An observational study of the universal use of octenidine to decrease nosocomial bloodstream infections and MDR organisms

Preoperative skin asepsis in bovine surgery: an outcome-blinded 3-arm randomized clinical trial under non-sterile operating room conditions

Background

Surgical site infections (SSI) following clean abdominal surgery in cattle pose significant economic and welfare concerns. Preoperative skin asepsis aims to minimize microbial load over the surgical field before and throughout surgery to minimize its risk. While chlorhexidine (CHX) and povidone-iodine (PVI) are commonly used antiseptics for this purpose, our study introduces the so far unexplored use of octenidine (OCT) in veterinary surgery.

Methods

We compared in a single-center, prospective, randomized, outcome-blinded, 3-arm trial the effectiveness of an OCT-based protocol to CHX- and PVI-based protocols. Cattle aged 2 years or older, needing a clean standing flank laparotomy (e.g., exploratory laparotomy, right flank omentopexy, left flank abomasopexy), were eligible. Exclusion criteria comprised skin abnormalities, recent antibiotic use, or debilitating conditions with systemic involvement or distant site infections. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 with concealed allocation using unique identifiers. Skin bacterial reduction (immediate [IRF] and delayed [DRF] reduction factors), SSI rate, and wound scores were evaluated. Wound scores were rated on a 0 to 6 scale, considering the presence and severity of discharge and swelling.

Results

Out of 373 assessed cattle, 126 were included and randomized: PVI (n = 42), CHX (n = 41), OCT (n = 43). All protocols significantly reduced bacterial counts, with PVI exhibiting lower IRF. No significant differences were observed in DRF. The summer season and duration of surgical procedures had a negative impact on IRF and DRF in all groups, respectively. Nine of 118 patients (7.6%) with complete follow-up developed SSI. Higher wound scores were associated with development of SSI. Wound scores ≥3 at day 10 postoperatively predicted SSI with high sensitivity and specificity. Microbial flora in SSI included typical skin bacteria and opportunistic pathogens.

Conclusion

All protocols met minimum FDA standards in reducing bacterial colonization. While limited by sample size and single-center design, this study confirms the OCT-based protocol as a valuable option for preoperative skin asepsis in clean abdominal bovine surgery.

Impact of daily octenidine skin washing versus nonwashing on antiseptic tolerance of coagulase-negative staphylococci in two neonatal intensive care units with different skin cleansing practices

Background

There is wide variation in practices regarding routine bathing/washing of babies in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Evidence is lacking as to the benefit of routine antiseptic washes for reducing infection. We aimed to compare the antiseptic tolerance of Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (CoNS) within two UK NICUs with very different approaches to skin washing.

Methods

We compared antiseptic susceptibility of CoNS isolated from skin swabs of neonates admitted to the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (NNUH) NICU in December 2017-March 2018 with those isolated in the Bradford Royal Infirmary (BRI) NICU in January-March 2020. The NNUH does not practise routine whole-body washing whereas BRI practises daily whole-body washing from post-menstrual age 27 weeks using Octenisan wash lotion (0.3% octenidine; 1 minute contact time before washing off with sterile water). A total of 78 CoNS isolates from BRI and 863 from the NNUH were tested for susceptibility against the antiseptics octenidine (OCT) and chlorhexidine (CHX).

Results

Isolates from the BRI with practice of routine washing did not show increased antiseptic tolerance to OCT or CHX. Isolates from the NNUH which does not practise routine whole-body washing and rarely uses octenidine, were comparatively less susceptible to both CHX and OCT antiseptics.

Conclusions

Daily whole-body skin washing with OCT does not appear to select for CoNS isolates that are antiseptic tolerant towards OCT and CHX. There remains considerable uncertainty about the impact of different antiseptic regimes on neonatal skin microbiota, the benefit of routine washing, and the development of antiseptic tolerance in the NICU.

Efficacy of octenidine- and chlorhexidine-based wash-mitts against Candida albicans and Candida auris - a comparative study

BACKGROUND

Management of outbreaks of the newly emerging pathogen Candida auris may include use of antimicrobial wash-mitts for decolonization. However, currently there is little clinical evidence to support the wide adoption of 'whole-body decolonization' as part of the protocol to effectively manage C. auris outbreaks. The aim of this study was to investigate the chemical tolerance of C. auris compared with the surrogate test organism Candida albicans as established in the European Standards (EN).

METHODS

Two commercially available antiseptic-impregnated wash-mitts based on either chlorhexidine digluconate (CHG) or octenidine dihydrochloride (OCT) were studied. Comparison of susceptibility of C. auris and C. albicans was investigated based on the standardized test protocol EN 13624. Experiments were conducted using the impregnation liquid squeezed from the wash-mitts at a contact time of 30 s at different concentrations between 0.5% and 97% in the presence of low organic soiling.

FINDINGS

Yeasticidal efficacy according to EN 13624 was found for the OCT wash-mitts at 30 s at ≥10% concentration with C. albicans. In comparison, reduction ≥4 log10 was found at a much lower concentration of ≥1% for both C. auris strains. For the CHG wash-mitts, efficacy against C. albicans was below 2 log10 reduction at 97% concentration within 30 s. Efficacy against the two C. auris strains was around 3 log10 reduction.

CONCLUSION

Both C. auris strains were found to be significantly more susceptible when compared with C. albicans. Data also demonstrate that not all antiseptic-impregnated wash-mitts are equally effective against C. auris with OCT having a higher efficacy compared with CHG.

Enhancing Photostability of Complex Lead Halides through Modification with Antibacterial Drug Octenidine

The high power-conversion efficiencies of hybrid perovskite solar cells encourage many researchers. However, their limited photostability represents a serious obstacle to the commercialization of this promising technology. Herein, we present an efficient method for improving the intrinsic photostability of a series of commonly used perovskite material formulations such as MAPbI3, FAPbI3, Cs0.12FA0.88PbI3, and Cs0.10MA0.15FA0.75PbI3 through modification with octenidine dihydroiodide (OctI2), which is a widely used antibacterial drug with two substituted pyridyl groups and two cationic centers in its molecular framework. The most impressive stabilizing effects were observed in the case of FAPbI3 and Cs0.12FA0.88PbI3 absorbers that were manifested in significant suppression or even blocking of the undesirable perovskite films' recrystallization and other decomposition pathways upon continuous 110 mW/cm2 light exposure. The achieved material photostability-within 9000 h for the Oct(FA)n-1PbnI3n+1 (n = 40-400) and 20,000 h for Oct(Cs0.12FA0.88)n-1PbnI3n+1 (where n = 40-400) formulations-matches the highest values ever reported for complex lead halides. It is important to note that the stabilizing effect is maintained when OctI2 is used only as a perovskite surface-modifying agent. Using a two-cation perovskite composition as an example, we showed that the performances of the solar cells based on the developed Oct(Cs0.12FA0.88)399Pb400I1201 absorber material are comparable to that of the reference devices based on the unmodified perovskite composition. These findings indicate a great potential of the proposed approach in the design of new highly photostable and efficient light absorbers. We believe that the results of this study will also help to establish important guidelines for the rational material design to improve the operational stability of perovskite solar cells.

Application of Octenidine into Nasal Vestibules Does Not Influence SARS-CoV-2 Detection via PCR or Antigen Test Methods

The targeted or universal decolonization of patients through octenidine for nasal treatment and antiseptic body wash for 3 to 5 days prior elective surgery has been implemented in several surgical disciplines in order to significantly reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) caused by Staphylococcus aureus carriage. However, as most healthcare facilities also screen patients on admission for pilot infection, it is imperative that a prophylactic nasal decolonization procedure not yield a false negative SARS-CoV-2 status in otherwise positive patients. We assessed the effect of a commercially available octenidine-containing nasal gel on two different screening methods-antigen (Ag) detection based on colloidal gold immunochromatography and RT-PCR-in a prospective-type accuracy pilot study in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive inpatients. All patients still showed a positive test result after using the octenidine-containing nasal gel for about 3 days; therefore, its application did not influence SARS-CoV-2 screening, which is of high clinical relevance. Of note is that Ag detection was less sensitive, regardless of the presence of octenidine. From an infection prevention perspective, these results favor octenidine-based decolonization strategies, even during seasonal SARS-CoV-2 periods. As only asymptomatic patients are considered for elective interventions, screening programs based on RT-PCR technology should be preferred.

Central-line associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units before and after implementation of daily antiseptic bathing with chlorhexidine or octenidine: a post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUNDS

Antiseptic bathing did not reduce central-line (CL) associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates in intensive care units (ICU) according to a recent cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT). However, this analysis did not consider baseline infection rates. Our post-hoc analysis of this cRCT aimed to use a before-after comparison to examine the effect of daily bathing with chlorhexidine, octenidine or water and soap (control) on ICU-attributable CLABSI rates.

METHODS

A post-hoc analysis of a multi-center cRCT was done. ICUs that did not yet perform routine antiseptic bathing were randomly assigned to one of three study groups applying daily bathing with 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated cloths, 0.08% octenidine wash mitts or water and soap (control) for 12 months. Baseline data was assessed 12 months before the intervention started when all ICUs routinely used water and soap. Poisson regression and generalised estimating equation models were applied to identify changes of CLABSI rates per 1000 CL days between intervention and baseline periods in each study group.

RESULTS

The cRCT was conducted in 72 ICUs (24 per study group) including 76,139 patients in the baseline and 76,815 patients in the intervention period. In the chlorhexidine group, incidence density of CLABSI was reduced from 1.48 to 0.90 CLABSI per 1000 CL days comparing baseline versus intervention period (P = 0.0085). No reduction was observed in the octenidine group (1.26 versus 1.47 CLABSI per 1000 CL days, P = 0.8735) and the control group (1.20 versus 1.17, P = 0.3298). Adjusted incidence rate ratios (intervention versus baseline) were 0.63 (95%CI 0.46-0.87, P = 0.0172) in the chlorhexidine, 1.17 (95% CI 0.79-1.72, P = 0.5111) in the octenidine and 0.98 (95% CI 0.60-1.58, P = 0.9190) in the control group. Chlorhexidine bathing reduced CLABSI with gram-positive bacteria, mainly coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS).

CONCLUSIONS

In this post-hoc analysis of a cRCT, the application of 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated cloths reduced ICU-attributable CLABSI. This preventive effect of chlorhexidine was restricted to CLABSI caused by gram-positive pathogens (CoNS). In contrast, 0.08% octenidine wash mitts did not reduce CLABSI rates in ICUs. Trial registration Registration number DRKS00010475, registration date August 18, 2016.

Clinical Evidence for the Use of Octenidine Dihydrochloride to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections and Decrease Staphylococcus aureus Carriage or Transmission-A Review

BACKGROUND

The antiseptic agent octenidine dihydrochloride (OCT) is used for skin preparation, for Staphylococcus aureus decolonization, and within bundles for the prevention of catheter-related or surgical site infections (SSIs). Here, we review the evidence for the effects of OCT from clinical studies.

METHODS

Review of studies published in the Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases until August 2022, performed in clinical settings and reporting on effects of OCT on S. aureus carriage/transmission, SSI prevention, and prevention of intensive care unit (ICU)-related or catheter-related bloodstream and insertion site infections.

RESULTS

We included 31 articles. The success of S. aureus decolonization with OCT-containing therapies ranged between 6 and 87%. Single studies demonstrated that OCT application led to a reduction in S. aureus infections, acquisition, and carriage. No study compared OCT for skin preparation before surgical interventions to other antiseptics. Weak evidence for the use of OCT for pre-operative washing was found in orthopedic and cardiac surgery, if combined with other topical measures. Mostly, studies did not demonstrate that daily OCT bathing reduced ICU-/catheter-related bloodstream infections with one exception.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to perform studies assessing the clinical use of OCT compared with other antiseptics with respect to its effectiveness to prevent nosocomial infections.

ICU infection surveillance can be based on electronic routine data: results of a case study

BACKGROUND

The surveillance of hospital-acquired infections in Germany is usually conducted via manual chart review; this, however, proves resource intensive and is prone to a certain degree of subjectivity. Documentation based on electronic routine data may present an alternative to manual methods. We compared the data derived via manual chart review to that which was derived from electronic routine data.

METHODS

Data used for the analyses was obtained from five of the University of Leipzig Medical Center's (ULMC) ICUs. Clinical data was collected according to the Protection against Infection Act (IfSG); documentation thereof was carried out in hospital information systems (HIS) as well as in the ICU-KISS module provided by the National Reference Center for the Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections (NRZ). Algorithmically derived data was generated via an algorithm developed in the EFFECT study; ward-movement data was linked with microbiological test results, generating a data set that allows for evaluation as to whether or not an infection was ICU-acquired.

RESULTS

Approximately 75% of MDRO cases and 85% of cases of sepsis/primary bacteremia were classified as ICU-acquired by both manual chart review and EFFECT. Most discrepancies between the manual and algorithmic approaches were due to differentiating definitions regarding the patients' time at risk for acquiring MDRO/bacteremia.

CONCLUSIONS

The concordance between manual chart review and algorithmically generated data was considerable. This study shows that hospital infection surveillance based on electronically generated routine data may be a worthwhile and sustainable alternative to manual chart review.

Chlorhexidine and octenidine susceptibility of bacterial isolates from clinical samples in a three-armed cluster randomised decolonisation trial

BACKGROUND

Routine use of chlorhexidine or octenidine for antiseptic bathing may have unintended consequences. Our analysis aimed to assess the phenotypic susceptibility of bacterial isolates from clinical samples to chlorhexidine and octenidine collected from intensive care units (ICU) that routinely used 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated wash cloths or 0.08% octenidine wash mitts (intervention) or water and soap (control) for daily patient care.

METHODS

This study was conducted within the context of a three armed cluster-randomised controlled decolonisation trial (Registration number DRKS00010475, registration date August 18, 2016). Bacterial isolates were collected prior to and at the end of a 12-month-intervention period from patients with ≥ 3 days length of stay at an ICU assigned to one of two intervention groups or the control group. Phenotypic susceptibility to chlorhexidine and octenidine was assessed by an accredited contract research laboratory determining minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) as percentage of extraction solutions used. MIC were reported as estimated concentrations in μg/ml derived from the chlorhexidine and octenidine extraction solutions. Statistical analyses including generalized estimating equation models were applied.

RESULTS

In total, 790 ICU-attributable bacterial isolates from clinical samples (e.g. blood, urine, tracheal aspirate) were eligible for all analyses. Pathogens included were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 155), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS, n = 122), Escherichia coli (n = 227), Klebsiella spp. (n = 150) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 136). For all species, chlorhexidine and octenidine MIC did not increase from baseline to intervention period in the antiseptic bathing groups. For proportions of bacterial isolates with elevated chlorhexidine / octenidine MIC (≥ species-specific chlorhexidine / octenidine MIC50), adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) showed no differences between the intervention groups and the control group (intervention period).

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence for reduced phenotypic susceptibilities of bacterial isolates from clinical samples to chlorhexidine or octenidine in ICUs 12 months after implementation of routine antiseptic bathing with the respective substances.

Evaluating the effectiveness of octenidine-containing wash mitts in reducing infections in intensive care

Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at a greater risk of developing hospital-acquired infections (HCAIs). Decontamination, which usually includes a regimen of body washing with an antimicrobial skin cleanser, is used to prevent HCAIs. Approaches can be: targeted, where carriers are identified and decontaminated; or universal, where all patients undergo a decontamination regimen. Universal rather than targeted decontamination is more effective at reducing infection rates and is more cost-effective. Decontamination in the ICU can lower HCAI rates across the entire hospital. Microbial resistance to chlorhexidine, however, which is the main active agent used for decontamination is increasing, and there are also adverse effects, leading to interest in octenidine as an alternative. This article explores the use of octenidine-containing single-use wash mitts in ICUs, which have been positively evaluated regarding antimicrobial activity, and ease and effectiveness of use.

Disruption of the Cytoplasmic Membrane Structure and Barrier Function Underlies the Potent Antiseptic Activity of Octenidine in Gram-Positive Bacteria

The antimicrobial killing mechanism of octenidine (OCT), a well-known antiseptic is poorly understood. We recently reported its interaction with Gram-negative bacteria by insertion of OCT into the outer and cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli, resulting in a chaotic lipid rearrangement and rapid disruption of the cell envelope. Its action primarily disturbs the packing order of the hydrophobic moiety of a lipid, which consequently might result in a cascade of multiple effects at a cellular level. Here, we investigated OCT's impact on two different Gram-positive bacteria, Enterococcus hirae and Bacillus subtilis, and their respective model membranes. In accordance with our previous results, OCT induced membrane disorder in all investigated model systems. Electron and fluorescence microscopy clearly demonstrated changes in cellular structure and membrane integrity. These changes were accompanied by neutralization of the surface charge in both E. hirae and B. subtilis and membrane disturbances associated with permeabilization. Similar permeabilization and disordering of the lipid bilayer was also observed in model membranes. Furthermore, experiments performed on strongly versus partly anionic membranes showed that the lipid disordering effect induced by OCT is a result of maximized hydrophobic over electrostatic forces without distinct neutralization of the surface charge or discrimination between the lipid head groups. Indeed, mutants lacking specific lipid head groups were also susceptible to OCT to a similar extent as the wild type. The observed unspecific mode of action of OCT underlines its broad antimicrobial profile and renders the development of bacterial resistance to this molecule less likely. IMPORTANCE OCT is a well-established antiseptic molecule routinely used in a large field of clinical applications. Since the spread of antimicrobial resistance has restricted the use of antibiotics worldwide, topically applied antiseptics like OCT, with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity and high safety profile, gain increasing importance for effective infection prevention and therapy. To eliminate a wide spectrum of disease-causing microorganisms, a compound's antiseptic activity should be unspecific or multitarget. Our results demonstrate an unspecific mechanism of action for OCT, which remained largely unknown for years. OCT disturbs the barrier function of a bacterial cell, a function that is absolutely fundamental for survival. Because OCT does not distinguish between lipids, the building blocks of bacterial membranes, its mode of action might be attributed to all bacteria, including (multi)drug-resistant isolates. Our results underpin OCT's potent antiseptic activity for successful patient outcome.

Successful control of Candida auris transmission in a German COVID-19 intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Candida auris is a frequently multi-drug resistant yeast species that poses a global health threat due to its high potential for hospital outbreaks. While C. auris has become endemic in parts of Asia and Africa, transmissions have so far rarely been reported in Western Europe except for Great Britain and Spain. We describe the first documented patient-to-patient transmission of C. auris in Germany in a COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) and infection control measures implemented to prevent further spread of the pathogen.

METHODS

Identification of C. auris was performed by MALDI-TOF and confirmed by internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing. Antifungal susceptibility testing was carried out. We conducted repeated cross-sectional examinations for the presence of C. auris in the patients of the affected ICU and investigated possible routes of transmission.

RESULTS

The index patient had been transferred to Germany from a hospital in Northern Africa and was found to be colonised with C. auris. The contact patient developed C. auris sepsis. Infection prevention and control (IPC) measures included strict isolation of the two C. auris patients and regular screening of non-affected patients. No further case occurred during the subsequent weeks. Reusable blades used in video laryngoscope-guided intubation were considered as the most likely vehicle of transmission.

CONCLUSIONS

In view of its high risk of transmission, vigilance regarding C. auris colonisation in patients referred from endemic countries is crucial. Strict and immediate IPC measures may have the potential to prevent C. auris outbreaks.

Infection prevention requirements for the medical care of immunosuppressed patients: recommendations of the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO) at the Robert Koch Institute

In Germany, guidelines for hygiene in hospitals are given in form of recommendations by the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention, "KRINKO"). The KRINKO and its voluntary work are legitimized by the mandate according to § 23 of the Infection Protection Act (Infektionsschutzgesetz, "IfSG"). The original German version of this document was published in February 2021 and has now been made available to the international professional public in English. The guideline provides recommendations on infection prevention and control for immunocompromised individuals in health care facilities. This recommendation addresses not only measures related to direct medical care of immunocompromised patients, but also management aspects such as surveillance, screening, antibiotic stewardship, and technical/structural aspects such as patient rooms, air quality, and special measures during renovations.

Effect of antiseptic bathing with chlorhexidine or octenidine on central-line associated bloodstream infections in intensive care patients: a cluster-randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Our study aimed to compare the effect of daily bathing with chlorhexidine, octenidine or water and soap (routine care = control) on central-line (CL) associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates in intensive care units (ICUs).

METHODS

A multi-center cluster-randomised controlled trial was done with a 12-months intervention period from February 1, 2017, to January 31, 2018 (octenidine and routine care group) or from June 1, 2017 to May 31, 2018 (chlorhexidine group). Wards were randomly assigned to one of two decolonisation regimes or routine care (control). Intervention included daily bathing with 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated cloths or 0.08% octenidine wash mitts for 12 months, while the control group used water and soap (routine care). The primary outcome was incidence density of CLABSI per 1,000 CL days. Poisson regression and generalised estimating equation models (GEE) were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 72 ICUs with 76,815 patients (22,897 patients in the chlorhexidine group, 25,127 in the octenidine group and 28,791 in the routine care group) were included. Incidence densities were 0.9 CLABSI per 1,000 CL days (95%CI 0.67 - 1.19) in the chlorhexidine group, 1.47 (95%CI 1.17 - 1.81) in the octenidine group and 1.17 (95%CI 0.93 - 1.45) in the routine care group. Adjusted incidence rate ratios of CLABSI were 0.69 (95%CI 0.37-1.22, p=0.25) in the chlorhexidine and 1.22 (95%CI 0.54-2.75, p=0.63) in the octenidine group (compared with routine care).

CONCLUSION

Antiseptic bathing with 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated cloths and 0.08% octenidine wash mitts lack a significant preventive effect on CLABSI rates in ICUs. However, our trial has a high likelihood of being underpowered as CLABSI rates in the routine care group were approximately 40% lower than initially assumed. This trial is registered with the German register for clinical trials (18/08/2016, number DRKS00010475).

Co-Lateral Effect of Octenidine, Chlorhexidine and Colistin Selective Pressures on Four Enterobacterial Species: A Comparative Genomic Analysis

Bacterial adaptation to antiseptic selective pressure might be associated with decreased susceptibility to antibiotics. In Gram-negative bacteria, some correlations between reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine (CHX) and polymyxins have been recently evidenced in Klebsiella pneumoniae. In the present study, four isolates belonging to distinct enterobacterial species, namely K. pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca and Enterobacter cloacae, were submitted to in-vitro selective adaptation to two antiseptics, namely CHX and octenidine (OCT), and to the antibiotic colistin (COL). Using COL as selective agent, mutants showing high MICs for that molecule were recovered for E. cloacae, K. pneumoniae and K. oxytoca, exhibiting a moderate decreased susceptibility to CHX, whereas OCT susceptibility remained unchanged. Using CHX as selective agent, mutants with high MICs for that molecule were recovered for all four species, with a cross-resistance observed for COL, while OCT susceptibility remained unaffected. Finally, selection of mutants using OCT as selective molecule allowed recovery of K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca and E. cloacae strains showing only slightly increased MICs for that molecule, without any cross-elevated MICs for the two other molecules tested. No E. coli mutant with reduced susceptibility to OCT could be obtained. It was therefore demonstrated that in-vitro mutants with decreased susceptibility to CHX and COL may be selected in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca and E. cloacae, showing cross-decreased susceptibility to COL and CHX, but no significant impact on OCT efficacy. On the other hand, mutants were difficult to obtain with OCT, being obtained for K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae only, showing only very limited decreased susceptibility in those cases, and with no cross effect on other molecules. Whole genome sequencing enabled deciphering of the molecular basis of adaptation of these isolates under the respective selective pressures, with efflux pumps or lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis being the main mechanisms of adaptation.

Antibacterial effects of Octenicept, and benzalkonium chloride on Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated from clinical samples and determination of genetic diversity of isolates by RAPD-PCR method

BACKGROUND

Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) is among the important causes of nosocomial infections. Due to the emergence of antibiotic resistance, many problems have been raised in the successful treatment of patients infected by this bacterium with the subsequent mortality. Therefore, the present study was performed to evaluate the antibacterial effect of Octenicept (OCT), and Benzalkonium chloride (BZK) against A. baumannii strains isolated from clinical samples, and to determine the genetic diversity of strains by RAPD-PCR method.

METHODS

A total of 119 A. baumannii isolates were collected and confirmed by conventional culture and biochemical tests and PCR assay. Susceptibility of the isolates to antibiotics was evaluated by standard antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST). For antiseptics OCT and BZK, Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was assessed by broth microdilution method. The prevalence of qacE and qacΔE1 genes related to antiseptics was estimated by PCR assay. Finally, genetic diversity of strains was determined by using RAPD-PCR.

RESULTS

All 119 suspected isolates were confirmed as A. baumannii using conventional microbiologic tests and PCR assay. The isolates were mostly originated from blood samples. In AST, the lowest resistance was seen for ciprofloxacin and gentamicin. For antiseptics, the MIC values were reported as 15.26 μg/ml for OCT and 640 μg/ml for BZK. The antiseptic genes of qacE and qacΔE1 were found to be present in 56 (47.05%) and 59 (49.57%) of isolates respectively. RAPD typing revealed great diversity among A. baumannii isolates, with 37 clusters in isolates from ICU, of which 32 clusters were single and 5 were multiple.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the increase of resistance to antiseptics, it is of importance to monitor the susceptibility of A. baumannii to antiseptics and to promote antiseptic stewardship in hospitals. Furthermore, in this study great diversity was observed among A. baumannii isolates, which is important in understanding the molecular epidemiology of the outbreaks caused by this organism in the hospitals.

Effect of didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (DDAC)-impregnated washcloth wipe whole-body bathing on catheter-related bloodstream infections and central venous line-associated infections in adult intensive care units

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of daily whole-body bathing (WBB) using disposable washcloth wipes/caps impregnated with an antiseptic solution containing the quaternary ammonium base compound didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (DDAC).

METHODS

A prospective double-blind randomized crossover trial was conducted to compare WBB of adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with washcloth wipes/caps impregnated with either regular cleanser/shampoo or the antiseptic DDAC. The clinical trial was performed in a medical ICU (MICU) and a surgical ICU (SICU). The study period was divided into two 6-month intervals with alternating treatment regimens.

RESULTS

A total of 1540 ICU patients (total length of ICU stay 10 470 days) were included in the trial. Compared to controls, DDAC bathing was found to be associated with reduced incidence rates per 1000 patient days for central-venous-line-associated infections (CLAIs) caused by Gram-positive bacteria (GPB) from 16.39 (95%CI 13.1-20.3) in the control group to 7.28 (95%CI 5.2-9.9) in the intervention group (p 0.01). A stratified analysis by unit showed that the incidence rates of CLAI due to GPB were reduced by the intervention in both the MICU and the SICU from 21.2 (95%CI 15.8-27.7) to 9.3 (95%CI 5.8-14.1) (p < 0.01) and from 12.1 (95%CI 8.3-17.0) to 5.7 (95%CI 3.4-9.1) (p 0.01), respectively. There was a trend towards reduction in catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) and bloodstream infections (BSIs); however, this did not reach statistical significance due to carry-over effects and small numbers.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the growing need for new concepts to prevent and control healthcare-associated infections, DDAC may be a new and promising agent for WBB of ICU patients.

Intranasal octenidine for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers and universal octenidine bathing reduced MRSA acquisition in an acute-care general ward

In this quasi-experimental before-and-after study in a methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) high-prevalence acute-care dermatology ward from August 2016 to November 2018, patients admitted during intervention period who received additional topical intranasal octenidine were 63% less likely to acquire MRSA than those receiving universal daily octenidine bathing alone during baseline period (aOR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14-0.98).

Impact of formulary interventions on the minimum inhibitory concentration of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to mupirocin, chlorhexidine, and octenidine in a Singapore tertiary institution

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) decolonization is an effective measure to prevent clinical infection but resistance is a concern. We aim to evaluate the impact of mupirocin (MUP) ointment formulary removal, plateauing use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), and hospital-wide introduction of octenidine (OCT)-based products on the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of MRSA to MUP, CHG, and OCT in our hospital. A prevalence study was conducted at three time points (TP) on consecutive MRSA screening isolates to evaluate for their MICs to MUP, CHG, and OCT using broth microdilution sensititre plates and detection of the ileS-2 gene encoding high-level MUP resistance in 2013 (pre-intervention TP1; n = 160), 2016 (early post-intervention TP2; n = 99) and 2017 (late post-intervention TP3; n = 76). Statistical analyses were performed using Chi square test with reference from TP1. There was a significant improvement in MUP susceptibility (MIC < 4 mcg/ml) from 71.9% (TP1) to 86.9% (TP2; p = 0.006) to 88.2% (TP3; p = 0.007). The prevalence of MUP high-level resistance (MIC > 256 mcg/ml) reduced from 25.0% (TP1) to 12.1% (TP2; p = 0.014) to 5.3% (TP3; p = 0.001). Likewise, the prevalence of isolates harboring the ileS-2 gene decreased from 28.1% (TP1) to 18.2% (TP2; p = 0.072) to 9.2% (TP3; p = 0.002). OCT MIC range remains stable at 0.5 to 1 mcg/ml across all three TPs. The proportion of isolates with reduced CHG susceptibility (MIC ≥ 4 mcg/ml) increased over the three TPs from 23.1 to 27.2% (p = 0.45) to 42.1% (p = 0.003). Active formulary regulations have an impact on the resistance profile of MRSA and can be used as a strategy to preserve the MRSA decolonization armamentarium.

Intranasal octenidine and universal chlorhexidine bathing can reduce meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus acquisition in an extended care facility in Singapore

Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is prevalent in extended care facilities. We conducted a quasi-experimental before-after study in a 100-bed rehabilitation hospital, from January 2013 to June 2019. Universal chlorhexidine bathing was implemented throughout the period, with intranasal octenidine for MRSA colonizers added from September 2017. Interrupted time-series with segmented regression analysis revealed that after adjusting for at-admission MRSA colonization and hand hygiene compliance, a constant trend was observed pre implementation of intranasal octenidine (adjusted mean coefficient: 0.012; 95% confidence interval: -0.037 to 0.06), with an immediate decrease with implementation (-2.145; -0.248 to -0.002; P = 0.033), followed by a significant reduction in MRSA acquisition post implementation (-0.125; -0.248 to -0.002; P = 0.047).

The Antiseptic Octenidine Inhibits Langerhans Cell Activation and Modulates Cytokine Expression upon Superficial Wounding with Tape Stripping

Ideal agents for the topical treatment of skin wounds should have antimicrobial efficacy without negative influence on wound healing. Octenidine (OCT) has become a widely used antiseptic in professional wound care, but its influence on several components of the wound healing process remains unclear. In the present study, we have used a superficial wound model using tape stripping on human full-thickness skin ex vivo to investigate the influence of OCT on epidermal Langerhans cells (LCs) and cytokine secretion pattern of skin cells during wound healing in a model without disruption of the normal skin structure. Histological and immunofluorescence studies showed that OCT neither altered human skin architecture nor the viability of skin cells upon 48 hours of culture in unwounded or wounded skin. The epidermis of explants and LCs remained morphologically intact throughout the whole culture period upon OCT treatment. OCT inhibited the upregulation of the maturation marker CD83 on LCs and prevented their emigration in wounded skin. Furthermore, OCT reduced both pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators (IL-8, IL-33, and IL-10), while angiogenesis and growth factor mediators (VEGF and TGF-β1) remained unchanged in skin explant cultures. Our data provide novel insights into the host response to OCT in the biologically relevant environment of viable human (wounded) skin.

Reduction of nosocomial bloodstream infections and nosocomial vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium on an intensive care unit after introduction of antiseptic octenidine-based bathing

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) is emerging in German intensive care units (ICUs). On a 32-bed surgical ICU at a university hospital, increasing numbers of nosocomial cases occurred despite enforcement of hand hygiene and environmental disinfection.

AIM

To introduce universal octenidine-based bathing in order to reduce the burden of VRE.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and March 2014, patients were screened for VRE on admission and twice weekly. Active surveillance was undertaken for VRE infections and colonizations, and for bloodstream infections (BSI) with any pathogen. Intervention in this before-after study comprised of standardized octenidine-based bathing. Distinct subgroups of VRE colonizations or infections were defined and used for statistical analysis of frequency, prevalence and incidence density.

FINDINGS

In the pre-intervention period (January 2012 to April 2013), the admission prevalence of VRE was 4/100 patients and the mean incidence density of nosocomial cases was 7.55/1000 patient-days (PD). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis revealed prevalence of three vanA and two vanB clusters. In the post-intervention period (August 2013 to March 2014), the admission prevalence of VRE was 2.41/100 patients and the mean incidence density of nosocomial cases was 2.61/1000 PD [P = 0.001 (pre- vs post-intervention)]. Thirteen nosocomial VRE infections were identified in the pre-intervention period, compared with one nosocomial VRE infection in the post-intervention period. Incidence densities of BSI pre- and post-intervention were 2.98 and 2.06/1000 PD (P = 0.15), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The epidemiology of emerging VRE appeared as a complex mix of admitted cases and transmissions in small clusters, challenging infection control measures. The implementation of universal octenidine-based bathing combined with a standardized washing regime led to a significant reduction in nosocomial VRE.

Daily skin antisepsis and hygiene in the critically ill patient

Hygiene and skin care of patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are part of basic care. For some years there has been evidence of skin colonization by multiresistant gramnegative and grampositive pathogens. The increase in nosocomial infections due to multiresistant microorganisms has led to evaluation of the role of the use of antiseptics, mainly chlorhexidine, as a strategy for reducing the number of such infections. This article reviews the current situation of this strategy, as well as the positioning of the authors in relation to the spreading of its use in ICUs. This article is part of a supplement entitled "Antisepsis in the critical patient", which is sponsored by Becton Dickinson.

Intranasal octenidine and universal antiseptic bathing reduce methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence in extended care facilities

Intranasal octenidine, an antiseptic alternative to mupirocin, can be used for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) decolonisation in the prevention of nosocomial transmission. A controlled before-after study was conducted in three extended-care hospitals in Singapore. All inpatients with >48 h stay were screened for MRSA colonisation in mid-2015(pre-intervention) and mid-2016(post-intervention). Hospital A: universal daily chlorhexidine bathing throughout 2015 and 2016, with intranasal octenidine for MRSA-colonisers in 2016. Hospital B: universal daily octenidine bathing and intranasal octenidine for MRSA-colonisers in 2016. Hospital C: no intervention. In 2015, MRSA prevalence was similar among the hospitals (Hospital A: 38.5%, Hospital B: 48.1%, Hospital C: 43.4%, P = 0.288). From 2015 to 2016, MRSA prevalence reduced by 58% in Hospital A (Adj OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.89) and 43% in Hospital B (Adj OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.84), but remained similar in Hospital C (Adj OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.60-2.33), after adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, prior MRSA carriage, prior antibiotics exposure and length of hospital stay. Compared with the change in MRSA prevalence from 2015 to 2016 in Hospital C, MRSA prevalence declined substantially in Hospital A (Adj OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.97) and Hospital B (Adj OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.22-1.03). Topical intranasal octenidine, coupled with universal daily antiseptic bathing, can reduce MRSA colonisation in extended-care facilities.

EFFECT of daily antiseptic body wash with octenidine on nosocomial primary bacteraemia and nosocomial multidrug-resistant organisms in intensive care units: design of a multicentre, cluster-randomised, double-blind, cross-over study

INTRODUCTION

Nosocomial infections are serious complications that increase morbidity, mortality and costs and could potentially be avoidable. Antiseptic body wash is an approach to reduce dermal micro-organisms as potential pathogens on the skin. Large-scale trials with chlorhexidine as the antiseptic agent suggest a reduction of nosocomial infection rates. Octenidine is a promising alternative agent which could be more effective against Gram-negative organisms. We hypothesise that daily antiseptic body wash with octenidine reduces the risk of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired primary bacteraemia and ICU-acquired multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in a standard care setting.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

EFFECT is a controlled, cluster-randomised, double-blind study. The experimental intervention consists in using octenidine-impregnated wash mitts for the daily routine washing procedure of the patients. This will be compared with using placebo wash mitts. Replacing existing washing methods is the only interference into clinical routine.Participating ICUs are randomised in an AB/BA cross-over design. There are two 15-month periods, each consisting of a 3-month wash-out period followed by a 12-month intervention and observation period. Randomisation determines only the sequence in which octenidine-impregnated or placebo wash mitts are used. ICUs are left unaware of what mitts packages they are using.The two coprimary endpoints are ICU-acquired primary bacteraemia and ICU-acquired MDRO. Endpoints are defined based on individual ward-movement history and microbiological test results taken from the hospital information systems without need for extra documentation. Data on clinical symptoms of infection are not collected. EFFECT aims at recruiting about 45 ICUs with about 225 000 patient-days per year.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Leipzig (number 340/16-ek) in November 2016. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS-ID: DRKS00011282.

MRSA prevalence rates detected in a tertiary care hospital in Austria and successful treatment of MRSA positive patients applying a decontamination regime with octenidine

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) decontamination regimens predominantly use chlorhexidine bathing in combination with mupirocin nasal ointment. However, resistances in Staphylococcus aureus strains are increasingly common and there is a need of alternative, safe and feasible protocols. This interventional cohort study performed at the Albert Schweitzer Hospital in Graz, Austria, aimed to (1) determine MRSA prevalence at different body sites and (2) assess the efficacy of the decontamination using octenidine-based leave-on products added to existing robust infection control measures. All inpatients of this tertiary care hospital being treated in geriatric medical wards (GWs) and apallic care units (ACUs) were screened for MRSA and decontamination rates were determined after one, two or three decontamination cycles, respectively. At baseline, MRSA was detected in 25 of the 126 patients screened (19.8%). We found MRSA in 13/126 (10.3%) swabs from nasal vestibules, in 12/126 (9.5%) skin swabs, in 11/51 (21.6%) swabs from PEG-stomata or suprapubic catheters and in 8/13 (61.5%) tracheostomata swabs. A maximum of three 5-day decontamination cycles reduced the number of MRSA positive patients by 68.0%. Excluding non-compliant and deceased patients, decontamination reduced MRSA carriage by 93.3% (n = 15). No adverse events related to the applied decontamination regimen occurred. Exclusive screening of the nose might underreport MRSA prevalence rates. In this study, decontamination with octenidine-based leave-on products was safe and effective in a critical patient population.

Antimicrobial activity of octenidine against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens

Multidrug-resistant (MR) Gram-negative (GN) pathogens pose a major and growing threat for healthcare systems, as therapy of infections is often limited due to the lack of available systemic antibiotics. Well-tolerated antiseptics, such as octenidine dihydrochloride (OCT), may be a very useful tool in infection control to reduce the dissemination of MRGN. This study aimed to investigate the bactericidal activity of OCT against international epidemic clones of MRGN. A set of five different species (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) was studied to prove OCT efficacy without organic load, under "clean conditions" (0.3 g/L albumin) and under "dirty conditions" (3 g/L albumin + 3 mL/L defibrinated sheep blood), according to an official test norm (EN13727). We used five clonally unrelated isolates per species, including a susceptible wild-type strain, and four MRGN isolates, corresponding to either the 3MRGN or 4MRGN definition of multidrug resistance. A contact time of 1 min was fully effective for all isolates by using different OCT concentrations (0.01% and 0.05%), with a bacterial reduction factor of >5 log₁₀ systematically observed. Growth kinetics were determined with two different wild-type strains (A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae), proving a time-dependent efficacy of OCT. These results highlight that OCT may be extremely useful to eradicate emerging highly resistant Gram-negative pathogens associated with nosocomial infections.

Prolonged outbreak of clonal MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa on an intensive care unit: contaminated sinks and contamination of ultra-filtrate bags as possible route of transmission?

BACKGROUND

We report on an outbreak in a surgical, interdisciplinary intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital. We detected a cluster of ICU patients colonized or infected with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We established an outbreak investigation team, performed an exploratory epidemiological analysis and initiated an epidemiology-based intervention.

METHODS

As part of the outbreak investigation, we performed microbiological examinations of the sinks in the patient rooms and a retrospective case-control study. All patients admitted to the outbreak ICU between January 2012 and February 2014 were included. Cases were patients colonized with the outbreak strain. Controls were patients with a different Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain. Risk factors were evaluated using multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis. Strain typing was performed using the repetitive element-based polymerase chain reaction (rep-PCR) DiversiLab system.

RESULTS

The outbreak strain was found in the sinks of five (of 16) patient rooms. Altogether 21 cases and 21 (randomly selected) controls were included. In the univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in baseline data of the patients. In the multivariate analysis, stay in a room with a colonized sink (Odds Ratio[OR] 11.2, p = 0.007) and hemofiltration (OR 21.9, p = 0.020) were independently associated with an elevated risk for colonization or infection by the outbreak strain. In a subsequent evaluation of the work procedures associated with hemofiltration, we found that the ultra-filtrate bags had been on average five times per day emptied in the sinks of the patient rooms and were used multiple for the same patient. We exchanged the traps of the contaminated sinks and eliminated work procedures involving sinks in patient rooms by implementation of single use bags, which are emptied outside patient rooms to reduce splash water at the sinks. In the 20 month follow-up period, the outbreak strain was detected only once, which indicated that the outbreak had been ceased (incidence 0.75% vs. 0.04%, p < 0.001) Furthermore, the incidence of Pseudonomas aeruginosa overall was significantly decreased (2.5% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In ICUs, limiting work processes involving sinks results in reduced multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa rates. ICUs with high rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa should consider eliminating work processes that involve sinks and potentially splash water in close proximity to patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

All data were surveillance based data which were obtained within the German Law on Protection against Infection ("Infektionsschutzgesetz"). Therefore a trial registration was not required.

Effect of pre-operative octenidine nasal ointment and showering on surgical site infections in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of pre-operative octenidine (OCT) decolonization on surgical site infection (SSI) rates.

DESIGN

Before-and-after cohort study.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing an elective isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedure: control group (1^st January to 31^st December 2013), N=475; intervention group (1^st January to 31^st December 2014), N=428.

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention consisted of nasal application of OCT ointment three times daily, beginning on the day before surgery, and showering the night before and on the day of surgery with OCT soap.

RESULTS

A median sternotomy was performed in 805 (89.1%) patients and a minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass procedure was performed in 98 (10.9%) patients. Overall, there was no difference in SSI rates between the control and intervention groups (15.4% vs 13.3%, P=0.39). The rate of harvest site SSIs was significantly lower in patients in the intervention group (2.5% vs 0.5%, P=0.01). Patients who had undergone a median sternotomy in the intervention group had a significantly lower rate of organ/space sternal SSIs (1.9% vs 0.3%, P=0.04). However, there was a trend towards an increased rate of deep incisional sternal SSIs (1.2% vs 2.9%, P=0.08). Multi-variate analysis did not identify a significant protective effect of the intervention (odds ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.53-1.15, P=0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative decolonization with OCT did not reduce overall SSI rates in patients undergoing an elective isolated CABG procedure, but significantly decreased harvest site and organ/space sternal SSIs. Randomized controlled trials, including controlled patient adherence to the intervention, are required to confirm these observations and to determine the clinical utility of OCT in pre-operative decolonization.

[Multidrug resistant bacteria in the intensive care unit : Reasonable measures for prevention]

Multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria present an increasing threat for intensive care patients. Whereas colonization of intensive care patients with methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in German ICUs has remained at a constant level in recent years and therapeutic options have improved, colonization and infections with MDR gram-negative bacteria and vancomycin-resistant enterococci are increasing year by year. Only a few or even no therapeutic options remain for the treatment of these bacteria. If recommendations and guidelines for the prevention of transmission of MDR bacteria do exist they often are of moderate evidence due to lack of randomized controlled trials. The single most important measure to avoid transmission and infection with sensible and MDR bacteria is still hand disinfection. Screening and barrier precautions must be adapted and implemented to pathogen and local conditions. In addition to those specific measures universal decolonization with antiseptics have been demonstrated to be effective at least in intensive care patients.