SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH

Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: is the promise real?

Recent advances in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) have significantly enhanced its application in ART, providing critical insights into embryo viability, and potentially reducing both the time spent in fertility treatments and the risk of pregnancy loss. With the integration of next-generation sequencing, PGT-A now offers greater diagnostic precision, although challenges related to segmental aneuploidies and mosaicism remain. The emergence of non-invasive PGT-A (niPGT-A), which analyzes DNA in spent embryo culture media, promises a simpler aneuploidy screening method. This mini review assesses the methodological criteria for test validation, the current landscape of PGT-A, and the potential of niPGT-A, while evaluating its advantages and potential pitfalls. It underscores the importance of a robust three-phase validation process to ensure the clinical reliability of PGT-A. Despite initial encouraging data, niPGT-A not only confronts issues of DNA amplification failure and diagnostic inaccuracies but also has yet to meet the three-prong criteria required for appropriate test validation, necessitating further research for its clinical adoption. The review underscores that niPGT-A, like traditional PGT-A, must attain the high standards of precision and reliability expected of any genetic testing platform used in clinical settings before it can be adopted into routine ART protocols.

Genomic aspects in reproductive medicine

Infertility is a complex disease characterized by extreme genetic heterogeneity, compounded by various environmental factors. While there are exceptions, individual genetic and genomic variations related to infertility are typically rare, often family-specific, and may serve as susceptibility factors rather than direct causes of the disease. Consequently, identifying the cause of infertility and developing prevention and treatment strategies based on these factors remain challenging tasks, even in the modern genomic era. In this review, we first examine the genetic and genomic variations associated with infertility, and subsequently summarize the concepts and methods of preimplantation genetic testing in light of advances in genome analysis technology.

Preimplantation chromosomal mosaics, chimaeras and confined placental mosaicism

Some human preimplantation embryos are chromosomally mosaic. For technical reasons, estimates of the overall frequency vary widely from <15 to >90% and the true frequency remains unknown. Aneuploid/diploid and aneuploid/aneuploid mosaics typically arise during early cleavage stages before the embryonic genome is fully activated and when cell cycle checkpoints are not operating normally. Other mosaics include chaotic aneuploid mosaics and mixoploids, some of which arise by abnormal chromosome segregation at the first cleavage division. Chimaeras are similar to mosaics, in having two genetically distinct cell populations, but they arise from more than one zygote and occur less often. After implantation, the frequency of mosaic embryos declines to about 2% and most are trisomic/diploid mosaics, with trisomic cells confined to the placenta. Thus, few babies are born with chromosomal mosaicism. This review discusses the origin of different types of chromosomal mosaics and chimaeras; their fate and the relationship between preimplantation chromosomal mosaicism and confined placental mosaicism in human conceptuses and animal models. Abnormal cells in mosaic embryos may be depleted by cell death, other types of cell selection or cell correction but the most severely affected mosaic embryos probably die. Trisomic cells could become restricted to placental lineages if cell selection or correction is less effective in placental lineages and/or they are preferentially allocated to a placental lineage. However, the relationship between preimplantation mosaicism and confined placental mosaicism may be complex because the specific chromosome(s) involved will influence whether chromosomally abnormal cells survive predominately in the placental trophoblast and/or placental mesenchyme.

Lay summary

Human cells normally have 23 pairs of chromosomes, which carry the genes. During the first few days of development, some human embryos are chromosomal mosaics. These mosaic embryos have both normal cells and cells with an abnormal number of chromosomes, which arise from the same fertilised egg. (More rarely, the different cell populations arise from more than one fertilised egg and these embryos are called chimaeras.) If chromosomally abnormal cells survive to term, they could cause birth defects. However, few abnormal cells survive and those that do are usually confined to the placenta, where they are less likely to cause harm. It is not yet understood how this restriction occurs but the type of chromosomal abnormality influences which placental tissues are affected. This review discusses the origin of different types of chromosomally abnormal cells, their fate and how they might become confined to the placenta in humans and animal models.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)-a single-center experience

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and nature of human embryonic aneuploidy based on the preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), the distribution of aneuploidy across the individual chromosomes, and their relationship to maternal age.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single center. The study includes subjects who opted for PGT-A in their in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle from 2016 to 2020. PGT-A was performed on 1501 embryos from 488 patients in 535 cycles. PGT-A was performed using NGS-based technique on Ion Torrent PGM (Life Technologies). Analysis was performed to determine the (i) frequency of the aneuploidy, (ii) the chromosome most commonly affected, (iii) relationship between maternal age and the rate of aneuploidy, and (iv) incidence of segmental aneuploidy.

RESULTS

The overall frequency of aneuploidy was observed to be 46.8%. The incidence of aneuploidy rate was ~ 28% at maternal age < 30 years which steadily increased to ~ 67% in women above 40 years. High frequency of aneuploidy was observed in chromosomes 16, 22, 21, and 15. Segmental abnormalities, involving loss or gain of chromosomal fragments, were observed at a frequency of 5.3%, and highest incidence of segmental gain was observed on the q-arm of chromosome 9.

CONCLUSION

The study provides important information regarding the frequency of the aneuploidy in IVF cohort and the most frequent chromosomal abnormality. The study further emphasizes the relationship between maternal age and aneuploidy. This study has important implications which help clinicians and genetic counselors in providing information in patient counseling.

Role of the sperm, oocyte, and embryo in recurrent pregnancy loss

Disorders affecting the sperm, oocyte, or embryo may cause a significant fraction of spontaneous miscarriages and cases of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Altered chromosomal integrity of sperm and oocytes, which is highly dependent of the age of the mother, represents a major cause of miscarriage and in turn RPL. Avoiding transfers of abnormal embryos is possible with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. Chromosomal anomalies may also be caused by structural rearrangements of one or several chromosomes in either parents, a finding encountered in 12% of couples with RPL, including in those who have had one or several healthy babies. More than 40% of these chromosomal rearrangements are identifiable on regular karyotypes. When abnormal findings are made, preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders allows selection of disease-free embryos. Finally, asymmetric inactivation of the X chromosome has been found more commonly in women with RPL, but no specific treatment is currently available.

Experience analysing over 190,000 embryo trophectoderm biopsies using a novel FAST-SeqS preimplantation genetic testing assay

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is FAST-SeqS an accurate methodology for preimplantation genetic testing for whole-chromosome aneuploidy (PGT-A)? What additional types of chromosomal abnormalities can be assessed? What are the observed aneuploidy rates in a large clinical cohort?

DESIGN

FAST-SeqS, a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assay amplifying genome-wide LINE1 repetitive sequences, was validated using reference samples. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Clinically derived trophectoderm biopsies submitted for PGT-A were assessed, and aneuploidy and mosaicism rates among biopsies were determined. Clinician-provided outcome rates were calculated.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity were over 95% for all aneuploidy types tested in the validation. Comparison of FAST-SeqS with VeriSeq showed high concordance (98.5%). Among embryos with actionable results (n = 182,827), 46.2% were aneuploid. Whole-chromosome aneuploidies were most observed (72.9% without or 8.7% with a segmental aneuploidy), with rates increasing with egg age; segmental aneuploidy rates did not. Segmental aneuploidy (n = 20,557) was observed on all chromosomes (most commonly deletions), with frequencies associated with chromosome length. Mosaic-only abnormalities constituted 10.1% (n = 3862/38145) of samples. Abnormal ploidy constituted 1.8% (n = 2370/128,991) of samples, triploidy being the most common (73.6%). Across 3297 frozen embryo transfers, the mean clinical pregnancy rate was 62% (range 38-80%); the mean combined ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate was 57% (range 38-72%).

CONCLUSION

FAST-SeqS is a clinically reliable and scalable method for PGT-A, is comparable to whole-genome amplification-based platforms, and detects additional information related to ploidy using SNP analysis. Results suggest ongoing benefit of PGT-A using FAST-SeqS, consistent with other platforms.

Comprehensive preimplantation genetic testing by massively parallel sequencing

STUDY QUESTION

Can whole genome sequencing (WGS) offer a relatively cost-effective approach for embryonic genome-wide haplotyping and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for monogenic disorders (PGT-M), aneuploidy (PGT-A) and structural rearrangements (PGT-SR)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Reliable genome-wide haplotyping, PGT-M, PGT-A and PGT-SR could be performed by WGS with 10× depth of parental and 4× depth of embryonic sequencing data.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Reduced representation genome sequencing with a genome-wide next-generation sequencing haplarithmisis-based solution has been verified as a generic approach for automated haplotyping and comprehensive PGT. Several low-depth massively parallel sequencing (MPS)-based methods for haplotyping and comprehensive PGT have been developed. However, an additional family member, such as a sibling, or a proband, is required for PGT-M haplotyping using low-depth MPS methods.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

In this study, 10 families that had undergone traditional IVF-PGT and 53 embryos, including 13 embryos from two PGT-SR families and 40 embryos from eight PGT-M families, were included to evaluate a WGS-based method. There were 24 blastomeres and 29 blastocysts in total. All embryos were used for PGT-A. Karyomapping validated the WGS results. Clinical outcomes of the 10 families were evaluated.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A blastomere or a few trophectoderm cells from the blastocyst were biopsied, and multiple displacement amplification (MDA) was performed. MDA DNA and bulk DNA of family members were used for library construction. Libraries were sequenced, and data analysis, including haplotype inheritance deduction for PGT-M and PGT-SR and read-count analysis for PGT-A, was performed using an in-house pipeline. Haplotyping with a proband and parent-only haplotyping without additional family members were performed to assess the WGS methodology. Concordance analysis between the WGS results and traditional PGT methods was performed.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

For the 40 PGT-M and 53 PGT-A embryos, 100% concordance between the WGS and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-array results was observed, regardless of whether additional family members or a proband was included for PGT-M haplotyping. For the 13 embryos from the two PGT-SR families, the embryonic balanced translocation was detected and 100% concordance between WGS and MicroSeq with PCR-seq was demonstrated.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The number of samples in this study was limited. In some cases, the reference embryo for PGT-M or PGT-SR parent-only haplotyping was not available owing to failed direct genotyping.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

WGS-based PGT-A, PGT-M and PGT-SR offered a comprehensive PGT approach for haplotyping without the requirement for additional family members. It provided an improved complementary method to PGT methodologies, such as low-depth MPS- and SNP array-based methods.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This research was supported by the research grant from the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC0910201 and 2018YFC1004900), the Guangdong province science and technology project of China (2019B020226001), the Shenzhen Birth Defect Screening Project Lab (JZF No. [2016] 750) and the Shenzhen Municipal Government of China (JCYJ20170412152854656). This work was also supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771638, 81901495 and 81971344), the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1004901 and 2016YFC0905103), the Shanghai Sailing Program (18YF1424800), the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Science and Technology Program (15411964000) and the Shanghai 'Rising Stars of Medical Talent' Youth Development Program Clinical Laboratory Practitioners Program (201972). The authors declare no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

An overview of the current and emerging platforms for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) in in vitro fertilization programs

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) and PGT for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) have currently been used widely, aiming to improve IVF outcomes. Although with many years of unsatisfactory results, PGT-A has been revived because new technologies have been adopted, such as platforms to examine all 24 types of chromosomes in blastocysts. This report compiles current knowledge regarding the available PGT platforms, including quantitative PCR, array CGH, and next-generation sequencing. The diagnostic capabilities of are compared and respective advantages/disadvantages outlined. We also address the limitations of current technologies, such as assignment of embryos with balanced translocation. We also discuss the emerging novel PGT technologies that likely will change our future practice, such as non-invasive PGT examining spent culture medium. Current literature suggest that most platforms can effectively reach concordant results regarding whole-chromosome ploidy status of all 24 types of chromosomes. However, different platforms have different resolutions and experimental complexities; leading to different turnaround time, throughput and differential capabilities of detecting mosaicism, segmental mutations, unbalanced translocations, concurrent PGT-A and PGT-M etc. Based on these information, IVF staff can more appropriately interpret PGT data and counsel patients, and select suitable platforms to meet personalized needs. The present report also concisely discusses some crucial clinical outcomes by PGT, which can clarify the role of applying PGT in daily IVF programs. Finally the up-to-date information about the novel use of current technologies and the newly emerging technologies will also help identify the focus areas for the design of new platforms for PGT in the future.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for the Prenatal Diagnosis in Fetuses with Nasal Bone Hypoplasia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Previous studies have shown a strong correlation between fetal nasal bone hypoplasia and chromosomal anomaly; however, there is little knowledge on the associations of fetal nasal bone hypoplasia with chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications until now. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is a high-resolution molecular genetic tool that is effective to detect submicroscopic anomalies including chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications that cannot be detected by karyotyping. This study aimed to examine the performance of CMA for the prenatal diagnosis of nasal bone hypoplasia in the second and third trimesters.

Subjects and Methods

A total of 84 pregnant women in the second and third trimesters with fetal nasal bone hypoplasia, as revealed by ultrasound examinations, were enrolled, and all women underwent karyotyping and CMA with the Affymetrix CytoScan 750K GeneChip Platform. The subjects included 32 cases with fetal nasal bone hypoplasia alone and 52 cases with fetal nasal bone hypoplasia combined with other ultrasound abnormalities, and the prevalence of genomic abnormality was compared between these two groups.

Results

Karyotyping detected 21 cases of chromosomal anomaly in the 84 study subjects (21/84, 25%), including trisomy 21 (14 cases), trisomy 18 (3 cases), 46, del (4)(p16) karyotype (2 cases), 47, XYY syndrome (1 case) and 46, XY, del (5) (p15) karyotype (1 case). CMA detected additional four fetuses with pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) and six fetuses with uncertain clinical significance (VOUS). No significant difference was detected in the prevalence of genomic abnormality in fetuses with nasal bone hypoplasia alone and in combination with other ultrasound abnormalities (13/32 vs 18/52; χ² = 0.31, P > 0.05). The pregnancy was terminated in 21 fetuses detected with chromosomal abnormality and 4 fetuses detected with pathogenic CNVs. Among the other six fetuses detected with VOUS, the parents chose to continue the pregnancy, and the newborns all had normal clinical phenotypes.

Conclusion

In addition to chromosomal abnormalities identified in 21 fetuses by karyotyping, CMA detected additional 10 fetuses with abnormal CNVs (10/84, 11.9%) in the study population. CMA is a promising powerful tool for prenatal diagnosis that may provide valuable data for the accurate assessment of fetal prognosis and the decision of pregnancy continuation during the prenatal clinical counseling.

Genome-wide abnormalities in embryos: Origins and clinical consequences

Ploidy or genome-wide chromosomal anomalies such as triploidy, diploid/triploid mixoploidy, chimerism, and genome-wide uniparental disomy are the cause of molar pregnancies, embryonic lethality, and developmental disorders. While triploidy and genome-wide uniparental disomy can be ascribed to fertilization or meiotic errors, the mechanisms causing mixoploidy and chimerism remain shrouded in mystery. Different models have been proposed, but all remain hypothetical and controversial, are deduced from the developmental persistent genomic constitutions present in the sample studied and lack direct evidence. New single-cell genomic methodologies, such as single-cell genome-wide haplotyping, provide an extended view of the constitution of normal and abnormal embryos and have further pinpointed the existence of mixoploidy in cleavage-stage embryos. Based on those recent findings, we suggest that genome-wide anomalies, which persist in fetuses and patients, can for a large majority be explained by a noncanonical first zygotic cleavage event, during which maternal and paternal genomes in a single zygote, segregate to different blastomeres. This process, termed heterogoneic division, provides an overarching theoretical basis for the different presentations of mixoploidy and chimerism.

The Reproductive Journey in the Genomic Era: From Preconception to Childhood

It is estimated that around 10–15% of the population have problems achieving a pregnancy. Assisted reproduction techniques implemented and enforced by personalized genomic medicine have paved the way for millions of infertile patients to become parents. Nevertheless, having a baby is just the first challenge to overcome in the reproductive journey, the most important is to obtain a healthy baby free of any genetic condition that can be prevented. Prevention of congenital anomalies throughout the lifespan of the patient must be a global health priority. Congenital disorders can be defined as structural or functional anomalies that occur during intrauterine life and can be identified prenatally, at birth, or sometimes may only be detected later during childhood. It is considered a frequent group of disorders, affecting 3–6% of the population, and one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. Congenital anomalies can represent up to 30–50% of infant mortality in developed countries. Genetics plays a substantial role in the pathogenesis of congenital anomalies. This becomes especially important in some ethnic communities or populations where the incidence and levels of consanguinity are higher. The impact of genetic disorders during childhood is high, representing 20–30% of all infant deaths and 11.1% of pediatric hospital admissions. With these data, obtaining a precise genetic diagnosis is one of the main aspects of a preventive medicine approach in developed countries. The field of reproductive health has changed dramatically from traditional non-molecular visual microscope-based techniques (i.e., fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or G-banding karyotype), to the latest molecular high-throughput techniques such as next-generation sequencing (NGS). Genome-wide technologies are applied along the different stages of the reproductive health lifecycle from preconception carrier screening and pre-implantation genetic testing, to prenatal and postnatal testing. The aim of this paper is to assess the new horizon opened by technologies such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), in new strategies, as a genomic precision diagnostic tool to understand the mechanisms underlying genetic conditions during the “reproductive journey”.

Genetic Counseling and Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Despite the ever-increasing number of patients undergoing fertility treatments and the expanded use of genetic testing in this context, there has been limited focus in the literature on the involvement of genetics professionals in the assisted reproductive technology (ART) setting. Here we discuss the importance of genetic counseling within reproductive medicine. We review how genetic testing of embryos is performed, the process of gamete donation, the challenges associated with genetic testing, and the complexities of genetic test result interpretation.

Characteristics of the IVF Cycle that Contribute to the Incidence of Mosaicism

Highly sensitive next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms applied to preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) allow the classification of mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies. However, the incidence of mosaicism reported by these tests can be affected by a wide number of analytical, biological, and clinical factors. With the use of a proprietary algorithm for automated diagnosis of aneuploidy and mosaicism, we retrospectively analyzed a large series of 115,368 trophectoderm biopsies from 27,436 PGT-A cycles to determine whether certain biological factors and in vitro fertilization (IVF) practices influence the incidence of overall aneuploidy, whole uniform aneuploidy, mosaicism, and TE biopsies with only segmental aneuploidy. Older female and male patients showed higher rates of high-mosaic degree and whole uniform aneuploidies and severe oligozoospermic patients had higher rates of mosaicism and only segmental aneuploidies. Logistic regression analysis identified a positive effect of female age but a negative effect of embryo vitrification on the incidence of overall aneuploid embryos. Female age increased whole uniform aneuploidy rates but decreased only segmental aneuploidy and mosaicism, mainly low-mosaics. Conversely, higher ovarian response decreased whole uniform aneuploidy rates but increased only segmental aneuploidies. Finally, embryo vitrification decreased whole uniform aneuploidy rates but increased mosaicism, mainly low-mosaics, compared to PGT-A cycles with fresh oocytes. These results could be useful for clinician’s management of the IVF cycles.

Necessity is the mother of invention and the evolutionary force driving the success of in vitro fertilization

During the last few decades, millions of healthy children have been born with the aid of in vitro fertilization (IVF). This success belies the fact that IVF treatment is comprised of a complex series of interventions starting with a customized control ovarian stimulation protocol. This is followed by the induction of oocyte maturation, the retrieval of mature oocytes and in vitro fertilization, which often involves the microinjection of a single sperm into the oocyte. After fertilization, the resulting embryos are cultured for up to 7 days. The best embryos are transferred into the uterus where the embryo implants and hopefully develops into a healthy child. However, frequently the best embryos are biopsied and frozen. The biopsied cells are analyzed to identify those embryos without chromosomal abnormalities. These embryos are eventually thawed and transferred with pregnancy rates as good if not better than embryos that are not biopsied and transferred in a fresh cycle. Thus, IVF treatment requires the coordinated efforts of physicians, nurses, molecular biologists and embryologists to conduct each of these multifaceted phases in a seamless and flawless manner. Even though complex, IVF treatment may seem routine today, but it was not always the case. In this review the evolution of human IVF is presented as a series of innovations that resolved a technical hurdle in one component of IVF while creating challenges that eventually lead to the next major advancement. This step-by-step evolution in the treatment of human infertility is recounted in this review.

Multi-centre evaluation of a comprehensive preimplantation genetic test through haplotyping-by-sequencing

STUDY QUESTION

Can reduced representation genome sequencing offer an alternative to single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays as a generic and genome-wide approach for comprehensive preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M), aneuploidy (PGT-A) and structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) in human embryo biopsy samples?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Reduced representation genome sequencing, with OnePGT, offers a generic, next-generation sequencing-based approach for automated haplotyping and copy-number assessment, both combined or independently, in human single blastomere and trophectoderm samples.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Genome-wide haplotyping strategies, such as karyomapping and haplarithmisis, have paved the way for comprehensive PGT, i.e. leveraging PGT-M, PGT-A and PGT-SR in a single workflow. These methods are based upon SNP array technology.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This multi-centre verification study evaluated the concordance of PGT results for a total of 225 embryos, including 189 originally tested for a monogenic disorder and 36 tested for a translocation. Concordance for whole chromosome aneuploidies was also evaluated where whole genome copy-number reference data were available. Data analysts were kept blind to the results from the reference PGT method.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Leftover blastomere/trophectoderm whole genome amplified (WGA) material was used, or secondary trophectoderm biopsies were WGA. A reduced representation library from WGA DNA together with bulk DNA from phasing references was processed across two study sites with the Agilent OnePGT solution. Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq500 system, and data were analysed with Agilent Alissa OnePGT software. The embedded PGT-M pipeline utilises the principles of haplarithmisis to deduce haplotype inheritance whereas both the PGT-A and PGT-SR pipelines are based upon read-count analysis in order to evaluate embryonic ploidy. Concordance analysis was performed for both analysis strategies against the reference PGT method.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

PGT-M analysis was performed on 189 samples. For nine samples, the data quality was too poor to analyse further, and for 20 samples, no result could be obtained mainly due to biological limitations of the haplotyping approach, such as co-localisation of meiotic crossover events and nullisomy for the chromosome of interest. For the remaining 160 samples, 100% concordance was obtained between OnePGT and the reference PGT-M method. Equally for PGT-SR, 100% concordance for all 36 embryos tested was demonstrated. Moreover, with embryos originally analysed for PGT-M or PGT-SR for which genome-wide copy-number reference data were available, 100% concordance was shown for whole chromosome copy-number calls (PGT-A).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Inherent to haplotyping methodologies, processing of additional family members is still required. Biological limitations caused inconclusive results in 10% of cases.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Employment of OnePGT for PGT-M, PGT-SR, PGT-A or combined as comprehensive PGT offers a scalable platform, which is inherently generic and thereby, eliminates the need for family-specific design and optimisation. It can be considered as both an improvement and complement to the current methodologies for PGT.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

Agilent Technologies, the KU Leuven (C1/018 to J.R.V. and T.V.) and the Horizon 2020 WIDENLIFE (692065 to J.R.V. and T.V). H.M. is supported by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO, 11A7119N). M.Z.E, J.R.V. and T.V. are co-inventors on patent applications: ZL910050-PCT/EP2011/060211- WO/2011/157846 'Methods for haplotyping single cells' and ZL913096-PCT/EP2014/068315 'Haplotyping and copy-number typing using polymorphic variant allelic frequencies'. T.V. and J.R.V. are co-inventors on patent application: ZL912076-PCT/EP2013/070858 'High-throughput genotyping by sequencing'. Haplarithmisis ('Haplotyping and copy-number typing using polymorphic variant allelic frequencies') has been licensed to Agilent Technologies. The following patents are pending for OnePGT: US2016275239, AU2014345516, CA2928013, CN105874081, EP3066213 and WO2015067796. OnePGT is a registered trademark. D.L., J.T. and R.L.R. report personal fees during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work from Agilent Technologies. S.H. and K.O.F. report personal fees and other during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work from Agilent Technologies. J.A. reports personal fees and other during the conduct of the study from Agilent Technologies and personal fees from Agilent Technologies and UZ Leuven outside the submitted work. B.D. reports grants from IWT/VLAIO, personal fees during the conduct of the study from Agilent Technologies and personal fees and other outside the submitted work from Agilent Technologies. In addition, B.D. has a patent 20160275239 - Genetic Analysis Method pending. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): status and future challenges

The world's first in vitro fertilization (IVF) baby was born in July 1978 in the UK. Since then, more than 7 million infants have been born worldwide as a result of IVF. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was introduced in the late 1980s for couples at risk of transmitting a genetic abnormality to their children. From the mid-1990s, this technology has been employed as an embryo selection tool for patients undergoing IVF and has been known as preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). The aim of this practice has been to identify and select euploid embryos for transfer, in order to increase efficacy of IVF cycle, ensure higher implantation rates or at least decreased time to pregnancy. In the early days, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technology was used for genetic analysis. New advancements in both biopsy and cytogenetic have made possible the improvement of PGD and PGT-A analysis. Currently, a variety of technologies have been implemented to individuate euploid embryos to be preferentially transferred in IVF treatments. The purpose of this review is to clarify the differences between PGD and PGT-A, and to discuss current indications and requirements for embryo biopsy and genetic methodologies used.

Non-invasive pre-implantation genetic testing of human embryos: an emerging concept

The accurate genetic screening of pre-implantation embryos currently entails the use of technically challenging and biologically invasive biopsies of the human embryos. Investigating a more conservative sampling approach has emerged as a timely and desired alternative. Circulating cell-free embryonic DNA is present in the blastocoel fluid and spent culture media of blastocysts, and this has lately been sought as an attractive source of genetic information. The genetic analysis of cell-free embryonic DNA has been reported, to be useful in evaluating the genetic constitution of embryos; thus, providing a potential alternative to conventional biopsy-derived pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT). In this review, we have summarized these non-invasive alternative applications of PGT and discussed their current limitations and future clinical implications.

Origin and composition of cell-free DNA in spent medium from human embryo culture during preimplantation development

STUDY QUESTION

What is the origin and composition of cell-free DNA in human embryo spent culture media?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Cell-free DNA from human embryo spent culture media represents a mix of maternal and embryonic DNA, and the mixture can be more complex for mosaic embryos.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In 2016, ~300 000 human embryos were chromosomally and/or genetically analyzed using preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) or monogenic disorders (PGT-M) before transfer into the uterus. While progress in genetic techniques has enabled analysis of the full karyotype in a single cell with high sensitivity and specificity, these approaches still require an embryo biopsy. Thus, non-invasive techniques are sought as an alternative.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This study was based on a total of 113 human embryos undergoing trophectoderm biopsy as part of PGT-A analysis. For each embryo, the spent culture media used between Day 3 and Day 5 of development were collected for cell-free DNA analysis. In addition to the 113 spent culture media samples, 28 media drops without embryo contact were cultured in parallel under the same conditions to use as controls. In total, 141 media samples were collected and divided into two groups: one for direct DNA quantification (53 spent culture media and 17 controls), the other for whole-genome amplification (60 spent culture media and 11 controls) and subsequent quantification. Some samples with amplified DNA (N = 56) were used for aneuploidy testing by next-generation sequencing; of those, 35 samples underwent single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sequencing to detect maternal contamination. Finally, from the 35 spent culture media analyzed by SNP sequencing, 12 whole blastocysts were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to determine the level of mosaicism in each embryo, as a possible origin for discordance between sample types.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Trophectoderm biopsies and culture media samples (20 μl) underwent whole-genome amplification, then libraries were generated and sequenced for an aneuploidy study. For SNP sequencing, triads including trophectoderm DNA, cell-free DNA, and follicular fluid DNA were analyzed. In total, 124 SNPs were included with 90 SNPs distributed among all autosomes and 34 SNPs located on chromosome Y. Finally, 12 whole blastocysts were fixed and individual cells were analyzed by FISH using telomeric/centromeric probes for the affected chromosomes.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

We found a higher quantity of cell-free DNA in spent culture media co-cultured with embryos versus control media samples (P ≤ 0.001). The presence of cell-free DNA in the spent culture media enabled a chromosomal diagnosis, although results differed from those of trophectoderm biopsy analysis in most cases (67%). Discordant results were mainly attributable to a high percentage of maternal DNA in the spent culture media, with a median percentage of embryonic DNA estimated at 8%. Finally, from the discordant cases, 91.7% of whole blastocysts analyzed by FISH were mosaic and 75% of the analyzed chromosomes were concordant with the trophectoderm DNA diagnosis instead of the cell-free DNA result.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study was limited by the sample size and the number of cells analyzed by FISH.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This is the first study to combine chromosomal analysis of cell-free DNA, SNP sequencing to identify maternal contamination, and whole-blastocyst analysis for detecting mosaicism. Our results provide a better understanding of the origin of cell-free DNA in spent culture media, offering an important step toward developing future non-invasive karyotyping that must rely on the specific identification of DNA released from human embryos.

STUDY FUNDING/ COMPETING INTEREST

This work was funded by Igenomix S.L. There are no competing interests.

Past, Present, and Future Strategies for Enhanced Assessment of Embryo's Genome and Reproductive Competence in Women of Advanced Reproductive Age

Recent advancements in genomic analysis allow testing of an increasing number of genetic features in human preimplantation embryos. Typical single gene mutation and whole chromosomes testing can now be integrated with assessment of mitochondrial DNA and polygenic conditions. Diagnostic expansion into epigenetic and transcriptomic assessment in the near future are potential technological targets which may improve the prognostic outlook of patients of advanced reproductive age and overall in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment outcomes. In this review, we discuss the technological progress of recent years and their future applications in preimplantation genetic testing in IVF.

Frequencies of chromosome-specific mosaicisms in trophoectoderm biopsies detected by next-generation sequencing

OBJECTIVE

To examine the chromosome-specific frequencies of mosaicism detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) compared with constitutional aneuploidy.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional review of NGS results from trophectoderm biopsies analyzed by per-chromosome prevalence of mosaicism and constitutional aneuploidy.

SETTING

Private fertility clinic.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 378 patients who underwent preimplantation genetic screening by NGS for routine clinical indications from February 2016 to April 2017.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Aneuploidies and mosaicisms were tabulated per chromosome, and whole-chromosome and segmental mosaicisms were also analyzed.

RESULT(S)

NGS results were analyzed from 1,547 blastocysts. Mosaicism was detected as the sole abnormality in 17.5% (n = 270) of samples but were also found in 196/634 aneuploid embryos, so the overall incidence of mosaicism per biopsy was 30.1%. Mosaicism did not statistically vary when stratified by maternal age. The mean rate of overall mosaicism per chromosome was 2.46%. When whole chromosome and segmental mosaicisms were compared, unequal frequencies were found in several chromosomes. Trisomy was more frequently detected as whole-chromosome mosaicism, although monosomy was more frequently seen in segmental mosaicism. Aneuploidy and mosaicism displayed different patterns of distribution in various chromosomes.

CONCLUSION(S)

Mosaicism is unequally detected in various chromosomes and appears distinct from the distribution pattern of constitutional aneuploidy. Whole chromosome and segmental mosaicisms are also differentially detected. These results contribute to the study of mosaicism, illuminating a differential pattern of detection across the genome.

Preimplantation Genetic Screening with Spent Culture Medium/Blastocoel Fluid for in Vitro Fertilization

Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) detects chromosomal aneuploidy from DNA extracted from trophectodermal biopsy of the embryos before implantation. Although a controlled study showed no difference in pregnancy rates between this invasive cell biopsy technique and a non-biopsied control group, the potential long-term damage by the current PGS method has not be completely ruled out. We therefore tested a less-invasive protocol which utilizes spent culture medium combining with blastocoel fluid (ECB) to assess chromosomal aneuploidy. We compared the new protocol with the currently employed trophectodermal biopsy method against chromosomal information obtained from the remaining embryo. We found that the new technique generated information about aneuploidy that was not entirely identical to obtained from the biopsied trophectoderm or the remaining embryo. As the origins of the DNA extracted from the three sample types were not the same, the significance and interpretation of each result would have its own meaning. The possible implications derived from the ECB results as well as those from cell biopsy were discussed. The effectiveness of this new approach in selecting the best embryo for uterine implantation awaits further long term evaluation.

Detecting mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies: current challenges and future possibilities

Embryonic mosaicism, defined as the presence of karyotypically distinct cell lines within an embryo, has been frequently reported with a high incidence in preimplantation embryos derived from IVF and is thought to be one of the major biological limitations for the routine application of PGD for aneuploidies (PGD-A). The incidence of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos is in fact reported to be between 4 and 90%. However, these data are in sharp contrast with what is known from clinical pregnancies, where true foetal mosaicism is observed in less than 0.5% of cases. Here, we challenge these previous observations in preimplantation embryos, presenting an alternative perspective, which also considers the impact of technical variation to diagnose mosaicism as one possible cause contributing to overestimation of the incidence of mosaicism in embryos. Although euploid/aneuploid mosaicism may be present in blastocysts, the possibility of detecting this phenomenon within a single trophectoderm biopsy represents a contemporary challenge to bring about improvement to the practice of PGD-A. The purpose of this opinion paper is to provide a critical review of the literature, provide a possible alternative interpretation of the data, and discuss future challenges with diagnosing mosaicism in PGD-A cycles.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening: Current status and future challenges

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a clinically feasible technology to prevent the transmission of monogenic inherited disorders in families afflicted the diseases to the future offsprings. The major technical hurdle is it does not have a general formula for all mutations, thus different gene locus needs individualized, customized design to make the diagnosis accurate enough to be applied on PGD, in which the quantity of DNA is scarce, whereas timely result is sometimes requested if fresh embryo transfer is desired. On the other hand, preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) screens embryo with aneuploidy and was also known as PGD-A (A denotes aneuploidy) in order to enhance the implantation rates as well as livebirth rates. In contrasts to PGD, PGS is still under ferocious debate, especially recent reports found that euploid babies were born after transferring the aneuploid embryos diagnosed by PGS back to the womb and only very few randomized trials of PGS are available in the literature. We have been doing PGD and/or PGS for more than 10 years as one of the core PGD/PGS laboratories in Taiwan. Here we provide a concise review of PGD/PGS regarding its current status, both domestically and globally, as well as its future challenges.

Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis

The past decade has seen the development of technologies that have revolutionized prenatal genetic testing; that is, genetic testing from conception until birth. Genome-wide single-cell arrays and high-throughput sequencing analyses are dramatically increasing our ability to detect embryonic and fetal genetic lesions, and have substantially improved embryo selection for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Moreover, both invasive and non-invasive mutation scanning of the genome are helping to identify the genetic causes of prenatal developmental disorders. These advances are changing clinical practice and pose novel challenges for genetic counselling and prenatal care.

Mosaicism in Preimplantation Human Embryos: When Chromosomal Abnormalities Are the Norm

Along with errors in meiosis, mitotic errors during post-zygotic cell division contribute to pervasive aneuploidy in human embryos. Relatively little is known, however, about the genesis of these errors or their fitness consequences. Rapid technological advances are helping to close this gap, revealing diverse molecular mechanisms contributing to mitotic error. These include altered cell cycle checkpoints, aberrations of the centrosome, and failed chromatid cohesion, mirroring findings from cancer biology. Recent studies are challenging the idea that mitotic error is abnormal, emphasizing that the fitness impacts of mosaicism depend on its scope and severity. In light of these findings, technical and philosophical limitations of various screening approaches are discussed, along with avenues for future research.

Assessing the true incidence of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos

Modern technologies applied to the field of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening (PGD-A) have improved the ability to identify the presence of mosaicism. Consequently, new questions can now be addressed regarding the potential impact of embryo mosaicism on diagnosis accuracy and the feasibility of considering mosaic embryos for transfer. The frequency of chromosomal mosaicism in products of conception (POCs) of early miscarriages has been reported to be low. Mosaic embryos with an aneuploid inner cell mass are typically lost during the first trimester owing to spontaneous miscarriages. Most of the mosaics in established pregnancies would derive from placental mosaicism or placental aneuploidy, and mosaic embryos with aneuploid inner cell mass should be lost mainly due to first-trimester spontaneous miscarriages. The well described clinical outcomes of live births from mosaic embryos suggest a wide spectrum of phenotypes, from healthy to severely impaired. Therefore, there is a need to balance the risks of discarding a possibly viable embryo with that of transferring an embryo that may ultimately have a lower implantation potential.

Early human embryos are naturally aneuploid-can that be corrected?

Aneuploidy is common and may be a natural occurrence in early human embryos. Selecting against embryos containing aneuploid cells for embryo transfer has been reported to increase clinical pregnancies per transfer in some studies, but not others. Some aneuploidy is due to misallocation of chromosomes during meiosis, in either the egg or sperm, but most aneuploidy is due to misallocation of chromosomes during mitoses after fertilization. Big questions are as follows: Why does this happen? How much aneuploidy in a preimplantation embryo is compatible with normal fetal development? Is aneuploidy increased by in vitro culture, and/or could it be prevented or corrected in the IVF lab?

Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management

For an IVF clinic that wishes to implement preimplantation genetic diagnosis for monogenic diseases (PGD) and for aneuploidy testing (PGD-A), a global improvement is required through all the steps of an IVF treatment and patient care. At present, CCS (Comprehensive Chromosome Screening)-based trophectoderm (TE) biopsy has been demonstrated as a safe, accurate and reproducible approach to conduct PGD-A and possibly also PGD from the same biopsy. Key challenges in PGD/PGD-A implementation cover genetic and reproductive counselling, selection of the most efficient approach for blastocyst biopsy as well as of the best performing molecular technique to conduct CCS and monogenic disease analysis. Three different approaches for TE biopsy can be compared. However, among them, the application of TE biopsy approaches, entailing the zona opening when the expanded blastocyst stage is reached, represent the only biopsy methods suited with a totally undisturbed embryo culture strategy (time lapse-based incubation in a single media). Moreover, contemporary CCS technologies show a different spectrum of capabilities and limits that potentially impact the clinical outcomes, the management and the applicability of the PGD-A itself. In general, CCS approaches that avoid the use of whole genome amplification (WGA) can provide higher reliability of results with lower costs and turnaround time of analysis. The future perspectives are focused on the scrupulous and rigorous clinical validations of novel CCS methods based on targeted approaches that avoid the use of WGA, such as targeted next-generation sequencing technology, to further improve the throughput of analysis and the overall cost-effectiveness of PGD/PGD-A.

Reanalysis of human blastocysts with different molecular genetic screening platforms reveals significant discordance in ploidy status

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to determine mosaicism and its effect on blastocysts; abnormal blastocysts determined by molecular testing were sequentially biopsied and retested.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We re-biopsied 37 blastocyst-stage abnormal embryos from eight patients, which were reanalyzed to determine the level of concordance between biopsies and inter-laboratory congruence between reputable commercial PGS laboratories.

RESULTS

The main outcome measures were intra-embryo variation between sequential embryo biopsies and inter-laboratory variation between two PGS laboratories. The compatibility between both aCGH and NGS was found to be 11 % (3/27). Importantly, 9/27 (33 %) of embryos originally reported to be aneuploid, upon repeat assessment, were found to be euploid. The concurrence for SNP array and NGS was 50 % (3/6), and 17 % (1/6) of these abnormal embryos tested normal upon re-evaluation with NGS. NGS resulted 41 % (11/27) normal results when 27 of CGH abnormal embryos were retested. Concordance between aCGH and NGS was 4 % (1/27) whereas in three instances, gender discrepancy was observed with NGS when aCGH abnormal embryos were reanalyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of these studies reinforce the prevalence of inconsistencies during PGS evaluation of trophectoderm biopsies possibly due to variations in platform sensitivity and heightening concerns over the clinical tractability of such technology in human ARTs..

Preimplantation genetic screening for all 24 chromosomes by microarray comparative genomic hybridization significantly increases implantation rates and clinical pregnancy rates in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with poor prognosis

CONTEXT

A majority of human embryos produced in vitro are aneuploid, especially in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with poor prognosis. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for all 24 chromosomes has the potential to select the most euploid embryos for transfer in such cases.

AIM

To study the efficacy of PGS for all 24 chromosomes by microarray comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) in Indian couples undergoing IVF cycles with poor prognosis.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

A retrospective, case-control study was undertaken in an institution-based tertiary care IVF center to compare the clinical outcomes of twenty patients, who underwent 21 PGS cycles with poor prognosis, with 128 non-PGS patients in the control group, with the same inclusion criterion as for the PGS group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single cells were obtained by laser-assisted embryo biopsy from day 3 embryos and subsequently analyzed by array CGH for all 24 chromosomes. Once the array CGH results were available on the morning of day 5, only chromosomally normal embryos that had progressed to blastocyst stage were transferred.

RESULTS

The implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate (PR) per transfer were found to be significantly higher in the PGS group than in the control group (63.2% vs. 26.2%, P = 0.001 and 73.3% vs. 36.7%, P = 0.006, respectively), while the multiple PRs sharply declined from 31.9% to 9.1% in the PGS group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, we have shown that PGS by array CGH can improve the clinical outcome in patients undergoing IVF with poor prognosis.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: what technology should you use and what are the differences?

PURPOSE

The purpose of the review was to define the various diagnostic platforms currently available to perform preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and describe in a clear and balanced manner the various strengths and weaknesses of these technologies.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted. We used the terms "preimplantation genetic testing," "preimplantation genetic diagnosis," "preimplantation genetic screening," "preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy," "PGD," "PGS," and "PGD-A" to search through PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar from the year 2000 to April 2016. Bibliographies of articles were also searched for relevant studies. When possible, larger randomized controlled trials were used. However, for some emerging data, only data from meeting abstracts were available.

RESULTS

PGS is emerging as one of the most valuable tools to enhance pregnancy success with assisted reproductive technologies. While all of the current diagnostic platforms currently available have various advantages and disadvantages, some platforms, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), are capable of evaluating far more data points than has been previously possible. The emerging complexity of different technologies, especially with the utilization of more sophisticated tools such as NGS, requires an understanding by clinicians in order to request the best test for their patients..

CONCLUSION

Ultimately, the choice of which diagnostic platform is utilized should be individualized to the needs of both the clinic and the patient. Such a decision must incorporate the risk tolerance of both the patient and provider, fiscal considerations, and other factors such as the ability to counsel patients on their testing results and how these may or may not impact clinical outcomes.

Developmental potential of clinically discarded human embryos and associated chromosomal analysis

Clinically discarded human embryos, which are generated from both normal and abnormal fertilizations, have the potential of developing into blastocysts. A total of 1,649 discarded human embryos, including zygotes containing normal (2PN) and abnormal (0PN, 1PN, 3PN and ≥4PN) pronuclei and prematurely cleaved embryos (2Cell), were collected for in vitro culture to investigate their developmental potential and chromosomal constitution using an SNP array-based chromosomal analysis. We found that blastocyst formation rates were 63.8% (for 2Cell embryos), 22.6% (2PN), 16.7% (0PN), 11.2% (3PN) and 3.6% (1PN). SNP array-based chromosomal analysis of the resultant blastocysts revealed that the percentages of normal chromosomes were 55.2% (2Cell), 60.7% (2PN), 44.4% (0PN) and 47.4% (0PN). Compared with clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) data generated with clinically acceptable embryos, results of the SNP array-based chromosome analysis on blastocysts from clinically discarded embryos showed similar values for the frequency of abnormal chromosome occurrence, aberrant signal classification and chromosomal distribution. The present study is perhaps the first systematic analysis of the developmental potential of clinically discarded embryos and provides a basis for future studies.

Chromosomal analysis of blastocysts from balanced chromosomal rearrangement carriers

Balanced chromosomal rearrangements (CRs) are among the most common genetic abnormalities in humans. In the present study, we have investigated the degree of consistency between the chromosomal composition of the blastocyst inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE) in carriers with balanced CR, which has not been previously addressed. As a secondary aim, we have also evaluated the validity of cleavage-stage preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) based on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of blastocysts from CR carriers. Blastocyst ICM and TE were screened for chromosomal aneuploidy and imbalance of CR-associated chromosomes based on whole-genome copy number variation analysis by low-coverage next-generation sequencing (NGS) following single-cell whole-genome amplification by multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycling. The NGS results were analyzed without knowledge of cleavage-stage FISH results. NGS results for blastocyst ICM and TE from CR carriers were 86.49% (32/37) consistent. Of the 1702 (37×46) chromosomes examined, 99.47% (1693/1702) showed consistency. However, only 40.0% (18/45) of all embryos had consistent results for chromosomes involved in CR, as determined by blastocyst NGS and cleavage-stage FISH. Of the 85 CR-affected chromosomes analyzed by FISH, 37.65% (32/85) were incongruous with NGS results, with 87.5% (28/32) showing imbalanced composition by FISH but balanced composition by NGS. These results indicate that chromosomal composition of blastocyst ICM and TE in balanced CR carriers is highly consistent, and that PGD based on cleavage-stage FISH is inaccurate; therefore, using blastocyst TE biopsies for NGS-based PGD is recommended for identifying chromosomal imbalance in embryos from balanced CR carriers.

A pilot proof-of-principle study to compare fresh and vitrified cycle preimplantation genetic screening by chromosome microarray and next generation sequencing

BACKGROUND

Single embryo transfer (SET) has been utilized as a strategy to reduce the chance of multifetal gestations in in vitro fertilization (IVF) but lower pregnancy rate remains a concern. Recent studies showed that favorable outcome regarding SET can be achieved by selecting embryos with "more normal" genetic components. We explored the use of rapid array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to select blastocysts for fresh SET and compared with the protocols adopting vitrified (ultrarapidly frozen) embryo transfer cycle. Validation of the rapid protocol of aCGH and comparison of the result with the regular protocol of aCGH and next generation sequencing (NGS) are also performed.

RESULTS

First-time IVF patients with normal karyotype (n = 21) were enrolled for elective fresh SET cycle (n = 8; designated as fresh SET group) or vitrified embryo transfer cycle (n = 13; designated as vitrified ET group) coupling with comprehensive chromosomal screening by a 9-h rapid aCGH from Day 5 trophectoderm (TE) biopsy. In fresh SET group, 86 blastocysts (10.8 blastocysts/patient) were biopsied and analyzed. Aneuploidy was detected in 53.5 % (46/86) of the biopsied blastocysts. All patients had a single embryo transferred on the following day. The clinical pregnancy rate was 87.5 % (7/8) and the ongoing pregnancy rate was 62.5 % (5/8). In vitrified ET group, 58 blastocysts (4.5 blastocysts/patient) were biopsied and 56 blastocysts were analyzed. Aneuploidy was detected in 39.3 % (22/56) of biopsies. The patients accepted for SET or double embryos transfer (DET) in non-stimulated cycles. The clinical pregnancy rate and the ongoing pregnancy rate was 76.9 % (10/13) and 53.8 % (7/13) respectively. Spontaneous abortions occurred in both of the two patient groups. In the series of fresh SET group, no twin pregnancy was noted and at least one healthy baby had been born at gestational age (GA) 37(+6) weeks when submission. The results of PGS by rapid aCGH, regular aCGH and NGS were comparable in most occasions.

CONCLUSION

This study evaluates the use of rapid aCGH to select blastocysts for fresh SET and demonstrates its feasibility in a real clinical IVF program. A successful livebirth is achieved and the favorable outcome is superior to the protocol adopting vitrified ET cycle in our own setting. Additional studies are needed to verify this pilot data and validate its application in large randomized trials.

Aneuploidy screening by array comparative genomic hybridization improves success rates of in vitro fertilization: A multicenter Indian study

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the usefulness of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in the Indian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

This is a retrospective, multicenter study including 235 PGS cycles following intracytoplasmic sperm injection performed at six different infertility centers from September 2013 to June 2015. Patients were divided as per maternal age in several groups (<35, 35–36, 37–38, 39–40, and >40 years) and as per indication for undergoing PGS. Indications for performing PGS were recurrent miscarriage, repetitive implantation failure, severe male factor, previous trisomic pregnancy, and advanced maternal age (≥35). Day 3 embryo biopsy was performed and analyzed by aCGH followed by day 5 embryo transfer in the same cycle or the following cycle. Outcomes such as pregnancy rates (PRs)/transfer, implantation rates, miscarriage rates, percentage of abnormal embryos, and number of embryos with more than one aneuploidy and chaotic patterns were recorded for all the treated subjects based on different age and indication groups.

RESULTS:

aCGH helped in identifying aneuploid embryos, thus leading to consistent implantation (range: 33.3%–42.9%) and PRs per transfer (range: 31.8%–54.9%) that were obtained for all the indications in all the age groups, after performing PGS.

CONCLUSION:

Aneuploidy is one of the major factors which affect embryo implantation. aCGH can be successfully employed for screening of aneuploid embryos. When euploid embryos are transferred, an increase in PRs can be achieved irrespective of the age or the indication.

Omics in Reproductive Medicine: Application of Novel Technologies to Improve the IVF Success Rate

Treatment for many infertile couples often consists of in vitro fertilization (IVF) but an estimated 70% of IVF cycles fail to produce a live birth. In an attempt to improve the live birth rate, the vast majority of IVF cycles performed in the United States involve the transfer of multiple embryos, a practice that increases the risk of multiple gestation pregnancy. This is a concern because multiple gestation pregnancies are associated with an increased incidence of maternal and fetal complications and significant cost associated with the care of preterm infants. As the ideal outcome of each IVF cycle is the birth of a single healthy baby, significant effort has focused on identifying embryos with the greatest developmental potential. To date, selection of euploid embryos using comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) is the most promising approach while metabolomic and proteomic assessment of spent culture medium have the potential to noninvasively assess embryo viability. Endometrial gene expression profiling may help determine the optimal time to perform embryo transfer. While CCS has been implemented in some clinics, further development and optimization will be required before analysis of spent culture medium and endometrial gene expression profiling make the transition to clinical use. This review will describe efforts to identify embryos with the greatest potential to result in a healthy, live birth, with a particular emphasis on detection of embryo aneuploidy and metabolic profiling of spent embryo culture medium. Assessment of endometrial receptivity to identify the optimal time to perform embryo transfer will also be discussed.

Confirmation rates of array-CGH in day-3 embryo and blastocyst biopsies for preimplantation genetic screening

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the confirmation rate of day-3 embryo biopsy (blastomere) and trophectoderm biopsy using array-comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) technology.

METHODS

A blinded study was conducted to re-analyse 109 embryos previously diagnosed as chromosomally abnormal by array-CGH. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) was performed using array-CGH on day 3 (n = 50) or day 5 (n = 59). Partial chromosome gains or losses were excluded (n=6), and only whole chromosome aneuploidies were considered. Re-analysis of whole blastocysts was carried out following the same array-CGH protocol used for PGS.

RESULTS

The PGS result was confirmed in the whole blastocyst in (a) 49/50 (98 %) abnormal embryos after day-3 biopsy and (b) 57/59 (96.6 %) abnormal embryos after trophectoderm biopsy. One embryo (1/50; 2 %) was diagnosed as abnormal, with monosomy 18, on day 3, and software analysis of the whole blastocyst gave a euploid result; however, a mosaic pattern was observed for monosomy 18 in the whole blastocyst. Two trophectoderm biopsy cases (3.4 %) did not have the abnormalities (trisomy 7, and trisomy 1 and 4, respectively) verified in the whole embryo. Concordance rates for both biopsy strategies and for individual chromosomes were evaluated by Fisher's exact test and showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Both types of biopsies showed similar high concordance rates with whole blastocyst results. Therefore, regarding the confirmation rates shown in this work, day-3 embryo biopsies can be representative of the whole embryo and both types of biopsy can be used for clinical analysis in PGS following the described array-CGH protocol.

A Euploid Line of Human Embryonic Stem Cells Derived from a 43,XX,dup(9q),+12,-14,-15,-18,-21 Embryo

Aneuploid embryos diagnosed by FISH-based preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) have been shown to yield euploid lines of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) with a relatively high frequency. Given that the diagnostic procedure is usually based on the analysis of 1–2 blastomeres of 5 to 10-cell cleavage-stage embryos, mosaicism has been a likely explanation for the phenomena. However, FISH-based PGS can have a significant rate of misdiagnosis, and therefore some of those lines may have been derived from euploid embryos misdiagnosed as aneuploid. More recently, coupling of trophectoderm (TE) biopsy at the blastocyst stage and array-CGH lead to a more informative form of PGS. Here we describe the establishment of a new line of hESCs from an embryo with a 43,XX,dup(9q),+12,-14,-15,-18,-21 chromosomal content based on array-CGH of TE biopsy. We show that, despite the complex chromosomal abnormality, the corresponding hESC line BR-6 is euploid (46,XX). Single nucleotide polymorphism analysis showed that the embryo´s missing chromosomes were not duplicated in BR-6, suggesting the existence of extensive mosaicism in the TE lineage.

Evidence of Selection against Complex Mitotic-Origin Aneuploidy during Preimplantation Development

Whole-chromosome imbalances affect over half of early human embryos and are the leading cause of pregnancy loss. While these errors frequently arise in oocyte meiosis, many such whole-chromosome abnormalities affecting cleavage-stage embryos are the result of chromosome missegregation occurring during the initial mitotic cell divisions. The first wave of zygotic genome activation at the 4-8 cell stage results in the arrest of a large proportion of embryos, the vast majority of which contain whole-chromosome abnormalities. Thus, the full spectrum of meiotic and mitotic errors can only be detected by sampling after the initial cell divisions, but prior to this selective filter. Here, we apply 24-chromosome preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) to 28,052 single-cell day-3 blastomere biopsies and 18,387 multi-cell day-5 trophectoderm biopsies from 6,366 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. We precisely characterize the rates and patterns of whole-chromosome abnormalities at each developmental stage and distinguish errors of meiotic and mitotic origin without embryo disaggregation, based on informative chromosomal signatures. We show that mitotic errors frequently involve multiple chromosome losses that are not biased toward maternal or paternal homologs. This outcome is characteristic of spindle abnormalities and chaotic cell division detected in previous studies. In contrast to meiotic errors, our data also show that mitotic errors are not significantly associated with maternal age. PGS patients referred due to previous IVF failure had elevated rates of mitotic error, while patients referred due to recurrent pregnancy loss had elevated rates of meiotic error, controlling for maternal age. These results support the conclusion that mitotic error is the predominant mechanism contributing to pregnancy losses occurring prior to blastocyst formation. This high-resolution view of the full spectrum of whole-chromosome abnormalities affecting early embryos provides insight into the cytogenetic mechanisms underlying their formation and the consequences for human fertility.

The Influence of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Microarray-Based Molecular Karyotype on Preimplantation Embryonic Development Potential

In order to investigate the influence of the molecular karyotype based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray on embryonic development potential in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data generated by PGD using embryos retrieved from parents with chromosome rearrangements in our center. In total, 929 embryos from 119 couples had exact diagnosis and development status. The blastocyst formation rate of balanced molecular karyotype embryos was 56.6% (276/488), which was significantly higher than that of genetic imbalanced embryos 24.5% (108/441) (P<0.001). No significant difference was detected in blastocyst formation rates in the groups of maternal age <30, 30-35 and >35 respectively. Blastocyst formation rates of male and female embryos were 44.5% (183/411) and 38.8% (201/518) respectively, with no significant difference between them (P>0.05). The rates of balanced molecular karyotype embryos vary from groups of embryos with different cell numbers at 68 hours after insemination. The blastocyst formation rate of embryos with 6-8 cells (48.1%) was significantly higher than that of embryos with <6 cells (23.9%) and with >8 cells (42.9%) (P<0.05). As for the unbalanced embryos, there was no significant difference of the distribution of abnormal molecular karyotypes in the subgroup of the arrest, morula and blastocyst. Thus, we conclude that embryos with balanced molecular karyotype have significant higher development potential than those with imbalanced molecular karyotype whilst maternal age, embryo gender and types of abnormal molecular karyotype have no significant influence on blastocyst formation. Compared with embryos with <6 and >8 cells, embryos with 6-8 blastomeres have higher rate of balanced molecular karyotype and blastocyst formation.

Technical Update: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening

OBJECTIVE

To update and review the techniques and indications of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS).

OPTIONS

Discussion about the genetic and technical aspects of preimplantation reproductive techniques, particularly those using new cytogenetic technologies and embryo-stage biopsy.

OUTCOMES

Clinical outcomes of reproductive techniques following the use of PGD and PGS are included. This update does not discuss in detail the adverse outcomes that have been recorded in association with assisted reproductive technologies.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of The Cochrane Library and Medline in April 2014 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (aneuploidy, blastocyst/physiology, genetic diseases, preimplantation diagnosis/methods, fertilization in vitro) and key words (e.g., preimplantation genetic diagnosis, preimplantation genetic screening, comprehensive chromosome screening, aCGH, SNP microarray, qPCR, and embryo selection). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies published from 1990 to April 2014. There were no language restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the update to January 2015. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

VALUES

The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. (Table 1) BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: This update will educate readers about new preimplantation genetic concepts, directions, and technologies. The major harms and costs identified are those of assisted reproductive technologies.

SUMMARY

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis is an alternative to prenatal diagnosis for the detection of genetic disorders in couples at risk of transmitting a genetic condition to their offspring. Preimplantation genetic screening is being proposed to improve the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization by screening for embryonic aneuploidy. Though FISH-based PGS showed adverse effects on IVF success, emerging evidence from new studies using comprehensive chromosome screening technology appears promising. Recommendations 1. Before preimplantation genetic diagnosis is performed, genetic counselling must be provided by a certified genetic counsellor to ensure that patients fully understand the risk of having an affected child, the impact of the disease on an affected child, and the benefits and limitations of all available options for preimplantation and prenatal diagnosis. (III-A) 2. Couples should be informed that preimplantation genetic diagnosis can reduce the risk of conceiving a child with a genetic abnormality carried by one or both parents if that abnormality can be identified with tests performed on a single cell or on multiple trophectoderm cells. (II-2B) 3. Invasive prenatal or postnatal testing to confirm the results of preimplantation genetic diagnosis is encouraged because the methods used for preimplantation genetic diagnosis have technical limitations that include the possibility of a false result. (II-2B) 4. Trophectoderm biopsy has no measurable impact on embryo development, as opposed to blastomere biopsy. Therefore, whenever possible, trophectoderm biopsy should be the method of choice in embryo biopsy and should be performed by experienced hands. (I-B) 5. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of single-gene disorders should ideally be performed with multiplex polymerase chain reaction coupled with trophectoderm biopsy whenever available. (II-2B) 6. The use of comprehensive chromosome screening technology coupled with trophectoderm biopsy in preimplantation genetic diagnosis in couples carrying chromosomal translocations is recommended because it is associated with favourable clinical outcomes. (II-2B) 7. Before preimplantation genetic screening is performed, thorough education and counselling must be provided by a certified genetic counsellor to ensure that patients fully understand the limitations of the technique, the risk of error, and the ongoing debate on whether preimplantation genetic screening is necessary to improve live birth rates with in vitro fertilization. (III-A) 8. Preimplantation genetic screening using fluorescence in situ hybridization technology on day-3 embryo biopsy is associated with decreased live birth rates and therefore should not be performed with in vitro fertilization. (I-E) 9. Preimplantation genetic screening using comprehensive chromosome screening technology on blastocyst biopsy, increases implantation rates and improves embryo selection in IVF cycles in patients with a good prognosis. (I-B).

Genome-wide uniparental disomy screen in human discarded morphologically abnormal embryos

Uniparental disomy (UPD) has been shown to be rare in human normal blastocysts, but its frequency in discarded morphologically abnormal embryos and its relevance to embryonic self-correction of aneuploid remains unknown. The aim of this study was to detect UPD in discarded morphologically abnormal embryos. Both discarded morphologically abnormal embryos, including zero-pronuclear zygotes (0PN), one-pronuclear zygotes (1PN), three-pronuclear zygotes (3PN) and 2PN embryos scored as low development potential were cultured into blastocysts then underwent trophectoderm biopsy. Genome-wide UPD screening of the trophectoderm of 241 discarded morphologically abnormal embryo sourced blastocysts showed that UPD occurred in nine embryos. Five embryos exhibited UPDs with euploid chromosomes, and four displayed UPDs with chromosomal aneuploid. The percentage of UPDs among the morphologically abnormal sourced blastocysts was 3.73%, which is significant higher than the percentage observed in normal blastocysts. The frequency of UPD in 3PN-sourced blastocysts was 7.69%, which is significantly higher than that in normal blastocysts. This study provides the first systematic genome-wide profile of UPD in discarded morphologically abnormal embryos. Our results indicated that UPD may be a common phenomenon in discarded morphologically abnormal embryos and may be relevant to human embryonic self-correction.