efficacy, the effect was not sustained and both parasite re-expansion and delayed footpad thickness increase were noticed.

Functional Validation of ABCA3 as a Miltefosine Transporter in Human Macrophages: IMPACT ON INTRACELLULAR SURVIVAL OF LEISHMANIA (VIANNIA) PANAMENSIS

Within its mammalian host, Leishmania resides and replicates as an intracellular parasite. The direct activity of antileishmanials must therefore depend on intracellular drug transport, metabolism, and accumulation within the host cell. In this study, we explored the role of human macrophage transporters in the intracellular accumulation and antileishmanial activity of miltefosine (MLF), the only oral drug available for the treatment of visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). Membrane transporter gene expression in primary human macrophages infected in vitro with Leishmania Viannia panamensis and exposed to MLF showed modulation of ABC and solute liquid carrier transporters gene transcripts. Among these, ABCA3, a lipid transporter, was significantly induced after exposure to MLF, and this induction was confirmed in primary macrophages from CL patients. Functional validation of MLF as a substrate for ABCA3 was performed by shRNA gene knockdown (KD) in THP-1 monocytes. Intracellular accumulation of radiolabeled MLF was significantly higher in ABCA3(KD) macrophages. ABCA3(KD) resulted in increased cytotoxicity induced by MLF exposure. ABCA3 gene expression inversely correlated with intracellular MLF content in primary macrophages from CL patients. ABCA3(KD) reduced parasite survival during macrophage infection with an L. V. panamensis strain exhibiting low in vitro susceptibility to MLF. Confocal microscopy showed ABCA3 to be located in the cell membrane of resting macrophages and in intracellular compartments in L. V. panamensis-infected cells. These results provide evidence of ABCA3 as an MLF efflux transporter in human macrophages and support its role in the direct antileishmanial effect of this alkylphosphocholine drug.

Systemic Meglumine Antimoniate in Cutaneous Leishmaniasis of Children: Clinical and Laboratory Complications

Children account for 7%-20% of cutaneous leishmaniasis cases in Iran, but there are few safety data to guide pediatric antiparasitic therapy. We evaluated the clinical and laboratory tolerance of the systemic pentavalent antimonial compound meglumine antimoniate, in 70 Iranian children with cutaneous leishmaniasis. Adverse effects were similar to those seen in adults.

Novel arylalkylamine compounds exhibits potent selective antiparasitic activity against Leishmania major

Leishmania major (L. major) is a protozoan parasite causal agent of Leishmaniasis. It is estimated that 12 million people are currently infected and around 2 million infections occur each year. Current treatments suffer of high toxicity for the patient, low efficacy toward the parasite, high cost, and are losing effectiveness due to parasite resistance. Discovering novel small molecule with high specificity/selectivity and drug-like properties for anti-leishmanial activity remains a significant challenge. The purpose of this study is to communicate the design and synthesis strategies of novel chemical compounds based of the arylalkylamine scaffold with selective toxicity towards L. major and less toxicity to human cells in vitro. Here, we have developed a structure activity relationship (SAR) study of arylalkylamine AA1 in order to study their anti-parasitic effect in L. major. Overall, 27 arylalkylamine compounds derived from AA1 were synthesized and purified by silica gel column chromatography. The purity of each analog was confirmed by spectroscopic methods ((1)H, (13)C NMR and LC/MS). Among these analogs, the compound AA9 showed the best toxic activity on L. major (LD50=3.34 μM), which represents a 9 fold higher lethality as compared with its parental AA1 (Fer-1) compound (LD50=28.75 μM). In addition, AA9 showed no significant toxicity at 80 μM on U20S Human Osteoblasts, Raw 264.7 Macrophages or intraperitoneal macrophages. In summary, our combined SAR study and biological evaluation data of AA1-AA27 compounds allow the identification of novel arylalkylamine compound AA9 that exhibits potent cytotoxicity against L. major promastigote with minimum toxic effect on human cells.

Therapeutic options and vaccine development in the treatment of leishmaniasis

Early treatment of leishmaniasis is critical to achieve cure, prevent psychological and social distress, and prevent transmission of disease. Untreated Leishmaniasis-cutaneous leishmaniasis, mucocutaneous leishmaniasis and visceral leishmaniasis - results in disfiguring scars and high rates of morbidity and mortality in highly endemic regions of the world. However, cure rates with available therapeutics are limited due to cost, therapeutic toxicity and the growing rate of resistance. New therapeutic targets for medications and vaccine development are under investigation to provide improved healing and efficacy for the treatment of Leishmania spp.

Cutaneous leishmaniasis in travellers: a focus on epidemiology and treatment in 2015

Imported cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a growing problem with increasing global travel to endemic areas. Returned travellers seeking care encounter significant barriers to treatment, including diagnostic delays and difficult access to anti-leishmanial drugs. Treatment recommendations in non-endemic settings are a moving target, reflecting recent developments in Leishmania diagnostics and therapeutics. Accumulating experience with molecular-based species identification has enabled species-directed therapy. Clinicians are reevaluating more toxic traditional regimens in light of newly approved therapeutic agents and emerging data on local cutaneous treatments. Referral centers are implementing treatment decision algorithms designed to maximize efficacy while minimizing adverse events. Although management strategies continue to evolve, treatment of CL in non-endemic settings remains controversial. Persistent reliance on expert opinion reflects lack of research focused on travellers and limited randomized controlled trial evidence. We herein review the current epidemiology of cutaneous leishmaniasis in travellers and species-specific evidence for available therapies.