1
|
Mohammed H, Peut C, McMillan M, Wang B, Sullivan TR, Marshall HS. THE ROLE OF SCHOOLS IN MENINGOCOCCAL CARRIAGE AMONG ADOLESCENTS AND YOUNG ADULTS IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2024:00006454-990000000-00833. [PMID: 38621163 DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000004362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
Neisseria meningitidis carriage peaks in adolescents. This secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (NCT03089086) assessing 4CMenB herd protection in South Australia ("B-Part-of-It" study) explored school attributes linked to baseline carriage in 34,489 adolescents prevaccination. Carriage was higher in students attending single-sex [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14-1.93], boarding (aOR: 1.92; 1.13-3.27) and government schools (aOR: 1.32, 1.09-1.61).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassen Mohammed
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital
- Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide
| | | | - Mark McMillan
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital
- Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide
| | - Bing Wang
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital
- Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide
| | - Thomas R Sullivan
- SAHMRI Women and Kids Theme, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Helen S Marshall
- From the Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital
- Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anderson EM, Browne S, Moser CA, Feemster K. College health administrator's perceptions of the impacts of COVID-19 on college immunization programs. JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH : J OF ACH 2023:1-8. [PMID: 37713306 DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2023.2239364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
College immunization policies vary. To evaluate the landscape of college immunization programs, we distributed a 45-item survey to college health administrators between July and September 2021. Items measured perceptions of institutionally recommended and required vaccines, enforcement strategies, barriers to vaccine uptake, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Of 566 invitations sent, only 66 college health administrators completed the survey (11.7% response rate). The majority of participating institutions (89%) required at least one vaccine, with measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) being the most commonly required (83%). Geographic region, school type, or size was not significantly correlated with immunization policies but state-level political leanings were. Common barriers to vaccine program implementation identified by respondents included student-based and institutional concerns. The COVID-19 pandemic was described as both exacerbating existing immunization program barriers and providing opportunities to strengthen programs. Future work will evaluate identified themes in a larger study population and monitor change in perceptions over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M Anderson
- Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Region 3, US Department of Health and Human Services, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Safa Browne
- Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Charlotte A Moser
- Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kristen Feemster
- Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ellingson MK, Bednarczyk RA, O’Leary ST, Schwartz JL, Shapiro ED, Niccolai LM. Understanding the Factors Influencing Health Care Provider Recommendations about Adolescent Vaccines: A Proposed Framework. J Behav Med 2023; 46:356-365. [PMID: 35194726 PMCID: PMC8862696 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-022-00296-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Health care provider recommendations are among the most important factors influencing parents' decisions to vaccinate their adolescents. However, delivery of high-quality health care provider recommendations for vaccination is not universal. There is wide variation in the strength, timeliness and consistency of the delivery of recommendations for all adolescent vaccines. The factors that influence health care providers' recommendations are multi-level and can be conceptualized in much the same way as vaccine acceptance among parents. Health care providers are influenced by their own attitudes and beliefs about a vaccine and also by the patient they are treating and by the community in which they practice as well as state and national level vaccine policy. We propose a multi-level framework for understanding the factors that influence health care providers' recommendations at the individual, interpersonal and community level to both develop and adapt interventions to improve providers' recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mallory K. Ellingson
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale University School of Public Health, 60 College St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| | - Robert A. Bednarczyk
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA
- Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Sean T. O’Leary
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Jason L. Schwartz
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| | - Eugene D. Shapiro
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale University School of Public Health, 60 College St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| | - Linda M. Niccolai
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale University School of Public Health, 60 College St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cai B, Peyrani P, Beeslaar J, Burman C, Balmer P. Modeling persistence of hSBA titers over time following a primary series and a booster dose of MenB-FHbp. Vaccine 2023; 41:2729-2733. [PMID: 37024411 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
MenB-FHbp is a meningococcal serogroup B vaccine. Persistence of hSBA titers against 4 diverse test strains ≤ 4 years after a 2-dose MenB-FHbp primary series and ≤ 26 months after a booster dose administered 4 years post-primary has been demonstrated. Here, we developed a power law model (PLM) to estimate the persistence of hSBA titers up to 5 years after a MenB-FHbp primary series and a booster dose using hSBA data from previous MenB-FHbp clinical trials in healthy adolescents. The PLM-predicted hSBA titers closely followed observed values after a 0, 6 month MenB-FHbp primary series and a booster dose 4 years later. At 5 years post-primary and 5 years post-booster, the PLM predicted that 15.2 %-50.0 % and 51.2 %-70.9 % of individuals, respectively, would have hSBA titers ≥ 1:8 or 1:16. The PLM supports that the persistence of hSBA titers is maintained for at least 5 years post-primary MenB-FHbp vaccination and post-booster.
Collapse
|
5
|
Hicks KA, Ghaswalla P, Carrico J, Anderson S, Novy P, Hogea C, Hayney MS. Estimating the cost of university-based outbreaks of serogroup B meningococcal disease with different pre-matriculation vaccination policies in the United States. JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH : J OF ACH 2023:1-10. [PMID: 36701476 DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2163854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Objective: We developed an Excel-based cost calculator to assess the economic burden of university-based Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MenB) outbreaks. Participants: Hypothetical university with 6,354 students. Methods: Total societal costs of outbreak were estimated for three MenB pre-matriculation immunization policies-vaccination required, vaccination recommended, and no vaccine policy-under three different cost assumptions (low/mid-range/high cost). Results: Mid-range cost estimates of an outbreak under "no policy" were $2.60 and $2.70 million (of which 35% were incurred by the university) if targeting all undergraduates for mass vaccination with a two-/three-dose vaccine, respectively. The "required" and "recommended" policies lowered the burden to $2.17-$2.18 million and $2.34-$2.39 million, respectively. For a larger university with 40,000 students, costs were almost $9 million for a two-dose vaccine with "no policy" in place. Conclusions: The economic burden of a university MenB outbreak is substantial, but could be mitigated by a pre-matriculation MenB vaccination requirement or recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A Hicks
- RTI Health Solutions, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | - Justin Carrico
- RTI Health Solutions, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Seri Anderson
- RTI Health Solutions, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Mary S Hayney
- School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Making a Shared Decision on Meningococcal B Vaccine: Provider Feedback on an Educational Tool Developed for Use With Patients. Acad Pediatr 2022; 22:564-572. [PMID: 35081471 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Revised: 12/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2015, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended Meningococcal B vaccination for healthy 16- to 23-year-olds based on shared clinical decision-making between the patient and the provider. There has been some confusion regarding how to implement this recommendation. METHODS Through discussions among the authors, a review of relevant literature, and consultation with vaccine experts, we developed educational materials for providers that included a patient handout to help initiate and guide conversations leading to shared clinical decision-making for the Meningococcal B vaccine. Materials were distributed to 88 health care providers who subsequently completed surveys to evaluate their impressions of the materials and the utility of the materials for clinical practice. RESULTS The survey results from the 88 providers revealed that they valued the materials; 93% percent indicated they would share these materials with colleagues, and 95% agreed or strongly agreed that they would share these materials with patient families. Responses to an open-ended question indicate that some providers initiated discussions regarding the Meningococcal B vaccine in ways that truncated conversation rather than encouraging a shared decision-making process. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the materials developed and implemented for this project support the initiation of, and help standardize provider conversations regarding, Meningococcal B vaccination for healthy adolescents.
Collapse
|
7
|
Marshall GS, Fergie J, Presa J, Peyrani P. Rationale for the Development of a Pentavalent Meningococcal Vaccine: A US-Focused Review. Infect Dis Ther 2022; 11:937-951. [PMID: 35357651 PMCID: PMC8969818 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-022-00609-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
While invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is uncommon, it can result in serious sequelae and even death. In 2018 in the United States, the incidence of IMD per 100,000 people was 0.03 among adolescents 11−15 years of age, 0.10 among persons 16−23 years of age, and 0.83 among infants < 1 year of age. Serogroup B accounted for 86%, 62%, and 66% of cases, respectively, in those age groups. Currently, routine meningococcal vaccination covering serogroups ACWY (MenACWY) is recommended in the United States for all adolescents at 11−12 years of age, with a booster dose at 16 years of age, whereas a meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccine series is recommended for persons 16−23 years of age under the shared clinical decision-making paradigm. The MenACWY vaccination program in adolescents has been successful in reducing disease burden, but does not prevent disease caused by serogroup B, which accounts for more than half of IMD cases. There are currently no approved vaccines that cover all of the most common disease-causing meningococcal serogroups, which are A, B, C, W, and Y. A pentavalent MenABCWY vaccine that is constituted from 2 licensed meningococcal vaccines—MenB-FHbp and MenACWY-TT—is being investigated in healthy persons ≥ 10–25 years of age. The addition of a MenABCWY vaccine is the next natural step in the incremental meningococcal immunization program in the United States to improve protection against the most common serogroup causing IMD, with no increase in the number of immunizations needed. With high uptake, routine use of MenABCWY could reduce IMD cases and associated mortality, the rate of long-term physical and psychosocial sequelae in survivors, and costs associated with controlling outbreaks, particularly on college campuses. A MenABCWY vaccine would also reduce the number of injections required for adolescents, potentially improving compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary S. Marshall
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Norton Children’s and University of Louisville School of Medicine, 571 S. Floyd St, Suite 321, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
| | - Jaime Fergie
- Driscoll Children’s Hospital, Corpus Christi, TX USA
| | - Jessica Presa
- Vaccines Medical Development & Scientific/Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA USA
| | - Paula Peyrani
- Vaccines Medical Development & Scientific/Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Soumahoro L, Abitbol V, Vicic N, Bekkat-Berkani R, Safadi MAP. Meningococcal Disease Outbreaks: A Moving Target and a Case for Routine Preventative Vaccination. Infect Dis Ther 2021; 10:1949-1988. [PMID: 34379309 PMCID: PMC8572905 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-021-00499-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Outbreaks of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) are unpredictable, can be sudden and have devastating consequences. We conducted a non-systematic review of the literature in PubMed (1997-2020) to assess outbreak response strategies and the impact of vaccine interventions. Since 1997, IMD outbreaks due to serogroups A, B, C, W, Y and X have occurred globally. Reactive emergency mass vaccination campaigns have encompassed single institutions (schools, universities) through to whole sections of the population at regional/national levels (e.g. serogroup B outbreaks in Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean region, Canada and New Zealand). Emergency vaccination responses to IMD outbreaks consistently incurred substantial costs (expenditure on vaccine supplies, personnel costs and interruption of other programmes). Impediments included the limited pace of transmission of information to parents/communities/healthcare workers; issues around collection of informed consents; poor vaccine uptake by older adolescents/young adults, often a target age group; issues of reimbursement, particularly in the USA; and difficulties in swift supply of large quantities of vaccines. For serogroup B outbreaks, the need for two doses was a significant issue that contributed substantially to costs, delayed onset of protection and non-compliance with dose 2. Real-world descriptions of outbreak control strategies and the associated challenges systematically show that reactive outbreak management is administratively, logistically and financially costly, and that its impact can be difficult to measure. In view of the unpredictability, fast pace and potential lethality of outbreak-associated IMD, prevention through routine vaccination appears the most effective mitigation tool. Highly effective vaccines covering five of six disease-causing serogroups are available. Preparedness through routine vaccination programmes will enhance the speed and effectiveness of outbreak responses, should they be needed (ready access to vaccines and need for a single booster dose rather than a primary series).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Marco A P Safadi
- Department of Pediatrics, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hansen CE, Niccolai LM. Factors Associated With Receipt of Meningococcal B Vaccine Among United States Adolescents, National Immunization Survey-Teen, 2017-2018. J Adolesc Health 2021; 69:769-773. [PMID: 34148798 PMCID: PMC8545751 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we evaluated factors associated with receipt of meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccine among adolescents in the United States. METHODS We used public use data files from the National Immunization Survey-Teen from 2017 to 2018. Logistic regression was used to model associations among sociodemographic, healthcare, and vaccination variables of interest and MenB vaccine receipt (≥1 vs. 0 dose). To explore associations between state-level meningococcal vaccination requirements and MenB vaccine uptake, we performed a secondary analysis stratified by presence of a quadrivalent meningococcal (MenACWY) vaccination requirement for secondary school attendance in the adolescent's state of residence (no requirement vs. a one- or two-dose requirement). RESULTS Among 7,288 adolescents, MenB vaccine receipt was significantly associated with up-to-date human papillomavirus (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-2.35) and MenACWY (aOR 5.81, 95% CI 4.14-8.13) vaccination status in multivariable analysis. Adolescents with private insurance were less likely to be vaccinated (aOR .61, 95% CI .46-.79) compared to adolescents with other health insurance types. In secondary analyses, health insurance was no longer significantly associated with MenB vaccine uptake among adolescents in states with a MenACWY requirement. CONCLUSIONS We found that MenB vaccination is associated with receipt of other vaccines recommended for use in adolescents. Adolescents with private health insurance were less likely to be vaccinated against MenB, although state MenACWY requirements appeared to modify the effect of insurance on MenB vaccine receipt. Further work to understand how these factors may influence delivery and acceptance of MenB vaccine can inform interventions and strategies to improve uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin E. Hansen
- Yale School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Linda M. Niccolai
- Yale School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dubey AP, Hazarika RD, Abitbol V, Kolhapure S, Agrawal S. Mass gatherings: a review of the scope for meningococcal vaccination in the Indian context. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:2216-2224. [PMID: 33605845 PMCID: PMC8189129 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1871572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The risk of meningococcal transmission is increased with crowding and prolonged close proximity between people. There have been numerous invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) outbreaks associated with mass gatherings and other overcrowded situations, including cramped accommodation, such as student and military housing, and refugee camps. In these conditions, IMD outbreaks predominantly affect adolescents and young adults. In this narrative review, we examine the situation in India, where the burden of IMD-related complications is significant but the reported background incidence of IMD is low. However, active surveillance for meningococcal disease is suboptimal and laboratory confirmation of meningococcal strain is near absent, especially in non-outbreak periods. IMD risk factors are prevalent, including frequent mass gatherings and overcrowding combined with a demographically young population. Since overcrowded situations are generally unavoidable, the way forward relies on preventive measures. More widespread meningococcal vaccination and strengthened disease surveillance are likely to be key to this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand P Dubey
- Pediatrics, ESI-PGIMSR & Model Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Rashna Dass Hazarika
- Pediatrics, Nemcare Superspeciality Hospital, Bhangagarh, Guwahati, and RIGPA Children's Clinic, Guwahati, India
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Martinón-Torres F, Banzhoff A, Azzari C, De Wals P, Marlow R, Marshall H, Pizza M, Rappuoli R, Bekkat-Berkani R. Recent advances in meningococcal B disease prevention: real-world evidence from 4CMenB vaccination. J Infect 2021; 83:17-26. [PMID: 33933528 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.04.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES 4CMenB is a broadly protective vaccine against invasive meningococcal capsular group B disease (MenB IMD). Licensed worldwide based on immunogenicity and safety data, effectiveness and impact data are now available. We comprehensively reviewed all available real-world evidence gathered from use of 4CMenB since licensure. RESULTS Data from 7 countries provide evidence of effectiveness and impact across different healthcare settings and age-groups, including national/regional immunization programs, observational studies and outbreak control. At least 2 4CMenB doses reduced MenB IMD by 50%-100% in 2-month to 20-year-olds depending on length of follow-up. Estimates of vaccine effectiveness in fully vaccinated cohorts ranged from 59%-100%. The safety profile of 4CMenB administered in real-world settings was consistent with pre-licensure clinical trial data. CONCLUSION MenB IMD is an uncommon but life-threatening disease with unpredictable epidemiology. The substantial body of data demonstrating 4CMenB effectiveness and impact supports its use in IMD prevention. The results reinforce the importance of direct protection of the highest risk groups; infants/young children and adolescents. Direct protection via routine infant immunization with catch-up in young children and routine adolescent vaccination could be the preferred option for MenB disease control. A Video Abstract linked to this article is available on Figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14546790.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Martinón-Torres
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela and University of Santiago, A Choupana, s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | - Chiara Azzari
- University of Florence, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Florence, Italy
| | - Philippe De Wals
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Division of Biological Risks and Occupational Health, Quebec National Public Health Institute (Direction des risques biologiques et de la santé au travail, Institut national de santé publique du Québec), and Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Robin Marlow
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8* 2PS, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Marshall
- VIRTU, Women's and Children's Health Network & Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fergie J, Howard A, Huang L, Srivastava A. Implementation Experience With Meningococcal Serogroup B Vaccines in the United States: Impact of a Nonroutine Recommendation. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2021; 40:269-275. [PMID: 33565815 DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000003033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) is the leading cause of invasive meningococcal disease among US adolescents and young adults, accounting for 62% of cases in 16-23-year-olds in 2018. Since 2015, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has recommended vaccination of healthy adolescents against MenB based on shared clinical decision-making (previously called "Category B" or individual clinical decision-making). However, MenB vaccine coverage and series completion rates remain low. Herein we examine implementation experience of adolescent MenB vaccination in the United States under this nonroutine ACIP recommendation. METHODS PubMed was searched for English-language articles published after 2015 examining MenB vaccination implementation in the United States. Studies reporting MenB vaccination awareness, coverage, knowledge of recommendations and implementation barriers or access disparities were included. RESULTS Identified studies provided evidence that ACIP's MenB vaccination recommendation is poorly understood and prone to misinterpretation by US healthcare providers. Parental awareness of MenB vaccines is low, and racial and socioeconomic disparities exist regarding vaccine receipt. Parents rely on providers to learn about MenB disease risk and benefits of vaccination, with provider recommendations carrying substantial weight in vaccination decisions. CONCLUSIONS Five years of evidence regarding the MenB vaccination implementation experience suggest that the nonstandard recommendation for MenB vaccines is partly responsible for low vaccine coverage. Further, inconsistent implementation of ACIP recommendations could be limiting access to MenB vaccines. Providers need additional support and guidance to implement the shared clinical decision-making recommendation, in turn ensuring equitable access for vaccine-eligible adolescents to enable comprehensive protection against meningococcal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Fergie
- From the Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Driscoll Children's Hospital, Corpus Christi, Texas
| | - Ashley Howard
- Yale School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Liping Huang
- Medical Development & Scientific Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Vaccines, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| | - Amit Srivastava
- Medical Development & Scientific Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Vaccines, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Huang L, Mauskopf J, Farkouh R, Masaquel C. Use of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses for Decisions About Vaccination Programs for Meningococcal Disease in the United States, United Kingdom, The Netherlands, and Canada. Expert Rev Vaccines 2021; 20:59-72. [PMID: 33455487 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1878030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Meningococcal vaccines to protect against invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) vary in terms of vaccine technology and serogroup coverage (Polysaccharide MnACWY, conjugated C and ACWY, outer membrane vesicle-based or protein-based B vaccines), and the national recommendations for each of them vary in terms of target population and number of doses. We sought to understand factors associated with the evolution of meningococcal vaccination program recommendations in four countries with formal evaluation processes: the UK, US, the Netherlands, and Canada. AREAS COVERED A targeted review of published literature and internet sources for the four countries relating to meningococcal vaccination decision-making was conducted. The review focused on the impact of cost-effectiveness analyses on vaccine policy decisions and the extent to which variation in incidence of IMD and its potential catastrophic consequences influenced policy decisions.The evolution of meningococcal vaccine recommendations in the four countries was mainly driven by changes in vaccine availability and changes in serogroup incidence. Public pressure due to the catastrophic nature of IMD influenced recommendations. The role of cost-effectiveness analyses varied across the 4 countries. EXPERT OPINION The value of implementing meningococcal vaccination programs should be assessed using factors beyond those included in traditional cost-effectiveness analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liping Huang
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Collegeville, PA
| | - Josephine Mauskopf
- Health Economics Department, RTI Health Solutions, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ray Farkouh
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Collegeville, PA
| | - Catherine Masaquel
- Market Access and Outcomes Strategy Departments, RTI Health Solutions, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, Research Triangle Park, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chung GS, Hutton DW. Epidemiological impact and cost-effectiveness of universal meningitis b vaccination among college students prior to college entry. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0239926. [PMID: 33035260 PMCID: PMC7546456 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES University students are at significantly higher risk of serogroup B meningococcal (MenB) infection, which can result in debilitating sequelae and excessive healthcare usage. This study aimed to elucidate the impact of universal pre-enrollment vaccination on MenB outbreak probability and the cost-effectiveness in outbreak-only scenarios. METHODS We developed an infectious disease transmission model to determine the number of outbreaks averted under universal vaccination and a Markov model to simulate the costs accrued and QALYs lost associated with infection. The analysis was done on a hypothetical population of 40,000 college students over a four-year time frame. We used the outputs of these two models to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of universal MenB vaccination from a societal perspective. RESULTS We find that the vaccination strategy was estimated to reduce MenB incidence by 63% and outbreak frequency rate by 90%. Under base case assumptions, the ICER of universal vaccination was $748,129 per QALY and in outbreak-only scenarios, it was cost-saving. CONCLUSIONS Universal vaccination is not cost-effective at the current low MenB incidence levels and vaccine price in the U.S., but it is cost-saving if outbreak is imminent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace S. Chung
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - David W. Hutton
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Srivastava A, Dempsey A, Galitsky A, Fahimi M, Huang L. Parental awareness and utilization of meningococcal serogroup B vaccines in the United States. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1109. [PMID: 32664872 PMCID: PMC7362432 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09181-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) is the most common cause of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in the United States. The US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends vaccination of healthy adolescents against MenB based on shared clinical decision-making (Category B recommendation). This survey assessed factors associated with MenB vaccine awareness, utilization, and interest among parents/guardians of US adolescents. Methods Survey participants were identified in 2016 through KnowledgePanel®, an online random sample of US households; population-based weighting methodology was used to ensure data reflected a demographically representative population sample. Adults with ≥1 dependent aged 16–19 years were eligible and completed an online questionnaire. Respondents were grouped in terms of MenB vaccination of their child as: 1) vaccinated, 2) intending to vaccinate, 3) MenB vaccine-unaware, or 4) vaccine-aware but not intending to vaccinate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors influencing MenB vaccine awareness and utilization; univariate analyses used the weighted proportion of each group or weighted means, and multivariate analyses used logistic regression models based on the weighted study sample of each group. Results Six hundred nineteen parents/guardians participated, corresponding to 26,266,700 members of the US population after weighting. MenB vaccine awareness was significantly associated with parent race and sex. Specifically, 57% of parents were unaware of MenB vaccines, and there was significantly higher lack of awareness among males and those of Hispanic or non-White ethnicity. In addition, 36% of unaware parents/guardians were interested in and seeking MenB vaccine information from their healthcare provider (HCP), and there was higher interest among parents of Hispanic ethnicity. ‘Vaccinated/intending to vaccinate’ versus ‘not intending to vaccinate’ and ‘vaccinated’ versus ‘intending to vaccinate’ were both strongly associated with whether an HCP had recommended vaccination (odds ratios, 4.81 [95% CI 2.46, 9.35] and 5.66 [95% CI 2.46, 12.87], respectively). Conclusions Racial and socioeconomic disparities exist in the awareness and utilization of MenB vaccines among parents/guardians of US adolescents. HCP discussion and recommendation are critical catalysts for MenB vaccination and underscore the need to accurately interpret and implement the shared clinical decision-making (Category B) recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Srivastava
- Vaccine Medical Development, Scientific & Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, 300 Technology Square, 3rd Floor, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Liping Huang
- Vaccine Medical Development, Scientific & Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc,, Collegeville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Niccolai LM, Hansen CE. Suboptimal uptake of meningococcal vaccines among older adolescents: Barriers, solutions, and future research directions. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2020; 16:3208-3212. [PMID: 32614695 PMCID: PMC8641614 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1754052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Linda M. Niccolai
- Yale School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Caitlin E. Hansen
- Yale School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Alderfer J, Isturiz RE, Srivastava A. Lessons from mass vaccination response to meningococcal B outbreaks at US universities. Postgrad Med 2020; 132:614-623. [DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2020.1766265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Alderfer
- Medical Development, Scientific & Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Vaccines, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Raul E. Isturiz
- Medical Development, Scientific & Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Vaccines, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Amit Srivastava
- Medical Development, Scientific & Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Vaccines, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Huang L, Goren A, Lee LK, Li VW, Dempsey A, Srivastava A. Disparities in healthcare providers' interpretations and implementations of ACIP's meningococcal vaccine recommendations. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2020; 16:933-944. [PMID: 31634035 PMCID: PMC7227692 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1682845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Revised: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) caused by the bacteria Neisseria meningitidis is rare but potentially fatal. For healthy adolescents, the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends routine vaccination with MenACWY and recommends MenB vaccination under shared clinical decision-making (previously "Category B"). The recommendation for MenB vaccination was the first category B recommendation in adolescents, and it is unclear how healthcare providers (HCPs) implement these guidelines. This 2017 web-based survey of US HCPs explored characteristics associated with prescribing or receiving MenB and MenACWY vaccines, HCP knowledge of vaccine recommendations, and real-world practice patterns. Of 529 respondents, 436 prescribed MenB vaccines to their eligible adolescent/young adult patients and 93 prescribed MenACWY vaccines only. MenB vaccine prescribers were more likely to be pediatricians compared with MenACWY vaccine only prescribers, and patients who received MenB vaccines were more likely to be non-Hispanic whites living in shared spaces (eg, college dormitories) than those not receiving the vaccine. Seventy-seven percent of HCPs indicated that they prescribe MenACWY vaccines consistently with ACIP recommendations (to all members of an age group), whereas only 7% indicated that they prescribe MenB vaccines consistently with ACIP recommendations (individual clinical decision making). Patient-related factors, disease-related factors, and guidelines all influenced HCP decisions to prescribe meningococcal vaccines. Providing HCPs with clear guidance on how to initiate discussion of MenB vaccines with patients and their caregivers may aid in fully protecting US adolescents against meningococcal disease caused by 5 of the disease-causing serogroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liping Huang
- Vaccine Medical Development, Scientific & Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Amir Goren
- Real World Evidence, Kantar Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lulu K. Lee
- Real World Evidence, Kantar Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vicky W. Li
- Real World Evidence, Kantar Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amanda Dempsey
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Amit Srivastava
- Vaccine Medical Development, Scientific & Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Alderfer JT, Moran MM, Srivastava A, Isturiz RE. Meningococcal vaccination: a discussion with all adolescents, whether college-bound or not. Postgrad Med 2019; 131:551-554. [PMID: 31575310 DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2019.1671667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Adolescents and young adults are the primary reservoirs and transmitters of meningococci. In the US, meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) disease predominates over A, C, W, and Y; ACIP-recommended MenACWY and MenB vaccines are available. We investigated invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) burden and vaccination among non-college adolescents.Methods: IMD incidence by college attendance status and vaccination rates were analyzed using publicly available surveillance data.Results: 64/158 IMD cases occurred in non-college 18-24-year-olds during 2015-2017. Among non-college cases, the MenACWY vaccination rates were 38%-57% vs 90%-100% among college cases when vaccination status was known; MenB vaccination was 0% vs 0%-7%, respectively. In 2018, 17.2% of all 17-year-olds received ≥1 dose of multidose MenB vaccines; ≤50% completed the series.Conclusion: Meningococcal vaccination is emphasized for college-bound adolescents, but non-college adolescents bear much of the disease burden. Low vaccine receipt preserves their risk, underscoring the need to protect all adolescents through vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine T Alderfer
- Pfizer Vaccines Medical Development & Scientific and Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Mary M Moran
- Pfizer Vaccines Medical Development & Scientific and Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Amit Srivastava
- Pfizer Vaccines Medical Development & Scientific and Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Raul E Isturiz
- Pfizer Vaccines Medical Development & Scientific and Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|