Pneumococcal macrolide resistance--myth or reality?

Activity of novel lactone ketolide nafithromycin against multicentric invasive and non-invasive pneumococcal isolates collected in India

Background

India is among the nations reporting substantial healthcare burden linked to pneumococcal infections. Nafithromycin is a novel lactone ketolide antibiotic, which recently entered Phase 3 development in India for the indication of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP).

Objectives

To assess the in vitro activity of nafithromycin against serotyped invasive and non-invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates, collected from nine medical centres across India.

Methods

A total of 534 isolates of S. pneumoniae were collected during 2015–20 and serotyped as per CDC protocol. A subset of erythromycin-non-susceptible S. pneumoniae (n = 200) was screened for the presence of erm(B) and mef(A/E) genes. A subset of MDR isolates (n = 54) were also subjected to MLST. The MICs of antibiotics were determined by the reference agar-dilution method (CLSI). Susceptibilities of the comparators were interpreted as per CLSI criteria.

Results

Fifty-nine distinct serotypes were identified among the 534 isolates. Among erythromycin-non-susceptible isolates, erm(B) and mef(A/E) genes were found in 49% and 59% strains respectively, while MLST showed clonal diversity. Azithromycin (67.6% non-susceptible) and clindamycin (31.8% non-susceptible) showed limited activity. Penicillin (for non-meningitis) or quinolone non-susceptibility was low (<11% and <6%, respectively). Nafithromycin showed potent activity with MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ of 0.015–0.03 and 0.06 mg/L, respectively, regardless of the macrolide resistance mechanisms.

Conclusions

Indian pneumococcal isolates show poor susceptibilities to macrolides, in concordance with the global trend. Nafithromycin overcomes erm as well as mef-mediated macrolide resistance mechanisms expressed individually or concurrently in S. pneumoniae. This study supports continued clinical development of nafithromycin for pneumococcal infections including CABP.

Overcoming Acquired and Native Macrolide Resistance with Bicarbonate

The growing challenge of microbial resistance emphasizes the importance of new antibiotics or reviving strategies for the use of old ones. Macrolide antibiotics are potent bacterial protein synthesis inhibitors with a formidable capacity to treat life-threatening bacterial infections; however, acquired and intrinsic resistance limits their clinical application. In the work presented here, we reveal that bicarbonate is a potent enhancer of the activity of macrolide antibiotics that overcomes both acquired and intrinsic resistance mechanisms. With a focus on azithromycin, a highly prescribed macrolide antibiotic, and using clinically relevant pathogens, we show that physiological concentrations of bicarbonate overcome drug resistance by increasing the intracellular concentration of azithromycin. We demonstrate the potential of bicarbonate as a formulation additive for topical use of azithromycin in treating a murine wound infection caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Further, using a systemic murine model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection, we demonstrate the potential role of physiological bicarbonate, naturally abundant in the host, to enhance the activity of azithromycin against macrolide-resistant MRSA. In all, our findings suggest that macrolide resistance, observed in the clinical microbiology laboratory using standard culturing techniques, is a poor predictor of efficacy in the clinic and that observed resistance should not necessarily hamper the use of macrolides. Whether as a formulation additive for topical use or as a natural component of host tissues, bicarbonate is a powerful potentiator of macrolides with the capacity to overcome drug resistance in life-threatening bacterial infections.

Anti Pneumococcal Activity of Azithromycin-Eudragit RS100 Nano-Formulations

Purpose: Bacterial pneumonia is a common lung infection caused by different types of bacteria. Azithromycin (AZI), an azalide antibiotic, is widely used to manage pneumococcal infections. Studies have shown that antibiotics in nanocarriers may lead to increased antibacterial activity and reduced toxicity. The aim of this work was to valuate in vitro antibacterial performance azithromycin-Eudragit RS100 nano-formulations against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus. Methods: AZI-Eudragit RS100 nanoparticles were prepared via electrospinning technique and the in vitro antibacterial performance against S. pneumoniae and S. aureus were assessed using agar dilution method. Results: Nanofibers in the sizes about 100-300 nm in diameter and micro scale in length and nanobeads in the range of 100-500 nm were achieved. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) showed an enhancement in the antimicrobial effect of AZI-Eudragit RS100 nanofibers (40 µg/ml) compare to untreated AZI solution (>160 µg/ml) against S. pneumonia. The MIC value for AZI-Eudragit RS100 nanofibers against S. aureus was >128 µg/ml, same as that of the untreated AZI solution. Conclusion: The enhanced efficiency of AZI in nanofibers could be related to the more adsorption opportunity of nanofibers to S. pneumonia capsulated cell wall which provides an antibiotic depot on the bacterial surface compared to S. aureus. AZI-Eudragit RS100 nanofibers with enhanced antimicrobial effect against S. pneumonia can be considered as a candidate for in vivo evaluations in antibiotic therapy of Pneumococcal infections.

Macrolide resistance in pneumococci-is it relevant?

Macrolide antibiotics are widely used for a range of indications, including pneumonia. Both high-level and low-level resistance to macrolides is increasing in pneumococci globally. Macrolide resistance in pneumococci is of limited clinical relevance where ß-lactams remain the mainstay of treatment, such as for moderate/severe pneumonia; however, data suggest that macrolides may not be able to be relied on as monotherapy for serious pneumococcal infections.

Patterns of Macrolide Resistance Determinants among S. pyogenes and S. pneumoniae Isolates in Saudi Arabia

In the study we characterized the macrolide sensitivity of recent clinical isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes and S. pneumoniae collected from major Saudi Arabian hospitals. Susceptibility testing was performed using standard National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards methodology on 335 S. pyogenes and 350 S. pneumoniae isolates. Macrolide resistance mechanism phenotypes were identified using double-disk diffusion. All S. pyogenes were penicillin sensitive, while 6.3% were macrolide resistant, the main mechanism of which was of M phenotype (96%). Approximately 51% of S. pneumoniae were penicillin non-susceptible. Macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae accounted for 18.8%, the majority of which were M phenotype (91%). Low-level resistance mediated by mef-bearing strains predominated. Newer macrolides, including azithromycin, are still considered drugs of choice for empirical treatment of respiratory infection in such circumstances.

Changing bacteriological profile and mortality trends in community acquired pneumonia

There are very few and conflicting Indian data regarding the bacteriological etiology of community acquired pneumonia (CAP). Adding to this agony, there is no credible data from the eastern part of India. This is a cross-sectional study and descriptive in nature over a period of 1-year. Of the 464 cases of the study population, we could isolate aerobic bacteria in 149 patients (32.1%). Streptococcus pneumoniae has been identified as the most common organism causing CAP (68/149). Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) as a group exceeded marginally over S. pneumoniae (69/149). Among GNB, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common organism (31/69), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (29/69). Staphylococcus aureus was identified in (12/149) cases. Co-amoxyclav is still the most sensitive drug for S. pneumoniae. P. aeruginosa was most sensitive to imipenam followed by piperacillin-tazobactam.

A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric method for the quantification of azithromycin in human plasma

A liquid chromatographic mass spectrometric assay for the quantification of azithromycin in human plasma was developed. Azithromycin and imipramine (as internal standard, IS) were extracted from 0.5 mL human plasma using extraction with diethyl ether under alkaline conditions. Chromatographic separation of drug and IS was performed using a C18 column at room temperature. A mobile phase consisting of methanol, water, ammonium hydroxide and ammonium acetate was pumped at 0.2 mL/min. The mass spectrometer was operated in positive ion mode and selected ion recording acquisition mode. The ions utilized for quantification of azithromycin and IS were m/z 749.6 (M + H)(+) and m/z 591.4 (fragment) for azithromycin, and 281.1 m/z for internal standard; retention times were 6.9 and 3.4 min, respectively. The calibration curves were linear (r(2) > 0.999) in the concentration ranges of 10-1000 ng/mL. The mean absolute recoveries for 50 and 500 ng/mL azithromycin and 1 µg/ mL IS were >75%. The percentage coefficient of variation and mean error were <11%. Based on validation data, the lower limit of quantification was 10 ng/mL. The present method was successfully applied to determine azithromycin pharmacokinetic parameters in two obese volunteers. The assay had applicability for use in pharmacokinetic studies.

Intrapulmonary Pharmacokinetics of Antibacterial Agents

The idea of studying the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibacterials in order to predict their efficacy has long been of interest. Traditionally, serum drug concentrations have been evaluated against the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of a given pathogen; however, infection site-specific data continue to gain interest from clinicians. Despite methodological limitations, progress in techniques has improved the clinical significance of data generated. Rather than using tissue homogenates which fail to differentiate between interstitial and intracellular concentrations, newer collection techniques focus on sampling of matrices that allow for this differentiation. These collection techniques now allow one to accurately describe beta-lactam and aminoglycoside interstitial penetrations, as well as, the interstitial and phagocytic concentrations of macrolides and fluoroquinolones. By using these specific data and the MICs of infecting pathogens, it is hoped that conclusions can be drawn by a clinician as to the appropriateness of the choice of an antibacterial.

Clarithromycin Extended-Release Tablet

Clarithromycin is an orally active, advanced-generation macrolide that has been reformulated as an extended-release tablet (Biaxin) XL Filmtab allowing convenient once-daily administration. The reformulation is intended to improve patient compliance and the tolerability of the drug. Although maximum plasma clarithromycin concentrations are lower and reached later with the extended-release tablets than with the immediate-release tablets, the two formulations are bioequivalent with respect to the area under the plasma concentration-time curve. Bioequivalence is also achieved between the formulations for the microbiologically active metabolite, 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin. Two randomized trials in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) showed that a 7-day course of clarithromycin extended-release 1000 mg once daily produced clinical cure rates of 83% and 85% and bacteriologic cure rates of 86% and 92% at the test-of-cure study visit. Similar rates of cure were achieved with a 7-day course of twice-daily clarithromycin immediate-release and with a 10-day course of twice-daily amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.A 7-day course of clarithromycin extended-release 1000 mg once daily produced clinical and bacteriologic cure rates of 88% and 86%, respectively, in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Similar cure rates were achieved in recipients of once-daily levofloxacin in the same trial. In patients with acute maxillary sinusitis, a 14-day course of either once-daily clarithromycin extended-release or twice-daily clarithromycin immediate-release produced statistically equivalent clinical cure rates of 85% and 79%, respectively. Both treatment groups achieved similar rates of radiographic success and resolution of sinusitis. Recent results indicate that clarithromycin extended-release 500 mg once daily for 5 days is also effective in the treatment of patients with streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis and in the treatment of AECB. The most frequently reported drug-related events with clarithromycin extended-release were abnormal taste (7% incidence), diarrhea (6%) and nausea (3%). Most adverse drug reactions were of a mild and transient nature. In comparative clinical trials, clarithromycin extended-release had an improved gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared with the immediate-release formulation. In addition, clarithromycin extended-release was better tolerated than amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and as well tolerated as levofloxacin. Further studies are required to assess the cost-effectiveness ratio of clarithromycin relative to comparator antibacterial agents.

CONCLUSION

Clarithromycin extended-release is an effective treatment for AECB, CAP, acute maxillary sinusitis, and pharyngitis (although not approved for the latter in the US), and is administered in a convenient dosage regimen that has the potential to encourage good compliance. The reformulation modulates clarithromycin absorption kinetics thereby improving tolerability. Therefore, clarithromycin extended-release provides a useful option for the treatment of specific respiratory tract infections.

Bacteriological and clinical profile of Community acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients

The aim of our study was to obtain comprehensive insight into the bacteriological and clinical profile of community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization. The patient population consisted of 100 patients admitted with the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), as defined by British Thoracic society, from December 1998 to Dec 2000, at the Sher- i-Kashmir institute of Medical Sciences Soura, Srinagar, India. Gram negative organisms were the commonest cause (19/29), followed by gram positive (10/29). In 71 cases no etiological cause was obtained. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the commonest pathogen (10/29), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (7/29), Escherichia coli (6/29), Klebsiella spp. (3/29), Streptococcus pyogenes (1/29), Streptococcus pneumoniae (1/29) and Acinetobacter spp. (1/29). Sputum was the most common etiological source of organism isolation (26) followed by blood (6), pleural fluid (3), and pus culture (1). Maximum number of patients presented with cough (99%), fever (95%), tachycardia (92%), pleuritic chest pain (75%), sputum production (65%) and leucocytosis (43%). The commonest predisposing factors were smoking (65%), COPD (57%), structural lung disease (21%), diabetes mellitus (13%), and decreased level of consciousness following seizure (eight per cent) and chronic alcoholism (one per cent). Fourteen patients, of whom, nine were males and five females, died. Staphylococcus aureus was the causative organism in four, Pseudomonas in two, Klebsiella in one, and no organism was isolated in seven cases. The factors predicting mortality at admission were - age over 62 years, history of COPD or smoking, hypotension, altered sensorium, respiratory failure, leucocytosis, and staphylococcus pneumonia and undetermined etiology. The overall rate of identification of microbial etiology of community-acquired pneumonia was 29%, which is very low, and if serological tests for legionella, mycoplasma and viruses are performed the diagnostic yield would definitely be better. This emphasizes the need for further studies (including the serological tests for Legionella, mycoplasma and viruses) to identify the microbial etiology of CAP.

Synergistic effect of erythromycin on polymorphonuclear cell antibacterial activity against erythromycin-resistant phenotypes of Streptococcus pyogenes

To evaluate the synergistic activity of erythromycin and human polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) on the binomial erythromycin-resistant (ERY(R)) Streptococcus pyogenes/host, the phagocytic and bactericidal activities of PMNs against ERY(R) streptococcal strains (cMLS(B), M, and iMLS(B) A, B and C phenotypes) were assessed in the presence of the macrolide. The results showed that when erythromycin, PMNs and streptococci [both erythromycin-sensitive (ERY(S)) and ERY(R)] were simultaneously present in the culture medium, PMN phagocytic activity was similar to that of drug-free controls. In contrast, the results emphasised a significant high increase in intracellular killing by PMNs in the presence of erythromycin not only for ERY(S) streptococci but also for ERY(R)S. pyogenes with high (cMLS(B), iMLS(B) A and iMLS(B) B phenotypes) and moderate (M and iMLS(B) C phenotypes) erythromycin resistance compared with controls without drug. From literature data it emerged that, even if intracellularly concentrated, erythromycin is relatively inactive because of its instability. The results indicate that the enhanced intra-PMN streptococcal killing detected is mainly attributable to PMN bactericidal systems that synergise with intracellular erythromycin in eradicating ERY(R)S. pyogenes strains (both with high and moderate resistance). These data confirm that the antibiotic resistance detected in vitro does not always imply a failure of antimicrobial treatment.

Levofloxacin versus azithromycin on the oropharyngeal carriage and selection of antibacterial- resistant streptococci in the microflora of healthy adults

OBJECTIVE

To determine the proportion of subjects with oropharyngeal streptococci resistant to either levofloxacin or azithromycin prior to and during antibacterial exposure, and to follow temporal changes in the proportion of resistant and susceptible isolates through 6 weeks post-exposure. This randomized, open-label, single-center study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT00821782).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 143 healthy volunteers (levofloxacin, n = 71; azithromycin, n = 72) without antibacterial exposure in the previous 90 days received either levofloxacin 750 mg once daily for 5 days or azithromycin 500 mg once daily on day 1 and 250 mg once daily on days 2 through 5. Oropharyngeal cultures were obtained pre-exposure, at day 5, and at 2, 4, and 6 weeks post-dosing. Bacterial strains were identified and the minimum inhibitory concentrations for levofloxacin and azithromycin were determined.

RESULTS

At study entry 117 streptococci were isolated from 72 subjects randomized to azithromycin and 53 (45.3%) were azithromycin-resistant. None of the 121 streptococci isolated from 71 subjects randomized to.levofloxacin were colonized by a levofloxacin-resistant microorganism prior to dosing. At the end of dosing, the number of subjects with resistant streptococci (S. mitis, S. salivarius, S. sanguis, or alpha streptococcus species [spp.]) increased in azithromycin-exposed subjects and resistant isolates remained through 6 weeks post-dosing. In contrast, a small number of levofloxacin-resistant streptococci were observed at the end of dosing but decreased by week 2 post-dosing and continued to decrease through the 6-week evaluation period (p < 0.001 azithromycin vs. levofloxacin for S. mitis, S. salivarius, S. sanguis and alpha streptococcus spp. at week 6). Limitations of this study included the fact that, since previous antibiotic use was self-reported, genetic typing was not done. The results of this study may not be completely generalizable, because subjects in this study received study drug under directly-observed conditions, thus ensuring compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

Both antibacterial agents were well tolerated. Levofloxacin 750 mg administered for 5 days was associated with less microbial resistance than that observed with azithromycin in healthy subjects.

Management of community-acquired pneumonia in children

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a significant cause of childhood morbidity and mortality worldwide. Viral etiology is most common in young children and decreases with age. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the single most common bacterial cause across all age groups. Atypical organisms present similarly across all age groups and may be more common than previously recognized.A bacterial pneumonia should be considered in children presenting with fever >38.5 degrees C, tachypnea, and chest recession. Oxygen therapy is life saving and should be given when oxygen saturation is <92%. For non-severe pneumonia, oral amoxicillin is the antibacterial of choice with low failure rates reported. Severely ill children are traditionally treated with parenteral antibacterials. Penicillin non-susceptible S. pneumoniae prevalence rates are increasing and have been linked to community antibacterial prescribing. Most pneumococci remain sensitive to high-dose penicillin-based antibacterials but macrolide resistance is also a problem in some communities. However, primary combination treatment with macrolides is indicated in areas where there is a high prevalence of atypical organisms. The most common complications in CAP are parapneumonic effusions and empyema. The use of ultrasonography combined with intercostal drainage augmented with the use of fibrinolytic therapy has significantly reduced the morbidity associated with these complications. There is increasing evidence that a preventative strategy with the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-7) results in a significant fall in CAP in early childhood.

Single-dose azithromycin microsphere formulation: a novel delivery system for antibiotics

Azithromycin extended release (Zmax, Pfizer Inc) is a novel single-dose administration formulation of azithromycin which won FDA approval in June 2005 and is currently approved for the treatment of community acquired pneumonia and acute bacterial sinusitis. Azitromycin is incorporated into sustained-release microspheres which release the drug slowly through 200 microm pores. Because of this sustained release mechanism, most of the drug is released into the lower gastrointestinal tract, reducing gastrointestinal side-effects, and allowing for a higher dose to be administered. The unique pharmacological properties and extremely long half-life of azithromycin make this drug well suited to single-dose administration but gastrointestinal side effects have previously hampered single-dose therapy.

Managing community-acquired pneumonia: A European perspective

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common disease and a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It puts an enormous burden on medical and economic resources, particularly if hospitalization is required. Initial antibacterial therapy for CAP is usually empirical, as culture and antibacterial sensitivity test results are rarely available at initial diagnosis. Any agent selected for empirical therapy should have good activity against the pathogens commonly associated with CAP, a favorable tolerability profile, and be administered in a simple dosage regimen for good compliance. Streptococcus pneumoniae remains the most common causative pathogen, although the incidence of this organism varies widely. Streptococcus pneumoniae strains with decreased susceptibility to penicillin have become increasingly prevalent over the past 30 years and are now a serious problem worldwide. In addition, an increase in the prevalence of pneumococci resistant to macrolides has been observed in Europe over recent years. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae are among the most common atypical pathogens isolated from patients with CAP. Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus and Moraxella catarrhalis are less commonly identified as causative organisms. The emergence and spread of resistance to commonly used antibiotics has challenged the management of CAP. Multiple sets of CAP guidelines have been published to address the continued changes in this complex disease.

Antibacterial natural products in medicinal chemistry--exodus or revival?

To create a drug, nature's blueprints often have to be improved through semisynthesis or total synthesis (chemical postevolution). Selected contributions from industrial and academic groups highlight the arduous but rewarding path from natural products to drugs. Principle modification types for natural products are discussed herein, such as decoration, substitution, and degradation. The biological, chemical, and socioeconomic environments of antibacterial research are dealt with in context. Natural products, many from soil organisms, have provided the majority of lead structures for marketed anti-infectives. Surprisingly, numerous "old" classes of antibacterial natural products have never been intensively explored by medicinal chemists. Nevertheless, research on antibacterial natural products is flagging. Apparently, the "old fashioned" natural products no longer fit into modern drug discovery. The handling of natural products is cumbersome, requiring nonstandardized workflows and extended timelines. Revisiting natural products with modern chemistry and target-finding tools from biology (reversed genomics) is one option for their revival.

Synthesis and antibacterial activity of 3-keto-6-O-carbamoyl-11,12-cyclic thiocarbamate erythromycin A derivatives

A series of 3-keto-6-O-carbamoyl-11,12-cyclic thiocarbamate erythromycin A derivatives has been synthesized. The best compounds in this series possess potent in vitro antibacterial activity against erythromycin-susceptible and erythromycin-resistant bacteria.

Efficacy and safety of 3-day azithromycin versus 5-day moxifloxacin for the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

Antibiotic therapy is of clinical benefit in certain patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). In this randomised, investigator-blinded, multicentre trial, azithromycin (500mg once a day (qd) for 3 days) was compared with moxifloxacin (400mg qd for 5 days) for the treatment of outpatients with AECB (forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) >35%). Of 342 patients randomised to either treatment, 169 received azithromycin and 173 received moxifloxacin. The mean age in the azithromycin and moxifloxacin groups was 56.4 years and 55.5 years, respectively. In the intent-to-treat analysis, clinical success rates for azithromycin and moxifloxacin were comparable at Days 10-12 (90% versus 90%, respectively) and Days 22-26 (81% versus 82%, respectively). Among patients who were culture-positive at baseline for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis or Haemophilus parainfluenzae, clinical efficacy for azithromycin versus moxifloxacin at Days 10-12 was 93% versus 84%, respectively, and at Days 22-26 it was 89% versus 73%, respectively. The incidence of at least one treatment-related adverse event (AE) in the azithromycin and moxifloxacin groups was 18.3% and 19.1%, respectively. The most common AEs were diarrhoea, nausea, abdominal pain and vaginitis. Most treatment-related AEs were of mild or moderate severity, with no serious treatment-related AEs. One subject in the moxifloxacin group discontinued treatment owing to a treatment-related AE (precordial pain and dry throat). Compliance with both regimens was >90%. Three-day azithromycin and 5-day moxifloxacin demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety for the treatment of AECB in outpatients.

The use of erythromycin as a gastrointestinal prokinetic agent in adult critical care: benefits versus risks

Erythromycin A, the first macrolide, was introduced in the 1950s and after years of clinical experience it still remains a commonly relied upon antibiotic. In the past, pharmacodynamic characteristics of macrolides beyond antimicrobial action such as anti-inflammatory and immune-modulating properties have been of scientific and clinical interest. The function of erythromycin as a prokinetic agent has also been investigated for a range of gastrointestinal motility disorders and more recently within the context of critically ill patients. Prokinetic agents are drugs that increase contractile force and accelerate intraluminal transit. Whilst the anti-inflammatory action may be a desirable side effect to its antibiotic action, using erythromycin A merely for its prokinetic effect alone raises the concern about promoting emergence of macrolide resistance. The objectives of this review article are: (i) to briefly summarize the modes and epidemiology of macrolide resistance, particularly in respect to that found in the Streptococcus species (a potential reservoir for the dissemination of macrolide resistance on the critical care unit); (ii) to discuss in this context the evidence for conditions promoting bacterial resistance against macrolides; and (iii) to assess the potential clinical benefit of using erythromycin A as a prokinetic versus the risks of promoting emergence of macrolide resistance in the clinical setting. We conclude, that in view of the growing weight of evidence demonstrating the potential epidemiological impact of the increased use of macrolides upon the spread of resistance, versus a lack of sufficient and convincing evidence that erythromycin A is a superior prokinetic agent to potential alternatives in the critically ill patient population, at this stage we do not advocate the use of erythromycin A as a prokinetic agent in critically ill patients unless they have failed all other treatment for impaired gastrointestinal dysmotility and are intolerant of metoclopramide. Further large and methodologically robust studies are needed to ascertain the effectiveness of erythromycin A and other alternative agents in the critically ill.

Controversies in the treatment of pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia remains an important cause of disease and death both in the developed and the developing worlds, despite the ready availability of potent antimicrobial agents to which the organisms remain susceptible. Furthermore, disease management is complicated by emerging resistance of the common pathogens to the various classes of commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents. Much recent research in the field of community-acquired pneumonia has focused attention on optimal treatment, evaluating the impact of antibiotic resistance, as well as of antimicrobial choices, on the outcome of these infections. In addition, efforts have been directed towards finding adjunctive therapies to antibiotics that may improve the prognosis of these patients. This article reviews some of these research areas, highlighting controversies that still exist with regard to final recommendations, and in particular with regard to infections with Streptococcus pneumoniae, the most common bacterial cause of community-acquired pneumonia.

Macrolide resistance in bacteremic pneumococcal disease: implications for patient management

BACKGROUND

Despite pneumococcal antibiotic resistance rates in excess of 25%, macrolides remain first-line agents for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

METHODS

Prospective, population-based surveillance was conducted to identify cases of pneumococcal bacteremia in Toronto and Peel, Canada, between 2000 and 2004. "Macrolide failures" were defined as cases of bacteremia occurring during outpatient treatment with macrolide antibiotics or within 2 days after treatment. Macrolide susceptibility was determined according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines; common macrolide resistance mechanisms were determined by genotyping.

RESULTS

During the 5 years of surveillance, there were 1696 episodes of pneumococcal bacteremia (8.5 cases/100,000 population/year), of which 60 (3.5%) were failures of outpatient macrolide therapy. Resistant isolates were more common among cases of bacteremia after failure of macrolide therapy (37 [64%] of 58 cases) than among cases of bacteremia after failure of nonmacrolide antibiotics (16 [22%] of 74 cases; P<.001) or cases of bacteremia that occurred without prior antibiotic therapy (193 [12%] of 1569 cases; P<.001). Macrolide failures were significantly more common among cases of pneumococcal bacteremia with isolates exhibiting an erythromycin MIC of 1 microg/mL than among isolates exhibiting MICs < or = 0.25 microg/mL (3 [38%] of 8 cases vs. 21 [1.5%] of 1394 cases of bacteremia; P<.001). Increases in the MIC to 1 microg/mL were not associated with further increases in the likelihood of macrolide failure. Low-level resistance conferred by mefA and high-level resistance conferred by ermB were equally overrepresented among macrolide failures.

CONCLUSIONS

Macrolide resistance contributes to an increased risk of macrolide failure, irrespective of the underlying resistance mechanism or of the degree of elevation in erythromycin MIC.

Murine models of pneumococcal pneumonia and their applicability to the study of tissue-directed antimicrobials

Animal models have long played a crucial role in the preclinical and postmarketing evaluation of antimicrobial drug efficacy. With the alarming rise of antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae, such models have received increased attention as tools for deriving pharmacodynamic data and for determining the clinical significance of drug resistance. This information helps us to make therapeutic decisions to optimize efficacy and restrict the further promotion of drug resistance. Until now, however, insufficient attention has been paid to the special issues that arise in the evaluation of antimicrobials that are concentrated in tissue relative to serum or plasma. This article reviews the utility of animal models in the evaluation of these tissue-directed antibiotics, citing recent attempts to use murine models of pneumococcal pneumonia to determine the importance of macrolide resistance. A promising new, low-dose aerosol model of pneumonia is briefly presented, as is a discussion of the limitations of existing models.

Synthesis and antibacterial activity of 3-O-acyl-6-O-carbamoyl erythromycin A derivatives

A series of 3-O-acyl-6-O-carbamoyl erythromycin A derivatives has been synthesized. Several functional groups were identified as the optimal C3-substituents, and the best compounds in this series possess potent in vitro antibacterial activity against erythromycin-susceptible and erythromycin-resistant bacteria.

Synthesis and antibacterial activity of 6-O-heteroarylcarbamoyl-11,12-lactoketolides

A new series of erythromycin A derivatives, the 6-O-heteroarylcarbamoyl-11,12-lactoketolides, with activity against macrolide-resistant streptococci, are described. Structurally, these macrolide antibiotics are characterized by a heteroaryl side chain attached to the macrolactone core through a carbamate linkage at the C6 position, as well as 11,12-gamma-lactone and 3-keto functionalities. The synthesis and antibacterial activity of this new series of ketolides are discussed.

Optimal pharmacological therapy for community-acquired pneumonia: the role of dual antibacterial therapy

The optimal pharmacological therapy of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the most ardently debated issues in medicine. Presently, most guidelines recommend either a fluoroquinolone alone or dual therapy with a third-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide in patients hospitalised with CAP, but few provide clinicians with specific considerations for selecting from these agents. Despite a similar spectrum of activity and favourable resistance patterns (for fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins) against CAP pathogens, there is emerging evidence that dual therapy may be superior to monotherapy in certain populations.In patients with non-severe CAP, the evidence supports the use of either monotherapy or dual therapy in most patients; however, patients with severe CAP or bacteraemic pneumococcal CAP experience improved survival when treated with dual therapy. It is unclear from this evidence if any specific combination of agents is the most effective, but the combination of a third-generation cephalosporin plus a macrolide is the most extensively studied. Dual therapy was superior to monotherapy irrespective of the susceptibility of the aetiological pathogen, thus insufficient antimicrobial spectrum does not explain the disparity. The most likely explanation for improved outcomes with dual therapy is the combined effect of optimised antimicrobial spectrum (including atypicals), decreased impact of resistance to a single agent and the immunomodulatory effects of macrolides. Increasing resistance in patients with non-severe CAP warrants the consideration of dual therapy and perhaps a reappraisal of agents usually reserved for second-line therapy, including doxycycline, in these populations as well. In light of the available evidence, dual therapy should be strongly considered in all patients with severe CAP, especially when complicated by pneumococcal bacteraemia.

The Controversy of Combination vs Monotherapy in the Treatment of Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia

BACKGROUND

The majority of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients (about 80%) will be treated as outpatients, because therapy with a single agent will work. For the remaining 20% of patients requiring hospitalization, there is some growing debate regarding the efficacy of different management approaches. For hospitalized patients, monotherapy with a respiratory fluoroquinolone agent seems to be gaining popularity, but dual therapy combining a beta-lactam and an advanced macrolide still represents a good choice. Indeed, this regimen was recommended for all of the inpatient categories in the latest Infectious Disease Society of America CAP guidelines in 2003.

AIM

The purpose of this review was to examine the current clinical evidence to support one option or the other by gathering all of the available published literature. We will review the existing controversies in terms of microbiology, immunology, and clinical outcomes comparing dual therapy (ie, with any combination of beta-lactams, macrolides, or fluoroquinolones) with monotherapy in the treatment of CAP.

RESULTS

For the vast majority of patients with CAP (ie, outpatients and inpatients on medical wards), the type of antibiotic regimen prescribed does not have any significant impact. For patients with severe pneumonia, for which there is no accepted definition so far, the controversy remains alive. Mortality from pneumococcal pneumonia has been reduced over the last decades, but despite improved medical care, bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia is still as lethal as ever, probably because of the aging population, the greater number of immunocompromised patients, and the number of patients with frequent comorbid conditions. Worldwide, the increasing rates of resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to antibiotics are also a serious concern, and the clinical implications are not always obvious. Although limited in number, the four studies showing the importance of adding a macrolide to a beta-lactam regimen for the treatment of bacteremic S pneumoniae pneumonia are retrospective and nonblinded, the findings are consistent, and they point to a trend that has to be explored more thoroughly. Studies published in the last few years suggest that combination therapy may be superior for bacteremic S pneumoniae pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

In the meantime, for practical purposes, patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of severe CAP may benefit from a dual antibiotic therapy combining a third-generation cephalosporin and a macrolide. For the majority of hospitalized patients with CAP who are not severely ill, fluoroquinolone monotherapy remains an approved, tested, and reliable option. Indeed, the time for more aggressive outpatient fluoroquinolone therapy may reduce the number of patients who are hospitalized with CAP. Independent prospective studies comparing combination therapy with standard monotherapy are urgently required for hospitalized patients with severe CAP.

Guide to selection of fluoroquinolones in patients with lower respiratory tract infections

Newer fluoroquinolones such as levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and gemifloxacin have several attributes that make them excellent choices for the therapy of lower respiratory tract infections. In particular, they have excellent intrinsic activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and the atypical respiratory pathogens. Fluoroquinolones may be used as monotherapy to treat high-risk patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, and for patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalisation, but not admission to intensive care. Overall, the newer fluoroquinolones often achieve clinical cure rates in > or =90% of these patients. However, rates may be lower in hospital-acquired pneumonia, and this infection should be treated on the basis of anticipated organisms and evaluation of risk factors for specific pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this setting, an antipseudomonal fluoroquinolone may be used in combination with an antipseudomonalbeta-lactam. Concerns are now being raised about the widespread use, and possibly misuse, of fluoroquinolones and the emergence of resistance among S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa. A number of pharmacokinetic parameters such as the peak concentration of the antibacterial after a dose (C(max)), and the 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) and their relationship to pharmacodynamic parameters such as the minimum inhibitory and the mutant prevention concentrations (MIC and MPC, respectively) have been proposed to predict the effect of fluoroquinolones on bacterial killing and the emergence of resistance. Higher C(max)/MIC or AUC24/MIC and C(max)/MPC or AUC24/MPC ratios, either as a result of dose administration or the susceptibility of the organism, may lead to a better clinical outcome and decrease the emergence of resistance, respectively. Pharmacokinetic profiles that are optimised to target low-level resistant minor subpopulations of bacteria that often exist in infections may help preserve fluoroquinolones as a class. To this end, optimising the AUC24/MPC or C(max)/MPC ratios is important, particularly against S. pneumoniae, in the setting of lower respiratory tract infections. Agents such as moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin with high ratios against this organism are preferred, and agents such as ciprofloxacin with low ratios should be avoided. For agents such as levofloxacin and gatifloxacin, with intermediate ratios against S. pneumoniae, it may be worthwhile considering alternative dose administration strategies, such as using higher dosages, to eradicate low-level resistant variants. This must, of course, be balanced against the potential of toxicity. Innovative approaches to the use of fluoroquinolones are worth testing in further in vitro experiments as well as in clinical trials.

Treatment of acute exacerbation of severe-to-very severe COPD with azithromycin in patients vaccinated against Streptococcus pneumoniae

Sixty-five consecutive eligible adult patients, who were treated as outpatients for stable severe-to-very severe COPD, were enrolled in the study. All of them received 23-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine intramuscularly. Patients were seen monthly, as well as whenever they had symptoms suggestive of an exacerbation, at our outpatient clinic. Eighteen out of 65 patients suffered from acute exacerbation (AECOPD). Three of these patients presented two episodes of AECOPD. Patients with an acute exacerbation of COPD received azithromycin 500 mg/day once daily for 3 days and a short course of oral prednisolone 25 mg/die. In 16 cases, a single species was isolated, while in the remaining 5 cases at least two species were recovered. Clinical cure or improvement at the end of therapy (3-5 days post-therapy) was reported in 17 episodes of AECOPD with no relapse at the late post-therapy (10-14 days after the completion of treatment). Bacteriologic eradication or presumptive eradication rates at the end of therapy were 86% (24 out of 28 isolates). Azithromycin eradicated all isolates of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, H. parainfluenzae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Klebsiella spp. isolated at baseline. Eradication of Sta aureus occurred in 1 of 3 isolates whereas azithromycin was unable to eradicate Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Our data seem to indicate that pneumococcal vaccination reduces the possibility that an AECOPD is caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. This finding allows the use of antibiotics such as azithromycin, which, otherwise, should be avoided because of resistances.

Addition of macrolide in treating adult hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia

OBJECTIVES

Current clinical practice guidelines, including those in south Asia, recommend the addition of a macrolide to a broad-spectrum antibiotic for the treatment of severe hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The aim of this study was to observe the influence of macrolide addition on clinical outcomes of hospitalized adult patients with CAP.

METHODOLOGY

Over a 16-month period between 2002 and 2004, 141 eligible patients were prospectively recruited from an urban-based teaching hospital in Malaysia.

RESULTS

Of the 141 patients, 63 (44.7%) patients (age (standard deviation (SD)) 56 (20.0) years; 50.8% male) received a macrolide-containing antibiotic regimen, while 78 (55.3%; age (SD) 57 (20.2) years; 52.6% male) were on a single broad-spectrum antibiotic only. In total, 39 (27.7%) and 102 (72.3%) patients had severe and 'non-severe' pneumonia, respectively. Irrespective of whether they had severe or non-severe pneumonia, there were no significant differences in mortality (non-severe pneumonia, 6.5% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.804; severe pneumonia, 17.6% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.966), need of ventilation (non-severe pneumonia, 8.7% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.274; severe pneumonia, 23.5% vs. 13.6%, P = 0.425) or median length of hospital stay (non-severe pneumonia, 5.5 vs. 5 days, P = 0.954; severe pneumonia, 7 vs. 6 days, P = 0.401) between the two treatment regimens.

CONCLUSION

This observational, non-randomized study suggests that addition of a macrolide may not convey any extra clinical benefits in adult hospitalized patients with CAP.

Drug treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia in the elderly

Streptococcus pneumoniae has been recognised as a major cause of pneumonia since the time of Sir William Osler. Drug-resistant S. pneumoniae (DRSP), which have gradually become resistant to penicillins as well as more recently developed macrolides and fluoroquinolones, have emerged as a consequence of indiscriminate use of antibacterials coupled with the ability of the pneumococcus to adapt to a changing antibacterial milieu. Pneumococci use cell wall choline components to bind platelet-activating factor receptors, colonise mucosal surfaces and evade innate immune defenses. Numerous virulence factors that include hyaluronidase, neuraminidase, iron-binding proteins, pneumolysin and autolysin then facilitate cytolysis of host cells and allow tissue invasion and bloodstream dissemination. Changes in pneumococcal cell wall penicillin-binding proteins account for resistance to penicillins, mutations in the ermB gene cause high-level macrolide resistance and mutations in topoisomerase IV genes coupled with GyrA gene mutations alter DNA gyrase and lead to high-level fluoroquinolone resistance. Risk factors for lower respiratory tract infections in the elderly include age-associated changes in oral clearance, mucociliary clearance and immune function. Other risks for developing pneumonia include poor nutrition, hypoalbuminaemia, bedridden status, aspiration, recent viral infection, the presence of chronic organ dysfunction syndromes including parenchymal lung disease and recent antibacterial therapy. Although the incidence of infections caused by DRSP is rising, the effect of an increase in the prevalence of resistant pneumococci on mortality is not clear. When respiratory infections occur, rapid diagnosis and prompt, empirical administration of appropriate antibacterial therapy that ensures adequate coverage of DRSP is likely to increase the probability of a successful outcome when treating community-acquired pneumonia in elderly patients, particularly those with multiple risk factors for DRSP. A chest x-ray is recommended for all patients, but other testing such as obtaining a sputum Gram's smear is not necessary and should not prolong the time gap between clinical suspicion of pneumonia and antibacterial administration. The selection of antibacterials should be based upon local resistance patterns of suspected organisms and the bactericidal efficacy of the chosen drugs. If time-dependent agents are chosen and DRSP are possible pathogens, dosing should keep drug concentrations above the minimal inhibitory concentration that is effective for DRSP. Treatment guidelines and recent studies suggest that combination therapy with a beta-lactam and macrolide may be associated with a better outcome in hospitalised patients, and overuse of fluoroquinolones as a single agent may promote quinolone resistance. The ketolides represent a new class of macrolide-like antibacterials that are highly effective in vitro against macrolide- and azalide-resistant pneumococci. Pneumococcal vaccination with the currently available polysaccharide vaccine is thought to confer some preventive benefit (preventing invasive pneumococcal disease), but more effective vaccines, such as nonconjugate protein vaccines, need to be developed that provide broad protection against pneumococcal infection.

Antibacterial drug resistance: implications for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia

In contrast to the tremendous number of articles and meetings devoted to elucidating the mechanisms of antibacterial drug resistance and describing the emergence of drug resistance patterns, little research has been completed on the impact of bacterial drug resistance on clinical outcomes. Moreover.among the studies that have been completed, the better-designed studies generally have failed to detect an effect of most current levels of antibacterial drug resistance on clinical outcomes for patients who have CAP. Yet, practice patterns are shifting in response to the perception that current levels of drug resistance necessitate changes in treatment patterns. This is unfortunate because it severely limits one's ability to continue to monitor the effectiveness of available therapies in light of changing patterns of antibacterial drug resistance. If levels of drug resistance continue to rise, it is likely that outcomes from those drug treatments will be affected adversely. In this regard, the recent licensing of a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine for infants and young children may have an important effect on future trends in antibacterial drug resistance. The vaccine reduces childhood carriage of vaccine serotypes,which are among the most common serotypes found among drug-resistant isolates, and may reduce transmission of these serotypes to adults [65]. In conclusion, antibacterial drug resistance has not reduced substantially the effectiveness of first-line treatments for CAP. Whether levels of drug resistance will continue to increase or decline is unknown. Therefore,carefully designed outcomes studies likely will continue to be essential to help define optimal therapy for patients who have CAP.

Effect of sucralfate on antibiotic therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in mice

It has been documented that sucralfate, a basic aluminum salt, enhances the efficacies of antibiotics against Helicobacter pylori, resulting in eradication rates comparable to those associated with the use of proton pump inhibitors. However, its mechanism of action remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate sucralfate's ability to complement antibiotic treatment of H. pylori infection in vivo. Four weeks following induced H. pylori infection, clarithromycin (CAM) and amoxicillin (AMPC) were administered orally to C57BL/6 mice for 5 days, both with and without sucralfate or lansoprazole. When sucralfate was concurrently given with CAM and AMPC at the maximum noninhibitory doses for the treatment of H. pylori infection, the bacterial clearance rates were comparable to those achieved by treatment with lansoprazole plus those antibiotics. The results of pharmacokinetic studies showed that lansoprazole delayed gastric clearance and accelerated the absorption of CAM, whereas sucralfate suppressed both gastric clearance and absorption. AMPC was undetectable in all samples. Scanning electron microscopy with a microscope to which a energy dispersive spectrometer was attached revealed that aluminum-containing aggregated substances coated the mucosa surrounding H. pylori in mice receiving sucralfate plus antibiotics, whereas the gastric surface and pits where H. pylori had attached were clearly visible in mice receiving lansoprazole plus antibiotics. The addition of sucralfate to the antibiotic suspension resulted in a more viscous mixture that bound to the H. pylori-infected mucosa and that inhibited the loss of CAM bioavailability in the acidic environment. Sucralfate delays gastric clearance of CAM and physically captures H. pylori through the creation of an adherent mucus, which leads to bacterial clearance.

Rapid infectious killers

Central to the practice of emergency medicine is the ability to identify patients in whom immediate intervention is needed to prevent long-term morbidity and mortality. This article has highlighted some of the characteristics of several infectious diseases that may become fatal quickly if not treated quickly and appropriately by physicians. Bacterial meningitis,necrotizing soft tissue infections, invasive gram-negative disease, pneumo-coccal pneumonia, and West Nile encephalitis all require prompt recognition and treatment by emergency care providers.

Cotransport of Macrolide and Fluoroquinolones, a Beneficial Interaction Reversing P-glycoprotein Efflux

The purpose of this study was to determine the interactions of erythromycin and various fluoroquinolones with P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and in turn assess their effects on transport kinetics across a model cell monolayer. MDCKII-MDRI cells were selected as a model monolayer to evaluate the effects of various fluoroquinolones, ie, norfloxacin, lomefloxacin, ofloxacin, enoxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, and sparfloxacin on the P-gp-mediated efflux of H-cyclosporine (CsA) and C-erythromycin. IC50 values associated with grepafloxacin-, levofloxacin-, and sparfloxacin-mediated inhibition of P-gp were calculated across Caco-2 cells with erythromycin as the model P-gp substrate. Transport of erythromycin was then studied with P-gp saturable concentrations of fluoroquinolones. Western blot analysis was performed on Caco-2 cells to confirm P-gp expression. Only grepafloxacin elevated the uptake of H-CsA across the MDCKII-MDRI cell monolayer, whereas norfloxacin, lomefloxacin, ofloxacin, and enoxacin did not exert any effect on H-CsA uptake. Inhibition studies indicate that grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, and sparfloxacin are potent inhibitors of P-gp-mediated efflux of C-erythromycin in the MDCKII-MDRI cell monolayer. Similar studies were conducted across Caco-2 cells and IC50 values were calculated. Inhibitory potency of sparfloxacin (IC50 = 607.6 microM) exceeded that of levofloxacin (IC50 = 1644 microM) and grepafloxacin (IC50 = 2266 microM). Permeability ratio (BL-AP/AP-BL) of C-erythromycin was found to be 8.67, which was reduced to 1.18, 1.83, and 1.39 in the presence of grepafloxacin (1 mmol/L), levofloxacin (5 mmol/L), and sparfloxacin (1 mmol/L), respectively. Log partition coefficient of grepafloxacin (1.58), levofloxacin (0.553), and sparfloxacin (0.45) were correlated with the inhibition of P-gp. Western blot analysis indicated the expression of P-gp in Caco-2 cells. Fluoroquinolones like grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, and especially sparfloxacin significantly inhibit the efflux of erythromycin, which can modulate oral absorption and disposition of macrolide drugs when administered concomitantly.

A review of clinical failures associated with macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

The emerging reports of clinical failures using macrolides and their associations with macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae prompted us to review the literature describing these cases. Thirty-three cases reporting macrolide treatment failure during treatment of pneumococcal infections were available for review. The most prevalent diagnosis (24/27 or 88.8% of available diagnoses) was community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Previous medical history included cardiopulmonary disease in eight (24.2%) and immunocompromised states in five (15.1%) patients. The majority, 31/33 (93.9%) of patients received oral macrolide treatment in an outpatient setting. S. pneumoniae was isolated from the blood in 26 (78.8%) of 33 patients, three (9.1%) patients had bacteria present in both blood and cerebrospinal fluid, two (6%) patients grew S. pneumoniae from blood and bronchial washings and two (6%) patients had positive sputum cultures. The MLS(B) phenotype was the most predominant phenotype present in 12 (63.2%) of 19 patients. After failing initial macrolide treatment, 26 (78.8%) of 33 patients received parenteral antibiotic treatment. Of 33 patients admitted to hospital, 29 (87.8%) had their outcome described as 'survived'.

Streptococcus pneumoniae: epidemiology and patterns of resistance

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a leading cause of bacterial pneumonia, meningitis, otitis media, and sinusitis; it results in significant morbidity and mortality in patients with pneumonia and meningitis. The pneumococcus is a common colonizing bacterium in the respiratory tract; it is especially common in the respiratory tracts of children, where it is frequently exposed to antimicrobial agents. This exposure can lead to resistance. Penicillin nonsusceptibility is found in nearly 40% of strains causing disease in adults, although often these cases are treatable with appropriate dosing regimens of many oral and parenteral beta-lactam agents. In the United States resistance to macrolides is widespread--averaging approximately 28%--but geographically variable, ranging from 23% in the northwest to 30% in the northeast. Resistance to tetracyclines and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole are reported in approximately 20% and 35% of isolates, respectively, and resistance to multiple classes of agents is increasingly common. Amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, respiratory fluoroquinolones, and clindamycin are currently the most effective agents for treatment of respiratory tract infections caused by S pneumoniae, with >90% of isolates in the United States being susceptible. Vancomycin is the only agent against which resistance has not emerged. Patient groups that are at increased risk for developing resistant pneumococcal infections have been identified and include patients with malignancies, human immunodeficiency virus infection, and sickle-cell disease. Judicious use of antimicrobials is the key to preventing the emergence of further resistance, particularly as few new classes of agents are likely to become available for clinical use in the short term.

In vitro antagonism between β-lactam and macrolide in Streptococcus pneumoniae: how important is the antibiotic order?

We found that the in vitro interaction between penicillin or cefotaxime and erythromycin against Streptococcus pneumoniae varies depending on the order of antibiotic exposure. Time-kill experiments were performed with penicillin, cefotaxime, erythromycin and different order combinations of both beta-lactams with erythromycin. The mean difference between the colony count at 0 and 6h for penicillin, cefotaxime and erythromycin tested separately was 3.5 log cfu/mL, 2.4 and 1.5 respectively for susceptible strains. The mean difference for the combination of beta-lactam and erythromycin studied simultaneously was 1.8 log cfu/mL for these strains. The association of penicillin or cefotaxime with erythromycin added two hours later showed an activity similar to those of beta-lactam alone (mean difference was 3.0 for this association with penicillin and 2.5 with cefotaxime). Therefore, the antagonistic effect of macrolide activity could be less important if erythromycin was administrated after beta-lactam.

Comparative in vitro activity of antiribosomal agents on penicillin-susceptible and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in relation to their resistance genotypes

A collection of 326 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from blood, cerebrospinal fluid, bronchoalveolar lavage, transtracheal aspirate or sputum from January 1996-June 2002 were included in this study. The activity of clarithromycin, clindamycin, telithromycin, linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin against penicillin G and erythromycin A susceptible and resistant pneumococci were determined; the erythromycin A resistance phenotypes and genotypes were identified and susceptibilities of these agents were assessed according to the resistance genotypes. MICs were determined for all strains of pneumococci using an agar dilution method. MLS(B) resistance phenotypes were determined by the double disk (erythromycin A and clindamycin) diffusion method. Genetic determinants for macrolide resistance were identified by PCR using primers specific for erm(B) and mef(A). Erythromycin A resistance was detected in 13.8% of the strains. MLS(B) resistance phenotype was observed in 82% of these (60% being cMLS(B) and 40% being iMLS(B)), and M type resistance in about 18%. All the MLS(B) phenotype strains except four, revealed the presence of erm(B) gene and all except one M phenotype strains revealed the mef(A) gene. Of the erythromycin A resistant pneumococci about 49% were also resistant to clindamycin. No strains were resistant to telithromycin, quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid. Telithromycin had the lowest MIC values for both erythromycin A resistant and susceptible strains of all the antiribosomal agents tested. The most prevalent mechanism of macrolide resistance was mediated by the erm(B) gene leading to the expression of MLS(B) phenotype. Telithromycin was the most active antiribosomal agent, regardless of the macrolide resistance genotype of the pneumococci tested.

The role of resistance and impact on appropriate antimicrobial use

Antibiotic resistance is a subject of growing concern throughout the medical community. Addressing drug resistance requires that practitioners understand the mechanisms of resistance and the methods of treating infections effectively while minimizing the emergence of resistant organisms. When making antibiotic selections, clinicians should consider a number of factors in addition to the drug's antimicrobial activity. These include the epidemiology of regional resistance and the antibiotic's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Combination therapies should be considered and appropriate durations of therapy addressed. Developing clear practice guidelines for managing infectious disease can help practitioners reduce inappropriate antibiotic use and minimize the emergence of resistance.