In vivo pharmacodynamics of new-generation β-lactamase inhibitor taniborbactam (formerly VNRX-5133) in combination with cefepime against serine-β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria

Evolving resistance landscape in gram-negative pathogens: An update on β-lactam and β-lactam-inhibitor treatment combinations for carbapenem-resistant organisms

Antibiotic resistance has become a global threat as it is continuously growing due to the evolution of β-lactamases diminishing the activity of classic β-lactam (BL) antibiotics. Recent antibiotic discovery and development efforts have led to the availability of β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) with activity against extended-spectrum β-lactamases as well as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO). Nevertheless, there is still a lack of drugs that target metallo-β-lactamases (MBL), which hydrolyze carbapenems efficiently, and oxacillinases (OXA) often present in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. This review aims to provide a snapshot of microbiology, pharmacology, and clinical data for currently available BL/BLI treatment options as well as agents in late stage development for CRO harboring various β-lactamases including MBL and OXA-enzymes.

In vitro pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of FL058 (a novel beta-lactamase inhibitor) combined with meropenem against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales

Objective: FL058 is a novel beta-lactamase inhibitor with a broad spectrum of activity and a favorable safety profile. The objective of this study was to evaluate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships for the combination of FL058 and meropenem in an in vitro infection model. Methods: By simulating human concentration-time profiles in the in vitro model, meropenem combined with FL058 when administered 1 g/0.5 g, 1 g/1 g, 2 g/1 g, and 2 g/2 g q8h by 3-h infusion achieved approximately 2- and 4-log10 kill to KPC/OXA-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli; the combination therapy could not inhibit NDM-producing K. pneumoniae but could maintain NDM-producing E. coli around a baseline. Results: The PK/PD indexes that best described the bacterial killing from baseline in log10 CFU/mL at 24 h were the percent time of free drug above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (%fT > MIC, MIC with FL058 at 4 mg/L) for meropenem and the percent time of free drug above 1 mg/L (%fT > 1 mg/L) for FL058. The targets for achieving a static effect and the 1- and 2-log10 kill were 74, 83, and 99 for %fT > MIC of meropenem and 40, 48, and 64 for %fT > 1 mg/L of FL058, respectively. The PK/PD index of %fT > 1 mg/L can provide a basis for evaluating clinical dosing regimens for FL058 combined with meropenem. Conclusion: FL058 combined with meropenem might be a potential treatment for KPC- and/or OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales infection.

Cefepime-Taniborbactam in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales species and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa are global health threats. Cefepime-taniborbactam is an investigational β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against Enterobacterales species and P. aeruginosa expressing serine and metallo-β-lactamases.

METHODS

In this phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned hospitalized adults with complicated urinary tract infection (UTI), including acute pyelonephritis, in a 2:1 ratio to receive intravenous cefepime-taniborbactam (2.5 g) or meropenem (1 g) every 8 hours for 7 days; this duration could be extended up to 14 days in case of bacteremia. The primary outcome was both microbiologic and clinical success (composite success) on trial days 19 to 23 in the microbiologic intention-to-treat (microITT) population (patients who had a qualifying gram-negative pathogen against which both study drugs were active). A prespecified superiority analysis of the primary outcome was performed after confirmation of noninferiority.

RESULTS

Of the 661 patients who underwent randomization, 436 (66.0%) were included in the microITT population. The mean age of the patients was 56.2 years, and 38.1% were 65 years of age or older. In the microITT population, 57.8% of the patients had complicated UTI, 42.2% had acute pyelonephritis, and 13.1% had bacteremia. Composite success occurred in 207 of 293 patients (70.6%) in the cefepime-taniborbactam group and in 83 of 143 patients (58.0%) in the meropenem group. Cefepime-taniborbactam was superior to meropenem regarding the primary outcome (treatment difference, 12.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 3.1 to 22.2; P = 0.009). Differences in treatment response were sustained at late follow-up (trial days 28 to 35), when cefepime-taniborbactam had higher composite success and clinical success. Adverse events occurred in 35.5% and 29.0% of patients in the cefepime-taniborbactam group and the meropenem group, respectively, with headache, diarrhea, constipation, hypertension, and nausea the most frequently reported; the frequency of serious adverse events was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefepime-taniborbactam was superior to meropenem for the treatment of complicated UTI that included acute pyelonephritis, with a safety profile similar to that of meropenem. (Funded by Venatorx Pharmaceuticals and others; CERTAIN-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03840148.).

Examining the activity of cefepime-taniborbactam against Burkholderia cepacia complex and Burkholderia gladioli isolated from cystic fibrosis patients in the United States

The novel clinical-stage β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination, cefepime-taniborbactam, demonstrates promising activity toward many Gram-negative bacteria producing class A, B, C, and/or D β-lactamases. We tested this combination against a panel of 150 Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) and Burkholderia gladioli strains. The addition of taniborbactam to cefepime shifted cefepime minimum inhibitory concentrations toward the provisionally susceptible range in 59% of the isolates tested. Therefore, cefepime-taniborbactam possessed similar activity as first-line agents, ceftazidime and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, supporting further development.

Cefepime in vivo activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales that test as cefepime susceptible or susceptible-dose dependent in vitro: implications for clinical microbiology laboratory and clinicians

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a public health concern. Among these isolates, there are reports of isolates that test as cefepime susceptible or susceptible-dose dependent (SDD) in vitro despite presence of a carbapenemase. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of cefepime against carbapenemase-producing (CP-CRE) and non-producing (non-CP-CRE) isolates with a range of cefepime MICs.

METHODS

Reference broth microdilution and modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) were performed on genotypically characterized clinical CRE isolates. Ultimately, CP-CRE (n = 21; blaKPC) and non-CP-CRE (n = 19) isolates with a distribution of cefepime MICs (≤0.5 to >256 mg/L) were utilized in the murine thigh infection model. Mice were treated with cefepime human-simulated regimens (HSRs) representative of a standard dose (1 g q12h 0.5 h infusion) or the SDD dose (2 g q8h 0.5 h infusion). Efficacy was assessed as the change in bacterial growth at 24 h compared with 0 h control, where ≥1 log bacterial reduction is considered translational value for clinical efficacy.

RESULTS

Among both cohorts of CRE isolates, i.e. CP-CRE and non-CP-CRE, that tested as SDD to cefepime in vitro, 1 log bacterial reduction was not attainable with cefepime. Further blunting of cefepime efficacy was observed among CP-CRE isolates compared with non-CP-CRE across both susceptible and SDD categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Data indicate to avoid cefepime for the treatment of serious infections caused by CRE isolates that test as cefepime susceptible or SDD. Data also provide evidence that isolates with the same antibiotic MIC may have different pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles due to their antimicrobial resistance mechanism.

Novel Antimicrobial Agents for Gram-Negative Pathogens

Gram-negative bacterial resistance to antimicrobials has had an exponential increase at a global level during the last decades and represent an everyday challenge, especially for the hospital practice of our era. Concerted efforts from the researchers and the industry have recently provided several novel promising antimicrobials, resilient to various bacterial resistance mechanisms. There are new antimicrobials that became commercially available during the last five years, namely, cefiderocol, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, eravacycline, omadacycline, and plazomicin. Furthermore, other agents are in advanced development, having reached phase 3 clinical trials, namely, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-enmetazobactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, sulopenem, tebipenem, and benapenem. In this present review, we critically discuss the characteristics of the above-mentioned antimicrobials, their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties and the current clinical data.

In Vitro Activity of Cefepime-Taniborbactam and Comparators against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacilli from 2018 to 2020: Results from the Global Evaluation of Antimicrobial Resistance via Surveillance (GEARS) Program

Taniborbactam is a novel cyclic boronate β-lactamase inhibitor in clinical development in combination with cefepime. We assessed the in vitro activity of cefepime-taniborbactam and comparators against a 2018-2020 collection of Enterobacterales (n = 13,731) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 4,619) isolates cultured from infected patients attending hospitals in 56 countries. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution. Taniborbactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 μg/mL. Isolates with cefepime-taniborbactam MICs of ≥16 μg/mL underwent whole-genome sequencing. β-lactamase genes were identified in meropenem-resistant isolates by PCR/Sanger sequencing. Against Enterobacterales, taniborbactam reduced the cefepime MIC90 value by >64-fold (from >16 to 0.25 μg/mL). At ≤16 μg/mL, cefepime-taniborbactam inhibited 99.7% of all Enterobacterales isolates; >97% of isolates with multidrug-resistant (MDR) and ceftolozane-tazobactam-resistant phenotypes; ≥90% of isolates with meropenem-resistant, difficult-to-treat-resistant (DTR), meropenem-vaborbactam-resistant, and ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant phenotypes; 100% of VIM-positive, AmpC-positive, and KPC-positive isolates; 98.7% of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive; 98.8% of OXA-48-like-positive; and 84.6% of NDM-positive isolates. Against P. aeruginosa, taniborbactam reduced the cefepime MIC90 value by 4-fold (from 32 to 8 μg/mL). At ≤16 μg/mL, cefepime-taniborbactam inhibited 97.4% of all P. aeruginosa isolates; ≥85% of isolates with meropenem-resistant, MDR, and meropenem-vaborbactam-resistant phenotypes; >75% of isolates with DTR, ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant, and ceftolozane-tazobactam-resistant phenotypes; and 87.4% of VIM-positive isolates. Multiple potential mechanisms, including carriage of IMP, certain alterations in PBP3, permeability (porin) defects, and possibly, upregulation of efflux were present in most isolates with cefepime-taniborbactam MICs of ≥16 μg/mL. We conclude that cefepime-taniborbactam exhibited potent in vitro activity against Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa and inhibited most carbapenem-resistant isolates, including those carrying serine carbapenemases or NDM/VIM metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs).

Biochemical exploration of β-lactamase inhibitors

The alarming rise of microbial resistance to antibiotics has severely limited the efficacy of current treatment options. The prevalence of β-lactamase enzymes is a significant contributor to the emergence of antibiotic resistance. There are four classes of β-lactamases: A, B, C, and D. Class B is the metallo-β-lactamase, while the rest are serine β-lactamases. The clinical use of β-lactamase inhibitors began as an attempt to combat β-lactamase-mediated resistance. Although β-lactamase inhibitors alone are ineffective against bacteria, research has shown that combining inhibitors with antibiotics is a safe and effective treatment that not only prevents β-lactamase formation but also broadens the range of activity. These inhibitors may cause either temporary or permanent inhibition. The development of new β-lactamase inhibitors will be a primary focus of future research. This study discusses recent advances in our knowledge of the biochemistry behind β-lactam breakdown, with special emphasis on the mechanism of inhibitors for β-lactam complexes with β-lactamase. The study also focuses on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of all inhibitors and then applies them in clinical settings. Our analysis and discussion of the challenges that exist in designing inhibitors might help pharmaceutical researchers address root issues and develop more effective inhibitors.

In vivo pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of cefepime/taniborbactam combination against cefepime-non-susceptible Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a murine pneumonia model

BACKGROUND

Cefepime/taniborbactam is a cephalosporin/bicyclic boronate β-lactamase inhibitor combination in clinical development for nosocomial pneumonia due to MDR Gram-negative bacteria. A murine pneumonia model was used to characterize cefepime/taniborbactam in vivo pharmacodynamics against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.

METHODS

Clinical cefepime-non-susceptible Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa strains expressing serine carbapenemases and/or other cefepime-hydrolysing β-lactamases with cefepime/taniborbactam combination MICs of 0.12-16 mg/L were used. Cefepime and taniborbactam human-simulated regimens equivalent to clinical doses (i.e. 2/0.5 g q8h) were established in the pneumonia model. The in vivo activity of the cefepime human-simulated regimen given alone or concomitantly with escalating taniborbactam exposures against eight Enterobacterales and four P. aeruginosa strains was assessed. Taniborbactam pharmacokinetics were evaluated to determine systemic exposures of regimens used; taniborbactam fAUC0-24/MIC values required for efficacy were estimated using the Hill equation. In addition, the in vivo activity of the cefepime/taniborbactam combination human-simulated regimen was assessed against 18 strains.

RESULTS

Among Enterobacterales, median taniborbactam fAUC0-24/MIC values associated with stasis and 1 log kill were 0.96 and 4.03, respectively, while for P. aeruginosa, requirements were 1.35 and 3.02 for stasis and 1 log kill, respectively. The cefepime/taniborbactam human-simulated regimen produced >2 log kill in 14/18 strains and >1 log kill in 18/18 strains.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefepime/taniborbactam produced marked in vivo bactericidal activity against cefepime-non-susceptible Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates with cefepime/taniborbactam MICs up to and including 16 mg/L in the pneumonia model. Assessments of the probability of clinical attainment of the identified targets should be undertaken to support the selected cefepime/taniborbactam dose for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia.

Bronchopulmonary disposition of IV cefepime/taniborbactam (2-0.5 g) administered over 2 h in healthy adult subjects

INTRODUCTION

Taniborbactam (formerly VNRX-5133) is an investigational β-lactamase inhibitor in clinical development in combination with cefepime for the treatment of MDR Gram-negative pathogens.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety profile and pulmonary disposition of 2-0.5 g cefepime/taniborbactam administered as a 2 h IV infusion every 8 h following three doses in healthy adult subjects.

METHODS

In this Phase 1 trial, open-label study, plasma samples were collected over the last dosing interval, and subjects (n = 20) were randomized to undergo bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) at four timepoints after the last dose. Drug concentrations in plasma (total and free as determined by protein binding), BAL fluid and alveolar macrophages (AM) were determined by LC-MS/MS, and the urea correction method was used to calculate epithelial lining fluid (ELF) drug concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by non-compartmental analysis.

RESULTS

Mean (±SD) taniborbactam Cmax and AUC0-8 in plasma were 24.1 ± 4.1 mg/L and 81.9 ± 13.9 mg·h/L, respectively. Corresponding values for cefepime were 118.4 ± 29.7 mg/L and 346.7 ± 71.3 mg·h/L. Protein binding was 0% for taniborbactam and 22.4% for cefepime. Mean taniborbactam concentrations (mg/L) at 2, 4, 6 and 8 h were 3.9, 1.9, 1.0 and 0.3 in ELF and 12.4, 11.5, 14.3 and 14.9 in AM, with corresponding AUC0-8 ELF of 13.8 and AUC0-8 AM of 106.0 mg·h/L. Cefepime AUC0-8 ELF was 77.9 mg·h/L. No serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

The observed bronchopulmonary exposures of taniborbactam and cefepime can be employed to design optimal dosing regimens for clinical trials in patients with pneumonia.

PHT427 as an effective New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-1 (NDM-1) inhibitor restored the susceptibility of meropenem against Enterobacteriaceae producing NDM-1

Introduction

With the increasingly serious problem of bacterial drug resistance caused by NDM-1, it is an important strategy to find effective inhibitors to assist β-lactam antibiotic treatment against NDM-1 resistant bacteria. In this study, PHT427 (4-dodecyl-N-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl-benzenesulfonamide) was identified as a novel NDM-1 inhibitor and restored the susceptibility of meropenem against Enterobacteriaceae producing NDM-1.

Methods

We used a high throughput screening model to find NDM-1 inhibitor in the library of small molecular compounds. The interaction between the hit compound PHT427 and NDM-1 was analyzed by fluorescence quenching, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assay, and molecular docking analysis. The efficacy of the compound in combination with meropenem was evaluated by determining the FICIs of Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)/pET30a(+)-bla _NDM-1 and Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical strain C1928 (producing NDM-1). In addition, the mechanism of the inhibitory effect of PHT427 on NDM-1 was studied by site mutation, SPR, and zinc supplementation assays.

Results

PHT427 was identified as an inhibitor of NDM-1. It could significantly inhibit the activity of NDM-1 with an IC₅₀ of 1.42 μmol/L, and restored the susceptibility of meropenem against E. coli BL21(DE3)/pET30a(+)-bla _NDM-1 and K. pneumoniae clinical strain C1928 (producing NDM-1) in vitro. The mechanism study indicated that PHT427 could act on the zinc ions at the active site of NDM-1 and the catalytic key amino acid residues simultaneously. The mutation of Asn220 and Gln123 abolished the affinity of NDM-1 by PHT427 via SPR assay.

Discussion

This is the first report that PHT427 is a promising lead compound against carbapenem-resistant bacteria and it merits chemical optimization for drug development.

In vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ceftibuten/ledaborbactam, a novel oral β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination

OBJECTIVES

Oral β-lactam treatment options for MDR Enterobacterales are lacking. Ledaborbactam (formerly VNRX-5236) is a novel orally bioavailable β-lactamase inhibitor that restores ceftibuten activity against Ambler Class A-, C- and D-producing Enterobacterales. We assessed the ledaborbactam exposure needed to produce bacteriostasis against ceftibuten-resistant Enterobacterales in the presence of humanized ceftibuten exposures in the neutropenic murine thigh infection model.

METHODS

Twelve ceftibuten-resistant clinical isolates (six Klebsiella pneumoniae, five Escherichia coli and one Enterobacter cloacae) were utilized. Ceftibuten/ledaborbactam MICs ranged from 0.12 to 2 mg/L (ledaborbactam fixed at 4 mg/L). A ceftibuten murine dosing regimen mimicking ceftibuten 600 mg q12h human exposure was developed and administered alone and in combination with escalating exposures of ledaborbactam. The log10 cfu/thigh change at 24 h relative to 0 h controls was plotted against ledaborbactam fAUC0-24/MIC and the Hill equation was used to determine exposures associated with bacteriostasis.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD 0 h bacterial burden was 5.96 ± 0.24 log10 cfu/thigh. Robust growth (3.12 ± 0.93 log10 cfu/thigh) was achieved in untreated control mice. Growth of 2.51 ± 1.09 log10 cfu/thigh was observed after administration of humanized ceftibuten monotherapy. Individual isolate exposure-response relationships were strong (mean ± SD R2 = 0.82 ± 0.15). The median ledaborbactam fAUC0-24/MIC associated with stasis was 3.59 among individual isolates and 6.92 in the composite model.

CONCLUSIONS

Ledaborbactam fAUC0-24/MIC exposures for stasis were quantified with a ceftibuten human-simulated regimen against β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales. This study supports the continued development of oral ceftibuten/ledaborbactam etzadroxil (formerly ceftibuten/VNRX-7145).

Antibiotics in development for multiresistant gram-negative bacilli

The rapid increase in antibiotic(ATB) resistance among Gram-negative bacilli(BGN), especially in strains of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii, with high resistance patterns (XDR), poses a huge threat to health systems worldwide. In the last decade, different ATBs have been developed against XDR, some of which combine a lactam β along with a β-lactamase inhibitor, while others use non-β-lactam inhibitors. Most of them have adequate "in vitro" activity on several β-lactamases of class A, C and D of Ambler. However, combinations such as Ceftazidime/avibactam, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam and Meropenem/vaborbactam have no activity against metallo-β-lactamases(MβL). New combinations such as Aztreonan/AVI, Cefepime/Zidebactam, or new cephalosporins such as Cefiderocol, have efficacy against MβL enzymes. Although some of these combinations are already approved and in the commercialization phase, many of them have yet to define their place within the treatment of microorganisms with high resistance through clinical studies.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133) with Cefepime in Subjects with Various Degrees of Renal Impairment

Taniborbactam, an investigational β-lactamase inhibitor that is active against both serine- and metallo-β-lactamases, is being developed in combination with cefepime to treat serious infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Anticipating the use of cefepime-taniborbactam in patients with impaired renal function, an open-label, single-dose clinical study was performed to examine the pharmacokinetics of both drugs in subjects with various degrees of renal function. Hemodialysis-dependent subjects were also studied to examine the amounts of cefepime and taniborbactam dialyzed. Single intravenous infusions of 2 g cefepime and 0.5 g taniborbactam coadministered over 2 h were examined, with hemodialysis-dependent subjects receiving doses both on- and off-dialysis. No subjects experienced serious adverse events or discontinued treatment due to adverse events. The majority of adverse events observed were mild in severity, and there were no trends in the safety of cefepime-taniborbactam related to declining renal function or the timing of hemodialysis. Clinically significant and similar decreases in drug clearance with declining renal function were observed for both cefepime and taniborbactam. The respective decreases in geometric mean clearance for subjects with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment compared to subjects with normal renal function were 18%, 63%, and 78% for cefepime and 15%, 63%, and 81% for taniborbactam, respectively. Decreases in clearance were similar for both drugs and were shown to be proportional to decreases in renal function. Both cefepime and taniborbactam were dialyzable, with similar amounts removed during 4 h of hemodialysis. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03690362.

Microbiological, Clinical, and PK/PD Features of the New Anti-Gram-Negative Antibiotics: β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors in Combination and Cefiderocol—An All-Inclusive Guide for Clinicians

Bacterial resistance mechanisms are continuously and rapidly evolving. This is particularly true for Gram-negative bacteria. Over the last decade, the strategy to develop new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLs/BLIs) combinations has paid off and results from phase 3 and real-world studies are becoming available for several compounds. Cefiderocol warrants a separate discussion for its peculiar mechanism of action. Considering the complexity of summarizing and integrating the emerging literature data of clinical outcomes, microbiological mechanisms, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of the new BL/BLI and cefiderocol, we aimed to provide an overview of data on the following compounds: aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, cefiderocol, ceftaroline/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/nacubactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. Each compound is described in a dedicated section by experts in infectious diseases, microbiology, and pharmacology, with tables providing at-a-glance information.

The Role of Colistin in the Era of New β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

With the current crisis related to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB), classical treatment approaches with so-called “old-fashion antibiotics” are generally unsatisfactory. Newly approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) should be considered as the first-line treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infections. However, colistin can be prescribed for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections caused by CR-GNB by relying on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Similarly, colistin can still be regarded as an alternative therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) until new and effective agents are approved. Using colistin in combination regimens (i.e., including at least two in vitro active agents) can be considered in CRAB infections, and CRE infections with high risk of mortality. In conclusion, new BLBLIs have largely replaced colistin for the treatment of CR-GNB infections. Nevertheless, colistin may be needed for the treatment of CRAB infections and in the setting where the new BLBLIs are currently unavailable. In addition, with the advent of rapid diagnostic methods and novel antimicrobials, the application of personalized medicine has gained significant importance in the treatment of CRE infections.

Clinical exposure-response relationship of cefepime/taniborbactam against Gram-negative organisms in the murine complicated urinary tract infection model

OBJECTIVES

Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) are frequently encountered in hospitals and ICUs. Increasingly, the causative pathogens harbour enzymatic resistance mechanisms. Taniborbactam is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor with activity against Ambler class A, B, C and D β-lactamases. Herein, we assessed the efficacy of cefepime alone and the combination cefepime/taniborbactam in a neutropenic murine cUTI model.

METHODS

Eighteen cefepime-resistant clinical isolates (9 Enterobacterales, 3 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 6 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; cefepime MIC = 32 to >512 mg/L) were assessed. Cefepime/taniborbactam MICs ranged from 0.06 to 128 mg/L. Human-simulated plasma regimens (HSRs) of cefepime alone and in combination with taniborbactam were developed in the murine cUTI model. The efficacy of cefepime HSR and cefepime/taniborbactam HSR was determined as the change in log10 cfu/kidney at 48 h compared with 48 h controls.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD initial bacterial burden was 5.66 ± 0.56 log10 cfu/kidney, which increased to 9.05 ± 0.39 log10 cfu/kidney at 48 h. The cefepime HSR was ineffective, as bacterial burden was similar to untreated controls (-0.14 ± 0.40 change in log10 cfu/kidney). In contrast, cefepime/taniborbactam exhibited substantial killing, with log10 cfu/kidney changes of -5.48 ± 1.3, -4.79 ± 0.3 and -5.04 ± 0.7 for ESBL/AmpC-, KPC- and OXA-48-harbouring Enterobacterales, respectively. Cefepime/taniborbactam also exhibited robust killing of P. aeruginosa (-6.5 ± 0.26) and S. maltophilia (-5.66 ± 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

Humanized exposures of cefepime/taniborbactam achieved robust killing of Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa and S. maltophilia harbouring ESBL, AmpC, KPC and/or OXA-48. These data support the role of cefepime/taniborbactam for cUTI treatment for cefepime/taniborbactam MICs up to 32 mg/L.

In vitro comparative activity of the new beta-lactamase inhibitor taniborbactam with cefepime or meropenem against Klebsiella pneumoniae and cefepime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa metallo-beta-lactamase-producing clinical isolates

Metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing Gram-negative bacteria are increasing worldwide and very few agents are active against these pathogens. Taniborbactam (formerly VNRX-5133) is a newly developed bicyclic boronate beta-lactamase inhibitor that directly inhibits all four Ambler classes of beta-lactamases. In the present study the in vitro activity of cefepime or meropenem combined with taniborbactam against 100 Klebsiella pneumoniae and cefepime combined with taniborbactam against 100 Pseudomonas aeruginosa molecularly characterized MBL-producing strains were investigated using ISO standard broth microdilution assays and compared with a panel of antimicrobial agents that are used in clinical practice (amikacin, aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gentamicin, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, tigecycline, ceftolozane-tazobactam, cefepime-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, ceftazidime-avibactam). For K. pneumoniae isolates, the MIC₉₀ values were ≥64 mg/L for all drugs except cefepime-taniborbactam (16 mg/L; 87% inhibited at ≤8/4 mg/L), meropenem-taniborbactam (4 mg/L; 94% inhibited at ≤8/4 mg/L) and tigecycline (8 mg/L), with high levels of resistance (≥65%) found for all approved comparator antimicrobials tested. For P. aeruginosa, the MIC₉₀ values were ≥64 mg/L for all drugs except aztreonam (32 mg/L), cefepime-taniborbactam (32 mg/L; 88% inhibited at ≤16/4 mg/L) and ciprofloxacin (32 mg/L), with high levels of resistance (≥73%) for all approved drugs except aztreonam (27%). Taniborbactam reduced cefepime and meropenem MICs by a median 5 and 7 two-fold dilutions to ≤8 mg/L in 87% and 94% of MBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates, and cefepime MICs by a median 5 two-fold dilutions to ≤16 mg/L in 86% of MBL-producing P. aeruginosa, respectively. The combinations cefepime-taniborbactam and meropenem-taniborbactam are promising alternative treatment options for infections by MBL-producing isolates.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics in Human Volunteers of Taniborbactam (VNRX-5133), a Novel Intravenous β-Lactamase Inhibitor

Taniborbactam (formerly VNRX-5133), an investigational β-lactamase inhibitor active against both serine- and metallo-β-lactamases, is being developed in combination with cefepime to treat serious infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. This first-in-human study evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of taniborbactam in healthy adult subjects. Single doses of 62.5 to 1,500 mg taniborbactam and multiple doses of 250 to 750 mg taniborbactam every 8 h (q8h) for 10 days were examined; all taniborbactam doses were administered as a 2-h intravenous infusion. No subjects experienced serious adverse events or discontinued treatment due to adverse events. The most common adverse event in both placebo- and taniborbactam-treated subjects was headache. The pharmacokinetics of taniborbactam were similar to the pharmacokinetics reported for cefepime. Taniborbactam demonstrated dose-proportional pharmacokinetics with low intersubject variability. Following single doses and with extended sampling, the mean terminal elimination half-life ranged from 3.4 to 5.8 h; however, the majority of exposure was characterized by an earlier phase with a half-life of about 2 h. Following multiple dosing, there was minimal accumulation of taniborbactam in plasma. At steady-state, approximately 90% of the administered dose of taniborbactam was recovered in urine as intact drug. There was no appreciable metabolism observed in either plasma or urine samples. (This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov under registration number NCT02955459.)

The Phenotypic/Genotypic Profile of OXA-10-like harboring, Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Using Validated Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic in vivo Models to Further Evaluate Enzyme Functionality and Clinical Implications

In vitro MICs and in vivo pharmacodynamics of ceftazidime and cefepime human-simulated regimens (HSR) against mCIM-positive P. aeruginosa harboring different OXA-10-like subtypes were described. The murine thigh model assessed ceftazidime (2g q8h HSR) and cefepime (2g and 1g q8h HSR). Phenotypes were similar despite possessing OXA-10-like subtypes with differing spectra. Ceftazidime produced ≥1-log₁₀ kill in all isolates. Cefepime activity was dose-dependent and MIC driven. This approach may be useful in assessing implications of β-lactamase variants.

The paradoxical in vivo activity of β-lactams against metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales is not restricted to carbapenems

BACKGROUND

Using murine models of infection, we previously reported the potent in vivo activity of carbapenems against MBL-producing Enterobacterales despite the observed resistance in vitro. In the current study, we examined the in vivo activity of a cefepime human-simulated regimen against MBL-producing Enterobacterales in a murine thigh infection model.

METHODS

A population of clinical isolates and isogenic engineered MBL-producing Enterobacterales transformants expressing MBLs but no detectable cefepime-hydrolysing serine β-lactamases were utilized. KPC-producing isolates were included as positive controls. Cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem MICs were determined using broth microdilution in conventional CAMHB and EDTA-supplemented (zinc-limited) broth. In vivo efficacy of a cefepime human-simulated regimen (2 g q8h as a 2 h infusion) was determined in the neutropenic murine thigh infection model against the test strains. Efficacy was measured as the change in log10 cfu/thigh at 24 h compared with 0 h controls.

RESULTS

MBL-producing Enterobacterales strains were found to be cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem non-susceptible in conventional broth. Supplementation with EDTA at a concentration of 300 mg/L resulted in multi-fold reduction in the MICs and restoration of susceptibility. In accordance with the MICs generated in zinc-limited broth, administration of a cefepime human-simulated regimen was associated with substantial bacterial reductions among mice infected with MBL-producing Enterobacterales. Absence of MIC reduction in zinc-limited broth and lack of efficacy among mice infected with KPC-producing isolates were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

For MBL-producing Enterobacterales, susceptibility testing with Mueller-Hinton broth, a zinc-rich testing medium, is flawed since it does not recapitulate the host environment, in which zinc concentrations are low.

Treatment for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections: recent advances and future directions

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a growing threat to human health worldwide. CRE often carry multiple resistance genes that limit treatment options and require longer durations of therapy, are more costly to treat, and necessitate therapies with increased toxicities when compared with carbapenem-susceptible strains. Here, we provide an overview of the mechanisms of resistance in CRE, the epidemiology of CRE infections worldwide, and available treatment options for CRE. We review recentlyapproved agents for the treatment of CRE, including ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol, and novel aminoglycosides and tetracyclines. We also discuss recent advances in phage therapy and antibiotics that are currently in development targeted to CRE. The potential for the development of resistance to these therapies remains high, and enhanced antimicrobial stewardship is imperative both to reduce the spread of CRE worldwide and to ensure continued access to efficacious treatment options.

Emerging Strategies to Combat β-Lactamase Producing ESKAPE Pathogens

Since the discovery of penicillin by Alexander Fleming in 1929 as a therapeutic agent against staphylococci, β-lactam antibiotics (BLAs) remained the most successful antibiotic classes against the majority of bacterial strains, reaching a percentage of 65% of all medical prescriptions. Unfortunately, the emergence and diversification of β-lactamases pose indefinite health issues, limiting the clinical effectiveness of all current BLAs. One solution is to develop β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) capable of restoring the activity of β-lactam drugs. In this review, we will briefly present the older and new BLAs classes, their mechanisms of action, and an update of the BLIs capable of restoring the activity of β-lactam drugs against ESKAPE (Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp.) pathogens. Subsequently, we will discuss several promising alternative approaches such as bacteriophages, antimicrobial peptides, nanoparticles, CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) cas technology, or vaccination developed to limit antimicrobial resistance in this endless fight against Gram-negative pathogens.