1
|
Sylvester-Armstrong KR, Reeder CF, Powell A, Becker MW, Hagan DW, Chen J, Mathews CE, Wasserfall CH, Atkinson MA, Egerman R, Phelps EA. Serum from pregnant donors induces human beta cell proliferation. Islets 2024; 16:2334044. [PMID: 38533763 PMCID: PMC10978022 DOI: 10.1080/19382014.2024.2334044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic beta cells are among the slowest replicating cells in the human body and have not been observed to increase in number except during the fetal and neonatal period, in cases of obesity, during puberty, as well as during pregnancy. Pregnancy is associated with increased beta cell mass to meet heightened insulin demands. This phenomenon raises the intriguing possibility that factors present in the serum of pregnant individuals may stimulate beta cell proliferation and offer insights into expansion of the beta cell mass for treatment and prevention of diabetes. The primary objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that serum from pregnant donors contains bioactive factors capable of inducing human beta cell proliferation. An immortalized human beta cell line with protracted replication (EndoC-βH1) was cultured in media supplemented with serum from pregnant and non-pregnant female and male donors and assessed for differences in proliferation. This experiment was followed by assessment of proliferation of primary human beta cells. Sera from five out of six pregnant donors induced a significant increase in the proliferation rate of EndoC-βH1 cells. Pooled serum from the cohort of pregnant donors also increased the rate of proliferation in primary human beta cells. This study demonstrates that serum from pregnant donors stimulates human beta cell proliferation. These findings suggest the existence of pregnancy-associated factors that can offer novel avenues for beta cell regeneration and diabetes prevention strategies. Further research is warranted to elucidate the specific factors responsible for this effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Callie F. Reeder
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Andrece Powell
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Matthew W. Becker
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - D. Walker Hagan
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Jing Chen
- Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine and University of Florida Diabetes Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Clayton E. Mathews
- Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine and University of Florida Diabetes Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Clive H. Wasserfall
- Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine and University of Florida Diabetes Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Mark A. Atkinson
- Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine and University of Florida Diabetes Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Robert Egerman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Edward A. Phelps
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine and University of Florida Diabetes Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nieuwoudt C, Reeder CF, Moss HK, van Nes JB, Schoutko WW, Jeter JW, Fortner KB. Vaccination uptake for pertussis and influenza vaccines in pregnancy among different practices at a single institution. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023. [PMID: 37078486 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors investigated tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) and influenza vaccination during pregnancy following Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' (ACIP's) recommendation for antenatal pertussis vaccination. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed in 2019 of women receiving prenatal care at our institution between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018. Receipt of ACIP-recommended vaccines were examined using Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify initiation of prenatal care, then administration of Tdap and influenza vaccines. Data were examined by individual practice (university faculty, community physicians, obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residents, and family medicine residents, practice staff composition, vaccination protocol use, and insurance status. Statistical analyses were performed using χ2 testing and χ2 testing of linear trend. RESULTS Within our cohort (n = 17 973), highest vaccination uptake occurred in the university-based OBGYN faculty practice (Tdap = 58.2%, influenza = 56.5%) with lowest uptake in the OBGYN resident practice (Tdap = 28.6%, influenza = 18.5%). Higher uptake occurred in practices with standing orders, more advanced practice providers, lower provider to nursing ratios, and lower rates of Medicaid insurance. CONCLUSION These data demonstrated higher vaccination uptake with standing orders, more advanced practice providers, and lower provider to nurse ratios. Future work optimizing practice staff composition and vaccination protocols may increase vaccine uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Nieuwoudt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wake Forest, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - C F Reeder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - H K Moss
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - J B van Nes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - W W Schoutko
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - J W Jeter
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | - K B Fortner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sylvester-Armstrong KR, Reeder CF, Powell A, Becker MW, Hagan DW, Chen J, Mathews CE, Wasserfall CH, Atkinson MA, Egerman R, Phelps EA. Serum from pregnant donors induces human beta cell proliferation and insulin secretion. bioRxiv 2023:2023.04.17.537214. [PMID: 37131658 PMCID: PMC10153135 DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.17.537214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic beta cells are among the slowest replicating cells in the human body. Human beta cells usually do not increase in number with exceptions being during the neonatal period, in cases of obesity, and during pregnancy. This project explored maternal serum for stimulatory potential on human beta cell proliferation and insulin output. Gravid, full-term women who were scheduled to undergo cesarean delivery were recruited for this study. A human beta cell line was cultured in media supplemented with serum from pregnant and non-pregnant donors and assessed for differences in proliferation and insulin secretion. A subset of pregnant donor sera induced significant increases in beta cell proliferation and insulin secretion. Pooled serum from pregnant donors also increased proliferation in primary human beta cells but not primary human hepatocytes indicating a cell-type specific effect. This study suggests stimulatory factors in human serum during pregnancy could provide a novel approach for human beta cell expansion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Callie F. Reeder
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Andrece Powell
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Matthew W. Becker
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - D. Walker Hagan
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Jing Chen
- Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine and University of Florida Diabetes Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Clayton E. Mathews
- Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine and University of Florida Diabetes Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Clive H. Wasserfall
- Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine and University of Florida Diabetes Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Mark A. Atkinson
- Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine and University of Florida Diabetes Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Robert Egerman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Edward A. Phelps
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lemas DJ, Layton C, Ballard H, Xu K, Smulian JC, Gurka M, Loop MS, Smith EL, Reeder CF, Louis-Jacques A, Hsiao CJ, Cacho N, Hall J. Perinatal Health Outcomes Across Rural and Nonrural Counties Within a Single Health System Catchment. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle) 2023; 4:169-181. [PMID: 37096122 PMCID: PMC10122232 DOI: 10.1089/whr.2022.0061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
Background Perinatal health outcomes are influenced by a variety of socioeconomic, behavioral, and economic factors that reduce access to health services. Despite these observations, rural communities continue to face barriers, including a lack of resources and the fragmentation of health services. Objective To evaluate patterns in health outcomes, health behaviors, socioeconomic vulnerability, and sociodemographic characteristics across rural and nonrural counties within a single health system catchment area. Methods Socioeconomic vulnerability metrics, health care access as determined by licensed provider metrics, and behavioral data were obtained from FlHealthCHARTS.gov and the County Health Rankings. County-level birth and health data were obtained from the Florida Department of Health. The University of Florida Health Perinatal Catchment Area (UFHPCA) was defined as all Florida counties where ≥5% of all infants were delivered at Shands Hospital between June 2011 and April 2017. Results The UFHPCA included 3 nonrural and 10 rural counties that represented more than 64,000 deliveries. Nearly 1 in 3 infants resided in a rural county, and 7 out of 13 counties did not have a licensed obstetrician gynecologist. Maternal smoking rates (range 6.8%-24.8%) were above the statewide rate (6.2%). Except for Alachua County, breastfeeding initiation rates (range 54.9%-81.4%) and access to household computing devices (range 72.8%-86.4%) were below the statewide rate (82.9% and 87.9%, respectively). Finally, we found that childhood poverty rates (range 16.3%-36.9%) were above the statewide rate (18.5%). Furthermore, risk ratios suggested negative health outcomes for residents of counties within the UFHPCA for each measure, except for infant mortality and maternal deaths, which lacked sample sizes to adequately test. Conclusions The health burden of the UFHPCA is characterized by rural counties with increased maternal death, neonatal death, and preterm birth, as well as adverse health behaviors that included increased smoking during pregnancy and lower levels of breastfeeding relative to nonrural counties. Understanding perinatal health outcomes across a single health system has potential to not only estimate community needs but also facilitate planning of health care initiatives and interventions in rural and low-resource communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominick J. Lemas
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Address correspondence to: Dominick J. Lemas, PhD, Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2004 Mowry Road, Clinical and Translational Research Building, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
| | - Claire Layton
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Hailey Ballard
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Ke Xu
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - John C. Smulian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Matthew Gurka
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Matthew Shane Loop
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Erica L. Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Callie F. Reeder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Adetola Louis-Jacques
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Chu J. Hsiao
- Department of Anthropology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Nicole Cacho
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Jaclyn Hall
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reeder CF, Sylvester-Armstrong KR, Silva LM, Wert EM, Smulian JC, Genc MR. Outcomes of pregnancies at high-risk for placenta accreta spectrum following negative diagnostic imaging. J Perinat Med 2022; 50:595-600. [PMID: 35218171 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2021-0591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the pretest and negative post-test probability for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in a group of patients with high-risk clinical factors. METHODS We included patients with suspected and/or confirmed PAS at our institution over 8 years. Sonography performed by maternal-fetal medicine specialists, and selected patients underwent MRI. Imaging was considered positive if either sonography or MRI suggested PAS. Histopathology was the gold standard for diagnosis of PAS. We assessed the pretest and negative imaging-test probability, and resources required. RESULTS We identified 82 high-risk patients with the following: (1) a history of ≥1 cesarean section and/or intrauterine gynecologic procedure and placenta previa in the index pregnancy; (2) a history of >3 cesarean deliveries and/or gynecologic procedures regardless of placental location; (3) prior PAS disorder, or retained placenta requiring manual extraction and/or curettage, complicated by postpartum hemorrhage; and (4) suspected cesarean section scar pregnancy. Histopathology confirmed PAS in 52 patients, with pretest probability of 63%. Imaging correctly identified 44/50 cases with PAS, and excluded this condition in 24/30 cases. Thus, the positive and negative post-test probability for PAS following negative imaging was 88 and 20%, respectively. Of the six patients with false-negative imaging, all had either surgical complications or required care beyond that for routine cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS Although diagnostic imaging is sensitive, the negative posttest probability remains high in women with high pretest probability for PAS. Therefore, women at high risk for PAS should be managed in experienced centers by a multidisciplinary team even if imaging is negative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Callie F Reeder
- University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Lauren M Silva
- University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Erika M Wert
- University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - John C Smulian
- University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Mehmet R Genc
- University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hentschel A, Hsiao CJ, Chen LY, Wright L, Shaw J, Du X, Flood-Grady E, Harle CA, Reeder CF, Francois M, Louis-Jacques A, Shenkman E, Krieger JL, Lemas DJ. Perspectives of Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women on Participating in Longitudinal Mother-Baby Studies Involving Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Study. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2021; 4:e23842. [PMID: 33666558 PMCID: PMC8080167 DOI: 10.2196/23842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic health records (EHRs) hold great potential for longitudinal mother-baby studies, ranging from assessing study feasibility to facilitating patient recruitment to streamlining study visits and data collection. Existing studies on the perspectives of pregnant and breastfeeding women on EHR use have been limited to the use of EHRs to engage in health care rather than to participate in research. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to explore the perspectives of pregnant and breastfeeding women on releasing their own and their infants' EHR data for longitudinal research to identify factors affecting their willingness to participate in research. METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with pregnant or breastfeeding women from Alachua County, Florida. Participants were asked about their familiarity with EHRs and EHR patient portals, their comfort with releasing maternal and infant EHR data to researchers, the length of time of the data release, and whether individual research test results should be included in the EHR. The interviews were transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were organized and coded using the NVivo 12 software (QSR International), and coded data were thematically analyzed using constant comparison. RESULTS Participants included 29 pregnant or breastfeeding women aged between 22 and 39 years. More than half of the sample had at least an associate degree or higher. Nearly all participants (27/29, 93%) were familiar with EHRs and had experience accessing an EHR patient portal. Less than half of the participants (12/29, 41%) were willing to make EHR data available to researchers for the duration of a study or longer. Participants' concerns about sharing EHRs for research purposes emerged in 3 thematic domains: privacy and confidentiality, transparency by the research team, and surrogate decision-making on behalf of infants. The potential release of sensitive or stigmatizing information, such as mental or sexual health history, was considered in the decisions to release EHRs. Some participants viewed the simultaneous use of their EHRs for both health care and research as potentially beneficial, whereas others expressed concerns about mixing their health care with research. CONCLUSIONS This exploratory study indicates that pregnant and breastfeeding women may be willing to release EHR data to researchers if researchers adequately address their concerns regarding the study design, communication, and data management. Pregnant and breastfeeding women should be included in EHR-based research as long as researchers are prepared to address their concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austen Hentschel
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Chu J Hsiao
- Department of Anthropology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Lynn Y Chen
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Lauren Wright
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jennifer Shaw
- Southcentral Foundation, Anchorage, AK, United States
| | - Xinsong Du
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Elizabeth Flood-Grady
- Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,STEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Christopher A Harle
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Callie F Reeder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Magda Francois
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Adetola Louis-Jacques
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Elizabeth Shenkman
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Janice L Krieger
- Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,STEM Translational Communication Center, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Dominick J Lemas
- Department of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Clinical Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Pregnant women are at risk for infection and may have significant morbidity or mortality. Influenza, pertussis, zika, and cytomegalovirus produce mild or asymptomatic illness in the mother, but have profound implications for her fetus. Maternal immunization can prevent or mitigate infections in pregnant women and their infants. The Advisory Committee of Immunization Practices recommends 2 vaccines during pregnancy: inactivated influenza, and tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis during pregnancy. The benefits of MMR, varicella, and other vaccines are reviewed. Novel vaccine studies for use during pregnancy for prevention of illness are explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly B Fortner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Box 96, Knoxville, TN 37919, USA.
| | - Claudia Nieuwoudt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Medical Center, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Box U27, Knoxville, TN 37920, USA
| | - Callie F Reeder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Medical Center, 1924 Alcoa Highway, Box U27, Knoxville, TN 37920, USA
| | - Geeta K Swamy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Obstetrics Clinical Research, Duke University Medical System, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|