1
|
Miyake M, Nishimura N, Oda Y, Miyamoto T, Iida K, Inoue K, Tachibana A, Yoshikawa T, Sakamoto K, Ohnishi M, Maesaka F, Takamatsu N, Mieda K, Ohmori C, Matsubara T, Tomizawa M, Shimizu T, Ohnishi K, Hori S, Morizawa Y, Gotoh D, Nakai Y, Torimoto K, Tanaka N, Fujimoto K. Difference of oncological efficacy between two immune checkpoint inhibitors following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with unresectable, metastatic, advanced urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter real-world Japanese cohort. Int J Clin Oncol 2024; 29:1311-1325. [PMID: 38888683 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02573-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maintenance avelumab is currently recommended for patients with unresectable and/or metastatic (mUC) achieving at least stable disease (SD) on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (1L-CT). Pembrolizumab is an alternative therapeutic avenue for this patient cohort in clinical practice. We investigated real-world data, focusing on the correlation between response to 1L-CT and oncological efficacy of subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with avelumab or pembrolizumab. METHODS A multicenter database registered 626 patients with mUC diagnosed from 2008-2023; among these, 175 receiving 2-6 cycles of 1L-CT followed by ICI therapy. Patients were categorized based on response to 1L-CT using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (v1.1). Objective response rate on ICI, progression to ICI-free survival (ICI-PFS), and overall survival from start of 1L-CT were compared between avelumab-treated and pembrolizumab-treated patients in each response subgroup. RESULTS ICI-PFS was significantly longer in patients achieving partial response on 1L-CT and subsequently receiving pembrolizumab compared to those receiving avelumab. Notably, patients achieving SD on 1L-CT and subsequently receiving pembrolizumab manifested significantly higher objective response rate (14% and 41%, respectively) and prolonged ICI-PFS relative to those receiving avelumab. In contrast, overall survival did not delineate difference between patients treated with avelumab versus pembrolizumab. Similar findings were discerned in the subanalysis of patients having favorable SD (tumor shrinkage, from - 29 to 0%) and unfavorable SD (tumor enlargement, from + 1 to + 19%) on 1L-CT. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides real-world evidence regarding difference of oncological efficacy between maintenance avelumab and subsequent pembrolizumab in patients with mUC who achieved partial response or SD on 1L-CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
| | - Nobutaka Nishimura
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
- Department of Urology, Hirao Hospital, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Yuki Oda
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | | | - Kota Iida
- Department of Urology, Tane General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kuniaki Inoue
- Department of Urology, Osaka Gyoumeikan Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akira Tachibana
- Department of Urology, Hoshigaoka Medical Center, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Keichi Sakamoto
- Department of Urology, Osaka Kaisei Hospital, Yodogawa, Osaka, 532-0003, Japan
| | | | | | - Norimi Takamatsu
- Department of Urology, Yamatotakada Municipal Hospital, Yamatotakada, Nara, Japan
| | - Kosuke Mieda
- Department of Urology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan
| | - Chihiro Ohmori
- Department of Urology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Matsubara
- Department of Urology, Matsusaka Chuo General Hospital, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Tomizawa
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Takuto Shimizu
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Kenta Ohnishi
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Shunta Hori
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Yosuke Morizawa
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Daisuke Gotoh
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Yasushi Nakai
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Torimoto
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Nobumichi Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
- Department of Prostate Brachytherapy, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-Cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8522, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kikuchi E, Hayakawa N, Nakayama M, Uno M, Nakatsu H, Kitagawa C, Miyake H, Yamada T, Fujita K, Shimoyama H, Nishihara K, Kobayashi M, Nakamura M, Fujimoto K, Sano T, Nishiyama N, Ito T, Kajita M, Kobayashi T, Kitamura H. J-AVENUE: A retrospective, real-world study evaluating patient characteristics and outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with avelumab first-line maintenance therapy in Japan. Int J Urol 2024; 31:859-867. [PMID: 38722221 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial showed that avelumab first-line maintenance + best supportive care significantly prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival versus best supportive care alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who were progression-free following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. We report findings from J-AVENUE (NCT05431777), a real-world study of avelumab first-line maintenance therapy in Japan. METHODS Medical charts of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma without disease progression following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, who received avelumab maintenance between February and November 2021, were reviewed. Patients were followed until June 2022. The primary endpoint was patient characteristics; secondary endpoints included time to treatment failure and progression-free survival. RESULTS In 79 patients analyzed, median age was 72 years (range, 44-86). Primary tumor site was upper tract in 45.6% and bladder in 54.4%. The most common first-line chemotherapy regimen was cisplatin + gemcitabine (63.3%). Median number of chemotherapy cycles received was four. Best response to chemotherapy was complete response in 10.1%, partial response in 58.2%, and stable disease in 31.6%. Median treatment-free interval before avelumab was 4.9 weeks. With avelumab first-line maintenance therapy, the disease control rate was 58.2%, median time to treatment failure was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.3-6.4), and median progression-free survival was 6.1 months (95% CI, 3.6-9.7). CONCLUSIONS Findings from J-AVENUE show the effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in Japan in clinical practice, with similar progression-free survival to JAVELIN Bladder 100 and previous real-world studies, supporting its use as a standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eiji Kikuchi
- Department of Urology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Nozomi Hayakawa
- Department of Urology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masashi Nakayama
- Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masahiro Uno
- Department of Urology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | | | - Chiyoe Kitagawa
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hideaki Miyake
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Yamada
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kazutoshi Fujita
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideaki Shimoyama
- Department of Urology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kiyoaki Nishihara
- Department of Urology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | - Motonobu Nakamura
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University Hospital, Nara, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sano
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Naotaka Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences for Research, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Takayuki Ito
- Medical Department, Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd. (an affiliate of Merck KGaA), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kajita
- Oncology Medical Affairs, Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd. (an affiliate of Merck KGaA), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kitamura
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences for Research, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Isobe T, Naiki T, Sugiyama Y, Naiki-Ito A, Nagai T, Etani T, Iida K, Noda Y, Shimizu N, Aoki M, Gonda M, Morikawa T, Banno R, Kubota H, Ando R, Kawai N, Yasui T. Experience and Prognostic Analysis with Avelumab Switch Maintenance Treatment in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. Oncology 2024:1-11. [PMID: 38952143 DOI: 10.1159/000539795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Avelumab (Ave) is approved for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) maintenance therapy and prolongs overall survival (OS). We explored trends related to Ave treatment of mUC patients. METHODS A total of 72 patients with mUC treated with first-line chemotherapy, from January 2019 to November 2022, at our affiliated institutions, were analyzed. We compared clinical parameters and the prognosis of patients treated with Ave (n = 43) because of progression during first-line chemotherapy, with untreated patients (Ave-untreated; n = 29). Among the Ave-treated group, we classified patients showing a complete or partial response or stable disease in their best response to Ave maintenance therapy as Ave-suitable patients; these were retrospectively analyzed. Potential prognostic factors, including the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) for determining patients suitable for Ave, were evaluated. RESULTS The basic clinical parameters of patients when first-line treatment was initiated were not statistically different between the two groups. The Ave-suitable group (median 26.6 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.4-not reached [NR]) showed significantly longer median OS after first-line treatment than the Ave-untreated group (median 12.0 months, 95% CI: 7.5-NR) with tolerable adverse events. The cut-off values of prognostic factors were set by the receiver operating characteristic curve. Low age and GNRI sustainability were revealed as significant prognostic factors for being Ave-suitable both in univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION In mUC, Ave maintenance prolonged OS within tolerable safety profiles. GNRI sustainability may be used as a biomarker to predict being Ave-suitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teruki Isobe
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Taku Naiki
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yosuke Sugiyama
- Department of Pharmacy, Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Aya Naiki-Ito
- Department of Experimental Pathology and Tumor Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takashi Nagai
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Toshiki Etani
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Keitaro Iida
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yusuke Noda
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
- Department of Urology, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Japan
| | - Nobuhiko Shimizu
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Maria Aoki
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masakazu Gonda
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Toshiharu Morikawa
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Rika Banno
- Department of Urology, Konan Kose Hospital, Konan, Japan
| | - Hiroki Kubota
- Department of Urology, Kainan Hospital, Yatomi, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Ando
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Noriyasu Kawai
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yasui
- Department of Nephro-Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Park SH, Shin SJ, Rha SY, Beom SH, Seo HK, Keam B, Kim M, Hong YH, Yoon S, Lee JL. Avelumab first-line maintenance treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: real-world results from a Korean expanded access program. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1403120. [PMID: 38887229 PMCID: PMC11180756 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1403120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of avelumab administered as first-line (1L) maintenance treatment in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) without disease progression after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy. This study provides the first real-world data from Korea regarding avelumab 1L maintenance treatment, comprising data obtained from a nationwide expanded access program (EAP). Methods This open-label EAP was conducted at five centers from September 2021 until June 2023. Eligible patients had unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC and were progression free after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks per local prescribing information. Safety and effectiveness were assessed by treating physicians according to routine practice. Results Overall, 30 patients were enrolled. At initial UC diagnosis, 20 patients (66.7%) had stage 4 disease and 12 (40.0%) had visceral metastases. The most common 1L chemotherapy regimen was gemcitabine + cisplatin (21 patients; 70.0%). All but one patient (96.7%) had received 4-6 cycles of 1L chemotherapy. The median interval from end of 1L chemotherapy to start of avelumab was 4.4 weeks. Median duration of avelumab treatment was 6.2 months (range, 0.9-20.7); nine patients (30.0%) received >12 months of treatment. Adverse events related to avelumab occurred in 21 patients (70.0%) and were grade ≥3 or classified as serious in three patients (10.0%). Median progression-free survival was 7.9 months (95% CI, 4.3-13.1). Overall survival was not analyzed because only one patient died. Conclusion Results from this EAP demonstrated the clinical activity and acceptable safety of avelumab 1L maintenance treatment in Korean patients with advanced UC, consistent with previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Se Hoon Park
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Joon Shin
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Young Rha
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Hoon Beom
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho Kyung Seo
- Department of Urology, Center for Urologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Bhumsuk Keam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Miso Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Shinkyo Yoon
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Lyun Lee
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Miyake M, Nishimura N, Oda Y, Miyamoto T, Ohmori C, Takamatsu N, Itami Y, Tachibana A, Matsumoto Y, Kiba K, Tomioka A, Yamamoto H, Okajima E, Masaomi K, Sakamoto K, Tomizawa M, Shimizu T, Ohnishi K, Hori S, Morizawa Y, Gotoh D, Nakai Y, Torimoto K, Tanaka N, Fujimoto K. Enfortumab vedotin following platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced urothelial carcinoma: response, survival and safety analysis from a multicentre real-world Japanese cohort. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2024; 54:329-338. [PMID: 38061911 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyad170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Real-world evidence regarding enfortumab vedotin for unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma is scarce, particularly in Japan. We investigated real-world data focusing on patient background, previous treatments, response, survival and adverse events in patients receiving enfortumab vedotin. METHODS A multicentre database was used to register 556 patients diagnosed with metastatic urothelial carcinoma from 2008 to 2023; 34 patients (6.1%) treated with enfortumab vedotin were included. Best radiographic objective responses were evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (v1.1) during treatments. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated (Kaplan-Meier method). Toxicities were reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. The relative dose intensity, which could impact oncological outcomes, was calculated. RESULTS The median number of enfortumab vedotin therapy cycles was 5. The best objective response to enfortumab vedotin was partial response, stable disease and progressive disease in 19 (56%), 5 (15%) and 10 (29%) patients, respectively. The median overall survival and progression-free survival after the first enfortumab vedotin dose were 16 and 9 months, respectively. No significant relationship was observed between survival outcomes after enfortumab vedotin initiation and the enfortumab vedotin relative dose intensity. The median overall survival from first-line platinum-based chemotherapy initiation was 42 months. Twenty-six (76%) patients experienced any grade of enfortumab vedotin-related toxicities; eight (24%) experienced Grades 3-4 toxicities, the most common being skin toxicity (any grade, 47%; Grades 3-4, 12%). CONCLUSIONS Here, we report real-world evidence for enfortumab vedotin therapy in Japan. Tumour responses and safety profiles were comparable with those of clinical trials on this novel treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Nishimura
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
- Department of Urology, Hirao Hospital, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Yuki Oda
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | | | - Chihiro Ohmori
- Department of Urology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Nara, Japan
| | - Norimi Takamatsu
- Department of Urology, Yamatotakada Municipal Hospital, Yamatotakada, Nara, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Itami
- Department of Urology, Tane General Hospital, Osaka, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akira Tachibana
- Department of Urology, Hoshigaoka Medical Center, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Keisuke Kiba
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Nara, Japan
| | - Atsushi Tomioka
- Department of Urology, Saiseikai Chuwa Hospital, Sakurai, Nara, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Minami Nara Medical Center, Yoshino, Nara, Japan
| | - Eijiro Okajima
- Department of Urology, Nara City Hospital, Nara, Nara, Japan
| | - Kuwata Masaomi
- Department of Urology, Matsusaka Chuo General Hospital, Matsusaka, Mie, Japan
| | - Keichi Sakamoto
- Department of Urology, Osaka Kaisei Hospital, Osaka, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Tomizawa
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Takuto Shimizu
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Kenta Ohnishi
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Shunta Hori
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Yosuke Morizawa
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Daisuke Gotoh
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Yasushi Nakai
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Torimoto
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Nobumichi Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
- Department of Prostate Brachytherapy, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
A Bueno AP, Clark O, Turnure M, Moreira ES, Yuasa A, Sugiyama S, Kirker M, Li S, Hou N, Chang J, Kearney M, Kanas G. Treatment patterns in metastatic bladder cancer in Japan: results of the CancerMPact ® survey 2020. Future Oncol 2024; 20:603-611. [PMID: 38214131 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim: To assess physician-reported treatment of metastatic bladder cancer in Japan. Methods: 76 physicians completed the CancerMPact® survey in July 2020, considering patients treated within 6 months. Results: Physicians treated a mean of 38.1 patients per month. Of cisplatin-eligible and -ineligible patients, 97.6 and 89.3%, respectively, received first-line platinum-based therapy, most commonly cisplatin plus gemcitabine (72.9%) and carboplatin plus gemcitabine (59.7%). 1.6 and 5.6% received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors, respectively. 48.4 and 45.0%, respectively, progressed and received second-line therapy, most commonly with pembrolizumab (61.7%). Conclusion: In 2020, most patients with metastatic bladder cancer in Japan received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; however, >50% received no subsequent treatment, highlighting the need for new treatment regimens to improve outcomes and maximize first-line treatment benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Paula A Bueno
- Cerner Enviza, An Oracle Company, Av. das Nações Unidas 14171 15º andar, Morumbi São Paulo/SP CEP, 04794-000, Brazil
| | - Otavio Clark
- Cerner Enviza, An Oracle Company, 2300 Oracle Wy, Austin, TX 78741, USA
| | - Matthew Turnure
- Cerner Enviza, An Oracle Company, 2300 Oracle Wy, Austin, TX 78741, USA
| | - Eloisa S Moreira
- Cerner Enviza, An Oracle Company, Av. das Nações Unidas 14171 15º andar, Morumbi São Paulo/SP CEP, 04794-000, Brazil
| | - Akira Yuasa
- Pfizer Japan Inc, 3-22-7 Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8589, Japan
| | - Shigeru Sugiyama
- Pfizer Japan Inc, 3-22-7 Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8589, Japan
| | | | - Si Li
- Pfizer Inc, 235 E 42nd St, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Ningqi Hou
- Pfizer Inc, 235 E 42nd St, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Jane Chang
- Pfizer Inc, 235 E 42nd St, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Mairead Kearney
- Merck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250 Darmstadt, 64293, Germany
| | - Gena Kanas
- Cerner Enviza, An Oracle Company, 2300 Oracle Wy, Austin, TX 78741, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Grivas P, Grande E, Davis ID, Moon HH, Grimm MO, Gupta S, Barthélémy P, Thibault C, Guenther S, Hanson S, Sternberg CN. Avelumab first-line maintenance treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma: review of evidence to guide clinical practice. ESMO Open 2023; 8:102050. [PMID: 37976999 PMCID: PMC10685024 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase III trial led to the incorporation of avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance treatment into international guidelines as a standard of care for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) without progression after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy. JAVELIN Bladder 100 showed that avelumab 1L maintenance significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival in this population compared with a 'watch-and-wait' approach. The aim of this manuscript is to review clinical studies of avelumab 1L maintenance in patients with advanced UC, including long-term efficacy and safety data from JAVELIN Bladder 100, subgroup analyses in clinically relevant subpopulations, and 'real-world' data obtained outside of clinical trials, providing a comprehensive resource to support patient management. Extended follow-up from JAVELIN Bladder 100 has shown that avelumab provides a long-term efficacy benefit, with a median OS of 23.8 months measured from start of maintenance treatment, and 29.7 months measured from start of 1L chemotherapy. Longer OS was observed across subgroups, including patients who received 1L cisplatin + gemcitabine, patients who received four or six cycles of 1L chemotherapy, and patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease as best response to 1L induction chemotherapy. No new safety signals were seen in patients who received ≥1 year of avelumab treatment, and toxicity was similar in those who had received cisplatin or carboplatin with gemcitabine. Other clinical datasets, including noninterventional studies conducted in Europe, USA, and Asia, have confirmed the efficacy of avelumab 1L maintenance. Potential subsequent treatment options after avelumab maintenance include antibody-drug conjugates (enfortumab vedotin or sacituzumab govitecan), erdafitinib in biomarker-selected patients, platinum rechallenge in suitable patients, nonplatinum chemotherapy, and clinical trial participation; however, evidence to determine optimal treatment sequences is needed. Ongoing trials of avelumab-based combination regimens as maintenance treatment have the potential to evolve the treatment landscape for patients with advanced UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, USA.
| | - E Grande
- Department of Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - I D Davis
- Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - H H Moon
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Riverside Medical Center, Riverside, USA
| | - M-O Grimm
- Department of Urology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - S Gupta
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, USA
| | - P Barthélémy
- Medical Oncology Unit, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg
| | - C Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP Centre, Paris, France
| | - S Guenther
- Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | - C N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bakaloudi DR, Talukder R, Lin GI, Makrakis D, Diamantopoulos LN, Tripathi N, Agarwal N, Zakopoulou R, Bamias A, Brown JR, Pinato DJ, Korolewicz J, Jindal T, Koshkin VS, Murgić J, Miletić M, Frobe A, Johnson J, Zakharia Y, Drakaki A, Rodriguez-Vida A, Rey-Cárdenas M, Castellano D, Buznego LA, Duran I, Carballeira CC, Barrera RM, Marmorejo D, McKay RR, Stewart T, Gupta S, Ruplin AT, Yu EY, Khaki AR, Grivas P. Response and Outcomes of Maintenance Avelumab After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy (PBC) in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (aUC): "Real World" Experience. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:584-593. [PMID: 37414620 PMCID: PMC11289267 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) followed by avelumab switch maintenance in nonprogressors is standard first line (1L) treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). We describe clinical features and outcomes in a "real-world' cohort treated with avelumab maintenance for aUC. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of patients (pts) who received 1L switch maintenance avelumab after no progression on PBC for aUC. We calculated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from initiation of maintenance avelumab. We also described OS and PFS for specific subsets using Cox regression and observed response rate (ORR). RESULTS A total of 108 pts with aUC from 14 sites treated with maintenance avelumab were included. There was a median of 6 weeks1-30 from end of PBC to avelumab initiation; median follow-up time from avelumab initiation was 8.8 months (1-42.7). Median [m]PFS was 9.6 months (95%CI 7.5-12.1) and estimated 1-year OS was 72.5%. CR/PR (vs. SD) to 1L PBC (HR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.87) and ECOG PS 0 (vs. ≥1), (HR = 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.47) were associated with longer OS. The presence of liver metastases was associated with shorter PFS (HR = 2.32, 95% CI 1.17-4.59). ORR with avelumab maintenance was 28.7% (complete response 17.6%, partial response 11.1%), 29.6% stable disease, 26.9% progressive disease as best response (14.8% best response unknown). CONCLUSIONS Results seem relatively consistent with findings from JAVELIN Bladder100 trial and recent "real world" studies. Prior response to platinum-based chemotherapy, ECOG PS 0, and absence of liver metastases were favorable prognostic factors. Limitations include the retrospective design, lack of randomization and central scan review, and possible selection/confounding biases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rafee Talukder
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Dimitrios Makrakis
- Department of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center-Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Nishita Tripathi
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Jason R Brown
- Division of Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Clevelant, OH
| | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK; Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - James Korolewicz
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Tanya Jindal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jure Murgić
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Marija Miletić
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ana Frobe
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Jeffrey Johnson
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Yousef Zakharia
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Alexandra Drakaki
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alejo Rodriguez-Vida
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar, IMM Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Daniel Castellano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lucia Alonso Buznego
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Marqués of Valdecilla, IDIVAL Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Marqués of Valdecilla, IDIVAL Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Clara Castro Carballeira
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Marqués of Valdecilla, IDIVAL Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Rafael Morales Barrera
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Marmorejo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rana R McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Tyler Stewart
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Evan Y Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Ali R Khaki
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
| |
Collapse
|