OUP accepted manuscript

Omadacycline drug susceptibility testing for non-tuberculous mycobacteria using oxyrase to overcome challenges with drug degradation

BACKGROUND

Drug susceptibility testing (DST) protocol of omadacycline against non-tuberculous mycobacteria has not yet been established. We developed a method to accurately determine MIC omadacycline MIC against Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab), Mycobacterium avium-complex (MAC), and Mycobacterium kansasii (Mkn).

METHODS

First, we identified the oxyrase concentration not affecting Mab, MAC, and Mkn growth followed by omadacycline MIC experiments with and without oxyrase using reference and clinical strains.

RESULTS

Oxyrase 0.5 % (v/v) stabilized omadacycline in the culture medium. The median omadacycline MIC was 1 mg/L for Mab and 8 mg/L for Mkn. For MAC, the median omadacycline MIC was 2 mg/L for M. avium, 256 mg/L for M. intracellulare, and 4 mg/L for M. chimaera (p < 0.0001). Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test revealed statistically lower MICs with oxyrase for all MAC subspecies (p < 0.0001), all Mab subspecies (p < 0.0001), and Mkn (p = 0.0002). The decrease in MICs with oxyrase was 17/18 of Mab, 14/19 of Mkn, 8/8 of M. avium, 4/5 M. chimera, but only 11/18 of M. intracellulare (p < 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Use of 0.5 % oxyrase could be a potential solution to reliable and reproducible omadacycline MIC of Mab. However, oxyrase demonstrated a variable effect in reducing MICs against MAC and Mkn.

Drugs for treating infections caused by non-tubercular mycobacteria: a narrative review from the study group on mycobacteria of the Italian Society of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine

BACKGROUND

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are generally free-living organism, widely distributed in the environment, with sporadic potential to infect. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the global incidence of NTM-related disease, spanning across all continents and an increased mortality after the diagnosis has been reported. The decisions on whether to treat or not and which drugs to use are complex and require a multidisciplinary approach as well as patients' involvement in the decision process.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This review aims at describing the drugs used for treating NTM-associated diseases emphasizing the efficacy, tolerability, optimization strategies as well as possible drugs that might be used in case of intolerance or resistance. We also reviewed data on newer compounds highlighting the lack of randomised clinical trials for many drugs but also encouraging preliminary data for others. We also focused on non-pharmacological interventions that need to be adopted during care of individuals with NTM-associated diseases CONCLUSIONS: Despite insufficient efficacy and poor tolerability this review emphasizes the improvement in patients' care and the needs for future studies in the field of anti-NTM treatments.

Ertapenem's therapeutic potential for Mycobacterium avium lung disease in the hollow fibre model

INTRODUCTION

Guideline-based therapy for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease achieves sustained sputum conversion rates in only 43-53% of patients. Repurposing of β-lactam antibiotics such as ertapenem could expedite design of more efficacious regimens, compared to developing new drugs.

METHODS

We performed an ertapenem exposure-response study in the hollow fibre system model of intracellular MAC (HFS-MAC). We recapitulated human-like intrapulmonary concentration-time profiles of eight once-daily intravenous doses of ertapenem over 28 days and performed repetitive sampling for drug concentration-time profiles and MAC burden. The % of time concentration persisted above MIC (%TMIC) mediating either 50% or 80% of maximal effect (E50, EC80) were identified. The EC80 was used as target exposure in a 10 000 subject Monte Carlo experiments for ertapenem doses of 1G, 2G, or 4G administered once versus twice daily.

RESULTS

The ertapenem MIC ranged from 0.5 to 2 mg/L on three occasions. Ertapenem achieved a half-life of 4.04 ± 0.80 h in the HFS-MAC and killed a maximum of 2.17 log10 CFU/mL below day 0. The EC50 was %TMIC of 75.9% (95% confidence interval: 68.43%-86.54%) and the EC80 was %TMIC of 100%. Target attainment probability was >90% for 1G twice daily up to an MIC of 2 mg/L, while for 2G twice daily the susceptibility MIC breakpoint was 4-8 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Ertapenem microbial kill below day 0 burden was better than guideline-based therapy drugs in the HFS-MAC in the past. Ertapenem is a promising drug for novel combination therapies for MAC lung disease.

In vitro activity of omadacycline against clinical isolates of Nocardia

Nocardiosis typically requires a prolonged treatment duration of ≥6 months and initial combination therapy with 2-3 antibiotics. First-line regimens for nocardiosis are associated with considerable toxicity; therefore, alternative therapies are needed. Omadacycline is an aminomethylcycline with broad antimicrobial activity whose in vitro activity against Nocardia species has not been formally assessed. The in vitro potency of omadacycline was evaluated against 300 Nocardia clinical isolates by broth microdilution. The most common Nocardia species tested were N. cyriacigeorgica (21%), N. nova (20%), and N. farcinica (12%). The most common specimens were respiratory (178 isolates, 59%) and wound (57 isolates, 19%). Omadacycline minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) across all Nocardia species ranged from 0.06 µg/mL to 8 µg/mL, with an MIC50 of 2 µg/mL and MIC90 of 4 µg/mL. The lowest MICs were found among N. paucivorans (MIC50 = 0.25 µg/mL, MIC90 = 0.25 µg/mL), N. asiatica (MIC50 = 0.25 µg/mL, MIC90 = 1 µg/mL), N. abscessus complex (MIC50 = 0.5 µg/mL, MIC90 = 1 µg/mL), N. beijingensis (MIC50 = 0.5 µg/mL, MIC90 = 2 µg/mL), and N. otitidiscaviarum (MIC50 = 1 µg/mL, MIC90 = 2 µg/mL). The highest MICs were found among N. farcinica (MIC50 = 4 µg/mL, MIC90 = 8 µg/mL). In vitro potency differed by species among Nocardia clinical isolates. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the potential clinical utility of omadacycline for nocardiosis.

Omadacycline pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and efficacy against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the hollow fiber system model

Seventy-five years ago, first-generation tetracyclines demonstrated limited efficacy in the treatment of tuberculosis but were more toxic than efficacious. We performed a series of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) experiments with a potentially safer third-generation tetracycline, omadacycline, for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) H37Rv and an MDR-TB clinical strain (16D) were used in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and static concentration-response studies in test tubes, followed by a PK/PD study using the hollow fiber system model of TB (HFS-TB) that examined six human-like omadacycline doses. The inhibitory sigmoid maximal effect (Emax) model and Monte Carlo experiments (MCEs) were used for data analysis and clinical dose-finding, respectively. The omadacycline MIC for both Mtb H37Rv and MDR-TB clinical strain was 16 mg/L but dropped to 4 mg/L with daily drug supplementation to account for omadacycline degradation. The Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube MIC was 2 mg/L. In the test tubes, omadacycline killed 4.39 log10 CFU/mL in 7 days. On Day 28 of the HFS-TB study, the Emax was 4.64 log10 CFU/mL, while exposure mediating 50% of Emax (EC50) was an area under the concentration-time curve to MIC (AUC0-24/MIC) ratio of 22.86. This translates to PK/PD optimal exposure or EC80 as AUC0-24/MIC of 26.93. The target attainment probability of the 300-mg daily oral dose was 90% but fell at MIC ≧4 mg/L. Omadacycline demonstrated efficacy and potency against both drug-susceptible and MDR-TB. Further studies are needed to identify the omadacycline effect in combination therapy for the treatment of both drug-susceptible and MDR-TB.

Sarecycline pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in the hollow-fibre model of Mycobacterium avium complex: so near and yet so far

BACKGROUND

Poor sustained sputum culture conversion rates with the standard-of-care therapy highlight the need for better drugs to treat Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD)-optimized exposure of sarecycline and its potential role in treating MAC-PD.

METHODS

We performed MIC studies with MAC ATCC 700898 and 19 clinical isolates and test-tube static concentration-response studies. A dynamic hollow-fibre system model of intracellular MAC (HFS-MAC) study was performed mimicking six human-equivalent sarecycline dose concentration-time profiles to identify the PK/PD optimal exposure of sarecycline for MAC kill. The inhibitory sigmoid maximal effect (Emax) model was used for PK/PD analysis.

RESULTS

The sarecycline MIC of MAC ATCC 700898 was 1 mg/L, while the MIC for the 19 clinical strains ranged between 32 and >256 mg/L. The concentration mediating 50% of Emax (EC50) was similar between intracellular and extracellular MAC. In the HFS-MAC, all six sarecycline doses killed intracellular MAC, with an Emax of 1.0 log10 cfu/mL below Day 0 burden (stasis). The sarecycline EC80 (optimal) exposure was identified as AUC0-24/MIC = 139.46.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarecycline demonstrated anti-MAC Emax in the HFS-MAC model better than ethambutol but worse than omadacycline (>5 log10 cfu/mL below stasis) in HFS-MAC. However, since currently approved highest oral sarecycline dose achieves an AUC0-24 of 48.2 mg·h/L and MAC MICs are >32 mg/L, the target AUC0-24/MIC of 139.46 is unlikely to be achieved in patients.

Treatment of Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease: When Should I Treat and What Therapy Should I Start?

Treatment of M avium pulmonary disease requires a three-drug, macrolide-based regimen that is administered for 12 months beyond culture conversion. The regimen can be administered 3 days a week in non-cavitary, nodular bronchiectatic disease but should be given daily when cavitary disease is present. For treatment refractory disease, amikacin liposome inhalation suspension is added to the regimen. Parenteral amikacin or streptomycin should be administered in the setting of extensive radiographic involvement or macrolide resistance. Recurrence of disease is common and often due to reinfection. Novel and repurposed agents are being evaluated in clinical trials.

Omadacycline pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in the hollow fiber model and clinical validation of efficacy to treat pulmonary Mycobacterium abscessus disease

BACKGROUND

Guideline-based therapy (GBT) for pulmonary Mycobacterium abscessus (Mab) disease achieves sustained sputum culture conversion (SSCC) rates of 30%; this is reflected by poor efficacy of GBT in the hollow fiber system model of Mab (HFS-Mab), which killed ∼1.22 log10 CFU/mL. This study was performed to determine which clinical dose of omadacycline, a tetracycline antibiotic, should be used in combination therapy to treat pulmonary Mab disease for relapse-free cure.

METHODS

First, omadacycline intrapulmonary concentration-time profiles of seven daily doses were mimicked in the HFS-Mab model and exposures associated with optimal efficacy were identified. Second, 10,000 subject Monte-Carlo simulations were performed to determine whether oral omadacycline 300 mg/day achieved these optimal exposures. Third, a retrospective clinical study on omadacycline vs. primarily tigecycline-based salvage therapy was conducted to assess rates of SSCC and toxicity. Fourth, a single patient was recruited to validate the findings.

RESULTS

Omadacycline efficacy in the HFS-Mab was 2.09 log10 CFU/mL at exposures achieved in >99% of patients on 300 mg/day omadacycline. In the retrospective study of omadacycline 300 mg/day-based combinations vs. comparators, SSCC was achieved in 8/10 vs. 1/9 (P=0.006), symptom improvement in 8/8 vs. 5/9 (P=0.033), toxicity in 0 vs. 9/9 (P<0.001), and therapy discontinuation due to toxicity in 0 vs. 3/9 (P<0.001) cases, respectively. In one prospectively recruited patient, omadacycline 300 mg/day salvage therapy achieved SSCC and symptom-resolution in 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Based on the preclinical and clinical data, omadacycline 300 mg/day in combination regimens could be appropriate for testing in Phase III trials in patients with Mab pulmonary disease.

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities of Tigecycline, Eravacycline, Omadacycline, and Sarecycline against Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria

Infections caused by rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) have increased globally. Chemotherapy against these infections is challenging due to the minimal antimicrobial choices available. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro susceptibilities of four tetracyclines against different RGM species. The MICs of eravacycline (ERC), omadacycline (OMC), sarecycline (SAC), and tigecycline (TGC) against the reference strains of 27 RGM species and 121 RGM clinical isolates were determined by microtiter plate assay. The minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) and cytotoxicities of these antibiotics were also tested. Except for SAC, the other three tetracyclines had MICs of ≤0.5 μg/mL against all 27 RGM reference strains. ERC generally presented the lowest MICs, with MIC₉₀s against the clinical isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus, Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense, and Mycobacterium fortuitum of 0.25 μg/mL, 0.25 μg/mL, and 0.06 μg/mL, respectively. TGC and OMC also showed equivalent in vitro inhibitory activities against the isolates, while the TGC MIC₉₀s for M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, M. abscessus subsp. massiliense, and M. fortuitum were lower than or equal to the OMC MIC₉₀s (1, 1, and 0.25 μg/mL versus 1, 2, and 2 μg/mL). In addition, the MIC₅₀s of three of the antibiotics for each species were always 2-fold lower than the corresponding MIC₉₀s. MBC and cytotoxicity assays indicated that all four tetracycline antibiotics tested were bacteriostatic agents with low toxicity to the THP-1 cell line. Tetracycline antibiotics are efficacious in RGM infection treatment, with omadacycline showing the best promise for clinical application due to its potent antimicrobial activity, safety, and convenient administration route. IMPORTANCE The global rise in antibiotic-resistant nontuberculous mycobacteria has prompted the urgent need for new antimicrobials, especially oral antibiotics. Currently, adverse effects have limited the use of tetracycline-class antibiotics, particularly tigecycline (TGC), in the treatment of rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM). However, several new tetracycline-class antibiotics might overcome the limitations of TGC. We assessed the in vitro antibiotic susceptibilities of four tetracyclines (eravacycline, omadacycline, sarecycline, and tigecycline) against reference RGM strains and clinical isolates of different RGM species. We showed that three of these antibiotics (tigecycline, eravacycline, and omadacycline) might be efficacious in M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, M. abscessus subsp. massiliense, and M. fortuitum treatment. Furthermore, omadacycline was more promising for clinical application for M. abscessus infections as an oral drug, whereas sarecycline, which had the best safety parameters, should be considered a potential antibiotic for M. abscessus infections caused by susceptible strains. Our work underscores the possible clinical applications of tetracycline-class antibiotics in the treatment of RGM infections.

Challenges and a potential solution to perform drug susceptibility testing of omadacycline against nontuberculous mycobacteria

BACKGROUND

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of slow growing mycobacteria (SGM) often do not correlate with the treatment response. Among the challenges is the identification of MIC of drugs that degrade in solution faster than the doubling time of the SGM.

METHODS

First, we identified the rate of omadacycline degradation in solution, and its effect on the rapidly growing methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We then identified doubling times versus MICs for Mycobacterium abscessus, M. avium, and M. kansasii, with and without supplementation for degraded drug.

RESULTS

Omadacycline concentration in solution declined ∼50% over 24hr. In the MRSA experiments, omadacycline demonstrated 66.48 ± 19.38% loss in potency over 24hr, confirming the degradation rate in solution. M. abscessus had a doubling time of 8.75 ± 1.23hr and the omadacycline MIC after 24hr of incubation was 2mg/L with and without 50% daily drug supplementation, indicating that drug degradation had no effect on this rapid grower. The doubling time for M. avium was 29.52hr (95% confidence interval (CI): 23.18-33.89hr) and 31.15hr (95%CI: 19.45-38.49 hr) for M. kansasii. The M. avium MICs ±50% daily omadacycline supplementation were 1mg/L and 0.5mg/L on day 7, whereas the M. kansasii MICs ±50% daily supplementation were >128mg/L and 32mg/L on day 7.

CONCLUSION

Omadacycline degradation in solution leads to falsely high MICs when SGM doubling time exceed the drug degradation rates in solution. The challenge could be overcome by daily drug supplementation to account for the loss of potency, which is laborious, or perhaps stabilizing the drug from degradation.

Omadacycline Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics in the Hollow Fiber System Model and Potential Combination Regimen for Short Course Treatment of Mycobacterium kansasii Pulmonary Disease

The 12-month therapy duration for the treatment of Mycobacterium kansasii pulmonary disease calls for more efficacious drugs for better treatment outcomes and to shorten the therapy duration. We performed (i) omadacycline MIC with M. kansasii ATCC 12478 strain and 21 clinical isolates, (ii) dose-response study in the hollow fiber system model of M. kansasii (HFS-Mkn) with six human equivalent omadacycline daily doses to determine the optimal drug exposure for the maximal kill, and (iii) a second HFS-Mkn study to determine the efficacy of omadacycline (300 mg/day) plus moxifloxacin (600 mg/day) plus tedizolid (200 mg/day) combination regimen with standard regimen as comparator. GraphPad Prism was used for data analysis and graphing. MIC of the reference strain was 4 mg/L but ranged from 8 to 32 mg/L among the 21 clinical isolates. In the HFS-Mkn, the exposure required for 50% of the maximal effect (EC₅₀) was an omadacycline area under the concentration-time curve to MIC (AUC_0-24/MIC) ratio of 1.95. The optimal exposure was an AUC_0-24/MIC of 3.05, which could be achieved with 300 mg/day clinical dose. The omadacycline-moxifloxacin-tedizolid combination sterilized the HFS-Mkn in 14 days with a linear-regression based kill rate of -0.309 ± 0.044 log₁₀ CFU/mL/day compared to the kill rate of -0.084 ± 0.036log₁₀ CFU/mL/day with the standard regimen or 3.7-times faster. Omadacycline has efficacy against M. kansasii and could be used at 300 mg/day in combination with moxifloxacin and tedizolid for the treatment of M. kansasii pulmonary diseases with the potential to shorten the currently recommended 12-month therapy duration.