Gustation in insects: taste qualities and types of evidence used to show taste function of specific body parts

A bitter taste receptor liganded by oxalic acid inhibits brown planthopper feeding by promoting CREB phosphorylation via the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway

Insect gustatory receptors play a critical role in modulating feeding behaviors by detecting external nutritional cues through complex biochemical pathways. Bitter taste receptors are essential for insects to identify and avoid toxins. However, the detailed molecular and cellular mechanisms by which these receptors influence insect feeding behavior remain poorly understood. Our previous research identified the bitter taste receptor NlGr23a in the brown planthopper (BPH), which specifically binds to oxalic acid and elicits a significant feeding rejection response. In this study, using an Sf9 cell line stably expressing NlGr23a, we demonstrated that oxalic acid exposure significantly enhances phosphorylation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element-binding protein (CREB), a protein associated with BPH food consumption. Further analysis revealed the involvement of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-protein kinase B (AKT) signaling pathway in facilitating CREB phosphorylation upon activation by oxalic acid-NlGr23a binding. These in vitro findings were corroborated by in vivo experiments examining the expression profiles of relevant proteins and protein kinases in BPHs fed an oxalic acid-supplemented diet. Our results elucidate the biochemical cascades triggered by oxalic acid-NlGr23a interaction, advancing our understanding of insect gustatory receptor-mediated feeding behavior modulation and potentially informing novel strategies for integrated pest management.

Botanical Antifeedants: An Alternative Approach to Pest Control

Plant protection against phytophagous pests still largely relies on the application of synthetic insecticides, which can lead to environmental and health risks that are further exacerbated by the development of resistant pest populations. These are the driving forces behind the current trend of research and the development of new ecological insecticides. The mode of action does not have to rely exclusively on acute or chronic toxicity. Another promising approach is the use of plant antifeedants, which can significantly reduce the food intake of phytophagous insects. However, the information on antifeedant substances has not yet been sufficiently evaluated. The aim of this review was to find the most promising plants that provide potent extracts, essential oils (EOs), or isolated compounds with antifeedant properties. The selection was based on a comparison of effective concentrations or doses. Effective extracts were obtained from 85 plant species belonging to 35 families and the EOs came from 38 aromatic plant species from 11 families. Based on the results, Angelica archangelica, Caesalpinia bonduc, Grindelia camporum, Inula auriculata, Lavandula luisieri, Mentha pulegium, Piper hispidinervum, and Vitis vinifera were selected as promising plants with antifeedant potential. These plants are potent antifeedants, and at the same time provide sufficient biomass for industrial use in the development and production of botanical antifeedants.

The Hawkmoth Proboscis: An Insect Model for Sensorimotor Control of Reaching and Exploration

Reaching and inspecting objects is an intricate part of human life, which is shared by a diversity of animals across phyla. In addition to appendages like legs and antennae, some insects use their mouthparts to reach and inspect targets. Hawkmoths of the family Sphingidae (Lepidoptera) use their extremely long and straw-like proboscis to drink nectar from flowers. As they approach flowers, hawkmoths uncoil their proboscis and explore the floral surface while hovering to target the proboscis to the nectary hole. Several sensory modalities provide feedback to control and guide these extremely versatile proboscis movements. The control task faced by the hawkmoths' nervous system during such behaviors is not unlike that of an animal guiding limbs or a robotic agent guiding a manipulator to a target. Hawkmoths perform these reaching maneuvers while simultaneously hovering, and hence require rapid and continuous coordination between the proboscis, neck, and flight motor systems, thereby providing a unique invertebrate model for studying appendage guidance and reaching. Here, we review what is known about how hawkmoths use their proboscis for floral inspection and nectar discovery, as well as the role of various sensors in proboscis guidance. We give a brief overview of the morphology and muscular apparatus of the hawkmoth proboscis, and discuss how multimodal sensory feedback might be turned into motor action for appendage guidance.

Specialized structure and function of the apical extracellular matrix at sense organs

Apical extracellular matrix (aECM) covers every surface of the body and exhibits tissue-specific structures that carry out specialized functions. This is particularly striking at sense organs, where aECM forms the interface between sensory neurons and the environment, and thus plays critical roles in how sensory stimuli are received. Here, we review the extraordinary adaptations of aECM across sense organs and discuss how differences in protein composition and matrix structure assist in sensing mechanical forces (tactile hairs, campaniform sensilla, and the tectorial membrane of the cochlea); tastes and smells (uniporous gustatory sensilla and multiporous olfactory sensilla in insects, and salivary and olfactory mucus in vertebrates); and light (cuticle-derived lenses in arthropods and mollusks). We summarize the power of using C. elegans, in which defined sense organs associate with distinct aECM, as a model for understanding the tissue-specific structural and functional specializations of aECM. Finally, we synthesize results from recent studies in C. elegans and Drosophila into a conceptual framework for aECM patterning, including mechanisms that involve transient cellular or matrix scaffolds, mechanical pulling or pushing forces, and localized secretion or endocytosis.

The temporal-spatial expression and functional analysis of three gustatory receptor genes in Solenopsis invicta using sweet and bitter compounds

The insect gustatory system participates in identifying potential food sources and avoiding toxic compounds. During this process, gustatory receptors (GRs) recognize feeding stimulant and deterrent compounds. However, the GRs involved in recognizing stimulant and deterrent compounds in the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, remain unknown. Therefore, we conducted a study on the genes SinvGR1, SinvGR32b, and SinvGR28a to investigate the roles of GRs in detecting feeding stimulant and deterrent compounds. In this current study, we found that sucrose and fructose are feeding stimulants and the bitter compound quinine is a feeding deterrent. The fire ant workers showed significant behavior changes to avoid the bitter taste in feeding stimulant compounds. Reverse transcription quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction results from developmental stages showed that the SinvGR1, SinvGR32b, and SinvGR28a genes were highly expressed in fire ant workers. Tissue-specific expression profiles indicated that SinvGR1, SinvGR32b, and SinvGR28a were specifically expressed in the antennae and foreleg tarsi of workers, whereas SinvGR32b gene transcripts were also highly accumulated in the male antennae. Furthermore, the silencing of SinvGR1 or SinvGR32b alone and the co-silencing of both genes disrupted worker stimulation and feeding on sucrose and fructose. The results also showed that SinvGR28a is required for avoiding quinine, as workers with knockdown of the SinvGR28a gene failed to avoid and fed on quinine. This study first identified stimulant and deterrent compounds of fire ant workers and then the GRs involved in the taste recognition of these compounds. This study could provide potential target gustatory genes for the control of the fire ant.

Ovipositional responses of tortricid moths to sugars, salts and neem oil

Oviposition is essential in the life history of insects and is mainly mediated by chemical and tactile cues present on the plant surface. Oviposition deterrents or stimulants can modify insect oviposition and be employed in pest control. Relatively few gustatory oviposition stimuli have been described for tortricid moths. In this study the effect of NaCl, KCl, sucrose, fructose and neem oil on the number of eggs laid by Cydia pomonella (L.), Grapholita molesta (Busck) and Lobesia botrana (Dennis & Schifermüller) was tested in laboratory arenas containing filter papers loaded with 3 doses of a given stimulus and solvent control. In general, salts increased oviposition at the mid dose (102 M) and sugars reduced it at the highest dose (103 mM), but these effects depended on the species. Neem oil dramatically reduced the number of eggs laid as the dose increased, but the lowest neem oil dose (0.1% v/v) increased L. botrana oviposition relative to solvent control. Our study shows that ubiquitous plant chemicals modify tortricid moth oviposition under laboratory conditions, and that neem oil is a strong oviposition deterrent. The oviposition arena developed in this study is a convenient tool to test the effect of tastants on the oviposition behavior of tortricid moths.

What are olfaction and gustation, and do all animals have them?

Different animals have distinctive anatomical and physiological properties to their chemical senses that enhance detection and discrimination of relevant chemical cues. Humans and other vertebrates are recognized as having 2 main chemical senses, olfaction and gustation, distinguished from each other by their evolutionarily conserved neuroanatomical organization. This distinction between olfaction and gustation in vertebrates is not based on the medium in which they live because the most ancestral and numerous vertebrates, the fishes, live in an aquatic habitat and thus both olfaction and gustation occur in water and both can be of high sensitivity. The terms olfaction and gustation have also often been applied to the invertebrates, though not based on homology. Consequently, any similarities between olfaction and gustation in the vertebrates and invertebrates have resulted from convergent adaptations or shared constraints during evolution. The untidiness of assigning olfaction and gustation to invertebrates has led some to recommend abandoning the use of these terms and instead unifying them and others into a single category-chemical sense. In our essay, we compare the nature of the chemical senses of diverse animal types and consider their designation as olfaction, oral gustation, extra-oral gustation, or simply chemoreception. Properties that we have found useful in categorizing chemical senses of vertebrates and invertebrates include the nature of peripheral sensory cells, organization of the neuropil in the processing centers, molecular receptor specificity, and function.