1
|
Baines R, Stevens S, Austin D, Anil K, Bradwell H, Cooper L, Maramba ID, Chatterjee A, Leigh S. Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e50421. [PMID: 38441944 PMCID: PMC10951832 DOI: 10.2196/50421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND International advances in information communication, eHealth, and other digital health technologies have led to significant expansions in the collection and analysis of personal health data. However, following a series of high-profile data sharing scandals and the emergence of COVID-19, critical exploration of public willingness to share personal health data remains limited, particularly for third-party or secondary uses. OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to explore factors that affect public willingness to share personal health data for third-party or secondary uses. METHODS A systematic search of 6 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and SocINDEX) was conducted with review findings analyzed using inductive-thematic analysis and synthesized using a narrative approach. RESULTS Of the 13,949 papers identified, 135 were included. Factors most commonly identified as a barrier to data sharing from a public perspective included data privacy, security, and management concerns. Other factors found to influence willingness to share personal health data included the type of data being collected (ie, perceived sensitivity); the type of user requesting their data to be shared, including their perceived motivation, profit prioritization, and ability to directly impact patient care; trust in the data user, as well as in associated processes, often established through individual choice and control over what data are shared with whom, when, and for how long, supported by appropriate models of dynamic consent; the presence of a feedback loop; and clearly articulated benefits or issue relevance including valued incentivization and compensation at both an individual and collective or societal level. CONCLUSIONS There is general, yet conditional public support for sharing personal health data for third-party or secondary use. Clarity, transparency, and individual control over who has access to what data, when, and for how long are widely regarded as essential prerequisites for public data sharing support. Individual levels of control and choice need to operate within the auspices of assured data privacy and security processes, underpinned by dynamic and responsive models of consent that prioritize individual or collective benefits over and above commercial gain. Failure to understand, design, and refine data sharing approaches in response to changeable patient preferences will only jeopardize the tangible benefits of data sharing practices being fully realized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Baines
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Sebastian Stevens
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
- Prometheus Health Technologies Ltd, Newquay, United Kingdom
| | - Daniela Austin
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hannah Bradwell
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Leonie Cooper
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | | | - Arunangsu Chatterjee
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Leigh
- Prometheus Health Technologies Ltd, Newquay, United Kingdom
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Conventry, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Terao M, Mittal N, Roth M, Saha A, Super L, Reichek J. Utilization of Teleconsent for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Clinical Trials, a Report from the Children's Oncology Group. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024; 13:132-137. [PMID: 37540127 PMCID: PMC10877395 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs, ages 15-39 years) are underrepresented in oncology clinical trials. Reasons for this include accessibility of the trial and whether the trial is presented to AYAs. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic not only amplified these enrollment challenges but also presented opportunities for improving the enrollment process through virtual methods such as electronic informed consent and teleconsent. While AYAs are well positioned to take advantage of these opportunities, the extent to which institutions utilize remote enrollment processes is unclear. The goal of this study was to identify the utilization of and barriers to using teleconsent for AYA oncology clinical trials. Methods: The Children's Oncology Group (COG) AYA Responsible Investigator (RI) Network Teleconsent Working Group sought to understand teleconsent utilization both before and during the pandemic. The working group developed an online survey distributed via email to COG AYA RI Network members (n = 197). Results: The survey received 49 responses (25%) from 40 different institutions. Before the pandemic, 13% of respondents reported that their institution allowed study enrollment via teleconsent. After the pandemic, 23% reported using teleconsent for clinical trial enrollment and 38% reported changes in institutional Review Board policies and procedures allowing teleconsent. Respondents reported that the greatest benefit of teleconsent was patient convenience and the greatest barrier was institutional restrictions on teleconsent utilization. Respondents reported that sharing institutional guidelines would be the most helpful intervention to improve teleconsent adoption. Conclusion: Teleconsent is a promising but underutilized approach. Institutions should work together to address common challenges to accessibility and acceptance of clinical trials by AYA cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Terao
- Office of Student Learning and Academic Advising, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Nupur Mittal
- Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Michael Roth
- Department of Pediatrics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Aniket Saha
- Department of Pediatrics, Prisma Health Upstate Children's Hospital, Greenville, South Carolina, USA
| | - Leanne Super
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Cancer Centre, Monash Children's Hospital and Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennifer Reichek
- Department of Pediatrics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leuchter RK, Ma S, Bell DS, Hays RD, Vidorreta FJS, Binder SL, Sarkisian CA. Embedding research study recruitment within the patient portal preCheck-in. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023; 30:2028-2035. [PMID: 37595575 PMCID: PMC10654868 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patient portals are increasingly used to recruit patients in research studies, but communication response rates remain low without tactics such as financial incentives or manual outreach. We evaluated a new method of study enrollment by embedding a study information sheet and HIPAA authorization form (HAF) into the patient portal preCheck-in (where patients report basic information like allergies). MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible patients who enrolled received an after-visit patient-reported outcomes survey through the patient portal. No additional recruitment/messaging efforts were made. RESULTS A total of 386 of 843 patients completed preCheck-in, 308 of whom signed the HAF and enrolled in the study (37% enrollment rate). Of 93 patients who were eligible to receive the after-visit survey, 45 completed it (48% completion rate). CONCLUSION Enrollment and survey completion rates were higher than what is typically seen with recruitment by patient portal messaging, suggesting that preCheck-in recruitment can enhance research study recruitment and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard K Leuchter
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024, United States
| | - Suzette Ma
- UCLA Health Information Technology, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| | - Douglas S Bell
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024, United States
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| | - Ron D Hays
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024, United States
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| | | | - Sandra L Binder
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States
| | - Catherine A Sarkisian
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024, United States
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90073, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eysenbach G, Hagens S, Kemp J, Roble H, Carter-Langford A, Shen N. Patient Perspectives and Preferences for Consent in the Digital Health Context: State-of-the-art Literature Review. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e42507. [PMID: 36763409 PMCID: PMC9960046 DOI: 10.2196/42507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing integration of digital health tools into care may result in a greater flow of personal health information (PHI) between patients and providers. Although privacy legislation governs how entities may collect, use, or share PHI, such legislation has not kept pace with digital health innovations, resulting in a lack of guidance on implementing meaningful consent. Understanding patient perspectives when implementing meaningful consent is critical to ensure that it meets their needs. Consent for research in the context of digital health is limited. OBJECTIVE This state-of-the-art review aimed to understand the current state of research as it relates to patient perspectives on digital health consent. Its objectives were to explore what is known about the patient perspective and experience with digital health consent and provide recommendations on designing and implementing digital health consent based on the findings. METHODS A structured literature search was developed and deployed in 4 electronic databases-MEDLINE, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, and Web of Science-for articles published after January 2010. The initial literature search was conducted in March 2021 and updated in March 2022. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they discussed electronic consent or consent, focused on the patient perspective or preference, and were related to digital health or digital PHI. Data were extracted using an extraction template and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS In total, 75 articles were included for analysis. Most studies were published within the last 5 years (58/75, 77%) and conducted in a clinical care context (33/75, 44%) and in the United States (48/75, 64%). Most studies aimed to understand participants' willingness to share PHI (25/75, 33%) and participants' perceived usability and comprehension of an electronic consent notice (25/75, 33%). More than half (40/75, 53%) of the studies did not describe the type of consent model used. The broad open consent model was the most explored (11/75, 15%). Of the 75 studies, 68 (91%) found that participants were willing to provide consent; however, their consent behaviors and preferences were context-dependent. Common patient consent requirements included clear and digestible information detailing who can access PHI, for what purpose their PHI will be used, and how privacy will be ensured. CONCLUSIONS There is growing interest in understanding the patient perspective on digital health consent in the context of providing clinical care. There is evidence suggesting that many patients are willing to consent for various purposes, especially when there is greater transparency on how the PHI is used and oversight mechanisms are in place. Providing this transparency is critical for fostering trust in digital health tools and the innovative uses of data to optimize health and system outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jessica Kemp
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Heba Roble
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Nelson Shen
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cumyn A, Ménard JF, Barton A, Dault R, Lévesque F, Ethier JF. Patients and Members of the Public’s Wishes Regarding Transparency in the Context of Secondary Use of Health Data: A Scoping Review (Preprint). J Med Internet Res 2022; 25:e45002. [PMID: 37052967 PMCID: PMC10141314 DOI: 10.2196/45002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Secondary use of health data has reached unequaled potential to improve health systems governance, knowledge, and clinical care. Transparency regarding this secondary use is frequently cited as necessary to address deficits in trust and conditional support and to increase patient awareness. OBJECTIVE We aimed to review the current published literature to identify different stakeholders' perspectives and recommendations on what information patients and members of the public want to learn about the secondary use of health data for research purposes and how and in which situations. METHODS Using PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, we conducted a scoping review using Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases to locate a broad range of studies published in English or French until November 2022. We included articles reporting a stakeholder's perspective or recommendations of what information patients and members of the public want to learn about the secondary use of health data for research purposes and how or in which situations. Data were collected and analyzed with an iterative thematic approach using NVivo. RESULTS Overall, 178 articles were included in this scoping review. The type of information can be divided into generic and specific content. Generic content includes information on governance and regulatory frameworks, technical aspects, and scientific aims. Specific content includes updates on the use of one's data, return of results from individual tests, information on global results, information on data sharing, and how to access one's data. Recommendations on how to communicate the information focused on frequency, use of various supports, formats, and wording. Methods for communication generally favored broad approaches such as nationwide publicity campaigns, mainstream and social media for generic content, and mixed approaches for specific content including websites, patient portals, and face-to-face encounters. Content should be tailored to the individual as much as possible with regard to length, avoidance of technical terms, cultural competence, and level of detail. Finally, the review outlined 4 major situations where communication was deemed necessary: before a new use of data, when new test results became available, when global research results were released, and in the advent of a breach in confidentiality. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights how different types of information and approaches to communication efforts may serve as the basis for achieving greater transparency. Governing bodies could use the results: to elaborate or evaluate strategies to educate on the potential benefits; to provide some knowledge and control over data use as a form of reciprocity; and as a condition to engage citizens and build and maintain trust. Future work is needed to assess which strategies achieve the greatest outreach while striking a balance between meeting information needs and use of resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annabelle Cumyn
- Département de médecine, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en informatique de la santé, Faculté des sciences/Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Jean-Frédéric Ménard
- Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en informatique de la santé, Faculté des sciences/Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Faculté de droit, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Adrien Barton
- Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en informatique de la santé, Faculté des sciences/Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Roxanne Dault
- Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en informatique de la santé, Faculté des sciences/Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Frédérique Lévesque
- Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en informatique de la santé, Faculté des sciences/Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Jean-François Ethier
- Département de médecine, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en informatique de la santé, Faculté des sciences/Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yusof MYPM, Teo CH, Ng CJ. Electronic informed consent criteria for research ethics review: a scoping review. BMC Med Ethics 2022; 23:117. [DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00849-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The research shows a growing trend in using an electronic platform to supplement or replace traditional paper-based informed consent processes. Instead of the traditionally written informed consent document, electronic informed consent (eConsent) may be used to assess the research subject’s comprehension of the information presented. By doing so, respect for persons as one of the research ethical principles can be upheld. Furthermore, these electronic methods may reduce potential airborne infection exposures, particularly during the pandemic, thereby adhering to the beneficence and nonmaleficence principle. This scoping review aims to identify the ethics related criteria that have been included in electronic informed consent processes and to synthesize and map these criteria to research ethics principles, in order to identify the gaps, if any, in current electronic informed consent processes.
Methods
The search was performed based on internet search and three main databases: PubMed, SCOPUS and EBSCO. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation guideline was used to report this work.
Results
Of 34 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 242 essential original constructs were collated, and 7 concepts were derived. Digital content showed the highest percentage of collated original constructs (27%, n = 65) followed by accessibility (24%, n = 56), comprehension engagement (18%, n = 43), autonomy (14%, n = 34), confidentiality (11%, n = 25), language (5%, n = 13), and parental consent (1%, n = 2). Twenty-five new items were synthesized for eConsent criteria which may provide guidance for ethical review of research involving eConsent.
Conclusion
The current study adds significant value to the corpus of knowledge in research ethics by providing ethical criteria on electronic informed consent based on evidence-based data. The new synthesized items in the criteria can be readily used as an initial guide by the IRB/REC members during a review process on electronic informed consent and useful to the future preparation of a checklist.
Collapse
|
7
|
Almeida-Magana R, Maroof H, Grierson J, Clow R, Dinneen E, Al-Hammouri T, Muirhead N, Brew-Graves C, Kelly J, Shaw G. E-Consent-a guide to maintain recruitment in clinical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic. Trials 2022; 23:388. [PMID: 35550639 PMCID: PMC9096749 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06333-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has posed daunting challenges when conducting clinical research. Adopting new technologies such as remote electronic consent (e-Consent) can help overcome them. However, guidelines for e-Consent implementation in ongoing clinical trials are currently lacking. The NeuroSAFE PROOF trial is a randomized clinical trial evaluating the role of frozen section analysis during RARP for prostate cancer. In response to the COVID-19 crisis, recruitment was halted, and a remote e-Consent solution was designed. The aim of this paper is to describe the process of implementation, impact on recruitment rate, and patients' experience using e-Consent. METHODS A substantial amendment of the protocol granted the creation of a remote e-Consent framework based on the REDCap environment, following the structure and content of the already approved paper consent form. Although e-Consent obviated the need for in-person meeting, there was nonetheless counselling sessions performed interactively online. This new pathway offered continuous support to patients through remote consultations. The whole process was judged to be compliant with regulatory requirements before implementation. RESULTS Before the first recruitment suspension, NeuroSAFE PROOF was recruiting an average of 9 patients per month. After e-Consent implementation, 63 new patients (4/month) have been enrolled despite a second lockdown, none of whom would have been recruited using the old methods given restrictions on face-to-face consultations. Patients have given positive feedback on the use of the platform. Limited troubleshooting has been required after implementation. CONCLUSION Remote e-Consent-based recruitment was critical for the continuation of the NeuroSAFE PROOF trial during the COVID-19 pandemic. The described pathway complies with ethical and regulatory guidelines for informed consent, while minimizing face-to-face interactions that increase the risk of COVID-19 transmission. This guide will help researchers integrate e-Consent to ongoing or planned clinical trials while uncertainty about the course of the pandemic continues. TRIAL REGISTRATION NeuroSAFE PROOF trial NCT03317990 . Registered on 23 October 2017. Regional Ethics Committee reference 17/LO/1978.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Almeida-Magana
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 3rd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TY, UK.
| | - Hanna Maroof
- Department of Urology, Westmoreland Street Hospital, University College London Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London, W1G 8PH, UK
| | - Jack Grierson
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 3rd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TY, UK
| | - Rosie Clow
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 3rd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TY, UK
| | - Eoin Dinneen
- Department of Urology, Westmoreland Street Hospital, University College London Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London, W1G 8PH, UK
| | - Tarek Al-Hammouri
- Department of Urology, Westmoreland Street Hospital, University College London Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London, W1G 8PH, UK
| | - Nicola Muirhead
- NCITA Clinical Trials Unit, Division of Medicine, University College London, Charles Bell House, 2nd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TY, UK
| | - Chris Brew-Graves
- NCITA Clinical Trials Unit, Division of Medicine, University College London, Charles Bell House, 2nd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TY, UK
| | - John Kelly
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, Charles Bell House, 3rd Floor, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TY, UK
- Department of Urology, Westmoreland Street Hospital, University College London Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London, W1G 8PH, UK
| | - Greg Shaw
- Department of Urology, Westmoreland Street Hospital, University College London Hospital, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London, W1G 8PH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kilgallon JL, Tewarie IA, Broekman MLD, Rana A, Smith TR. Passive Data Use for Ethical Digital Public Health Surveillance in a Postpandemic World. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e30524. [PMID: 35166676 PMCID: PMC8889482 DOI: 10.2196/30524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a fundamental need to establish the most ethical and effective way of tracking disease in the postpandemic era. The ubiquity of mobile phones is generating large amounts of passive data (collected without active user participation) that can be used as a tool for tracking disease. Although discussions of pragmatism or economic issues tend to guide public health decisions, ethical issues are the foremost public concern. Thus, officials must look to history and current moral frameworks to avoid past mistakes and ethical pitfalls. Past pandemics demonstrate that the aftermath is the most effective time to make health policy decisions. However, an ethical discussion of passive data use for digital public health surveillance has yet to be attempted, and little has been done to determine the best method to do so. Therefore, we aim to highlight four potential areas of ethical opportunity and challenge: (1) informed consent, (2) privacy, (3) equity, and (4) ownership.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John L Kilgallon
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Department of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ishaan Ashwini Tewarie
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Faculty of Medicine, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Marike L D Broekman
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Aakanksha Rana
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Timothy R Smith
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hentschel A, Hsiao CJ, Chen LY, Wright L, Shaw J, Du X, Flood-Grady E, Harle CA, Reeder CF, Francois M, Louis-Jacques A, Shenkman E, Krieger JL, Lemas DJ. Perspectives of Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women on Participating in Longitudinal Mother-Baby Studies Involving Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Study. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2021; 4:e23842. [PMID: 33666558 PMCID: PMC8080167 DOI: 10.2196/23842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic health records (EHRs) hold great potential for longitudinal mother-baby studies, ranging from assessing study feasibility to facilitating patient recruitment to streamlining study visits and data collection. Existing studies on the perspectives of pregnant and breastfeeding women on EHR use have been limited to the use of EHRs to engage in health care rather than to participate in research. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to explore the perspectives of pregnant and breastfeeding women on releasing their own and their infants' EHR data for longitudinal research to identify factors affecting their willingness to participate in research. METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with pregnant or breastfeeding women from Alachua County, Florida. Participants were asked about their familiarity with EHRs and EHR patient portals, their comfort with releasing maternal and infant EHR data to researchers, the length of time of the data release, and whether individual research test results should be included in the EHR. The interviews were transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were organized and coded using the NVivo 12 software (QSR International), and coded data were thematically analyzed using constant comparison. RESULTS Participants included 29 pregnant or breastfeeding women aged between 22 and 39 years. More than half of the sample had at least an associate degree or higher. Nearly all participants (27/29, 93%) were familiar with EHRs and had experience accessing an EHR patient portal. Less than half of the participants (12/29, 41%) were willing to make EHR data available to researchers for the duration of a study or longer. Participants' concerns about sharing EHRs for research purposes emerged in 3 thematic domains: privacy and confidentiality, transparency by the research team, and surrogate decision-making on behalf of infants. The potential release of sensitive or stigmatizing information, such as mental or sexual health history, was considered in the decisions to release EHRs. Some participants viewed the simultaneous use of their EHRs for both health care and research as potentially beneficial, whereas others expressed concerns about mixing their health care with research. CONCLUSIONS This exploratory study indicates that pregnant and breastfeeding women may be willing to release EHR data to researchers if researchers adequately address their concerns regarding the study design, communication, and data management. Pregnant and breastfeeding women should be included in EHR-based research as long as researchers are prepared to address their concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austen Hentschel
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Chu J Hsiao
- Department of Anthropology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Lynn Y Chen
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Lauren Wright
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jennifer Shaw
- Southcentral Foundation, Anchorage, AK, United States
| | - Xinsong Du
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Elizabeth Flood-Grady
- Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,STEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Christopher A Harle
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Callie F Reeder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Magda Francois
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Adetola Louis-Jacques
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Elizabeth Shenkman
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Janice L Krieger
- Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,STEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Dominick J Lemas
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jacquier E, Laurent-Puig P, Badoual C, Burgun A, Mamzer MF. Facing new challenges to informed consent processes in the context of translational research: the case in CARPEM consortium. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:21. [PMID: 33653311 PMCID: PMC7927247 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00592-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the context of translational research, researchers have increasingly been using biological samples and data in fundamental research phases. To explore informed consent practices, we conducted a retrospective study on informed consent documents that were used for CARPEM's translational research programs. This review focused on detailing their form, their informational content, and the adequacy of these documents with the international ethical principles and participants' rights. METHODS Informed consent forms (ICFs) were collected from CARPEM investigators. A content analysis focused on information related to biological samples and data treatment (context of sampling and collect, aims, reuse, consent renewal), including the type of consent. An automatic assessment of the readability of the ICFs were performed with the IT program "Flesch Score". RESULTS 29 ICFs from 25 of 49 studies were analyzed after selection criteria were applied. Three types of consent were identified: 11 broad consents, six specific consents, and two opt-out consents. The Flesch Scores showed that most of the documents were too complex to be fully understood by most of the potential research participants. Most of the biological samples were collected during the healthcare routine, but the information content about secondary use of biological samples varied between ICFs. All documents mentioned personal data treatment but information about their reuse was not standardized in the ICFs. CONCLUSIONS Our review of current IC procedures of CARPEM showed that practices could be improved considering new translational research methods. "Old fashion written ICFs" should be adapted to the translational research approach, to better respect individual rights and international research ethics principles. In this context, theoretically, a digital tool allowing dynamic information and consent of participants, through an electronic interactive platform may be a good way to promote more active participation in research. Nevertheless, its feasibility in the complex environment of biological samples and data research remains to prove. The way of a combination of a broad consent followed by dynamic information may be alternatively tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Jacquier
- Centre de Recherche Des Cordeliers (UMRS 1138), INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Team ETREs, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Pierre Laurent-Puig
- Centre de Recherche Des Cordeliers (UMRS 1138), Team Personalized Medicine, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Pharmacogenomics and Therapeutic Optimization, 75006 Paris, France
- Pharmacogénétique Et Oncologie Moléculaire, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Badoual
- Centre de Ressources Biologiques, Service d’anatomo-pathologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Anita Burgun
- Département D’informatique Médicale, de Biostatistique Et de Santé Publique, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- UMR-S 1138, Centre de Recherche Des Cordeliers, Paris, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France
| | - Marie-France Mamzer
- Centre de Recherche Des Cordeliers (UMRS 1138), INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Team ETREs, 75006 Paris, France
- Unité Fonctionnelle D’éthique Et Médecine Légale, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Maladies, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Andrews SM, Raspa M, Edwards A, Moultrie R, Turner-Brown L, Wagner L, Alvarez Rivas A, Frisch MK, Wheeler AC. "Just tell me what's going on": The views of parents of children with genetic conditions regarding the research use of their child's electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 27:429-436. [PMID: 31913479 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Revised: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to understand the ethical, legal, and social issues described by parents of children with known or suspected genetic conditions that cause intellectual and developmental disabilities regarding research use of their child's electronic health record (EHR). MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted 4 focus groups with parents of children with a known (n = 12) or suspected (n = 11) genetic condition, as well as 2 comparison groups with parents who had a child with no known genetic condition (n = 15). Focus group transcripts were coded and analyzed using directed content analysis. RESULTS After weighing the risks and benefits, parents of children with known or suspected genetic conditions were willing to share their child's EHR for research studies under certain conditions. Preferences were for studies conducted by universities or nonprofits that might benefit their child or others with the same condition. Parents also valued return of research results. DISCUSSION Trust, transparency, altruism, and concerns about privacy emerged as factors that affect parents' willingness to allow research use of their child's EHR. CONCLUSION Researchers should consider how to build trust with parents by increasing transparency of the research process and explaining specifically how they will ensure the confidentiality of EHR data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara M Andrews
- Center for Newborn Screening, Ethics, and Disability Studies, RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Melissa Raspa
- Center for Newborn Screening, Ethics, and Disability Studies, RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anne Edwards
- Center for Newborn Screening, Ethics, and Disability Studies, RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Lauren Turner-Brown
- TEACCH Autism Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laura Wagner
- Center for Communication Science, RTI International, Durham, NC
| | | | - Mary Katherine Frisch
- TEACCH Autism Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anne C Wheeler
- Center for Newborn Screening, Ethics, and Disability Studies, RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Golembiewski EH, Mainous AG, Rahmanian KP, Brumback B, Rooks BJ, Krieger JL, Goodman KW, Moseley RE, Harle CA. An Electronic Tool to Support Patient-Centered Broad Consent: A Multi-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial in Family Medicine. Ann Fam Med 2021; 19:16-23. [PMID: 33431386 PMCID: PMC7800739 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients are frequently asked to share their personal health information. The objective of this study was to compare the effects on patient experiences of 3 electronic consent (e-consent) versions asking patients to share their health records for research. METHODS A multi-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted from November 2017 through November 2018. Adult patients (n = 734) were recruited from 4 family medicine clinics in Florida. Using a tablet computer, participants were randomized to (1) a standard e-consent (standard), (2) an e-consent containing standard information plus hyperlinks to additional interactive details (interactive), or (3) an e-consent containing standard information, interactive hyperlinks, and factual messages about data protections and researcher training (trust-enhanced). Satisfaction (1 to 5), subjective understanding (0 to 100), and other outcomes were measured immediately, at 1 week, and at 6 months. RESULTS A majority of participants (94%) consented to future uses of their health record information for research. No differences in study outcomes between versions were observed at immediate or 1-week follow-up. At 6-month follow-up, compared with the standard e-consent, participants who used the interactive e-consent reported greater satisfaction (B = 0.43; SE = 0.09; P <.001) and subjective understanding (B = 18.04; SE = 2.58; P <.001). At 6-month follow-up, compared with the interactive e-consent, participants who used the trust-enhanced e-consent reported greater satisfaction (B = 0.9; SE = 1.0; P <.001) and subjective understanding (B = 32.2; SE = 2.6, P <.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients who used e-consents with interactive research details and trust-enhancing messages reported higher satisfaction and understanding at 6-month follow-up. Research institutions should consider developing and further validating e-consents that interactively deliver information beyond that required by federal regulations, including facts that may enhance patient trust in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arch G Mainous
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Kiarash P Rahmanian
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Babette Brumback
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Benjamin J Rooks
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Janice L Krieger
- Department of Advertising, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Kenneth W Goodman
- Institute for Bioethics and Health Policy, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Ray E Moseley
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Christopher A Harle
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Harle CA, Golembiewski EH, Rahmanian KP, Brumback B, Krieger JL, Goodman KW, Mainous AG, Moseley RE. Does an interactive trust-enhanced electronic consent improve patient experiences when asked to share their health records for research? A randomized trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 26:620-629. [PMID: 30938751 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 12/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the context of patient broad consent for future research uses of their identifiable health record data, we compare the effectiveness of interactive trust-enhanced e-consent, interactive-only e-consent, and standard e-consent (no interactivity, no trust enhancement). MATERIALS AND METHODS A randomized trial was conducted involving adult participants making a scheduled primary care visit. Participants were randomized into 1 of the 3 e-consent conditions. Primary outcomes were patient-reported satisfaction with and subjective understanding of the e-consent. Secondary outcomes were objective knowledge, perceived voluntariness, trust in medical researchers, consent decision, and time spent using the application. Outcomes were assessed immediately after use of the e-consent and at 1-week follow-up. RESULTS Across all conditions, participants (N = 734) reported moderate-to-high satisfaction with consent (mean 4.3 of 5) and subjective understanding (79.1 of 100). Over 94% agreed to share their health record data. No statistically significant differences in outcomes were observed between conditions. Irrespective of condition, black participants and those with lower education reported lower satisfaction, subjective understanding, knowledge, perceived voluntariness, and trust in medical researchers, as well as spent more time consenting. CONCLUSIONS A large majority of patients were willing to share their identifiable health records for research, and they reported positive consent experiences. However, incorporating optional additional information and messages designed to enhance trust in the research process did not improve consent experiences. To improve poorer consent experiences of racial and ethnic minority participants and those with lower education, other novel consent technologies and processes may be valuable. (An Interactive Patient-Centered Consent for Research Using Medical Records; NCT03063268).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher A Harle
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Regenstrief Institute Center for Biomedical Informatics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Kiarash P Rahmanian
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Babette Brumback
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Janice L Krieger
- Department of Advertising, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Kenneth W Goodman
- Institute for Bioethics and Health Policy, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Arch G Mainous
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Ray E Moseley
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Raspa M, Paquin RS, Brown DS, Andrews S, Edwards A, Moultrie R, Wagner L, Frisch M, Turner-Brown L, Wheeler AC. Preferences for Accessing Electronic Health Records for Research Purposes: Views of Parents Who Have a Child With a Known or Suspected Genetic Condition. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:1639-1652. [PMID: 33248520 PMCID: PMC7701359 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to examine parental preferences for researchers accessing their child's electronic health record across 3 groups: those with a child with (1) a known genetic condition (fragile X syndrome FXS), (2) a suspected genetic condition (autism spectrum disorder [ASD]), and (3) no known genetic condition (typically developing). METHODS After extensive formative work, a discrete choice experiment was designed consisting of 5 attributes, each with 2 or 3 levels, including (1) type of researcher, (2) the use of personally identifiable information, (3) the use of sensitive information, (4) personal importance of research, and (5) return of results. Stratified mixed logit and latent class conditional logit models were examined. RESULTS Parents of children with FXS or ASD had relatively higher preferences for research conducted by nonprofits than parents of typically developing children. Parents of children with ASD also preferred research using non-identifiable and nonsensitive information. Parents of children with FXS or ASD also had preferences for research that was personally important and returned either summary or individual results. Although a few child and family characteristics were related to preferences, they did not overall define the subgroups of parents. CONCLUSIONS Although electronic health record preference research has been conducted with the general public, this is the first study to examine the opinions of parents who have a child with a known or suspected genetic condition. These parents were open to studies using their child's electronic health record because they may have more to gain from this type of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Derek S Brown
- Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sara Andrews
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Anne Edwards
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | - Laura Wagner
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - MaryKate Frisch
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Skelton E, Drey N, Rutherford M, Ayers S, Malamateniou C. Electronic consenting for conducting research remotely: A review of current practice and key recommendations for using e-consenting. Int J Med Inform 2020; 143:104271. [PMID: 32979650 PMCID: PMC7487205 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic approaches are becoming more widely used to obtain informed consent for research participation. Electronic consent (e-consent) provides an accessible and versatile approach to the consenting process, which can be enhanced with audio-visual and interactive features to improve participant engagement and comprehension of study procedures. Best practice guidance underpinned by ethical principles is required to ensure effective implementation of e-consent for use in research. AIM To identify the key considerations for successful and ethical implementation of e-consent in the recruitment of participants to research projects which are conducted remotely. METHODS Electronic database searches of CINAHL, Medline, Embase, DARE, HTA, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, NHS Evidence, and hand-searches of reference lists were performed. Primary research studies of adult (≥ 18 years old) research participants using e-consent, published in English language, peer-reviewed journals between 2010-2020 were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS Of the initial 665 identified studies, 18 met the inclusion criteria: 6 cohort studies, 5 qualitative studies, 4 randomised control trials, 2 mixed-methods studies and one case-control study. Critical appraisal of included studies using Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tools suggested a low to moderate risk of bias in most studies (n = 15). Key practice recommendations for researchers using e-consent were identified around five primary themes: 1) accessibility and user-friendliness of e-consent, 2) user engagement and comprehension, 3) customisability to participant preferences and demographics, 4) data security and 5) impact on research teams. CONCLUSION E-consenting approaches are generally well received by participants, with most studies reporting user-friendly interfaces and sufficient participant comprehension of consenting documentation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE E-consent may facilitate remotely-conducted research by offering a feasible and robust alternative to face-to-face consenting approaches, however paper-based options should still be offered, based on participant preference. Customising e-consenting platforms may improve accessibility for individuals with specific needs, and increase engagement with study information. Research teams must offer prospective participants opportunities to discuss study information in real-time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Skelton
- Division of Radiography and Midwifery, City, University of London, UK; Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, King's College London, UK.
| | | | - Mary Rutherford
- Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, King's College London, UK
| | - Susan Ayers
- Division of Radiography and Midwifery, City, University of London, UK
| | - Christina Malamateniou
- Division of Radiography and Midwifery, City, University of London, UK; Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, King's College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pung J, Rienhoff O. Key components and IT assistance of participant management in clinical research: a scoping review. JAMIA Open 2020; 3:449-458. [PMID: 33215078 PMCID: PMC7660951 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Managing participants and their data are fundamental for the success of a clinical trial. Our review identifies and describes processes that deal with management of trial participants and highlights information technology (IT) assistance for clinical research in the context of participant management. Methods A scoping literature review design, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement, was used to identify literature on trial participant-related proceedings, work procedures, or workflows, and assisting electronic systems. Results The literature search identified 1329 articles of which 111 were included for analysis. Participant-related procedures were categorized into 4 major trial processes: recruitment, obtaining informed consent, managing identities, and managing administrative data. Our results demonstrated that management of trial participants is considered in nearly every step of clinical trials, and that IT was successfully introduced to all participant-related areas of a clinical trial to facilitate processes. Discussion There is no precise definition of participant management, so a broad search strategy was necessary, resulting in a high number of articles that had to be excluded. Nevertheless, this review provides a comprehensive overview of participant management-related components, which was lacking so far. The review contributes to a better understanding of how computer-assisted management of participants in clinical trials is possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Pung
- Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Otto Rienhoff
- Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
De Sutter E, Zaçe D, Boccia S, Di Pietro ML, Geerts D, Borry P, Huys I. Implementation of Electronic Informed Consent in Biomedical Research and Stakeholders' Perspectives: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e19129. [PMID: 33030440 PMCID: PMC7582148 DOI: 10.2196/19129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Informed consent is one of the key elements in biomedical research. The introduction of electronic informed consent can be a way to overcome many challenges related to paper-based informed consent; however, its novel opportunities remain largely unfulfilled due to several barriers. Objective We aimed to provide an overview of the ethical, legal, regulatory, and user interface perspectives of multiple stakeholder groups in order to assist responsible implementation of electronic informed consent in biomedical research. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search using Web of Science (Core collection), PubMed, EMBASE, ACM Digital Library, and PsycARTICLES. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were used for reporting this work. We included empirical full-text studies focusing on the concept of electronic informed consent in biomedical research covering the ethical, legal, regulatory, and user interface domains. Studies written in English and published from January 2010 onward were selected. We explored perspectives of different stakeholder groups, in particular researchers, research participants, health authorities, and ethics committees. We critically appraised literature included in the systematic review using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort and cross-sectional studies, Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for qualitative studies, Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for mixed methods studies, and Jadad tool for randomized controlled trials. Results A total of 40 studies met our inclusion criteria. Overall, the studies were heterogeneous in the type of study design, population, intervention, research context, and the tools used. Most of the studies’ populations were research participants (ie, patients and healthy volunteers). The majority of studies addressed barriers to achieving adequate understanding when using electronic informed consent. Concerns shared by multiple stakeholder groups were related to the security and legal validity of an electronic informed consent platform and usability for specific groups of research participants. Conclusions Electronic informed consent has the potential to improve the informed consent process in biomedical research compared to the current paper-based consent. The ethical, legal, regulatory, and user interface perspectives outlined in this review might serve to enhance the future implementation of electronic informed consent. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020158979; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=158979
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien De Sutter
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Drieda Zaçe
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefania Boccia
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.,Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Di Pietro
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - David Geerts
- Meaningful Interactions Lab, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hochheiser H, Valdez RS. Human-Computer Interaction, Ethics, and Biomedical Informatics. Yearb Med Inform 2020; 29:93-98. [PMID: 32823302 PMCID: PMC7442500 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives
: To provide an overview of recent work at the intersection of Biomedical Informatics, Human-Computer Interaction, and Ethics.
Methods
: Search terms for Human-Computer Interaction, Biomedical Informatics, and Ethics were used to identify relevant papers published between 2017 and 2019.Relevant papers were identified through multiple methods, including database searches, manual reviews of citations, recent publications, and special collections, as well as through peer recommendations. Identified articles were reviewed and organized into broad themes.
Results
: We identified relevant papers at the intersection of Biomedical Informatics, Human-Computer Interactions, and Ethics in over a dozen journals. The content of these papers was organized into three broad themes: ethical issues associated with systems in use, systems design, and responsible conduct of research.
Conclusions
: The results of this overview demonstrate an active interest in exploring the ethical implications of Human-Computer Interaction concerns in Biomedical Informatics. Papers emphasizing ethical concerns associated with patient-facing tools, mobile devices, social media, privacy, inclusivity, and e-consent reflect the growing prominence of these topics in biomedical informatics research. New questions in these areas will likely continue to arise with the growth of precision medicine and citizen science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry Hochheiser
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania USA
| | - Rupa S Valdez
- Public Health Sciences & Engineering Systems and Environment, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chen C, Lee PI, Pain KJ, Delgado D, Cole CL, Campion TR. Replacing Paper Informed Consent with Electronic Informed Consent for Research in Academic Medical Centers: A Scoping Review. AMIA JOINT SUMMITS ON TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE PROCEEDINGS. AMIA JOINT SUMMITS ON TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE 2020; 2020:80-88. [PMID: 32477626 PMCID: PMC7233043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Although experts have identified benefits to replacing paper with electronic consent (eConsent) for research, a comprehensive understanding of strategies to overcome barriers to adoption is unknown. To address this gap, we performed a scoping review of the literature describing eConsent in academic medical centers. Of 69 studies that met inclusion criteria, 81% (n=56) addressed ethical, legal, and social issues; 67% (n=46) described user interface/user experience considerations; 39% (n=27) compared electronic versus paper approaches; 33% (n=23) discussed approaches to enterprise scalability; and 25% (n=17) described changes to consent elections. Findings indicate a lack of a leading commercial eConsent vendor, as articles described a myriad of homegrown systems and extensions of vendor EHR patient portals. Opportunities appear to exist for researchers and commercial software vendors to develop eConsent approaches that address the five critical areas identified in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Chen
- Information Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Pou-I Lee
- Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Kevin J Pain
- Samuel J. Wood Library & C.V. Starr Biomedical Information Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Diana Delgado
- Samuel J. Wood Library & C.V. Starr Biomedical Information Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Curtis L Cole
- Information Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Thomas R Campion
- Information Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
- Clinical & Translational Science Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jung Y, Choi H, Shim H. Individual Willingness to Share Personal Health Information with Secondary Information Users in South Korea. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2020; 35:659-666. [PMID: 30822147 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1582311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
People's privacy concerns about electronic health records (EHRs) have been widely discussed. Given that in principle, patients have the right to control their information in EHRs, the system will not reach its full potential without their support. Although human beings are generally inclined toward privacy, contextual differences play a role in individual decisions to disclose personal information. Likewise, patients exhibit different responses in terms of sharing their health information in diverse scenarios. Empirical work on patients' attitudes towards the secondary use of their health information is scarce. This study aims to investigate individuals' willingness to share their health information based on anonymity, information type (partial vs. whole), and the type of information user (health professionals, health researchers, health-related governmental agencies, and other governmental agencies). Furthermore, this study attempts to examine the effects of interaction between the three factors. A survey was conducted in South Korea, and the data obtained were analyzed by ANOVA. Despite the recent rapid diffusion of EHRs in South Korea, there is little discussion of patients' privacy in society. The results show that, although anonymity and the user type have a significant effect on willingness to share health information, the information type has no significant effect. The results also indicate that the willingness to share was higher for health-related governmental agencies and health professionals than for other governmental agencies. The findings reveal that, although willingness to share anonymous information does not vary significantly, the willingness differs for identified information. The study contributes to research on patients' privacy behavior by analyzing their comprehensive responses to health information-sharing investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hanbyul Choi
- School of Management Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bani Issa W, Al Akour I, Ibrahim A, Almarzouqi A, Abbas S, Hisham F, Griffiths J. Privacy, confidentiality, security and patient safety concerns about electronic health records. Int Nurs Rev 2020; 67:218-230. [PMID: 32314398 DOI: 10.1111/inr.12585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2019] [Revised: 02/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
AIMS This study explored concerns among nurses working in the United Arab Emirates associated with the use of electronic health records, including privacy, confidentiality, security and patient safety. BACKGROUND Given the widespread implementation of electronic health records, there are concerns about data integrity that could jeopardize healthcare quality. Addressing nurses' concerns about data integrity and safety is critical to inform health policies and promote public trust. METHODS Nurses working in healthcare settings in the United Arab Emirates (N = 562) were invited to share their concerns about data integrity and patient safety using a mixed-method approach. Data were collected between January and June 2018 via questionnaires and focus group interviews. Following a survey of nurses' concerns about privacy, confidentiality, security and patient safety in electronic health records, six focus groups were held to gain deeper insights about their concerns. Major themes that emerged from the focus groups were extracted to align with the main sections of the questionnaire. RESULTS Nurses expressed concern over the security of electronic health records (n = 270, 48%). Administrative-related security, inadequate training and access by unauthorized users were the most frequently reported concerns. The main patient safety concerns were associated with non-technological factors, including lack of audit by staff, poor communication with technology vendors and length of time required for documentation. The focus group results reflected similar issues, with an additional theme being inconsistency in data integrity policies. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING/HEALTH POLICY Frontline nurse managers need to integrate pragmatic policies to support staff compliance with the code of ethics when using online data. Nurses must follow workplace policies that foster reporting of risks to online incident systems to ensure data integrity. A unified health policy based on multidisciplinary partnership is critical to safeguard online data and promote public trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Bani Issa
- Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.,Research Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - I Al Akour
- Department of Management Information System, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - A Ibrahim
- College of Business, American University in the Emirates, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - A Almarzouqi
- Health Services Administration, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - S Abbas
- Nursing Department - Hospitals Sector, Ministry of Health and Prevention, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - F Hisham
- Clinical Resource Nurse, Ministry of Health and Prevention, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - J Griffiths
- CEO Office, Dubai Healthcare Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Khairat S, Tirtanadi K, Ottmar P, Sleath B, Obeid J. Evaluating the Perceptions of Teleconsent in Urban and Rural Communities. EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS 2019; 15:https://www.ejbi.org/abstract/evaluating-the-perceptions-of-teleconsent-in-urban-and-rural-communities-5201.html. [PMID: 32802171 PMCID: PMC7427121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obtaining informed consent from research study participants continues to meet difficulties. New ways to connect with potential participants are necessary to address barriers, expand enrollment and offer more services to underserved populations. OBJECTIVES Electronic consent is designed to complete consenting sessions remotely and may help combat the obstacles inherent in the traditional informed consent process. We investigate the implementation of an electronic consent platform, Teleconsent, to broaden and diversify recruitment for clinical research. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with community members to assess their perceptions regarding the acceptability and usability of Teleconsent, a form of electronic consent. Interviews were structured to determine the main benefits, challenges and concerns as detailed by each participant. Participants were divided into rural and urban groupings. RESULTS We interviewed 40 participants to gather first-time perceptions of Teleconsent. We found overall positive results. Predominately in urban communities, participants possessed the technological skills and amenities to support smooth implementation of this technology. However, many participants reflect on the challenges regarding logistics, privacy and reliability of utilizing Teleconsent in underserved, rural areas. 5 of 19 participants, more than a quarter for the rural group, experienced Teleconsent software problems. During these sessions, an alternative process with paper templates was employed to complete interviews. CONCLUSION Perceptions regarding Teleconsent demonstrate current challenges along with potential acceptance within different communities. This is despite the fact that on its own it will not be able to overcome the barriers currently found in the informed consent process. Still, investment in electronic consent, including the development of enhanced and interactive content, can potentially revolutionize this process. Our findings offer a preliminary step towards determining the feasibility and acceptance of Teleconsent, a form of electronic consent, in different communities. More research surrounding the logistics of adoption is necessary in order to determine success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saif Khairat
- The Carolina Health Informatics Program, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Katie Tirtanadi
- The Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Paige Ottmar
- The Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Betsy Sleath
- The Eshelman School of Pharmacy and The Cecil Sheps Center for Health Services Research, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Jihad Obeid
- The Medical University, South Carolina, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Esmaeilzadeh P. Consumers’ Perceptions of Using Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) for Research Purposes. INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2018.1553649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh
- Department of Information Systems and Business Analytics, College of Business, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Velupillai S, Suominen H, Liakata M, Roberts A, Shah AD, Morley K, Osborn D, Hayes J, Stewart R, Downs J, Chapman W, Dutta R. Using clinical Natural Language Processing for health outcomes research: Overview and actionable suggestions for future advances. J Biomed Inform 2018; 88:11-19. [PMID: 30368002 PMCID: PMC6986921 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2018] [Revised: 10/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The importance of incorporating Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods in clinical informatics research has been increasingly recognized over the past years, and has led to transformative advances. Typically, clinical NLP systems are developed and evaluated on word, sentence, or document level annotations that model specific attributes and features, such as document content (e.g., patient status, or report type), document section types (e.g., current medications, past medical history, or discharge summary), named entities and concepts (e.g., diagnoses, symptoms, or treatments) or semantic attributes (e.g., negation, severity, or temporality). From a clinical perspective, on the other hand, research studies are typically modelled and evaluated on a patient- or population-level, such as predicting how a patient group might respond to specific treatments or patient monitoring over time. While some NLP tasks consider predictions at the individual or group user level, these tasks still constitute a minority. Owing to the discrepancy between scientific objectives of each field, and because of differences in methodological evaluation priorities, there is no clear alignment between these evaluation approaches. Here we provide a broad summary and outline of the challenging issues involved in defining appropriate intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation methods for NLP research that is to be used for clinical outcomes research, and vice versa. A particular focus is placed on mental health research, an area still relatively understudied by the clinical NLP research community, but where NLP methods are of notable relevance. Recent advances in clinical NLP method development have been significant, but we propose more emphasis needs to be placed on rigorous evaluation for the field to advance further. To enable this, we provide actionable suggestions, including a minimal protocol that could be used when reporting clinical NLP method development and its evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumithra Velupillai
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Hanna Suominen
- College of Engineering and Computer Science, The Australian National University, Data61/CSIRO, University of Canberra, Australia; University of Turku, Finland.
| | - Maria Liakata
- Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick/Alan Turing Institute, UK.
| | - Angus Roberts
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
| | - Anoop D Shah
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, UK; University College London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Katherine Morley
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
| | - David Osborn
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Joseph Hayes
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Robert Stewart
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Johnny Downs
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Wendy Chapman
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, United States.
| | - Rina Dutta
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ganslandt T, Neumaier M. Digital networks for laboratory data: potentials, barriers and current initiatives. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 57:336-342. [DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2018-1131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Medical care is increasingly delivered by multiple providers across healthcare sectors and specialties, leading to a fragmentation of the electronic patient record across organizations and vendor IT systems. The rapid uptake of wearables and connected diagnostic devices adds another source of densely collected data by the patients themselves. Integration of these data sources opens up several potentials: a longitudinal view of laboratory findings would close the gaps between individual provider visits and allow to more closely follow disease progression. Adding non-laboratory data (e.g. diagnoses, procedures) would add context and support clinical interpretation of findings. Case-based reasoning and disease-modelling approaches would allow to identify similar patient groups and classify endotypes. Realization of these potentials is, however, subject to several barriers, including legal and ethical prerequisites of data access, syntactic and semantic integration, comparability of items and user-centered presentation. The German Medical Informatics Initiative is presented as a current undertaking that strives to address these issues by establishing a national infrastructure for the secondary use of routine clinical data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Ganslandt
- Department of Biomedical Informatics of the Heinrich-Lanz-Center , Mannheim University Medicine, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg , Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3 , 68167 Mannheim , Germany
| | - Michael Neumaier
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry, Mannheim University Medicine, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg , Mannheim , Germany
| |
Collapse
|