Weekly Paclitaxel after failure of gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients with malignant ascites: a retrospective study

Treatment outcomes of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer patients with malignant ascites

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy has been shown to improve the prognosis in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC); however, the efficacy and safety of GnP in PC patients with malignant ascites (MA) remains unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated PC patients with peritoneal dissemination who had received GnP as first-line chemotherapy at our institution between March 2015 and August 2021. The following patient data were reviewed: patient characteristics, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and relative dose intensity (RDI). The severity of MA was categorized based on the CT findings as grade 1 (small), grade 2 (moderate), or grade 3 (massive).

RESULTS

A total of 189 patients were included; the study endpoints were compared between patients with each ascites grade and 41 patients without MA. The MA was classified as grade 1 in 85 patients, grade 2 in 41 patients, and grade 3 in 22 patients. In the patients with MA, the median OS, PFS and ORR were 11.2 months, 5.7 months and 24.3%, respectively. The OS and PFS decreased with increasing the severity of MA; in particular, patients with grade 2 and 3 showed a poorer prognosis. There were no differences in AEs, except for anorexia, or the RDI according to the severity of MA.

CONCLUSION

GnP showed moderate efficacy with manageable safety profile in PC patients with MA. However, PC patients with moderate to massive ascites still have a dismal prognosis, and further development of effective treatments is needed.

Progress in the treatment of malignant ascites

Malignant ascites occurs as a symptom of the terminal stage of cancer, affecting the quality of life through abdominal distension, pain, nausea, anorexia, dyspnea and other symptoms. We describe the current main drug treatments in addition to surgery according to the traditional and new strategies. Traditional treatments were based on anti-tumor chemotherapy and traditional Chinese medicine treatments, as well as diuretics to relieve the patient's symptoms. New treatments mainly involve photothermal therapy, intestinal therapy and targeted immunity. This study emphasizes that both traditional and new therapies have certain advantages and disadvantages, and medication should be adjusted according to different periods of use and different patients. In conclusion, this article reviews the literature to systematically describe the primary treatment modalities for malignant ascites.

Malignant ascites in pancreatic cancer: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, molecular characterization, and therapeutic strategies

Malignant ascites is the accumulation of fluid in the peritoneum as a result of advanced cancer and often signifies the terminal phase of the disease. Management of malignant ascites remains a clinical challenge as symptom palliation is the current standard of cure. Previously, studies examining malignant ascites largely focused on ovarian and gastric cancer. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in research on malignant ascites in pancreatic cancer. Malignant ascites is usually diagnosed based on positive cytology, but cytology is not always diagnostic, indicating the need for novel diagnostic tools and biomarkers. This review aims to summarize the current understanding of malignant ascites in pancreatic cancer and the recent advances in the molecular characterization of malignant ascites fluid from patients with pancreatic cancer including analysis of soluble molecules and extracellular vesicles. Current standard of care treatment options such as paracenteses and diuretics are outlined along with new emerging treatment strategies such as immunotherapy and small-molecule based therapies. New potential investigative directions resulting from these studies are also highlighted.

Intraperitoneal oncolytic virotherapy for patients with malignant ascites: Characterization of clinical efficacy and antitumor immune response

Oncolytic viruses mediate antitumor responses through direct tumor cell lysis and induction of host antitumor immunity. However, the therapeutic efficacy of oncolytic viruses against malignant ascites has rarely been explored. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunomodulatory effect of an intraperitoneal injection of human type 5 recombinant adenovirus (called H101) against malignant ascites. Forty patients with malignant ascites were recruited and treated with intraperitoneal H101 in the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. The 4-week clinical responses were determined by an objective assessment of ascites volume change. The ascites response rate and ascites control rate were 40% (16/40) and 75% (30/40), respectively. The major adverse events following intraperitoneal H101 administration were mild-to-moderate abdominal pain (8/40, 20.0%) and fever (11/40, 27.5%); no grade III/IV adverse events were observed. Mass cytometry and immunocytological analysis at baseline, and days 7 and 14 post-treatment showed that intraperitoneally injected H101 led to marked tumor cell depletion, increased dendritic cell and CD8⁺ T cell densities. H101-meditated tumor-specific immune activation on day 14 post-treatment was further identified by enzyme-linked immunospot assay. In conclusion, intraperitoneal H101 administration was well tolerated and effective in treating malignant ascites; thus, its immune activation ability may be a promising tool in combination with immunotherapy.

Conversion surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer and peritoneal metastasis

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is among the most lethal malignancies globally. We have previously explored the clinical efficacy of intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel therapy for patients with PDAC and peritoneal metastasis, which demonstrated favourable response and disease control rates. However, the real implications of conversion surgery after IP therapy remain unclear.

Methods

We conducted two multicenter clinical trials of IP therapy with paclitaxel in patients with PDAC and peritoneal metastasis. We focused on patients who underwent conversion surgery and investigated the long-term outcomes, particularly, initial recurrence patterns and long-term survival.

Results

Seventy-nine patients with PDAC and peritoneal metastasis were treated, and 33 (41.8%) patients received SP (intravenous IP paclitaxel with S-1) and 46 (58.3%) were administered GAP (intravenous gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel combined with IP paclitaxel) combination therapy. Of the 79 patients, 16 (20.3%) underwent conversion surgery. The median time to surgery was 9.0 (range, 4.1-13.0) months after the initiation of chemotherapy. Finally, 13 (81.3%) patients underwent R0 resection. Evans grade was IIA in nine patients, IIB in four patients, III in two patients, and IV in one patient. The median overall survival time in patients who underwent conversion surgery was 32.5 (range, 13.5-66.9) months. Twelve (75.0%) patients were found to have experienced recurrence after conversion surgery. Especially, peritoneal recurrence was observed in 50% of patients as the initial recurrence pattern. The median recurrence-free survival time was 9.2 (range, 5.1-32.8) months, and three patients have survived without recurrence to date.

Conclusions

Our IP therapy displays promising clinical efficacy with acceptable tolerability in patients with PDAC and peritoneal metastasis. Although we could observe some super-responders in the cohort, further improvements in IP therapy are warranted.

Phase I/II study of adding intraperitoneal paclitaxel in patients with pancreatic cancer and peritoneal metastasis

BACKGROUND

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy using paclitaxel is considered an experimental approach for treating peritoneal carcinomatosis. This study aimed to determine the recommended dose, and to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety, of the combination of intravenous gemcitabine, intravenous nab-paclitaxel and intraperitoneal paclitaxel in patients with pancreatic cancer and peritoneal metastasis.

METHODS

The frequencies of dose-limiting toxicities were evaluated, and the recommended dose was determined in phase I. The primary endpoint of the phase II analysis was overall survival rate at 1 year. Secondary endpoints were antitumour effects, symptom-relieving effects, safety and overall survival.

RESULTS

The recommended doses of intravenous gemcitabine, intravenous nab-paclitaxel and intraperitoneal paclitaxel were 800, 75 and 20 mg/m² respectively. Among 46 patients enrolled in phase II, the median time to treatment failure was 6·0 (range 0-22·6) months. The response and disease control rates were 21 of 43 and 41 of 43 respectively. Ascites disappeared in 12 of 30 patients, and cytology became negative in 18 of 46. The median survival time was 14·5 months, and the 1-year overall survival rate was 61 per cent. Conversion surgery was performed in eight of 46 patients, and those who underwent resection survived significantly longer than those who were not treated surgically (median survival not reached versus 12·4 months). Grade 3-4 haematological toxicities developed in 35 of 46 patients, whereas non-haematological adverse events occurred in seven patients.

CONCLUSION

Adding intraperitoneal paclitaxel had clinical efficacy with acceptable tolerability.

Phase I study of third-line palliative chemotherapy with low dose paclitaxel for pancreatic cancer

The prognosis of patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancers is very poor. Prior to development of nab-paclitaxel (PTX) plus gemcitabine (GEM) therapy and FOLFIRINOX therapy, there was no recommended third-line chemotherapy after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and GEM-based regimens. The present study conducted a Phase I clinical trial of weekly low-dose PTX as a third-line palliative chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer. PTX was administered on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle, repeated twice as follows: Level 1, 40 mg/m² (n=6); Level 2, 50 mg/m² (n=4). During the two cycles, three patients developed Grade 3 neutropenia in level 2; thus, the recommended dose was defined as 40 mg/m². The disease control rate was 40.0% (stable disease, n=4). Median time to treatment failure of the four patients with stable disease was 5.5 months. In conclusion, palliative chemotherapy with low-dose PTX after failure of GEM and 5-FU is well tolerated and safe for unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer patients. The unique ID issues by UMIN: 000008148.

Multicenter Phase II Study of Intravenous and Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel With S-1 for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of intravenous (i.v.) and intraperitoneal (i.p.) paclitaxel combined with S-1, "an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative containing tegafur, gimestat, and otastat potassium" in chemotherapy-naive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with peritoneal metastasis.

BACKGROUND

PDAC patients with peritoneal metastasis (peritoneal deposits and/or positive peritoneal cytology) have an extremely poor prognosis. An effective treatment strategy remains elusive.

METHODS

Paclitaxel was administered i.v. at 50 mg/m and i.p. at 20 mg/m on days 1 and 8. S-1 was administered at 80 mg/m/d for 14 consecutive days, followed by 7 days of rest. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS) rate. The secondary endpoints were antitumor effect and safety (UMIN000009446).

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients who were pathologically diagnosed with the presence of peritoneal dissemination (n = 22) and/or positive peritoneal cytology (n = 11) without other organ metastasis were enrolled. The tumor was located at the pancreatic head in 7 patients and the body/tail in 26 patients. The median survival time was 16.3 (11.47-22.57) months, and the 1-year survival rate was 62%. The response rate and disease control rate in assessable patients were 36% and 82%, respectively. OS in 8 patients who underwent conversion surgery was significantly higher than that of nonsurgical patients (n = 25, P = 0.0062). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities occurred in 42% of the patients and nonhematologic adverse events in 18%. One patient died of thrombosis in the superior mesenteric artery.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen has shown promising clinical efficacy with acceptable tolerability in chemotherapy-naive PDAC patients with peritoneal metastasis.

Bcl-2/Bcl-xL inhibitor ABT-737 sensitizes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to paclitaxel-induced cell death

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is an aggressive malignant disease that is resistant to various chemotherapeutic agents and commonly relapses. Efficient elimination of metastasized PDA is critical for a positive post-surgical treatment outcome. The present study analyzed the effect of the B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2)/B-cell lymphoma extra-large (Bcl-x_L) inhibitor, ABT-737, on paclitaxel-induced PDA cell death. A total of 8 PDA cell lines were subjected to immunoblotting to compare the expression of Bcl-2/Bcl-x_L and other factors associated with taxane resistance, including myeloid cell leukemia 1 and βIII-tubulin (TUBB3). The viability of PDA cells was analyzed following treatment with paclitaxel alone or a combination treatment with ABT-737 and paclitaxel. Treatment with the ABT-737/paclitaxel combination induced PDA cell death at a lower concentration of paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel alone. In addition, the viable cell population at the saturation point of paclitaxel was also decreased by co-treatment with ABT-737. ABT-737 lowered the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) by >2-fold in PDA cells with high Bcl-2/Bcl-x_L expression, but not in PDA cells with low Bcl-2/Bcl-x_L expression and high TUBB3 expression. Knockdown of Bcl-x_L lowered the IC₅₀ of paclitaxel, but knockdown of TUBB3 did not. ABT-737 sensitized PDA to paclitaxel-induced cell death, and Bcl-x_L expression was a key determinant of its sensitivity. ABT-737 is potential candidate for combination chemotherapy of PDA with high Bcl-x_L expression levels.

Phase I study of weekly palliative chemotherapy with low-dose third-line paclitaxel for biliary tract cancer

The prognosis of patients with unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC) is very poor. Although gemcitabine (GEM) plus cisplatin therapy is useful for unresectable cases, the median overall survival (OS) of the patients is <1 year, and third-line chemotherapy following failure of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and GEM plus cisplatin is currently unavailable. The clinical efficacy and basic effects of low-dose paclitaxel (PTX) therapy for patients with BTC was previously reported. We herein present the results of a phase I clinical trial of weekly low-dose PTX as third-line palliative chemotherapy. PTX was administered on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each cycle and repeated twice as follows: Level 1, 40 mg/m²; level 2, 50 mg/m² (n=3). During the two cycles, grade 1 or 2 adverse events were observed in 3 patients, whereas dose-limiting adverse events (grade 3 or 4) were not observed. The disease control rate was 83.3% (partial response, n=3; stable disease, n=2). The OS and median survival were 15.4 and 9.0 months, respectively. In conclusion, palliative chemotherapy with low-dose PTX following failure of GEM and 5-FU was well-tolerated, safe and effective for patients with unresectable or recurrent BTCs, and the optimal dose was 50 mg/m².

Intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel with S-1 for treatment of refractory pancreatic cancer with malignant ascites

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel (PTX) combined with S-1 for treatment of gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer with malignant ascites. Methods After the feasibility of this regimen was first confirmed in an interim analysis in 10 patients, a total of 35 patients were enrolled between April 2011 and December 2014. PTX was administered intravenously (50 mg/m(2)) and intraperitoneally (20 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8, and 80 mg/m(2) S-1 was administered on days 1-14 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), the objective tumor response, efficacy against malignant ascites, and safety. Result In all 35 patients, the median OS and PFS were 4.8 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.1-5.3) months and 2.8 (95 % CI, 0.9-4.1) months, respectively. The 26 patients who were evaluable for efficacy achieved a response rate of 8 % and a disease control rate of 69 %. Malignant ascites had disappeared or decreased in 18 (69 %) patients, including complete resolution in 4 (15 %), and a negative change in cytological status was achieved in 8 (31 %) patients. The major grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (34 %), anemia (31 %), nausea (9 %), and catheter-related infections (6 %). Conclusion Combination chemotherapy consisting of intravenous and intraperitoneal PTX with S-1 showed acceptable toxicity and favorable efficacy in pancreatic cancer patients with malignant ascites. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000005306).

Intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel with S-1 for refractory pancreatic cancer with malignant ascites: an interim analysis

OBJECTIVES

Here, we reported an interim analysis of feasibility and safety in the first 10 cases of 30 cases in a phase II trial of intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with S-1 for gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer with malignant ascites.

METHODS

Paclitaxel was administered intravenously at 50 mg/m2 and intraperitoneally at 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, and S-1 was administered at 80 mg/m2/day for 14 consecutive days, followed by 7-day rest.

RESULTS

Between April 2011 and February 2012, ten patients were enrolled. A partial response was achieved in two patients (20%) and a disease control rate of 50%. The median time to progression and overall survival were 2.1 and 3.4 months, respectively. Malignant ascites was completely resolved in two patients (20%). Major grade 3/4 adverse events were myelosuppression including neutropenia (50%) and catheter-related infection (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

This novel combination chemotherapy was feasible and showed promising results in pancreatic cancer patients with malignant ascites (clinical trial registration number: UMIN000005306).

Successful treatment of unresectable gallbladder cancer with low-dose paclitaxel as palliative chemotherapy after failure of gemcitabine and oral S-1: A case report

A 56-year-old female with metastatic gallbladder cancer involving the liver and stenosis of the hilar bile duct was treated with gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) plus S-1 (60 mg/m(2)). After 9 cycles of therapy, CT showed evidence of stable disease; however, the serum CEA level was increased. Therefore, the chemotherapy regimen was changed to weekly low-dose paclitaxel (60 mg/m(2)). After 12 cycles of therapy, paclitaxel was reduced to 30 mg/m(2) as the patient developed neutropenia. The patient completed 32 cycles of therapy, and the tumor was reduced in size and marked improvement in bile duct stenosis was noted without any impairment in quality of life. The patient succumbed to the disease 25 months after treatment was initiated. Thus, in this case paclitaxel was more effective than gemcitabine plus S-1. Palliative chemotherapy with paclitaxel after failure of gemcitabine and 5-FU was well-tolerated; therefore, it may be an effective treatment for biliary tract cancer (BTC). A phase I study of palliative chemotherapy with weekly low-dose paclitaxel following gemcitabine (plus cisplatin) and 5-FU is currently in progress in patients with unresectable or recurrent BTC.

MELD-sodium score and its prognostic value in malignancy-related ascites of pancreatic and gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Malignant ascites is a manifestation of end-stage events in a variety of cancers. There is significant lack of possible survival predictors in patients with malignancy-related ascites. Since the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-Na score has been shown to be a feasible and independent prognostic predictor for both short- and long-term outcome in HCC patients, we decided to test its prognostic role in other cancer types with ascites.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study. The outpatient oncology clinic's records were screened for the period between 2004 and 2011. Eighty-two pancreatic and gastric cancer patients were enrolled into the study.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 59 (±12). Fifty-nine patients had gastric cancer and 23 had pancreatic cancer. Overall survival (OS) was 16.8 (IR, 1-98) months in gastric cancer and 16.3 (IR, 0.5-81) months in pancreatic cancer. There was no statistically significant difference between OS of gastric and pancreatic cancer. Progression-free survival (PFS) was statistically significantly longer in gastric cancer than pancreatic cancer with 16.5 (IR, 0.5-90) vs 6.5 (IR, 0.4-34) months (P = 0.04). Further analysis of data included stepwise multiple regression analysis with the dependent variable "overall survival." The model had two independent predictors and an R(2) of 82 % and a predicted R(2) of 81 %. Predictors for time to remission were PFS and MELD-Na. The regression equation for the model was: Overall survival =17.4- 0.522 MELD-Na + 0.902 PFS CONCLUSION: In this study we showed that progression-free survival and MELD-Na score are significantly related with overall survival. MELD-Na score can be one of the predictors of the survival and PFS in pancreatic and gastric cancer patients with ascites.

Paclitaxel-based chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine-based therapy failure: a case series of 5 patients

Background/Objectives

Gemcitabine (GEM) is a gold-standard chemotherapy agent for advanced pancreatic cancer. Because of the malignant character of the disease, nearly all patients show disease progression despite treatment with GEM-based chemotherapy; therefore, second-line chemotherapy may be beneficial for these patients. We report a retrospective analysis of 5 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, treated with a paclitaxel-containing regimen as second-, third- or fourth-line chemotherapy after various therapies, such as a GEM-based regimen, S-1 regimen, and chemoradiation. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and adverse events, and evaluated the paclitaxel-containing regimens. A review of the literature is also discussed.

Results

The median overall survival from the start of salvage therapy was 10.7 months. The disease control rate of the paclitaxel-containing regimen according to RECIST criteria was 60%, including complete response in 0 patients, partial response in 3, and stable disease in 2. Two patients had malignant ascites at the start of this salvage therapy, and in both of them the ascites and clinical complaints improved. Grade 3 and 4 hematological adverse events were observed in 2 patients and 1 patient, respectively.

Conclusion

Salvage paclitaxel-based therapy could be beneficial to advanced pancreatic cancer patients who maintain good performance status after several chemotherapy failures.