Inhalation Injury: Unmet Clinical Needs and Future Research

Inhalation Injury, Respiratory Failure, and Ventilator Support in Acute Burn Care

Sustaining an inhalation injury increases the risk of severe complications and mortality. Current evidential support to guide treatment of the injury or subsequent complications is lacking, as studies either exclude inhalation injury or design limit inferences that can be made. Conventional ventilator modes are most commonly used, but there is no consensus on optimal strategies. Settings should be customized to patient tolerance and response. Data for pharmacotherapy adjunctive treatments are limited.

An Introduction to Burn Care: The Sequel

GENERAL PURPOSE

To review burn care, with an emphasis on burn-specific issues and treatment.

TARGET AUDIENCE

This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES

After participating in this educational activity, the participant will:1. Select the appropriate treatment guidelines for patients who have burn injuries.2. Identify common complications of major burns.3. Choose the recommended pharmacologic approaches to burn care.

Inhalation Injury Severity Score on Admission Predicts Overall Survival in Burn Patients

Inhalation injury is diagnosed in up to one-third of burn patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. There are multiple scoring systems to grade inhalation injury, but no study has evaluated the ability of these scoring systems to predict outcomes of interest such as overall survival. We conducted a prospective, observational study of 99 intubated burn patients who underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy within 24 hr of admission and graded inhalation injury using three scoring systems: abbreviated injury score (AIS), inhalation injury severity score (I-ISS), and mucosal score (MS). Agreement between scoring systems was assessed with Krippendorff's alpha (KA). Multivariable analyses were conducted to determine if variables were associated with overall survival. At admission, median AIS, I-ISS, and MS scores were 2 for all scoring systems. Patients who died had higher overall injury burden than those who survived and had similar median admission AIS and MS scores, but higher I-ISS scores. There was strong correlation between the inhalation injury grade at admission using the three scoring systems (KA = 0.85). On regression analysis, the only scoring system independently associated with overall survival was I-ISS (score 3 compared to scores 1-2: OR 13.16, 95% CI 1.65-105.07; P = .02). Progression of injury after initial assessment may contribute to the poor correlation between admission score and overall survival for injuries graded with AIS and MS. Repeated assessment may more accurately identify patients at increased risk for mortality.

Machine learning approach for predicting inhalation injury in patients with burns

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease pandemic has had a tangible impact on bronchoscopy for burn inpatients due to isolation and triage measures. We utilised the machine-learning approach to identify risk factors for predicting mild and severe inhalation injury and whether patients with burns experienced inhalation injury. We also examined the ability of two dichotomous models to predict clinical outcomes including mortality, pneumonia, and duration of hospitalisation.

METHODS

A retrospective 14-year single-centre dataset of 341 intubated patients with burns with suspected inhalation injury was established. The medical data on day one of admission and bronchoscopy-diagnosed inhalation injury grade were compiled using a gradient boosting-based machine-learning algorithm to create two prediction models: model 1, mild vs. severe inhalation injury; and model 2, no inhalation injury vs. inhalation injury.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) for model 1 was 0·883, indicating excellent discrimination. The AUC for model 2 was 0·862, indicating acceptable discrimination. In model 1, the incidence of pneumonia (P < 0·001) and mortality rate (P < 0·001), but not duration of hospitalisation (P = 0·1052), were significantly higher in patients with severe inhalation injury. In model 2, the incidence of pneumonia (P < 0·001), mortality (P < 0·001), and duration of hospitalisation (P = 0·021) were significantly higher in patients with inhalation injury.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed the first machine-learning tool for differentiating between mild and severe inhalation injury, and the absence/presence of inhalation injury in patients with burns, which is helpful when bronchoscopy is not available immediately. The dichotomous classification predicted by both models was associated with the clinical outcomes.

A Rationale for Safe Ventilation with Inhalation Injury: An Editorial Review

Lung injury from smoke inhalation manifests as airway and parenchymal damage, at times leading to the acute respiratory distress syndrome. From the beginning of this millennium, the approach to mechanical ventilation in the patient with ARDS was based on reduction of tidal volume to 6 milliliters/kilogram of ideal body weight, maintaining a ceiling of plateau pressure, and titration of driving pressure (plateau pressure minus PEEP). Beyond these broad constraints, there is little specification for the mechanics of ventilator settings, consideration of the metabolic impact of the disease process on the patient, or interaction of patient disease and ventilator settings. Various studies suggest that inhomogeneity of lung injury, which increases the risk of regional lung trauma from mechanical ventilation, may be found in the patient with smoke inhalation. We now appreciate that energy transfer principles may affect optimal ventilator management and come into play in damaged heterogenous lungs. Mechanical ventilation in the patient with inhalation injury should consider various factors. Self-injurious respiratory demand by the patient can be reduced using analgesia and sedation. Dynamic factors beginning with rate management can reduce the incidence of potentially damaging ventilation. Moreover, preclinical study is underway to examine the flow of gas based on the ventilator mode selected, which may also be a factor triggering regional lung injury.

Standards in Biologic Lesions: Cutaneous Thermal Injury and Inhalation Injury Working Group 2018 Meeting Proceedings

On August 27 and 28, 2018, the American Burn Association, in conjunction with Underwriters Laboratories, convened a group of experts on burn and inhalation injury in Washington, DC. The goal of the meeting was to identify and discuss the existing knowledge, data, and modeling gaps related to understanding cutaneous thermal injury and inhalation injury due to exposure from a fire environment, and in addition, address two more areas proposed by the American Burn Association Research Committee that are critical to burn care but may have current translational research gaps (inflammatory response and hypermetabolic response). Representatives from the Underwriters Laboratories Firefighter Safety Research Institute and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Fire Research Laboratory presented the state of the science in their fields, highlighting areas that required further investigation and guidance from the burn community. Four areas were discussed by the full 24 participant group and in smaller groups: Basic and Translational Understanding of Inhalation Injury, Thermal Contact and Resulting Injury, Systemic Inflammatory Response and Resuscitation, and Hypermetabolic Response and Healing. A primary finding was the need for validating historic models to develop a set of reliable data on contact time and temperature and resulting injury. The working groups identified common areas of focus across each subtopic, including gaining an understanding of individual response to injury that would allow for precision medicine approaches. Predisposed phenotype in response to insult, the effects of age and sex, and the role of microbiomes could all be studied by employing multi-omic (systems biology) approaches.

Inhalation Injury is Associated with Endotheliopathy and Abnormal Fibrinolytic Phenotypes in Burn Patients: A Cohort Study

Burn injury is associated with endothelial dysfunction and coagulopathy and concomitant inhalation injury increases morbidity and mortality. The aim of this work is to identify associations between inhalation injury (IHI), coagulation homeostasis, vascular endothelium, and clinical outcomes in burn patients. One-hundred and twelve patients presenting to a regional burn center were included in this retrospective cohort study. Whole blood was collected at set intervals from admission through 24 hours and underwent viscoelastic assay with rapid TEG (rTEG). Syndecan-1 (SDC-1) on admission was quantified by ELISA. Patients were grouped by the presence (n=28) or absence (n=84) of concomitant IHI and rTEG parameters, fibrinolytic phenotypes, SDC-1, and clinical outcomes were compared. Of the 112 thermally injured patients, 28 (25%) had IHI. Most patients were male (68.8%) with a median age of 40 (IQR, 29-57) years. Patients with IHI had higher overall mortality (42.68% vs. 8.3%; p<0.0001). rTEG LY30 was lower in patients with IHI at hours 4 and 12 (p<0.05). There was a pattern of increased abnormal fibrinolytic phenotypes among IHI patients. There was a greater proportion of IHI patients with endotheliopathy (SDC-1 > 34 ng/mL) (64.7% vs. 26.4%; p=0.008). There was a pattern of increased mortality among patients with inhalation injury and endotheliopathy (0% vs. 72.7%; p=0.004). Significant differences between patients with and without IHI were found in measures assessing fibrinolytic potential and endotheliopathy. Mortality was associated with abnormal fibrinolysis, endotheliopathy, and inhalation injury. However, the extent to which IHI associated dysfunction is independent of TBSA burn size remains to be elucidated.

An Analysis of Airway Interventions in the Setting of Smoke Inhalation Injury on the Battlefield

INTRODUCTION

The Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care and Capabilities Development and Integration Directorate cite airway burn injuries as an indication for prehospital cricothyrotomy. We sought to build on previously published data by describing for the first time the incidence of prehospital airway interventions in combat casualties who received airway management in the setting of inhalational injuries.15,26 We hypothesized that (1) airway interventions in combat casualties who suffered inhalational injury would have a higher mortality rate than those without airway intervention and (2) prehospital cricothyrotomy was used with greater incidence than endotracheal intubation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a previously described Department of Defense Trauma Registry dataset from January 2007 to August 2016, unique casualties with documented inhalational injury were identified.

RESULTS

Our predefined search codes captured 28,222 (72.8% of all encounters in the registry) of those subjects. A total of 347 (1.2%) casualties had a documented inhalational injury, 27 (7.8%) of those with at least 1 prehospital airway intervention inhalational injuries (0.09% of our dataset [n = 28,222]). Within the subset of patients with an inhalation injury, 23 underwent intubation, 2 underwent cricothyrotomy, 3 had placement of an airway adjunct not otherwise specifically listed, and 1 casualty had both a cricothyrotomy and intubation documented. No casualties had a supraglottic, nasopharyngeal, or oropharyngeal airway listed. Contrary to our hypotheses, of those with an airway intervention, 74.0% survived to hospital discharge. In multivariable regression models, when adjusting for confounders, there was no difference in survival to discharge in those with an airway intervention compared to those without.

CONCLUSIONS

Casualties undergoing airway intervention for inhalation injuries had similar survival adjusting for injury severity, supporting its role when indicated. Without case-specific data on airway status and interventions, it is challenging to determine if the low rate of cricothyrotomy in this population was a result of rapid transport to a more advanced provider capable of performing intubation or cricothyrotomy may not be meeting the needs of the medics.

Acute respiratory failure and burn patient outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advances in the care of inhalational injuries have not kept pace with advances that have been seen in the treatment of cutaneous burns. There is not yet a standard of care for best outcomes for airway management of patients with known or suspected inhalational injuries. Clinicians must decide if to intubate the patient, and if so, whether to intubate early or late in their presentation. Unnecessary intubation affects morbidity and mortality. This review will summarize literature that highlights present practices in the treatment of patients with inhalation injuries.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been promising investigations into biomarkers that can be used to quantify a patient's risk and better target therapies. Grading systems serve to better stratify the burn victim's prognosis and then direct their care. Special ventilator modes can assist in ventilating burn patients with inhalation injuries that experience difficulties in oxygenating.

SUMMARY

Inhalational injuries are a significant source of morbidity and mortality in thermally injured patients. Treatment modalities, such as modified ventilator settings, alteration in fluid resuscitation, and a standardized grading system may improve morbidity and mortality.

Bronchoalveolar lavage and plasma Antithrombin and cytokines in inhalation and burn injury: a pilot study

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is initiated during the acute phase of thermal injury. The objective was to determine the SIRS impact on cytokine and Antithrombin (AT) levels in smoke inhalation and burn injury. This observational pilot study compared plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) cytokine and AT levels in the first six days post smoke inhalation and burn injury. Twenty-five patients, 14 with inhalation + burn injury > 10% total body surface area (TBSA) and 11 with inhalation injury and ≤ 10% TBSA participated. Human Th1/Th2 cytometric bead array kit from BD Biosciences Pharmingen determined cytokine levels; AT levels with Sigma Diagnostics and spectrophotometry. Results indicated no significant age difference between the two groups (42.1 ± 7.2) versus 49.6 ± 6.4 years. On admission, the inhalation group had 5.4 ± 3.9% TBSA compared to 35.0 ± 22.2% TBSA in the inhalation + burn group, P < 0.001. Comparing groups, AT plasma levels were significantly decreased (P = 0.025) and IL-2 levels significantly increased (P = 0.025) in the inhalation + burn group compared to the inhalation group; there was no significant difference in BAL AT or cytokine levels. Combined group plasma AT levels (65.41 ± 4.44%) were significantly increased compared to BAL AT levels (1.06 ± 0.71%), P < 0.001. In contrast, BAL TNF-α levels (35.61 ± 16.01 pg/ml) were significantly increased in relation to the plasma levels (4.68 ± 1.27 pg/ml), P = 0.02. On days 1-2, AT plasma levels were significantly decreased in the inhalation + burn group (41.01 ± 5.24%) compared to the inhalation group (81.02 ± 10.99%), P = 0.002. IL-6 plasma levels were higher in the inhalation + burn group compared to the inhalation group on admission, but both levels decreased by days 3-6. IL-6 BAL levels were elevated in both groups on days 1-2 and decreased by days 3-6. In the first six days of resuscitation, all plasma cytokines were increased in the two groups compared to controls. AT plasma and BAL levels were significantly reduced in both groups, contributing to the coagulopathy. Increased BAL TNF-α and IL-6 levels may have contributed to the pulmonary perturbations during the initial SIRS response in both groups.

Microbiome in the setting of burn patients: implications for infections and clinical outcomes

Burn damage can lead to a state of immune dysregulation that facilitates the development of infections in patients. The most deleterious impact of this dysfunction is the loss of the skin’s natural protective barrier. Furthermore, the risk of infection is exacerbated by protracted hospitalization, urinary catheters, endotracheal intubation, inhalation injury, arterial lines and central venous access, among other mainstays of burn care. Currently, infections comprise the leading cause of mortality after major burn injuries, which highlights the improvements observed over the last 50 years in the care provided to burn victims. The need to implement the empirical selection of antibiotic therapy to treat multidrug-resistant bacteria may concomitantly lead to an overall pervasiveness of difficult-to-treat pathogens in burn centres, as well as the propagation of antimicrobial resistance and the ultimate dysregulation of a healthy microbiome. While preliminary studies are examining the variability and evolution of human and mice microbiota, both during the early and late phase burn injury, one must consider that abnormal microbiome conditions could influence the systemic inflammatory response. A better understanding of the changes in the post-burn microbiome might be useful to interpret the provenance and subsequent development of infections, as well as to come up with inferences on the prognosis of burn patients. This review aims to summarise the current findings describing the microbiological changes in different organs and systems of burn patients and how these alterations affect the risks of infections, complications, and, ultimately, healing.