Transphobia, encoded: an examination of trans-specific terminology in SNOMED CT and ICD-10-CM

Examining Scientific Inquiry of Queerness in Medical Education: A Queer Reading

Phenomenon. The language of medicine (i.e., biomedical discourse) represents queerness as pathological, yet it is this same discourse medical education researchers use to resist that narrative. To be truly inclusive, we must examine and disrupt the biomedical discourse we use. The purpose of this study is to disrupt oppressive biomedical discourses by examining the language and structures medical educators use in their publications about queerness in relation to physicians and physician trainees. Approach. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ERIC in October 2021 and again in June 2023 using a combination of controlled vocabulary (select terms designated by a database to enhance and reduce ambiguity in search) and keywords to identify articles related to sexuality, gender, identity, diversity and medical professionals. Searches were limited to articles published from 2013 to the present to align with the passage of The Respect for Marriage Act. Articles were included if they focused on the experiences and paths of physicians and physician trainees identifying with or embodying queerness, were authored by individuals based in the United States, and presented empirical studies. We excluded articles only discussing attitudes of cisgender heterosexual individuals about queerness. Two authors independently screened all articles for inclusion. We then used narrative techniques to "re-story" included articles into summaries, which we analyzed with four guiding questions, using queer theory as a sensitizing concept. Finally, we sought recurrent patterns in these summaries. Findings. We identified 2206 articles of which 23 were included. We found that biomedical discourse often: characterized individuals associated with queerness as a single homogenous group rather than as individuals with a breadth of identities and experiences; implied queer vulnerability without naming-and making responsible-the causes or agents of this vulnerability; and relied minimally on actual intervention, instead speculating on potential changes without attempting to enact them. Reflections. Authors each reflect on these findings from their positionalities, discussing: disrupting essentializing categories like "LGBT"; addressing harm through allyship around queerness; editorial responsibility to disrupt structures supporting oppressive biomedical discourse; the importance of program evaluation and interventions; and shifting the focus of medical education research toward queerness using QuantCrit theory.

Barriers to correct pronoun usage in healthcare settings

BACKGROUND

Using correct pronouns is an impactful way to establish affirming environments for transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) patients. However, physicians often report struggling with this.

OBJECTIVE

This study set out to conduct an initial root cause analysis of factors contributing to medical students and physicians failing to use TGNB patients' correct pronouns.

METHODS

A 10-item Qualtrics survey was sent to medical students, residents, and physicians practicing in Central Ohio. Participants were asked to describe perceived challenges or barriers colleagues have regarding correctly using TGNB patients' correct pronouns. A directed content analysis of participant responses was performed utilizing a fishbone diagram root cause analysis tool as a basis for conceptualizing and categorizing barriers. All coding was completed by independent reviewers utilizing a consensus reconciliation methodology.

RESULTS

Of 928 survey respondents, 763 met the study inclusion criteria, of which 453 provided analyzable responses. Of these 453, attendings with five or more years of practice (32.5%) and medical students (27.4%) made up the two largest demographic categories. 1.7% of respondents identified as transgender, nonbinary, and/or genderqueer, and 64% identified as heterosexual/straight. Five core barrier categories were identified: documentation, patient care, environment, knowledge, and individuals. Sub-categories were also identified, including lack of documentation, discomfort, medical culture, lack of standardization, prejudice, and assumptions.

CONCLUSION

The study identifies important barriers to medical professionals correctly using TGNB patients' pronouns. The root cause analysis conducted as part of this study demonstrates the necessity of multi-pronged, system-level interventions to support ensuring TGNB patients are addressed using the correct pronouns.

Factors Associated with Completeness of Sex and Gender Fields in Electronic Health Records

Purpose: Our purpose was to understand the completeness of sex and gender fields in electronic health record (EHR) data and patient-level factors associated with completeness of those fields. In doing so, we aimed to inform approaches to EHR sex and gender data collection. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study using 2016-2021 deidentified EHR data from a large health care system. Our sample included adults who had an encounter at any of three hospitals within the health care system or were enrolled in the health care system's Accountable Care Organization. The sex and gender fields of interest were gender identity, sex assigned at birth (SAB), and legal sex. Patient characteristics included demographics, clinical features, and health care utilization. Results: In the final study sample (N = 3,473,123), gender identity, SAB, and legal sex (required for system registration) were missing for 75.4%, 75.8%, and 0.1% of individuals, respectively. Several demographic and clinical factors were associated with having complete gender identity and SAB. Notably, the odds of having complete gender identity and SAB were greater among individuals with an activated patient portal (odds ratio [OR] = 2.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.66-2.70) and with more outpatient visits (OR = 4.34; 95% CI = 4.29-4.38 for 5+ visits); odds of completeness were lower among those with any urgent care visits (OR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.78-0.82). Conclusions: Missingness of sex and gender data in the EHR was high and associated with a range of patient factors. Key features associated with completeness highlight multiple opportunities for intervention with a focus on patient portal use, primary care provider reporting, and urgent care settings.

Improving radiology information systems for inclusivity of transgender and gender-diverse patients: what are the problems and what are the solutions? A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

In medical radiation science (MRS), radiology information systems (RISs) record patient information such as name, gender and birthdate. The purpose of RISs is to ensure the safety and well-being of patients by recording patient data accurately. However, not all RISs appropriately capture gender, sex or other related information of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) patients, resulting in non-inclusive and discriminatory care. This review synthesises the research surrounding the limitations of RISs preventing inclusivity and the features required to support inclusivity and improve health outcomes.

METHODS

Studies were retrieved from three electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed and Embase). A quality assessment was performed using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Research and Non-Research Evidence Appraisal Tools. A thematic analysis approach was used to synthesise the included articles.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles were included based on the predetermined eligibility criteria. The pool of studies included in this review comprised primarily of non-research evidence and reflected the infancy of this research field and the need for further empirical evidence. The key findings of this review emphasise how current systems do not record the patient's name and pronouns appropriately, conflate sex and gender and treat sex and gender as a binary concept.

CONCLUSION

For current systems to facilitate inclusivity, they must implement more comprehensive information and data models incorporating sex and gender and be more flexible to accommodate the transient and fluid nature of gender. However, implementation of these recommendations is not without challenges. Additionally, further research focused on RISs is required to address the unique challenges MRS settings present to TGD patients.

Causes of Death of Transgender and Gender Diverse Veterans

INTRODUCTION

Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) veterans face numerous challenges due to stigma and marginalization, which have a significant impact on their health and well-being. However, there is insufficient data on cause-specific mortality in TGD veteran populations in the U.S. The purpose of this study was to describe the leading causes of death in a sample of TGD veterans who received care from the Veterans Health Administration.

METHODS

A secondary data analysis was conducted using Veterans Health Administration electronic health record data matched with death certificate records from the National Death Index from October 1, 1999 to December 31, 2019. Using record axis codes from National Death Index data, the 25 most frequent underlying and all causes of death were summarized.

RESULTS

Deaths occurred in 1,415 TGD veterans. Ranking by any mention on the death certificate, mental and behavioral disorders due to psychoactive substance use (17.2%), conduction disorders and cardiac dysrhythmias (15.3%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (15.1%), diabetes mellitus (13.9%), and chronic ischemic heart disease (13.3%) were the top five causes of death. Three distinct methods of suicide appeared as the 7th (firearms), 17th (self-poisoning), and 24th (hanging) underlying causes of death for TGD veterans.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted prevention efforts or interventions to reduce the frequency and severity of causes of death, particularly mental and behavioral health disorders and metabolic disorders, could prevent premature mortality among TGD adults.

Opportunity to Integrate the American Medical Association's Inclusive Language Guidance

Inclusive language is a cornerstone for inclusive, just, and equitable health care. While the American Medical Association released inclusive language guidance in 2021, it was unclear the extent to which physician practice organizations and their affiliated journals have adopted and promoted inclusive language. In our analysis, we found a lack of inclusive language resources across many physician practice organizations and their affiliated journals. Moreover, when guidance was provided by such entities, it was sometimes limited or not reflective of the American Medical Association recommendations. As such, many practice organizations and their journals have the opportunity to promote inclusive language.

Analysis of Inclusive Gender, Sexuality and Sexual Orientation Data Elements in Academic Electronic Health Records

Findings from an analysis of three vended academic electronic health records used in health science education are presented in this article. The quality assurance project examined the lexical and semantic fit and content coverage of gender, sexuality, and sexual orientation data elements within the academic electronic health records. A semantic comparative content analysis using a cognitive walkthrough was conducted as a means of comparing the ideal set of gender, sexuality, and sexual orientation data elements with those found in the three vended academic electronic health records. The results indicated a need for alignment to the research literature, expert consensus, and technical standards similar to what is expected for electronic health records used in clinical practice because of a lack of ideal state data elements. The findings align with ongoing issues with bias and disparities seen in the care of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender population and a lack of diverse, inclusive media and teaching technologies in health science education. The quality project and findings can inform academic electronic health record vendors on how they can create more inclusive systems and bring awareness to healthcare educators about the potential for implicit and explicit bias in their teaching technologies.

A National Survey of United States-based Endocrinologists who Prescribe Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy

OBJECTIVE

The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) Standards of Care (SOC) Version 7 recommended that before initiating gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), patients should seek a psychosocial evaluation from a mental health professional documenting a diagnosis of persistent gender dysphoria. The Endocrine Society published guidelines in 2017 recommending against an obligatory psychosocial evaluation, which was affirmed in the recently published WPATH SOC Version 8 from 2022. Little is known about how endocrinologists ensure appropriate psychosocial assessment for their patients. This study assessed the protocols and characteristics of United States-based adult endocrinology clinics that prescribe GAHT.

METHODS

An anonymous electronic survey sent to members of a professional organization and the "Endocrinologists" Facebook group was responded to by 91 practicing board-certified adult endocrinologists who prescribe GAHT.

RESULTS

Thirty-one states were represented by the respondents. Overall, 83.1% of GAHT-prescribing endocrinologists reported accepting Medicaid. They reported working in university practices (28.4%), community practices (22.7%), private practices (27.3%), and other practice settings (21.6%). Overall, 42.9% of the respondents reported that their practice required documentation of a psychosocial evaluation from a mental health professional before initiating GAHT.

CONCLUSION

Endocrinologists who prescribe GAHT are divided about requiring a baseline psychosocial evaluation before prescribing GAHT. Further work is needed to understand the impact of psychosocial assessment on patient care and facilitate the uptake of new guidelines into clinical practice.

Digital Health Equity: Addressing Power, Usability, and Trust to Strengthen Health Systems

BACKGROUND

Without specific attention to health equity considerations in design, implementation, and evaluation, the rapid expansion of digital health approaches threatens to exacerbate rather than ameliorate existing health disparities.

METHODS

We explored known factors that increase digital health inequity to contextualize the need for equity-centered informatics. This work used a narrative review method to summarize issues about inequities in digital health and to discuss future directions for researchers and clinicians. We searched literature using a combination of relevant keywords (e.g., "digital health", "health equity", etc.) using PubMed and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

We have highlighted strategies for addressing medical marginalization in informatics according to vectors of power such as race and ethnicity, gender identity and modality, sexuality, disability, housing status, citizenship status, and criminalization status.

CONCLUSIONS

We have emphasized collaboration with user and patient groups to define priorities, ensure accessibility and localization, and consider risks in development and utilization of digital health tools. Additionally, we encourage consideration of potential pitfalls in adopting these diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-related strategies.

Transgender Individuals and Digital Health

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to assess the use of digital technologies to promote the health and well-being of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people.

RECENT FINDINGS

TGD individuals experience numerous health disparities, including low uptake of HIV prevention strategies, such as pre-exposure prophylaxis, increased HIV incidence, and suboptimal HIV-related outcomes. These health disparities are the result of widespread intersectional stigma on the basis of gender identity, gender expression, socioeconomic class, race, and ethnicity, which negatively impact access to general medical and transgender-specific health care. TGD individuals often delay or avoid essential medical services due to fear of discrimination. Clinicians frequently lack training, competence, and skills in transgender medicine, further exacerbating the health disparities faced by TGD people. Digital technologies have been used to improve research and clinical care for TGD populations through various modalities; telemedicine, telehealth and mHealth. Digital health technologies, including HIT-enabled clinical decision support, telehealth, telemedicine, and mHealth, offer innovative ways to improve health care access, improve quality of care, and reduce health disparities for TGD populations, including and beyond HIV outcomes, through enhanced care delivery, clinician education, and enhancing social support networks.

Pediatric sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in the electronic health record

The systematic documentation of sexual orientation and gender identity data in electronic health records can improve patient-centered care and help to identify and address health disparities affecting sexual and gender minority populations. Although there are existing guidelines for sexual orientation and gender identity data among adult patients, there are not yet standard recommendations for pediatric patients. In this article, we discuss methods that pediatric primary care organizations can use to collect and document sexual orientation and gender identity information with children and adolescents in electronic health records. These recommendations take into consideration children's developmental stages, the role of caregivers, and the need to protect the privacy of this information. We also focus on the current limitations of electronic health records in capturing the nuances of sexual and gender minority identities and make suggestions for addressing these limitations.