1
|
Brown T, Kruse C, Schmitt R, Gaffney G, Milavetz G. Assessing the impact of cannabis use on freeway driving performance and practices: A comparative analysis with placebo and alcohol-influenced driving. TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION 2024:1-10. [PMID: 39303060 DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2393215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Revised: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objectives of this study were 1) to identify the effects cannabis has on driving performance and individual motor practices when on the freeway compared to placebo and 2) to bring context to the effects of cannabis on driving by comparing effect sizes to those of alcohol. METHODS Data for analysis was collected from a study of fifty-three participants with a history of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) cannabis use who completed three visits in randomized order (placebo (0% THC), 6.18% THC, and 10.5% THC). Data for the alcohol analysis was from a subset of eighteen of these participants with a history of recent alcohol use that completed a fourth alcohol visit that targeted a .05 g/210L breath alcohol content (BrAC) during the drive. Comparisons were made using an analysis of variance approach with the SAS General Linear Models Procedure. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated for the cannabis and alcohol conditions relative to placebo for both the full sample and alcohol subset. RESULTS Standard deviation of lane position (SDLP) for cannabis significantly increased compared to placebo and the effect size was comparable to that of alcohol at .05 BrAC. Lane departures for cannabis significantly increased relative to placebo as did the time out of the lane. Cannabis use resulted in an increased amount of time at 10% or more below the speed limit for the 6.18% THC condition. Relative to alcohol, cannabis produced more time at slower speeds and less time at speeds more than 10% above the speed limit. CONCLUSIONS Multiple factors of lateral and longitudinal vehicle control on the freeway showed statistical significance. Drivers under the influence of cannabis exhibited higher rates of driving errors but also showed more cautious behaviors such as generally lower speeds on the freeway. Compared with alcohol, effect sizes varied. For longitudinal control, there were larger effect sizes for alcohol with speed effects in opposite directions, but relatively equivalent effect sizes for lateral control and driving errors associated with lane keeping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Brown
- University of Iowa Driving Safety Research Institute, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Cole Kruse
- College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Rose Schmitt
- University of Iowa Driving Safety Research Institute, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Gary Gaffney
- University of Iowa Driving Safety Research Institute, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Gary Milavetz
- College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Metrik J, McCarthy DM. How research and policy can shape driving under the influence of cannabis. Addiction 2024; 119:208-210. [PMID: 37877315 PMCID: PMC11104562 DOI: 10.1111/add.16372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Metrik
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
- Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Denis M. McCarthy
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marcotte TD, Umlauf A, Grelotti DJ, Sones EG, Mastropietro KF, Suhandynata RT, Huestis MA, Grant I, Fitzgerald RL. Evaluation of Field Sobriety Tests for Identifying Drivers Under the Influence of Cannabis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2023; 80:914-923. [PMID: 37531115 PMCID: PMC10398547 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.2345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
Importance With increasing medicinal and recreational cannabis legalization, there is a public health need for effective and unbiased evaluations for determining whether a driver is impaired due to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) exposure. Field sobriety tests (FSTs) are a key component of the gold standard law enforcement officer-based evaluations, yet controlled studies are inconclusive regarding their efficacy in detecting whether a person is under the influence of THC. Objective To examine the classification accuracy of FSTs with respect to cannabis exposure and driving impairment (as determined via a driving simulation). Design, Setting, and Participants This double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel randomized clinical trial was conducted from February 2017 to June 2019 at the Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, University of California, San Diego. Participants were aged 21 to 55 years and had used cannabis in the past month. Data were analyzed from August 2021 to April 2023. Intervention Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo (0.02% THC), 5.9% THC cannabis, or 13.4% THC cannabis smoked ad libitum. Main Outcome and Measures The primary end point was law enforcement officer determination of FST impairment at 4 time points after smoking. Additional measures included officer estimation as to whether participants were in the THC or placebo group as well as driving simulator data. Officers did not observe driving performance. Results The study included 184 participants (117 [63.6%] male; mean [SD] age, 30 [8.3] years) who had used cannabis a mean (SD) of 16.7 (9.8) days in the past 30 days; 121 received THC and 63, placebo. Officers classified 98 participants (81.0%) in the THC group and 31 (49.2%) in the placebo group as FST impaired (difference, 31.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 16.4-47.2 percentage points; P < .001) at 70 minutes after smoking. The THC group performed significantly worse than the placebo group on 8 of 27 individual FST components (29.6%) and all FST summary scores. However, the placebo group did not complete a median of 8 (IQR, 5-11) FST components as instructed. Of 128 participants classified as FST impaired, officers suspected 127 (99.2%) as having received THC. Driving simulator performance was significantly associated with results of select FSTs (eg, ≥2 clues on One Leg Stand was associated with impairment on the simulator: odds ratio, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.63-5.88; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial found that when administered by highly trained officers, FSTs differentiated between individuals receiving THC vs placebo and driving abilities were associated with results of some FSTs. However, the high rate at which the participants receiving placebo failed to adequately perform FSTs and the high frequency that poor FST performance was suspected to be due to THC-related impairment suggest that FSTs, absent other indicators, may be insufficient to denote THC-specific impairment in drivers. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02849587.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas D. Marcotte
- Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego
| | - Anya Umlauf
- Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego
| | - David J. Grelotti
- Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego
| | - Emily G. Sones
- Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego
| | - Kyle F. Mastropietro
- Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego
| | - Raymond T. Suhandynata
- Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego
- Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego
| | - Marilyn A. Huestis
- Institute for Emerging Health Professions, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Igor Grant
- Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego
| | - Robert L. Fitzgerald
- Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brubacher JR, Chan H, Erdelyi S, Yuan Y, Daoust R, Vaillancourt C, Rowe B, Lee J, Mercier E, Atkinson P, Davis P, Clarke D, Taylor J, Macpherson A, Emond M, Al-Hakim D, Horwood C, Wishart I, Magee K, Rao J, Eppler J. High-'n'-dry? A comparison of cannabis and alcohol use in drivers presenting to hospital after a vehicular collision. Addiction 2023; 118:1507-1516. [PMID: 36898848 DOI: 10.1111/add.16186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
DESIGN This was a prospective observational study. BACKGROUND AND AIMS The characteristics of cannabis-involved motor vehicle collisions are poorly understood. This study of injured drivers identifies demographic and collision characteristics associated with high tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentrations. SETTING The study was conducted in 15 Canadian trauma centres between January 2018 and December 2021. CASES The cases (n = 6956) comprised injured drivers who required blood testing as part of routine trauma care. MEASUREMENTS We quantified whole blood THC and blood alcohol concentration (BAC) and recorded driver sex, age and postal code, time of crash, crash type and injury severity. We defined three driver groups: high THC (THC ≥ 5 ng/ml and BAC = 0), high alcohol (BAC ≥ 0.08% and THC = 0) and THC/BAC-negative (THC = 0 = BAC). We used logistic regression techniques to identify factors associated with group membership. FINDINGS Most injured drivers (70.2%) were THC/BAC-negative; 1274 (18.3%) had THC > 0, including 186 (2.7%) in the high THC group; 1161 (16.7%) had BAC > 0, including 606 (8.7%) in the high BAC group. Males and drivers aged less than 45 years had higher adjusted odds of being in the high THC group (versus the THC/BAC-negative group). Importantly, 4.6% of drivers aged less than 19 years had THC ≥ 5 ng/ml, and drivers aged less than 19 years had higher unadjusted odds of being in the high THC group than drivers aged 45-54 years. Males, drivers aged 19-44 years, rural drivers, seriously injured drivers and drivers injured in single-vehicle, night-time or weekend collisions had higher adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for being in the high alcohol group (versus THC/BAC-negative). Drivers aged less than 35 or more than 65 years and drivers involved in multi-vehicle, daytime or weekday collisions had higher adjusted odds for being in the high THC group (versus the high BAC group). CONCLUSIONS In Canada, risk factors for cannabis-related motor vehicle collisions appear to differ from those for alcohol-related motor vehicle collisions. The collision factors associated with alcohol (single-vehicle, night-time, weekend, rural, serious injury) are not associated with cannabis-related collisions. Demographic factors (young drivers, male drivers) are associated with both alcohol and cannabis-related collisions, but are more strongly associated with cannabis-related collisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J R Brubacher
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Columbia, BC, Canada
| | - H Chan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Columbia, BC, Canada
| | - S Erdelyi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Columbia, BC, Canada
| | - Y Yuan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Columbia, BC, Canada
| | - R Daoust
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - C Vaillancourt
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - B Rowe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - J Lee
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - E Mercier
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - P Atkinson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, St John, NB, Canada
| | - P Davis
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - D Clarke
- Department of Surgery (Neurosurgery), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - J Taylor
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Columbia, BC, Canada
| | - A Macpherson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Columbia, BC, Canada
| | - M Emond
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - D Al-Hakim
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Columbia, BC, Canada
| | - C Horwood
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Memorial University, St John, NB, Canada
| | - I Wishart
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - K Magee
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - J Rao
- Department of Surgery, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - J Eppler
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Columbia, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fitzgerald RL, Umlauf A, Hubbard JA, Hoffman MA, Sobolesky PM, Ellis SE, Grelotti DJ, Suhandynata RT, Huestis MA, Grant I, Marcotte TD. Driving Under the Influence of Cannabis: Impact of Combining Toxicology Testing with Field Sobriety Tests. Clin Chem 2023; 69:724-733. [PMID: 37228223 PMCID: PMC10320013 DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cannabis is increasingly used both medically and recreationally. With widespread use, there is growing concern about how to identify cannabis-impaired drivers. METHODS A placebo-controlled randomized double-blinded protocol was conducted to study the effects of cannabis on driving performance. One hundred ninety-one participants were randomized to smoke ad libitum a cannabis cigarette containing placebo or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (5.9% or 13.4%). Blood, oral fluid (OF), and breath samples were collected along with longitudinal driving performance on a simulator (standard deviation of lateral position [SDLP] and car following [coherence]) over a 5-hour period. Law enforcement officers performed field sobriety tests (FSTs) to determine if participants were impaired. RESULTS There was no relationship between THC concentrations measured in blood, OF, or breath and SDLP or coherence at any of the timepoints studied (P > 0.05). FSTs were significant (P < 0.05) for classifying participants into the THC group vs the placebo group up to 188 minutes after smoking. Seventy-one minutes after smoking, FSTs classified 81% of the participants who received active drug as being impaired. However, 49% of participants who smoked placebo (controls) were also deemed impaired at this same timepoint. Combining a 2 ng/mL THC cutoff in OF with positive findings on FSTs reduced the number of controls classified as impaired to zero, 86 minutes after smoking the placebo. CONCLUSIONS Requiring a positive toxicology result in addition to the FST observations substantially improved the classification accuracy regarding possible driving under the influence of THC by decreasing the percentage of controls classified as impaired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anya Umlauf
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, San Diego, CA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Shannon E Ellis
- Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - David J Grelotti
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, San Diego, CA, United States
| | | | - Marilyn A Huestis
- Institute for Emerging Health Professions, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Igor Grant
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Thomas D Marcotte
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, San Diego, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Xiao KB, Grennell E, Ngoy A, George TP, Le Foll B, Hendershot CS, Sloan ME. Cannabis self-administration in the human laboratory: a scoping review of ad libitum studies. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2023:10.1007/s00213-023-06360-4. [PMID: 37157001 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-023-06360-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Cannabis self-administration studies may be helpful for identifying factors that influence cannabis consumption and subjective response to cannabis. Additionally, these paradigms could be useful for testing novel pharmacotherapies for cannabis use disorder. This scoping review aims to summarize the findings from existing ad libitum cannabis self-administration studies to determine what has been learned from these studies as well as their limitations. We examined studies that specifically examined cannabis smoking, focusing on subjective response and self-administration behavior (e.g., smoking topography). A systematic search was conducted using PubMed and Embase from inception to October 22, 2022. Our search strategy identified 26 studies (total N = 662, 79% male) that met our eligibility criteria. We found that tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration significantly affected subjective response to cannabis in some but not all studies. In general, cannabis self-administration tended to be most intense at the beginning of the laboratory session and decreased in later parts of the session. There was limited data on cannabis self-administration in adults older than 55. Data on external validity and test-retest reliability were also limited. Addressing these limitations in future ad libitum cannabis self-administration studies could lead to more valid and generalizable paradigms, which in turn could be used to improve our understanding of cannabis use patterns and to help guide medication development for cannabis use disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke Bin Xiao
- Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erin Grennell
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony Ngoy
- Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tony P George
- Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Biobehavioural Addictions and Concurrent Disorders Research Laboratory (BACDRL), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bernard Le Foll
- Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Translational Addiction Research Laboratory, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Waypoint Research Institute, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christian S Hendershot
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Matthew E Sloan
- Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Antunes M, Barroso M, Gallardo E. Analysis of Cannabinoids in Biological Specimens: An Update. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:2312. [PMID: 36767678 PMCID: PMC9915035 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Cannabinoids are still the most consumed drugs of abuse worldwide. Despite being considered less harmful to human health, particularly if compared with opiates or cocaine, cannabis consumption has important medico-legal and public health consequences. For this reason, the development and optimization of sensitive analytical methods that allow the determination of these compounds in different biological specimens is important, involving relevant efforts from laboratories. This paper will discuss cannabis consumption; toxicokinetics, the most detected compounds in biological samples; and characteristics of the latter. In addition, a comprehensive review of extraction methods and analytical tools available for cannabinoid detection in selected biological specimens will be reviewed. Important issues such as pitfalls and cut-off values will be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mónica Antunes
- CICS-UBI—Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Avenida Infante D. Henrique, 6201-506 Covilha, Portugal
- Serviço de Química e Toxicologia Forenses, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal e Ciências Forenses, Delegação do Sul, Rua Manuel Bento de Sousa 3, 1169-201 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Mário Barroso
- Serviço de Química e Toxicologia Forenses, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal e Ciências Forenses, Delegação do Sul, Rua Manuel Bento de Sousa 3, 1169-201 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Eugenia Gallardo
- CICS-UBI—Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Avenida Infante D. Henrique, 6201-506 Covilha, Portugal
- Laboratório de Fármaco-Toxicologia, UBIMedical, Universidade da Beira Interior, EM506, 6200-284 Covilha, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cheng JYK, Hui JWS, Chan WS, So MH, Hong YH, Leung WT, Ku KW, Yeung HS, Lo KM, Fung KM, Ip CY, Dao KL, Cheung BKK. Interpol review of toxicology 2019-2022. Forensic Sci Int Synerg 2022; 6:100303. [PMID: 36597440 PMCID: PMC9799715 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Yuk-ki Cheng
- Government Laboratory, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
| | | | - Wing-sum Chan
- Government Laboratory, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
| | - Man-ho So
- Government Laboratory, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
| | - Yau-hin Hong
- Government Laboratory, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
| | - Wai-tung Leung
- Government Laboratory, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
| | - Ka-wai Ku
- Government Laboratory, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
| | - Hoi-sze Yeung
- Government Laboratory, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
| | - Kam-moon Lo
- Government Laboratory, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
| | - Kit-mai Fung
- Government Laboratory, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
| | - Chi-yuen Ip
- Government Laboratory, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
| | - Kwok-leung Dao
- Government Laboratory, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gaulier JM, Brunet B, Labat L, Eysseric H, Gheddar L, Ameline A, Kintz P. Guide d’interprétation des concentrations salivaires des stupéfiants, proposé par la SFTA. TOXICOLOGIE ANALYTIQUE ET CLINIQUE 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.toxac.2022.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
10
|
Marcotte TD, Umlauf A, Grelotti DJ, Sones EG, Sobolesky PM, Smith BE, Hoffman MA, Hubbard JA, Severson J, Huestis MA, Grant I, Fitzgerald RL. Driving Performance and Cannabis Users' Perception of Safety: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2022; 79:201-209. [PMID: 35080588 PMCID: PMC8792796 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.4037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Expanding cannabis medicalization and legalization increases the urgency to understand the factors associated with acute driving impairment. OBJECTIVE To determine, in a large sample of regular cannabis users, the magnitude and time course of driving impairment produced by smoked cannabis of different Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content, the effects of use history, and concordance between perceived impairment and observed performance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel randomized clinical trial took place from February 2017 to June 2019 at the Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, University of California San Diego. Cannabis users were recruited for this study, and analysis took place between April 2020 and September 2021. INTERVENTIONS Placebo or 5.9% or 13.4% THC cannabis smoked ad libitum. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was the Composite Drive Score (CDS), which comprised key driving simulator variables, assessed prior to smoking and at multiple time points postsmoking. Additional measures included self-perceptions of driving impairment and cannabis use history. RESULTS Of 191 cannabis users, 118 (61.8%) were male, the mean (SD) age was 29.9 (8.3) years, and the mean (SD) days of use in the past month was 16.7 (9.8). Participants were randomized to the placebo group (63 [33.0%]), 5.9% THC (66 [34.6%]), and 13.4% THC (62 [32.5%]). Compared with placebo, the THC group significantly declined on the Composite Drive Score at 30 minutes (Cohen d = 0.59 [95% CI, 0.28-0.90]; P < .001) and 1 hour 30 minutes (Cohen d = 0.55 [95% CI, 0.24-0.86]; P < .001), with borderline differences at 3 hours 30 minutes (Cohen d = 0.29 [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.60]; P = .07) and no differences at 4 hours 30 minutes (Cohen d = -0.03 [95% CI, -0.33 to 0.28]; P = .87). The Composite Drive Score did not differ based on THC content (likelihood ratio χ24 = 3.83; P = .43) or use intensity (quantity × frequency) in the past 6 months (likelihood ratio χ24 = 1.41; P = .49), despite postsmoking blood THC concentrations being higher in those with the highest use intensity. Although there was hesitancy to drive immediately postsmoking, increasing numbers (81 [68.6%]) of participants reported readiness to drive at 1 hour 30 minutes despite performance not improving from initial postsmoking levels. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Smoking cannabis ad libitum by regular users resulted in simulated driving decrements. However, when experienced users control their own intake, driving impairment cannot be inferred based on THC content of the cigarette, behavioral tolerance, or THC blood concentrations. Participants' increasing willingness to drive at 1 hour 30 minutes may indicate a false sense of driving safety. Worse driving performance is evident for several hours postsmoking in many users but appears to resolve by 4 hours 30 minutes in most individuals. Further research is needed on the impact of individual biologic differences, cannabis use history, and administration methods on driving performance. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02849587.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anya Umlauf
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego
| | - David J. Grelotti
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego
| | - Emily G. Sones
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego
| | - Philip M. Sobolesky
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, San Diego,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California
| | - Breland E. Smith
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, San Diego,LetsGetChecked Labs, Monrovia, California
| | - Melissa A. Hoffman
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, San Diego,Vividion Therapeutics, San Diego, California
| | - Jacqueline A. Hubbard
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, San Diego,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | | | - Marilyn A. Huestis
- Institute for Emerging Health Professions, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Igor Grant
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Laudanski K, Wain J. Considerations for Cannabinoids in Perioperative Care by Anesthesiologists. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11030558. [PMID: 35160010 PMCID: PMC8836924 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Increased usage of recreational and medically indicated cannabinoid compounds has been an undeniable reality for anesthesiologists in recent years. These compounds’ complicated pharmacology, composition, and biological effects result in challenging issues for anesthesiologists during different phases of perioperative care. Here, we review the existing formulation of cannabinoids and their biological activity to put them into the context of the anesthesia plan execution. Perioperative considerations should include a way to gauge the patient’s intake of cannabinoids, the ability to gain consent properly, and vigilance to the increased risk of pulmonary and airway problems. Intraoperative management in individuals with cannabinoid use is complicated by the effects cannabinoids have on general anesthetics and depth of anesthesia monitoring while simultaneously increasing the potential occurrence of intraoperative hemodynamic instability. Postoperative planning should involve higher vigilance to the risk of postoperative strokes and acute coronary syndromes. However, most of the data are not up to date, rending definite conclusions on the importance of perioperative cannabinoid intake on anesthesia management difficult.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krzysztof Laudanski
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Correspondence: (K.L.); (J.W.)
| | - Justin Wain
- School of Osteopathic Medicine, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC 27506, USA
- Correspondence: (K.L.); (J.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Smith RC, Sershen H, Janowsky DS, Lajtha A, Grieco M, Gangoiti JA, Gertsman I, Johnson WS, Marcotte TD, Davis JM. Changes in Expression of DNA-Methyltransferase and Cannabinoid Receptor mRNAs in Blood Lymphocytes After Acute Cannabis Smoking. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:887700. [PMID: 35859599 PMCID: PMC9290435 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.887700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cannabis use is a component risk factor for the manifestation of schizophrenia. The biological effects of cannabis include effects on epigenetic systems, immunological parameters, in addition to changes in cannabinoid receptors 1 and 2, that may be associated with this risk. However, there has been limited study of the effects of smoked cannabis on these biological effects in human peripheral blood cells. We analyzed the effects of two concentrations of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) vs. placebo in lymphocytes of a subset of participants who enrolled in a double-blind study of the effects of cannabis on driving performance (outcome not the focus of this study). METHODS Twenty four participants who regularly use cannabis participated in an experiment in which they smoked cannabis cigarettes (5.9 or 13.4% THC) or placebo (0.02%) ad libitum. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and several times after smoking. Lymphocytes were separated and stored at -80°C for further analysis. Samples were analyzed for mRNA content for cannabinoid receptors 1 (CB1) and 2 (CB2), methylation and demethylating enzymes (DNMT, TET), glucocorticoid receptor (NRC3) and immunological markers (IL1B, TNFα) by qPCR using TaqMan probes. The results were correlated with THC whole blood levels during the course of the day, as well as THCCOOH baseline levels. Statistical analyses used analysis of variance and covariance and t-tests, or non-parametric equivalents for those values which were not normally distributed. RESULTS There were no differences in background baseline characteristics of the participants except that the higher concentration THC group was older than the low concentration and placebo groups, and the low concentration THC group had higher baseline CB2 mRNA levels. Both the 5.9 and 13.4% THC groups showed increased THC blood levels that then decreased toward baseline within the first hour. However, there were no significant differences between THC blood levels between the 5.9 and 13.4% groups at any time point. At the 4-h time point after drug administration the 13.4% THC group had higher CB2 (P = 0.021) and DNMT3A (P = 0.027) mRNA levels than the placebo group. DNMT1 mRNA levels showed a trend in the same direction (P = 0.056). The higher 13.4% THC group had significantly increased CB2 mRNA levels than the 5.9% concentration group at several post drug administration time points and showed trends for difference in effects for between 5.9 and 13.4% THC groups for other mRNAs. TET3 mRNA levels were higher in the 13.4% THC group at 55 min post-cannabis ingestion. When the high and lower concentration THC groups were combined, none of the differences in mRNA levels from placebo remained statistically significant. Changes in THC blood levels were not related to changes in mRNA levels. CONCLUSION Over the time course of this study, CB2 mRNA increased in blood lymphocytes in the high concentration THC group but were not accompanied by changes in immunological markers. The changes in DNMT and TET mRNAs suggest potential epigenetic effects of THC in human lymphocytes. Increases in DNMT methylating enzymes have been linked to some of the pathophysiological processes in schizophrenia and, therefore, should be further explored in a larger sample population, as one of the potential mechanisms linking cannabis use as a trigger for schizophrenia in vulnerable individuals. Since the two THC groups did not differ in post-smoking blood THC concentrations, the relationship between lymphocytic changes and the THC content of the cigarettes remains to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert C Smith
- Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, United States.,Department of Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Henry Sershen
- Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, United States.,Department of Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - David S Janowsky
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Abel Lajtha
- Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, United States.,Department of Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Matthew Grieco
- Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, United States
| | - Jon A Gangoiti
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Ilya Gertsman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Wynnona S Johnson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Thomas D Marcotte
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - John M Davis
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric Institute, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|