Monotherapy with minocycline or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections

Clinical practice guideline for the prevention and management of peritoneal dialysis associated infections in children: 2024 update

Infection-related complications remain the most significant cause for morbidity and technique failure in infants, children and adolescents who receive maintenance peritoneal dialysis (PD). The 2024 update of the Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prevention and Management of Peritoneal Dialysis Associated Infection in Children builds upon previous such guidelines published in 2000 and 2012 and provides comprehensive treatment guidance as recommended by an international group of pediatric PD experts based upon a review of published literature and pediatric PD registry data. The workgroup prioritized updating key clinical issues contained in the 2012 guidelines, in addition to addressing additional questions developed using the PICO format. A variety of new guideline statements, highlighted by those pertaining to antibiotic therapy of peritonitis as a result of the evolution of antibiotic susceptibilities, antibiotic stewardship and clinical registry data, as well as new clinical benchmarks, are included. Recommendations for future research designed to fill important knowledge gaps are also provided.

Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole vs Minocycline for the Treatment of Nonurinary Monomicrobial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections in Hospitalized Patients

BACKGROUND

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic, gram-negative bacillus with few therapeutic options due to a high level of intrinsic resistance. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) is recommended as the first-line treatment; however, minocycline (MIN) has been shown to have similar clinical outcomes in treating S. maltophilia and addresses concern for increasing resistance to SXT.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety outcomes of nonurinary, monomicrobial infections due to S. maltophilia in hospitalized patients treated with MIN or SXT.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of hospitalized adult patients receiving MIN or SXT for nonurinary monomicrobial S. maltophilia infection from April 1, 2018 to March 31, 2020. The primary outcome was clinical disposition classified as rates of clinical failure, clinical improvement, or clinical success.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients (88.2%) received MIN and 11 patients (11.8%) received SXT initially. Clinical failure occurred in 16 (19.5%) patients in the MIN group and in 4 (36.4%) patients in the SXT group (P = 0.242). Clinical improvement occurred in 11 (13.4%) patients in the MIN group and in 1 (9.1%) patient in the SXT group (P = 1.0). Clinical success occurred in 55 (67.1%) patients in the MIN group and in 6 (54.5%) patients in the SXT group (P = 0.503). Total duration of antimicrobial therapy (P = 0.3198), in-hospital mortality (P = 1.0), hospital length of stay (P = 0.9668), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (P = 0.1384), and 30-day readmission (P = 0.686) were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Rates of clinical failure, clinical improvement, or clinical success were similar between MIN and SXT for nonurinary monomicrobial S. maltophilia infections.

Global mapping of antibiotic resistance rates among clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are clinically important due to its intrinsic resistance to a broad range of antibiotics. Therefore, selecting the most appropriate antibiotic to treat S. maltophilia infection is a major challenge.

AIM

The current meta-analysis aimed to investigate the global prevalence of antibiotic resistance among S. maltophilia isolates to the develop more effective therapeutic strategies.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was performed using the appropriate search syntax after searching Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus databases (May 2023). Statistical analysis was performed using Pooled and the random effects model in R and the metafor package. A total of 11,438 articles were retrieved. After a thorough evaluation, 289 studies were finally eligible for inclusion in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESULT

Present analysis indicated that the highest incidences of resistance were associated with doripenem (97%), cefoxitin (96%), imipenem and cefuroxime (95%), ampicillin (94%), ceftriaxone (92%), aztreonam (91%) and meropenem (90%) which resistance to Carbapenems is intrinsic. The lowest resistance rates were documented for minocycline (3%), cefiderocol (4%). The global resistance rate to TMP-SMX remained constant in two periods before and after 2010 (14.4% vs. 14.6%). A significant increase in resistance to tigecycline and ceftolozane/tazobactam was observed before and after 2010.

CONCLUSIONS

Minocycline and cefiderocol can be considered the preferred treatment options due to low resistance rates, although regional differences in resistance rates to other antibiotics should be considered. The low global prevalence of resistance to TMP-SMX as a first-line treatment for S. maltophilia suggests that it remains an effective treatment option.

Comparison of Doxycycline or Minocycline to Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim for Treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a multidrug-resistant organism with limited antibiotic treatment options. Minocycline and doxycycline may be appropriate, but clinical data are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To compare tetracyclines (minocycline and doxycycline [TCN]) with standard of care, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (TMP-SMZ), in S. maltophilia pneumonia treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective, 2-center study evaluated patients treated for S. maltophilia pneumonia with TCN or TMP-SMZ for clinical success, defined as resolution of leukocytosis, fever, and tachypnea. Patients were classified as treatment with TCN or TMP-SMZ based on definitive agent used for ≥50% of the treatment course and ≥4 days. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, S. maltophilia confirmed on respiratory culture from January 2013 to November 2020, and appropriate definitive antibiotic dosing. Pregnancy, incarceration, S. maltophilia-resistant or intermediate to definitive therapy, and combination therapy for treatment of S. maltophilia pneumonia were exclusion criteria. Secondary outcomes were microbiologic success and recurrence or reinfection within 30 days requiring treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients were included (21 TCN [15 minocycline, 6 doxycycline], 59 TMP-SMZ). There was no difference in clinical success (28.6% vs 25.4%; P = 0.994), microbiologic success (n = 28, 55.6% vs 66.4%; P = 0.677), or recurrence or reinfection (n = 24, 66.7% vs 26.7%; P = 0.092) between TCN and TMP-SMZ, respectively.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Clinical and microbiologic success rates were similar in patients treated with TCN compared with TMP-SMZ for S. maltophilia pneumonia. These data suggest minocycline and doxycycline may be options to treat S. maltophilia pneumonia, but conclusive clinical data continue to be lacking.

Trends in the susceptibility of U.S. Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus species complex and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates to minocycline, 2014-2021

IMPORTANCE

Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus species complex and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are opportunistic, non-fermentative Gram-negative organisms that can cause serious hospital-acquired infections in immunocompromised patients. These pathogens are inherently resistant to several common drug classes and often acquire other resistance mechanisms, making them difficult to treat. In this study, we analyzed the trends of susceptibility of over 2,500 U.S. bacterial isolates collected from hospitalized patients over an 8-year period to minocycline, which is used to treat infections caused by these pathogens. These in vitro data suggest that minocycline is a useful treatment option for infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus species complex or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Emerging infections in vulnerable hosts: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Elizabethkingia anophelis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This systematic review aimed to explore the recent trends in the epidemiology, risk factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility of two emerging opportunistic pathogens, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Elizabethkingia anophelis .

RECENT FINDINGS

Since 2020, numerous outbreaks of S. maltophilia and E. anophelis have been reported worldwide. Most of these outbreaks have been associated with healthcare facilities, although one outbreak caused by E. anophelis in France was considered a community-associated infection. In terms of antimicrobial susceptibility, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ), levofloxacin, and minocycline have exhibited good efficacy against S. maltophilia . Additionally, cefiderocol and a combination of aztreonam and avibactam have shown promising results in in vitro susceptibility testing. For E. anophelis , there is currently no consensus on the optimal treatment. Although some studies have reported good efficacy with rifampin, TMP-SMZ, piperacillin/tazobactam, and cefoperazone/sulbactam, minocycline had the most favourable in vitro susceptibility rates. Cefiderocol may serve as an alternative due to its low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against E. anophelis . The role of vancomycin in treatment is still uncertain, although several successful cases with vancomycin treatment, even with high MIC values, have been reported.

SUMMARY

Immunocompromised patients are particularly vulnerable to infections caused by S. maltophilia and E. anophelis , but the optimal treatment strategy remains inconclusive. Further research is necessary to determine the most effective use of conventional and novel antimicrobial agents in combatting these multidrug-resistant pathogens.

Stenotrophomonas rhizophila Ep2.2 inhibits growth of Botrytis cinerea through the emission of volatile organic compounds, restricts leaf infection and primes defense genes

The bacterium Stenotrophomonas rhizophila is known to be beneficial for plants and has been frequently isolated from the rhizosphere of crops. In the present work, we isolated from the phyllosphere of an ornamental plant an epiphytic strain of S. rhizophila that we named Ep2.2 and investigated its possible application in crop protection. Compared to S. maltophilia LMG 958, a well-known plant beneficial species which behaves as opportunistic human pathogen, S. rhizophila Ep2.2 showed distinctive features, such as different motility, a generally reduced capacity to use carbon sources, a greater sensitivity to fusidic acid and potassium tellurite, and the inability to grow at the human body temperature. S. rhizophila Ep2.2 was able to inhibit in vitro growth of the plant pathogenic fungi Alternaria alternata and Botrytis cinerea through the emission of volatile compounds. Simultaneous PTR-MS and GC-MS analyses revealed the emission, by S. rhizophila Ep2.2, of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with well-documented antifungal activity, such as furans, sulphur-containing compounds and terpenes. When sprayed on tomato leaves and plants, S. rhizophila Ep2.2 was able to restrict B. cinerea infection and to prime the expression of Pti5, GluA and PR1 plant defense genes.

Inhalable Excipient-Free Dry Powder of Tigecycline for the Treatment of Pulmonary Infections

Tigecycline (TIG) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that has been approved for the treatment of a number of complicated infections, including community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Currently it is available only as an intravenous injection that undergoes rapid chemical degradation and limits the use to in-patient scenarios. The use of TIG as an inhaled dry powder inhaler may offer a promising treatment option for patients with multidrug-resistant respiratory tract infections, such as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia). This study explores the feasibility of engineering an inhaled powder formulation of TIG that could administer relevant doses at a wide range of inhalation flow rates while maintaining stability of this labile drug. Using air-jet milling, micronized TIG had excellent aerosolization efficiency, with over 80% of the device emitted dose being within the respirable range. TIG was also readily dispersed using different inhaler devices even when tested at different pressure drops and flow rates. Additionally, micronized TIG was stable for 6 months at 25 °C/60% RH and 40 °C/75% RH. Micronized TIG maintained a low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) of 0.8 μM and >0.5 μM, respectively in S. maltophilia cultures in vitro. These results strongly suggest that the micronization of TIG results in a stable and respirable formulation that can be delivered via the pulmonary route for the treatment of lung infections.

Steno-sphere: Navigating the enigmatic world of emerging multidrug-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen and frequent cause of serious nosocomial infections. Patient populations at greatest risk for these infections include the immunocompromised and those with chronic respiratory illnesses and prior antibiotic exposure, notably to carbapenems. Its complex virulence and resistance profile drastically limit available antibiotics, and incomplete breakpoint and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data to inform dose optimization further complicates therapeutic approaches. Clinical comparison data of first-line agents, including trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), quinolones, and minocycline, are limited to conflicting observational data with no clear benefit of a single agent or combination therapy. Newer antibiotic approaches, including cefiderocol and aztreonam- avibactam, are promising alternatives for extensively drug-resistant isolates; however, clinical outcomes data are needed. The potential clinical utility of bacteriophage for compassionate use in treating S. maltophilia infections remains to be determined since data is limited to in-vitro and sparse in-vivo work. This article provides a review of available literature for S. maltophilia infection management focused on related epidemiology, resistance mechanisms, identification, susceptibility testing, antimicrobial PK/PD, and emerging therapeutic strategies.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Efficacy of Available Treatments, with Critical Assessment of Novel Therapeutic Options

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SM) represents a challenging pathogen due to its resistance profile. A systematic review of the available evidence was conducted to evaluate the best treatment of SM infections to date, focusing on trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), fluoroquinolones (FQs), and tetracycline derivatives (TDs).

MATERIALS

PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception to 30 November 2022. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical failure, adverse events, and length of stay. A random effects meta-analysis was performed. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022321893).

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies, all retrospective, were included. A significant difference in terms of overall mortality was observed when comparing as a monotherapy TMP/SMX versus FQs (odds ratio (OR) 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.86, I2 = 33%; 11 studies, 2407 patients). The prediction interval (PI) did not touch the no effect line (1.06-1.93), but the results were not robust for the unmeasured confounding (E-value for point estimate of 1.71). When comparing TMP/SMX with TDs, the former showed an association with higher mortality but not significant and with a wide PI (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.79-4.82, PI 0.01-685.99, I2 = 0%; 3 studies, 346 patients). Monotherapies in general exerted a protective effect against death opposed to the combination regimens but were not significant (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.41-1.22, PI 0.16-3.08, I2 = 0%; 4 studies, 438 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Against SM infections, FQs and, possibly, TDs seem to be reasonable alternative choices to TMP/SMX. Data from clinical trials are urgently needed to better inform therapeutic choices in this setting by also taking into account newer agents.

Treatment, clinical outcomes, and predictors of mortality among a national cohort of hospitalized patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection

OBJECTIVES

To analyze treatment, clinical outcomes, and predictors of inpatient mortality in hospitalized patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

We included patients admitted to Veterans Affairs hospitals nationally with S. maltophilia cultures and treatment from 2010 to 2019. We described patient and clinical characteristics, antibiotic treatment, and clinical outcomes. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to evaluate predictors of inpatient mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 3891 hospitalized patients treated for an S. maltophilia infection, of which 13.7% died during admission. The most common antibiotic agents were piperacillin/tazobactam (39.7%), sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (23.3%), and levofloxacin (23.2%). Combination therapy was used in 16.6% of patients. Independent predictors of inpatient mortality identified in multivariable analysis included the following: presence of current acute respiratory failure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.63-6.19), shock (aOR 3.00, 95% CI 2.31-3.90), acute renal failure (aOR 2.06, 95% CI 1.64-2.60), and septicemia (aOR 1.90, 95% CI 1.49-2.42), age 65 years and older (aOR 2.05, 95% CI 1.07-3.94, reference age 18-49 years), hospital-acquired infection (aOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.48-2.37), Black (aOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.21-2.06) and other races (aOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.41-2.41, reference White), liver disease (aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.02-2.22), and median Charlson comorbidity score or higher (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08-1.71, reference less than median). Clinical outcomes were similar between patients infected with sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim-resistant, levofloxacin-resistant, and multidrug-resistant S. maltophilia strains compared to non-resistant strains.

CONCLUSIONS

In our national cohort of hospitalized patients with S. maltophilia infection, 13.7% of patients died during admission and several predictors of inpatient mortality were identified. Predictors related to the severity of infection were among the strongest identified. It is important that in severely ill patients presenting to the hospital, S. maltophilia be considered as a cause.

Antibiotic and metal resistance of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates from Eboling permafrost of the Tibetan Plateau

Whole-genome sequencing of pathogenic bacteria Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from a less polluted environment of permafrost can help understand the intrinsic resistome of both antibiotics and metals. This study aimed to examine the maximum minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of both antibiotics and metals, as well as antibiotic resistance genes and metal resistance genes annotated from whole-genome sequences. The permafrost S. maltophilia was sensitive to ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, streptomycin, and bacitracin, and resistant to chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, erythromycin, Zn²⁺, Ni²⁺, Cu²⁺, and Cr⁶⁺, with a lower maximum MIC, compared with clinical S. maltophilia. The former strain belonged to the lower antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) and metal resistance gene (MRG) clusters compared with the latter ones. The permafrost strain contained no or only one kind of ARG or MRG on a single genomic island, which explained the aforementioned lower maximum MIC and less diversity of ARGs or MRGs. The result indicated that the co-occurrence of antibiotic and metal resistance was due to a certain innate ability of S. maltophilia. The continuous human use of antibiotics or metals induced selective pressure, resulting in higher MIC and more diverse ARGs and MRGs in human-impacted environments.

In vitro and in vivo efficacy of minocycline-based therapy for Elizabethkingia anophelis and the impact of reduced minocycline susceptibility

OBJECTIVES

Elizabethkingia anophelis is inherently resistant to multiple antibiotics, except minocycline. This study aimed to determine the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of minocycline monotherapy and combination therapy against susceptible strains and the impact of reduced minocycline susceptibility.

METHODS

Three clinical isolates and one laboratory-induced mutant with reduced minocycline susceptibility were included. Time-kill and checkerboard assays were used to assess in vitro efficacy and synergy, respectively. Galleria mellonella infection and mouse pneumonia models were used to assess in vivo efficacy, and a mouse thigh infection model was used to determine the bacterial load.

RESULTS

Minocycline monotherapy exerted a modest inhibitory effect on three clinical minocycline-susceptible E. anophelis isolates in vitro, but delayed G. mellonella death and improved infected mouse survival; it also significantly reduced the in vivo bacterial load. Minocycline had decreased efficacy on G. mellonella and mice infected by the mutant with reduced minocycline susceptibility. Genome comparison revealed several spontaneous mutations associated with reduced minocycline susceptibility. Among eight antibiotics tested in combination with minocycline, rifampin consistently showed in vitro synergy. The addition of rifampin (1 mg/L) reduced the mutant prevention concentration of minocycline from 2-4 mg/L to < 0.5 mg/L. However, compared with monotherapy, the combination of rifampin and minocycline did not further reduce the bacterial load or improve the survival of G. mellonella or mice.

CONCLUSION

Minocycline monotherapy was in vivo effective against susceptible E. anophelis. Reduced minocycline susceptibility due to spontaneous mutation decreased its therapeutic efficacy. In combination with rifampin, it prevented the in vitro emergence of reduced susceptibility but did not provide additional in vivo survival benefit.

Trends in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia antibiotic resistance rates in the United States Veterans Affairs Health System

Introduction. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an important multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogen. While largely a hospital-acquired pathogen, there have been increasing reports of the pathogen in the community.

Gap Statement. Trends in S. maltophilia prevalence and resistance rates that include outpatient isolates are unknown.

Aim. We described recent trends in prevalence and resistance of S. maltophilia in the national Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare system.

Methodology. The study identified positive S. maltophilia clinical cultures among VA adult patients from 2010 to 2018 across all VA hospitals, long-term care facilities/units, and outpatient settings. Annual S. maltophilia resistance rates were evaluated. Multidrug resistant (MDR) was defined as resistance to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMX/TMP) and minocycline or levofloxacin. Time trends were assessed with regression analyses to estimate annual average percent changes (AAPC) with 95 % confidence intervals using Joinpoint software.

Results. Over the 9 year study period, 18 285  S . maltophilia cultures were identified (57 % hospital, 3 % long-term care, 40 % outpatient). The most common source of S. maltophilia cultures were respiratory cultures (34.6 %) followed by urine cultures (30.4 %). In VA hospitals and long-term care facilities, the number of S. maltophilia cultures decreased significantly (by 5.4% and 8.4 % per year respectively). Overall, 3.1 % of isolates were MDR which remained stable over the study period. Resistance to other antibiotics assessed mostly remained stable, except SMX/TMP resistance decreased significantly by 8.5 % (2010, 15 %; 2018, 6 %) per year in VA hospitals.

Conclusion. While previous work has recognized S. maltophilia as primarily a nosocomial pathogen, the present study found that 40 % of cultures collected were among outpatients. Between 2010 and 2018, the number of positive S. maltophilia cultures decreased significantly in the national VA Healthcare System. Resistance to SMX/TMP decreased over the study period in VA hospitals and now more closely reflects previously reported resistance rates worldwide (0–10 %). MDR S. maltophilia remained stable and low in the national VA Healthcare System.

Efficacy of Cefiderocol in Experimental Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia in Persistently Neutropenic Rabbits

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an important cause of pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. Cefiderocol is a parenteral siderophore cephalosporin with potent in vitro activity against S. maltophilia. We evaluated the efficacy of cefiderocol in a neutropenic rabbit model of S. maltophilia pneumonia in comparison to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX). The cefiderocol area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve extrapolated to 8 h (AUC_0–8) was lower (423.0 ± 40.9 μg·h/mL versus 713.6 ± 40.1 μg·h/mL) and clearance higher (252.77 ± 38.9 mL/h/kg versus 142.6 ± 32.9 mL/h/kg) in infected versus noninfected rabbits. We studied a clinical bloodstream S. maltophilia isolate with an MIC of 0.03 μg/mL of cefiderocol. Time spent above the MIC of cefiderocol for the majority of S. maltophilia isolates in rabbits recapitulated the plasma concentration-time profile observed in adult humans at the licensed dose of 2 g given intravenously (i.v.). Experimental groups consisted of 120 mg/kg cefiderocol i.v. every 8 hours (q8h); TMP-SMX, 5 mg/kg i.v. Q12h, and untreated controls (UCs). Treatment was administered for 10 days. Survival in cefiderocol-treated rabbits (87%) was greater than that in TMP-SMX-treated (25%; P < 0.05) and UC (0%; P < 0.05) groups. There was no residual bacterial burden in lung tissue or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in the cefiderocol group. Residual bacterial burden was present in lung tissue and BAL fluid in the TMP-SMX group but was decreased in comparison to UCs (P < 0.001). Lung weights (markers of pulmonary injury) were decreased in cefiderocol-treated versus TMP-SMX (P < 0.001) and UC (P < 0.001) groups. Cefiderocol is highly active in treatment of experimental S. maltophilia pneumonia, laying the foundation for future clinical investigations against this lethal infection in immunocompromised patients.

Characterization of the Bacteriophage BUCT603 and Therapeutic Potential Evaluation Against Drug-Resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in a Mouse Model

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) is a common opportunistic pathogen that is resistant to many antibiotics. Bacteriophages are considered to be an effective alternative to antibiotics for the treatment of drug-resistant bacterial infections. In this study, we isolated and characterized a phage, BUCT603, infecting drug-resistant S. maltophilia. Genome sequencing showed BUCT603 genome was composed of 44,912 bp (32.5% G + C content) with 64 predicted open reading frames (ORFs), whereas no virulence-related genes, antibiotic-resistant genes or tRNA were identified. Whole-genome alignments showed BUCT603 shared 1% homology with other phages in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database, and a phylogenetic analysis indicated BUCT603 can be classified as a new member of the Siphoviridae family. Bacteriophage BUCT603 infected 10 of 15 S. maltophilia and used the TonB protein as an adsorption receptor. BUCT603 also inhibited the growth of the host bacterium within 1 h in vitro and effectively increased the survival rate of infected mice in a mouse model. These findings suggest that bacteriophage BUCT603 has potential for development as a candidate treatment of S. maltophilia infection.

Overcoming Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Resistance for a More Rational Therapeutic Approach

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an underappreciated source of morbidity and mortality among gram-negative pathogens. Effective treatment options with acceptable toxicity profiles are limited. Phenotypic susceptibility testing via commercial automated test systems is problematic and no Food and Drug Administration breakpoints are approved for any of the first-line treatment options for S maltophilia. The lack of modern pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data for many agents impedes dose optimization, and the lack of robust efficacy and safety data limits their clinical utility. Levofloxacin has demonstrated similar efficacy to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, although rapid development of resistance is a concern. Minocycline demonstrates the highest rate of in vitro susceptibility, however, evidence to support its clinical use are scant. Novel agents such as cefiderocol have exhibited promising activity in preclinical investigations, though additional outcomes data are needed to determine its place in therapy for S maltophilia. Combination therapy is often employed despite the dearth of adequate supporting data.

In vitro Time Kill of Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia versus Escherichia coli using Cation Adjusted Muller Hinton Broth and ISO-Sensitest Broth

Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ) is considered the treatment of choice for infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia , but limited pharmacodynamic data are available to support current susceptibility breakpoints or guide optimal dosing. Time-kill studies using a TMP/SMZ concentration of 4/40 μg/mL were conducted to compare 4 S. maltophilia with 4 Escherichia coli having the same MICs (0.25/4.75-4/76 μg/mL) in cation adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB) and ISO-Sensitest™ broth (ISO). With the exception of the resistant isolates (4/76 μg/mL), which resulted in regrowth approaching control, TMP/SMZ displayed significantly greater killing for E. coli compared with S. maltophilia at each MIC. Against E. coli , mean changes at 24 hour were -4.49, -1.73, -1.59, and +1.83 log 10 colony forming units (CFU) for isolates with MICs of 0.25/4.75, 1/19, 2/39, and 4/74 μg/mL, respectively. The f AUC/MIC required for stasis, 1-log 10 , and 2-log 10 CFU reductions were 40.7, 59.5, and 86.3, respectively. In contrast, TMP/SMZ displayed no stasis or CFU reductions against any S. maltophilia regardless of MIC, and no pharmacodynamic thresholds were quantifiable. Observations were consistent in both CAMHB and ISO broth. These data add increasing evidence that current TMP/SMZ susceptibility breakpoints against S. maltophilia should be reassessed.

Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis Caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia—The First Case Report and Brief Review

Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis (XGP) represents a rare and severe pathology secondary to chronic urinary obstruction and recurrent infections. Commonly, this condition leads to loss of kidney function, and frequently, surgical approach is the only optional treatment. Proteus mirabilis and Escherichia coli are the most frequent pathogens associated with XGP. The actual changes in the pathogen’s characteristics increased the risk of newly acquired infections once considered opportunistic. Stenotrophomonas malthophilia is one of those agents more related to immunocompromised patients, presenting an increased incidence and modified antibiotic resistance profile in the modern era. This case report presents a healthy female patient with an underlying renal stone pathology diagnosed with XGP related to S. maltophilia urinary infection. After a complete biological and imagistic evaluation, the case was treated as pyonephrosis. Empirical antibiotic administration and a surgical approach were considered. A total nephrectomy was performed, but the patient’s condition did not improve. The patient’s status improved when specific antibiotics were administered based on the bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of drained perinephric fluid. Levofloxacin and Vancomycin were considered the optimal combination in this case. The histopathological examination revealed XGP secondary to chronic renal stone. The present study describes the first case of XGP related to an aerobic Gram-negative pathogen such as S. maltophilia, once considered opportunistic, in an apparently healthy female adult.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of AmpC β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. A previous guidance document focused on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Here, guidance is provided for treating AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-E), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.

METHODS

A panel of six infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections formulated questions about the treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections. Answers are presented as suggestions and corresponding rationales. In contrast to guidance in the previous document, published data on optimal treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections are limited. As such, guidance in this document is provided as "suggested approaches" based on clinical experience, expert opinion, and a review of the available literature. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment suggestions are provided, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Suggestions apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of September 17, 2021 and will be updated annually. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance-2.0/.

Minocycline Activity against Unusual Clinically Significant Gram-Negative Pathogens

The minocycline susceptibility of 3,856 isolates including Burkholderia, Achromobacter, Alcaligenes, Aeromonas, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from the SENTRY surveillance (2014 to 2019) were analyzed. The susceptibilities of these species (%S) were Achromobacter spp. (n = 411; 92.6%), Burkholderia cepacia species complex (n = 199; 85.9%), Aeromonas spp. (n = 127; 99.2%), Chryseobacterium spp. (n = 59; 94.9%), Alcaligenes faecalis (n = 42; 88.1%), and S. maltophilia (n = 2,287; 99.5%). These data suggest that minocycline is a useful treatment option for infections caused by unusual Gram-negative pathogens.

Antimicrobial Treatment Strategies for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A Focus on Novel Therapies

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an urgent global threat due to its increasing incidence and intrinsic antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic development has focused on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, and Acinetobacter, with approved antibiotics in recent years having limited activity for Stenotrophomonas. Accordingly, novel treatment strategies for Stenotrophomonas are desperately needed. We conducted a systemic literature review and offer recommendations based on current evidence for a treatment strategy of Stenotrophomonas infection.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteraemia: 61 cases in a tertiary hospital in Denmark

BACKGROUND

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen and a dreaded cause of bacteraemia with 30-day mortality rates ranging from 14 to 69%. The purpose of this cohort study was to evaluate outcomes of S. maltophilia bacteraemia, at Rigshospitalet, a tertiary hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark.

METHODS

We included all patients with a blood culture positive for S. maltophilia, from January 1, 2015 to April 1, 2020. We extracted data on antimicrobial susceptibility, treatment, central venous catheter intervention and severe haematological disease.

RESULTS

Sixty-one cases of S. maltophilia bacteraemia were identified. The overall 90-day mortality was 18%. Sixty percent of patients had a central venous catheter intervention performed. Seventy-nine percent of patients were treated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX). Patients with central venous catheter intervention had significantly better survival than those without (HR: 0.16 [95% CI: 0.03-0.73]). Severe haematological disease and patients, who received intensive care unit (ICU) care, were at higher risk of death than other patients (HR: 5.93 [95% CI: 1.18 - 29.94] and HR: 8.37 [95% CI: 1.79 - 39.20], respectively). We found no evidence that any antibiotic regime was superior with regard to 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find evidence to support a change in the current standard-of-care regimen of TMP/SMX and CVC removal. Larger clinical trials are needed to guide such recommendations.

Tigecycline in the Treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction

Tigecycline is a potential alternative to trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole in treating Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections due to its potent in vitro antimicrobial activity. Clinical evidence regarding the use of tigecycline in the treatment of S. maltophilia infections is scarce. In this study, we assessed the efficacy of tigecycline treating ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to S. maltophilia in comparison with fluoroquinolones.

Methods

This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients admitted between January 2017 and December 2020 with the diagnosis of VAP caused by S. maltophilia receiving either tigecycline or fluoroquinolones as the definitive therapy ≥ 48 h. Clinical outcomes including 28-day mortality, clinical cure and microbiological cure were analyzed.

Results

Of 82 patients with S. maltophilia VAP included, 46 received tigecycline, and 36 received fluoroquinolones; 70.7% of patients had polymicrobial pneumonia, and the appropriate empiric therapy was applied to only 14.6% of patients. The overall 28-day mortality was 39%. Compared with patients receiving fluoroquinolones, tigecycline therapy resulted in worse clinical cure (32.6% vs. 63.9%, p = 0.009) and microbiological cure (28.6% vs. 59.1%, p = 0.045), while there was no statistical difference between 28-day mortality (47.8% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.105) in the two groups. Similar results were also shown in the inverse probability of treatment weighted univariable regression model and multivariable regression model.

Conclusions

The standard dose of tigecycline therapy was associated with a lower clinical and microbiological cure rate but not associated with an increased 28-day mortality in patients with S. maltophilia VAP compared with fluoroquinolones. Considering the unfavorable clinical outcomes, we therefore recommend against using the standard dose of tigecycline in treating S. maltophilia VAP unless new clinical evidence emerges.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-021-00516-5.

Effect of high-dose sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim and glucocorticoid use on hyperkalemic event: A retrospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim causes hyperkalemia; however, the effect of sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim dose and co-administered glucocorticoids on hyperkalemia has not been clarified.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort, chart review study involving patients (>20 years) who were treated with sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim was conducted at Tokyo Women's Medical University, Medical Center East from June 2015 to May 2019. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify risk factors for hyperkalemia (serum potassium level > 5.5 mEq/L). Additionally, Kaplan-Meier curve analyzed the cumulative incidence of hyperkalemia focusing on sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim dose and concomitant use of glucocorticoids with mineralocorticoid activity.

RESULTS

Among 333 patients, 44 (13%) patients developed hyperkalemia associated with sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim use for over 49 (interquartile range; 17-233) days. We found associations between the time to hyperkalemia development and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim dose (hazard ratio 1.238, 95% confidence interval 1.147-1.338, p < 0.001) and glucocorticoid use (hazard ratio 0.678, 95% confidence interval 0.524-0.877, p = 0.003). Interestingly, the Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that the concomitant use of glucocorticoids did not attenuate the risk of hyperkalemia in patients receiving high-dose sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (p = 0.747), whereas concomitant use of glucocorticoids significantly reduced the risk of hyperkalemia in patients receiving non-high dose sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim is a significant predictor of hyperkalemia. The effect of glucocorticoids on hyperkalemia varies depending on the sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim dose.

StenoSCORE: Predicting Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bloodstream Infections in the Hematologic Malignancy Population

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with considerable mortality in the hematologic malignancy population. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is the treatment of choice; however, it is not routinely included in empirical treatment regimens, both because of its adverse event profile and the relative rarity of S. maltophilia infections. We developed a risk score to predict hematologic malignancy patients at increased risk for S. maltophilia BSI to guide early (TMP-SMX) therapy. Patients ≥12 years of age admitted to five hospitals between July 2016 and December 2019 were included. Two separate risk scores were developed, (i) a "knowledge-driven" risk score based upon previously identified risk factors in the literature in addition to variables identified by regression analysis using the current cohort, and (ii) a risk score based upon automatic variable selection. For both scores, discrimination (receiver operator characteristic [ROC] curves and C statistics) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and graphical calibration plots) were assessed. Internal validation was assessed using leave-one-out cross-validation. In total, 337 unique patients were included; 21 (6.2%) had S. maltophilia BSI. The knowledge-driven risk score (acute leukemia, absolute neutrophil count category, mucositis, central line, and ≥3 days of carbapenem therapy) had superior performance (C statistic = 0.75; 0.71 after cross-validation) compared to that of the risk score utilizing automatic variable selection (C statistic = 0.63; 0.38 after cross-validation). A user-friendly risk score incorporating five variables easily accessible to clinicians performed moderately well to predict hematologic malignancy patients at increased risk for S. maltophilia BSI. External validation using a larger cohort is necessary to create a refined risk score before broad clinical application.

Clinical outcomes of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection treated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, minocycline, or fluoroquinolone monotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The historical treatment of choice for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection is trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and this is primarily based on preclinical studies. The objective of this study was to examine the clinical outcomes of patients receiving monotherapy with different agents.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adult patients receiving monotherapy for S. maltophilia infection with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), a fluoroquinolone, or minocycline from 2010 to 2016. The primary outcome was clinical failure, a composite of recurrence, alteration of therapy due to adverse reaction or concern for clinical failure, or 30-day in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. To account for treatment selection bias, multivariate regression and propensity score weighting were conducted.

RESULTS

284 patients were included (217 received TMP/SMX, 28 received a fluoroquinolone, and 39 received minocycline). The TMP/SMX and minocycline groups appeared to include similar patients whereas the fluoroquinolone group appeared to represent a slightly less severely ill population. Clinical failure was similar between groups (36%, 29%, and 31% in the TMP/SMX, fluoroquinolone, and minocycline groups, respectively, P=0.69) as was 30-day mortality (15%, 7%, and 5% in the TMP/SMX, fluoroquinolone, and minocycline groups, respectively, P=0.16). After controlling for confounding factors, receipt of minocycline (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=0.2 [0.1-0.7]) but not a fluoroquinolone (adjusted OR=0.3 [0.1 to 2.1]) was associated with lower mortality compared with TMP/SMX. This association persisted after propensity score weighting.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes were similar or better with alternatives to TMP/SMX monotherapy, which indicates this may not be the treatment of choice for infections caused by S. maltophilia.

In which cases of pneumonia should we consider treatments for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia?

BACKGROUND

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a pathogen commonly associated with respiratory infection. However, the characteristics of pneumonia caused by S. maltophilia remain unknown.

AIM

To evaluate the characteristics of and risk factors for S. maltophilia pneumonia.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation was undertaken of 2002 patients with sputum cultures positive for S. maltophilia between January 2010 and December 2019. Cases were excluded based on clinical information and laboratory results. Included cases were divided into two groups: the S. maltophilia pneumonia group (patients with pneumonia caused by S. maltophilia) and the non-S. maltophilia pneumonia group (patients with pneumonia caused by pathogens other than S. maltophilia). Patient characteristics, clinical data and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were compared between the groups.

FINDINGS

Eight and 91 patients were assigned to the S. maltophilia pneumonia and non-S. maltophilia pneumonia groups, respectively. The median age was significantly lower in the S. maltophilia pneumonia group than in the non-S. maltophilia pneumonia group (63.4 vs 73.1 years; P<0.01), and the SOFA score was significantly higher in the S. maltophilia pneumonia group (7.5 vs 3.0; P<0.01). Underlying malignancy and pre-administration of antipseudomonal β-lactams and steroids were confirmed in seven of the eight cases in the S. maltophilia pneumonia group, suggesting an association with immunosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumonia due to S. maltophilia is a rare occurrence. Treatment for this pathogen should be considered in cases of pneumonia with: (1) predominance of S. maltophilia in sputum cultures; (2) pre-administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics; (3) immunodeficiency; and (4) a high SOFA score.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infections in adult recipients of umbilical cord blood transplantation

Limited data are available on Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infections (SM-BSIs) and the therapeutic efficacy of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) against SM-BSI in umbilical cord blood transplant (uCBT) recipients. Medical and microbiological records of adult patients who received uCBTs between December 2008 and December 2015 at Toranomon Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) were reviewed. The efficacy and safety of SXT were evaluated only for recipients who were treated with ≥7 days of intravenous SXT for SM-BSI (evaluation cohort). Of 561 uCBT recipients, 34 developed SM-BSI. Diabetes mellitus (P = .005) and age ≥ 60 years (P = .013) were significant independent risk factors for SM-BSI. Moreover, SM-BSI was identified as an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality up to 100 days following uCBT (P = .025). Of the 34 recipients with SM-BSI, 24 were treated with an intravenous SXT-containing regimen (iSXT-CR). Septic shock (P = .0021), pneumonia (P = .011), neutropenia (P = .0015), and systemic steroid administration (P = .018) were identified as significant independent risk factors for 7-day crude mortality. The evaluation cohort included nine recipients. Doses of SXT were 2.4 to 6.9 mg/kg/day of the trimethoprim component. Of the nine recipients, five developed SM-BSI during the pre-engraftment phase. The 30-day crude-mortality rate and clinical cure rate of the cohort were 22% and 67%, respectively. Only one of the nine recipients experienced significant neutrophil toxicity. In this study, the epidemiology of SM-BSI in uCBT recipients was determined and its negative impact on survival was demonstrated. A low- to moderate-dose iSXT-CR appeared to be a tolerable and important therapeutic option for SM-BSI in the uCBT setting, including during the pre-engraftment phase.

Effectiveness of short vs long-course perioperative antibiotics in lung transplant recipients with donor positive respiratory cultures

Lung transplant recipients are at increased risk for infection in the early postoperative phase, thus perioperative antibiotics are employed. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of short- vs long-course perioperative antibiotics in lung transplant patients. Lung transplant patients with donor positive cultures between August 2013 and September 2019 were evaluated, excluding those with cystic fibrosis, death within 14 days and re-transplants. The primary outcome was 30-day freedom from donor-derived respiratory infection. A total of 147 patients were included (57 short vs 90 long-course). Median perioperative antibiotic duration was 6 days in the short-course vs 14 days in the long-course group (P < .0001). Thirty-day freedom from donor-derived respiratory infection was present in 56 (98%) patients in the short-course vs 85 (94%) patients in the long-course group (P = .41). There was no difference in development of Clostridioides difficile infections (P = .41), while cumulative ventilator time and time to post-op extubation were longer in the long-course group (P = .001 and .004, respectively). Among lung transplant recipients with positive donor respiratory cultures, short-course perioperative antibiotics were as effective as long-course antibiotics in preventing donor-derived bacterial respiratory infections.

A mouse model of rapidly progressive fatal haemorrhagic pneumonia caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

OBJECTIVES

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia causes severe haemorrhagic pneumonia with a reported mortality rate of 100%. However, currently there are no available mouse models of haemorrhagic pneumonia. In the present study, we generated a mouse model of haemorrhagic pneumonia and subjected the animals to treatment with levofloxacin and moxifloxacin to determine whether this model can be used to determine therapeutic effects.

METHODS

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was transtracheally administered to mice immunosuppressed with cyclophosphamide. We confirmed the pathological status of the S. maltophilia isolate and assessed whether the therapeutic effects of quinolone antibiotics could be studied using the model. Levofloxacin and moxifloxacin were administered to evaluate survival rate, bacterial load in the lungs and cardiac blood, as well as pathological changes in diseased lungs compared with those of the control group.

RESULTS

Haemorrhagic pneumonia developed within 16-24 h after bacterial infection and was confirmed pathologically. Levofloxacin and moxifloxacin significantly improved survival rates, decreased the bacterial load in lungs and cardiac blood, and improved haemorrhagic pneumonia as indicated by pathological examination.

CONCLUSIONS

We established a mouse model of rapidly progressive fatal haemorrhagic pneumonia caused by S. maltophilia that is useful for determining the therapeutic effect of various agents. We believe that this model will prove useful to further elucidate the mechanisms underlying haemorrhagic pneumonia as well as in the design and development of novel therapeutic modalities and targets.

Antimicrobial Activity of Aztreonam-Avibactam and Comparator Agents When Tested against a Large Collection of Contemporary Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates from Medical Centers Worldwide

Aztreonam-avibactam was tested against 1,839 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates collected worldwide and demonstrated potent activity against isolates from all geographic regions and infection types (overall MIC_50/90, 4/4 mg/liter; 97.8% inhibited at ≤8 mg/liter). Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) (MIC_50/90, ≤0.5/1 mg/liter; 95.4% susceptible) and minocycline (MIC_50/90, 0.5/2 mg/liter; 99.5% susceptible) were also very active. Aztreonam-avibactam inhibited 84.7% of non-TMP-SMX-susceptible isolates at ≤8 mg/liter. Aztreonam-avibactam may represent a valuable option for the treatment of S. maltophilia infections, addressing a major unmet medical need.

Activity of Cefiderocol Alone and in Combination with Levofloxacin, Minocycline, Polymyxin B, or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole against Multidrug-Resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

The production of an L1 metallo-β-lactamase and an L2 serine active-site β-lactamase precludes the use of β-lactams for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. Preclinical data suggest that cefiderocol is the first approved β-lactam with reliable activity against S. maltophilia, but data on strains resistant to current first-line agents are limited, and no studies have assessed cefiderocol-based combinations. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the in vitro activity of cefiderocol alone and in combination with levofloxacin, minocycline, polymyxin B, or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) against a collection of highly resistant clinical S. maltophilia isolates. For this purpose, the MICs of cefiderocol, ceftazidime, levofloxacin, minocycline, polymyxin B, and TMP-SMZ for 37 S. maltophilia isolates not susceptible to levofloxacin and/or TMP-SMZ were determined. Nine strains with various cefiderocol MICs were then tested in time-kill experiments with cefiderocol alone and in combination with comparators. The only agents for which susceptibility rates exceeded 40% were cefiderocol (100%) and minocycline (97.3%). Cefiderocol displayed the lowest MIC50 and MIC90 values (0.125 and 0.5 mg/liter, respectively). In time-kill experiments, synergy was observed when cefiderocol was combined with levofloxacin, minocycline, polymyxin B, or TMP-SMZ against 4/9 (44.4%), 6/9 (66.7%), 5/9 (55.5%), and 6/9 (66.7%) isolates, respectively. These data suggest that cefiderocol displays potent in vitro activity against S. maltophilia, including strains resistant to currently preferred agents. Future dynamic and in vivo studies of cefiderocol alone and in combination are warranted to further define cefiderocol's synergistic capabilities and its place in therapy for S. maltophilia infections.

Genetic Variants of the DSF Quorum Sensing System in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Influence Virulence and Resistance Phenotypes Among Genotypically Diverse Clinical Isolates

The pathogenicity of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is regulated in part by its quorum sensing (QS) system. The main QS signaling molecule in S. maltophilia is known as diffusible signal factor (DSF), and the rpf gene cluster is responsible for its synthesis and perception. Two cluster variants have been previously described, rpf-1 and rpf-2, which differ basically in the conditions under which DSF is produced. Here, correlations between the rpf variant and antibiotic susceptibility, LPS electrophoretic profiles and virulence-related phenotypes were evaluated for a collection of 78 geographically and genetically diverse clinical strains of S. maltophilia. In general there were associations between previously established genogroups and the genetic variant of the rpf cluster. However, only few genotype-phenotype correlations could be observed. Resistance to the β-lactam antibiotics ceftazidime and ticarcillin was associated with strains carrying the rpf-1 variant, whereas strains of variant rpf-2, particularly those of genogroup C, showed higher resistance levels to colistin. Strains of variant rpf-2 were also significantly more virulent to Galleria mellonella larvae than those of rpf-1, most likely due to an increased ability of rpf-2 strains to form biofilms. A comparative genomic analysis revealed the presence of proteins unique to individual genogroups. In particular, the strains of genogroup C share an operon that encodes for a new virulence determinant in S. maltophilia related to the synthesis of an alternative Flp/Tad pilus. Overall, this study establishes a link between the DSF-based QS system and the virulence and resistance phenotypes in this species, and identifies potential high-risk clones circulating in European hospitals.

Activity of Potential Alternative Treatment Agents for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates Nonsusceptible to Levofloxacin and/or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is difficult to treat due to the production of multiple intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of resistance. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) and the fluoroquinolones have traditionally been considered the drugs of choice but are plagued by increasing resistance and adverse drug effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activities of 12 clinically relevant antimicrobials against clinical S. maltophilia isolates nonsusceptible to levofloxacin and/or TMP-SMZ. A diverse panel of 41 clinical S. maltophilia isolates collected through the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program from 2008 to 2018 was evaluated against ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, chloramphenicol, delafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, eravacycline, minocycline, omadacycline, polymyxin B, and tigecycline. MICs were determined in triplicate via reference broth microdilution and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines where available. MIC distributions and susceptibilities were also compared across infection type, acquisition setting, and geographic origin. Susceptibilities to levofloxacin and TMP-SMZ were 29.3% and 36.6%, respectively. Minocycline displayed the highest susceptibility rate overall (92.7%) and the lowest MIC₉₀ value (4 mg/liter) of any of the 12 agents tested. Only 3 isolates were resistant to levofloxacin, TMP-SMZ, and minocycline. Polymyxin B and tigecycline were the second most active agents. No significant differences were observed in MIC distributions across the 3 strata evaluated. These data demonstrate that few antimicrobials, old or new, maintain reliable activity against resistant S. maltophilia The role of minocycline in the treatment of infections due to S. maltophilia warrants further clinical investigation given its potent in vitro activity and favorable adverse effect profile.

Stenotrophomonas Bacteremia Antibiotic Susceptibility and Prognostic Determinants: Mayo Clinic 10-Year Experience

Background

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a gram-negative, opportunistic infection that is usually hospital-acquired and associated with high morbidity and mortality. The reported increase in S. maltophilia infections is presumed to be due to an increase in the population at risk.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 10-year data for S. maltophilia bacteremia in hospitalized adults at our institution to determine the population at risk, sources of infection, common complications, antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, and clinical outcome trends over the past decade.

Results

Among the 98 patients analyzed, the most common source of infection was catheter-related (62, 63.3%). Most isolates (61, 65%) were resistant to ceftazidime; fewer were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX; 2, 2.1%) and levofloxacin (22, 23.4%). All-cause in-hospital mortality was 29.6% (29 patients). The highest mortality, 53.8%, was observed in pulmonary sources of bacteremia.

Conclusions

Although TMP-SMX continues to have reliable activity in our cohort, we noted resistance to TMP-SMX in patients with recent TMP-SMX exposure, including a case with developing resistance to TMP-SMX while on therapy.

First report of survival in two patients with hematologic malignancy and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia hemorrhagic pneumonia treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-based combination antibiotic therapy

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has become a common cause of opportunistic infections in immunocompromised hosts and critical care patients. The most common disease manifestations are pneumonia and bacteremia, with a mortality ranging from 9% to 60.5% depending of the type of infection and host related underlying risk factors. Patients with hematological malignancies may develop a hemorrhagic pneumonia with a rapidly progressive and universally fatal disease course, despite appropriate treatment with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or combination therapy. We report the first two patients with hematologic malignancies and hemorrhagic pneumonia due to S. maltophilia with successful treatment outcomes after early institution of combination therapy with TMP/SMX, polymyxin, and/or moxifloxacin.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: Clinical characteristics in a military trauma population

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a pathogen with unique resistance patterns. We assessed 70 combat casualties with S. maltophilia clinical isolates to examine its role as a nosocomial pathogen in critically-ill trauma patients. Incidence density was 0.36 S. maltophilia infections per 100 patient-days (95% CI: 0.29-0.44). Patients predominantly had blast trauma (97%) and were critically injured (injury severity score [ISS] >25; 80%). Restricting to patients with ISS >15, 50 patients with S. maltophilia infections were compared to 441 patients with infections attributed to other gram-negative bacilli. Patients with S. maltophilia infections had significantly more operating room visits prior to isolation, traumatic or early surgical amputations, longer hospitalization (median 71 vs 47 days), and higher overall mortality (10% vs 2%; P = 0.01). Initial and serial (≥7 days between initial and subsequent isolation) S. maltophilia isolates had high susceptibility to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and minocycline. Evaluation of newer agents awaiting CLSI breakpoints, including moxifloxacin, showed promising results.

In Vitro Activity of Minocycline against U.S. Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii-Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Species Complex, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Burkholderia cepacia Complex: Results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 2014 to 2018

We evaluated the activity of minocycline and comparator agents against a large number of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 1,289), Acinetobacter baumannii-Acinetobacter calcoaceticus species complex (n = 1,081), and Burkholderia cepacia complex (n = 101) isolates collected from 2014 to 2018 from 87 U.S. medical centers spanning all 9 census divisions. The isolates were collected primarily from hospitalized patients with pneumonia (1,632 isolates; 66.0% overall), skin and skin structure infections (354 isolates; 14.3% overall), bloodstream infections (266 isolates; 10.8% overall), urinary tract infections (126 isolates; 5.1% overall), intra-abdominal infections (61 isolates; 2.5% overall), and other infections (32 isolates; 1.3% overall). Against the A. baumannii-A. calcoaceticus species complex, colistin was the most active agent, exhibiting MIC_50/90 values at ≤0.5/2 μg/ml and 92.4% susceptibility. Minocycline ranked second in activity, with MIC_50/90 values at 0.25/8 μg/ml and susceptibility at 85.7%. Activity for these two agents was reduced against extensively drug-resistant and multidrug-resistant isolates of the Acinetobacter baumannii-Acinetobacter calcoaceticus species complex. Only two agents showed high levels of activity (susceptibility, >90%) against S. maltophilia, minocycline (MIC_50/90, 0.5/2 μg/ml; 99.5% susceptible) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (MIC_50/90, ≤0.5/1 μg/ml; 94.6% susceptible). Minocycline was active against 92.8% (MIC₉₀, 4 μg/ml) of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant S. maltophilia isolates. Various agents exhibited susceptibility rates of nearly 90% against the B. cepacia complex isolates; these were trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (MIC_50/90, ≤0.5/2 μg/ml; 93.1% susceptible), ceftazidime (MIC_50/90, 2/8 μg/ml; 91.0% susceptible), meropenem (MIC_50/90, 2/8 μg/ml; 89.1% susceptible), and minocycline (MIC_50/90, 2/8 μg/ml; 88.1% susceptible). These results indicate that minocycline is among the most active agents for these three problematic potential pathogen groups when tested against U.S. isolates.

Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes in Patients with Monomicrobial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen observed in nosocomial infections. Due to biofilm production and resistance to numerous antimicrobials, eradication is difficult. This study evaluated outcomes for monomicrobial S. maltophilia infections. Seventy-six patients were included, with 45 patients on trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and 31 patients on levofloxacin. Overall clinical cure, microbiological eradication, and 28-day mortality were observed in 79%, 82%, and 14% of patients, respectively. The use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or levofloxacin resulted in high cure rates; however, a trend toward resistance selection with levofloxacin was identified.

Comparative In Vivo Antibacterial Activity of Human-Simulated Exposures of Cefiderocol and Ceftazidime against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in the Murine Thigh Model

Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin that utilizes bacterial ferric iron transports to cross the outer membrane. Cefiderocol shows high stability against all classes of β-lactamases, rendering it extremely potent against carbapenem- and multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms. Using a neutropenic murine thigh model, we compared the efficacies of human-simulated exposures of cefiderocol (2 g Q8H 3 h infusion) and ceftazidime (2 g Q8H 2 h infusion) against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, an emerging opportunistic Gram-negative organism associated with serious and often fatal nosocomial infections. Twenty-four S. maltophilia isolates were studied, including isolates resistant to ceftazidime, trimethoprim-sulfate, and/or levofloxacin. The thighs were inoculated with bacterial suspensions of 10⁸ CFU/mL and the human-simulated regimens were administered over 24 h. Efficacy was measured as the change in log₁₀CFU/thigh at 24 h compared with 0 h controls. Cefiderocol human-simulated exposure demonstrated potent bacterial killing; mean bacterial reduction at 24 h was -2.67 ± 0.68 log₁₀CFU/thigh with ≥ 2 log-reduction achieved in 21 isolates (87.5%) and ≥ 1 log-reduction achieved in the remaining three isolates (12.5%). In comparison, ceftazidime human-simulated exposure produced mean bacterial reduction of -1.38 ± 1.49 log₁₀CFU/thigh among 10 ceftazidime-susceptible isolates and mean bacterial growth of 0.64 ± 0.79 log₁₀CFU/thigh among 14 ceftazidime-non-susceptible isolates. While ceftazidime showed modest efficacy against most susceptible isolates, humanized cefiderocol exposures resulted in remarkable in vivo activity against all S. maltophilia isolates examined, inclusive of ceftazidime-non-susceptible isolates. The potent in vitro and in vivo activity of cefiderocol supports the development of this novel compound for managing S. maltophilia infections.

Treatment Outcomes of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia in Critically Ill Children: A Multicenter Experience

OBJECTIVES

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a gram-negative opportunistic bacterium that may cause a myriad of clinical diseases in immunocompromised individuals. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, risk factors, mortality, and treatment of S. maltophilia bacteremia in critically ill children, a topic on which data are sparse.

DESIGN

A multicenter observational retrospective study in which medical charts of critically ill children with S. maltophilia bacteremia were reviewed between 2012 and 2017.

SETTING

Data were collected from each of the four largest PICUs nationwide, allocated in tertiary medical centers to which children with complex conditions are referred regularly.

PATIENTS

A total of 68 suitable cases of S. maltophilia bacteremia were retrieved and reviewed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The total occurrence rate of S. maltophilia isolation had increased significantly during the study period (r = 0.65; p = 0.02). The crude mortality was 42%, and the attributed mortality was 18%. Significant risk factors for mortality were a longer length of hospital stay prior to infection (33 d in nonsurvivors vs 28 in survivors; p = 0.03), a nosocomial source of infection (p = 0.02), presentation with septic shock (p < 0.001), and treatment with chemotherapy (p = 0.007) or carbapenem antibiotics (p = 0.05) prior to culture retrieval. On multivariate analysis, septic shock (odds ratio, 14.6; 95% CI, 1.45-147.05; p = 0.023) and being treated with chemotherapy prior to infection (odds ratio, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.59-17.19; p = 0.006)] were associated with mortality. The combination of ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and minocycline resulted in the longest survival time (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The significant attributed mortality associated with S. maltophilia bacteremia in critically ill children calls for an aggressive therapeutic approach. The findings of this investigation favor a combination of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, and minocycline.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii Complex and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Clinical Isolates: Results From the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-2016)

Background

Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-A. baumannii (Acb) complex and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia represent frequent causes of hospital-acquired infections. We evaluated the frequency and resistance rates of Acb complex and S. maltophilia isolates from medical centers enrolled in the SENTRY Program.

Methods

A total of 13 752 Acb complex and 6467 S. maltophilia isolates were forwarded to a monitoring laboratory by 259 participating sites from the Asia-Pacific region, Latin America, Europe, and North America between 1997 and 2016. Confirmation of species identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed using conventional methods and/or matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and the broth microdilution method, respectively. Antimicrobial susceptibility results were interpreted by CLSI and EUCAST 2018 criteria.

Results

Acb complex and S. maltophilia were most frequently isolated from patients hospitalized with pneumonia (42.9% and 55.8%, respectively) and bloodstream infections (37.3% and 33.8%, respectively). Colistin and minocycline were the most active agents against Acb complex (colistin MIC_50/90, ≤0.5/2 mg/L; 95.9% susceptible) and S. maltophilia (minocycline MIC_50/90, ≤1/2 mg/L; 99.5% susceptible) isolates, respectively. Important temporal decreases in susceptibility rates among Acb complex isolates were observed for all antimicrobial agents in all regions. Rates of extensively drug-resistant Acb complex rates were highest in Europe (66.4%), followed by Latin America (61.5%), Asia-Pacific (56.9%), and North America (38.8%). Among S. maltophilia isolates, overall trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) susceptibility rates decreased from 97.2% in 2001-2004 to 95.7% in 2013-2016, but varied according to the geographic region.

Conclusions

We observed important reductions of susceptibility rates to all antimicrobial agents among Acb complex isolates obtained from all geographic regions. In contrast, resistance rates to TMP-SMX among S. maltophilia isolates remained low and relatively stable during the study period.

Medical Management of Endocarditis Caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A Case Report

A 44-year-old female was found to be systemically ill at dialysis and admitted to the hospital. Days into the hospitalization, her blood cultures from dialysis were positive with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia with a levofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 1. She was discharged on ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally (PO) daily on hospital day 2 to complete a 14-day course. Weeks later, she was again found to be bacteremic at dialysis and sent back to the hospital. She was started on empiric antibiotics upon admission until further identification. Blood cultures again revealed S. maltophilia with a levofloxacin MIC of 32. Antibiotics were tailored to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) until susceptibilities for additional agents were available. Further workup revealed mitral valve endocarditis. She was subsequently discharged on both minocycline 100 mg PO every 12 hours and TMP-SMX 1 DS PO daily with a planned duration of 6 weeks. Due to ongoing readmissions for hyperkalemia, TMP-SMX was discontinued and her regimen was modified to ceftazidime 1 g intravenously (IV) after HD plus minocycline 100 mg PO every 12 hours. She was deemed clinically and microbiologically cleared based on follow-up assessments. To our knowledge, this is the first case of S. maltophilia endocarditis treated with oral minocycline in combination with another antibiotic.

Intraabdominal abscess caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia usually causes nosocomial infections, but intraabdominal abscesses or organ/space surgical site infection (SSI) secondary to this organism has been rarely reported. Here, we reported a rare case of SSI that presented as intraabdominal abscess caused by S. maltophilia.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 68-year-old woman presented to our hospital with transverse colon cancer. Further work up with abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed left renal cell carcinoma. Transverse colon resection and left kidney partial resection were performed. On post-operative day 10, she started to have fever at 38°C and repeat abdominal CT showed intraabdominal abscess. Empiric treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam (TAZ/PIPC) was initiated. However, fever persisted and the abscess size did not change despite 10 days of antibiotic. On post-operative day 20, drainage of intraabdominal abscess was performed. TAZ/PIPC was then shifted to meropenem (MEPM). After two days, S. maltophilia was identified in the culture of the abscess, and MEPM was shifted to minocycline (MINO). Fever disappeared after 7days of treatment and abdominal CT after 14 days showed almost complete resolution of the abscess.

DISCUSSION

S. maltophilia is a multi-drug resistant, aerobic, non-glucose fermenting, non-sporulating, Gram-negative bacillus. S. maltophilia may cause a variety of infections, but intraabdominal abscesses as a manifestation of SSI due to this organism is relative rare.

CONCLUSION

Although usually a non-pathogenic organism or colonizer, S. maltophilia can cause organ/space SSI in an immunocompromised host. Therefore, clinicians should be aware of the possibility that S. maltophilia may cause organ/space SSI.