When cancer encounters COVID-19 in China: what have we suffered, experienced and learned

Challenges in Treating Pediatric Cancer Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Balancing Risks and Care

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in millions of fatalities worldwide. The case of pediatric cancer patients stands out since, despite being considered a population at risk, few studies have been carried out concerning symptom detection or the description of the mechanisms capable of modifying the course of the COVID-19 disease, such as the interaction and response between the virus and the treatment given to cancer patients. By synthesizing existing studies, this paper aims to expose the treatment challenges for pediatric patients with COVID-19 in an oncology context. Additionally, this updated review includes studies that utilized the antiviral agents Remdesivir and PaxlovidTM in pediatric cancer patients. There is no specific treatment designed exclusively for pediatric cancer patients dealing with COVID-19, and it is advisable to avoid self-medication to prevent potential side effects. Managing COVID-19 in pediatric cancer patients is indeed a substantial challenge. New strategies, such as chemotherapy application rooms, have been implemented for children with cancer who were positive for COVID-19 but asymptomatic since the risk of disease progression is greater than the risk of complications from SARS-CoV-2.

Implementation of a hospital-at-home (HAH) unit for hematological patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: safety and feasibility

Background

“Hospital-at-home” (HAH) programs have been shown to optimize resource utilization, shorten hospitalization and prevent nosocomial infection.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed data regarding implementation of an HAH unit for caring patients with hematological malignancies in our center, during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results

Between January and November 2020, 105 patients were treated in the HAH unit for a total of 204 episodes. Nine patients with multiple myeloma (MM) received autologous HSCT (auto-HSCT). Three patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) received consolidation therapy, 32 patients underwent clinical and analytical monitoring, 20 were transplant recipients early discharged (5 auto-HSCT and 15 allo-HSCT) and 2 had received CART cells therapy. Azacitidine, bortezomib and carfilzomib were administered at home to 54 patients with AML, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or MM. A median of 17 (IQR 13–19) days of admission per patient and a total of 239 visits to the Hematology day-care hospital were avoided. Overall, 28 patients (14% of all episodes) needed admission to the hospital, 4 of them due to COVID-19.

Conclusions

Implementation of a Hematology HAH unit was feasible and safe, and provided thorough advanced care to a high-risk population. Advanced care-at-home strategies can be crucial during times of COVID-19 to minimize treatment interruptions and reduce the risk of cross-infections.

Safeguarding COVID-19 and cancer management: drug design and therapeutic approach

Recent clinical cohort studies have highlighted that there is a three-fold greater SARS-Cov-2 infection risk in cancer patients, and overall mortality in individuals with tumours is increased by 41% with respect to general COVID-19 patients. Thus, access to therapeutics and intensive care is compromised for people with both diseases (comorbidity) and there is risk of delayed access to diagnosis. This comorbidity has resulted in extensive burden on the treatment of patients and health care system across the globe; moreover, mortality of hospitalized patients with comorbidity is reported to be 30% higher than for individuals affected by either disease. In this data-driven review, we aim specifically to address drug discoveries and clinical data of cancer management during the COVID-19 pandemic. The review will extensively address the treatment of COVID-19/cancer comorbidity; treatment protocols and new drug discoveries, including the description of drugs currently available in clinical settings; demographic features; and COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients worldwide.

Apatinib with etoposide capsules as a third- or further-line therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II trial

Background

Patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have a particularly poor prognosis. And the treatment options for patients with relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC are limited. Thus, we conducted an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus etoposide capsules as the third- or further-line treatment in ES-SCLC patients.

Methods

Patients with ES-SCLC who experienced disease progression following 2 to 3 previous therapies from 11 medical centers in China were enrolled to receive apatinib (250 mg/d, continuously) and etoposide capsules (50 mg/d, on day 1–21, per 28 days). The treatment continued until disease progression, treatment intolerance, or death. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

Fifty-six patients with relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC were enrolled from January 2018 to February 2020 and 53 of them were eventually included in the evaluation population. The median follow-up was 9.8 months. At the data cut-off time (March 5, 2020), 39 patients (74%) had died and 44 (83%) had progressed. The median PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.1–3.9) and the median OS was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.6–6.4). No complete responses were seen. Eleven patients (21%) showed a best response of partial response and 37 (70%) patients achieved stable disease. The ORR was 20.8% (11/53), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 90.6% (48/53). The 6-month OS rate was 40.1% (95% CI, 26.2–54). After 12 months, the OS rate was 18.4% (95% CI, 4.7–32.1). Possible treatment-related grade III/IV adverse events included leukopenia [8 (15.1%)], neutropenia [7 (13.2%)], anemia [4 (7.4%)], and hand-foot syndrome [2 (3.8%)]. During the study, no mortality occurred as a consequence of treatment.

Conclusions

Apatinib combined with etoposide capsules exhibits efficacy and has an acceptable safety profile. It could be used as a later-line treatment for ES-SCLC patients who have been heavily pretreated with standard therapies. Further exploration of apatinib combined with etoposide capsules in phase III trials is warranted.

Cancer therapy and treatments during COVID-19 era

The COVID-19 pandemic has put a serious strain on health treatments as well at the economies of many nations. Unfortunately, there is not currently available vaccine for SARS-Cov-2/COVID-19. Various types of patients have delayed treatment or even routine check-ups and we are adapting to a virtual world. In many cases, surgeries are delayed unless they are essential. This is also true with regards to cancer treatments and screening. Interestingly, some existing drugs and nutraceuticals have been screened for their effects on COVID-19. Certain FDA approved drugs, vitamin, natural products and trace minerals may be repurposed to treat or improve the prevention of COVID-19 infections and disease progression. This review article will summarize how the treatments of various cancer patients has changed during the COVID-19 era as well as discuss the promise of some existing drugs and other agents to be repurposed to treat this disease.

Cancer in the Time of Coronavirus: A Call for Crisis Oncology Standards of Care

Since the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) was identified as a global pandemic, health systems have been severely strained, particularly affecting vulnerable populations such as patients with cancer. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a variety of oncology specialty societies are making recommendations for standards of care. These diverse standards and gaps in standards can lead to inconsistent and heterogeneous care among governments, cancer centers, and even among oncologists within the same practice. These challenges highlight the need for a common nomenclature and crisis guidelines. For times of increased scarcity of resources, the National Academy of Medicine developed Crisis Standards of Care, defined as fairness, duty to care, duty to steward resources, transparency, consistency, proportionality, and accountability. However, we believe there is an urgent need to develop cancer-specific guidelines by convening a panel of experts from multiple specialties. These would be Crisis Oncology Standards of Care (COSCs) that are sensitive to both the individual cancer patient and to the broader health system in times of scarce resources, such as pandemic, natural disaster, or supply chain disruptions.