1
|
Riaz N, Jeen T, Whelan TJ, Nielsen TO. Recent Advances in Optimizing Radiation Therapy Decisions in Early Invasive Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:1260. [PMID: 36831598 PMCID: PMC9954587 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery is a well-established treatment standard for early invasive breast cancer. Screening, early diagnosis, refinement in surgical techniques, the knowledge of new and specific molecular prognostic factors, and now the standard use of more effective neo/adjuvant systemic therapies have proven instrumental in reducing the rates of locoregional relapses. This underscores the need for reliably identifying women with such low-risk disease burdens in whom elimination of radiation from the treatment plan would not compromise oncological safety. This review summarizes the current evidence for radiation de-intensification strategies and details ongoing prospective clinical trials investigating the omission of adjuvant whole breast irradiation in molecularly defined low-risk breast cancers and related evidence supporting the potential for radiation de-escalation in HER2+ and triple-negative clinical subtypes. Furthermore, we discuss the current evidence for the de-escalation of regional nodal irradiation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Finally, we also detail the current knowledge of the clinical value of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and liquid-based biomarkers as prognostic factors for locoregional relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazia Riaz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Tiffany Jeen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Timothy J. Whelan
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Torsten O. Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abrahão R, Alvarez EM, Waters AR, Romero CC, Gosdin MM, Naz H, Pollock BH, Kirchhoff AC, Keegan THM. A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to adolescents and young adults' participation in cancer clinical trials: Oncologist and patient perspectives. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29479. [PMID: 34913583 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite efforts to increase participation of adolescents and young adults (AYAs; 15-39 years) in cancer clinical trials (CTs), enrollment remains very low. Even when provided access to CTs, AYAs are less likely to participate than children and older adults. A better understanding of oncologist- and AYA survivor-reported barriers, facilitators, and potential areas for CT enrollment improvement is needed. PROCEDURES From December 2019 to August 2020, we conducted 43 semi-structured interviews with oncologists (n = 17) and AYA cancer survivors (n = 26) who were offered and/or participated in CTs at cancer centers in California and Utah. Thematic analyses were used to interpret the findings. RESULTS Oncologists identified a lack of available CTs, strict eligibility criteria, lack of awareness of open CTs, and poor communication between pediatric and adult oncologists as major barriers to enrollment. AYA cancer survivors identified financial and psychosocial barriers, and a poor understanding of what a CT means and its potential benefits as barriers to enrollment. Areas for improvement identified by oncologists and AYAs include educational, financial, and psychosocial support to AYAs. Oncologists also emphasized the need to increase CT availability, improve awareness of open CTs, and better communication between both pediatric and adult oncologists and oncologists and AYAs. CONCLUSIONS For AYAs with cancer, a lack of CT eligibility and physician awareness of open CTs likely factor into their lower CT enrollment. Potential strategies to improve AYA enrollment in CTs require comprehensive collaboration between pediatric and adult institutions, as well as educational, psychosocial, and financial support to AYAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renata Abrahão
- Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training (COHORT), Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.,Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Elysia M Alvarez
- Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training (COHORT), Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Austin R Waters
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Crystal C Romero
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Melissa M Gosdin
- Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Hiba Naz
- Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Brad H Pollock
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Anne C Kirchhoff
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Theresa H M Keegan
- Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training (COHORT), Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chi MS, Ko HL, Chen CC, Hsu CH, Chen LK, Cheng FTF. Single institute experience of intraoperative radiation therapy in early-stage breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e27842. [PMID: 34797318 PMCID: PMC8601266 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000027842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is an alternative to whole breast irradiation in selected early-stage breast cancer patients. In this single institute analysis, we report the preliminary results of IORT given by Axxent Electronic Brachytherapy (eBT) system.Patients treated with lumpectomy and eBT within a minimum follow-up period of 12 months were analyzed. Eligible criteria include being over the age of 45, having unifocal invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) or ductal carcinoma in situ <3 cm in diameter, not exhibiting lymph node involvement on preoperative images, and negative sentinel lymph node biopsy. The eBT was given by preloaded radiation plans to deliver a single fraction of 20 Gray (Gy) right after lumpectomy.From January 2016 to April 2019, a total of 103 patients were collected. There were 78 patients with IDC and 25 with ductal carcinoma in situ. At a mean follow-up time of 31.1 months (range, 14.5-54.0 months), the local control rate was 98.1%. Two IDC patients had tumor recurrences (1 local and 1 regional failure). Post-IORT radiotherapy was given to 4 patients. There were no cancer related deaths, no distant metastases, and treatment side effects greater than grade 3 documented.We report the largest single institute analysis using the eBT system in Taiwan. The low recurrence and complication rates at a 31.1 month follow-up time support the use of the eBT system in selected early-stage breast cancer patients.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Brachytherapy
- Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy
- Breast Neoplasms/surgery
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Mastectomy, Segmental
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
- Treatment Outcome
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mau-Shin Chi
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Ling Ko
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chang-Cheng Chen
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Hsien Hsu
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Liang-Kuang Chen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Fiona Tsui-Fen Cheng
- Department of General Surgery, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Differences in Time Burden across Local Therapy Strategies for Early-stage Breast Cancer. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3904. [PMID: 34745797 PMCID: PMC8568370 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
"Time burden" (time required during treatment) is relevant when choosing a local therapy option for early-stage breast cancer but has not been rigorously studied. We compared the time burden for three common local therapies for breast cancer: (1) lumpectomy plus whole-breast irradiation (Lump+WBI), (2) mastectomy without radiation or reconstruction (Mast alone), and (3) mastectomy without radiation but with reconstruction (Mast+Recon). Methods Using the MarketScan database, we identified 35,406 breast cancer patients treated from 2000 to 2011 with these local therapies. We quantified the total time burden as the sum of inpatient days (inpatient-days), outpatient days excluding radiation fractions (outpatient-days), and radiation fractions (radiation-days) in the first two years postdiagnosis. Multivariable regression evaluated the effect of local therapy on inpatient-days and outpatient-days adjusted for patient and treatment covariates. Results Adjusted mean number of inpatient-days was 1.0 for Lump+WBI, 2.0 for Mast alone, and 3.1 for Mast+Recon (P < 0.001). Adjusted mean number of outpatient-days was 42.9 for Lump+WBI, 42.2 for Mast alone, and 45.8 for Mast+Recon (P < 0.001). The mean number of radiation-days for Lump+WBI was 32.4. Compared with Mast+Recon (48.9 days), total adjusted time burden was 4.7 days shorter for Mast alone (44.2 days) and 27.4 days longer for Lump+WBI (76.3 days). However, use of a 15 fraction WBI regimen would reduce the time burden differential between Lump+WBI and Mast+Recon to just 10.0 days. Conclusions Although Mast+Recon confers the highest inpatient and outpatient time burden, Lump+WBI carries the highest total time burden. Increased use of hypofractionation will reduce the total time burden for Lump+WBI.
Collapse
|
5
|
White DP, Kurian AW, Stevens JL, Liu B, Brest AE, Petkov VI. Receipt of guideline-concordant care among young adult women with breast cancer. Cancer 2021; 127:3325-3333. [PMID: 34062616 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the real-world care of young adult (YA) females (aged 20-39 years) with breast cancer. This study describes factors associated with the receipt of guideline-concordant care (GCC) among YAs. METHODS The authors identified 1259 YA women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed in 2013 in the National Cancer Institute's Patterns of Care study. Hospital records were re-abstracted, and treatment was verified. Using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's 2013 breast cancer guidelines, the authors assessed the receipt of GCC by cancer subtype among a subset of YAs (n = 952). Associations between sociodemographic and clinical factors and GCC receipt were examined. RESULTS Most YAs were 35 to 39 years old (51.2%) and partnered (56.4%); half had hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) tumors. GCC was found for 81.7% of YAs. Relationships between sociodemographic and clinical factors and GCC receipt differed by subtype. Stage was the only significant predictor of GCC receipt for all subtypes (stage II vs III: odds ratio [OR] for HR+/HER2+, 0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-0.50; OR for HR-/HER2+, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.07-0.25; OR for HR-/HER2-, 3.86; 95% CI, 1.55-9.62; OR for HR+/HER2-, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.63-5.80). CONCLUSIONS GCC is high among YAs with breast cancer. The effects of sociodemographic factors and treatment facility size on GCC differ by subtype. Consistent with recommendations, tumor biology, not age, is associated with GCC for all subtypes. Future studies should assess the effect of GCC on survival among YAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dolly P White
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Allison W Kurian
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.,Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | - Benmei Liu
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ariel E Brest
- Information Management Services, Inc, Calverton, Maryland
| | - Valentina I Petkov
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pan IW, Yen TWF, Huo J, Chen C, Smith BD, Shih YCT. Choice of local therapy for young women with early-stage breast cancer who have young-aged children. Cancer 2020; 126:4761-4769. [PMID: 32757314 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision making regarding the initial treatment of women with breast cancer is complicated. In the current study, the authors examined the relationship between treatment choices and their children's ages among young women with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS Using the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database, the authors identified women aged 20 to 50 years who underwent lumpectomy or mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer between 2008 and 2014. Predictors of compliance with radiotherapy after undergoing lumpectomy and of undergoing mastectomy were determined using multinomial logistic regression. The authors conducted sensitivity analyses to explore the impact of the number of young-aged children and a reduction in the sample size in 2014 due to the attrition of health plans contributing to MarketScan. RESULTS A total of 21,052 women were included in the current analysis. Among women with at least 1 child aged <7 years, the adjusted rate of lumpectomy was 59.9%; approximately 22% of these women did not receive radiotherapy. Compared with women undergoing lumpectomy plus radiotherapy, women with at least 1 child aged <7 years or aged 7 to 12 years were 25% and 16%, respectively, more likely to undergo lumpectomy alone compared with women with no children aged <18 years (P = .002 and P = .012, respectively) and 64% and 37%, respectively, more likely to undergo mastectomy (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Among privately insured women with breast cancer, having young children was found to be strongly associated with the omission of postlumpectomy radiotherapy or undergoing mastectomy. Having >1 young-aged child further amplified these associations. The findings of the current study suggested that caring for young children may present unique challenges to young women with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I-Wen Pan
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tina W F Yen
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin
| | - Jinhai Huo
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Cheng Chen
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ya-Chen Tina Shih
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
White J, Thompson A, Whelan T. Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation and Intraoperative Partial Breast Irradiation: Reducing the Burden of Effective Breast Conservation. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2254-2262. [PMID: 32442062 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.00070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Julia White
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Alastair Thompson
- Section of Breast Surgery, Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Timothy Whelan
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University and Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vicini FA, Cecchini RS, White JR, Arthur DW, Julian TB, Rabinovitch RA, Kuske RR, Ganz PA, Parda DS, Scheier MF, Winter KA, Paik S, Kuerer HM, Vallow LA, Pierce LJ, Mamounas EP, McCormick B, Costantino JP, Bear HD, Germain I, Gustafson G, Grossheim L, Petersen IA, Hudes RS, Curran WJ, Bryant JL, Wolmark N. Long-term primary results of accelerated partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer: a randomised, phase 3, equivalence trial. Lancet 2019; 394:2155-2164. [PMID: 31813636 PMCID: PMC7199428 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32514-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 303] [Impact Index Per Article: 60.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Revised: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for patients with early-stage breast cancer decreases ipsilateral breast-tumour recurrence (IBTR), yielding comparable results to mastectomy. It is unknown whether accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) to only the tumour-bearing quadrant, which shortens treatment duration, is equally effective. In our trial, we investigated whether APBI provides equivalent local tumour control after lumpectomy compared with whole-breast irradiation. METHODS We did this randomised, phase 3, equivalence trial (NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413) in 154 clinical centres in the USA, Canada, Ireland, and Israel. Adult women (>18 years) with early-stage (0, I, or II; no evidence of distant metastases, but up to three axillary nodes could be positive) breast cancer (tumour size ≤3 cm; including all histologies and multifocal breast cancers), who had had lumpectomy with negative (ie, no detectable cancer cells) surgical margins, were randomly assigned (1:1) using a biased-coin-based minimisation algorithm to receive either whole-breast irradiation (whole-breast irradiation group) or APBI (APBI group). Whole-breast irradiation was delivered in 25 daily fractions of 50 Gy over 5 weeks, with or without a supplemental boost to the tumour bed, and APBI was delivered as 34 Gy of brachytherapy or 38·5 Gy of external bream radiation therapy in 10 fractions, over 5 treatment days within an 8-day period. Randomisation was stratified by disease stage, menopausal status, hormone-receptor status, and intention to receive chemotherapy. Patients, investigators, and statisticians could not be masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome of invasive and non-invasive IBTR as a first recurrence was analysed in the intention-to-treat population, excluding those patients who were lost to follow-up, with an equivalency test on the basis of a 50% margin increase in the hazard ratio (90% CI for the observed HR between 0·667 and 1·5 for equivalence) and a Cox proportional hazard model. Survival was assessed by intention to treat, and sensitivity analyses were done in the per-protocol population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00103181. FINDINGS Between March 21, 2005, and April 16, 2013, 4216 women were enrolled. 2109 were assigned to the whole-breast irradiation group and 2107 were assigned to the APBI group. 70 patients from the whole-breast irradiation group and 14 from the APBI group withdrew consent or were lost to follow-up at this stage, so 2039 and 2093 patients respectively were available for survival analysis. Further, three and four patients respectively were lost to clinical follow-up (ie, survival status was assessed by phone but no physical examination was done), leaving 2036 patients in the whole-breast irradiation group and 2089 in the APBI group evaluable for the primary outcome. At a median follow-up of 10·2 years (IQR 7·5-11·5), 90 (4%) of 2089 women eligible for the primary outcome in the APBI group and 71 (3%) of 2036 women in the whole-breast irradiation group had an IBTR (HR 1·22, 90% CI 0·94-1·58). The 10-year cumulative incidence of IBTR was 4·6% (95% CI 3·7-5·7) in the APBI group versus 3·9% (3·1-5·0) in the whole-breast irradiation group. 44 (2%) of 2039 patients in the whole-breast irradiation group and 49 (2%) of 2093 patients in the APBI group died from recurring breast cancer. There were no treatment-related deaths. Second cancers and treatment-related toxicities were similar between the two groups. 2020 patients in the whole-breast irradiation group and 2089 in APBI group had available data on adverse events. The highest toxicity grade reported was: grade 1 in 845 (40%), grade 2 in 921 (44%), and grade 3 in 201 (10%) patients in the APBI group, compared with grade 1 in 626 (31%), grade 2 in 1193 (59%), and grade 3 in 143 (7%) in the whole-breast irradiation group. INTERPRETATION APBI did not meet the criteria for equivalence to whole-breast irradiation in controlling IBTR for breast-conserving therapy. Our trial had broad eligibility criteria, leading to a large, heterogeneous pool of patients and sufficient power to detect treatment equivalence, but was not designed to test equivalence in patient subgroups or outcomes from different APBI techniques. For patients with early-stage breast cancer, our findings support whole-breast irradiation following lumpectomy; however, with an absolute difference of less than 1% in the 10-year cumulative incidence of IBTR, APBI might be an acceptable alternative for some women. FUNDING National Cancer Institute, US Department of Health and Human Services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank A Vicini
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; MHP Radiation Oncology Institute, St Joseph Mercy Hospital Campus, Pontiac, MI, USA.
| | - Reena S Cecchini
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Julia R White
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center-Arthur G James Cancer Hospital and Richard J Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Douglas W Arthur
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Thomas B Julian
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rachel A Rabinovitch
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Robert R Kuske
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Arizona Breast Cancer Specialists, Arizona Center for Cancer Care, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Patricia A Ganz
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - David S Parda
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Kathryn A Winter
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Soonmyung Paik
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Henry M Kuerer
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Lori J Pierce
- Southwest Oncology Group Cancer Research Network, Hope Foundation for Cancer Research, Portland, OR, USA; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Eleftherios P Mamounas
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Orlando Health, UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Beryl McCormick
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph P Costantino
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Harry D Bear
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Isabelle Germain
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Pavillon Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Gregory Gustafson
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Community Clinical Oncology Program, William Beaumont Hospital, Sterling Heights, MI, USA
| | - Linda Grossheim
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Summit Cancer Center, Post Falls, ID, USA
| | - Ivy A Petersen
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Richard S Hudes
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Saint Agnes Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; Thomas Jefferson University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Walter J Curran
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - John L Bryant
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Norman Wolmark
- NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Samarasinghe A, Chan A, Hastrich D, Martin R, Gan A, Abdulaziz F, Latham M, Zissiadis Y, Taylor M, Willsher P. Compliance with multidisciplinary team meeting management recommendations. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2019; 15:337-342. [PMID: 31507069 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to evaluate patient compliance with management recommendations given by a breast cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT), assess for reasons for noncompliance, and perform an exploratory assessment on breast cancer outcomes in noncompliant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was undertaken for patients selected by their primary clinician to be discussed at the MDT of Breast Cancer Research Centre-WA in Perth between 1st March 2011 and the 28th February 2016. The primary objective was the rate of compliance with MDT management recommendations. Secondary objectives included factors associated with noncompliance, rate of clinical trial uptake, and impact of treatment noncompliance on breast cancer events in a subgroup of early breast cancer (EBC) patients. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION A total of 2614 MDT management recommendations were made for 925 patients. Overall, 92% were compliant with all recommendations given. Clinical trial recruitment was successful in 84.1%. The reasons given for treatment noncompliance were fear of toxicity, choosing an alternative treatment, and treatment inconvenience. In a subset of 337 EBC patients, there was a significantly higher rate of contralateral breast cancer, distant recurrence, and breast cancer-specific death, P = .0016, in those who were noncompliant. Our study demonstrates a high rate of MDT treatment recommendation compliance and clinical trial recruitment. In a subgroup of EBC patients, noncompliance was associated with significantly worse outcomes. Attention to educating patients to minimize their fear of treatment toxicity and ensuring their understanding of evidence-based treatment may lead to lower rates of noncompliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amali Samarasinghe
- Medical, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Arlene Chan
- Medical Oncology, Breast Cancer Research Centre-WA, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Diana Hastrich
- Breast Surgery, Mount Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Richard Martin
- Breast Surgery, Mount Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Albert Gan
- Medcial Oncology, Mount Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Farah Abdulaziz
- Breast Surgery, St John of God Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Margaret Latham
- Radiation Oncology, Genesis Cancer Care, Wembley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Yvonne Zissiadis
- Radiation Oncology, Genesis Cancer Care, Wembley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Mandy Taylor
- Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Peter Willsher
- Breast Surgery, Breast Cancer Research Centre-WA, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pannier ST, Warner EL, Fowler B, Fair D, Salmon SK, Kirchhoff AC. Age-Specific Patient Navigation Preferences Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2019; 34:242-251. [PMID: 29170930 PMCID: PMC6719558 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1294-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient navigation is increasingly being directed at adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients. This study provides a novel description of differences in AYA cancer patients' preferences for navigation services by developmental age at diagnosis. METHODS Eligible patients were diagnosed with cancer between ages 15 and 39 and had completed at least 1 month of treatment. Between October 2015 and January 2016, patients completed semi-structured interviews about navigation preferences. Summary statistics of demographic and cancer characteristics were generated. Differences in patient navigation preferences were examined through qualitative analyses by developmental age at diagnosis. RESULTS AYAs were interviewed (adolescents 15-18 years N = 8; emerging adults 19-25 years N = 8; young adults 26-39 years N = 23). On average, participants were 4.5 years from diagnosis. All age groups were interested in face-to-face connection with a navigator and using multiple communication platforms (phone, text, email) to follow-up. Three of the most frequently cited needs were insurance, finances, and information. AYAs differed in support, healthcare, and resource preferences by developmental age; only adolescents preferred educational support. While all groups preferred financial and family support, the specific type of assistance (medical versus living expenses, partner/spouse, child, or parental assistance) varied by age group. CONCLUSIONS AYAs with cancer have different preferences for patient navigation by developmental age at diagnosis. AYAs are not a one-size-fits-all population, and navigation programs can better assist AYAs when services are targeted to appropriate developmental ages. Future research should examine fertility and navigation preferences by time since diagnosis. While some navigation needs to span the AYA age range, other needs are specific to developmental age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha T Pannier
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
| | - Echo L Warner
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- University of Utah, College of Nursing, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Brynn Fowler
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 4060, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Douglas Fair
- Primary Children's Hospital, 100 Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 100 N Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Sara K Salmon
- Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Cancer Learning Center, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Intermountain Healthcare, 5121 Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT, 84107, USA
| | - Anne C Kirchhoff
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 100 N Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Corica T, Saunders CM, Bulsara MK, Taylor M, Joseph DJ, Nowak AK. Patient preferences for adjuvant radiotherapy in early breast cancer are strongly influenced by treatment received through random assignment. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e12985. [PMID: 30637839 PMCID: PMC6590655 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Revised: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE TARGIT-A randomised women with early breast cancer to receive external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT-IORT). This study aimed to identify what extra risk of recurrence patients would accept for perceived benefits and risks of different radiotherapy treatments. METHODS Patient preferences were determined by self-rated trade-off questionnaires in two studies: Stage (1) 209 TARGIT-A participants (TARGIT-IORTn = 108, EBRTn = 101); Stage (2) 123 non-trial patients yet to receive radiotherapy (pre-treatment group), with 85 also surveyed post-radiotherapy. Patients traded-off risks of local recurrence in preference selection between TARGIT-IORT and EBRT. RESULTS TARGIT-IORT patients were more accepting of IORT than EBRT patients with 60% accepting the highest increased risk presented (4%-6%) compared to 12% of EBRT patients, and 2% not accepting IORT at all compared to 43% of EBRT patients. Pre-treatment patients were more accepting of IORT than post-treatment patients with 23% accepting the highest increased risk presented compared to 15% of post-treatment patients, and 15% not accepting IORT at all compared to 41% of pre-treatment patients. CONCLUSIONS Breast cancer patients yet to receive radiotherapy accept a higher recurrence risk than the actual risk found in TARGIT-A. Measured patient preferences are highly influenced by experience of treatment received. This finding challenges the validity of post-treatment preference studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tammy Corica
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Radiation Oncology Clinical Trials and Research Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Christobel M Saunders
- School of Medicine, Division of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Max K Bulsara
- Institute for Health Research, University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Mandy Taylor
- Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - David J Joseph
- School of Medicine, Division of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Anna K Nowak
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Trials and Research Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guidolin K, Lock M, Vogt K, McClure JA, Winick-Ng J, Vinden C, Brackstone M. Appropriate treatment receipt after breast-conserving surgery. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 25:e545-e552. [PMID: 30607122 DOI: 10.3747/co.25.4117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Breast-conserving surgery (bcs) and radiation therapy (rt) are the standard of care for early breast cancer, although some women receive ipsilateral mastectomy or adjuvant tamoxifen, both of which can be appropriate alternatives to rt. Objectives of the present study were to determine the proportion of women who are treated appropriately after bcs and to identify factors associated with non-receipt of rt. Methods This retrospective cohort study used Ontario data linked at the Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences to examine 33,718 patients who received bcs during 2004-2010. Primary outcome was rt receipt. The ipsilateral mastectomy rate and patient, surgeon, and setting variables were measured. Results Of the study patients, 86.1% received either rt or completion mastectomy; in the cohort less than 70 years of age, 90.8% received rt or completion mastectomy. Among patients less than 70 years of age, 3 risk factors for non-receipt of rt were identified: age less than 46 years, treatment in a non-academic institution, and earlier year of initial bcs. Additionally, in the overall cohort, rt non-receipt was associated with high comorbidity, more than 40 km to the cancer centre, income quintile, and breast care specialization. Conclusions In Ontario, 90.8% of patients less than 70 years of age are appropriately treated for early breast cancer; approximately 1 in 10 do not receive rt or completion mastectomy. Based on those findings, women less than 46 years of age might be at increased risk of recurrence and death because of incomplete treatment. It also appears that academic centres more effectively treat breast cancer; however, breast cancer care appears to be improving over time in Ontario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Guidolin
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - M Lock
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London.,London Health Sciences Centre, London
| | - K Vogt
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London.,London Health Sciences Centre, London
| | - J A McClure
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, London, ON
| | - J Winick-Ng
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, London, ON
| | - C Vinden
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London.,London Health Sciences Centre, London.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, London, ON
| | - M Brackstone
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London.,London Health Sciences Centre, London
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tundo G, Khaleel S, Pais VM. Gender Equivalence in the Prevalence of Nephrolithiasis among Adults Younger than 50 Years in the United States. J Urol 2018; 200:1273-1277. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gina Tundo
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Sari Khaleel
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Vernon M. Pais
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Goldstein KM, Zullig LL, Dedert EA, Alishahi Tabriz A, Brearly TW, Raitz G, Sata SS, Whited JD, Bosworth HB, Gordon AM, Nagi A, Williams JW, Gierisch JM. Telehealth Interventions Designed for Women: an Evidence Map. J Gen Intern Med 2018; 33:2191-2200. [PMID: 30284173 PMCID: PMC6258612 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4655-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Revised: 07/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telehealth employs technology to connect patients to the right healthcare resources at the right time. Women are high utilizers of healthcare with gender-specific health issues that may benefit from the convenience and personalization of telehealth. Thus, we produced an evidence map describing the quantity, distribution, and characteristics of evidence assessing the effectiveness of telehealth services designed for women. METHODS We searched MEDLINE® (via PubMed®) and Embase® from inception through March 20, 2018. We screened systematic reviews (SRs), randomized trials, and quasi-experimental studies using predetermined eligibility criteria. Articles meeting inclusion criteria were identified for data abstraction. To assess emerging trends, we also conducted a targeted search of ClinicalTrials.gov . RESULTS Two hundred thirty-four primary studies and three SRs were eligible for abstraction. We grouped studies into focused areas of research: maternal health (n = 96), prevention (n = 46), disease management (n = 63), family planning (n = 9), high-risk breast cancer assessment (n = 10), intimate partner violence (n = 7), and mental health (n = 3). Most interventions focused on phone as the primary telehealth modality and featured healthcare team-to-patient communication and were limited in duration (e.g., < 12 weeks). Few interventions were conducted with older women (≥ 60 years) or in racially/ethnically diverse populations. There are few SRs in this area and limited evidence regarding newer telehealth modalities such as mobile-based applications or short message service/texting. Targeted search of clinical.trials.gov yielded 73 ongoing studies that show a shift in the use of non-telephone modalities. DISCUSSION Our systematic evidence map highlights gaps in the existing literature, such as a lack of studies in key women's health areas (intimate partner violence, mental health), and a dearth of relevant SRs. With few existing SRs in this literature, there is an opportunity for examining effects, efficiency, and acceptability across studies to inform efforts at implementing telehealth for women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M Goldstein
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA. .,Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Leah L Zullig
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Eric A Dedert
- Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,VA Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Amir Alishahi Tabriz
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Timothy W Brearly
- Salisbury Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Salisbury, NC, USA.,Neuropsychology Assessment Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Giselle Raitz
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - John D Whited
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Hayden B Bosworth
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Adelaide M Gordon
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Avishek Nagi
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John W Williams
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer M Gierisch
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Harness JK, Shah C. ASO Author Reflections: Meta-Analysis of Local Recurrence of Invasive Breast Cancer After Electron Intraoperative Radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:632-633. [PMID: 30264253 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6791-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jay K Harness
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Treatment, St. Joseph Hospital, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Guidolin K, Lock M, Brackstone M. Patient-perceived barriers to radiation therapy for breast cancer. Can J Surg 2017; 61:15716. [PMID: 29171833 DOI: 10.1503/cjs.015716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
SUMMARY Studies have shown that a number of women do not receive adjuvant radiation therapy following breast-conserving surgery; the reasons have not been well investigated. We reviewed the charts of 267 patients in our institution who did not receive radiation therapy following surgery in order to determine patientstated reasons for nonreceipt. We found that 43% of patients did not receive radiation because they received a completion mastectomy. Excluding these patients, reasons for nonreceipt of radiation therapy were sorted into 9 categories. Most patients declined radiation therapy (against physician advice). We identified 3 major barriers to receipt of radiation therapy: improper patient selection, transportation or ambulatory issues and patient fear surrounding radiation toxicity. All of these reasons are surmountable barriers to radiation receipt.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keegan Guidolin
- From the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. (Guidolin, Lock, Brackstone); and the London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. (Lock, Brackstone)
| | - Michael Lock
- From the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. (Guidolin, Lock, Brackstone); and the London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. (Lock, Brackstone)
| | - Muriel Brackstone
- From the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. (Guidolin, Lock, Brackstone); and the London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. (Lock, Brackstone)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chance WW, Ortiz-Ortiz KJ, Liao KP, Zavala Zegarra DE, Stauder MC, Giordano SH, Tortolero-Luna G, Guadagnolo BA. Underuse of Radiation Therapy After Breast Conservation Surgery in Puerto Rico: A Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry-Health Insurance Linkage Database Study. J Glob Oncol 2017; 4:1-9. [PMID: 30241162 PMCID: PMC6180809 DOI: 10.1200/jgo.2016.008664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To identify rates of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) after breast
conservation surgery (BCS) in women with stage I or II invasive breast
cancer treated in Puerto Rico and to examine the sociodemographic and health
services characteristics associated with variations in receipt of RT. Methods The Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry–Health Insurance Linkage
Database was used to identify patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer
between 2008 and 2012 in Puerto Rico. Claims codes identified the type of
surgery and the use of RT. Logistic regression models were used to examine
the independent association between sociodemographic and clinical
covariates. Results Among women who received BCS as their primary definitive treatment, 64%
received adjuvant RT. Significant predictors of RT after BCS included
enrollment in Medicare (odds ratio [OR], 2.14; 95% CI, 1.46 to 3.13;
P ≤ .01) and dual eligibility for Medicare and
Medicaid (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.27; P < .01).
In addition, it was found that RT was more likely to have been received in
certain geographic locations, including the Metro-North (OR, 2.20; 95% CI,
1.48 to 3.28; P < .01), North (OR, 1.78; 95% CI,
1.20 to 2.64; P < .01), West (OR, 4.04; 95% CI, 2.61
to 6.25; P < .01), and Southwest (OR, 2.79; 95% CI,
1.70 to 4.59; P < .01). Furthermore, patients with
tumor size > 2.0 cm and ≤ 5.0 cm (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40 to
0.93; P = .02) and those with tumor size > 5.0 cm
(OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.92; P = .03) were found to be
significantly less likely to receive RT. Conclusion Underuse of RT after BCS was identified in Puerto Rico. Patients enrolled in
Medicare and those who were dually eligible for Medicaid and Medicare were
more likely to receive RT after BCS compared with patients with Medicaid
alone. There were geographic variations in the receipt of RT on the
island.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William W Chance
- William W. Chance, Kai-Ping Liao, Michael C. Stauder, Sharon H. Giordano, and B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karen J. Ortiz-Ortiz, Diego E. Zavala Zegarra, and Guillermo Tortolero-Luna, University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Karen J Ortiz-Ortiz
- William W. Chance, Kai-Ping Liao, Michael C. Stauder, Sharon H. Giordano, and B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karen J. Ortiz-Ortiz, Diego E. Zavala Zegarra, and Guillermo Tortolero-Luna, University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Kai-Ping Liao
- William W. Chance, Kai-Ping Liao, Michael C. Stauder, Sharon H. Giordano, and B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karen J. Ortiz-Ortiz, Diego E. Zavala Zegarra, and Guillermo Tortolero-Luna, University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Diego E Zavala Zegarra
- William W. Chance, Kai-Ping Liao, Michael C. Stauder, Sharon H. Giordano, and B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karen J. Ortiz-Ortiz, Diego E. Zavala Zegarra, and Guillermo Tortolero-Luna, University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Michael C Stauder
- William W. Chance, Kai-Ping Liao, Michael C. Stauder, Sharon H. Giordano, and B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karen J. Ortiz-Ortiz, Diego E. Zavala Zegarra, and Guillermo Tortolero-Luna, University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- William W. Chance, Kai-Ping Liao, Michael C. Stauder, Sharon H. Giordano, and B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karen J. Ortiz-Ortiz, Diego E. Zavala Zegarra, and Guillermo Tortolero-Luna, University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Guillermo Tortolero-Luna
- William W. Chance, Kai-Ping Liao, Michael C. Stauder, Sharon H. Giordano, and B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karen J. Ortiz-Ortiz, Diego E. Zavala Zegarra, and Guillermo Tortolero-Luna, University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - B Ashleigh Guadagnolo
- William W. Chance, Kai-Ping Liao, Michael C. Stauder, Sharon H. Giordano, and B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Karen J. Ortiz-Ortiz, Diego E. Zavala Zegarra, and Guillermo Tortolero-Luna, University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Guidolin K, Lock M, Richard L, Boldt G, Brackstone M. Predicting which patients actually receive radiation following breast conserving therapy in Canadian populations. Can J Surg 2017; 59:358-60. [PMID: 27438052 DOI: 10.1503/cjs.000516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
SUMMARY Canadian women with breast cancer may choose breast conserving therapy as their course of treatment, requiring both breast conserving surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy. However, more than 15% of Canadian women fail to receive the appropriate radiation therapy, putting them at increased risk for recurrence. Age, distance from their radiation therapy centre and stage of disease affect patients' likelihood of receiving prescribed radiation therapy. We propose a nomogram that allows physicians to predict which patients will and will not receive radiation. This nomogram, once validated, could be used to guide decision making when choosing between breast conserving therapy and mastectomy as the treatment course and thereby change the practice of breast cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keegan Guidolin
- From the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. (Guidolin, Lock, Brackstone); and the London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. (Lock, Richard, Boldt, Brackstone)
| | - Michael Lock
- From the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. (Guidolin, Lock, Brackstone); and the London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. (Lock, Richard, Boldt, Brackstone)
| | - Lucie Richard
- From the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. (Guidolin, Lock, Brackstone); and the London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. (Lock, Richard, Boldt, Brackstone)
| | - Gabriel Boldt
- From the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. (Guidolin, Lock, Brackstone); and the London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. (Lock, Richard, Boldt, Brackstone)
| | - Muriel Brackstone
- From the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. (Guidolin, Lock, Brackstone); and the London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. (Lock, Richard, Boldt, Brackstone)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cosmesis and Breast-Related Quality of Life Outcomes After Intraoperative Radiation Therapy for Early Breast Cancer: A Substudy of the TARGIT-A Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 96:55-64. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2016] [Revised: 04/05/2016] [Accepted: 04/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
20
|
Hieken TJ, Mutter RW, Jakub JW, Boughey JC, Degnim AC, Sukov WR, Childs S, Corbin KS, Furutani KM, Whitaker TJ, Park SS. A Novel Treatment Schedule for Rapid Completion of Surgery and Radiation in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:3297-303. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5321-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
21
|
Smith GL. Toward Minimizing Overtreatment and Undertreatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:1172-4. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.66.2064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Grace L. Smith
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Loveland-Jones C, Lin H, Shen Y, Bedrosian I, Shaitelman S, Kuerer H, Woodward W, Ueno N, Valero V, Babiera G. Disparities in the Use of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy for Inflammatory Breast Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95:1218-25. [PMID: 27209502 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2015] [Revised: 02/22/2016] [Accepted: 02/29/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although radiation therapy improves locoregional control and survival for inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), it is underused in this population. The purpose of this study was to identify variables associated with the underuse of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) for IBC. METHODS AND MATERIALS Using the 1998 to 2011 National Cancer Data Base, we identified 8273 women who underwent mastectomy for nonmetastatic IBC. We used logistic regression modeling to determine the demographic, tumor, and treatment variables associated with the underuse of PMRT. RESULTS Although the use of PMRT increased over time, a total of 30.3% of our cohort did not receive PMRT. On multivariate analysis, variables associated with the underuse of PMRT for IBC included the following (all P<.05): Medicare insurance (odds ratio [OR] = 0.70), annual income <$34,999 (<$30,000: OR=0.79; $30,000-$34,999: OR=0.82), cN2 and cN0 disease (cN2: OR=0.71; cN0: OR=0.63), failure to receive chemotherapy and hormone therapy (chemotherapy: OR=0.15; hormone therapy: OR=0.35), treatment at lower-volume centers (OR=0.83), and treatment in the South and West (South: OR=0.73; West: OR=0.80). Greater distance between patient's residence and radiation facility was also associated with the underuse of PMRT (P=.0001). CONCLUSIONS Although the use of PMRT for IBC has increased over time, it continues to be underused. Disparities related to a variety of variables impact which IBC patients receive PMRT. A concerted effort must be made to address these disparities in order to optimize the outcomes for IBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heather Lin
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yu Shen
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | - Henry Kuerer
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Wendy Woodward
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; MD Anderson Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, Houston, Texas
| | - Naoto Ueno
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; MD Anderson Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, Houston, Texas
| | - Vicente Valero
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; MD Anderson Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, Houston, Texas
| | - Gildy Babiera
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; MD Anderson Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Impact of young age on local control after partial breast irradiation in Japanese patients with early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2016; 24:79-85. [PMID: 26832859 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-016-0669-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2015] [Accepted: 01/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Partial breast irradiation (PBI) is an alternative to whole breast irradiation (WBI) for breast-conserving therapy (BCT). A randomised phase 3 trial demonstrated that PBI using multicatheter brachytherapy had an equivalent rate of local recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival as compared to WBI. However, limited data are available on PBI efficacy for young patients with breast cancer. METHODS We evaluated consecutive patients with Tis-2 (≤ 3 cm) N0-1 breast cancer who underwent BCT. For PBI, patients received radiotherapy using multicatheter brachytherapy in an accelerated manner with a dose of 32 Gy in eight fractions over 5-6 days. For WBI, patients received an external beam radiation therapy that was applied to the entire breast with a total dose of 50 Gy in fractions of 2 Gy for 5 weeks. Two hundred seventy-four patients with 278 lesions received PBI; 190 patients with 193 lesions received WBI. RESULTS Patients aged <50 years including 98 women with 99 lesions receiving PBI and 85 women with 85 lesions receiving WBI were selected. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rate was 3.0 and 2.4 % by PBI and WBI, respectively (P = 0.99). There was no significant difference in 4-year probability of disease-free survival (97.6 and 91.4 % for PBI and WBI, respectively; P = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS This is the first report of PBI efficacy in young patients in Asia. Although it is a nonrandomized retrospective chart review of a small cohort of patients with a relatively short follow-up period, PBI may be a better option than WBI following BCS in some young patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in young women in the USA. Although breast cancer mortality has decreased overall, survival rates in young women remain lower than those in older women. Young women with breast cancer comprise a special population due to the aggressive biology of their tumors as well as their unique psychosocial concerns. Although general treatment principles are similar regardless of age, recent developments from research focused on younger women have provided new insights to guide treatment of this special population. This article will focus on these new developments in areas including endocrine therapy and fertility preservation as well as the unique treatment-related sequelae and psychosocial concerns among young women with breast cancer face.
Collapse
|
25
|
Did the adoption of accelerated partial-breast irradiation reduce the noncompliance with adjuvant radiation in lumpectomy patients? Am J Surg 2015; 212:178-9. [PMID: 26363520 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2015] [Revised: 06/14/2015] [Accepted: 06/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The underutilization of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery in early-stage breast cancer patients has been attributed to the inconvenience and potential side effects of whole-breast radiation treatment regimens. Accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) involves twice-daily treatments more than 4 to 5 days, which could potentially improve convenience and adherence for women undergoing treatment. METHODS We studied local therapies in about one-third of a million female breast cancer patients who were diagnosed between January 2000 and June 2011. RESULTS We found that the use of APBI brachytherapy increased rapidly from .2% in 2000 to about 3.1% in 2008 and leveled off after 2009. The increased use of APBI did not reduce the percentage of early-stage breast cancer patients who improperly forego radiation (about 14% over the whole study period). CONCLUSIONS Noncompliance with adjuvant radiation is still common when shortened radiation therapy becomes increasingly accessible.
Collapse
|
26
|
Fernandes-Taylor S, Adesoye T, Bloom JR. Managing psychosocial issues faced by young women with breast cancer at the time of diagnosis and during active treatment. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2015; 9:279-84. [PMID: 26164840 PMCID: PMC5787858 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review examines recent literature on the psychosocial needs of and interventions for young women. We focus on the active treatment period given the toxicity of treatment, the incidence of anxiety, and depressive symptoms in these women during treatment. This review summarizes research relevant to addressing their social and emotional concerns. RECENT FINDINGS Young women undergoing treatment for breast cancer remain understudied despite unique needs. Psychoeducational interventions help to relieve symptoms and emotional distress during treatment, but effects do not appear to persist over the longer term. In the clinical context, the performance of prognostic-risk prediction models in this population is poor. Surgical decision-making is often driven by fear of recurrence and body image rather than prognosis, and decision aids may help young women to synthesize information to preserve their role in the treatment process. SUMMARY First, shared decision-making, second, balancing body image, fear of recurrence, and recommended treatment, and third, palliative care for metastasis are essential research priorities for the clinical setting. In the larger social context, unique family/partner dynamics as well as financial and insurance concerns warrant particular attention in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Fernandes-Taylor
- Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Taiwo Adesoye
- Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Joan R. Bloom
- School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Recommendations from GEC ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group (I): Target definition and target delineation for accelerated or boost Partial Breast Irradiation using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy after breast conserving closed cavity surgery. Radiother Oncol 2015; 115:342-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2015] [Revised: 06/08/2015] [Accepted: 06/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
28
|
Smith GL, Huo J, Giordano SH, Hunt KK, Buchholz TA, Smith BD. Utilization and Outcomes of Breast Brachytherapy in Younger Women. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 93:91-101. [PMID: 26279027 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2014] [Revised: 03/09/2015] [Accepted: 05/08/2015] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To directly compare (1) radiation treatment utilization patterns; (2) risks of subsequent mastectomy; and (3) costs of radiation treatment in patients treated with brachytherapy versus whole-breast irradiation (WBI), in a national, contemporary cohort of women with incident breast cancer, aged 64 years and younger. METHODS AND MATERIALS Using MarketScan health care claims data, we identified 45,884 invasive breast cancer patients (aged 18-64 years), treated from 2003 to 2010 with lumpectomy, followed by brachytherapy (n = 3134) or whole-breast irradiation (n = 42,750). We stratified patients into risk groups according to age (Age < 50 vs Age ≥ 50) and endocrine therapy status (Endocrine- vs Endocrine+). "Endocrine+" patients filled an endocrine therapy prescription within 1 year after lumpectomy. Pathologic hormone receptor status was not available in this dataset. In brachytherapy versus WBI patients, utilization trends and 5-year subsequent mastectomy risks were compared. Stratified, adjusted subsequent mastectomy risks were calculated using proportional hazards regression. RESULTS Brachytherapy utilization increased from 2003 to 2010: in patients Age < 50, from 0.6% to 4.9%; patients Age ≥ 50 from 2.2% to 11.3%; Endocrine- patients, 1.3% to 9.4%; Endocrine+ patients, 1.9% to 9.7%. Age influenced treatment selection more than endocrine status: 17% of brachytherapy patients were Age < 50 versus 32% of WBI patients (P < .001); whereas 41% of brachytherapy patients were Endocrine-versus 44% of WBI patients (P = .003). Highest absolute 5-year subsequent mastectomy risks occurred in Endocrine-/Age < 50 patients (24.4% after brachytherapy vs 9.0% after WBI (hazard ratio [HR] 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-3.47); intermediate risks in Endocrine-/Age ≥ 50 patients (8.6% vs 4.9%; HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.26-2.46); and lowest risks in Endocrine+ patients of any age: Endocrine+/Age < 50 (5.5% vs 4.5%; HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.61-2.31); Endocrine+/Age ≥ 50 (4.2% vs 2.4%; HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.16-2.51). CONCLUSION In this younger cohort, endocrine status was a valuable discriminatory factor predicting subsequent mastectomy risk after brachytherapy versus WBI and therefore may be useful for selecting appropriate younger brachytherapy candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace L Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jinhai Huo
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas A Buchholz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Costs of hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery and readmissions in privately insured US patients. J Surg Res 2015; 199:478-86. [PMID: 26026853 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2015] [Revised: 03/19/2015] [Accepted: 05/01/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical costs are influenced by perioperative care, readmissions, and further therapies. We aimed to characterize costs in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery in the United States. METHODS The MarketScan database (2008-2010) was used to identify privately insured patients undergoing pancreatectomy (n = 2254) or hepatectomy (n = 1702). Costs associated with the index surgery, readmissions, and total short-term costs were assessed from a third party payer perspective using generalized linear regression models. RESULTS Mean total costs of pancreatectomy and hepatectomy were $107,600 (95% confidence interval [CI], 101,200-114,000) and $81,300 (95% CI, 77,600-85,000), respectively, with corresponding surgical costs of 69.2% and 60.9%. Ninety-day readmission costs were $36,200 (95% CI, 32,000-40,400) and $34,100 (95% CI, 28,100-40,100), respectively. In multivariate analysis, readmissions were associated with an almost two-fold increase in total costs in both pancreatectomy (cost ratio = 1.98; P < 0.001) and hepatectomy (cost ratio = 1.92; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery is associated with significant economic burden in the privately insured population. Substantial costs are incurred beyond the index surgical admission, with readmissions representing a major source of potentially preventable health care spending. Sustained efforts in defining high-risk populations and decreasing the burden of postoperative complications through a combination of prevention and improved outpatient management offer promising strategies to reduce readmissions and control costs.
Collapse
|
30
|
Ye JC, Yan W, Christos PJ, Nori D, Ravi A. Equivalent Survival With Mastectomy or Breast-conserving Surgery Plus Radiation in Young Women Aged < 40 Years With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A National Registry-based Stage-by-Stage Comparison. Clin Breast Cancer 2015; 15:390-7. [PMID: 25957740 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2014] [Revised: 03/23/2015] [Accepted: 03/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have shown that young patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC) are increasingly undergoing mastectomy instead of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) consisting of lumpectomy and radiation. We examined the difference in outcomes in young women (aged < 40 years) who had undergone BCT versus mastectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for women aged < 40 years with stage I or II invasive BC treated with surgery from 1998 to 2003. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test between treatment types. RESULTS Of the 7665 women, 3249 received BCT and 2627 underwent mastectomy without radiation. When separated by stage (I, IIA, and IIB), with a median follow-up duration of 111 months, the BCT and mastectomy-only groups showed no statistically significant differences in BCSS and OS. Overall, the age group of 35 to 39 years (66% of total) was associated with better 10-year BCSS (88%) and OS (86.1%) compared with the younger patients aged 20 to 34 years (34% of total). The latter group had a 10-year BCSS and OS of 84.1% and 82.3%, respectively (P < .001 for both BCSS and OS). However, when the patients of each age group were further subdivided by stage, the BCT group continued to show noninferior BCSS and OS compared with the mastectomy group in all subgroups. CONCLUSION The results of our study suggest that although young age might be a poor prognostic factor for BC, no evidence has shown that these patients will have better outcomes after mastectomy than after BCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason C Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Hospital Queens/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
| | - Weisi Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Hospital Queens/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Paul J Christos
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Dattatreyudu Nori
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Hospital Queens/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Akkamma Ravi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Hospital Queens/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Radiation Treatment Strategies in Patients Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-014-0171-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
32
|
Jagsi R, Bekelman JE, Chen A, Chen RC, Hoffman K, Shih YCT, Smith BD, Yu JB. Considerations for observational research using large data sets in radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 90:11-24. [PMID: 25195986 PMCID: PMC4159773 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2014] [Revised: 05/10/2014] [Accepted: 05/12/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The radiation oncology community has witnessed growing interest in observational research conducted using large-scale data sources such as registries and claims-based data sets. With the growing emphasis on observational analyses in health care, the radiation oncology community must possess a sophisticated understanding of the methodological considerations of such studies in order to evaluate evidence appropriately to guide practice and policy. Because observational research has unique features that distinguish it from clinical trials and other forms of traditional radiation oncology research, the International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics assembled a panel of experts in health services research to provide a concise and well-referenced review, intended to be informative for the lay reader, as well as for scholars who wish to embark on such research without prior experience. This review begins by discussing the types of research questions relevant to radiation oncology that large-scale databases may help illuminate. It then describes major potential data sources for such endeavors, including information regarding access and insights regarding the strengths and limitations of each. Finally, it provides guidance regarding the analytical challenges that observational studies must confront, along with discussion of the techniques that have been developed to help minimize the impact of certain common analytical issues in observational analysis. Features characterizing a well-designed observational study include clearly defined research questions, careful selection of an appropriate data source, consultation with investigators with relevant methodological expertise, inclusion of sensitivity analyses, caution not to overinterpret small but significant differences, and recognition of limitations when trying to evaluate causality. This review concludes that carefully designed and executed studies using observational data that possess these qualities hold substantial promise for advancing our understanding of many unanswered questions of importance to the field of radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Justin E Bekelman
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Aileen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Karen Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ya-Chen Tina Shih
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hospital Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, and Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - James B Yu
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rueth NM, Lin HY, Bedrosian I, Shaitelman SF, Ueno NT, Shen Y, Babiera G. Underuse of trimodality treatment affects survival for patients with inflammatory breast cancer: an analysis of treatment and survival trends from the National Cancer Database. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:2018-24. [PMID: 24888808 PMCID: PMC4067942 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.55.1978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze factors that predict the use of trimodality treatment (chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy [RT]) and evaluate the impact that trimodality treatment use has on survival for patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). METHODS Using the National Cancer Data Base, patients who underwent surgical treatment of nonmetastatic IBC from 1998 to 2010 were identified. We collected demographic, tumor, and treatment data and analyzed treatment and survival trends over time. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine factors predicting treatment and survival. RESULTS We identified 10,197 patients who fulfilled study criteria. The use of trimodality therapy fluctuated annually (58.4% to 73.4%). Patients who were older, diagnosed earlier in the study period, lived in regions of the country outside of the Midwest, had lower incomes or public insurance, and had a higher comorbid score were significantly less likely to receive trimodality therapy (all P < .05). Five- and 10-year survival rates were highest among patients receiving trimodality treatment (55.4% and 37.3%, respectively) compared with patients who received the combination of surgery plus chemotherapy, surgery plus RT, or surgery alone. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, use of trimodality therapy remained a significant independent predictor of survival. CONCLUSION Underutilization of trimodality therapy negatively impacted survival for patients with IBC. The use of trimodality therapy increased marginally with time, but there remain significant factors associated with differences in use of trimodality treatment. We have identified specific barriers to care that may be targeted to improve treatment delivery and potentially improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha M Rueth
- All authors: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Heather Y Lin
- All authors: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Isabelle Bedrosian
- All authors: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Naoto T Ueno
- All authors: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yu Shen
- All authors: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gildy Babiera
- All authors: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
First international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY1). Breast 2014; 23:209-20. [PMID: 24767882 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2014] [Revised: 03/25/2014] [Accepted: 03/25/2014] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The 1st International Consensus Conference for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY1) took place in November 2012, in Dublin, Ireland organized by the European School of Oncology (ESO). Consensus recommendations for management of breast cancer in young women were developed and areas of research priorities were identified. This manuscript summarizes these international consensus recommendations, which are also endorsed by the European Society of Breast Specialists (EUSOMA).
Collapse
|