Neoadjuvant oxaliplatin and capecitabine and bevacizumab without radiotherapy for poor-risk rectal cancer: N-SOG 03 Phase II trial

Treatment Pattern and Outcome of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in Resource-Constrained Countries: Experience at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

PURPOSE

Management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) includes neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed by total mesorectal excision. Recently, total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has gained attention. In developing countries, patients with rectal cancer often present at advanced stages. This study assesses treatment patterns and outcomes in LARC at a largest referral center in Ethiopia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 patients with LARC treated at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital from January 2020 to September 2022.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 45.5 years (range, 20-86), with 51% male. Of the patients, 81% had no previous oncologic treatment and 75.3% was discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board. Up-front surgery was planned for 44.4% of patients, whereas 22.2% and 8.6% were assigned to TNT and NACRT, respectively. Among 81 treatment-naïve patients, 79 were triaged for surgery, but only 47 (59.5%) underwent surgery, achieving an 89.9% R0 resection rate. Of 36 up-front planned surgeries, 35 proceeded as planned, whereas only 12 of 43 (28%) planned after neoadjuvant treatment underwent surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) was given to 37% of patients, with 16.7% (5 of 30) undergoing subsequent surgery. Radiotherapy was given to 24.2% of participants, with 56.25% undergoing surgery. Short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) was given to two patients. Only 14.8% completed all planned treatments, with radiation waiting time (median, 10 months) being the main impediment.

CONCLUSION

Timely administration of neoadjuvant treatment is not possible in most resource-limited settings. Because of better treatment completion, up-front surgery looks a more viable option than NACT in these situations. Extended waiting time for radiotherapy can be mitigated by opting for alternatives like SCRT in selected patients.

mFOLFOX6 versus mFOLFOX6 + aflibercept as neoadjuvant treatment in MRI-defined T3-rectal cancer: a randomized phase-II-trial of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group (CAO/ARO/AIO 0214)

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an option for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer at low risk for local recurrence. This randomized phase II trial investigated whether the addition of aflibercept to modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) could improve the rates of centrally confirmed pathological complete remissions (pCR) and (disease-free) survival in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-staged cT3 rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with rectal cancer fulfilling the following criteria were included: lower border of tumor >5 cm and <16 cm from anal verge; circumferential resection margin >2 mm and T3-tumor with a maximum infiltration of 10 mm, as determined by MRI. Patients were randomized 1 : 2 to six cycles mFOLFOX6 ± aflibercept. Surgery was scheduled 4 weeks after chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was the rate of centrally confirmed pCR. The study was designed to detect an improvement of pCR from 10% to 27% (power 80%, type I error 20%).

RESULTS

A total of 119 randomized patients started treatment (39 patients mFOLFOX6, arm A, and 80 mFOLFOX + aflibercept, arm B). The incidence of all grade adverse events was similar in both arms, however, adverse events grade ≥3 were more than twice as high in the experimental arm due to hypertension. Surgical complications were comparable. Aflibercept did not improve the pCR rate (arm A 26% versus arm B 19%, P = 0.47) and more patients in arm B had node positivity. With a median follow-up of 40.1 months, the 4-year disease-free survival was 83% in arm A and 85% in arm B (P = 0.82). Only two patients in arm A and one patient in arm B developed local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and MRI-defined low risk of local recurrence, neoadjuvant mFOLFOX6 + aflibercept was feasible and did not compromise surgery. Survival data were favorable in both arms, but pCR rates were not increased by the addition of aflibercept.

Curative Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Sigmoid Colon Cancer With Extensive Abdominal Wall Invasion: A Case Report

Locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) can be cured under an appropriate treatment strategy, but the decision on the treatment strategy is also important in terms of long-term prognosis. In cases with extensive abdominal wall involvement, it is especially important to secure adequate margins and repair abdominal wall defects. Recently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for LACC has shown promise in improving the chance of cure with tumor shrinkage. Herein, we report a case of curative surgery after NAC for locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer with extensive abdominal wall invasion. A 50-year-old woman visited our hospital with anemia and an abdominal mass. The diagnosis was LACC of the sigmoid colon with abdominal wall invasion (maximum size, 12 cm), and the clinical stage was stage IIIc (T4b[skin]N1bM0). Resection of the involved skin was expected to cause an extensive abdominal wall defect. At first, a colostomy was performed, followed by NAC with leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). Ten cycles of chemotherapy were completed without severe adverse events, and the tumor shrank in size by approximately 39%. We performed a curative sigmoidectomy combined with abdominal wall resection with adequate margins. We reconstructed the abdominal wall defect using a left anterolateral thigh skin flap. Pathological examination revealed mucinous carcinoma involving the transverse colon and abdominal wall, with luminal narrowing in the sigmoid colon. The surgical margins were negative, and the tumor was considered to have had a pathological partial response to NAC. Herein, we report a rare case of curative surgery after NAC with FOLFOX for LACC in the sigmoid colon with extensive invasion of the abdominal wall. We reconstructed the extensive abdominal wall defect with a free anterolateral thigh flap. One of the optional treatment strategies for LACC with extensive abdominal wall invasion was reported in our report.

A prospective single-center, single-arm, open-label, phase II study of sintilimab and anlotinib combined with chemotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment of resectable esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Antiangiogenic treatment and immunochemotherapy effectively treat patients with advanced esophageal cancer. However, there remains a dearth of studies concerning neoadjuvant therapy for resectable esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The study focused on patients with T2-4NxM0 resectable esophageal carcinoma. Neoadjuvant treatment involved administering anlotinib (10 mg orally, once a day, 2 weeks on and 1 week off) for antiangiogenesis and sintilimab (200 mg) and chemotherapy for three cycles. Surgical treatment was performed 4-6 weeks after the last chemotherapy cycle was completed. The primary endpoints assessed were pathological complete response (pCR) and safety.

RESULTS

Out of the 34 screened patients, 17 were successfully enrolled in the study, and 14 completed the entire treatment process. The pCR was 35.3% (6/17). However, two patients experienced mortality. The occurring rate of grade 3 or higher complications after the surgery was 78.6% (11/14) according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Specifically, anastomotic leakage was observed in 57.1% (8/14) of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the current regimen demonstrated improved pCR. However, it did not show significant improvement compared to immunochemotherapy. It is essential to exercise caution when using this treatment approach in patients with esophageal cancer as it might increase postoperative complications, especially anastomotic leakage.

A pilot study on the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemo‑adoptive immunotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

The safety and efficacy of combination therapy of immune cell therapy and chemotherapy [chemo-adoptive immunotherapy (CAIT)] for patients with stage IV or recurrent colorectal cancer have been reported. In the present study, the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant CAIT were investigated for preoperative therapy of locally advanced rectal cancer. The study included patients with cT3/T4 or cN (+) rectal adenocarcinoma scheduled for curative surgery. Six patients who consented to participate in the current study were selected as subjects. Neoadjuvant CAIT involves administration of activated autologous lymphocytes, αβ T cells, and mFOLFOX6 every 2 weeks for six courses, followed by surgery 4-6 weeks thereafter. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 neutropenia was observed in one patient. Neoadjuvant CAIT and curative surgery were performed on all the patients. The confirmed response rate was 67%. Downstaging was confirmed in five patients (83%). Regarding histological effects, two patients were grade 1a and four were grade 2. Regarding immunological reactions, both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration rates increased after treatment in three patients on tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) analysis. In peripheral blood analysis, the total lymphocyte count was maintained in all patients, and the CD8+ T cell count increased by ≥3 times on the pretreatment count in two patients but may not be associated with changes in TILs. During the median postoperative follow-up duration of 24 months, liver and lung metastases occurred in one patient, but all patients survived. In conclusion, neoadjuvant CAIT (αβ T cells + mFOLFOX6) can be safely administered for the treatment of advanced rectal cancer. Verification of the efficacy of comprehensive immune cell therapy, especially the induction of antitumor immunity for the prevention of recurrence, will be maintained. The current study is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; ID, jRCTc030190248; January 21, 2019).

Neoadjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab therapy for high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer: A prospective multicenter phase II study

Aim

We report the short/mid-term results of surgery for high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC, four courses of S-1 + oxaliplatin+ bevacizumab) without radiotherapy with the primary aim of ypT0-2.

Methods

High-risk LARC was defined as cT4b, mesorectal fascia (MRF) ≤1 mm (MRF+), or lateral lymph node metastasis (cLLN+) on high-resolution MRI. The planned 32 cases from April 2018 to December 2021 were all included.

Results

There were 10 patients at cT4b (31.2%), 26 MRF+ (81.3%), and 22 cLLN+ (68.8%). Thirteen (40.6%) underwent NAC after a colostomy for stenosis. NAC was completed in 26 (81.2%) cases. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in six (18.7%). One patient developed progressive disease (3.2%). Eleven were ycT0-3MRF-LLN- (34.3%). Curative-intent surgery was performed on 31, with sphincter-preserving surgery in 20, abdominoperineal resection in nine, total pelvic exenteration in two, and lateral lymph node dissection in 24. Two had R1/2 resection (6.4%). A Grade 3 or higher postoperative complication rate occurred in 3.2%. Pathological complete response and ypT0-2 rates were 12.9% and 45.1%. Three-year disease-free survival rates (3yDFS) for ypT0-2 and ypT ≥3 were 81.2%, 46.6% (p = 0.061), and 3-year local recurrence rates (3yLR) were 0%, 48.8% (p = 0.015). 3yDFS for ycT0-3MRF-LLN- and ycT4/MRF+/LLN+ were 87.5%, 48.0% (p = 0.031) and 3yLR were 0%, 42.8% (p = 0.045).

Conclusion

NAC yielded a clinically significant effect in about half of high-risk LARC patients. If NAC alone is ineffective, radiotherapy should be added, even if extended surgery is intended.

Pathologic complete response to TNT + camrelizumab for rectal cancer with surgical anus-preservation: case report and literature review

Background

This case report demonstrates the efficacy of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) based on pathological complete response (PCR). We also discuss the surgical approach to preserving the anus and its perioperative management.

Case presentaion

The patient was a 26-year-old woman, with blood in the stool and stool thinning for over two months. Preoperative examination revealed locally advanced rectal cancer invading the left anal raphe and enlarged lymph nodes adjacent to the left internal iliac vessels. The lesion was preoperatively classified as T4bN1bM0 IIIC. Considering the size and depth of the tumor, it was difficult to have sufficient margins for radical resection, and the tumor was too close to the anal orifice. Considering the patient's youth and strong desire to preserve the anus, it was decided to use TNT combined with a camrelizumab regimen. After the entire course of neoadjuvant radiotherapy, the tumor size significantly reduced in fibrotic manifestations, and no enlargement of the lymph nodes adjacent to the left internal iliac vessels was observed. She underwent robotic laparoscopic ultra-low anterior rectal resection, left lateral lymph node dissection, and temporary ileostomy, and no significant residue was observed after all bowel tubes were taken for examination, nor was there cancerous involvement at the distal or radial cut edges, or metastasis. The patient was discharged nine days postoperatively, and no major complications were detected. Follow-up was performed without adjuvant chemotherapy.

Conclusions

TNT may be a better surgical option for preserving the anus and for complete radical resection in patients with LARC for whom Miles' resection is indicated.

Comparison of the pathological response to 2 or 4 cycles of neoadjuvant CAPOX in II/III rectal cancer patients with low/intermediate risks: study protocol for a prospective, non-inferior, randomized control trial (COPEC trial)

BACKGROUND

For patients with low- and intermediate-risk stage II/III rectal cancer, current studies have reached a consensus that preoperative radiotherapy may be dispensed with, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) alone might achieve an accepted local control. Our previous phase II study has evidenced that the morphological response of NCT could be better judged at a relatively early stage. Low- and intermediate-risk stage II/III rectal cancer patients could achieve a high rate of tumor shrinkage and downgrade after only 4 cycles of NCT and obvious tumor morphological changes could be observed after 2 cycles of NCT. However, there is still a lack of more detailed stratification and evidence for pathological criteria. The aim of the present study (comparison of the pathological response to 2 or 4 cycles of neoadjuvant CAPOX in II/III rectal cancer patients with low/intermediate risks, COPEC trial) is to determine the pathological tumor regression grade (pTRG) rate of 2 or 4 cycles of NCT in low- and intermediate-risk stage II/III rectal cancer and verify the feasibility of early identification of chemotherapy-insensitive population.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is a multicenter, prospective, non-inferior, randomized controlled trial (RCT) initiated by West China Hospital of Sichuan University and designed to be conducted in fourteen hospitals around China. Eligible patients will be centrally randomized into 2 or 4 cycles of CAPOX in a 1:1 ratio using the central automated randomization system offered by the O-trial online system ( https://plus.o-trial.com/ ) and accept total mesorectal excision after 2 or 4 cycles of CAPOX (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m², once daily on day 1, every 21 days and capecitabine 1000 mg/m², twice daily on days 1 to 14, every 21 days). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with pathological no-tumor regression (pTRG 3), which is determined postoperatively by each sub-center and verified by the primary center.

DISCUSSION

COPEC trial is designed to verify that the preoperative CAPOX chemotherapy for low- and intermediate-risk stage II/III rectal cancer could achieve a good response judgment after 2 cycles and obtain the tumor pathological response rate after 2 cycles of CAPOX. We hope the COPEC trial could help in establishing a consensus standard of low- and intermediate-risk rectal cancer and the early identification of stage II/III rectal patients with low- and intermediate-risk who are poorly responding to NCT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrial.gov NCT04922853. Registered on June 4, 2021.

Identification of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone: Results of a retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) appears in a few clinical studies as an alternative to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) in selected patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of nCT with or without nCRT in patients with LARC and to identify patients who may be suitable for nCT alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 155 patients with LARC who received neoadjuvant treatment (NT) were retrospectively analysed from January 2016 to June 2021. The patients were divided into two groups: nCRT (n = 101) and nCT (n = 54). More patients with locally advanced disease (cT4, cN+ and magnetic resonance imaging-detected mesorectal fascia [mrMRF] positive [+]) were found in the nCRT group. Patients in the nCRT group received a dose of 50 Gy/25 Fx irradiation with concurrent capecitabine, and the median number of nCT cycles was two. In the nCT group, the median number of cycles was four.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 30 months. The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the nCRT group was significantly higher than that in the nCT group (17.5% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.047). A significant difference was observed in the locoregional recurrence rate (LRR); 6.9% in the nCRT group and 16.7% in the nCT group (p = 0.011). Among patients with initial mrMRF (+) status, the LRR in the nCRT group was significantly lower than that in the nCT group (6.1% vs. 20%, p = 0.007), but not in patients with initial mrMRF negative (-) (10.5% in each group, p = 0.647). Compared with the nCT group, a lower LRR was observed in patients in the nCRT group with initial mrMRF (+) converted to mrMRF (-) after NT (5.3% vs. 23%, p = 0.009). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding acute toxicity and overall and progression-free survivals. Multivariate analysis showed that nCRT and ypN stage were independent prognostic factors for the development of LRR.

CONCLUSION

Patients with initial mrMRF (-) may be suitable for nCT alone. However, patients with initial mrMRF (+) converted to mrMRF (-) after nCT are still at high risk of LRR, and radiotherapy is recommended. Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Essential updates 2020/2021: Advancing precision medicine for comprehensive rectal cancer treatment

In the paradigm shift related to rectal cancer treatment, we have to understand a variety of new emerging topics to provide appropriate treatment for individual patients as precision medicine. However, information on surgery, genomic medicine, and pharmacotherapy is highly specialized and subdivided, creating a barrier to achieving thorough knowledge. In this review, we summarize the perspective for rectal cancer treatment and management from the current standard-of-care to the latest findings to help optimize treatment strategy.

A phase II study of neoadjuvant capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (XELOXIRI) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Purpose

Addition of perioperative multi-agent chemotherapy to the treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) may be a promising option. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin and irinotecan (XELOXIRI) as triplet neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with LARC.

Methods

Patients received neoadjuvant irinotecan and oxaliplatin and capecitabine and then underwent total mesorectal excision. The primary study endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate.

Results

Between June 2013 and December 2016, 55 patients were enrolled in the study. Forty-two (77.8%) of 54 completed the study protocol. The pCR rate was 7.7% (95% CI 3.0% to 18.2%). The 3-year local recurrence rate was 3.9%, the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 77.3, and the 3-year overall survival rate was 96.0%.

Conclusion

XELOXIRI neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to be feasible and efficacious for patients with LARC. Although neoadjuvant XELOXIRI alone did not yield our expected pCR rate, the local recurrence rate, 3-year DFS, and measures of safety met current standards.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant CapeOX/mFOLFOX6 without radiation for patients with baseline resectable mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

Chemotherapy without radiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has attracted increasing attention, but the optimal schema remains controversial. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) of two regimens for patients with mid-low baseline resectable LARC.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in 131 patients with baseline resectable LARC in a single center between April 2016 and August 2020. All patients received four cycles of neoadjuvant CapeOX or mFOLFOX6 before surgery. Clinical characteristics, pathological response, and survival status were then assessed.

RESULTS

After a 1:1 propensity score matching, 96 patients were enrolled, including 48 receiving CapeOX and 48 receiving mFOLFOX6. The objective regression rates were 50.00% and 58.33%, and the pathological complete response rates were 6.25% and 8.33%, respectively, in the CapeOX and mFOLFOX6 groups. Patients who received mFOLFOX6 had a better tumor regression grade (TRG) than those who received CapeOX (P = 0.005). Patients in both groups had similar survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The nCT has shown promising tumor response and survival outcomes, which can be a treatment option for baseline resectable LARC. For the two regimens, mFOLFOX6 provided better TRG than CapeOX, although no differences were observed in disease-free survival and OS.

Bevacizumab increases the risk of anastomosis site leakage in metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor and is used in combination with first-line chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. One of the side effects of bevacizumab is gastrointestinal perforation. This study was designed to identify the effect of bevacizumab in intestinal anastomosis site healing.

Methods

From January 2010 to December 2020, patients diagnosed with stage IV colorectal cancer treated with palliative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical signs or symptoms and computed tomography were tools used for diagnosing anastomosis site leakage. The patients were divided into two groups, the bevacizumab group (n = 136) and the non-bevacizumab group (n = 124).

Results

Among the 260 patients 14 (5.4%) patients were diagnosed with anastomosis site leakage. In the bevacizumab group, 13 (9.6%) patients were diagnosed with anastomotic leakage. In the non-bevacizumab group, 1 (0.8%) patient was diagnosed with anastomotic leakage. Anastomosis site leakage was significantly higher in the bevacizumab treatment group (P < 0.001). In the bevacizumab group, period of drug discontinuation before surgery was factor associated with anastomosis site leakage in multivariable analysis (P = 0.031).

Conclusion

Stage IV colorectal patients treated with bevacizumab before radical surgery for primary cancer should be carefully observed of anastomosis site leakage after surgery, and the period of drug discontinuation before surgery should be longer than 5 weeks to avoid anastomosis site leakage.

LncRNA-miRNA axis in tumor progression and therapy response: An emphasis on molecular interactions and therapeutic interventions

Epigenetic factors are critical regulators of biological and pathological mechanisms and they could interact with different molecular pathways. Targeting epigenetic factors has been an idea approach in disease therapy, especially cancer. Accumulating evidence has highlighted function of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) as epigenetic factors in cancer initiation and development and has focused on their association with downstream targets. microRNAs (miRNAs) are the most well-known targets of lncRNAs and present review focuses on lncRNA-miRNA axis in malignancy and therapy resistance of tumors. LncRNA-miRNA regulates cell death mechanisms such as apoptosis and autophagy in cancers. This axis affects tumor metastasis via regulating EMT and MMPs. Besides, lncRNA-miRNA axis determines sensitivity of tumor cells to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Based on the studies, lncRNAs can be affected by drugs and genetic tools in cancer therapy and this may affect expression level of miRNAs as their downstream targets, leading to cancer suppression/progression. LncRNAs have both tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressor functions in cancer and this unique function of lncRNAs has complicated their implication in tumor therapy. LncRNA-miRNA axis can also affect other signaling networks in cancer such as PI3K/Akt, STAT3, Wnt/β-catenin and EZH2 among others. Notably, lncRNA/miRNA axis can be considered as a signature for diagnosis and prognosis in cancers.

Biologics in rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Despite the use of multimodality therapy, locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) still presents high rates of disease recurrence. Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy concurrently with radiation therapy (RT) remains the cornerstone of neoadjuvant therapy of LARC, and novel therapies are urgently needed in order to improve the clinical outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

We aim to summarize data from completed and ongoing clinical trials addressing the role of biological therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and gene therapies in the systemic therapy of rectal cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

Deeper understanding of the molecular biology of colorectal cancer (CRC) has allowed meaningful advances in the systemic therapy of metastatic disease in the past few years. The larger applicability of biological therapy in CRC, including genome-guided targeted therapy, antiangiogenics, and immunotherapy, gives us optimism for the personalized management of rectal cancer. Microsatellite instability (MSI) tumors have demonstrated high sensitivity to ICIs, and preliminary findings in the neoadjuvant setting of rectal cancer are promising. To date, antiangiogenic and anti-EGFR therapies in LARC have not demonstrated the same benefit seen in metastatic disease. The outstanding results accomplished by biomarker-guided therapy in metastatic CRC will guide future developments of biological therapy in LARC.

Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for lower rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

There have been reports about robotic surgery for rectal cancer with chemoradiotherapy (CRT), but only a few studies have compared the use of robotic surgery with and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The aim of our study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic surgery with and without NAC for lower rectal cancer and to examine the effects of NAC on robotic surgery.

METHODS

From January 2016 to July 2021, we compared the short-term outcomes of 45 patients who did not undergo NAC and 55 patients who underwent NAC.

RESULTS

The rate of sphincter-preserving surgeries was higher in the NAC group than in the non-NAC group (P = .024). The total operative time was significantly longer in the NAC group than in the non-NAC group (P < .001). The rate of lateral lymph node dissection was significantly higher in the NAC group than in the non-NAC group (P < .001). No significant differences were identified in the rate of incisional surgical site infections (SSI), organ/space SSI postoperative bleeding, small bowel obstruction, anastomotic leakage, urinary dysfunction, or urinary infections between the groups. There were eight incidences of lateral lymph node metastasis (15%) and two cases with positive resection margins (4.0%) in the NAC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic surgery after NAC has few complications and a higher sphincter-preserving rate that without NAC.

Short-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabineplus oxaliplatin for patients with locally advanced rectal cancerfollowed by total or tumor-specific mesorectal excision with orwithout lateral pelvic lymph node dissection

Background: The standard strategy in Japan for locally advanced rectal cancer is total mesorectal excision plus adjuvant chemotherapy. However, large tumors significantly restrict pelvic manipulation of the distal side of the tumor during surgery; therefore, from an oncological point of view, it is better to shrink the tumor as much as possible preoperatively to optimize the circumferential resection margin. In recent years, advances in systemic chemotherapy have significantly improved the tumor reduction effect, enabling such drug therapy prior to surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer. We herein retrospectively evaluated the clinical, short-term outcomes of patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) using capecitabin and oxaliplatin (CAPOX), focusing on overall safety as well as clinical and pathological staging responses to NAC.

Methods: We applied the preoperative chemotherapy protocol to T3-4, any N, M0 or M1a (with resectable metastases) (UICC 8^th) Ra/Rb rectal cancers. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of four cycles of CAPOX. After NAC, curative intent surgery with total mesorectal excision/tumor-specific mesorectal excision with/without metastasectomy was performed. Adverse effects (AEs) and compliance with NAC, surgical complications, clinical and pathological staging were evaluated. All patients undergoing the protocol between January 2017 and June 2021 at Fukushima Medical University were enrolled.

Results: Twenty cases were enrolled. No severe AEs were observed either preoperatively or perioperatively. Preoperative assessment of NAC showed no cases of progressive disease (PD). Radical resection was achieved in all cases. Histological therapeutic grading after NAC revealed one grade 3, four grade 2, three grade 1b, eleven grade 1a and one grade 0 among all cases.

Conclusion: This study suggests that NAC for locally advanced rectal cancer is likely to be acceptable because there were no severe AEs pre- or perioperatively, radical resection was achieved in all cases, and there were no cases of PD.

Oncological Treatment-Related Fatigue in Oncogeriatrics: A Scoping Review

Fatigue is a highly prevalent symptom in both cancer patients and the older population, and it contributes to quality-of-life impairment. Cancer treatment-related fatigue should thus be included in the risk/benefit assessment when introducing any treatment, but tools are lacking to a priori estimate such risk. This scoping review was designed to report the current evidence regarding the frequency of fatigue for the different treatment regimens proposed for the main cancer indications, with a specific focus on age-specific data, for the following tumors: breast, ovary, prostate, urothelium, colon, lung and lymphoma. Fatigue was most frequently reported using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) versions 3 to 5. A total of 324 regimens were analyzed; data on fatigue were available for 217 (67%) of them, and data specific to older patients were available for 35 (11%) of them; recent pivotal trials have generally reported more fatigue grades than older studies, illustrating increasing concern over time. This scoping review presents an easy-to-understand summary that is expected to provide helpful information for shared decisions with patients regarding the anticipation and prevention of fatigue during each cancer treatment.

A Prospective Multicenter Phase II Study on the Feasibility and Efficacy of S-1 and Oxaliplatin Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision compose the standard of care for rectal cancer in multiple guidelines. However, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has not exhibited clear survival benefits but rather has led to an increase in adverse events. Conversely, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is expected to prevent adverse events caused by radiation, yet this treatment is still controversial.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of S-1 and oxaliplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy together with total mesorectal excision for resectable locally advanced rectal cancer.

DESIGN

The study was a prospective, single-arm phase II trial.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at multiple institutions.

PATIENTS

Fifty-eight patients with resectable locally advanced rectal cancer were enrolled.

INTERVENTION

Three cycles of S-1 and oxaliplatin were administered before surgery. S-1 was administered orally at 80 mg/m2 per day for 14 consecutive days, followed by a 7-day resting period. Oxaliplatin was given intravenously on the first day at a dose of 130 mg/m2 per day. The duration of 1 cycle was considered to be 21 days. Total mesorectal excision with bilateral lymph node dissection was carried out after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The study was designed to detect the feasibility and efficacy of S-1 and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The completion rate of 3 courses of S-1 and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 94.8% (55/58). The reasons for discontinuation were thrombocytopenia (3.4%) and liver injury (1.7%). The most common severe (grade ≥3) adverse effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was thrombocytopenia (3.4%). There were no severe adverse clinical symptoms. Consequently, R0 resection was achieved in 51 (98.1%) of 52 patients. Pathologic complete response occurred in 10 patients (19.2%).

LIMITATIONS

This was a single-arm, nonrandomized phase II study.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of S-1 and oxaliplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy and total mesorectal excision is a feasible and promising treatment option for resectable locally advanced rectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B555.

UN ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO MULTICNTRICO FASE II SOBRE LA FACTIBILIDAD Y EFICACIA DE LA QUIMIOTERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE SCON OXALIPLATINO PARA EL CNCER DE RECTO LOCALMENTE AVANZADO

ANTECEDENTES:La quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante y la escisión mesorrectal total constituyen el estándar de atención para el cáncer de recto en varias guías. Sin embargo, la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante no ha mostrado beneficios claros en la sobrevida, pero si ha creado un aumento de eventos adversos. Por otro lado, se espera que la quimioterapia neoadyuvante prevenga los eventos adversos asociados a la radiación, aunque este tratamiento sigue siendo controvertido.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la factibilidad y eficacia de la quimioterapia neoadyuvante S-1 con oxaliplatino en conjunto con la escisión mesorrectal total para el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado resecable.DISEÑO:El estudio fue un ensayo prospectivo fase II de brazo único.AMBITO:Estudio realizado en múltiples instituciones.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron 58 pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado resecable.INTERVENCIÓN:Se administraron tres ciclos de S-1 con oxaliplatino antes de la cirugía. Se administró S-1 por vía oral a 80 mg / m2 / día durante 14 días consecutivos, seguido de un período de descanso de 7 días. El oxaliplatino se administró por vía intravenosa el primer día a una dosis de 130 mg / m2 / día. Se consideró la duración de un ciclo de 21 días. Posterior a la quimioterapia neoadyuvante se realizó la excisión total mesorrectal con disección ganglionar bilateral.PRINCIPALES VARIABLES EVALUDADAS:El estudio fue diseñado para conocer la factibilidad y eficacia de S-1 con oxaliplatino como quimioterapia neoadyuvante.RESULTADOS:La tasa de conclusión con tres ciclos de S-1 con oxaliplatino como quimioterapia neoadyuvante fue del 94,8% (55/58). Los motivos de interrupción fueron trombocitopenia (3,4%) y daño hepático (1,7%). El efecto adverso grave más común (grado ≥ 3) de la quimioterapia neoadyuvante fue la trombocitopenia (3,4%). No hubo síntomas clínicos adversos graves. Como resultado, la resección R0 se logró en 51 de 52 pacientes (98,1%). Una respuesta patológica completa se obtuvo en 10 pacientes (19,2%).LIMITACIONES:Fue un estudio de fase II no aleatorizado de un solo brazo.CONCLUSIONES:La combinación de S-1 con oxaliplatino como quimioterapia neoadyuvante y escisión mesorrectal total es factible y es una opción de tratamiento prometedora para el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado resecable. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B555. (Traducción-Dr Juan Antonio Villanueva-Herrero).

Robotic surgery contributes to the preservation of bowel and urinary function after total mesorectal excision: comparisons with transanal and conventional laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Determine whether robotic surgery is more effective than transanal and conventional laparoscopic surgery in preserving bowel and urinary function after total mesorectal excision (TME).

METHODS

Of 79 lower rectal cancer patients who underwent function-preserving TME between 2016 and 2020, 64 patients consented to a prospective questionnaire-based functional observation study (52 responded). At 6 months post-resection or ileostomy closure, Wexner, low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), modified fecal incontinence quality of life, and international prostate symptom scores were used to evaluate bowel and urinary function, comparing robotic surgery (RTME) with transanal (taTME) or conventional laparoscopic surgery (LTME).

RESULTS

RTME was performed in 35 patients (54.7%), taTME in 15 (23.4%), and LTME in 14 (21.9%). While preoperative bowel/urinary functions were similar in all three procedures, and the distance from the anal verge to tumor was almost the same, more hand-sewn anastomoses were performed and the anastomotic height from the anal verge was shorter in taTME than RTME. At 2 years post-resection, 8 patients (12.5%) had a permanent stoma; RTME showed a significantly lower rate of permanent stoma than taTME (2.9% vs. 40%, p < 0.01). Despite no significant difference, all bowel function assessments were better in RTME than in taTME or LTME. Major LARS was observed in all taTME and LTME cases, but only 78.8% of RTME. No clear difference arose between RTME and taTME in urinary function; urinary dysfunction was more severe in LTME than RTME (36.4% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In function-preserving TME for lower rectal cancer, robotic surgery was suggested to be more effective than transanal and conventional laparoscopic surgery in terms of bowel and urinary functions.

The Evolving Neoadjuvant Treatment Paradigm for Patients with Locoregional mismatch Repair Proficient Rectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

The standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has included preoperative chemoradiation, total mesorectal excision surgery and post operative adjuvant chemotherapy based on histopathology. The current therapeutic landscape in LARC has many different options with different directions of travel - depending on the goal of treatment. Enthusiasm for delivering total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is increasing in the light of recently published randomised phase III trials - RAPIDO and PRODIGE-23. There is a wide diversity of different potential schedules and a multitude of approaches, which include induction neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with a range of chemotherapy options (CAPEOX, FOLFOX, FOLFOXIRI) and a varying duration of 6-18 weeks, or consolidation NACT. These schedules either precede or follow short-course preoperative radiation therapy (SCPRT) using 5 × 5Gy or long-course chemoradiation (LCCRT) using 45-60Gy respectively. The different strategies of induction and consolidation neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been compared and have similar long-term outcomes, but consolidation chemotherapy may facilitate organ-sparing. The results are driving novel paradigms with both intensification and de-intensification treatment strategies. The ideal combination, sequence or duration of such a TNT approach remains undefined. As yet, there are no robust clinical, genetic, molecular, immune or imaging features (alone or integrated), which either direct or aid these choices. Currently, the selection of neoadjuvant treatment is driven by the impact on avoidance or feasibility of surgery or reducing the risk of metastases rather than prevention of local recurrence. Most believe that TNT will improve overall survival, despite the present lack of evidence. Both the inherent heterogeneity in LARC and the observed range of different responses underline the need for response biomarkers to individually tailor therapy rather than 'a one size fits all' approach.

Short-Term Outcomes with Standardized Transperineal Minimally Invasive Abdominoperineal Excision for Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Transperineal abdominoperineal excision (TpAPE) is an emerging approach for low rectal cancers but is technically challenging. Based on an anatomical study we conducted previously, we have standardized the TpAPE procedure. Here, we aimed to validate the feasibility of the standardized TpAPE by investigating the short-term outcomes.

METHODS

From January 2018 to November 2020, a total of 405 patients underwent laparoscopic or robotic rectal resection for rectal cancer in our institution. For the current study, we analyzed data for the 31 patients who underwent TpAPE. The abdominal phase was performed synchronously with the perineal phase using either a laparoscopic or robotic approach. Short-term outcomes included operative and pathological results.

RESULTS

Of the 31 cases, we identified anterior quadrant tumor invasion in 21. Most of the cases were advanced, with 6 staged as cT3 and 20 as T4. Of the 27 cases not involving distant metastasis, neoadjuvant therapy was performed in 19. No inadvertent rectal perforation or urethral injury was found intraoperatively. The median procedural duration to specimen removal was 250 min (interquartile range, 204-287), and the median intraoperative blood loss was 10 ml (interquartile range, 5-40). Regarding postoperative complications, perineal wound infection developed in 11 cases. A positive circumferential resection margin was found in 3, corresponding to the positive rate of 9.7%. These three cases were among the first 12 cases involving standardized TpAPE.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results indicate that TpAPE can be performed safely and might represent a useful option for low rectal cancer resection.

Feasibility and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy without Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study explored the feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) without radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

Patients with clinical stage of T3-T4 and/or N-positive LARC patients were included. We retrospectively analyzed patients' NAC-related and perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 30 patients. mFOLFOX6 or SOX plus cetuximab was administered to 12 patients with the wild-type RAS gene and FOLFOXIRI or SOXIRI to 18 patients with mutant-type RAS. The NAC completion rate was 90.0%. All patients underwent total mesorectal excision, and 29 patients underwent combined bilateral lateral lymph node dissection. The R0 operation rate was 90.0%. Although the postoperative complication rate was 40%, no complications were associated with NAC. The response rate of NAC and the proportion of histological anti-tumor effect grade ≥ 2 were 56.7% and 46.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

NAC was considered to be a safe, feasible treatment option for LARC.

Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: What We Learned in the Last Two Decades and the Future Perspectives

The advancement in surgical techniques, optimization of systemic chemoradiotherapy, and development of refined diagnostic and imaging modalities have brought a phenomenal shift in the treatment of the locally advanced rectal cancer. Although each therapeutic option has shown substantial progress in their field, it is finding their ideal amalgamation which has baffled the clinician and researchers alike. In the effort to identifying the perfect salutary treatment plan, we have even shifted our attention from the trimodal approach to non-operative "watchful waiting" to more recent individualized care. In this article, we acknowledge the scientific progress in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer and compare the opportunities as well as the obstacles while implementing them clinically. We also explore the current challenges and controversies surrounding the multidisciplinary approach and highlight the new trends and recent advances with an ultimate goal to improve the patients' quality of life.

Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX for locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer with diverticulitis: A case report

Introduction and importance

The standard treatment for locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) without distant metastasis is curative surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, but the long-term outcomes of this strategy are not satisfactory. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a promising novel option to overcome this issue. Tumor regression is an expected effect of NAC for LACC, but pathological complete response (pCR) is rare. In this report, we present a rare case of pCR after NAC with FOLFOX for LACC in the sigmoid colon.

Presentation of case

A 66-year-old woman presented to our hospital with fever and abdominal pain. The diagnosis was LACC in the sigmoid colon with possible invasion of the uterus and pelvic wall, stage IIIC (T4bN1bM0). Furthermore, the tumor was complicated by diverticulitis. A colostomy was performed, followed by NAC with FOLFOX. Six cycles were completed without significant adverse events, and the lesion shrunk remarkably. We performed a curative sigmoidectomy without any postoperative complications. Pathological examination revealed no viable cancer cells, indicating pCR.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of pCR after NAC for LACC complicated by diverticulitis. Colostomy before NAC, regimen, and cycle of NAC may be the key to this favorable course.

Conclusion

We present a rare case of pathological complete after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX for locally advanced colon cancer in the sigmoid colon complicated by diverticulitis. Our experience may be valuable in determining the optimal treatment strategy for LACC complicated by diverticulitis.

•

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a promising novel option for locally advanced colon cancer.

•

Pathological complete response is rare.

•

Indications for cases complicated with diverticulitis are unknown.

•

We present a rare case of pCR after NAC for LACC complicated by diverticulitis.

Current State of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer, with rectal cancer accounting for 30% of cases. The current standard of care curative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is (chemo)radiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Although neoadjuvant radiotherapy has reduced the risk of local recurrence to less than 10%, the risk of distant metastasis remained high at 30% affecting patient survival. In addition, there is a recognition that there is heterogeneity in tumor biology and treatment response with good responders potentially suitable for treatment de-escalation. Therefore, new treatment sequencing and regimens were investigated. Here, we reviewed the evidence for current neoadjuvant treatment options in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma, and highlight the new challenges in this new treatment landscape.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation as a potential alternative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (Neo-CRT) is the current standard strategy for treating locally advanced rectal cancer. However, it delays the administration of optimal chemotherapy and increases toxicity.

AIM

To compare the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Neo-CT) and Neo-CRT for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

The Cochrane, EMBASE, and PubMed databases were searched for relevant articles using MESH terms and free words. The hazard ratio of overall survival and the risk ratio (RR) for the pathological complete response, the sphincter preservation rate, and treatment-related adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies of 60870 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in overall survival [hazard ratio = 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.93–1.24; P = 0.19] or the pathological complete response (RR = 0.79, 95%CI = 0.61–1.03; P = 0.086) between the Neo-CT and Neo-CRT groups. As compared to the Neo-CRT group, the incidences of anastomotic fistula (RR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.35–0.68; P = 0.000) and temporary colostomy (RR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.58–0.83; P = 0.000) were significantly lower in the Neo-CT group, with a simultaneous increase in the sphincter preservation rate (RR = 1.07, 95%CI = 1.01–1.13; P = 0.029). However, there was no significant difference in the tumor downstaging rate, overall complications, and urinary complications.

CONCLUSION

Neo-CT administration can lower the incidences of anastomotic fistula and temporary colostomy and increase the sphincter preservation rate as to compared to Neo-CRT and could provide an alternative to chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

CD133 Expression Predicts Relapse in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

AIM

The aim of the present study was to explore the association between CD133 expression and postoperative relapses in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined 52 patients with LARC (cT3-4, Nany, M0) who received oxaliplatin-based NAC before surgery. CD133 expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry and divided into low and high expression groups.

RESULTS

High CD133 expression was observed in 22 patients (42.3%). Patients with high CD133 expression had more frequent vessel invasion and relapse than those with low CD133 expression (p=0.013 and p=0.036, respectively). Comparing the low with high CD133 expression groups, the 4-year relapse-free survival rates were 82.2% vs. 46.3% (p=0.009). Multivariate analysis indicated that CD133 expression was an independent risk factor for relapse (HR=3.138; 95%CI=1.046-9.412; p=0.041).

CONCLUSION

CD133 expression may be a predictive biomarker for postoperative relapse in patients with LARC who received NAC before surgery.

Retrospective Comparison of mFOLFOXIRI With XELOX/SOX as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation (NAC) shows favorable outcomes for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), however, the optimal regimen has not been determined yet. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, folinic acid, and 5-fluorouracil (mFOLFOXIRI) with capecitabine/S-1 and oxaliplatin (XELOX/SOX) in rectal cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined patients with LARC who received mFOLFOXIRI or XELOX/SOX as NAC.

RESULTS

Between January 2015 and July 2019, 49 patients received mFOLFOXIRI and 37 patients received XELOX/SOX. The pathological response rates (over two-thirds affected tumor area) were 36.7% and 40.5% in the mFOLFOXIRI and XELOX/SOX groups, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was experienced by 45.0% of the patients in the mFOLFOXIRI group and 8.0% in the XEOX/SOX group.

CONCLUSION

Although pathological responses were comparable between two groups, mFOLFOXIRI tended to be more toxic compared to XELOX/SOX as NAC for LARC.

Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

Background and purpose

With the advent of more intensive chemotherapy regimens, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has always been questioned due to its inevitable radiation toxicity. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and NACRT.

Materials and methods

Eligible studies were searched using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to 31 July 2020, comparing the clinical efficacy of NAC versus NACRT for LARC. Short- and long-term outcomes were determined using the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Six studies with 12,812 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis, including 677 patients in the NAC group and 12,135 patients in the NACRT group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of pathological complete response rate (OR=0.62, 95%CI=0.27~1.41), N down-staging rate (OR=1.20, 95%CI=0.25~5.79), R0 resection rate (OR=1.24, 95%CI=0.78~1.98), and local relapse rate (OR=1.12, 95%CI=0.58~2.14). The pooled OR for the total response rate and T down-staging were in favor of NACRT (OR=0.41, 95%CI=0.22~0.76 versus OR=0.67 95%CI=0.52~0.87). However, the pooled OR for the sphincter preservation rate favored NAC compared with NACRT (OR=1.87, 95%CI=1.24~2.81). Moreover, NAC was found to be superior to NACRT in terms of distant metastasis (14.3% vs. 20.4%), but the difference was not significant (OR=0.84, 95%CI=0.31~2.27).

Conclusion

We concluded that NAC was superior to NACRT in terms of the sphincter preservation rate, and non-inferior to NACRT in terms of pCR, N down-staging, R0 resection, local relapse, and distant metastasis. However, the conclusion warrants further validation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02251-0.

Evolution and Current Status of the Multidisciplinary Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

The management of locally advanced rectal cancer has grown in both complexity and quality since the first proctectomy. What once was a malignancy with a fairly consistent treatment algorithm for decades, a recent paradigm shift in the care of these patients has led to a more personalized, multidisciplinary approach with variations in timing, sequence, duration, and potential exclusion of multimodality therapies. This review summarizes the most important evidence behind these developing overarching concepts to provide a context for this paradigm shift.

Predictive factors for early distant metastasis after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Distant relapse is the leading cause of cancer-related death in locally advanced rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) followed by surgery inevitably delays delivery of systemic treatment. Some patients show early distant metastasis before systemic treatment.

AIM

To identify the most effective treatments. We investigated prognostic factors for distant metastasis, especially early distant metastasis, using the standard treatment paradigm to identify the most effective treatments according to recurrence risk.

METHODS

From January 2015 through December 2019, rectal cancer patients who underwent NACRT for having clinical T 3-4 or clinical N 1-2 disease according to the 8^th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system were included. Radiotherapy was delivered to the whole pelvis with concomitant chemotherapy. Patients received surgery 6-8 wk after completion of NACRT. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered at the physician’s discretion.

RESULTS

A total of 127 patients received NACRT. Ninety-three patients (73.2%) underwent surgery. The R0 resection rate was 89.2% in all patients. Pathologic tumor and node downstaging rates were 41.9% and 76.3%. Half the patients (n = 69) received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. The 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 81.7% and 83.5%. On univariate analyses, poorly differentiated tumors, > 5 cm, involvement of mesorectal fascia (MRF), or presence of extramural involvement (EMVI) were associated with worse DMFS and OS. Five patients showed distant metastasis at their first evaluation after NACRT. Patients with early distant metastasis were more likely to have poorly differentiated tumor (P = 0.025), tumors with involved MRF (P = 0.002), and EMVI (P = 0.012) than those who did not.

CONCLUSION

EMVI, the involvement of MRF, and poor histologic grade were associated with early distant metastasis. In order to control distant metastasis and improve treatment outcome, selective use of neoadjuvant treatment according to individualized risk factors is necessary. Future studies are required to determine effective treatment strategies for patients at high risk for distant metastasis.

MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion potentiates the risk for pathological metastasis to the lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Multidisciplinary treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer requires an accurate assessment of the risk of metastasis to the lateral lymph nodes (LNs). We herein aimed to stratify the risk of pathological metastasis to lateral LNs based on the preoperatively detected malignant features.

METHODS

All patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery from January 2016 to July 2020 were identified. We recorded the TNM factors; perirectal and lateral LN sizes; and MRI findings, including mesorectal fascia involvement, extramural vascular invasion (EMVI), tumor site, and tumor distance from the anal verge.

RESULTS

101 patients underwent rectal resection with lateral lymph node dissection, of whom 16 (15.8%) exhibited pathological metastases to the lateral LNs. Univariate analyses demonstrated that lateral LN metastasis was significantly correlated with mrEMVI positivity (p = 0.0023) and a baseline lateral LN short-axis length of ≥ 5 mm (p < 0.0001). These significant associations were confirmed by a multivariate analysis (p = 0.0254 and 0.0027, respectively). The lateral LN metastasis rate was as high as 44% in cases bearing both risk factors, compared to 0% in cases lacking both risk factors.

CONCLUSION

The results elucidated in this study may contribute to risk stratification, which can be used when determining the indications for lateral lymph node dissection.

Total neoadjuvant therapy vs standard therapy of locally advanced rectal cancer with high-risk factors for failure

BACKGROUND

For locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), standard therapy [consisting of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (ChT)] achieves excellent local control. Unfortunately, survival is still poor due to distant metastases, which remains the leading cause of death among these patients. In recent years, the concept of total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has been developed, whereby all systemic ChT-mainly affecting micrometastases-is applied prior to surgery.

AIM

To compare standard therapy and total neoadjuvant therapy for LARC patients with high-risk factors for failure.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, we compared LARC patients with high-risk factors for failure who were treated with standard therapy or with TNT. High-risk for failure was defined according to the presence of at least one of the following factors: T4 stage; N2 stage; positive mesorectal fascia; extramural vascular invasion; positive lateral lymph node. TNT consisted of 12 wk of induction ChT with capecitabine and oxaliplatin or folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, CRT with capecitabine, and 6-8 wk of consolidation ChT with capecitabine and oxaliplatin or folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR). In total, 72 patients treated with standard therapy and 89 patients treated with TNT were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Compared to standard therapy, TNT showed a higher proportion of pCR (23% vs 7%; P = 0.01), a lower neoadjuvant rectal score (median: 8.43 vs 14.98; P < 0.05), higher T-and N-downstaging (70% and 94% vs 51% and 86%), equivalent R0 resection (95% vs 93%), shorter time to stoma closure (mean: 20 vs 33 wk; P < 0.05), higher compliance during systemic ChT (completed all cycles 87% vs 76%; P < 0.05), lower proportion of acute toxicity grade ≥ 3 during ChT (3% vs 14%, P < 0.05), and equivalent acute toxicity and compliance during CRT and in the postoperative period. The pCR rate in patients treated with TNT was significantly higher in patients irradiated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy/volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy than with 3D conformal radiotherapy (32% vs 9%; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared to standard therapy, TNT provides better outcome for LARC patients with high-risk factors for failure, in terms of pCR and neoadjuvant rectal score.

Randomized phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of SOX versus mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (KSCC1301)

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the current standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), is associated with many radiotherapy (RT)-related side effects. We aimed to evaluate whether S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) or folinic acid, 5-FU, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) can be as effective as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimens for LARC without RT.

METHODS

Patients with untreated resectable LARC were randomly assigned to receive SOX or mFOLFOX6. The NAC protocol period was 3 months. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoints included pathological effects, surgical completion rate, 3-year survival, and safety.

RESULTS

From September 2013 to October 2015, 56 and 54 patients were enrolled in the SOX and mFOLFOX6 arms, respectively. The 3-year DFS rates were 69.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54.9-83.6) and 73.4% (95% CI 58.7-83.6) in the SOX and mFOLFOX6 arms, respectively; no significant differences were found between the arms (log-rank test; P = 0.5315, hazard ratio: 0.808, 95% CI 0.414-1.578). The 3-year survival rates were 92.3 and 91.8% in the SOX and mFOLFOX6 arms, respectively. The surgical completion rate was 98.1% overall, 100% in the SOX arm, and 96.0% in the mFOLFOX6 arm. The incidences of pathological response rates ≥grade 1b were 41.5 and 43.8% in the SOX and mFOLFOX6 arms, respectively. Both treatments were manageable and tolerable.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of SOX and mFOLFOX6, both of which may be new neoadjuvant treatment candidates in previously untreated LARC cases.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 3rd Oct 2013; This study was registered in the UMIN clinical trials registry on 14th Aug, 2013. (Prospectively registered, UMIN-CTR number UMIN000011486). https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr.cgi?function=brows&recptno=R000013441&language=J.

The efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) are more likely to suffer local recurrence and distant metastases, contributing to worse prognoses. Considering the provided dramatic reduction of local recurrences, neoadjuvant CRT (nCRT) followed by curative resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy has been established as standard therapy for LARC patients. However, the efficacy of adding bevacizumab in neoadjuvant therapy, especially in induction therapy-containing nCRT for LARC patients remains uncertain.

Materials

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to retrieve records on the application of bevacizumab in a neoadjuvant setting for LARC patients. The endpoints of interest were pCR and the rates of patients suffering Grade 3/4 bevacizumab-specific adverse events, namely bleeding, wound healing complications, and gastrointestinal perforation.

Results

29 cohorts covering 1134 subjects were included in this systematic review. The pooled pCR rate for bevacizumab-relevant cohorts was 21% (95% confidence interval (95% CI), 17–25%; I² = 61.8%), the pooled estimates of Grade 3/4 bleeding, Grade 3/4 wound healing complication, Grade 3/4 gastrointestinal perforation were 1% (95% CI, 0–3%; I² = 0%), 2% (95% CI, 1–5%; I² = 4.7%), and 2% (95% CI, 0–5%; I² = 0%), respectively.

Conclusion

The addition of bevacizumab in the nCRT, especially in the TNT, for LARC patients provides promising efficacy and acceptable safety. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the small amount of relevant data and need further confirmation by future studies.

Indications for neoadjuvant treatment based on risk factors for poor prognosis before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The oncological benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) alone for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical risk factors for poor prognosis before and after NAC for decision making regarding additional treatment in patients with LARC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined a total of 96 patients with MRI-defined poor-risk locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer treated by NAC alone between 2006 and 2018. Survival outcomes and clinical risk factors for poor prognosis before and after NAC were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the median follow-up duration after surgery of 60 months (3-120), the rates of 5-year overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and local recurrence (LR) were 83.6%, 78.4%, and 8.2%, respectively. In the multivariate analyses, patients with cT4 disease had a significantly higher risk of poor OS (HR; 6.10, 95% CI; 1.32-28.15, P = 0.021) than those with cT3 disease. After NAC, ycN+ was significantly associated with a higher risk of poor OS (HR; 5.92, 95% CI; 1.27-27.62, P = 0.024) and RFS (HR; 2.55, 95% CI; 1.01-6.48, P = 0.048) than ycN-. In addition, patients with CEA after NAC (post-CEA) ≥ 5 ng/ml had a significantly higher risk LR (HR; 5.63, 95% CI; 1.06-29.93, P = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

NAC alone had an insufficient survival effect on patients with cT4 disease, ycN+, or an elevated post-CEA level. In contrast, NAC alone is a potential treatment for other patients with LARC.

Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard regimen for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, whether and to which extent neoadjuvant radiotherapy could be removed from nCRT for patients with LARC is still unclear. This was a multicenter, retrospectively recruited, prospectively maintained cohort study. A propensity score matching model was employed to minimize potential confounding factors between subgroup patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or nCRT. Overall survival (OS), disease‐free survival (DFS), local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS) were assessed between subgroup patients by Kaplan‐Meier analysis, log‐rank test, and Cox regression model. In total, 3233 consecutive patients, consist of 571 nCT and 2662 nCRT‐treated cases, were included. After propensity score matching (1:4), 565 nCT‐treated patients were matched to 1852 nCRT‐treated patients. Compared with nCT, nCRT treatment indeed decreased 3‐y local recurrence (10.0% vs 6.6%, P = .026), but had no impact on OS, DFS and DMFS (all P > .05) for LARC. Stratified analysis further confirmed that nCRT treatment was associated with higher 3‐y LRFS and 3‐y DFS than nCT treatment for baseline high‐risk subgroup (cT4, cN+, and cIII stage) patients (all P < .05). Conversely, for the baseline low‐risk subgroup patients (cT3, cN0, and cII stage), nCRT and nCT treatment had similar 3‐y OS, LRFS, DFS, and DMFS (all P > .05). The administration of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for LARC patients might be determined by baseline risk classification, the high‐risk individuals could be delivered while low‐risk patients might be omitted.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy without Radiation in Colorectal Cancer

In colon cancer, primary surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy represents the standard of care. In rectal cancer, the standard of care is preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiation, which significantly reduces local recurrence but has no impact on subsequent metastatic disease or overall survival. The administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before surgery can increase the chance of a curative resection and improves long-term outcomes in patients with liver metastases. Hence, NACT is being explored in both primary rectal and colon cancers as an alternative strategy to shrink the tumor, facilitate a curative resection, and simultaneously counter the risk of metastases. Yet, this lack of clarity regarding the precise aims of NACT (downstaging, maximizing response, or improving survival) is hindering progress. The appropriate cytotoxic agents, the optimal regimen, the number of cycles, or duration of NACT prior to surgery or in the postoperative setting remains undefined. Several potential strategies for integrating NACT are discussed with their advantages and disadvantages.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Long-term Outcomes of CAPOX Plus Bevacizumab Followed by TME for High-risk Localized Rectal Cancer

Objectives:

We previously reported the feasibility of neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab as a treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (UMIN000003219). The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic relevance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by total mesorectal resection (TME).

Methods:

Twenty-five patients of our prior multicenter prospective study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by TME enrolled to this study. We analyzed the adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, and the duration between surgery and initial chemotherapy treatment. Five-year progression-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results:

Among survivors, the median follow-up time was 66 months. Recurrence occurred in six patients, all of whom had suboptimal tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Five patients died from other causes. The rate of local recurrence and distant metastasis was 17.4% and 8.7%, respectively. Five-year progression-free survival was 70.0%, and 5 year overall survival was 84.0%.

Conclusions:

We report the long-term survival of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation followed by TME, revealing a generally favorable prognosis.

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy alone for the locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review

Neo-adjuvant chemoradiation (NA-CRT) is the standard of management for the locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), achieving very low rates of local recurrence (LR). However, NA-CRT fails to control distant recurrence and improve survival, whilst it is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and increased acute and late toxicity. In recent years, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACTx) appears in the literature as an alternative to NA-CRT in patients with LARC. In the present study, the authors review all current evidence on the specific subject. Following a systematic search of the literature, 25 studies were identified reporting on short- or long-term outcomes of NACTx for LARC. Seventeen studies were prospective or retrospective series, and 8 comparative. Of the comparative studies, one was a randomized control trial (RCT) comparing NACTx to NA-CRT and to the combination of NACTx/NA-CRT, and another a non-randomized study comparing NACTx to NA-CRT. Chemotherapeutic regimens were 5-fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin based. In some of them, irinotecan or/and bevacizumab was added. A pooled analysis showed that NACTx is associated with a mean anastomotic leak rate of 6.8%. In the RCT, postoperative morbidity and overall toxicity was significantly less in the NACTx group. Mean T downstaging (ypStage 0-I) was 49.6%, mean N downstaging 69.6% and mean pathologic complete response (pCR) 10.7%. The RCT showed an inferior pCR rate after NACTx than after NA-CRT, but similar rates of T downstaging. Mean LR was 8.6% and mean distant recurrence 17.2%. Satisfactory survival rates are reported by several studies. NACTx seems to be an alternative to NA-CRT for patients with LARC, associated with low anastomotic leak, adequate tumour downstaging, low LR and rather high survival rates. Further data deriving from high-quality studies are necessary to assess safety and efficacy of NACTx as a substitute to NA-CRT, for at least a subset of patients with LARC.

A case of an enlarged rectal adenoma while achieving a clinical complete response with chemotherapy for advanced rectal cancer

The effect of chemotherapeutic agents on concomitant colorectal adenomas in patients with advanced colorectal cancer is not clear. We report a case of an enlarged rectal adenoma while achieving a clinical complete response with chemotherapy for an advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. A 78-year-old man was referred to our hospital for evaluation of bloody stools. The clinical diagnosis was an advanced lower rectal adenocarcinoma with para-aortic lymph node metastases, and a sessile polyp on the proximal aspect of the rectal tumor. The rectal adenocarcinoma was treated with chemotherapy, including 1 cycle of capecitabin plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX), 22 cycles of tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) plus irinotecan (IRIS), and 1 cycle of tegafur (UFT) plus calcium folinate (LV). One year after the last course of chemotherapy, colonoscopy showed a scar without visible rectal tumor; CT imaging confirmed no para-aortic lymphadenopathy. The patient had a clinical complete response to chemotherapy. In contrast, the polyp increased in size. The polyp was removed by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). The pathologic evaluation showed a well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma with adenoma localized in the mucosa. No recurrence of the advanced adenocarcinoma or intramucosal adenocarcinoma with adenoma occurred for 2 years after EMR. This case indicates the importance of careful surveillance for synchronous adenomas, even in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Pathological complete response after preoperative chemotherapy including FOLFOX plus bevacizumab for locally advanced rectal cancer: A case report and literature review

•

Preoperative chemotherapy alone for locally advanced rectal cancer remain unclear.

•

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was a promising treatment for unresectable rectal cancer.

•

Earlier preoperative systemic chemotherapy was assumed to prevent the dissemination.

Background

In Japan, the significance and efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy alone for locally advanced rectal cancer remain controversial. This case report presents the apparent effectiveness of preoperative FOLFOX plus bevacizumab as shown by pathological complete response (pCR). Additionally, we review the relevant literature and discuss the clinical management of locally advanced rectal cancer with preoperative chemotherapy.

Case presentation

A 59-year-old male presented with severe constipation, bloody stool and a loss of 10% of his body weight over 3 months. Preoperative examination revealed locally advanced rectal cancer with extensive invasion of the bladder wall and enlarged regional lymph nodes. Thus, this lesion was assigned a preoperative classification of T4bN2bM0 stage IIIC according to the 8^th Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) guidelines. Therefore, the patient initially underwent an external loop colostomy of the transverse colon. Next, the patient received chemotherapy including FOLFOX plus bevacizumab. After 12 cycles of chemotherapy, the tumor size was markedly decreased, and all lymph node metastases had disappeared. Therefore, the patient underwent conventional resection of the rectum with D3 lymph node dissection and closure of the colostomy. Histopathological analysis of the resected specimen revealed that all lesions were fibrotic and devoid of any viable cancer cells. Thus, this lesion was assigned a final classification of ypT0N0M0 stage 0.

Conclusions

We present the rare case of a patient with surgically resected locally advanced rectal cancer who demonstrated an impressive pCR with preoperative chemotherapy, which included FOLFOX plus bevacizumab.

Risk factors and prognostic significance of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to elucidate the risk factors for and prognostic value of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis in advanced rectal cancer patients, including those with stage IV disease.

METHODS

The treatment outcomes of 78 patients with advanced rectal cancer, the lower margin of which was located at or below the peritoneal reflection, who underwent curative-intent surgery with bilateral LPLN dissection from 2005 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 78 rectal cancer patients, including 13 patients with stage IV tumors, 9 patients (11.5%) had LPLN metastasis. A multivariate analysis to identify preoperative clinical factors associated with LPLN metastasis showed that tumor location (below the peritoneal reflection: Rb), LPLN metastasis on preoperative imaging and distant metastasis were independent predictors of LPLN metastasis. In addition, metastasis at the regional lymph nodes in the mesorectum was significantly associated with LPLN metastasis. Both the disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with LPLN metastasis were significantly worse in comparison to patients without LPLN metastasis, and the CSS of stage IV patients with LPLN metastasis was significantly worse in comparison to stage IV patients without LPLN metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor location (Rb), LPLN metastasis on preoperative imaging and distant metastasis were risk factors for LPLN metastasis. The prognosis of rectal cancer patients with LPLN metastasis is poor. There may not be the indication of LPLN dissection in stage IV lower rectal cancer except cases having complaints due to LPLN metastasis.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With mFOLFOXIRI Without Routine Use of Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Although neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) achieves low local recurrence rates in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), it raises a lot of concerns about long-term anal and sexual functions. We explored the efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) in patients with LARC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with LARC evaluated by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were enrolled in this trial. All received 4 to 6 cycles of mFOLFOXIRI. MRI was performed to assess clinical response after chemotherapy. Patients with mesorectal fascia-positive or ycT4a/b after re-evaluation would receive radiation before surgery, whereas responders would have immediate total mesorectal excision (TME). Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) was recommended. The primary endpoint was the proportion of tumor downstaging to ypT_0-2N₀M₀. The secondary endpoints were pathologic complete response rate (pCR), 3-year disease-free survival rate, and safety.

RESULTS

Overall, 106 patients were enrolled and received neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI chemotherapy. A total of 103 participants underwent TME surgery. Among 103 patients who completed at least 4 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy, 2 received short-term radiation before TME, and 12 underwent long-term CRT after MRI evaluation. The pCR rate was 20.4%, and the tumor downstaging rate was 42.7%. Among patients without preoperative long-term radiotherapy, the pCR rate and tumor downstaging rate were 17.4% and 41.3%, respectively. Among the per-protocol population, the tumor downstaging rate was 48.1%, and the pCR rate was 20.3%. The chemotherapy-related toxicity was well-tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI and selective radiation does not seem to compromise outcomes in LARC. It could be a reasonable alternative to CRT in previously untreated patients with LARC.

Total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Role of systemic chemotherapy

For the past several decades, disease-related outcomes, particularly local recurrence rate, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer have significantly improved as a result of advancement of surgical technique and implementation of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. However, distant metastasis remains unresolved, being a significant cause of cancer death. To focus on micrometastases early in the course of multimodal treatment, delivering systemic chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting is emerging. Also, driven by patient demand and interest in preserving quality of life, upfront chemotherapy prior to surgery serves as a strategy for organ preservation in the management of rectal cancer. Herein, currently available literature on different methods and strategies of the multimodal approach is critically appraised.

Phase I/II trial of nano-camptothecin CRLX101 with capecitabine and radiotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer

CRLX101 is a nanoparticle-drug conjugate with a camptothecin payload. We assessed the toxicity and pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of CRLX101 with standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer. A single-arm study was conducted with a 3 + 3 dose escalation phase Ib followed by phase II at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Thirty-two patients were enrolled with 29 (91%) patients having T3/4 and 26 (81%) N1/2 disease. In phase Ib, no patient experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) with every other week dosing, while 1/9 patients experienced a DLT with weekly dosing. The weekly MTD was identified as 15 mg/m². The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was lymphopenia, with only 1 grade 4 event. pCR was achieved in 6/32 (19%) patients overall and 2/6 (33%) patients at the weekly MTD. CRLX101 at 15 mg/m² weekly with neoadjuvant CRT is a feasible combination strategy with an excellent toxicity profile. Clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT02010567.

Novelties in treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer

Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer is evolving through surgical innovation and paradigm shifts in neoadjuvant treatment. Whereas local recurrence was a significant concern before the systematic implementation of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and surgery according to total mesorectal excision principles, distant relapse remains a major drawback. Hence, efforts in recent years have focused on delivering preoperative chemotherapy regimens to overcome compliance issues with adjuvant administration. In parallel, new surgical techniques, including transanal video-assisted total mesorectal excision and robot-assisted surgery, emerged to face the challenge to navigate in the deep and narrow spaces of the pelvis. Furthermore, patients experiencing a complete response after neoadjuvant treatment might even escape surgery within a close surveillance strategy. This novel "watch and wait" concept has gained interest to improve quality of life in highly selected patients. This review summarizes recent evidence and controversies and provides an overview on timely and innovative aspects in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.