1
|
Pedersen OS, Holmgaard FB, Mikkelsen MKD, Lange C, Sotgiu G, Lillebaek T, Andersen AB, Wejse CM, Dahl VN. Global treatment outcomes of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect 2023; 87:177-189. [PMID: 37356629 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Historically, extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis has been notoriously difficult to treat with devasting outcomes. As we are coming to the end of an era where the 2006 extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis definitions and old treatment regimens are being replaced, we aimed to estimate the proportion of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis patients globally who achieved successful treatment outcomes. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase from January 1, 2005, through April 3, 2023. Included studies reported WHO treatment outcomes, or adaptions hereof, for pre-extensively and/or extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis patients according to the 2006 WHO definition. Eligible studies included cohorts of at least 10 adults (aged>18 years) that were not pregnant. Using a random-effects model, we calculated pooled proportions of treatment outcomes and performed sensitivity and subgroup analyses. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022340961. RESULTS Among 5056 studies reviewed, we identified 94 studies from 26 countries, involving 10,223 extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis patients. The pooled proportion of successful treatment outcomes was 44.2% (95%CI: 38.3-50.3). Sensitivity analyses consistently produced similar estimates. A slight improvement in treatment outcomes was observed after 2013. Furthermore, 25 studies reported outcomes for 3564 individuals with pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, of which 63.3% achieved successful treatment (95%CI: 43.1-72.5). CONCLUSION Globally, the success rate of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment is 44.2%, far below the WHO's target rate of 75%. These results may serve as a reference for future studies assessing extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment outcomes under the 2021 definition treated with better treatment regimens available. Comprehensive surveillance data of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis outcomes from the whole world are desirable to monitor treatment progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ole Skouvig Pedersen
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Christoph Lange
- Division of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Research Center Borstel, Borstel, Germany; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, Borstel, Germany; Respiratory Medicine and International Health, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children´s Hospital, Global TB Program, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Giovanni Sotgiu
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Troels Lillebaek
- Global Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; International Reference Laboratory of Mycobacteriology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Christian Morberg Wejse
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Center for Global Health, Aarhus University (GloHAU), Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Victor Naestholt Dahl
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; International Reference Laboratory of Mycobacteriology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark; Center for Global Health, Aarhus University (GloHAU), Aarhus, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mase A, Lowenthal P, True L, Henry L, Barry P, Flood J. Low-Dose Linezolid for Treatment of Patients With Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac500. [PMID: 36601556 PMCID: PMC9801093 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Linezolid has been prioritized for treating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB), but toxicity limits its use. We report treatment outcomes for MDR TB patients in California who received standard-dose linezolid vs those who switched to low-dose. Methods We include culture-positive MDR TB cases treated with linezolid and receiving California MDR TB Service consultation during 2009-2016. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data are analyzed using univariate analysis to compare patients who received linezolid of different dosing strategies. Analysis end points are linezolid treatment duration (measure of tolerability), treatment success (completion or cure), and adverse events (AEs). Results Sixty-nine of 194 (36%) MDR TB patients met inclusion criteria. While all patients began linezolid treatment at 600 mg daily, 39 (57%) continued at this dosage (standard-dose), and 30 (43%) switched to 300 mg daily (29%) or intermittent dosing (14%) (low dose). Patients on standard-dose linezolid were treated for 240 days, compared with 535 for those on low-dose (P < .0001). Sixty-three patients (91%) achieved treatment success, 2 (2.9%) died, 1 (1.5%) failed treatment, 1 (1.5%) stopped treatment due to side effects, and 2 (2.9%) were lost or moved. Treatment success was higher (P = .03) in the low-dose group. Sixty-two patients experienced ≥1 hematologic (71%) or neurologic (65%) AE. Those on low-dose linezolid experienced significantly (P = .03) fewer AEs per linezolid-month after switching (0.32 vs 0.10). Conclusions Patients who switched to low dose tolerated linezolid longer with better treatment outcomes and fewer recurring AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjeli Mase
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Phil Lowenthal
- California Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Control Branch, Richmond, California, USA
| | - Lisa True
- California Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Control Branch, Richmond, California, USA
| | - Leslie Henry
- California Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Control Branch, Richmond, California, USA
| | - Pennan Barry
- California Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Control Branch, Richmond, California, USA
| | - Jennifer Flood
- Correspondence: Jennifer Flood, MD, MPH, California Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Control Branch, 850 Marina Bay Parkway, Building P, Floor 2, Richmond, CA 94804 ()
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tang Q, Ke H, Sun WW, Zhang SJ, Fan L. The Correlations of Minimal Inhibitory Concentration Values of Anti-TB Drugs with Treatment Outcomes and Clinical Profiles in Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in China. Infect Drug Resist 2022; 15:5275-5287. [PMID: 36106053 PMCID: PMC9464630 DOI: 10.2147/idr.s374687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective It is a challenge to obtain satisfactory treatment outcomes for patients with multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB); the study aims to correlate the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) value of drugs with the outcome of patients with MDR/RR-TB to obtain an understanding for better regimens and optimal outcomes. Methods The patients diagnosed with MDR/RR-TB were retrospectively enrolled from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019, recorded clinical characteristics, MIC DST (Drug Susceptibility Test) results, and followed the treatment outcome. The data were analyzed on the correlations of MIC DST values with outcomes and clinical characteristics. Results A total of 276 patients with MDR/RR-TB were included, containing 98 cases (35.5%) with newly treated patients and 178 cases (64.5%) with re-treated patients. A total of 220 cases recorded treatment success (79.7%) and 49 cases recorded treatment failure or died. MIC values of isoniazid (H), moxifloxacin (Mfx), and ethionamide (Eto) in newly treated patients were lower than those in retreated patients, and resistance levels of Mfx and H were closely associated with the treatment outcome (P < 0.05) while those of other drugs had no close association with treatment outcome. Conclusions MIC values of some anti-TB drugs, such as fluoroquinolones (FQs) and H, can reflect the treatment outcome for patients with MDR/RR-TB, which can contribute to making regimens for better treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qin Tang
- Department of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Tuberculosis, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Tuberculosis, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China
| | - Hui Ke
- Department of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Tuberculosis, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Tuberculosis, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China
| | - Wen-Wen Sun
- Department of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Tuberculosis, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Tuberculosis, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China
| | - Shao-Jun Zhang
- Department of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Tuberculosis, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Tuberculosis, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China
| | - Lin Fan
- Department of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Tuberculosis, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Tuberculosis, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kokebu DM, Ahmed S, Moodliar R, Chiang CY, Torrea G, Van Deun A, Goodall RL, Rusen ID, Meredith SK, Nunn AJ. Failure or relapse predictors for the STREAM Stage 1 short regimen for RR-TB. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2022; 26:753-759. [PMID: 35898125 PMCID: PMC9341498 DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.22.0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: STREAM (Standardised Treatment Regimens of Anti-tuberculosis drugs for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis) Stage 1 demonstrated non-inferior efficacy of a short regimen for rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) compared to a long regimen as recommended by the WHO. The present paper analyses factors associated with a definite or probable failure or relapse (FoR) event in participants receiving the Short regimen.METHODS: This analysis is restricted to 253 participants allocated to the Short regimen and is based on the protocol-defined modified intention to treat (mITT) population. Multivariable Cox regression models were built using backwards elimination with an exit probability of P = 0.157, equivalent to the Akaike Information Criterion, to identify factors independently associated with a definite or probable FoR event.RESULTS: Four baseline factors were identified as being significantly associated with the risk of definite or probable FoR (male sex, a heavily positive baseline smear grade, HIV co-infection and the presence of costophrenic obliteration). There was evidence of association of culture positivity at Week 8 and FoR in a second model and Week 16 smear positivity, presence of diabetes and of smoking in a third model.CONCLUSION: The factors associated with FoR outcomes identified in this analysis should be considered when determining the optimal shortened treatment regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. M. Kokebu
- St Peter’s Tuberculosis Specialised Hospital/Global Health Committee, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - S. Ahmed
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - R. Moodliar
- Tuberculosis & HIV Investigative Network (THINK), Doris Goodwin Hospital, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
| | - C-Y. Chiang
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wanfang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France
| | - G. Torrea
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - A. Van Deun
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - R. L. Goodall
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - I. D. Rusen
- Research Division, Vital Strategies, New York, USA
| | - S. K. Meredith
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - A. J. Nunn
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Uddin MKM, Ather MF, Nasrin R, Rahman T, Islam ASMI, Rahman SMM, Ahmed S, Banu S. Correlation of gyr Mutations with the Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations of Fluoroquinolones among Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates in Bangladesh. Pathogens 2021; 10:1422. [PMID: 34832578 PMCID: PMC8623510 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10111422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Fluoroquinolone (FQ) compounds-moxifloxacin (MOX), levofloxacin (LEV), and ofloxacin (OFL)-are used to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) globally. In this study, we investigated the correlation of gyr mutations among Mtb isolates with the MICs of MOX, LEV, and OFL in Bangladesh. A total of 50 MDR-TB isolates with gyr mutations, detected by the GenoType MTBDRsl assay, were subjected to drug susceptibility testing to determine the MICs of the FQs. Spoligotyping was performed to correlate the genetic diversity of the gyr mutant isolates with different MIC distributions. Among the 50 isolates, 44 (88%) had mutations in the gyrA gene, one (2%) had a mutation in the gyrB gene, and five (10%) isolates had unidentified mutations. The substitutions in the gyrA region were at A90V (n = 19, 38%), D94G (n = 16, 32%), D94A (n = 4, 8%), D94N/D94Y (n = 4, 8%), and S91P (n = 1, 2%), compared to the gyrB gene at N538D (n = 1.2%). D94G mutations showed the highest MICs for MOX, LEV, and OFL, ranging between 4.0 and 8.0 μg/mL, 4.0 and 16.0 μg/mL, and 16.0 and 32.0 μg/mL, respectively; while the most common substitution of A90V showed the lowest ranges of MICs (1.0-4.0 μg/mL, 2.0-8.0 μg/mL, and 4.0-32.0 μg/mL, respectively). Spoligotyping lineages demonstrated no significant differences regarding the prevalence of different gyr mutations. In conclusion, the substitutions of codon A90V and D94G in the gyr genes were mostly responsible for the FQs' resistance among Mtb isolates in Bangladesh. Low levels of resistance were associated with the substitutions of A90V, while the D94G substitutions were associated with a high level of resistance to all FQs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sayera Banu
- Infectious Diseases Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh; (M.K.M.U.); (M.F.A.); (R.N.); (T.R.); (A.S.M.I.I.); (S.M.M.R.); (S.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yu S, Sohn H, Kim HY, Kim H, Oh KH, Kim HJ, Chung H, Choi H. Evaluating the impact of the nationwide public-private mix (PPM) program for tuberculosis under National Health Insurance in South Korea: A difference in differences analysis. PLoS Med 2021; 18:e1003717. [PMID: 34260579 PMCID: PMC8318235 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2019] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public-private mix (PPM) programs on tuberculosis (TB) have a critical role in engaging and integrating the private sector into the national TB control efforts in order to meet the End TB Strategy targets. South Korea's PPM program can provide important insights on the long-term impact and policy gaps in the development and expansion of PPM as a nationwide program. METHODS AND FINDINGS Healthcare is privatized in South Korea, and a majority (80.3% in 2009) of TB patients sought care in the private sector. Since 2009, South Korea has rapidly expanded its PPM program coverage under the National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme as a formal national program with dedicated PPM nurses managing TB patients in both the private and public sectors. Using the difference in differences (DID) analytic framework, we compared relative changes in TB treatment outcomes-treatment success (TS) and loss to follow-up (LTFU)-in the private and public sector between the 2009 and 2014 TB patient cohorts. Propensity score matching (PSM) using the kernel method was done to adjust for imbalances in the covariates between the 2 population cohorts. The 2009 cohort included 6,195 (63.0% male, 37.0% female; mean age: 42.1) and 27,396 (56.1% male, 43.9% female; mean age: 45.7) TB patients in the public and private sectors, respectively. The 2014 cohort included 2,803 (63.2% male, 36.8% female; mean age: 50.1) and 29,988 (56.5% male, 43.5% female; mean age: 54.7) patients. In both the private and public sectors, the proportion of patients with transfer history decreased (public: 23.8% to 21.7% and private: 20.8% to 17.6%), and bacteriological confirmed disease increased (public: 48.9% to 62.3% and private: 48.8% to 58.1%) in 2014 compared to 2009. After expanding nationwide PPM, absolute TS rates improved by 9.10% (87.5% to 93.4%) and by 13.6% (from 70.3% to 83.9%) in the public and private sectors. Relative to the public, the private saw 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9% to 5.3%, p-value < 0.001) and -8.7% (95% CI -9.7% to -7.7%, p-value <0.001) higher rates of improvement in TS and reduction in LTFU. Treatment outcomes did not improve in patients who experienced at least 1 transfer during their TB treatment. Study limitations include non-longitudinal nature of our original dataset, inability to assess the regional disparities, and verify PPM program's impact on TB mortality. CONCLUSIONS We found that the nationwide scale-up of the PPM program was associated with improvements in TB treatment outcomes in the private sector in South Korea. Centralized financial governance and regulatory mechanisms were integral in facilitating the integration of highly diverse South Korean private sector into the national TB control program and scaling up of the PPM intervention nationwide. However, TB care gaps continued to exist for patients who transferred at least once during their treatment. These programmatic gaps may be improved through reducing administrative hurdles and making programmatic amendments that can help facilitate management TB patients between institutions and healthcare sectors, as well as across administrative regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Yu
- Korean Institute of Tuberculosis, Korean National Tuberculosis Association, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
- School of Health Policy & Management, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- BK21 FOUR R&E Center for Learning Health Systems, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hojoon Sohn
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Hae-Young Kim
- School of Health Policy & Management, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- BK21 FOUR R&E Center for Learning Health Systems, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyunwoo Kim
- Korean Institute of Tuberculosis, Korean National Tuberculosis Association, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kyung-Hyun Oh
- Korean Institute of Tuberculosis, Korean National Tuberculosis Association, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
- End TB and Leprosy Unit, World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines
| | - Hee-Jin Kim
- Korean Institute of Tuberculosis, Korean National Tuberculosis Association, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
| | - Haejoo Chung
- School of Health Policy & Management, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- BK21 FOUR R&E Center for Learning Health Systems, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hongjo Choi
- Korean Institute of Tuberculosis, Korean National Tuberculosis Association, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shi W, Davies Forsman L, Hu Y, Zheng X, Gao Y, Li X, Jiang W, Bruchfeld J, Diwan VK, Hoffner S, Xu B. Improved treatment outcome of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis with the use of a rapid molecular test to detect drug resistance in China. Int J Infect Dis 2020; 96:390-397. [PMID: 32353546 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Numerous studies investigate the advantages of rapid molecular drug susceptibility testing (DST) in comparison to phenotypic DST, but the clinical impact on treating multi/extensively drug resistant TB(M/XDR-TB) is less studied. Therefore, we examined how molecular DST testing may improve MDR-TB treatment management and outcome in Chinese settings. METHODS We performed a comparative study of patient cohorts before and after the implementation of molecular DST diagnosis with Genotype MTBDRsl/MTBDRplus assay in two Chinese hospitals. We collected clinical information including time to sputum culture conversion and final treatment outcome. RESULTS In total, 242 MDR-TB patients were studied including 114 before (pre-implementation group) and 128 after the implementation (post-implementation group) of molecular DST. Time to MDR-TB diagnosis was significantly reduced for patients in the post-implementation group, as compared to the pre-implementation group (median,16 vs 62 days; P < 0.001). Patients with early available molecular DST results had a more rapid culture conversion (aHR1.94 95% CI: 1.37-2.73; median,12 vs 24 months, respectively; P < 0.001) and higher rate of treatment success (68% vs 47%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The use of molecular DST in routine care for MDR-TB diagnosis as compared to phenotypic DST was associated with a decreased time to culture conversion and improved treatment outcome, highlighting its important clinical value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenpei Shi
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Ministry of Education), Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lina Davies Forsman
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yi Hu
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Ministry of Education), Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Xubin Zheng
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Ministry of Education), Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yazhou Gao
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Ministry of Education), Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xuliang Li
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Ministry of Education), Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weili Jiang
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Ministry of Education), Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Judith Bruchfeld
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Vinod K Diwan
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sven Hoffner
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Biao Xu
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Ministry of Education), Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kang H, Jo KW, Jeon D, Yim JJ, Shim TS. Interim treatment outcomes in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis using bedaquiline and/or delamanid in South Korea. Respir Med 2020; 167:105956. [PMID: 32421540 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.105956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention has implemented a review process for the approval of new drugs used to treat patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) since September 2016. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these new drugs bedaquiline (Bdq) and delamanid (Dlm). METHODS A total of 318 patients with MDR-TB were reviewed by the committee from September 2016 to February 2018; 282 (88.7%) of them were treated with the new drugs (Bdq, 107 patients; Dlm, 108 patients; and both concurrently or sequentially, 67 patients) and retrospectively evaluated. Culture conversion rates, interim treatment outcomes at 12 months, and predictors of unfavorable outcomes were analyzed. Treatment efficacy was also compared between Bdq and Dlm. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 49.3 years, and 197 (69.9%) were male. Three patients were HIV seropositive and 151 (53.5%) were quinolone resistant. The culture conversion rates at 2 and 6 months were 57.4% (81/141) and 89.4% (126/141), respectively. A favorable outcome at 12 months was achieved in 84.8% of patients (239/282). Differences in the culture conversion rate or interim treatment outcomes were not statistically significant among the drug susceptibility test patterns or new drugs used. Multivariable analysis showed that age >60 years and body mass index of <18.5 kg/m2 were significant risk factors for unfavorable outcomes at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS The use of new drugs resulted in satisfactory interim treatment results, without significant differences between them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyungseok Kang
- Department of Chest Medicine, Masan National Tuberculosis Hospital, Masan, South Korea
| | - Kyung-Wook Jo
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Doosoo Jeon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea
| | - Jae-Joon Yim
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Tae Sun Shim
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lan Z, Ahmad N, Baghaei P, Barkane L, Benedetti A, Brode SK, Brust JCM, Campbell JR, Chang VWL, Falzon D, Guglielmetti L, Isaakidis P, Kempker RR, Kipiani M, Kuksa L, Lange C, Laniado-Laborín R, Nahid P, Rodrigues D, Singla R, Udwadia ZF, Menzies D. Drug-associated adverse events in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2020; 8:383-394. [PMID: 32192585 PMCID: PMC7384398 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30047-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis requires long-term therapy with a combination of multiple second-line drugs. These drugs are associated with numerous adverse events that can cause severe morbidity, such as deafness, and in some instances can lead to death. Our aim was to estimate the absolute and relative frequency of adverse events associated with different tuberculosis drugs to provide useful information for clinicians and tuberculosis programmes in selecting optimal treatment regimens. METHODS We did a meta-analysis using individual-level patient data that were obtained from studies that reported adverse events that resulted in permanent discontinuation of anti-tuberculosis medications. We used a database created for our previous meta-analysis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment and outcomes, for which we did a systematic review of literature published between Jan 1, 2009, and Aug 31, 2015 (updated April 15, 2016), and requested individual patient-level information from authors. We also considered for this analysis studies contributing patient-level data in response to a public call made by WHO in 2018. Meta-analysis for proportions and arm-based network meta-analysis were done to estimate the incidence of adverse events for each tuberculosis drug. FINDINGS 58 studies were identified, including 50 studies from the updated individual patient data meta-analysis for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment. 35 of these studies, with 9178 patients, were included in our analysis. Using meta-analysis of proportions, drugs with low risks of adverse event occurrence leading to permanent discontinuation included levofloxacin (1·3% [95% CI 0·3-5·0]), moxifloxacin (2·9% [1·6-5·0]), bedaquiline (1·7% [0·7-4·2]), and clofazimine (1·6% [0·5-5·3]). Relatively high incidence of adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation was seen with three second-line injectable drugs (amikacin: 10·2% [6·3-16·0]; kanamycin: 7·5% [4·6-11·9]; capreomycin: 8·2% [6·3-10·7]), aminosalicylic acid (11·6% [7·1-18·3]), and linezolid (14·1% [9·9-19·6]). Risk of bias in selection of studies was judged to be low because there were no important differences between included and excluded studies. Variability between studies was significant for most outcomes analysed. INTERPRETATION Fluoroquinolones, clofazimine, and bedaquiline had the lowest incidence of adverse events leading to permanent drug discontinuation, whereas second-line injectable drugs, aminosalicylic acid, and linezolid had the highest incidence. These results suggest that close monitoring of adverse events is important for patients being treated for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Our results also underscore the urgent need for safer and better-tolerated drugs to reduce morbidity from treatment itself for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. FUNDING Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA), American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, and Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyi Lan
- Montreal Chest Institute, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nafees Ahmad
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of Baluchistan, Quetta, Pakistan
| | - Parvaneh Baghaei
- Clinical Tuberculosis and Epidemiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Linda Barkane
- Riga East University Hospital for TB and Lung Disease Centre, Riga, Latvia
| | - Andrea Benedetti
- Montreal Chest Institute, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sarah K Brode
- Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; West Park Healthcare Centre, University Health Network, and Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - James C M Brust
- Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathon R Campbell
- Montreal Chest Institute, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Vicky Wai Lai Chang
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, The Sutherland Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Dennis Falzon
- Global TB Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lorenzo Guglielmetti
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène, Centre National de Référence des Mycobactéries et de la Résistance des Mycobactéries aux Antituberculeux, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Paris, France; Sorbonne Universités, Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses (CIMI; INSERM U1135/UMRS CR7/CNRS ERL 8255), Team E13 (Bactériologie), Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, (UPMC; Université Paris 6), Paris, France; Sanatorium, Centre Hospitalier de Bligny, Briis-sous-Forges, France
| | | | - Russell R Kempker
- Emory University School of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Maia Kipiani
- National Center for Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Liga Kuksa
- Riga East University Hospital for TB and Lung Disease Centre, Riga, Latvia
| | - Christoph Lange
- Divisions of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Research Center Borstel, Borstel, Germany; German Center for Infection Research, Clinical Tuberculosis Unit, Borstel, Germany; International Health/Infectious Diseases, University of Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany; Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Payam Nahid
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Rupak Singla
- National Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, Sri Aurobindo Marg, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Dick Menzies
- Montreal Chest Institute, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abidi S, Achar J, Assao Neino MM, Bang D, Benedetti A, Brode S, Campbell JR, Casas EC, Conradie F, Dravniece G, du Cros P, Falzon D, Jaramillo E, Kuaban C, Lan Z, Lange C, Li PZ, Makhmudova M, Maug AKJ, Menzies D, Migliori GB, Miller A, Myrzaliev B, Ndjeka N, Noeske J, Parpieva N, Piubello A, Schwoebel V, Sikhondze W, Singla R, Souleymane MB, Trébucq A, Van Deun A, Viney K, Weyer K, Zhang BJ, Ahmad Khan F. Standardised shorter regimens versus individualised longer regimens for rifampin- or multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Eur Respir J 2020; 55:13993003.01467-2019. [PMID: 31862767 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01467-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
We sought to compare the effectiveness of two World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended regimens for the treatment of rifampin- or multidrug-resistant (RR/MDR) tuberculosis (TB): a standardised regimen of 9-12 months (the "shorter regimen") and individualised regimens of ≥20 months ("longer regimens").We collected individual patient data from observational studies identified through systematic reviews and a public call for data. We included patients meeting WHO eligibility criteria for the shorter regimen: not previously treated with second-line drugs, and with fluoroquinolone- and second-line injectable agent-susceptible RR/MDR-TB. We used propensity score matched, mixed effects meta-regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios and adjusted risk differences (aRDs) for failure or relapse, death within 12 months of treatment initiation and loss to follow-up.We included 2625 out of 3378 (77.7%) individuals from nine studies of shorter regimens and 2717 out of 13 104 (20.7%) individuals from 53 studies of longer regimens. Treatment success was higher with the shorter regimen than with longer regimens (pooled proportions 80.0% versus 75.3%), due to less loss to follow-up with the former (aRD -0.15, 95% CI -0.17- -0.12). The risk difference for failure or relapse was slightly higher with the shorter regimen overall (aRD 0.02, 95% CI 0-0.05) and greater in magnitude with baseline resistance to pyrazinamide (aRD 0.12, 95% CI 0.07-0.16), prothionamide/ethionamide (aRD 0.07, 95% CI -0.01-0.16) or ethambutol (aRD 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.13).In patients meeting WHO criteria for its use, the standardised shorter regimen was associated with substantially less loss to follow-up during treatment compared with individualised longer regimens and with more failure or relapse in the presence of resistance to component medications. Our findings support the need to improve access to reliable drug susceptibility testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Abidi
- McGill International TB Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, McGill University and Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jay Achar
- Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors without Borders, London, UK
| | | | - Didi Bang
- International Reference Laboratory of Mycobacteriology, National Centre for Antimicrobials and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andrea Benedetti
- McGill International TB Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, McGill University and Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Dept of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sarah Brode
- West Park Healthcare Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathon R Campbell
- McGill International TB Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, McGill University and Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Esther C Casas
- Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors without Borders, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesca Conradie
- Dept of Medicine, University of Witswatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Philipp du Cros
- Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors without Borders, London, UK.,Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Christopher Kuaban
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Bamenda, Bambili, Cameroon
| | - Zhiyi Lan
- McGill International TB Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, McGill University and Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Christoph Lange
- Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Lung Center, Borstel, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research Clinical TB Unit, Borstel, Germany.,Respiratory Medicine and International Health, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,Dept of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pei Zhi Li
- Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, McGill University and Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Dick Menzies
- McGill International TB Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, McGill University and Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Giovanni Battista Migliori
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Tradate, Italy
| | - Ann Miller
- Dept of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bakyt Myrzaliev
- KNCV TB Foundation, Branch Office KNCV in Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
| | - Norbert Ndjeka
- National TB Programme, Republic of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
| | | | | | - Alberto Piubello
- Damien Foundation, Brussels, Belgium.,International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France
| | - Valérie Schwoebel
- International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France
| | - Welile Sikhondze
- National TB Control Program, Eswatini Ministry of Health, Mbabane, Swaziland
| | - Rupak Singla
- National Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, Delhi, India
| | | | - Arnaud Trébucq
- International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France
| | - Armand Van Deun
- Mycobacteriology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kerri Viney
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Karin Weyer
- World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Betty Jingxuan Zhang
- McGill International TB Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, McGill University and Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Faiz Ahmad Khan
- McGill International TB Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada .,Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, McGill University and Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Linezolid was recently re-classified as a Group A drug by the World Health Organization (WHO) for treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB), suggesting that it should be included in the regimen for all patients unless contraindicated. Linezolid use carries a considerable risk of toxicity, with the optimal dose and duration remaining unclear. Current guidelines are mainly based on evidence from observational non-comparative studies. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy of linezolid when used as part of a second-line regimen for treating people with MDR and XDR pulmonary tuberculosis, and to assess the prevalence and severity of adverse events associated with linezolid use in this patient group. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Specialized Register; CENTRAL; MEDLINE; Embase; and LILACS up to 13 July 2018. We also checked article reference lists and contacted researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies in which some participants received linezolid, and others did not. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of linezolid for MDR and XDR pulmonary tuberculosis to evaluate efficacy outcomes. We added non-randomized cohort studies to evaluate adverse events.Primary outcomes were all-cause and tuberculosis-associated death, treatment failure, and cure. Secondary outcomes were treatment interrupted, treatment completed, and time to sputum culture conversion. We recorded frequency of all and serious adverse events, adverse events leading to drug discontinuation or dose reduction, and adverse events attributed to linezolid, particularly neuropathy, anaemia, and thrombocytopenia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors (BS and DC) independently assessed the search results for eligibility and extracted data from included studies. All review authors assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool for RCTs and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. We contacted study authors for clarification and additional data when necessary.We were unable to perform a meta-analysis as one of the RCTs adopted a study design where participants in the study group received linezolid immediately and participants in the control group received linezolid after two months, and therefore there were no comparable data from this trial. We deemed meta-analysis of non-randomized study data inappropriate. MAIN RESULTS We identified three RCTs for inclusion. One of these studies had serious problems with allocation of the study drug and placebo, so we could not analyse data for intervention effect from it. The remaining two RCTs recruited 104 participants. One randomized 65 participants to receive linezolid or not, in addition to a background regimen; the other randomized 39 participants to addition of linezolid to a background regimen immediately, or after a delay of two months. We included 14 non-randomized cohort studies (two prospective, 12 retrospective), with a total of 1678 participants.Settings varied in terms of income and tuberculosis burden. One RCT and 7 out of 14 non-randomized studies commenced recruitment in or after 2009. All RCT participants and 38.7% of non-randomized participants were reported to have XDR-TB.Dosing and duration of linezolid in studies were variable and reported inconsistently. Daily doses ranged from 300 mg to 1200 mg; some studies had planned dose reduction for all participants after a set time, others had incompletely reported dose reductions for some participants, and most did not report numbers of participants receiving each dose. Mean or median duration of linezolid therapy was longer than 90 days in eight of the 14 non-randomized cohorts that reported this information.Duration of participant follow-up varied between RCTs. Only five out of 14 non-randomized studies reported follow-up duration.Both RCTs were at low risk of reporting bias and unclear risk of selection bias. One RCT was at high risk of performance and detection bias, and low risk for attrition bias, for all outcomes. The other RCT was at low risk of detection and attrition bias for the primary outcome, with unclear risk of detection and attrition bias for non-primary outcomes, and unclear risk of performance bias for all outcomes. Overall risk of bias for the non-randomized studies was critical for three studies, and serious for the remaining 11.One RCT reported higher cure (risk ratio (RR) 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13 to 4.90, very low-certainty evidence), lower failure (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.70, very low-certainty evidence), and higher sputum culture conversion at 24 months (RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.30 to 3.40, very low-certainty evidence), amongst the linezolid-treated group than controls, with no differences in other primary and secondary outcomes. This study also found more anaemia (17/33 versus 2/32), nausea and vomiting, and neuropathy (14/33 versus 1/32) events amongst linezolid-receiving participants. Linezolid was discontinued early and permanently in two of 33 (6.1%) participants who received it.The other RCT reported higher sputum culture conversion four months after randomization (RR 2.26, 95% CI 1.19 to 4.28), amongst the group who received linezolid immediately compared to the group who had linezolid initiation delayed by two months. Linezolid was discontinued early and permanently in seven of 39 (17.9%) participants who received it.Linezolid discontinuation occurred in 22.6% (141/624; 11 studies), of participants in the non-randomized studies. Total, serious, and linezolid-attributed adverse events could not be summarized quantitatively or comparatively, due to incompleteness of data on duration of follow-up and numbers of participants experiencing events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found some evidence of efficacy of linezolid for drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis from RCTs in participants with XDR-TB but adverse events and discontinuation of linezolid were common. Overall, there is a lack of comparative data on efficacy and safety. Serious risk of bias and heterogeneity in conducting and reporting non-randomized studies makes the existing, mostly retrospective, data difficult to interpret. Further prospective cohort studies or RCTs in high tuberculosis burden low-income and lower-middle-income countries would be useful to inform policymakers and clinicians of the efficacy and safety of linezolid as a component of drug-resistant TB treatment regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhagteshwar Singh
- Royal Liverpool University HospitalTropical and Infectious Diseases UnitLiverpoolUK
- University of LiverpoolInstitute of Infection & Global HealthLiverpoolUK
- Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineDepartment of Clinical SciencesLiverpoolUK
| | - Derek Cocker
- Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineDepartment of Clinical SciencesLiverpoolUK
- Northwick Park HospitalWatford RoadHarrowMiddlesexUKHA1 3UJ
| | - Hannah Ryan
- Royal Liverpool University HospitalTropical and Infectious Diseases UnitLiverpoolUK
- Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineDepartment of Clinical SciencesLiverpoolUK
| | - Derek J Sloan
- Liverpool School of Tropical MedicineDepartment of Clinical SciencesLiverpoolUK
- University of St AndrewsSchool of MedicineNorth HaughSt AndrewsUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim H, Mok JH, Kang B, Lee T, Lee HK, Jang HJ, Cho YJ, Jeon D. Trend of multidrug and fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from 2010 to 2014 in Korea: a multicenter study. Korean J Intern Med 2019; 34:344-352. [PMID: 30045614 PMCID: PMC6406095 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2018.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS This study was conducted to evaluate the recent prevalence and trend of anti-tuberculosis (TB) drug resistance with a focus on multidrug-resistance (MDR) and fluoroquinolone resistance in South Korea. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the drug susceptibility testing results of culture-confirmed Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates collected from 2010 to 2014 at seven tertiary hospitals in South Korea. RESULTS A total of 5,599 cases were included: 4,927 (88.0%) were new cases and 672 (12.0%) were previously treated cases. The MDR rate has significantly decreased from 6.0% in 2010 to 3.0% in 2014 among new cases, and from 28.6% in 2010 to 18.4% in 2014 among previously treated cases (p < 0.001 and p = 0.027, respectively). The resistance rate to any f luoroquinolone was 0.8% (43/5,221) in non-MDR-TB patients, as compared to 26.2% (99/378) in MDR-TB patients (p < 0.001). There was no significant change in the trend of fluoroquinolone resistance among both nonMDR-TB and MDR-TB patients. Among the 43 non-MDR-TB patients with fluoroquinolone resistance, 38 (88.4%) had fluoroquinolone mono-resistant isolates. CONCLUSION The prevalence of MDR-TB has significantly decreased from 2010 to 2014. The prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance among non-MDR-TB patients was low, but the existence of fluoroquinolone mono-resistant TB may be a warning on the widespread use of fluoroquinolone in the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeonseok Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Jeong Ha Mok
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Bohyoung Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Taehoon Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Hyun-Kyung Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Hang Jea Jang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Yu Ji Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea
| | - Doosoo Jeon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
- Correspondence to Doosoo Jeon, M.D. Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, 20 Geumo-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan 50612, Korea Tel: +82-55-360-1414 Fax: +82-55-360-1759 E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ahmad N, Ahuja SD, Akkerman OW, Alffenaar JWC, Anderson LF, Baghaei P, Bang D, Barry PM, Bastos ML, Behera D, Benedetti A, Bisson GP, Boeree MJ, Bonnet M, Brode SK, Brust JCM, Cai Y, Caumes E, Cegielski JP, Centis R, Chan PC, Chan ED, Chang KC, Charles M, Cirule A, Dalcolmo MP, D'Ambrosio L, de Vries G, Dheda K, Esmail A, Flood J, Fox GJ, Fréchet-Jachym M, Fregona G, Gayoso R, Gegia M, Gler MT, Gu S, Guglielmetti L, Holtz TH, Hughes J, Isaakidis P, Jarlsberg L, Kempker RR, Keshavjee S, Khan FA, Kipiani M, Koenig SP, Koh WJ, Kritski A, Kuksa L, Kvasnovsky CL, Kwak N, Lan Z, Lange C, Laniado-Laborín R, Lee M, Leimane V, Leung CC, Leung ECC, Li PZ, Lowenthal P, Maciel EL, Marks SM, Mase S, Mbuagbaw L, Migliori GB, Milanov V, Miller AC, Mitnick CD, Modongo C, Mohr E, Monedero I, Nahid P, Ndjeka N, O'Donnell MR, Padayatchi N, Palmero D, Pape JW, Podewils LJ, Reynolds I, Riekstina V, Robert J, Rodriguez M, Seaworth B, Seung KJ, Schnippel K, Shim TS, Singla R, Smith SE, Sotgiu G, Sukhbaatar G, Tabarsi P, Tiberi S, Trajman A, Trieu L, Udwadia ZF, van der Werf TS, Veziris N, Viiklepp P, Vilbrun SC, Walsh K, Westenhouse J, Yew WW, Yim JJ, Zetola NM, Zignol M, Menzies D. Treatment correlates of successful outcomes in pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet 2018; 392:821-834. [PMID: 30215381 PMCID: PMC6463280 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31644-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 384] [Impact Index Per Article: 64.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2018] [Revised: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment outcomes for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis remain poor. We aimed to estimate the association of treatment success and death with the use of individual drugs, and the optimal number and duration of treatment with those drugs in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. METHODS In this individual patient data meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify potentially eligible observational and experimental studies published between Jan 1, 2009, and April 30, 2016. We also searched reference lists from all systematic reviews of treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis published since 2009. To be eligible, studies had to report original results, with end of treatment outcomes (treatment completion [success], failure, or relapse) in cohorts of at least 25 adults (aged >18 years). We used anonymised individual patient data from eligible studies, provided by study investigators, regarding clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Using propensity score-matched generalised mixed effects logistic, or linear regression, we calculated adjusted odds ratios and adjusted risk differences for success or death during treatment, for specific drugs currently used to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, as well as the number of drugs used and treatment duration. FINDINGS Of 12 030 patients from 25 countries in 50 studies, 7346 (61%) had treatment success, 1017 (8%) had failure or relapse, and 1729 (14%) died. Compared with failure or relapse, treatment success was positively associated with the use of linezolid (adjusted risk difference 0·15, 95% CI 0·11 to 0·18), levofloxacin (0·15, 0·13 to 0·18), carbapenems (0·14, 0·06 to 0·21), moxifloxacin (0·11, 0·08 to 0·14), bedaquiline (0·10, 0·05 to 0·14), and clofazimine (0·06, 0·01 to 0·10). There was a significant association between reduced mortality and use of linezolid (-0·20, -0·23 to -0·16), levofloxacin (-0·06, -0·09 to -0·04), moxifloxacin (-0·07, -0·10 to -0·04), or bedaquiline (-0·14, -0·19 to -0·10). Compared with regimens without any injectable drug, amikacin provided modest benefits, but kanamycin and capreomycin were associated with worse outcomes. The remaining drugs were associated with slight or no improvements in outcomes. Treatment outcomes were significantly worse for most drugs if they were used despite in-vitro resistance. The optimal number of effective drugs seemed to be five in the initial phase, and four in the continuation phase. In these adjusted analyses, heterogeneity, based on a simulated I2 method, was high for approximately half the estimates for specific drugs, although relatively low for number of drugs and durations analyses. INTERPRETATION Although inferences are limited by the observational nature of these data, treatment outcomes were significantly better with use of linezolid, later generation fluoroquinolones, bedaquiline, clofazimine, and carbapenems for treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. These findings emphasise the need for trials to ascertain the optimal combination and duration of these drugs for treatment of this condition. FUNDING American Thoracic Society, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, European Respiratory Society, Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nafees Ahmad
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of Baluchistan, Quetta, Pakistan
| | - Shama D Ahuja
- Bureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, NY, USA
| | - Onno W Akkerman
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Tuberculosis Centre Beatrixoord, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jan-Willem C Alffenaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Laura F Anderson
- Global Tuberculosis Program, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Parvaneh Baghaei
- Clinical Tuberculosis and Epidemiology Research Center, NRITLD, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Didi Bang
- Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pennan M Barry
- Tuberculosis Control Branch, Division of Communicable Disease Control, Center for Infectious Diseases, California Department of Public Health, CA, USA
| | - Mayara L Bastos
- Social Medicine Institute, Epidemiology Department, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Digamber Behera
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research & Capacity Building in Chronic Respiratory Diseases, Chandigarh, India; Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Andrea Benedetti
- Montreal Chest Institute, McGill University Health Center Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Gregory P Bisson
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Martin J Boeree
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Radboud University Medicale Centre Nijmegen and Dekkerswald Radboudumc Groesbeek, Netherlands
| | - Maryline Bonnet
- Epicentre MSF, Paris, France; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement UM233, INSERM U1175, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Sarah K Brode
- Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology, University of Toronto, West Park Healthcare Centre, University Health Network, and Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - James C M Brust
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Division of Infectious Diseases, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ying Cai
- Tuberculosis Research Section, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Eric Caumes
- AP-HP, Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Paris, France
| | - J Peter Cegielski
- Division of Global HIV and TB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Rosella Centis
- World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Maugeri Care and Research Institute, Tradate, Italy
| | - Pei-Chun Chan
- Division of Chronic Infectious Diseases, Taiwan Centers for Disease Control, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Edward D Chan
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA; VA Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Kwok-Chiu Chang
- Department of Health, Tuberculosis and Chest Service, Centre for Health Protection, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Macarthur Charles
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Haiti Country Office, Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Andra Cirule
- Centre of TB and Lung Diseases, Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia
| | | | - Lia D'Ambrosio
- World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Maugeri Care and Research Institute, Tradate, Italy; Public Health Consulting Group, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Gerard de Vries
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands; KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, Netherlands
| | - Keertan Dheda
- Centre for Lung Infection and Immunity, Department of Medicine & UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Aliasgar Esmail
- Centre for Lung Infection and Immunity, Department of Medicine & UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jennifer Flood
- Tuberculosis Control Branch, Division of Communicable Disease Control, Center for Infectious Diseases, California Department of Public Health, CA, USA
| | - Gregory J Fox
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Geisa Fregona
- University Federal of Espirito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
| | | | - Medea Gegia
- Global Tuberculosis Program, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Sue Gu
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Lorenzo Guglielmetti
- AP-HP, Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène, Centre National de Référence des Mycobactéries et de la Résistance des Mycobactéries aux Antituberculeux, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses (CIMI; INSERM U1135/UMRS CR7/CNRS ERL 8255), Bactériologie, Faculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Sanatorium, Centre Hospitalier de Bligny, Briis-sous-Forges, France
| | - Timothy H Holtz
- Division of Global HIV and TB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | - Leah Jarlsberg
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Russell R Kempker
- Emory University School of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Salmaan Keshavjee
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Faiz Ahmad Khan
- Montreal Chest Institute, McGill University Health Center Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Maia Kipiani
- National Center for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Serena P Koenig
- Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Haitian Study Group for Kaposi's Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections (GHESKIO), Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Won-Jung Koh
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Afranio Kritski
- Academic Tuberculosis Program, School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Liga Kuksa
- Department of MDR TB, Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia
| | - Charlotte L Kvasnovsky
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
| | - Nakwon Kwak
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Zhiyi Lan
- Montreal Chest Institute, McGill University Health Center Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Christoph Lange
- Division of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Research Center Borstel, Germany; German Center for Infection Research, Clinical Tuberculosis Unit, Borstel, Germany; International Health/Infectious Diseases, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany; Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Myungsun Lee
- Clinical Research Section, International Tuberculosis Research Centre, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Vaira Leimane
- Centre of TB and Lung Diseases, Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia
| | - Chi-Chiu Leung
- Department of Health, Tuberculosis and Chest Service, Centre for Health Protection, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Eric Chung-Ching Leung
- Department of Health, Tuberculosis and Chest Service, Centre for Health Protection, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Pei Zhi Li
- Montreal Chest Institute, McGill University Health Center Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Phil Lowenthal
- Tuberculosis Control Branch, Division of Communicable Disease Control, Center for Infectious Diseases, California Department of Public Health, CA, USA
| | | | - Suzanne M Marks
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sundari Mase
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Regional WHO Office, New Delhi, India
| | - Lawrence Mbuagbaw
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Biostatistics Unit, Father Sean O'Sullivan Research Centre, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Giovanni B Migliori
- World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Maugeri Care and Research Institute, Tradate, Italy
| | - Vladimir Milanov
- Medical Faculty, Medical University-Sofia, University Hospital for Respiratory Diseases "St. Sofia", Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Ann C Miller
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carole D Mitnick
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Erika Mohr
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Khayelitsha, South Africa
| | - Ignacio Monedero
- TB-HIV Department, International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Paris, France
| | - Payam Nahid
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Norbert Ndjeka
- National TB Programme, South African National Department of Health, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Max R O'Donnell
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nesri Padayatchi
- CAPRISA, MRC TB-HIV Treatment and Pathogenesis Research Unit, Durban, South Africa
| | - Domingo Palmero
- Pulmonology Division, Municipal Hospital F J Munĩz, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jean William Pape
- Haitian Study Group for Kaposi's Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections (GHESKIO), Port-au-Prince, Haiti; Center for Global Health, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laura J Podewils
- Division of Global HIV and TB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ian Reynolds
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Vija Riekstina
- Centre of TB and Lung Diseases, Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia
| | - Jérôme Robert
- AP-HP, Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène, Centre National de Référence des Mycobactéries et de la Résistance des Mycobactéries aux Antituberculeux, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses (CIMI; INSERM U1135/UMRS CR7/CNRS ERL 8255), Bactériologie, Faculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | | | - Barbara Seaworth
- Heartland National TB Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA
| | | | - Kathryn Schnippel
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Tae Sun Shim
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Rupak Singla
- National Institute of Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases, New Delhi, India
| | - Sarah E Smith
- Division of Global HIV and TB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Giovanni Sotgiu
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Statistics Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | | | - Payam Tabarsi
- Clinical Tuberculosis and Epidemiology Research Center, NRITLD, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Simon Tiberi
- Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Anete Trajman
- Social Medicine Institute, Epidemiology Department, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Montreal Chest Institute, McGill University Health Center Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Academic Tuberculosis Program, School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Lisa Trieu
- Bureau of Tuberculosis Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, NY, USA
| | | | - Tjip S van der Werf
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine/Infectious Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Nicolas Veziris
- AP-HP, Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène, Centre National de Référence des Mycobactéries et de la Résistance des Mycobactéries aux Antituberculeux, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses (CIMI; INSERM U1135/UMRS CR7/CNRS ERL 8255), Bactériologie, Faculté de Médecine Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Piret Viiklepp
- Estonian Tuberculosis Registry, National Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Stalz Charles Vilbrun
- Haitian Study Group for Kaposi's Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections (GHESKIO), Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Kathleen Walsh
- Haitian Study Group for Kaposi's Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections (GHESKIO), Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Janice Westenhouse
- Tuberculosis Control Branch, Division of Communicable Disease Control, Center for Infectious Diseases, California Department of Public Health, CA, USA
| | - Wing-Wai Yew
- Stanley Ho Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Jae-Joon Yim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Matteo Zignol
- Global Tuberculosis Program, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dick Menzies
- Montreal Chest Institute, McGill University Health Center Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee H, Ahn S, Hwang NY, Jeon K, Kwon OJ, Huh HJ, Lee NY, Koh WJ. Treatment outcomes of rifabutin-containing regimens for rifabutin-sensitive multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Infect Dis 2018; 65:135-141. [PMID: 29224631 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2017] [Revised: 10/14/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate whether rifabutin can improve treatment outcomes in patients with rifabutin-sensitive MDR-TB. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed on 76 patients with rifabutin-sensitive MDR-TB who were treated with or without rifabutin between 2006 and 2011. RESULTS Overall, 75% (57/76) of patients achieved favorable outcomes, including cure (53/76, 70%) and treatment completion (4/76, 5%). In contrast, 25% (19/76) had unfavorable treatment outcomes, which included treatment failure (6/76, 8%), death (2/76, 3%), loss to follow-up (4/76. 5%), and no evaluation due to transfer to other institutions (7/76, 9%). Rifabutin was given to 52 (68%) of the 76 patients with rifabutin-sensitive MDR-TB. Although favorable treatment outcomes were more frequent in patients who received rifabutin [81% (42/52)] than in those who did not receive rifabutin [63% (15/24)], this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.154). However, in multivariable regression logistic analysis, use of rifabutin was significantly associated with favorable treatment outcomes in patients with rifabutin-sensitive MDR-TB (adjusted odds ratio=9.80, 95% confidence interval=1.65-58.37, P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that the use of rifabutin can improve treatment outcomes in patients with rifabutin-sensitive MDR-TB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Lee
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Soohyun Ahn
- Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Na Young Hwang
- Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyeongman Jeon
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - O Jung Kwon
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hee Jae Huh
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nam Yong Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Won-Jung Koh
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fan X, Cheng H, Wang X, Ye E, Loh XJ, Wu YL, Li Z. Thermoresponsive Supramolecular Chemotherapy by "V"-Shaped Armed β-Cyclodextrin Star Polymer to Overcome Drug Resistance. Adv Healthc Mater 2018; 7:e1701143. [PMID: 29280358 DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201701143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2017] [Revised: 11/09/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Pump mediated drug efflux is the key reason to result in the failure of chemotherapy. Herein, a novel star polymer β-CD-v-(PEG-β-PNIPAAm)7 consisting of a β-CD core, grafted with thermo-responsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm) and biocompatible poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) in the multiple "V"-shaped arms is designed and further fabricated into supramolecular nanocarriers for drug resistant cancer therapy. The star polymer could encapsulate chemotherapeutics between β-cyclodextrin and anti-cancer drug via inclusion complex (IC). Furthermore, the temperature induced chain association of PNIPAAm segments facilitated the IC to form supramolecular nanoparticles at 37 °C, whereas the presence of PEG impart great stability to the self-assemblies. When incubated with MDR-1 membrane pump regulated drug resistant tumor cells, much higher and faster cellular uptake of the supramolecular nanoparticles were detected, and the enhanced intracellular retention of drugs could lead to significant inhibition of cell growth. Further in vivo evaluation showed high therapeutic efficacy in suppressing drug resistant tumor growth without a significant impact on the normal functions of main organs. This work signifies thermo-responsive supramolecular chemotherapy is promising in combating pump mediated drug resistance in both in vitro and in vivo models, which may be encouraging for the advanced drug delivery platform design to overcome drug resistant cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoshan Fan
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Henan Province for Green Manufacturing of Fine Chemicals; Key Laboratory of Green Chemical Media and Reactions; Ministry of Education; School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering; Henan Normal University; Xinxiang 453007 China
| | - Hongwei Cheng
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Target Research and State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology; School of Pharmaceutical Sciences; Xiamen University; Xiamen 361102 China
| | - Xiaoyuan Wang
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Target Research and State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology; School of Pharmaceutical Sciences; Xiamen University; Xiamen 361102 China
| | - Enyi Ye
- Institute of Materials Research and Engineering; A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research); 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis #08-03 Singapore 138634 Singapore
| | - Xian Jun Loh
- Institute of Materials Research and Engineering; A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research); 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis #08-03 Singapore 138634 Singapore
| | - Yun-Long Wu
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Target Research and State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology; School of Pharmaceutical Sciences; Xiamen University; Xiamen 361102 China
| | - Zibiao Li
- Institute of Materials Research and Engineering; A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research); 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis #08-03 Singapore 138634 Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Limited Effect of Later-Generation Fluoroquinolones in the Treatment of Ofloxacin-Resistant and Moxifloxacin-Susceptible Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2018; 62:AAC.01784-17. [PMID: 29203478 DOI: 10.1128/aac.01784-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent data conflict on the clinical efficacy of later-generation fluoroquinolones, such as moxifloxacin or levofloxacin, for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) that is resistant to ofloxacin but susceptible to moxifloxacin. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether later-generation fluoroquinolones can improve treatment outcomes in patients with ofloxacin-resistant, moxifloxacin-susceptible MDR-TB. A retrospective cohort study was performed on 208 patients with moxifloxacin-susceptible MDR-TB who were treated between 2006 and 2011. Later-generation fluoroquinolones were used for all patients. Overall, 171 patients (82%) had ofloxacin-susceptible, moxifloxacin-susceptible MDR-TB (ofloxacin-susceptible group), and 37 (18%) had ofloxacin-resistant, moxifloxacin-susceptible MDR-TB (ofloxacin-resistant group). Compared to the ofloxacin-susceptible group, the ofloxacin-resistant group was more likely to have a history of MDR-TB treatment (P < 0.001) and cavitary lesions on chest radiography (P < 0.001). In addition, the ofloxacin-resistant group was more likely than the ofloxacin-susceptible group to have resistance to the drugs pyrazinamide (P = 0.003), streptomycin (P = 0.015), prothionamide (P < 0.001), and para-aminosalicylic acid (P < 0.001). Favorable outcomes were more frequently achieved for the ofloxacin-susceptible group than for the ofloxacin-resistant group (91% [156/171] versus 57% [21/37], respectively [P < 0.001]). In multivariable regression logistic analysis, the ofloxacin-susceptible group was about 5.36 (95% confidence interval, 1.55 to 18.53) times more likely than the ofloxacin-resistant group (P < 0.001) to have favorable outcomes. Despite in vitro moxifloxacin susceptibility, the frequency of favorable treatment outcomes for ofloxacin-resistant MDR-TB was significantly lower than that for ofloxacin-susceptible MDR-TB, even when later-generation fluoroquinolones were used, indicating that more-aggressive therapies may be needed for ofloxacin-resistant MDR-TB.
Collapse
|
17
|
Outcomes of pulmonary tuberculosis in patients with discordant phenotypic isoniazid resistance testing. Respir Med 2017; 133:6-11. [PMID: 29173450 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2017] [Revised: 09/27/2017] [Accepted: 11/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The discrepancy rates of drug susceptibility testing (DST) results between solid and liquid media have been reported to range from 2.4 to 7.4% for isoniazid. Most isolate with isoniazid DST discrepancies between solid and liquid media test as susceptible on solid medium and resistant in liquid medium, however, the optimal management of patients with discordant testing is unknown. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of treatment regimen on treatment outcomes when patients with rifampicin-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis have isoniazid resistance (INH-R) in liquid medium but isoniazid susceptibility (INH-S) on solid medium. METHOD This study was retrospectively conducted by reviewing patient medical records on the liquid compared to solid culture based phenotypic testing at Samsung Medical Center between January 2009 and December 2015. The study population which have INH-R in liquid medium and INH-S on solid medium was divided into two groups: group A (n = 30), which included patients treated for INH-S tuberculosis by discontinuing pyrazinamide (and ethambutol), and group B (n = 56), which included patients treated for INH-R tuberculosis by continuing pyrazinamide and/or adding fluoroquinolone. Unfavorable outcomes included treatment failure and relapse. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups including demographic data, comorbidities, radiologic data, and treatment duration. However, baseline smear positive rates were more frequent in group A (19/30, 63.3%) than in group B (22/56, 39.3%; P = 0.033). Only three patients had unfavorable outcomes; one was bacteriologically proven treatment failure and the other two were clinically judged as unfavorable outcomes. All of them were in the group A (3/30, 10%); no unfavorable outcomes occurred in the group B (0/56, 0%; P = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS Unfavorable outcomes were less frequent in the group B than in the group A, indicating that treatment regimen modification according to DST results on liquid medium could improve treatment outcomes in patients with rifampicin-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis. Further studies are required to confirm these findings to overcome the small number of unfavorable outcomes.
Collapse
|
18
|
Jeon D. WHO Treatment Guidelines for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, 2016 Update: Applicability in South Korea. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2017; 80:336-343. [PMID: 28905529 PMCID: PMC5617849 DOI: 10.4046/trd.2017.0049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Revised: 07/02/2017] [Accepted: 07/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite progress made in tuberculosis control worldwide, the disease burden and treatment outcome of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients have remained virtually unchanged. In 2016, the World Health Organization released new guidelines for the management of MDR-TB. The guidelines are intended to improve detection rate and treatment outcome for MDR-TB through novel, rapid molecular testing and shorter treatment regimens. Key changes include the introduction of a new, shorter MDR-TB treatment regimen, a new classification of medicines and updated recommendations for the conventional MDR-TB regimen. This paper will review these key changes and discuss the potential issues with regard to the implementation of these guidelines in South Korea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doosoo Jeon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wirth D, Dass R, Hettle R. Cost-effectiveness of adding novel or group 5 interventions to a background regimen for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Germany. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:182. [PMID: 28270207 PMCID: PMC5341441 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2118-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2016] [Accepted: 02/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is complex, lengthy, and involves a minimum of four drugs termed a background regimen (BR), that have not previously been prescribed or that have proven susceptible to patient sputum culture isolates. In recent years, promising new treatment options have emerged as add-on therapies to a BR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term costs and effectiveness of adding the novel or group 5 interventions bedaquiline, delamanid, and linezolid to a background regimen (BR) of drugs for the treatment of adult patients with pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), within their marketing authorisations, from a German healthcare cost-effectiveness perspective. Methods A cohort-based Markov model was developed to simulate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of bedaquiline plus BR, delamanid plus BR, or linezolid plus BR versus BR alone in the treatment of MDR-TB, over a 10-year time horizon. Effectiveness of treatment was evaluated in Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs) and Life-Years Gained (LYG), using inputs from clinical trials for bedaquiline and delamanid and from a German observational study for linezolid. Cost data were obtained from German Drug Directory costs (€/2015), published literature, and expert opinion. A 3% yearly discount rate was applied. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results The total discounted costs per-patient were €85,575 for bedaquiline plus BR, €81,079 for delamanid plus BR, and €80,460 for linezolid plus BR, compared with a cost of €60,962 for BR alone. The total discounted QALYs per-patient were 5.95 for bedaquiline plus BR, 5.36 for delamanid plus BR, and 3.91 for linezolid plus BR, compared with 3.68 for BR alone. All interventions were therefore associated with higher QALYs and higher costs than BR alone, with incremental costs per QALY gained of €22,238 for bedaquiline, €38,703 for delamanid, and €87,484 for linezolid, versus BR alone. In a fully incremental analysis, bedaquiline plus BR was the most cost-effective treatment option at thresholds greater than €22,000 per QALY gained. In probabilistic analyses, the probability that bedaquiline plus BR was the most cost-effective treatment strategy at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000 was 54.5%, compared with 22.9% for BR alone, 18.2% for delamanid plus BR, and 4.4% for linezolid. Conclusions In Germany, the addition of bedaquiline, delamanid, or linezolid to a BR would result in QALY gains over BR alone. Based on this analysis, bedaquiline is likely to be the most cost-effective intervention for the treatment of MDR-TB, when added to a BR regimen at thresholds greater than €22,000 per QALY. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2118-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Wirth
- Health Economics & Market Access, Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Johnson & Johnson Platz 1, 41470, Neuss, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
de Knegt GJ, van der Meijden A, de Vogel CP, Aarnoutse RE, de Steenwinkel JEM. Activity of moxifloxacin and linezolid against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in combination with potentiator drugs verapamil, timcodar, colistin and SQ109. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2017; 49:302-307. [PMID: 28162983 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2016] [Revised: 11/03/2016] [Accepted: 11/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Current treatment for tuberculosis (TB) is complicated by the emergence of multidrug resistant TB (MDR-TB). As a result, there is an urgent need for new powerful anti-TB regimens and novel strategies. In this study, we aimed to potentiate a moxifloxacin + linezolid backbone as treatment for MDR-TB with the efflux pump inhibitors verapamil and timcodar as well as with drugs that act on mycobacterial cell wall stability such as colistin and SQ109. Using a time-kill kinetics assay, the activities of moxifloxacin, linezolid, verapamil, timcodar, colistin and SQ109 as single drugs against Mycobacterium tuberculosis were evaluated. In addition, the activity of the moxifloxacin + linezolid backbone in combination with one of the potentiator drugs was assessed. As little as 0.125 mg/L moxifloxacin achieved 99% killing of M. tuberculosis after 6 days of exposure. Linezolid showed moderate killing but 99% killing was not achieved. Verapamil, timcodar and colistin only resulted in killing with the highest concentrations tested but 99% killing was not achieved. SQ109 resulted in complete elimination after 1 day of exposure to 256 mg/L and in 99% elimination after 6 days of exposure to 1 mg/L. Furthermore, colistin added to the moxifloxacin + linezolid backbone resulted in increased elimination, whereas verapamil, timcodar and SQ109 showed no added value to the backbone. This finding that colistin potentiates the activity of the moxifloxacin + linezolid backbone against M. tuberculosis suggests its potential role in further studies on the applicability of a moxifloxacin + linezolid treatment of MDR-TB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerjo J de Knegt
- Department of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Aart van der Meijden
- Department of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Corné P de Vogel
- Department of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob E Aarnoutse
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan E M de Steenwinkel
- Department of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Choice between Levofloxacin and Moxifloxacin and Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2016; 13:364-70. [PMID: 26871879 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201510-690bc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE We previously showed that the choice of levofloxacin or moxifloxacin for the treatment of patients with fluoroquinolone-sensitive multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) did not affect sputum culture conversion at 3 months of treatment. OBJECTIVES To compare final treatment outcomes between patients with MDR-TB randomized to levofloxacin or moxifloxacin. METHODS A total of 151 participants with MDR-TB who were included for the final analysis in our previous trial were followed through the end of treatment. Treatment outcomes were compared between 77 patients in the levofloxacin group and 74 in the moxifloxacin group, based on the 2008 World Health Organization definitions as well as 2013 revised definitions of treatment outcomes. In addition, the time to culture conversion was compared between the two groups. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Treatment outcomes were not different between the two groups, based on 2008 World Health Organization definitions as well as 2013 definitions. With 2008 definitions, cure was achieved in 54 patients (70.1%) in the levofloxacin group and 54 (73.0%) in the moxifloxacin group (P = 0.72). Treatment success rates, including cure and treatment completed, were not different between the two groups (87.0 vs. 81.1%, P = 0.38). With 2013 definitions, cure rates (83.1 vs. 78.4%, P = 0.54) and treatment success rates (84.4 vs. 79.7%, P = 0.53) were also similar between the levofloxacin and moxifloxacin groups. Time to culture conversion was also not different between the two groups (27.0 vs. 45.0 d, P = 0.11 on liquid media; 17.0 vs. 42.0 d, P = 0.14 on solid media). Patients in the levofloxacin group had more adverse events than those in the moxifloxacin group (79.2 vs. 63.5%, P = 0.03), especially musculoskeletal ones (37.7 vs. 14.9%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The choice of levofloxacin or moxifloxacin made no difference to the final treatment outcome among patients with fluoroquinolone-sensitive MDR-TB. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicalrials.gov (NCT01055145).
Collapse
|
22
|
Kang HK, Jeong BH, Lee H, Park HY, Jeon K, Huh HJ, Ki CS, Lee NY, Koh WJ. Clinical significance of smear positivity for acid-fast bacilli after ≥5 months of treatment in patients with drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e4540. [PMID: 27495111 PMCID: PMC4979865 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000004540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) with acid-fast bacilli (AFB)-positive sputum smear at 5 months or later during treatment are considered to be cases of treatment failure according to World Health Organization guidelines. This study evaluated the proportion, clinical characteristics, and significance of positive sputum smears after ≥5 months of standard treatment in patients with drug-susceptible pulmonary TB.This was a retrospective cohort study of 1611 patients with culture-confirmed drug-susceptible pulmonary TB who received standard anti-TB treatment from January 2009 to February 2014. Forty-one patients (2.5%) who were smear-positive after ≥5 months of treatment and 123 age- and sex-matched control patients were evaluated.Among the 41 smear-positive patients, culture of the sputum specimens yielded Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in 1 patient (2.4%), nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in 7 (17.1%), and no growth in the remaining 33 patients (80.5%). Treatment was successfully completed in 40 patients (97.6%) with prolongation of the continuation phase regimens without change to second-line anti-TB treatment. In patients with smear positivity after ≥5 months of treatment compared with controls, cavitation on chest radiographs (53.7% vs. 25.2%, P = 0.001), bilateral involvement (51.2% vs. 30.1%, P = 0.01) and combined pleural effusion (26.8% vs. 10.6%, P = 0.01) were found more frequently at the time of treatment initiation, and paradoxical response occurred more commonly (19.5% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.002) during treatment.Smear-positive sputum after ≥5 months of standard anti-TB treatment was mainly because of nonviable MTB bacilli or NTM in patients with drug-susceptible pulmonary TB. AFB smear alone should not be used to assess treatment failure and careful examination of microbiologic status, including culture and drug susceptibility testing, is needed before making changes to retreatment regimens or empirical second-line anti-TB regimens in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Koo Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Goyang, Gyeonggi
| | - Byeong-Ho Jeong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
| | - Hyun Lee
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
| | - Hye Yun Park
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
| | - Kyeongman Jeon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
| | - Hee Jae Huh
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chang-Seok Ki
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nam Yong Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Won-Jung Koh
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
- Correspondence: Won-Jung Koh, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, South Korea (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kwon YS, Koh WJ. Synthetic investigational new drugs for the treatment of tuberculosis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2015; 25:183-93. [PMID: 26576631 DOI: 10.1517/13543784.2016.1121993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tuberculosis (TB) is a major global health concern. And while there are treatments already on the market, there is a demand for new drugs that are effective and safe against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which reduce the number of drugs and the duration of treatment in both drug-susceptible TB and multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB). AREA COVERED This review covers promising novel investigational TB drugs that are currently under development. Specifically, the authors review the efficacy of novel agents for the treatment of TB in preclinical, phase I and phase II clinical trials. The authors also review the safety and tolerability profiles of these drugs. EXPERT OPINION Bedaquiline and delamanid are the most promising novel drugs for the treatment of MDR-TB, each having high efficacy and tolerability. However, the best regimen for achieving better outcomes and reducing adverse drug reactions remains to be determined, with safety concerns regarding cardiac events due to QT prolongation still to be addressed. Pretomanid is a novel drug that potentially shortens the duration of treatment in both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant TB in combination with moxifloxacin and pyrazinamide. Linezolid shows marked efficacy in the treatment of MDR-TB and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB), but the drug is known to cause significant adverse drug reactions, including peripheral neuropathy, optic neuropathy and myelosuppression. These adverse reactions must be considered prior to prescribing long-term usage of this drug.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong-Soo Kwon
- a Department of Internal Medicine , Chonnam National University Hospital , Gwangju , South Korea
| | - Won-Jung Koh
- b Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine , Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine , Seoul , South Korea
| |
Collapse
|