Microsatellite instability, prognosis and drug sensitivity of stage II and III colorectal cancer: more complexity to the puzzle

Cellular and molecular events in colorectal cancer: biological mechanisms, cell death pathways, drug resistance and signalling network interactions

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, affecting millions each year. It emerges from the colon or rectum, parts of the digestive system, and is closely linked to both genetic and environmental factors. In CRC, genetic mutations such as APC, KRAS, and TP53, along with epigenetic changes like DNA methylation and histone modifications, play crucial roles in tumor development and treatment responses. This paper delves into the complex biological underpinnings of CRC, highlighting the pivotal roles of genetic alterations, cell death pathways, and the intricate network of signaling interactions that contribute to the disease's progression. It explores the dysregulation of apoptosis, autophagy, and other cell death mechanisms, underscoring the aberrant activation of these pathways in CRC. Additionally, the paper examines how mutations in key molecular pathways, including Wnt, EGFR/MAPK, and PI3K, fuel CRC development, and how these alterations can serve as both diagnostic and prognostic markers. The dual function of autophagy in CRC, acting as a tumor suppressor or promoter depending on the context, is also scrutinized. Through a comprehensive analysis of cellular and molecular events, this research aims to deepen our understanding of CRC and pave the way for more effective diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutic strategies.

Unique characteristics of the tumor immune microenvironment in young patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Introduction

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains a common and highly morbid disease, with a recent increase in incidence in patients younger than 50 years. There is an acute need to better understand differences in tumor biology, molecular characteristics, and other age-related differences in the tumor microenvironment (TME).

Methods

111 patients undergoing curative-intent resection of colorectal liver metastases were stratified by age into those <50 years or >65 years old, and tumors were subjected to multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry (mfIHC) to characterize immune infiltration and cellular engagement.

Results

There was no difference in infiltration or proportion of immune cells based upon age, but the younger cohort had a higher proportion of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)+ expressing antigen presenting cells (APCs) and demonstrated decreased intercellular distance and increased cellular engagement between tumor cells (TCs) and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), and between TCs and APCs. These trends were independent of microsatellite instability in tumors.

Discussion

Age-related differences in PD-L1 expression and cellular engagement in the tumor microenvironment of patients with mCRC, findings which were unrelated to microsatellite status, suggest a more active immune microenvironment in younger patients that may offer an opportunity for therapeutic intervention with immune based therapy.

Treatment strategies and drug resistance mechanisms in adenocarcinoma of different organs

Adenocarcinoma is a common type of malignant tumor, originating from glandular epithelial cells in various organs, such as pancreas, breast, lung, stomach, colon, rectus, and prostate. For patients who lose the opportunity for radical surgery, medication is available to provide potential clinical benefits. However, drug resistance is a big obstacle to obtain desired clinical prognosis. In this review, we provide a summary of treatment strategies and drug resistance mechanisms in adenocarcinoma of different organs, including pancreatic cancer, gastric adenocarcinoma, colorectal adenocarcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, and prostate cancer. Although the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in drug resistance of adenocarcinoma vary from one organ to the other, there are several targets that are universal for drug resistance in adenocarcinoma, and targeting these molecules could potentially reverse drug resistance in the treatment of adenocarcinomas.

Pathobionts in the tumour microbiota predict survival following resection for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The gut microbiota is implicated in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to map the CRC mucosal microbiota and metabolome and define the influence of the tumoral microbiota on oncological outcomes.

METHODS

A multicentre, prospective observational study was conducted of CRC patients undergoing primary surgical resection in the UK (n = 74) and Czech Republic (n = 61). Analysis was performed using metataxonomics, ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS), targeted bacterial qPCR and tumour exome sequencing. Hierarchical clustering accounting for clinical and oncological covariates was performed to identify clusters of bacteria and metabolites linked to CRC. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to ascertain clusters associated with disease-free survival over median follow-up of 50 months.

RESULTS

Thirteen mucosal microbiota clusters were identified, of which five were significantly different between tumour and paired normal mucosa. Cluster 7, containing the pathobionts Fusobacterium nucleatum and Granulicatella adiacens, was strongly associated with CRC (P_FDR = 0.0002). Additionally, tumoral dominance of cluster 7 independently predicted favourable disease-free survival (adjusted p = 0.031). Cluster 1, containing Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Ruminococcus gnavus, was negatively associated with cancer (P_FDR = 0.0009), and abundance was independently predictive of worse disease-free survival (adjusted p = 0.0009). UPLC-MS analysis revealed two major metabolic (Met) clusters. Met 1, composed of medium chain (MCFA), long-chain (LCFA) and very long-chain (VLCFA) fatty acid species, ceramides and lysophospholipids, was negatively associated with CRC (P_FDR = 2.61 × 10^-11); Met 2, composed of phosphatidylcholine species, nucleosides and amino acids, was strongly associated with CRC (P_FDR = 1.30 × 10^-12), but metabolite clusters were not associated with disease-free survival (p = 0.358). An association was identified between Met 1 and DNA mismatch-repair deficiency (p = 0.005). FBXW7 mutations were only found in cancers predominant in microbiota cluster 7.

CONCLUSIONS

Networks of pathobionts in the tumour mucosal niche are associated with tumour mutation and metabolic subtypes and predict favourable outcome following CRC resection. Video Abstract.

MiR-6511b-5p suppresses metastasis of pMMR colorectal cancer through methylation of CD44 by directly targeting BRG1

PURPOSE

Distal metastases are a major cause of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Approximately 95% of metastatic colorectal cancers are defined as DNA mismatch repair proficient (pMMR). Our previous study found that miR-6511b-5p was downregulated in pMMR colorectal cancer. However, the mechanism of miR-6511b-5p in pMMR colorectal cancer metastases remain unclear.

METHODS

We first used quantitative real-time PCR to evaluate the role of miR-6511b-5p in colorectal cancer. Second, we conducted invasion assays and wound healing assays to investigate the role of miR-6511b-5p and CD44 in colorectal cancer cells metastases. Third, luciferase reporter assay, in situ hybridization (ISH), and immunohistochemistry assays were performed to study the relationship between miR-6511b-5p and BRG1. Finally, real-time quantitative PCR, immunohistochemistry, and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were performed to analyze the relationship between BRG1 and CD44 in colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

We found that lower expression of miR-6511b-5p appeared more often in pMMR colorectal cancer patients compared with dMMR (mismatch repair deficient) cases, and was positively correlated with metastases. In vitro, overexpression of miR-6511b-5p inhibited metastasis by decreasing CD44 expression via directly targeting BRG1 in colorectal cancer. Furthermore, BRG1 knockdown decreased the expression of CD44 by promoting CD44 methylation in colorectal cancer cells.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that miR-6511b-5p may act as a promising biomarker and treatment target for pMMR colorectal cancer, particularly in metastatic patients. Mechanistically, miR-6511b-5p suppresses invasion and migration of colorectal cancer cells through methylation of CD44 via directly targeting BRG1.

Detection of MSH2 Gene Methylation in Extramammary Paget's Disease by Methylation-Sensitive High-Resolution Melting Analysis

Background

Extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) is a rare skin tumor. Hypermethylation in the MSH2 promoter resulting in the downregulation of its protein expression shows a high detection rate in EMPD tumor tissue, which indicates that the methylation of MSH2 may play an important role in the pathogenesis of EMPD.

Objective

This study aims to establish a rapid analysis strategy based on the methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting curve (MS-HRM) to detect the methylation level of the MSH2 promoter.

Methods

With the use of universal methylated human DNA products, we established the MS-HRM standard curve to quantitatively detect the methylation level of the MSH2 promoter. Then, all 57 EMPD tumor DNA samples were analyzed. Pyrosequencing assay was also carried out to test the accuracy and efficacy of MS-HRM. Besides, a total of 54 human normal and other cancerous tissues were included in this study to test the reliability and versatility of the MS-HRM standard curve.

Results

In this study, by using the established MS-HRM, we found that 96.5% (55/57) EMPD tumor samples had varying methylation levels in the MSH2 promoter ranging from 0% to 30%. Then, the methylation data were compared to the results obtained from pyrosequencing, which showed a high correlation between these two techniques by Pearson's correlation (r = 0.9425) and Bland–Altman plots (mean difference = −0.1069) indicating that the methylation levels analyzed by MS-HRM were consistent with DNA pyrosequencing. Furthermore, in 23 normal and 31 other cancerous tissue samples, there were two colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues that tested MSH2 methylation positive (1% and 5%) which confirmed that our established MS-HRM can be widely applied to various types of samples.

Conclusion

MS-HRM standard curve can be used for the detection of the methylation level of MSH2 in EMPD tumor samples and other cancerous tissues potentially, which presents a promising candidate as a quantitative assay to analyze MSH2 promoter methylation in routine pathological procedure.

[Influence of molecular markers on oncological surgery of colorectal cancer]

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is still a very common disease and one of the best characterized malignancies on a molecular level. Interdisciplinary and multimodal treatment strategies should be preferred. In addition to surgical resection in localized stages as well as metastasectomy for oligometastatic advanced stages, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for localized rectal cancer and cytostatic treatment, targeted treatment approaches should also be considered. This overview presents established and novel prognostic and predictive molecular markers of (metastasized) CRC and describes these as targeted therapy options. The determination of high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) has a therapeutic influence when planning adjuvant therapy and also now in the treatment of metastatic CRC. Furthermore, circulating tumor DNA represents a promising marker with respect to a recurrence in early as well as in advanced stages of disease. In addition to the RAS and BRAF mutation status and the localization of the primary tumor, an MSI‑H is also important with respect to the treatment strategy and should be determined before initiation of first-line treatment in metastasized CRC. New pharmaceutical approaches enable targeted interventions at the immunological or molecular level. The understanding of CRC as a heterogeneous disease has been increased using recently established analyses at the molecular level; however, it also generated many hypotheses that require further evaluation with respect to their clinical importance. Special attention is paid to patients affected by hereditary syndromes because of the early onset of disease and the considerable consequences individually and for the patient's family.

How I treat stage II colon cancer patients

Stage II colon cancer (CC) is probably one of the best prognosis gastrointestinal tumors seen in our consultations, but often takes a lot of time for physicians to determine appropriate treatment because of the limited benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in these patients, together with the limited evidence in this situation. How to choose the best treatment for each individual patient is thus dependent on molecular (microsatellite instability/microsatellite stability status) and clinico-pathological features relevant enough to classify these tumors into low-, intermediate- and high-risk stage II disease and to choose an appropriate attitude for each of these subgroups. In practice, the first step in treatment decision making must be to assess the patient's status and comorbidities to see if the patient is eligible for an adjuvant treatment. Then, as fluoropyrimidines (FPs) are the corner stone of CC adjuvant treatment, screening for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency is mandatory in western countries. Finally, depending on the patient's characteristics and tumor risk stage, the strategy may be surveillance, adjuvant FP alone or oxaliplatin-based adjuvant CT. In the near future, new tools such as Immunoscore® (HalioDx; Luminy Biotech Enterprises, Marseille Cedex, France) and circulating tumor DNA may help to identify more precisely patients with minimal residual disease for more personalized adjuvant treatment approaches.

•

Stage II CC is a heterogeneous disease with a complex management due to the limited data and benefit of adjuvant CT.

•

Risk stratification through prognostic parameters is crucial to aid clinicians in determining the appropriate therapy.

•

Lymph node sampling <12 and pT4 are currently recognized as the major prognostic features associated with worse survival.

•

Adjuvant CT should be considered by incorporating prognostic features and balanced against patient's age and comorbidities.

A phase 2 trial of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma with methylated checkpoint with forkhead and ring finger domain promoter and/or microsatellite instability phenotype

Abstract

We previously reported CHFR methylation in a subset of colorectal cancer (CRC; ∼30%) with high concordance with microsatellite instability (MSI). We also showed that CHFR methylation predicted for sensitivity to docetaxel, whereas the MSI‐high phenotypes were sensitive to gemcitabine. We hypothesized that this subset of patients with CRC would be selectively sensitive to gemcitabine and docetaxel. We enrolled a Phase 2 trial of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with MSI‐high and/or CHFR methylated CRC. The primary objective was Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 response rate. Enrolled patients were treated with gemcitabine 800 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel 70 mg/m² on day 8 of each 21‐day cycle. A total of 6 patients with CHFR‐methylated, MSI‐high CRC were enrolled from September 2012 to August 2016. The study was closed in September of 2017 due to poor accrual prior to reaching the first interim assessment of response rate, which would have occurred at 10 patients. No RECIST criteria tumor responses were observed, with 3 patients (50%) having stable disease as best response, 1 lasting more than 9 months. Median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 1.79 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28, not available [NA]) and median overall survival (OS) was 15.67 months (95% CI = 4.24, NA). Common grade 3 toxicities were lymphopenia (67%), leukopenia (33%), and anemia (33%). Although negative, this study establishes a proof‐of‐concept for the implementation of epigenetic biomarkers (CHFR methylation/MSI) as inclusion criteria in a prospective clinical trial to optimize combinatorial strategies in the era of personalized medicine.

Historical review of Lynch syndrome

Lynch syndrome was formerly known as Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer. Currently, these two nomenclatures each have their unique definitions and are no longer used interchangeably. The history of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer was first recognized formally in the literature by Henry Lynch in 1967. With advances of molecular genetics, there has been a transformation from clinical phenotype to genotype diagnostics. This has led to the ability to diagnose affected patients before they manifest with cancer, and therefore allow preventative surveillance strategies. Genotype diagnostics has shown a difference in penetrance of different cancer risks dependent on the gene containing the mutation. Surgery is recommended as prevention for some cancers; for others they are reserved for once cancer is noted. Various surveillance strategies are recommended dependent on the relative risk of cancer and the ability to intervene with surgery to impact on survival. Risk reduction through aspirin has shown some recent promise, and continues to be studied.

Expression of Thomsen-Friedenreich Antigen in Colorectal Cancer and Association with Microsatellite Instability

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a molecular phenotype due to a deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR). In colorectal cancer (CRC), dMMR/MSI is associated with several clinical and histopathological features, influences prognosis, and is a predictive factor of response to therapy. In daily practice, dMMR/MSI profiles are identified by immunohistochemistry and/or multiplex PCR. The Thomsen-Friedenreich (TF) antigen was previously found to be a potential single marker to identify MSI-high gastric cancers. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to disclose a possible association between TF expression and MSI status in CRC. Furthermore, we evaluated the relationship between TF expression and other clinicopathological features, including patient survival. We evaluated the expression of the TF antigen in a cohort of 25 MSI-high and 71 microsatellite stable (MSS) CRCs. No association was observed between the expression of the TF antigen and MSI-high status in CRC. The survival analysis revealed that patients with MSI-high CRC showed improved survival when the TF antigen was expressed. This finding holds promise as it indicates the potential use of the TF antigen as a biomarker of better prognosis in MSI-high CRCs that should be validated in an independent and larger CRC cohort.

Evaluation of a Fully Automated Idylla Test System for Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a phenotype commonly observed in colorectal cancer, and is caused by a deficient mismatch repair system. Determining MSI status greatly aids tumor prognosis and treatment plans in colorectal cancer, and plays a critical role in recent United States Food and Drug Administration-approved immunotherapies. As recognition of its importance grows, MSI has been identified in more types of cancers, underscoring the importance of accurate assays for determining MSI status in tumor cells. Currently, tumor MSI status is detected via polymerase chain reaction-based methods or immunohistochemistry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we tested a new, fully automated MSI detection system (Idylla MSI detection kit) released by Biocartis. We evaluated 42 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues, which were clinically tested for MSI status using the polymerase chain reaction or immunohistochemistry method, with the Idylla MSI detection system.

RESULTS

The Idylla MSI detection system showed an overall 97.62% concordance rate with previously used methods. Moreover, this fully automated system requires less than 5 minutes "hands on" preparation time and 150 minutes total run time per sample.

CONCLUSION

The Biocartis Idylla MSI kit proves a powerful tool to accurately detect MSI status in tumor cells in a rapid and almost labor-free manner.

Molecular classification of colorectal cancer using the gene expression profile of tumor samples

Molecular classifications of colorectal cancer are benefitting cancer research by providing insights into subtype-specific disease prognosis and improved therapeutic interventions. Different conventional DNA markers, such as microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, chromosomal instability, and BRAF and KRAS mutations, have been used to classify colorectal cancer patients but have not yet shown promising prognostic values. Here, for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, we show a classification of colorectal cancer tumors from Saudi Arabian patients based on the gene expression profile. An existing method of colorectal cancer subtyping has been applied to the gene expression profile of tumors from Saudi colorectal cancer patients. A survival analysis was done on the predicted colorectal cancer subtypes. In silico functional analyses were conducted on the gene signature used for the subtype prediction. The predicted subtypes showed a distinct but statistically insignificant overall survival distribution (log-rank test, P = 0.069). A comparison of the predicted subtypes in Saudi colorectal cancer patients with that of French patients showed significant dissimilarity in the two populations (Chi-square test, P = 0.0091). Functional analyses of the gene signatures used for subtyping suggest their association with “cancer” and “gastrointestinal diseases.” Most of the signature genes were found differentially expressed in colorectal cancer tumors compared to adjacent normal tissues. This classification framework might facilitate the treatment of colorectal cancer patients.

Impact statement

Colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease and subtyping could be useful in implementing precision medicine approach. In this report, we identified molecular subtypes in relatively less studied CRC patients from Saudi Arabia using the prediction model developed on the French population. The predicted subtypes showed distinct overall survival among the six subtypes. Chi-square results exhibited the dissimilarity between French and Saudi colorectal cancer patient population in terms of subtype distribution ( P value = 0.0091). Gene signature (57 genes) used for subtyping was found to be functionally relevant as evident from the pathway analyses. These genes were found to be associated with gastrointestinal disease and cancer. Genes used for subtyping were found to be differentially expressed in Saudi colorectal cancer patient samples when compared with their own normal tissue. Taken together, this study supports a classification method for CRC patients by using patient samples from a different geographical region.

A practical guide to biomarkers for the evaluation of colorectal cancer

Evaluation of microsatellite instability (MSI) of every colorectal cancer (CRC) is important for prognostic and therapeutic purposes, while molecular testing helps identify actionable targeted therapy for patients with metastatic disease. This review will discuss the biomarkers commonly encountered in the clinical evaluation of CRC, and practical issues regarding MSI screening, reporting, interpretation, molecular test indication, and specimen requirements.

Influence of MSI and 18q LOH markers on capecitabine adjuvant monotherapy in colon cancer patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pretreatment analysis of selected molecular markers can be used for the prediction of disease-free survival (DFS)/overall survival (OS) of capecitabine adjuvant monotherapy in colon cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 126 patients enrolled in a capecitabine Phase IV clinical trial were analyzed for microsatellite instability (MSI), 18q loss of heterozygosity (LOH), thymidylate synthase (TYMS) 5' variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR), and methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T variants. The significance in predicting 5-year DFS/OS was assessed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

The MSI-high (MSI-H) genotype was significantly associated with DFS (HR 0.205, 95% CI 0.05-0.88, P=0.033) and OS (HR 0.208, 95% CI 0.05-0.89, P=0.035) compared to the microsatellite stable genotype. In models stratified according to clinicopathologic characteristics, the MSI-H genotype remained a positive predictive factor for DFS/OS only in patients with stage III (P=0.023) and patients with tumors localized proximally to the splenic flexure (P=0.004). Distal colon cancers with 18q LOH have a greater survival rate when treated with capecitabine than patients with stable tumors (81.3% vs 50.0%, HR for relapse 0.348, 95% CI 0.13-0.97, P=0.043). TYMS 5'VNTR and MTHFR C677T variants were not associated with DFS or OS.

CONCLUSION

MSI and 18q LOH markers have the potential to be utilized in the selection of colon cancer patients eligible for capecitabine adjuvant monotherapy.

The molecular characteristics of colorectal cancer: Implications for diagnosis and therapy

Colorectal cancer (CRC) results from the progressive accumulation of multiple genetic and epigenetic aberrations within cells. The progression from colorectal adenoma to carcinoma is caused by three major pathways: Microsatellite instability, chromosomal instability and CpG island methylator phenotype. A growing body of scientific evidences suggests that CRC is a heterogeneous disease, and genetic characteristics of the tumors determine their prognostic outcome and response to targeted therapies. Early diagnosis and effective targeted therapies based on a current knowledge of the molecular characteristics of CRC are essential to the successful treatment of CRC. Therefore, the present review summarized the current understanding of the molecular characteristics of CRC, and discussed its implications for diagnosis and targeted therapy.

Outcome of Mismatch Repair-Deficient Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Mayo Clinic Experience

BACKGROUND

Deficiencies in the DNA mismatch repair system cause errors during DNA replication, which in turn give rise to microsatellite instability (MSI). The impact of MSI on survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is unclear. This cohort study aims to investigate the prognostic and predictive value of MSI in mCRC prior to the immune therapy era.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 75 MSI-high (MSI-H) mCRC patients (pts) and 75 matched (age, gender, disease sidedness, metachronous/synchronous) microsatellite-stable (MSS) mCRC pts were identified from 1,268 mCRC pts who had MSI/mismatch repair test results at Mayo Clinic Rochester between January 1992 and July 2016. A retrospective review was conducted by using data from electronic medical records. Statistical analyses utilized the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

The MSS group was well matched to the MSI-H group based on age, gender, location, and chronicity of metastatic disease. MSI-H mCRC pts had earlier disease recurrence (median time from initial diagnosis to metastatic disease diagnosis, MSI-H group 12.9 vs. MSS group 20.9 months, p = .034). Median overall survival (OS) was 28.1 and 37.4 months for MSI-H and MSS pts, respectively (p = .99). In total, 94.7% of MSI-H pts and 98.7% of MSS pts had fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for metastatic disease, and there was no difference in OS between these two groups (32.3 vs. 37.4 months, p = .91). Forty-three MSI-H and thirty-nine MSS pts had metastasectomy and/or ablation of metastases (p = .51) with longer median OS compared with pts without metastasectomy (MSI-H: 82.0 vs. 13.9, p < .001; MSS: 69.9 vs. 19.7, p < .001). Age <65 years, BRAF wild type, and metastasectomy were associated with better OS in univariate analysis. Only metastasectomy remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

In mCRC, patients with MSI-H tumors have similar, but numerically shorter, median overall survival compared with those with MSS tumors. In both groups, metastasectomy and ablation of metastatic disease should be considered to optimize OS.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study clearly demonstrated the survival benefits that aggressive metastasectomy provides in selected microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer patients. This could be meaningful practice-changing information that has been long awaited.

DNA mismatch repair in cancer

Microsatellite instability (MSI) refers to the hypermutator phenotype secondary to frequent polymorphism in short repetitive DNA sequences and single nucleotide substitution, as consequence of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency. MSI secondary to germline mutation in DNA MMR proteins is the molecular fingerprint of Lynch syndrome (LS), while epigenetic inactivation of these genes is more commonly found in sporadic MSI tumors. MSI occurs at different frequencies across malignancies, although original methods to assess MSI or MMR deficiency have been developed mostly in LS related cancers. Here we will discuss the current methods to detect MSI/MMR deficiency with a focus of new tools which are emerging as highly sensitive detector for MSI across multiple tumor types. Due to high frequencies of non-synonymous mutations, the presence of frameshift-mutated neoantigens, which can trigger a more robust and long-lasting immune response and strong TIL infiltration with tumor eradication, MSI has emerged as an important predictor of sensitivity for immunotherapy-based strategies, as showed by the recent FDA's first histology agnostic-accelerated approval to immune checkpoint inhibitors for refractory, adult and pediatric, MMR deficient (dMMR) or MSI high (MSI-H) tumors. Moreover, it is known that MSI status may predict cancer response/resistance to certain chemotherapies. Here we will describe the complex interplay between the genetic and clinical-pathological features of MSI/dMMR tumors and the cancer immunotherapy, with a focus on the predictive and prognostic role of MMR status for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and providing some suggestions on how to conceive better predictive markers for immunotherapy in the next future.

Clinical Aspects of Microsatellite Instability Testing in Colorectal Cancer

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a molecular hallmark for some colorectal cancers (CRCs) in which short tandem repeats are prone to mutations along with DNA sequences. It is due to DNA-mismatch-repair system deficiency because of a germline/somatic mutation in mismatch-repair (MMR) genes. The germline mutations lead to Lynch syndrome (LS) while epigenetic gene silencing results in sporadic CRC tumors. We discuss in our paper the most important clinical aspects of MSI testing in CRCs. We reviewed the most reliable relevant studies and clinical trials according to their high-quality methods, particularly within two recent decades. MSI testing is used to classify CRC tumors as MSI-high (MSI-H), MSI-low, and microsatellite stable tumors. MSI-H or MMR deficient tumors have shown the best prognosis among all CRCs, so MSI testing is considered as a good prognostic marker. Moreover, it is used to identify LS among familial CRC patients. There is a diagnostic mutation in BRAF gene (V600E) by which sporadic CRCs could be distinguished from LS associated CRCs, due to its concordance with sporadic CRCs not LS. Although, some previous studies had demonstrated a predictive role for MSI testing in chemotherapy process, emerging some controversial findings in recent studies has not convinced many authors to recommend it as a routine examination to evaluate therapeutic response. Though emerging new molecular findings have opened novel windows to develop clinical management of CRC, MSI testing has remained as an excellent prognostic and diagnostic tool for CRC tumors.

5-Fluorouracil targets histone acetyltransferases p300/CBP in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Although 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is known to interfere with the synthesis of ribonucleic acid and deoxyribonucleic acid, the mechanism underlying its therapeutic efficacy in colorectal cancer (CRC) has not been fully elucidated. We aimed to investigate the influence of 5-FU on histone acetylation, a well-established anti-cancer target, to reveal novel pharmacological effects of 5-FU and their significance for CRC therapy. Results demonstrated that 5-FU induces global histone de-acetylation in multiple CRC cell lines. We identified that 5-FU reduces the binding ability of histone acetyltransferases p300 and CBP to chromatin, and induces their degradation through lysosome. Further work revealed that the degradation of p300/CBP induced by 5-FU was dependent on chaperone-mediated autophagy, mediated by heat-shock cognate protein 70 kDa (hsc70) and lysosomal-associated membrane protein 2A (LAMP2A). Moreover, the degradation of p300/CBP is relevant to cellular resistance to 5-FU, since blocking the degradation enhances 5-FU's cytotoxicity in CRC cells. From clinical data, we demonstrated that low expression of p300/CBP in CRC tissue was closely associated with poor clinical response to 5-FU based-chemotherapy, based on the analysis of 262 colorectal samples from the patients receiving 5-FU treatment: compared to cases with high expression of p300/CBP, those with low expression had lower long-term disease-free survival rate and increased early-progression. These results elucidate a novel pharmacological effect of 5-FU involving global histone de-acetylation by promoting the degradation of p300/CBP, and highlights p300 and CBP as promising predictors of chemo-sensitivity to 5-FU treatment.

Comparison of 627 patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer in China: Differences in clinicopathology, recurrence, and survival

Objective

Recent studies have reported increased mortality for right-sided colon cancers; however, the results are conflicting for different stage tumors. We examined the differences in clinicopathology between right- and left-sided colon cancers and the relationships between colon cancer location (right- and left-side) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Methods

We identified patients from 2005 to 2008 with stage II/III colon cancer who underwent surgery for curative intent. We explored the impact of the tumor location on the postoperative DFS and OS using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Of 627 patients, 50.6% (317/627) had right-sided colon cancer. These patients were more likely to have weight loss, second primary tumor, elevated preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), increased incidence of non-adenocarcinoma, more poorly differentiated tumors, vascular invasion, defective mismatch repair, and a lighter smoking history (P < 0.05). Right-sided colon cancer had a higher recurrence incidence compared with left-sided cancer (30.6% vs. 23.2%, P = 0.037), particularly with multiple metastatic sites in the first recurrence (17.5% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.020). Kaplan–Meier survival curves demonstrated a significant difference in the 5-year DFS rate between right- and left-sided cancers across all stages (68.1% vs. 75.2%, P = 0.043). However, there was no significant difference in the 5-year OS rate between the two groups (73.8% vs. 79.0%, P = 0.103). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with left-sided colon cancer had a significantly better 5-year DFS and OS rates compared with those with right-sided disease at stage III (64.3% vs. 46.8%, P = 0.002; 69.5% vs. 53.5%, P = 0.006, respectively); there were no significant differences in the 5-year DFS and OS rates at stage II (85.2% vs. 85.9%, P = 0.819; 89.8% vs. 88.5%, P = 0.803, respectively). Adjusted Cox regression analysis showed no significant differences in the 5-year OS and DFS rates for stage II [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.203, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.605–2.391, P = 0.598; HR = 0.980, 95% CI: 0.542–1.774, P = 0.948, respectively] or all stages combined (HR = 0.867, 95% CI: 0.613–1.227, P = 0.421; HR = 0.832, 95% CI: 0.606–1.142, P = 0.255, respectively). However, stage III left-sided cancer had higher 5-year OS and DFS rates (HR = 0.626, 95% CI: 0.414–0.948, P = 0.027; HR = 0.630, 95% CI: 0.428–0.926, P = 0.019, respectively).

Conclusion

We found that right- and left-sided colon cancers had significantly different clinicopathological characteristics. Right-sided colon cancer had a higher incidence of recurrence than left-sided disease. Patients with stage III right-sided colon cancer had a worse prognosis compared with those with stage III left-sided colon cancer.

Epigenetic Homogeneity Within Colorectal Tumors Predicts Shorter Relapse-Free and Overall Survival Times for Patients With Locoregional Cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There are few validated biomarkers that can be used to predict outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer. Part of the challenge is the genetic and molecular heterogeneity of colorectal tumors not only among patients, but also within tumors. We have explored intratumor heterogeneity at the epigenetic level, due to its dynamic nature. We analyzed DNA methylation profiles of the digestive tract surface and the central bulk and invasive front regions of colorectal tumors.

METHODS

We determined the DNA methylation profiles of >450,000 CpG sites in 3 macrodissected regions of 79 colorectal tumors and 23 associated liver metastases, obtained from 2 hospitals in Spain. We also analyzed samples for KRAS and BRAF mutations, 499,170 single nucleotide polymorphisms, and performed immunohistochemical analyses.

RESULTS

We observed differences in DNA methylation among the 3 tumor sections; regions of tumor-host interface differed the most from the other tumor sections. Interestingly, tumor samples collected from areas closer to the gastrointestinal transit most frequently shared methylation events with metastases. When we calculated individual coefficients to quantify heterogeneity, we found that epigenetic homogeneity was significantly associated with short time of relapse-free survival (log-rank P = .037) and short time of overall survival (log-rank P = .026) in patients with locoregional colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

In an analysis of 79 colorectal tumors, we found significant heterogeneity in patterns of DNA methylation within each tumor; the level of heterogeneity correlates with times of relapse-free and overall survival.

The evolving role of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: A review

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a molecular marker of a deficient mismatch repair (MMR) system and occurs in approximately 15% of colorectal cancers (CRCs), more frequently in early than late-stage of disease. While in sporadic cases (about two-thirds of MSI-H CRCs) MMR deficiency is caused by an epigenetic inactivation of MLH1 gene, the remainder are associated with Lynch syndrome, that is linked to a germ-line mutation of one of the MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2). MSI-H colorectal cancers have distinct clinical and pathological features such as proximal location, early-stage (predominantly stage II), poor differentiation, mucinous histology and association with BRAF mutations. In early-stage CRC, MSI can select a group of tumors with a better prognosis, while in metastatic disease it seems to confer a negative prognosis. Although with conflicting results, a large amount of preclinical and clinical evidence suggests a possible resistance to 5-FU in these tumors. The higher mutational load in MSI-H CRC can elicit an endogenous immune anti-tumor response, counterbalanced by the expression of immune inhibitory signals, such as PD-1 or PD-L1, that resist tumor elimination. Based on these considerations, MSI-H CRCs seem to be particularly responsive to immunotherapy, such as anti-PD-1, opening a new era in the treatment landscape for patients with metastatic CRC.

CRC-113 gene expression signature for predicting prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of global cancer mortality. Recent studies have proposed several gene signatures to predict CRC prognosis, but none of those have proven reliable for predicting prognosis in clinical practice yet due to poor reproducibility and molecular heterogeneity. Here, we have established a prognostic signature of 113 probe sets (CRC-113) that include potential biomarkers and reflect the biological and clinical characteristics. Robustness and accuracy were significantly validated in external data sets from 19 centers in five countries. In multivariate analysis, CRC-113 gene signature showed a stronger prognostic value for survival and disease recurrence in CRC patients than current clinicopathological risk factors and molecular alterations. We also demonstrated that the CRC-113 gene signature reflected both genetic and epigenetic molecular heterogeneity in CRC patients. Furthermore, incorporation of the CRC-113 gene signature into a clinical context and molecular markers further refined the selection of the CRC patients who might benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. Conclusively, CRC-113 gene signature provides new possibilities for improving prognostic models and personalized therapeutic strategies.

Cancer pharmacogenomics, challenges in implementation, and patient-focused perspectives

Cancer pharmacogenomics is an evolving landscape and has the potential to significantly impact cancer care and precision medicine. Harnessing and understanding the genetic code of both the patient (germline) and the tumor (somatic) provides the opportunity for personalized dose and therapy selection for cancer patients. While germline DNA is useful in understanding the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic disposition of a drug, somatic DNA is particularly useful in identifying drug targets and predicting drug response. Molecular profiling of somatic DNA has resulted in the current breadth of targeted therapies available, expanding the armamentarium to battle cancer. This review provides an update on cancer pharmacogenomics and genomics-based medicine, challenges in applying pharmacogenomics to the clinical setting, and patient perspectives on the use of pharmacogenomics to personalize cancer therapy.

Established and Potential Predictive Biomarkers in Gastrointestinal Cancer--c-Kit, Her2, Ras and Beyond

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal cancers are among the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. In different tumor types, personalized systemic treatment strategies based upon biomarker-selection were established over the last years. Although there is a flood of targeted agents in clinical development, only a few targeted agents with a predictive biomarker could be established for the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal cancer patients so far.

SUMMARY

Currently, predictive biomarkers for gastrointestinal cancers include Her2 overexpression or amplification (gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma), c-Kit overexpression (gastrointestinal stromal tumors) and RAS wild-type (colorectal cancer). Selection of patients based on these biomarkers allows the efficient use of targeted agents. The presence of a BRAF mutation and/or high microsatellite instability is prognostic and rather a predictive marker in CRC. Promising candidate markers in advanced clinical development are MET amplification in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, Met overexpression and high AFP serum levels in hepatocellular carcinoma.

KEY MESSAGE

Biomarker-guided systemic treatment is established in a subset of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Ongoing clinical trials and further advances in high-throughput technologies will hopefully result in more personalized systemic treatment strategies for these patients in the near future.

WITHDRAWN: Molecular classification of colorectal cancer: Current perspectives and controversies

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the editor. The authors have plagiarized part of a paper that had already appeared in ASCO EDUCATIONAL BOOK (2014), 91-99 (http://meetinglibrary.asco.org/content/114000091-144). One of the conditions of submission of a paper for publication is that authors declare explicitly that their work is original and has not appeared in a publication elsewhere. Re-use of any data should be appropriately cited. As such this article represents an abuse of the scientific publishing system. The scientific community takes a very strong view on this matter and apologies are offered to readers of the journal that this was not detected during the submission process. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy. This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy).

Survival patterns in teenagers and young adults with cancer in the United Kingdom: Comparisons with younger and older age groups

AIMS

We aimed to describe and compare survival in teenagers and young adults (TYAs) with cancer to that of younger children and older adults, to identify sub-populations at greater or lesser risk of death.

METHODS

We compared survival in cancer patients diagnosed in the United Kingdom aged 13-24 years (TYAs) to those aged 0-12 (children) and 25-49 years (adults) using the National Cancer Data Repository. All cases had a first cancer diagnosis between 1st January 2001 and 31st December 2005 with censor date 31st December 2010 or death if earlier.

RESULTS

We found six distinct statistically significant survival patterns. In pattern 1, the younger the age-group the better the 1- and 5-year survival (acute lymphoid leukaemia, carcinoma of ovary and melanoma). In pattern 2, TYAs had a worse 5-year survival than both children and young adults (bone and soft tissues sarcomas). In pattern 3, TYAs had a worse 1-year survival but no difference at 5-years (carcinoma of cervix and female breast). In pattern 4, TYAs had better 1-year survival than adults, but no difference at 5 years (carcinoma of liver and intrahepatic bile ducts, germ cell tumours of extra-gonadal sites). In pattern 5, the younger the age-group the better the 5-year survival, but the difference developed after 1-year (acute myeloid leukaemia, carcinoma of colon and rectum). In pattern 6, there was no difference in 1- and 5-year survival between TYAs and adults (testicular germ cell tumours, ovarian germ cell tumours and carcinoma of thyroid).

CONCLUSION

TYAs with specific cancer diagnoses can be grouped according to 1- and 5-year survival patterns compared to children and young adults. To further improve survival for TYAs, age-specific biology, pharmacology, proteomics, genomics, clinician and patient behaviour studies embedded within clinical trials are required.

Diagnosis and management of DNA mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer

Colorectal tumors exhibiting defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR-D)/microsatellite instability (MSI-H) form a distinct subgroup of CRCs associated with important clinical and pathologic features. The identification of MMR-D/MSI-H may impact CRC prognosis, prediction of response to chemotherapeutic agents, and may necessitate the need for genetic assessment for Lynch syndrome. Oncologists remain at the forefront of diagnosing, treating, and managing patients with MMR-D/MSI-H CRC and ensuring that the clinical care of these patients reflect our evolving understanding of this unique CRC subtype.

A molecular signature for the prediction of recurrence in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Several clinical and pathological factors have an impact on the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC), but they are not yet adequate for risk assessment. We aimed to identify a molecular signature that can reliably identify CRC patients at high risk for recurrence.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-one CRC samples (stage II/III) were included in this study. A two-step gene expression profiling study was conducted. First, gene expression measurements from 81 fresh frozen CRC samples were obtained using Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Arrays. Second, a focused gene expression assay, including prognostic genes and genes of interest from literature reviews, was performed using 200 fresh frozen samples and a Taqman low-density array (TLDA) analysis. An optimal 31-gene expression classifier for the prediction of recurrence among patients with stage II/III CRC was developed using logistic regression analysis. This gene expression signature classified 58.5% of patients as low-risk and 41.5% as high-risk (P < 0.001). The signature was the strongest independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis. The five-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates for the low-risk patients and the high-risk patients were 88.5% and 41.3% (P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

We identified a 31-gene expression signature that is closely associated with the clinical outcome of stage II/III CRC patients.

Applying public health screening criteria: how does universal newborn screening compare to universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome in adults with colorectal cancer?

Institutions have increasingly begun to adopt universal tumor screening (UTS) programs whereby tumors from all newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are screened to identify who should be offered germline testing for Lynch syndrome (the most common cause of hereditary CRC). Given limited information about the impact of universal screening programs to detect hereditary disease in adults, we apply criteria used to evaluate public health screening programs and compare and contrast UTS with universal newborn screening (NBS) for the purpose of examining ethical implications and anticipating potential outcomes of UTS. Both UTS and a core set of NBS conditions clearly meet most of the Wilson and Jungner screening criteria. However, many state NBS panels include additional conditions that do not meet several of these criteria, and there is currently insufficient data to confirm that UTS meets some of these criteria. Comparing UTS and NBS with regard to newer screening criteria raises additional issues that require attention for both UTS and NBS. Comparisons also highlight the importance of evaluating the implementation of genomic tests to ensure or improve their effectiveness at reducing morbidity and mortality while minimizing potential harms.

Prognostic and predictive significance of MSI in stages II/III colon cancer

In colon cancer, classic disease staging remains the key prognosis and treatment determinant. Although adjuvant chemotherapy has an established role in stage III colon cancer patients, in stage II it is still a subject of controversy due to its restriction to a small subgroup of patients with high-risk histopathologic features. Patients with stage II tumors form a highly heterogeneous group, with five-year relative overall survival rates ranging from 87.5% (IIA) to 58.4% (IIC). Identifying those for whom adjuvant chemotherapy would be appropriate and necessary has been challenging, and prognostic markers which could serve in the selection of patients more likely to recur or benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy are eagerly needed. The stronger candidate in this category seems to be microsatellite instability (MSI). The recently reported European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines suggest that MSI should be evaluated in stage II colorectal cancer patients in order to contribute in treatment decision-making regarding chemotherapy administration. The hypothetical predictive role of MSI regarding its response to 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy has proven a much more difficult issue to address. Almost every possible relation between MSI and chemotherapy outcome has been described in the adjuvant colon cancer setting in the international literature, and the matter is far from being settled. In this current report we critically evaluate the prognostic and predictive impact of MSI status in patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer patients.

Multicenter retrospective analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) with high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H)

BACKGROUND

The microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) phenotype, present in 15% of early colorectal cancer (CRC), confers good prognosis. MSI-H metastatic CRC is rare and its impact on outcomes is unknown. We describe survival outcomes and the impact of chemotherapy, metastatectomy, and BRAF V600E mutation status in the largest reported cohort of MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 55 MSI-H metastatic CRC patients from two institutions, Royal Melbourne Hospital (Australia) and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (United States), was conducted. Statistical analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Median age was 67 years (20-90), 58% had poor differentiation, and 45% had stage IV disease at presentation. Median overall survival (OS) from metastatic disease was 15.4 months. Thirteen patients underwent R0/R1 metastatectomies, with median OS from metastatectomy 33.8 months. Thirty-one patients received first-line systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease with median OS from the start of chemotherapy 11.5 months. No statistically significant difference in progression-free survival or OS was seen between fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, or irinotecan based chemotherapy. BRAF V600E mutation was present in 14 of 47 patients (30%). BRAF V600E patients demonstrated significantly worse median OS; 10.1 versus 17.3 months, P = 0.03. In multivariate analyses, BRAF V600E mutants had worse OS (HR 4.04; P = 0.005), while patients undergoing metastatectomy (HR 0.11; P = <0.001) and patients who initially presented as stage IV disease had improved OS (HR 0.27; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MSI-H metastatic CRC do not appear to have improved outcomes. BRAF V600E mutation is a poor prognostic factor in MSI-H metastatic CRC.

CHFR silencing or microsatellite instability is associated with increased antitumor activity of docetaxel or gemcitabine in colorectal cancer

Phenotypic differences among cancers with the same origin may be associated with chemotherapy response. CHFR silencing associated with DNA methylation has been suggested to be predictive of taxane sensitivity in diverse tumor types. However, the use of microsatellite instability (MSI:unstable-MSS:stable) as a predictive marker for therapeutic effect has had conflicting results. We examined these molecular alterations as predictors of chemotherapy sensitivity in colorectal cancer (CRC). Differential sensitivity to docetaxel and gemcitabine was compared to potential predictive biomarkers CHFR methylation and MSI status. Cell lines that were MSI-H/CHFR-methylated, MSS/CHFR-methylated and MSS/CHFR-unmethylated were assessed for in vivo sensitivity of CRC cell line xenografts to docetaxel and/or gemcitabine. We observed increased sensitivity in vitro to gemcitabine in cell lines with MSI and docetaxel in cell lines with CHFR inactivation via DNA methylation. In vivo treatment of human xenografts confirmed differential sensitivity, with the MSI-H/CHFR-methylated line RKO having tumor growth inhibition to each agent, and at least additive tumor growth inhibition with combination therapy. The MSS-CHFR-unmethylated line, CACO2 , was resistant to single and combination therapy, while COLO205, the MSS/CHFR-methylated line, showed tumor growth inhibition with docetaxel, but not gemcitabine, therapy. CHFR methylation in CRC cell lines predicted for sensitivity in vitro and in vivo to docetaxel, while MSI-H cell lines were more sensitive to gemcitabine. These data suggest that a subset of CRC patients would be selectively sensitive to a novel combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel, and are the basis for an ongoing clinical trial of this combination in a biomarker-selected patient population.

Gene expression patterns unveil a new level of molecular heterogeneity in colorectal cancer

The recognition that colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease in terms of clinical behaviour and response to therapy translates into an urgent need for robust molecular disease subclassifiers that can explain this heterogeneity beyond current parameters (MSI, KRAS, BRAF). Attempts to fill this gap are emerging. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TGCA) reported two main CRC groups, based on the incidence and spectrum of mutated genes, and another paper reported an EMT expression signature defined subgroup. We performed a prior free analysis of CRC heterogeneity on 1113 CRC gene expression profiles and confronted our findings to established molecular determinants and clinical, histopathological and survival data. Unsupervised clustering based on gene modules allowed us to distinguish at least five different gene expression CRC subtypes, which we call surface crypt-like, lower crypt-like, CIMP-H-like, mesenchymal and mixed. A gene set enrichment analysis combined with literature search of gene module members identified distinct biological motifs in different subtypes. The subtypes, which were not derived based on outcome, nonetheless showed differences in prognosis. Known gene copy number variations and mutations in key cancer-associated genes differed between subtypes, but the subtypes provided molecular information beyond that contained in these variables. Morphological features significantly differed between subtypes. The objective existence of the subtypes and their clinical and molecular characteristics were validated in an independent set of 720 CRC expression profiles. Our subtypes provide a novel perspective on the heterogeneity of CRC. The proposed subtypes should be further explored retrospectively on existing clinical trial datasets and, when sufficiently robust, be prospectively assessed for clinical relevance in terms of prognosis and treatment response predictive capacity. Original microarray data were uploaded to the ArrayExpress database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/) under Accession Nos E-MTAB-990 and E-MTAB-1026.

Molecular profiling for stage II colon cancer

SUMMARY Although nearly 80% of patients with stage II colon cancer are cured by surgery alone, 20% will relapse. One major challenge is to identify individuals who will derive enough benefit from adjuvant therapy to balance the risks, costs and inconvenience. Existing markers, such as microsatellite instability, are predictive and prognostic, but only apply to a small number of patients. Novel technologies that include molecular profiling are emerging tools that may help to identify patients at high risk for recurrence or predict who will derive a greater benefit from adjuvant treatment. This article reviews molecular markers in stage II colon cancer and their potential role in identification of high-risk patients.

Guidelines for biomarker testing in colorectal carcinoma (CRC): a national consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM)

This consensus statement, conceived as a joint initiative of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology, makes diagnostic and treatment recommendations for the management of patients with hereditary, localised and advanced CRC based on the current scientific evidence on biomarker use. This consensus statement thus provides an opportunity to improve healthcare efficiency and resource use, which will benefit these patients. Based on the currently available data on this subject, this expert group recommends testing for microsatellite instability (MSI) in patients with localised CRC, as this is a strong predictive factor for deciding on adjuvant treatment. However, although the ColoPrint(®) and Oncotype Dx(®) gene expression signatures have been shown to have prognostic value, no consensus yet exists concerning their use in clinical practice. For advanced CRC, it is essential to test for KRAS mutation status before administering an anti-EGFR treatment, such as cetuximab or panitumumab. However, testing for other biomarkers, such as BRAF, EGFR, PI3K and PTEN mutations, should not be done routinely, because this does not influence treatment planning at the present time. Other important issues addressed include organisational requirements and the quality controls needed for proper testing of these biomarkers as well as the legal implications to be borne in mind when testing some biomarkers.

DNA damage repair pathways in cancer stem cells

The discovery of tumor-initiating cells endowed with stem-like features has added a further level of complexity to the pathobiology of neoplastic diseases. In the attempt of dissecting the functional properties of this uncommon cellular subpopulation, investigators are taking full advantage of a body of knowledge about adult stem cells, as the "cancer stem cell model" implies that tissue-resident stem cells are the target of the oncogenic process. It is emerging that a plethora of molecular mechanisms protect cancer stem cells (CSC) against chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced death stimuli. The ability of CSCs to survive stressful conditions is correlated, among others, with a multifaceted protection of genome integrity by a prompt activation of the DNA damage sensor and repair machinery. Nevertheless, many molecular-targeted agents directed against DNA repair effectors are in late preclinical or clinical development while the identification of predictive biomarkers of response coupled with the validation of robust assays for assessing biomarkers is paving the way for biology-driven clinical trials.