Measuring Self-Efficacy in the Context of Pediatric Diabetes Management: Psychometric Properties of the Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale

Implementation of Psychosocial Screening into Diabetes Clinics: Experience from the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Quality Improvement Network

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although advances in diabetes technology and pharmacology have significantly and positively impacted diabetes management and health outcomes for some, diabetes care remains burdensome and can be challenging to balance with other life priorities. The purpose of this article is to review the rationale for assessment of psychosocial domains in diabetes care settings and strategies for the implementation of psychosocial screening into routine practice. Survey data from the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Quality Improvement Network is highlighted.

RECENT FINDINGS

Implementation of psychosocial screening requires identifying the population; selecting validated tools to assess target domains; determining frequency of screening and mode of survey delivery; and scoring, interpreting, documenting, and facilitating referrals such that these processes are part of clinical workflows. Recognizing the influence of psychosocial factors for people with diabetes (PWD), professional society guidelines for comprehensive diabetes care recommend the integration of psychosocial screening into routine care.

Applying the use of shared medical appointments (SMAs) to improve continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use, glycemic control, and quality of life in marginalized youth with type 1 diabetes: Study protocol for a pilot prospective cohort study

Background

Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) have been associated with improved glycemic control and diabetes-related quality of life in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D), however use is lowest among youth from low-income households and racial/ethnic minorities. Shared medical appointments (SMAs) have been shown to improve glycemic control and reduce diabetes distress in adolescents with T1D, but a focus on marginalized youth has been lacking. This prospective cohort pilot study will assess feasibility and acceptability of the SMA intervention and impact on CGM uptake and sustained use, glycemic control, and diabetes distress in marginalized youth with elevated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C).

Methods

The pilot study will recruit 20 publicly insured youth with T1D aged 8-12 years who identify as non-Hispanic Black or Latinx and have had at least one HbA1C value > 8% in the past year and their primary caretaker. The trial will employ an enrollment visit, SMA visits every 3 months over a 12-month study period, and a 6-month follow-up observational period. Feasibility measures include proportion of eligible youth successfully recruited for participation, proportion initiating CGM, SMA attendance, and retention through study completion. Acceptability will be assessed using satisfaction surveys. Changes in glycemic control will be assessed using CGM metrics and A1c from baseline to completion of the 12-month SMA intervention, as well as 3 and 6-months after completion of the SMA intervention.

Conclusion

Implementing SMAs for marginalized youth has the potential to address diabetes disparities by optimizing clinical and psychosocial outcomes for the most vulnerable youth living with T1D.Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05431686.

Latent classifications of parental involvement in diabetes management for youth with type 1 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Understanding how parent-child relationships influence diabetes management in youth with type 1 diabetes is critical for minimizing the risk of short- and long-term complications. We examined how classes of diabetes-specific parenting behaviors are associated with disease management and well-being for youth with type 1 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The Family Management of Diabetes clinical trial tested the efficacy of a 2-year behavioral intervention for families of youth with type 1 diabetes. Three hundred and ninety youth diagnosed with type 1 diabetes and their primary caregiver were recruited from four pediatric endocrinology centers in the US Classifications of parental involvement utilized baseline parent and youth reports of task involvement, collaborative involvement, and parent-youth conflict. Class differences in baseline glycemic control (HbA1c), regimen adherence, general and diabetes quality of life, and depressive symptoms, and 2-year change in HbA1c were examined.

RESULTS

Latent profile analysis identified three classes: (1) high in task and collaborative involvement, low in conflict (Harmonious), (2) low in task involvement, collaborative involvement, and conflict (Indifferent), (3) high in task involvement and conflict, low in collaborative involvement (Inharmonious). The Harmonious group demonstrated the best adherence, glycemic control, and psychosocial well-being. The Inharmonious and Indifferent groups had similar diabetes management, but youth from Inharmonious families showed poorer psychosocial well-being. The intervention effect on glycemic control did not differ across the classes.

CONCLUSIONS

The interplay of parental involvement and conflict resulted in distinct parenting classes that differed in disease management and well-being. However, the classes benefitted similarly from the behavioral intervention.

Effectiveness of Game-Based Self-Management Interventions for Individuals with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective: Self-management is essential for individuals with diabetes. However, traditional self-management interventions may be hard to follow for other patients. Although games can stimulate extrinsic motivations, its application on self-management remains unclear. This review aims to evaluate the effects of game-based self-management interventions on health outcomes. Materials and Methods: We utilize PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, EMBASE, ProQuest Dissertation and Theses, PsycINFO, and Scopus from their inception until January 20, 2020. Meta-analyses are performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis 3.0 software. The overall effect is measured using Hedges' g and determined using Z-statistics at significance level of P < 0.05. Heterogeneity is assessed using χ² and I² statistics. The risk of bias tool and the grades of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation system are used to assess individual and overall quality of evidence, respectively. Results: A total of 2150 records are identified, and 13 randomized controlled trials are selected. Meta-analyses revealed that game-based self-management interventions significantly improved patients' change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level (g = 0.18, P = 0.02), adherence to physical activities (g = 0.59, P < 0.001), balance (g = 0.94-1.14, P < 0.001), and fall efficacy (g = 1.01, P < 0.001). Significant results were only found for the three-trial meta-analysis for HbA1c changes, but not for the two other HbA1c meta-analyses that included more trials. Furthermore, negligible improvements were observed in glycated hemoglobin at postintervention and follow-up assessments, diabetes knowledge, and self-efficacy. Conclusion: Game-based self-management can consider a supplementary intervention. Overall evidence is ranging from very low to low. Future studies can consider a large sample size with high-quality design according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement criteria.

An Expert Opinion on "Glycemic Happiness": Delineating the Concept and Determinant Factors for Persons with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

The importance of the psychological impact of diabetes is globally well-documented. Evidence suggests that there is a high level of psychosocial burden of diabetes in India. Moreover, there is a lack of relevant knowledge among the patients and caregivers regarding the psychological impact of diabetes and how to cope with it, as compared to the majority of other countries. “Happiness of the patient” is an essential component of diabetes management, which potentially affects the treatment outcome, treatment adherence, self-care, and lifelong management of diabetes. Although several validated tools and scales exist for measuring psychological outcomes both in patients and physicians, tools to assess “happiness in diabetes care” are still lacking. With this background, an expert group meeting was held in India in September 2019, involving nine expert diabetologists and endocrinologists across the country to discuss the concept of “glycemic happiness”. This article summarizes the expert opinion on the factors affecting psychological outcomes in diabetes, introduces the concept of glycemic happiness, describes available scales and tools to measure general happiness, and delineates the five sets of questionnaires developed with questions that may help correlate with “glycemic happiness”. The questionnaires are based on a five-point Likert method. The experts also discussed and decided upon the study design for a proposed observational survey to assess glycemic happiness of persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) based on the developed five sets of questionnaires. Given the huge burden of diabetes in India, the introduction of the concept of glycemic happiness will help in the optimization of diabetes care in the country.

What Affects Quality of Life for People with Type 1 Diabetes?: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

This study investigated the association between the quality of life (QOL) and type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM), a lifelong disease that requires constant management. A complex set of factors influence the QOL of people with type 1 DM, and understanding these factors requires further research. This research is a cross-sectional descriptive study. A survey on related variables such as acceptance of disease and efficacy for self-management of diabetes, was conducted among 111 participants with type 1 DM. The collected data were analyzed using PASW Statistics program, and factors influencing participants' QOL were identified through hierarchical multiple regression. The study followed the Guidelines of Systematic Reporting of Examination in the STROBE checklist. The results showed that four variables exerted a significant effect on QOL (blood glucose level at hypoglycemia and complications in Model 1; efficacy for self-management of diabetes and acceptance and action in Model 2), and all the variables explained a majority of the variance in QOL. The results indicate that management of severe hypoglycemia and prevention of complications is crucial. Interventions should be developed to enhance coping abilities to improve efficacy for self-management for those with diabetes and promote their acceptance of the disease.

Factors associated with diabetes distress among adolescents with type 1 diabetes

AIMS

To describe the specific domains of diabetes distress and factors associated with these domains.

BACKGROUND

Diabetes distress is a common problem but not well recognised in adolescents by healthcare providers or adolescents themselves. There is insufficient evidence on how specific domains of diabetes distress exist in adolescents, making it challenging to select precise components to alleviate diabetes stress.

DESIGN

A quantitative, descriptive and cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Data were collected on socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, diabetes distress, perceived stress, self-efficacy and diabetes self-management using established questionnaires. Multivariate linear regression was conducted to examine the associations between specific factors and four domains in diabetes distress. STROBE checklist was used as the guideline for this study.

RESULTS

A total of 100 adolescents with type 1 diabetes aged 12 to 18 years participated in this study. Adolescents experienced the highest levels of distress in the regimen-related distress [2.41 (SD =0.82)] and physician-related distress [2.40 (SD =0.80)] domains. Older age, female gender, more diabetes problem-solving and higher levels of perceived stress were associated with higher regimen-related distress (β = 0.21 ~ 0.45, p < 0.05). Older age, female gender, a lower degree of endorsement of relevant diabetes-related goals and higher levels of perceived stress were associated with higher physician-related distress (β = -0.29 ~ 0.34, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes distress was reported more on regimen-related and physician-related domains among adolescents with type 1 diabetes in China, associating with older age, female, increased perceived stress and poor diabetes-related problem-solving.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses need to screen the specific domains of diabetes distress among adolescents with type 1 diabetes, especially for the older adolescents and girls. This study highlighted the importance of incorporating diabetes-related problem-solving support and stress management strategies into diabetes management for adolescents with type 1 diabetes, which could help relieve diabetes distress.

[Validation of the German Version of Pediatric Self-Efficacy for Diabetes-Type-1 Scale]

INTRODUCTION

Since there is no suitable tool for measuring the specific, diabetes-related self-efficacy in children with type-1-diabetes in German language, this paper presents the construction and validation of Pediatric Self-Efficacy for Diabetes-Type-1 Scale (PSEDT-1). The intention was to develop a guideline-compliant, pediatric, revised self-efficacy scale on the basis of Grossman, Brink and Hauser̓s SED.

DESIGN

Children with type 1 diabetes (N=221) were included in a clinical, multi-centre validation study. To assess sensitivity to change, 85 of these children were asked to complete the PSEDT-1 before, immediately after, and 6 months after inpatient diabetes training. PSEDT-1 has been associated with scales that measure constructs that are similar and different in terms of content. The interpretation of the correlation results should provide information on validity. The PSEDT-1 was thus reviewed using the German Multidimensional Self-Assessment Scale (MSWS), the German questionnaire on health and illness-related control beliefs (KKG).

RESULTS

The reliability results showed a good internal consistency with Cronbach's α=0,87; the discriminatory power of the items was acceptable. Exploratory factor analysis identified 4 factors that account for 54% of the variance: 1) diabetes self-management skill, 2) (medical) insulin management competence, 3) (general) self-assertiveness, 4) autonomous self-regulation. The construct validity of PSEDT-1 has been evaluated by estimating its association with other variables. It was possible to verify the theoretically expected correlation patterns. In addition, the study results showed indications of sufficiently high sensitivity to change.

DISCUSSION

The results suggest that PSEDT-1 is a valid and reliable tool that, in addition to the scale values of the competence areas of diabetes self-management, medical management, and general self-assertion, also determines the scale value of autonomous self-regulation to assess diabetes-related self-efficacy.