Phosphorylation of RGS13 by the cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase inhibits RGS13 degradation

RGS proteins and their roles in cancer: friend or foe?

As negative modulators of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) signaling, regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins facilitate various downstream cellular signalings through regulating kinds of heterotrimeric G proteins by stimulating the guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) activity of G-protein α (Gα) subunits. The expression of RGS proteins is dynamically and precisely mediated by several different mechanisms including epigenetic regulation, transcriptional regulation -and post-translational regulation. Emerging evidence has shown that RGS proteins act as important mediators in controlling essential cellular processes including cell proliferation, survival -and death via regulating downstream cellular signaling activities, indicating that RGS proteins are fundamentally involved in sustaining normal physiological functions and dysregulation of RGS proteins (such as aberrant expression of RGS proteins) is closely associated with pathologies of many diseases such as cancer. In this review, we summarize the molecular mechanisms governing the expression of RGS proteins, and further discuss the relationship of RGS proteins and cancer.

Regulators of G protein signaling in cardiovascular function during pregnancy

G protein-coupled receptor signaling mechanisms are implicated in many aspects of cardiovascular control, and dysfunction of such signaling mechanisms is commonly associated with disease states. Investigators have identified a large number of regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins that variously contribute to the modulation of intracellular second-messenger signaling kinetics. These many RGS proteins each interact with a specific set of second-messenger cascades and receptor types and exhibit tissue-specific expression patterns. Increasing evidence supports the contribution of RGS proteins, or their loss, in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular dysfunctions. This review summarizes the current understanding of the functional contributions of RGS proteins, particularly within the B/R4 family, in cardiovascular disorders of pregnancy including gestational hypertension, uterine artery dysfunction, and preeclampsia.

Systematic Proteogenomic Approach To Exploring a Novel Function for NHERF1 in Human Reproductive Disorder: Lessons for Exploring Missing Proteins

One of the major goals of the Chromosome-Centric Human Proteome Project (C-HPP) is to fill the knowledge gaps between human genomic information and the corresponding proteomic information. These gaps are due to "missing" proteins (MPs)-predicted proteins with insufficient evidence from mass spectrometry (MS), biochemical, structural, or antibody analyses-that currently account for 2579 of the 19587 predicted human proteins (neXtProt, 2017-01). We address some of the lessons learned from the inconsistent annotations of missing proteins in databases (DB) and demonstrate a systematic proteogenomic approach designed to explore a potential new function of a known protein. To illustrate a cautious and strategic approach for characterization of novel function in vitro and in vivo, we present the case of Na(+)/H(+) exchange regulatory cofactor 1 (NHERF1/SLC9A3R1, located at chromosome 17q25.1; hereafter NHERF1), which was mistakenly labeled as an MP in one DB (Global Proteome Machine Database; GPMDB, 2011-09 release) but was well known in another public DB and in the literature. As a first step, NHERF1 was determined by MS and immunoblotting for its molecular identity. We next investigated the potential new function of NHERF1 by carrying out the quantitative MS profiling of placental trophoblasts (PXD004723) and functional study of cytotrophoblast JEG-3 cells. We found that NHERF1 was associated with trophoblast differentiation and motility. To validate this newly found cellular function of NHERF1, we used the Caenorhabditis elegans mutant of nrfl-1 (a nematode ortholog of NHERF1), which exhibits a protruding vulva (Pvl) and egg-laying-defective phenotype, and performed genetic complementation work. The nrfl-1 mutant was almost fully rescued by the transfection of the recombinant transgenic construct that contained human NHERF1. These results suggest that NHERF1 could have a previously unknown function in pregnancy and in the development of human embryos. Our study outlines a stepwise experimental platform to explore new functions of ambiguously denoted candidate proteins and scrutinizes the mandated DB search for the selection of MPs to study in the future.

Regulating the regulators: Epigenetic, transcriptional, and post-translational regulation of RGS proteins

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) are a family of proteins classically known to accelerate the intrinsic GTPase activity of G proteins, which results in accelerated inactivation of heterotrimeric G proteins and inhibition of G protein coupled receptor signaling. RGS proteins play major roles in essential cellular processes, and dysregulation of RGS protein expression is implicated in multiple diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. The expression of RGS proteins is highly dynamic and is regulated by epigenetic, transcriptional and post-translational mechanisms. This review summarizes studies that report dysregulation of RGS protein expression in disease states, and presents examples of drugs that regulate RGS protein expression. Additionally, this review discusses, in detail, the transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms regulating RGS protein expression, and further assesses the therapeutic potential of targeting these mechanisms. Understanding the molecular mechanisms controlling the expression of RGS proteins is essential for the development of therapeutics that indirectly modulate G protein signaling by regulating expression of RGS proteins.

Phosphorylation-Dependent Regulation of G-Protein Cycle during Nodule Formation in Soybean

Signaling pathways mediated by heterotrimeric G-protein complexes comprising Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits and their regulatory RGS (Regulator of G-protein Signaling) protein are conserved in all eukaryotes. We have shown that the specific Gβ and Gγ proteins of a soybean (Glycine max) heterotrimeric G-protein complex are involved in regulation of nodulation. We now demonstrate the role of Nod factor receptor 1 (NFR1)-mediated phosphorylation in regulation of the G-protein cycle during nodulation in soybean. We also show that during nodulation, the G-protein cycle is regulated by the activity of RGS proteins. Lower or higher expression of RGS proteins results in fewer or more nodules, respectively. NFR1 interacts with RGS proteins and phosphorylates them. Analysis of phosphorylated RGS protein identifies specific amino acids that, when phosphorylated, result in significantly higher GTPase accelerating activity. These data point to phosphorylation-based regulation of G-protein signaling during nodule development. We propose that active NFR1 receptors phosphorylate and activate RGS proteins, which help maintain the Gα proteins in their inactive, trimeric conformation, resulting in successful nodule development. Alternatively, RGS proteins might also have a direct role in regulating nodulation because overexpression of their phospho-mimic version leads to partial restoration of nodule formation in nod49 mutants.

RGS2 suppresses breast cancer cell growth via a MCPIP1-dependent pathway

Regulator of G protein signaling 2 (RGS2) is a member of a family of proteins that functions as a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for Gα subunits. RGS2 mRNA expression is lower in breast cancerous tissues than in normal tissues. In addition, expression of RGS2 is also lower in MCF7 (cancerous breast cells) than in MCF10A (normal breast cells). Here we investigated whether RGS2 inhibits growth of breast cancer cells. RGS2 overexpression in MCF7 cells inhibited epidermal growth factor- or serum-induced proliferation. In HEK293T cells expressing RGS2, cell growth was also significantly suppressed (In addition, exogenous expression of RGS2 in HEK293T cells resulted in the significant suppression of cell growth). These results suggest that RGS2 may have a tumor suppressor function. MG-132 treatment of MCF7 cells increased endogenous or exogenous RGS2 levels, suggesting a post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism that controls RGS2 protein levels. RGS2 protein was degraded polyubiquitinated the K71 residue, but stabilized by deubiquitinase monocyte chemotactic protein-induced protein 1 (MCPIP1), and not affected by dominant negative mutant (C157A) of MCPIP1. Gene expression profiling study showed that overexpression of RGS2 decreased levels of testis specific Y encoded like protein 5 (TSPYL5), which plays a causal role in breast oncogenesis. TSPYL5 protein expression was low in MCF10A and high in MCF7 cells, showing the opposite aspect to RGS2 expression. Additionally, RGS2 or MCPIP1 overexpression in MCF7 cells decreased TSPYL5 protein level, indicating that RGS2 stabilized by MCPIP1 have diminished TSPYL5 protein levels, thereby exerting an inhibitory effect of breast cancer cell growth.

Regulators of G-protein-signaling proteins: negative modulators of G-protein-coupled receptor signaling

Regulators of G-protein-signaling (RGS) proteins are a category of intracellular proteins that have an inhibitory effect on the intracellular signaling produced by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). RGS along with RGS-like proteins switch on through direct contact G-alpha subunits providing a variety of intracellular functions through intracellular signaling. RGS proteins have a common RGS domain that binds to G alpha. RGS proteins accelerate GTPase and thus enhance guanosine triphosphate hydrolysis through the alpha subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins. As a result, they inactivate the G protein and quickly turn off GPCR signaling thus terminating the resulting downstream signals. Activity and subcellular localization of RGS proteins can be changed through covalent molecular changes to the enzyme, differential gene splicing, and processing of the protein. Other roles of RGS proteins have shown them to not be solely committed to being inhibitors but behave more as modulators and integrators of signaling. RGS proteins modulate the duration and kinetics of slow calcium oscillations and rapid phototransduction and ion signaling events. In other cases, RGS proteins integrate G proteins with signaling pathways linked to such diverse cellular responses as cell growth and differentiation, cell motility, and intracellular trafficking. Human and animal studies have revealed that RGS proteins play a vital role in physiology and can be ideal targets for diseases such as those related to addiction where receptor signaling seems continuously switched on.

Protein folding creates structure-based, noncontiguous consensus phosphorylation motifs recognized by kinases

Linear consensus motifs are short contiguous sequences of residues within a protein that can form recognition modules for protein interaction or catalytic modification. Protein kinase specificity and the matching of kinases to substrates have been mostly defined by phosphorylation sites that occur in linear consensus motifs. However, phosphorylation can also occur within sequences that do not match known linear consensus motifs recognized by kinases and within flexible loops. We report the identification of Thr(253) in α-tubulin as a site that is phosphorylated by protein kinase C βI (PKCβI). Thr(253) is not part of a linear PKC consensus motif. Instead, Thr(253) occurs within a region on the surface of α-tubulin that resembles a PKC phosphorylation site consensus motif formed by basic residues in different parts of the protein, which come together in the folded protein to form the recognition motif for PKCβI. Mutations of these basic residues decreased substrate phosphorylation, confirming the presence of this "structurally formed" consensus motif and its importance for the protein kinase-substrate interaction. Analysis of previously reported protein kinase A (PKA) and PKC substrates identified sites within structurally formed consensus motifs in many substrates of these two kinase families. Thus, the concept of consensus phosphorylation site motif needs to be expanded to include sites within these structurally formed consensus motifs.

Role of regulator of G protein signaling proteins in bone

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are a family with more than 30 proteins that all contain an RGS domain. In the past decade, increasing evidence has indicated that RGS proteins play crucial roles in the regulation of G protein coupling receptors (GPCR), G proteins, and calcium signaling during cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation in a variety of tissues. In bone, those proteins modulate bone development and remodeling by influencing various signaling pathways such as GPCR-G protein signaling, Wnt, calcium oscillations and PTH. This review summarizes the recent advances in the understanding of the regulation of RGS gene expression, as well as the functions and mechanisms of RGS proteins, especially in regulating GPCR-G protein signaling, Wnt signaling, calcium oscillations signaling and PTH signaling during bone development and remodeling. This review also highlights the regulation of different RGS proteins in osteoblasts, chondrocytes and osteoclasts. The knowledge from the recent advances of RGS study summarized in the review would provide the insights into new therapies for bone diseases.

Extension of the germinal center stage of B cell development promotes autoantibodies in BXD2 mice

OBJECTIVE

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins inhibit chemokine signaling by desensitizing G protein-coupled receptor signals. This study was undertaken to determine the mechanisms by which RGS13 promotes the generation of pathogenic autoantibodies in germinal centers (GCs), using BXD2-Rgs13-/- mice.

METHODS

Confocal and light microscopy imaging techniques were used to determine the location of cells that express RGS13 and activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) in the mouse spleen, and the number of plasmablasts. The levels of GC and plasma cell program transcripts in GC B cells were determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Differential interleukin-17 (IL-17)-mediated expression of RGS13 in GC versus non-GC B cells was analyzed using A20 and 70Z/3 B cells.

RESULTS

In the spleens of BXD2 mice, RGS13 was mainly expressed by GC B cells and was stimulated by IL-17 but not IL-21. IL-17 up-regulated RGS13 in A20 GC cells but not 70Z/3 non-GC B cells. BXD2- Rgs13-/- mice exhibited smaller GCs and lower AID levels, suggesting lower somatic hypermutation and affinity maturation. However, GC B cells from BXD2- Rgs13-/- mice showed increased levels of IgMbright plasmablasts, up-regulation of the genes encoding plasma program, including interferon regulatory factor 4, B lymphocyte-induced maturation protein 1, and X-box binding protein 1 and the p-CREB target genes Fosb and Obf1, and down-regulation of the GC program genes Aid, Pax5, and Bach2 compared to BXD2 mice. BXD2-Rgs13-/- mice had lower titers of IgG autoantibodies and IgG deposits in the glomeruli, suggesting reduced autoantibody pathogenicity.

CONCLUSION

RGS13 deficiency is associated with a reduction in GC program genes and the exit of fewer pathogenic IgM plasmablasts in BXD2 mice. Our findings indicate that prolonged GC program, mediated by up-regulation of RGS13, enhances AID expression and enables the generation of pathogenic autoantibodies in autoreactive GCs.

A finer tuning of G-protein signaling through regulated control of RGS proteins

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins are GTPase-activating proteins (GAP) for various Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. Through this mechanism, RGS proteins regulate the magnitude and duration of G-protein-coupled receptor signaling and are often referred to as fine tuners of G-protein signaling. Increasing evidence suggests that RGS proteins themselves are regulated through multiple mechanisms, which may provide an even finer tuning of G-protein signaling and crosstalk between G-protein-coupled receptors and other signaling pathways. This review summarizes the current data on the control of RGS function through regulated expression, intracellular localization, and covalent modification of RGS proteins, as related to cell function and the pathogenesis of diseases.

Regulators of G-protein signaling in the heart and their potential as therapeutic targets

Signal transduction through G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is central for the regulation of virtually all cellular functions and has been widely implicated in human disease. Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS proteins) belong to a diverse protein family that was originally discovered for their ability to accelerate signal termination in response to GPCR stimulation, thereby reducing the amplitude and duration of GPCR effects. All RGS proteins share a common RGS domain that interacts with G protein α subunits and mediates their biological regulation of GPCR signaling. However, RGS proteins differ widely in size and the organization of their sequences flanking the RGS domain, which contain several additional functional domains that facilitate protein-protein (or protein-lipid) interactions. RGS proteins are subject to posttranslational modifications, and, in addition, their expression, activity, and subcellular localization can be dynamically regulated. Thus, there exists a wide array of mechanisms that facilitate their proper function as modulators and integrators of G-protein signaling. Several RGS proteins have been implicated in the cardiac remodeling response and heart rate regulation, and changes in RGS protein expression and/or function are believed to participate in the pathophysiology of cardiac hypertrophy, failure and arrhythmias as well as hypertension. This review is based on recent advances in our understanding of the expression pattern, regulation, and functional role of canonical RGS proteins, with a special focus on the healthy heart and the diseased heart. In addition, we discuss their potential and promise as therapeutic targets as well as strategies to modulate their expression and function.

p53 negatively regulates RGS13 protein expression in immune cells

RGS13, a member of the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) family, inhibits G protein-coupled receptor signaling in B cells and mast cells (MCs) and suppresses IgE-antigen-induced MC degranulation and anaphylaxis. Although RGS13 expression is induced by immune receptor and chemokine receptor stimulation, the molecular regulation of RGS13 transcription is unknown. Here, we investigated the role of two p53 response elements (REs) in the regulation of RGS13 promoter activity and expression. We found that a 1000-bp DNA fragment upstream of the ATG translation start site (TSS) had promoter activity in reporter gene assays, and deletion or mutation of a p53-binding motif nearest the TSS abolished promoter activity. Notably, p53 bound to both REs in the RGS13 promoter in vivo as assessed by chromatin immunoprecipitation, suggesting that the p53 RE most distal to the TSS is physiologically inactive. We detected reduced RGS13 expression in MCs exogenously expressing p53 or treated with doxorubicin, which induces genotoxic stress and leads to p53 accumulation. RNA silencing of p53 up-regulated RGS13 expression in B lymphocytes, and bone marrow-derived MCs from p53(-/-) mice had increased RGS13 expression. Finally, p53-depleted B cells with increased RGS13 expression had reduced Ca(2+) mobilization in response to sphingosine 1-phosphate. These studies indicate that p53 may modulate immune responses through suppression of RGS13 transcription in MCs and B cells.

Regulator of G protein signaling proteins as drug targets: current state and future possibilities

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins have emerged in the past two decades as novel drug targets in many areas of research. Their importance in regulating signaling via G protein-coupled receptors has become evident as numerous studies have been published on the structure and function of RGS proteins. A number of genetic models have also been developed, demonstrating the potential clinical importance of RGS proteins in various disease states, including central nervous system disorders, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and several types of cancer. Apart from their classical mechanism of action as GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), RGS proteins can also serve other noncanonical functions. This opens up a new approach to targeting RGS proteins in drug discovery as the view on the function of these proteins is constantly evolving. This chapter summarizes the latest development in RGS protein drug discovery with special emphasis on noncanonical functions and regulatory mechanisms of RGS protein expression. As more reports are being published on this group of proteins, it is becoming clear that modulation of GAP activity might not be the only way to therapeutically target RGS proteins.