The histone H3K36 demethylase Rph1/KDM4 regulates the expression of the photoreactivation gene PHR1

2-Hydroxyglutarate modulates histone methylation at specific loci and alters gene expression via Rph1 inhibition

2-Hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) is an oncometabolite that accumulates in certain cancers. Gain-of-function mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase lead to 2-HG accumulation at the expense of alpha-ketoglutarate. Elevated 2-HG levels inhibit histone and DNA demethylases, causing chromatin structure and gene regulation changes with tumorigenic consequences. We investigated the effects of elevated 2-HG levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a yeast devoid of DNA methylation and heterochromatin-associated histone methylation. Our results demonstrate genetic background-dependent gene expression changes and altered H3K4 and H3K36 methylation at specific loci. Analysis of histone demethylase deletion strains indicated that 2-HG inhibits Rph1 sufficiently to induce extensive gene expression changes. Rph1 is the yeast homolog of human KDM4 demethylases and, among the yeast histone demethylases, was the most sensitive to the inhibitory effect of 2-HG in vitro. Interestingly, Rph1 deficiency favors gene repression and leads to further down-regulation of already silenced genes marked by low H3K4 and H3K36 trimethylation, but abundant in H3K36 dimethylation. Our results provide novel insights into the genome-wide effects of 2-HG and highlight Rph1 as its preferential demethylase target.

Carcinogenesis promotion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: KDM4A complex-mediated gene transcriptional suppression by LEF1

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most prevalent cancer of the mouth, characterised by rapid progression and poor prognosis. Hence, an urgent need exists for the development of predictive targets for early diagnosis, prognosis determination, and clinical therapy. Dysregulation of lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1), an important transcription factor involved in the Wnt-β-catenin pathway, contributes to the poor prognosis of OSCC. Herein, we aimed to explore the correlation between LEF1 and histone lysine demethylase 4 A (KDM4A). Results show that the KDM4A complex is recruited by LEF1 and specifically binds the LATS2 promoter region, thereby inhibiting its expression, and consequently promoting cell proliferation and impeding apoptosis in OSCC. We also established NOD/SCID mouse xenograft models using CAL-27 cells to conduct an in vivo analysis of the roles of LEF1 and KDM4A in tumour growth, and our findings show that cells stably suppressing LEF1 or KDM4A have markedly decreased tumour-initiating capacity. Overall, the results of this study demonstrate that LEF1 plays a pivotal role in OSCC development and has potential to serve as a target for early diagnosis and treatment of OSCC.

The role of histone H3K36me3 writers, readers and erasers in maintaining genome stability

Histone Post-Translational Modifications (PTMs) play fundamental roles in mediating DNA-related processes such as transcription, replication and repair. The histone mark H3K36me3 and its associated methyltransferase SETD2 (Set2 in yeast) are archetypical in this regard, performing critical roles in each of these DNA transactions. Here, we present an overview of H3K36me3 regulation and the roles of its writers, readers and erasers in maintaining genome stability through facilitating DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair, checkpoint signalling and replication stress responses. Further, we consider how loss of SETD2 and H3K36me3, frequently observed in a number of different cancer types, can be specifically targeted in the clinic through exploiting loss of particular genome stability functions.

Ready, SET, Go: Post-translational regulation of the histone lysine methylation network in budding yeast

Histone lysine methylation is a key epigenetic modification that regulates eukaryotic transcription. Here, we comprehensively review the function and regulation of the histone methylation network in the budding yeast and model eukaryote, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. First, we outline the lysine methylation sites that are found on histone proteins in yeast (H3K4me1/2/3, H3K36me1/2/3, H3K79me1/2/3, and H4K5/8/12me1) and discuss their biological and cellular roles. Next, we detail the reduced but evolutionarily conserved suite of methyltransferase (Set1p, Set2p, Dot1p, and Set5p) and demethylase (Jhd1p, Jhd2p, Rph1p, and Gis1p) enzymes that are known to control histone lysine methylation in budding yeast cells. Specifically, we illustrate the domain architecture of the methylation enzymes and highlight the structural features that are required for their respective functions and molecular interactions. Finally, we discuss the prevalence of post-translational modifications on yeast histone methylation enzymes and how phosphorylation, acetylation, and ubiquitination in particular are emerging as key regulators of enzyme function. We note that it will be possible to completely connect the histone methylation network to the cell's signaling system, given that all methylation sites and cognate enzymes are known, most phosphosites on the enzymes are known, and the mapping of kinases to phosphosites is tractable owing to the modest set of protein kinases in yeast. Moving forward, we expect that the rich variety of post-translational modifications that decorates the histone methylation machinery will explain many of the unresolved questions surrounding the function and dynamics of this intricate epigenetic network.

Post-translational modification analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone methylation enzymes reveals phosphorylation sites of regulatory potential

Histone methylation is central to the regulation of eukaryotic transcription. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, it is controlled by a system of four methyltransferases (Set1p, Set2p, Set5p, and Dot1p) and four demethylases (Jhd1p, Jhd2p, Rph1p, and Gis1p). While the histone targets for these enzymes are well characterized, the connection of the enzymes with the intracellular signaling network and thus their regulation is poorly understood; this also applies to all other eukaryotes. Here we report the detailed characterization of the eight S. cerevisiae enzymes and show that they carry a total of 75 phosphorylation sites, 92 acetylation sites, and two ubiquitination sites. All enzymes are subject to phosphorylation, although demethylases Jhd1p and Jhd2p contained one and five sites respectively, whereas other enzymes carried 14 to 36 sites. Phosphorylation was absent or underrepresented on catalytic and other domains but strongly enriched for regions of disorder on methyltransferases, suggesting a role in the modulation of protein-protein interactions. Through mutagenesis studies, we show that phosphosites within the acidic and disordered N-terminus of Set2p affect H3K36 methylation levels in vivo, illustrating the functional importance of such sites. While most kinases upstream of the yeast histone methylation enzymes remain unknown, we model the possible connections between the cellular signaling network and the histone-based gene regulatory system and propose an integrated regulatory structure. Our results provide a foundation for future, detailed exploration of the role of specific kinases and phosphosites in the regulation of histone methylation.

An optogenetic switch for the Set2 methyltransferase provides evidence for transcription-dependent and -independent dynamics of H3K36 methylation

Histone H3 lysine 36 methylation (H3K36me) is a conserved histone modification associated with transcription and DNA repair. Although the effects of H3K36 methylation have been studied, the genome-wide dynamics of H3K36me deposition and removal are not known. We established rapid and reversible optogenetic control for Set2, the sole H3K36 methyltransferase in yeast, by fusing the enzyme with the light-activated nuclear shuttle (LANS) domain. Light activation resulted in efficient Set2-LANS nuclear localization followed by H3K36me3 deposition in vivo, with total H3K36me3 levels correlating with RNA abundance. Although genes showed disparate levels of H3K36 methylation, relative rates of H3K36me3 accumulation were largely linear and consistent across genes, suggesting that H3K36me3 deposition occurs in a directed fashion on all transcribed genes regardless of their overall transcription frequency. Removal of H3K36me3 was highly dependent on the demethylase Rph1. However, the per-gene rate of H3K36me3 loss weakly correlated with RNA abundance and followed exponential decay, suggesting H3K36 demethylases act in a global, stochastic manner. Altogether, these data provide a detailed temporal view of H3K36 methylation and demethylation that suggests transcription-dependent and -independent mechanisms for H3K36me deposition and removal, respectively.

Rph1 coordinates transcription of ribosomal protein genes and ribosomal RNAs to control cell growth under nutrient stress conditions

Coordinated regulation of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) synthesis and ribosomal protein gene (RPG) transcription by eukaryotic RNA polymerases (RNAP) is a key requirement for growth control. Although evidence for balance between RNPI-dependent 35S rRNA production and RNAPII-mediated RPG transcription have been described, the molecular basis is still obscure. Here, we found that Rph1 modulates the transcription status of both rRNAs and RPGs in yeast. We show that Rph1 widely associates with RNAPI and RNAPII-transcribed genes. Deletion of RPH1 remarkably alleviates cell slow growth caused by TORC1 inhibition via derepression of rRNA and RPG transcription under nutrient stress conditions. Mechanistically, Rim15 kinase phosphorylates Rph1 upon rapamycin treatment. Phosphorylation-mimetic mutant of Rph1 exhibited more resistance to rapamycin treatment, decreased association with ribosome-related genes, and faster cell growth compared to the wild-type, indicating that Rph1 dissociation from chromatin ensures cell survival upon nutrient stress. Our results uncover the role of Rph1 in coordination of RNA polymerases-mediated transcription to control cell growth under nutrient stress conditions.

Emerging roles of histone modifications and HDACs in RNA splicing

Histone modifications and RNA splicing, two seemingly unrelated gene regulatory processes, greatly increase proteome diversity and profoundly influence normal as well as pathological eukaryotic cellular functions. Like many histone modifying enzymes, histone deacetylases (HDACs) play critical roles in governing cellular behaviors and are indispensable in numerous biological processes. While the association between RNA splicing and histone modifications is beginning to be recognized, a lack of knowledge exists regarding the role of HDACs in splicing. Recent studies however, reveal that HDACs interact with spliceosomal and ribonucleoprotein complexes, actively control the acetylation states of splicing-associated histone marks and splicing factors, and thereby unexpectedly could modulate splicing. Here, we review the role of histone/protein modifications and HDACs in RNA splicing and discuss the convergence of two parallel fields, which supports the argument that HDACs, and perhaps most histone modifying enzymes, are much more versatile and far more complicated than their initially proposed functions. Analogously, an HDAC-RNA splicing connection suggests that splicing is regulated by additional upstream factors and pathways yet to be defined or not fully characterized. Some human diseases share common underlying causes of aberrant HDACs and dysregulated RNA splicing and, thus, further support the potential link between HDACs and RNA splicing.

Rpd3L Contributes to the DNA Damage Sensitivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Checkpoint Mutants

DNA replication forks that are stalled by DNA damage activate an S-phase checkpoint that prevents irreversible fork arrest and cell death. The increased cell death caused by DNA damage in budding yeast cells lacking the Rad53 checkpoint protein kinase is partially suppressed by deletion of the EXO1 gene. Using a whole-genome sequencing approach, we identified two additional genes, RXT2 and RPH1, whose mutation can also partially suppress this DNA damage sensitivity. We provide evidence that RXT2 and RPH1 act in a common pathway, which is distinct from the EXO1 pathway. Analysis of additional mutants indicates that suppression works through the loss of the Rpd3L histone deacetylase complex. Our results suggest that the loss or absence of histone acetylation, perhaps at stalled forks, may contribute to cell death in the absence of a functional checkpoint.

Genome and Epigenome Surveillance Processes Underlying UV Exposure in Plants

Land plants and other photosynthetic organisms (algae, bacteria) use the beneficial effect of sunlight as a source of energy for the photosynthesis and as a major source of information from the environment. However, the ultraviolet component of sunlight also produces several types of damage, which can affect cellular and integrity, interfering with growth and development. In order to reduce the deleterious effects of UV, photosynthetic organisms combine physiological adaptation and several types of DNA repair pathways to avoid dramatic changes in the structure. Therefore, plants may have obtained an evolutionary benefit from combining genome and surveillance processes, to efficiently deal with the deleterious effects of UV radiation. This review will present the different mechanisms activated upon UV exposure that contribute to maintain genome and integrity.

Gcn5-mediated Rph1 acetylation regulates its autophagic degradation under DNA damage stress

Histone modifiers regulate proper cellular activities in response to various environmental stress by modulating gene expression. In budding yeast, Rph1 transcriptionally represses many DNA damage or autophagy-related gene expression. However, little is known how Rph1 is regulated during these stress conditions. Here, we report that Rph1 is degraded upon DNA damage stress conditions. Notably, this degradation occurs via the autophagy pathway rather than through 26S proteasome proteolysis. Deletion of ATG genes or inhibition of vacuole protease activity compromises Rph1 turnover. We also determine that Rph1 and nuclear export protein Crm1 interact, which is required for Rph1 translocation from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. More importantly, Gcn5 directly acetylates Rph1 in vitro and in vivo, and Gcn5-containing complex, SAGA, is required for autophagic degradation of Rph1. Gcn5-mediated Rph1 acetylation is essential for the association of Rph1 with the nuclear pore protein Nup1. Finally, we show that sustaining high levels of Rph1 during DNA damage stress results in cell growth defects. Thus, we propose that Gcn5-mediated acetylation finely regulates Rph1 protein level and that autophagic degradation of Rph1 is important for cell homeostasis. Our findings may provide a general connection between DNA damage, protein acetylation and autophagy.

Histone modifications in DNA damage response

DNA damage is a relatively common event in eukaryotic cell and may lead to genetic mutation and even cancer. DNA damage induces cellular responses that enable the cell either to repair the damaged DNA or cope with the damage in an appropriate way. Histone proteins are also the fundamental building blocks of eukaryotic chromatin besides DNA, and many types of post-translational modifications often occur on tails of histones. Although the function of these modifications has remained elusive, there is ever-growing studies suggest that histone modifications play vital roles in several chromatin-based processes, such as DNA damage response. In this review, we will discuss the main histone modifications, and their functions in DNA damage response.

KdmA, a histone H3 demethylase with bipartite function, differentially regulates primary and secondary metabolism in Aspergillus nidulans

Aspergillus nidulans kdmA encodes a member of the KDM4 family of jumonji histone demethylase proteins, highly similar to metazoan orthologues both within functional domains and in domain architecture. This family of proteins exhibits demethylase activity towards lysines 9 and 36 of histone H3 and plays a prominent role in gene expression and chromosome structure in many species. Mass spectrometry mapping of A. nidulans histones revealed that around 3% of bulk histone H3 carried trimethylated H3K9 (H3K9me3) but more than 90% of histones carried either H3K36me2 or H3K36me3. KdmA functions as H3K36me3 demethylase and has roles in transcriptional regulation. Genetic manipulation of KdmA levels is tolerated without obvious effect in most conditions, but strong phenotypes are evident under various conditions of stress. Transcriptome analysis revealed that – in submerged early and late cultures – between 25% and 30% of the genome is under KdmA influence respectively. Transcriptional imbalance in the kdmA deletion mutant may contribute to the lethal phenotype observed upon exposure of mutant cells to low‐density visible light on solid medium. Although KdmA acts as transcriptional co‐repressor of primary metabolism genes, it is required for full expression of several genes involved in biosynthesis of secondary metabolites.

Phosphorylation of epigenetic "readers, writers and erasers": Implications for developmental reprogramming and the epigenetic basis for health and disease

Epigenetic reprogramming that occurs during critical periods of development can increase the susceptibility to many diseases in adulthood. Programming of the epigenome during development occurs via the activity of a variety of epigenetic modifiers, including "readers, writers and erasers" of histone methyl marks. Posttranslational modification of these programmers can alter their activity, resulting in global or gene-specific changes in histone methylation and gene transcription. This review summarizes what is currently known about phosphorylation of histone methyltransferases ("writers"), demethylases ("erasers") and effector proteins ("readers) that program the epigenome, and the impact of this posttranslational modification on their activity. Understanding how the activity of these epigenetic programmers is perturbed by environmental exposures via changes in phosphorylation is key to understanding mechanisms of developmental reprogramming and the epigenetic basis of health and disease.

Rph1/KDM4 mediates nutrient-limitation signaling that leads to the transcriptional induction of autophagy

BACKGROUND

Autophagy is a conserved process mediating vacuolar degradation and recycling. Autophagy is highly upregulated upon various stresses and is essential for cell survival in deleterious conditions. Autophagy defects are associated with severe pathologies, whereas unchecked autophagy activity causes cell death. Therefore, to support proper cellular homeostasis, the induction and amplitude of autophagy activity have to be finely regulated. Transcriptional control is a critical, yet largely unexplored, aspect of autophagy regulation. In particular, little is known about the signaling pathways modulating the expression of autophagy-related genes, and only a few transcriptional regulators have been identified as contributing in the control of this process.

RESULTS

We identified Rph1 as a negative regulator of the transcription of several ATG genes and a repressor of autophagy induction. Rph1 is a histone demethylase protein, but it regulates autophagy independently of its demethylase activity. Rim15 mediates the phosphorylation of Rph1 upon nitrogen starvation, which causes an inhibition of its function. Preventing Rph1 phosphorylation or overexpressing the protein causes a severe block in autophagy induction. A similar function of Rph1/KDM4 is seen in mammalian cells, indicating that this process is highly conserved.

CONCLUSION

Rph1 maintains autophagy at a low level in nutrient-rich conditions; upon nutrient limitation, the inhibition of its activity is a prerequisite to the induction of ATG gene transcription and autophagy.

Immediate chromatin immunoprecipitation and on-bead quantitative PCR analysis: a versatile and rapid ChIP procedure

Genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) studies have brought significant insight into the genomic localization of chromatin-associated proteins and histone modifications. The large amount of data generated by these analyses, however, require approaches that enable rapid validation and analysis of biological relevance. Furthermore, there are still protein and modification targets that are difficult to detect using standard ChIP methods. To address these issues, we developed an immediate chromatin immunoprecipitation procedure which we call ZipChip. ZipChip significantly reduces the time and increases sensitivity allowing for rapid screening of multiple loci. Here we describe how ZipChIP enables detection of histone modifications (H3K4 mono- and trimethylation) and two yeast histone demethylases, Jhd2 and Rph1, which were previously difficult to detect using standard methods. Furthermore, we demonstrate the versatility of ZipChIP by analyzing the enrichment of the histone deacetylase Sir2 at heterochromatin in yeast and enrichment of the chromatin remodeler, PICKLE, at euchromatin in Arabidopsis thaliana.

The histone demethylase activity of Rph1 is not essential for its role in the transcriptional response to nutrient signaling

Rph1 and Gis1 are two related yeast zinc finger proteins that function as downstream effectors in the Ras/PKA, TOR and Sch9 nutrient signaling pathways. Both proteins also contain JmjC histone demethylase domains, but only Rph1 is known to be an active enzyme, demethylating lysine 36 of histone H3. We have studied to what extent the demethylase activity of Rph1 contributes to its role in nutrient signaling by performing gene expression microarray experiments on a yeast strain containing a catalytically inactive allele of RPH1. We find that the enzymatic activity of Rph1 is not essential for its role in growth phase dependent gene regulation. However, the ability of Rph1 to both activate and repress transcription is partially impaired in the active site mutant, indicating that the demethylase activity may enhance its function in vivo. Consistent with this, we find that the Rph1 mutation and a deletion of the histone H3 methylase Set2 affect the same target genes in opposite directions. Genes that are differentially expressed in the Rph1 mutant are also enriched for binding of Rpd3, a downstream effector in silencing, to their promoters. The expression of some subtelomeric genes and genes involved in sporulation and meiosis are also affected by the mutation, suggesting a role for Rph1-dependent demethylation in regulating these genes. A small set of genes are more strongly affected by the active site mutation, indicating a more pronounced role for the demethylase activity in their regulation by Rph1.

Live longer on MARS: a yeast paradigm of mitochondrial adaptive ROS signaling in aging

Adaptive responses to stress, including hormesis, have been implicated in longevity, but their mechanisms and outcomes are not fully understood. Here, I briefly summarize a longevity mechanism elucidated in the budding yeast chronological lifespan model by which Mitochondrial Adaptive ROS Signaling (MARS) promotes beneficial epigenetic and metabolic remodeling. The potential relevance of MARS to the human disease Ataxia-Telangiectasia and as a potential anti-aging target is discussed.

Dissociation of the H3K36 demethylase Rph1 from chromatin mediates derepression of environmental stress-response genes under genotoxic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The H3K36 demethylase Rph1 is a transcriptional repressor for stress-responsive genes in yeast. Rph1-mediated transcriptional repression is relieved by phosphorylation of Rph1, reduced Rph1 level, and dissociation of Rph1 from chromatin with genotoxic stress. Rph1 may function as a regulatory node in different stress-signaling pathways.

Cells respond to environmental signals by altering gene expression through transcription factors. Rph1 is a histone demethylase containing a Jumonji C (JmjC) domain and belongs to the C₂H₂ zinc-finger protein family. Here we investigate the regulatory network of Rph1 in yeast by expression microarray analysis. More than 75% of Rph1-regulated genes showed increased expression in the rph1-deletion mutant, suggesting that Rph1 is mainly a transcriptional repressor. The binding motif 5′-CCCCTWA-3′, which resembles the stress response element, is overrepresented in the promoters of Rph1-repressed genes. A significant proportion of Rph1-regulated genes respond to DNA damage and environmental stress. Rph1 is a labile protein, and Rad53 negatively modulates Rph1 protein level. We find that the JmjN domain is important in maintaining protein stability and the repressive effect of Rph1. Rph1 is directly associated with the promoter region of targeted genes and dissociated from chromatin before transcriptional derepression on DNA damage and oxidative stress. Of interest, the master stress-activated regulator Msn2 also regulates a subset of Rph1-repressed genes under oxidative stress. Our findings confirm the regulatory role of Rph1 as a transcriptional repressor and reveal that Rph1 might be a regulatory node connecting different signaling pathways responding to environmental stresses.

Epigenetic silencing mediates mitochondria stress-induced longevity

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play complex roles in aging, having both damaging effects and signaling functions. Transiently elevating mitochondrial stress, including mitochondrial ROS (mtROS), elicits beneficial responses that extend lifespan. However, these adaptive, longevity-signaling pathways remain poorly understood. We show here that Tel1p and Rad53p, homologs of the mammalian DNA damage response kinases ATM and Chk2, mediate a hormetic mtROS longevity signal that extends yeast chronological lifespan. This pathway senses mtROS in a manner distinct from the nuclear DNA damage response and ultimately imparts longevity by inactivating the histone demethylase Rph1p specifically at subtelomeric heterochromatin, enhancing binding of the silencing protein Sir3p, and repressing subtelomeric transcription. These results demonstrate the existence of conserved mitochondria-to-nucleus stress-signaling pathways that regulate aging through epigenetic modulation of nuclear gene expression.

Connexin 26 is down-regulated by KDM5B in the progression of bladder cancer

Connexin 26 (Cx26) expression is down-regulated and KDM5B (H3K4 demethylase) is up-regulated in the progression of bladder cancer, suggesting that Cx26 expression may be down-regulated by KDM5B in bladder cancer. To test the hypothesis, the HT1376 and T24 human bladder carcinoma cells were transfected with the plasmids pcDNA3.1-KDM5B, and caused the down-regulation of Cx26 expression. In contrast, the HT1376 and T24 cells transfected with the plasmids pTZU6+1-shRNA-KDM5B1 and pTZU6+1-shRNA-KDM5B2 caused the up-regulation of Cx26 expression. Immunohistochemistry and Spearman’s rank correlation analysis showed that the immunohistochemical expression of KDM5B and Cx26 was inversely related in bladder carcinoma tissues but no relationship in benign tissues. Taken together, these results indicate that KDM5B represses Cx26 expression in the bladder cancer development. Thus, a negative value to Cx26 immunohistochemical expression and a positive value to KDM5B immunohistochemical expression could be an ancillary diagnosis of primary bladder malignancy.

Molecular pathways: environmental estrogens activate nongenomic signaling to developmentally reprogram the epigenome

Exposure to environmental xenoestrogens is a major health concern because of the ability of these compounds to perturb estrogen receptor (ER) signaling and act as endocrine disrupting compounds (EDC). Inappropriate exposure to EDCs during development, even at low doses, can predispose individuals to an increased lifetime risk of disease, including cancer. Recent data indicate that perinatal exposure to EDCs increases cancer risk by (re)programming the epigenome via alterations in DNA and histone methylation. We and others have begun to dissect the mechanisms by which xenoestrogens disrupt the epigenetic machinery to reprogram the epigenome and induce developmental reprogramming. Our studies revealed that xenoestrogens induce nongenomic ER signaling to activate PI3K/AKT, resulting in AKT phosphorylation and inactivation of the histone methyltransferase EZH2, thus providing a direct link to disruption of the epigenome. Other epigenetic "readers, writers, and erasers" may also be targeted by nongenomic signaling, suggesting this is a central mechanism by which xenoestrogens and other EDCs disrupt the epigenome to induce developmental reprogramming. Elucidating mechanisms of developmental reprogramming of the epigenome is important for understanding how environmental exposures increase cancer risk, and provides a rationale for developing epigenetic interventions that can reverse the effects of environmental exposures to reduce cancer risk.

HP1a targets the Drosophila KDM4A demethylase to a subset of heterochromatic genes to regulate H3K36me3 levels

The KDM4 subfamily of JmjC domain-containing demethylases mediates demethylation of histone H3K36me3/me2 and H3K9me3/me2. Several studies have shown that human and yeast KDM4 proteins bind to specific gene promoters and regulate gene expression. However, the genome-wide distribution of KDM4 proteins and the mechanism of genomic-targeting remain elusive. We have previously identified Drosophila KDM4A (dKDM4A) as a histone H3K36me3 demethylase that directly interacts with HP1a. Here, we performed H3K36me3 ChIP-chip analysis in wild type and dkdm4a mutant embryos to identify genes regulated by dKDM4A demethylase activity in vivo. A subset of heterochromatic genes that show increased H3K36me3 levels in dkdm4a mutant embryos overlap with HP1a target genes. More importantly, binding to HP1a is required for dKDM4A-mediated H3K36me3 demethylation at a subset of heterochromatic genes. Collectively, these results show that HP1a functions to target the H3K36 demethylase dKDM4A to heterochromatic genes in Drosophila.

Cbk1 kinase and Bck2 control MAP kinase activation and inactivation during heat shock

Cbk1 kinase was previously implicated in regulating polarized morphogenesis, gene expression, and cell integrity. This study reveals that Cbk1 regulates heat shock signaling and stress adaptation by modulating Mpk1 activity and MAPK phosphatase localization. A model for Cbk1 and its putative substrate for these functions is presented.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cbk1 kinase is a LATS/NDR tumor suppressor orthologue and component of the Regulation of Ace2 and Morphogenesis signaling network. Cbk1 was previously implicated in regulating polarized morphogenesis, gene expression, and cell integrity. Here we establish that Cbk1 is critical for heat shock and cell wall stress signaling via Bck2, a protein associated with the Pkc1-Mpk1 cell integrity pathway. We demonstrate that cbk1 and bck2 loss-of-function mutations prevent Mpk1 kinase activation and Mpk1-dependent gene expression but do not disrupt Mpk1 Thr-190/Tyr-192 phosphorylation. Bck2 overexpression partially restores Mpk1-dependent Rlm1 transcription factor activity in cbk1 mutants, suggesting that Bck2 functions downstream of Cbk1. We demonstrate that Bck2 precisely colocalizes with the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphatase Sdp1. During heat shock, Bck2 and Sdp1 transiently redistribute from nuclei and the cytosol to mitochondria and other cytoplasmic puncta before returning to their pre-stressed localization patterns. Significantly, Cbk1 inhibition delays the return of Bck2 and Sdp1 to their pre-stressed localization patterns and delays Mpk1 Thr-190/Tyr-192 dephosphorylation upon heat shock adaptation. We conclude that Cbk1 and Bck2 are required for Mpk1 activation during heat shock and cell wall stress and for Mpk1 dephosphorylation during heat shock adaptation. These data provide the first evidence that Cbk1 kinase regulates MAPK-dependent stress signaling and provide mechanistic insight into Sdp1 phosphatase regulation.

Genetic variation and DNA replication timing, or why is there late replicating DNA?

Mutation rates vary significantly within the genome and across species. Recent studies revealed a long suspected replication-timing effect on mutation rate, but the mechanisms that regulate the increase in mutation rate as the genome is replicated remain unclear. Evidence is emerging, however, that DNA repair systems, in general, are less efficient in late replicating heterochromatic regions compared to early replicating euchromatic regions of the genome. At the same time, mutation rates in both vertebrates and invertebrates have been shown to vary with generation time (GT). GT is correlated with genome size, which suggests a possible nucleotypic effect on species-specific mutation rates. These and other observations all converge on a role for DNA replication checkpoints in modulating generation times and mutation rates during the DNA synthetic phase (S phase) of the cell cycle. The following will examine the potential role of the intra-S checkpoint in regulating cell cycle times (GT) and mutation rates in eukaryotes. This article was published online on August 5, 2011. An error was subsequently identified. This notice is included in the online and print versions to indicate that both have been corrected October 4, 2011.