The autoregulator Aca2 mediates anti-CRISPR repression

Anti-CRISPR proteins in Gluconobacter oxydans inactivate FnCas12a by acetylation

Gluconobacter oxydans is an important chassis cell for one-step production of vitamin C. Previous studies reported that CRISPR/Cas12a is naturally inactivated in G. oxydans, but the specific mechanism remains unclear. Here, we identified anti-CRISPR proteins AcrVA6, AcrVA7 and AcrVA8 in G. oxydans. They functioned as acetyltransferases to inactivate FnCas12a by respectively acetylating Lys671, Lys589 and Lys823 of FnCas12a. Lys671 and Lys823 were related residues that recognise the protospacer-adjacent motif, modification of AcrVA6 and AcrVA8 untangled the interaction between FnCas12a and dsDNA, while Lys589 played an important role in binding to the crRNA-target DNA heteroduplex, AcrVA7 prevented the formation of FnCas12a-crRNA binary complexes. In addition, histone deacetylase HDAC11 was found to prevent modification of FnCas12a by AcrVA6. Quantum mechanical calculations showed that ser37 of AcrVA6, as an intermediate between acetyl group and receptor protein, achieves acetylation through ping-pong transfer mechanism. Finally, the acetyltransferase AcrVA6 and the deacetylase HDAC11 served as photoswitches by writing and erasing acetyl groups, respectively, to achieve continuous on-off of FnCas12a. Our study reveals different mechanisms by which acetyltransferase inactivates Cas12a and successfully applies reversible acetylation to the regulation of gene editing tools, providing new insights into the function and application of acetylation.

Repurposing an Endogenous CRISPR-Cas System to Generate and Study Subtle Mutations in Bacteriophages

While bacteriophage applications benefit from effective phage engineering, selecting the desired genotype after subtle modifications remains challenging. Here, we describe a two-phase endogenous CRISPR-Cas-based phage engineering approach that enables selection of small defined edits in Pectobacterium carotovorum phage ZF40. We designed plasmids containing sequences homologous to ZF40 and a mini-CRISPR array. The plasmids allowed genome editing through homologous recombination and counter-selection against non-recombinant phage genomes using an endogenous type I-E CRISPR-Cas system. With this technique, we first deleted target genes and subsequently restored loci with modifications. This two-phase approach circumvented major challenges in subtle phage modifications, including inadequate sequence distinction for CRISPR-Cas counter-selection and the requirement of a protospacer-adjacent motif, limiting sequences that can be modified. Distinct 20-bp barcodes were incorporated through engineering as differential target sites for programmed CRISPR-Cas activity, which allowed quantification of phage variants in mixed populations. This method aids studies and applications that require mixtures of similar phages.

The double play of a phage HTH regulator

Bacteriophages use anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins to inhibit CRISPR-Cas systems. The expression of Acr is regulated by anti-CRISPR-associated (Aca) proteins, which are helix-turn-helix (HTH) repressors that bind DNA. Recently, Birkholz et al. discovered that an Aca can also repress Acr expression by binding RNA, revealing a new function for HTH repressors.

Current Updates of CRISPR/Cas System and Anti-CRISPR Proteins: Innovative Applications to Improve the Genome Editing Strategies

The Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated sequence (CRISPR/Cas) system is a cutting-edge genome-editing tool employed to explore the functions of normal and disease-related genes. The CRISPR/Cas system has a remarkable diversity in the composition and architecture of genomic loci and Cas protein sequences. Owing to its excellent efficiency and specificity, this system adds an outstanding dimension to biomedical research on genetic manipulation of eukaryotic cells. However, safe, efficient, and specific delivery of this system to target cells and tissues and their off-target effects are considered critical bottlenecks for the therapeutic applications. Recently discovered anti-CRISPR proteins (Acr) play a significant role in limiting the effects of this system. Acrs are relatively small proteins that are highly specific to CRISPR variants and exhibit remarkable structural diversity. The in silico approaches, crystallography, and cryo-electron microscopy play significant roles in elucidating the mechanisms of action of Acrs. Acrs block the CRISPR/Cas system mainly by employing four mechanisms: CRISPR/Cas complex assembly interruption, target-binding interference, target cleavage prevention, and degradation of cyclic oligonucleotide signaling molecules. Engineered CRISPR/Cas systems are frequently used in gene therapy, diagnostics, and functional genomics. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying Acr action may help in the safe and effective use of CRISPR/Cas tools for genetic modification, particularly in the context of medicine. Thus, attempts to regulate prokaryotic CRISPR/Cas surveillance complexes will advance the development of antimicrobial drugs and treatment of human diseases. In this review, recent updates on CRISPR/Cas systems, especially CRISPR/Cas9 and Acrs, and their novel mechanistic insights are elaborated. In addition, the role of Acrs in the novel applications of CRISPP/Cas biotechnology for precise genome editing and other applications is discussed.

Anti-CRISPRs deconstruct bacterial defense

Deploying anti-CRISPR proteins is a potent strategy used by phages to inhibit bacterial CRISPR-Cas defense. In a new Nature paper, Trost et al.1 discover and characterize an exciting anti-CRISPR mechanism with possible implications beyond this microscopic arms race.

A new anti-CRISPR gene promotes the spread of drug-resistance plasmids in Klebsiella pneumoniae

The Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae, Kp) populations carrying both resistance-encoding and virulence-encoding mobile genetic elements (MGEs) significantly threaten global health. In this study, we identified a new anti-CRISPR gene (acrIE10) on a conjugative plasmid with self-target sequence in K. pneumoniae with type I-E* CRISPR-Cas system. AcrIE10 interacts with the Cas7* subunit of K. pneumoniae I-E* CRISPR-Cas system. The crystal structure of the AcrIE10-KpCas7* complex suggests that AcrIE10 suppresses the I-E* CRISPR-Cas by binding directly to Cas7 to prevent its hexamerization, thereby preventing the surveillance complex assembly and crRNA loading. Bioinformatic and functional analyses revealed that AcrIE10 is functionally widespread across diverse species. Our study reports a novel anti-CRISPR and highlights its potential role in spreading resistance and virulence among pathogens.

Phage anti-CRISPR control by an RNA- and DNA-binding helix-turn-helix protein

In all organisms, regulation of gene expression must be adjusted to meet cellular requirements and frequently involves helix-turn-helix (HTH) domain proteins1. For instance, in the arms race between bacteria and bacteriophages, rapid expression of phage anti-CRISPR (acr) genes upon infection enables evasion from CRISPR-Cas defence; transcription is then repressed by an HTH-domain-containing anti-CRISPR-associated (Aca) protein, probably to reduce fitness costs from excessive expression2-5. However, how a single HTH regulator adjusts anti-CRISPR production to cope with increasing phage genome copies and accumulating acr mRNA is unknown. Here we show that the HTH domain of the regulator Aca2, in addition to repressing Acr synthesis transcriptionally through DNA binding, inhibits translation of mRNAs by binding conserved RNA stem-loops and blocking ribosome access. The cryo-electron microscopy structure of the approximately 40 kDa Aca2-RNA complex demonstrates how the versatile HTH domain specifically discriminates RNA from DNA binding sites. These combined regulatory modes are widespread in the Aca2 family and facilitate CRISPR-Cas inhibition in the face of rapid phage DNA replication without toxic acr overexpression. Given the ubiquity of HTH-domain-containing proteins, it is anticipated that many more of them elicit regulatory control by dual DNA and RNA binding.

Regulatory sequence-based discovery of anti-defense genes in archaeal viruses

In silico identification of viral anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) has relied largely on the guilt-by-association method using known Acrs or anti-CRISPR associated proteins (Acas) as the bait. However, the low number and limited spread of the characterized archaeal Acrs and Aca hinders our ability to identify Acrs using guilt-by-association. Here, based on the observation that the few characterized archaeal Acrs and Aca are transcribed immediately post viral infection, we hypothesize that these genes, and many other unidentified anti-defense genes (ADG), are under the control of conserved regulatory sequences including a strong promoter, which can be used to predict anti-defense genes in archaeal viruses. Using this consensus sequence based method, we identify 354 potential ADGs in 57 archaeal viruses and 6 metagenome-assembled genomes. Experimental validation identified a CRISPR subtype I-A inhibitor and the first virally encoded inhibitor of an archaeal toxin-antitoxin based immune system. We also identify regulatory proteins potentially akin to Acas that can facilitate further identification of ADGs combined with the guilt-by-association approach. These results demonstrate the potential of regulatory sequence analysis for extensive identification of ADGs in viruses of archaea and bacteria.

Inhibitors of bacterial immune systems: discovery, mechanisms and applications

To contend with the diversity and ubiquity of bacteriophages and other mobile genetic elements, bacteria have developed an arsenal of immune defence mechanisms. Bacterial defences include CRISPR-Cas, restriction-modification and a growing list of mechanistically diverse systems, which constitute the bacterial 'immune system'. As a response, bacteriophages and mobile genetic elements have evolved direct and indirect mechanisms to circumvent or block bacterial defence pathways and ensure successful infection. Recent advances in methodological and computational approaches, as well as the increasing availability of genome sequences, have boosted the discovery of direct inhibitors of bacterial defence systems. In this Review, we discuss methods for the discovery of direct inhibitors, their diverse mechanisms of action and perspectives on their emerging applications in biotechnology and beyond.

Dairy phages escape CRISPR defence of Streptococcus thermophilus via the anti-CRISPR AcrIIA3

Bacterial community collapse due to phage infection is a major risk in cheese making processes. As virulent phages are ubiquitous and diverse in milk fermentation factories, the use of phage-resistant lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is essential to obtain high-quality fermented dairy products. The LAB species Streptococcus thermophilus contains two type II-A CRISPR-Cas systems (CRISPR1 and CRISPR3) that can effectively protect against phage infection. However, virulent streptococcal phages carrying anti-CRISPR proteins (ACR) that block the activity of CRISPR-Cas systems have emerged in yogurt and cheese environments. For example, phages carrying AcrIIA5 can impede both CRISPR1 and CRISPR3 systems, while AcrIIA6 stops only CRISPR1. Here, we explore the activity and diversity of a third streptococcal phage anti-CRISPR protein, namely AcrIIA3. We were able to demonstrate that AcrIIA3 is efficiently active against the CRISPR3-Cas system of S. thermophilus. We used AlphaFold2 to infer the structure of AcrIIA3 and we predicted that this new family of functional ACR in virulent streptococcal phages has a new α-helical fold, with no previously identified structural homologs. Because ACR proteins are being explored as modulators in genome editing applications, we also tested AcrIIA3 against SpCas9. We found that AcrIIA3 could block SpCas9 in bacteria but not in human cells. Understanding the diversity and functioning of anti-defence mechanisms will be of importance in the design of long-term stable starter cultures.

The structure of AcrIC9 revealing the putative inhibitory mechanism of AcrIC9 against the type IC CRISPR-Cas system

CRISPR-Cas systems are known to be part of the bacterial adaptive immune system that provides resistance against intruders such as viruses, phages and other mobile genetic elements. To combat this bacterial defense mechanism, phages encode inhibitors called Acrs (anti-CRISPR proteins) that can suppress them. AcrIC9 is the most recently identified member of the AcrIC family that inhibits the type IC CRISPR-Cas system. Here, the crystal structure of AcrIC9 from Rhodobacter capsulatus is reported, which comprises a novel fold made of three central antiparallel β-strands surrounded by three α-helixes, a structure that has not been detected before. It is also shown that AcrIC9 can form a dimer via disulfide bonds generated by the Cys69 residue. Finally, it is revealed that AcrIC9 directly binds to the type IC cascade. Analysis and comparison of its structure with structural homologs indicate that AcrIC9 belongs to DNA-mimic Acrs that directly bind to the cascade complex and hinder the target DNA from binding to the cascade.

Applications of Anti-CRISPR Proteins in Genome Editing and Biotechnology

In the ten years since the discovery of the first anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins, the number of validated Acrs has expanded rapidly, as has our understanding of the diverse mechanisms they employ to suppress natural CRISPR-Cas immunity. Many, though not all, function via direct, specific interaction with Cas protein effectors. The abilities of Acr proteins to modulate the activities and properties of CRISPR-Cas effectors have been exploited for an ever-increasing spectrum of biotechnological uses, most of which involve the establishment of control over genome editing systems. This control can be used to minimize off-target editing, restrict editing based on spatial, temporal, or conditional cues, limit the spread of gene drive systems, and select for genome-edited bacteriophages. Anti-CRISPRs have also been developed to overcome bacterial immunity, facilitate viral vector production, control synthetic gene circuits, and other purposes. The impressive and ever-growing diversity of Acr inhibitory mechanisms will continue to allow the tailored applications of Acrs.

Anti-CRISPR Discovery: Using Magnets to Find Needles in Haystacks

CRISPR-Cas immune systems in bacteria and archaea protect against viral infection, which has spurred viruses to develop dedicated inhibitors of these systems called anti-CRISPRs (Acrs). Like most host-virus arms races, many diverse examples of these immune and counter-immune proteins are encoded by the genomes of bacteria, archaea, and their viruses. For the case of Acrs, it is almost certain that just a small minority of nature's true diversity has been described. In this review, I discuss the various approaches used to identify these Acrs and speculate on the future for Acr discovery. Because Acrs can determine infection outcomes in nature and regulate CRISPR-Cas activities in applied settings, they have a dual importance to both host-virus conflicts and emerging biotechnologies. Thus, revealing the largely hidden world of Acrs should provide important lessons in microbiology that have the potential to ripple far beyond the field.

Unveil the Secret of the Bacteria and Phage Arms Race

Bacteria have developed different mechanisms to defend against phages, such as preventing phages from being adsorbed on the surface of host bacteria; through the superinfection exclusion (Sie) block of phage's nucleic acid injection; by restricting modification (R-M) systems, CRISPR-Cas, aborting infection (Abi) and other defense systems to interfere with the replication of phage genes in the host; through the quorum sensing (QS) enhancement of phage's resistant effect. At the same time, phages have also evolved a variety of counter-defense strategies, such as degrading extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) that mask receptors or recognize new receptors, thereby regaining the ability to adsorb host cells; modifying its own genes to prevent the R-M systems from recognizing phage genes or evolving proteins that can inhibit the R-M complex; through the gene mutation itself, building nucleus-like compartments or evolving anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins to resist CRISPR-Cas systems; and by producing antirepressors or blocking the combination of autoinducers (AIs) and its receptors to suppress the QS. The arms race between bacteria and phages is conducive to the coevolution between bacteria and phages. This review details bacterial anti-phage strategies and anti-defense strategies of phages and will provide basic theoretical support for phage therapy while deeply understanding the interaction mechanism between bacteria and phages.

Antibiotics that affect translation can antagonize phage infectivity by interfering with the deployment of counter-defenses

It is becoming increasingly clear that antibiotics can both positively and negatively impact the infectivity of bacteriophages (phage), but the underlying mechanisms often remain unclear. Here we demonstrate that antibiotics that target the protein translation machinery can fundamentally alter the outcome of bacteria-phage interactions by interfering with the production of phage-encoded counter-defense proteins. Specifically, using Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 and phage DMS3vir as a model, we show that bacteria with Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat, CRISPR associated (CRISPR-Cas) immune systems have elevated levels of immunity against phage that encode anti-CRISPR (acr) genes when translation inhibitors are present in the environment. CRISPR-Cas are highly prevalent defense systems that enable bacteria to detect and destroy phage genomes in a sequence-specific manner. In response, many phages encode acr genes that are expressed immediately following the infection to inhibit key steps of the CRISPR-Cas immune response. Our data show that while phage-carrying acr genes can amplify efficiently on bacteria with CRISPR-Cas immune systems in the absence of antibiotics, the presence of antibiotics that act on protein translation prevents phage amplification, while protecting bacteria from lysis.

Ecology and evolution of phages encoding anti-CRISPR proteins

CRISPR-Cas are prokaryotic defence systems that provide protection against invasion by mobile genetic elements (MGE), including bacteriophages. MGE can overcome CRISPR-Cas defences by encoding anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins. These proteins are produced in the early stages of the infection and inhibit the CRISPR-Cas machinery to allow phage replication. While research on Acr has mainly focused on their discovery, structure and mode of action, and their applications in biotechnology, the impact of Acr on the ecology of MGE as well as on the coevolution with their bacterial hosts only begins to be unravelled. In this review, we summarise our current understanding on the distribution of anti-CRISPR genes in MGE, the ecology of phages encoding Acr, and their coevolution with bacterial defence mechanisms. We highlight the need to use more diverse and complex experimental models to better understand the impact of anti-CRISPR in MGE-host interactions.

AcaFinder: Genome Mining for Anti-CRISPR-Associated Genes

Anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins are encoded by (pro)viruses to inhibit their host's CRISPR-Cas systems. Genes encoding Acr and Aca (Acr associated) proteins often colocalize to form acr-aca operons. Here, we present AcaFinder as the first Aca genome mining tool. AcaFinder can (i) predict Acas and their associated acr-aca operons using guilt-by-association (GBA); (ii) identify homologs of known Acas using an HMM (Hidden Markov model) database; (iii) take input genomes for potential prophages, CRISPR-Cas systems, and self-targeting spacers (STSs); and (iv) provide a standalone program (https://github.com/boweny920/AcaFinder) and a web server (http://aca.unl.edu/Aca). AcaFinder was applied to mining over 16,000 prokaryotic and 142,000 gut phage genomes. After a multistep filtering, 36 high-confident new Aca families were identified, which is three times that of the 12 known Aca families. Seven new Aca families were from major human gut bacteria (Bacteroidota, Actinobacteria, and Fusobacteria) and their phages, while most known Aca families were from Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. A complex association network between Acrs and Acas was revealed by analyzing their operonic colocalizations. It appears very common in evolution that the same aca genes can recombine with different acr genes and vice versa to form diverse acr-aca operon combinations. IMPORTANCE At least four bioinformatics programs have been published for genome mining of Acrs since 2020. In contrast, no bioinformatics tools are available for automated Aca discovery. As the self-transcriptional repressor of acr-aca operons, Aca can be viewed as anti-anti-CRISPRs, with great potential in the improvement of CRISPR-Cas technology. Although all the 12 known Aca proteins contain a conserved helix-turn-helix (HTH) domain, not all HTH-containing proteins are Acas. However, HTH-containing proteins with adjacent Acr homologs encoded in the same genetic operon are likely Aca proteins. AcaFinder implements this guilt-by-association idea and the idea of using HMMs of known Acas for homologs into one software package. Applying AcaFinder in screening prokaryotic and gut phage genomes reveals a complex acr-aca operonic colocalization network between different families of Acrs and Acas.

Molecular basis of dual anti-CRISPR and auto-regulatory functions of AcrIF24

CRISPR-Cas systems are adaptive immune systems in bacteria and archaea that provide resistance against phages and other mobile genetic elements. To fight against CRISPR-Cas systems, phages and archaeal viruses encode anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins that inhibit CRISPR-Cas systems. The expression of acr genes is controlled by anti-CRISPR-associated (Aca) proteins encoded within acr-aca operons. AcrIF24 is a recently identified Acr that inhibits the type I-F CRISPR-Cas system. Interestingly, AcrIF24 was predicted to be a dual-function Acr and Aca. Here, we elucidated the crystal structure of AcrIF24 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and identified its operator sequence within the regulated acr-aca operon promoter. The structure of AcrIF24 has a novel domain composition, with wing, head and body domains. The body domain is responsible for recognition of promoter DNA for Aca regulatory activity. We also revealed that AcrIF24 directly bound to type I-F Cascade, specifically to Cas7 via its head domain as part of its Acr mechanism. Our results provide new molecular insights into the mechanism of a dual functional Acr-Aca protein.

Structural basis of AcrIF24 as an anti-CRISPR protein and transcriptional suppressor

Anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins are encoded by phages to inactivate CRISPR-Cas systems of bacteria and archaea and are used to enhance the CRISPR toolbox for genome editing. Here we report the structure and mechanism of AcrIF24, an Acr protein that inhibits the type I-F CRISPR-Cas system from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. AcrIF24 is a homodimer that associates with two copies of the surveillance complex (Csy) and prevents the hybridization between CRISPR RNA and target DNA. Furthermore, AcrIF24 functions as an anti-CRISPR-associated (Aca) protein to repress the transcription of the acrIF23-acrIF24 operon. Alone or in complex with Csy, AcrIF24 is capable of binding to the acrIF23-acrIF24 promoter DNA with nanomolar affinity. The structure of a Csy-AcrIF24-promoter DNA complex at 2.7 Å reveals the mechanism for transcriptional suppression. Our results reveal that AcrIF24 functions as an Acr-Aca fusion protein, and they extend understanding of the diverse mechanisms used by Acr proteins.

Widespread repression of anti-CRISPR production by anti-CRISPR-associated proteins

Many bacteria use CRISPR-Cas systems to defend against invasive mobile genetic elements (MGEs). In response, MGEs have developed strategies to resist CRISPR-Cas, including the use of anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins. Known acr genes may be followed in an operon by a putative regulatory Acr-associated gene (aca), suggesting the importance of regulation. Although ten families of helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif containing Aca proteins have been identified (Aca1-10), only three have been tested and shown to be transcriptional repressors of acr-aca expression. The AcrIIA1 protein (a Cas9 inhibitor) also contains a functionally similar HTH containing repressor domain. Here, we identified and analysed Aca and AcrIIA1 homologs across all bacterial genomes. Using HMM models we found aca-like genes are widely distributed in bacteria, both with and without known acr genes. The putative promoter regions of acr-aca operons were analysed and members of each family of bacterial Aca tested for regulatory function. For each Aca family, we predicted a conserved inverted repeat binding site within a core promoter. Promoters containing these sites directed reporter expression in E. coli and were repressed by the cognate Aca protein. These data demonstrate that acr repression by Aca proteins is widely conserved in nature.

Molecular basis of anti-CRISPR operon repression by Aca10

CRISPR-Cas systems are bacterial defense systems for fighting against invaders such as bacteriophages and mobile genetic elements. To escape destruction by these bacterial immune systems, phages have co-evolved multiple anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins, which inhibit CRISPR-Cas function. Many acr genes form an operon with genes encoding transcriptional regulators, called anti-CRISPR-associated (Aca) proteins. Aca10 is the most recently discovered Aca family that is encoded within an operon containing acrIC7 and acrIC6 in Pseudomonas citronellolis. Here, we report the high-resolution crystal structure of an Aca10 protein to unveil the molecular basis of transcriptional repressor role of Aca10 in the acrIC7-acrIC6-aca10 operon. We identified that Aca10 forms a dimer in solution, which is critical for binding specific DNA. We also showed that Aca10 directly recognizes a 21 bp palindromic sequence in the promoter of the acr operon. Finally, we revealed that R44 of Aca10 is a critical residue involved in the DNA binding, which likely results in a high degree of DNA bending.

Lack of Cas13a inhibition by anti-CRISPR proteins from Leptotrichia prophages

CRISPR systems are prokaryotic adaptive immune systems that use RNA-guided Cas nucleases to recognize and destroy foreign genetic elements. To overcome CRISPR immunity, bacteriophages have evolved diverse families of anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs). Recently, Lin et al. (2020) described the discovery and characterization of 7 Acr families (AcrVIA1-7) that inhibit type VI-A CRISPR systems. We detail several inconsistencies that question the results reported in the Lin et al. (2020) study. These include inaccurate bioinformatics analyses and bacterial strains that are impossible to construct. Published strains were provided by the authors, but MS2 bacteriophage plaque assays did not support the published results. We also independently tested the Acr sequences described in the original report, in E. coli and mammalian cells, but did not observe anti-Cas13a activity. Taken together, our data and analyses prompt us to question the claim that AcrVIA1-7 reported in Lin et al. are type VI anti-CRISPR proteins.

Anti-CRISPR prediction using deep learning reveals an inhibitor of Cas13b nucleases

As part of the ongoing bacterial-phage arms race, CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria clear invading phages whereas anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) in phages inhibit CRISPR defenses. Known Acrs have proven extremely diverse, complicating their identification. Here, we report a deep learning algorithm for Acr identification that revealed an Acr against type VI-B CRISPR-Cas systems. The algorithm predicted numerous putative Acrs spanning almost all CRISPR-Cas types and subtypes, including over 7,000 putative type IV and VI Acrs not predicted by other algorithms. By performing a cell-free screen for Acr hits against type VI-B systems, we identified a potent inhibitor of Cas13b nucleases we named AcrVIB1. AcrVIB1 blocks Cas13b-mediated defense against a targeted plasmid and lytic phage, and its inhibitory function principally occurs upstream of ribonucleoprotein complex formation. Overall, our work helps expand the known Acr universe, aiding our understanding of the bacteria-phage arms race and the use of Acrs to control CRISPR technologies.

Insights into the inhibition of type I-F CRISPR-Cas system by a multifunctional anti-CRISPR protein AcrIF24

CRISPR-Cas systems are prokaryotic adaptive immune systems and phages use anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) to counteract these systems. Here, we report the structures of AcrIF24 and its complex with the crRNA-guided surveillance (Csy) complex. The HTH motif of AcrIF24 can bind the Acr promoter region and repress its transcription, suggesting its role as an Aca gene in self-regulation. AcrIF24 forms a homodimer and further induces dimerization of the Csy complex. Apart from blocking the hybridization of target DNA to the crRNA, AcrIF24 also induces the binding of non-sequence-specific dsDNA to the Csy complex, similar to AcrIF9, although this binding seems to play a minor role in AcrIF24 inhibitory capacity. Further structural and biochemical studies of the Csy-AcrIF24-dsDNA complexes and of AcrIF24 mutants reveal that the HTH motif of AcrIF24 and the PAM recognition loop of the Csy complex are structural elements essential for this non-specific dsDNA binding. Moreover, AcrIF24 and AcrIF9 display distinct characteristics in inducing non-specific DNA binding. Together, our findings highlight a multifunctional Acr and suggest potential wide distribution of Acr-induced non-specific DNA binding.

Phages use anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) to counteract the bacterial CRISPR-Cas systems. Here, the authors characterize AcrIF24, which functions as an Aca (Acr-associated) to repress and regulate its own transcription, dimerizes the Csy complex, blocks the hybridization of target DNA, and tethers non-sequence-specific DNA to the Csy complex.

Discovery of potent and versatile CRISPR–Cas9 inhibitors engineered for chemically controllable genome editing

Anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins are encoded by many mobile genetic elements (MGEs) such as phages and plasmids to combat CRISPR–Cas adaptive immune systems employed by prokaryotes, which provide powerful tools for CRISPR–Cas-based applications. Here, we discovered nine distinct type II-A anti-CRISPR (AcrIIA24–32) families from Streptococcus MGEs and found that most Acrs can potently inhibit type II-A Cas9 orthologs from Streptococcus (SpyCas9, St1Cas9 or St3Cas9) in bacterial and human cells. Among these Acrs, AcrIIA26, AcrIIA27, AcrIIA30 and AcrIIA31 are able to block Cas9 binding to DNA, while AcrIIA24 abrogates DNA cleavage by Cas9. Notably, AcrIIA25.1 and AcrIIA32.1 can inhibit both DNA binding and DNA cleavage activities of SpyCas9, exhibiting unique anti-CRISPR characteristics. Importantly, we developed several chemically inducible anti-CRISPR variants based on AcrIIA25.1 and AcrIIA32.1 by comprising hybrids of Acr protein and the 4-hydroxytamoxifen-responsive intein, which enabled post-translational control of CRISPR–Cas9-mediated genome editing in human cells. Taken together, our work expands the diversity of type II-A anti-CRISPR families and the toolbox of Acr proteins for the chemically inducible control of Cas9-based applications.

Molecular basis of transcriptional repression of anti-CRISPR by anti-CRISPR-associated 2

CRISPR-Cas systems are well known host defense mechanisms that are conserved in bacteria and archaea. To counteract CRISPR-Cas systems, phages and viruses have evolved to possess multiple anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins that can inhibit the host CRISPR-Cas system via different strategies. The expression of acr genes is controlled by anti-CRISPR-associated (Aca) proteins that bind to an upstream promoter and regulate the expression of acr genes during transcription. Although the role of Aca as a transcriptional repressor has been demonstrated, the mechanism of action of Aca has not been determined. Here, the molecular mechanism underlying the Aca2-mediated transcriptional control of acr genes was elucidated by determining the crystal structure of Aca2 from Oceanimonas smirnovii at a high resolution of 1.92 Å. Aca2 forms a dimer in solution, and dimerization of Aca2 is critical for specific promoter binding. The promoter-binding strategy of dimeric Aca2 was also revealed by performing mutagenesis studies. The atomic structure of the Aca family shown in this study provides insights into the fine regulation of host defense and immune-escape mechanisms and also demonstrates the conserved working mechanism of the Aca family.

OUP accepted manuscript

Epigenetic DNA methylation plays an important role in bacteria by influencing gene expression and allowing discrimination between self-DNA and intruders such as phages and plasmids. Restriction–modification (RM) systems use a methyltransferase (MTase) to modify a specific sequence motif, thus protecting host DNA from cleavage by a cognate restriction endonuclease (REase) while leaving invading DNA vulnerable. Other REases occur solitarily and cleave methylated DNA. REases and RM systems are frequently mobile, influencing horizontal gene transfer by altering the compatibility of the host for foreign DNA uptake. However, whether mobile defence systems affect pre-existing host defences remains obscure. Here, we reveal an epigenetic conflict between an RM system (PcaRCI) and a methylation-dependent REase (PcaRCII) in the plant pathogen Pectobacterium carotovorum RC5297. The PcaRCI RM system provides potent protection against unmethylated plasmids and phages, but its methylation motif is targeted by the methylation-dependent PcaRCII. This potentially lethal co-existence is enabled through epigenetic silencing of the PcaRCII-encoding gene via promoter methylation by the PcaRCI MTase. Comparative genome analyses suggest that the PcaRCII-encoding gene was already present and was silenced upon establishment of the PcaRCI system. These findings provide a striking example for selfishness of RM systems and intracellular competition between different defences.

Structural basis for anti-CRISPR repression mediated by bacterial operon proteins Aca1 and Aca2

It has been shown that phages have evolved anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins to inhibit host CRISPR-Cas systems. Most acr genes are located upstream of anti-CRISPR-associated (aca) genes, which is instrumental for identifying these acr genes. Thus far, eight Aca families (Aca1-Aca8) have been identified, all proteins of which share low sequence homology and bind to different target DNA sequences. Recently, Aca1 and Aca2 proteins were discovered to function as repressors by binding to acr-aca promoters, thus implying a potential anti-anti-CRISPR mechanism. However, the structural basis for the repression roles of Aca proteins is still unknown. Here, we elucidated apo-structures of Aca1 and Aca2 proteins and their complex structures with their cognate operator DNA in two model systems, the Pseudomonas phage JBD30 and the Pectobacterium carotovorum template phage ZF40. In combination with biochemical and cellular assays, our study unveils dimerization and DNA-recognition mechanisms of Aca1 and Aca2 family proteins, thus revealing the molecular basis for Aca1-and Aca2-mediated anti-CRISPR repression. Our results also shed light on understanding the repression roles of other Aca family proteins and autoregulation roles of acr-aca operons.

Prophage integration into CRISPR loci enables evasion of antiviral immunity in Streptococcus pyogenes

CRISPR loci are composed of short DNA repeats separated by sequences, known as spacers, that match the genomes of invaders such as phages and plasmids. Spacers are transcribed and processed to generate RNA guides used by CRISPR-associated nucleases to recognize and destroy the complementary nucleic acids of invaders. To counteract this defence, phages can produce small proteins that inhibit these nucleases, termed anti-CRISPRs (Acrs). Here we demonstrate that the ΦAP1.1 temperate phage utilizes an alternative approach to antagonize the type II-A CRISPR response in Streptococcus pyogenes. Immediately after infection, this phage expresses a small anti-CRISPR protein, AcrIIA23, that prevents Cas9 function, allowing ΦAP1.1 to integrate into the direct repeats of the CRISPR locus, neutralizing immunity. However, acrIIA23 is not transcribed during lysogeny and phage integration/excision cycles can result in the deletion and/or transduction of spacers, enabling a complex modulation of the type II-A CRISPR immune response. A bioinformatic search identified prophages integrated not only in the CRISPR repeats, but also the cas genes, of diverse bacterial species, suggesting that prophage disruption of the CRISPR-cas locus is a recurrent mechanism to counteract immunity.

SorTn-seq: a high-throughput functional genomics approach to discovering regulators of bacterial gene expression

We recently developed a high-throughput functional genomics approach, named 'SorTn-seq', to identify factors affecting expression of any gene of interest in bacteria. Our approach facilitates high-throughput screening of complex mutant pools, a task previously hindered by a lack of suitable techniques. SorTn-seq combines high-density, Tn5-like transposon mutagenesis with fluorescence-activated cell sorting of a strain harboring a promoter-fluorescent reporter fusion, to isolate mutants with altered gene expression. The transposon mutant pool is sorted into different bins on the basis of fluorescence, and mutants are deep-sequenced to identify transposon insertions. DNA is prepared for sequencing by using commercial kits augmented with custom primers, enhancing ease of use and reproducibility. Putative regulators are identified by comparing the number of insertions per genomic feature in the different sort bins, by using existing bioinformatic pipelines and software packages. SorTn-seq can be completed in 1-2 weeks and requires general microbiology skills and basic flow cytometry experience.

Structure-based functional mechanisms and biotechnology applications of anti-CRISPR proteins

CRISPR loci and Cas proteins provide adaptive immunity in prokaryotes against invading bacteriophages and plasmids. In response, bacteriophages have evolved a broad spectrum of anti-CRISPR proteins (anti-CRISPRs) to counteract and overcome this immunity pathway. Numerous anti-CRISPRs have been identified to date, which suppress single-subunit Cas effectors (in CRISPR class 2, type II, V and VI systems) and multisubunit Cascade effectors (in CRISPR class 1, type I and III systems). Crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy structural studies of anti-CRISPRs bound to effector complexes, complemented by functional experiments in vitro and in vivo, have identified four major CRISPR-Cas suppression mechanisms: inhibition of CRISPR-Cas complex assembly, blocking of target binding, prevention of target cleavage, and degradation of cyclic oligonucleotide signalling molecules. In this Review, we discuss novel mechanistic insights into anti-CRISPR function that have emerged from X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy studies, and how these structures in combination with function studies provide valuable tools for the ever-growing CRISPR-Cas biotechnology toolbox, to be used for precise and robust genome editing and other applications.

Crystal structure of the anti-CRISPR repressor Aca2

•

The crystal structure of the anti-CRISPR repressor Aca2 has been solved to 1.34 Å.

•

Aca2 contains a new dimerization domain for HTH transcriptional regulators.

•

Aca2-like regulators are found encoded in diverse biological contexts.

Bacteria use adaptive CRISPR-Cas immune mechanisms to protect from invasion by bacteriophages and other mobile genetic elements. In response, bacteriophages and mobile genetic elements have co-evolved anti-CRISPR proteins to inhibit the bacterial defense. We and others have previously shown that anti-CRISPR associated (Aca) proteins can regulate this anti-CRISPR counter-attack. Here, we report the first structure of an Aca protein, the Aca2 DNA-binding transcriptional autorepressor from Pectobacterium carotovorum bacteriophage ZF40, determined to 1.34 Å. Aca2 presents a conserved N-terminal helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain and a previously uncharacterized C-terminal dimerization domain. Dimerization positions the Aca2 recognition helices for insertion into the major grooves of target DNA, supporting its role in regulating anti-CRISPRs. Furthermore, database comparisons identified uncharacterized Aca2 structural homologs in pathogenic bacteria, suggesting that Aca2 represents the first characterized member of a more widespread family of transcriptional regulators.

Anti-CRISPRs go viral: The infection biology of CRISPR-Cas inhibitors

Bacteriophages encode diverse anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins that inhibit CRISPR-Cas immunity during infection of their bacterial hosts. Although detailed mechanisms have been characterized for multiple Acr proteins, an understanding of their role in phage infection biology is just emerging. Here, we review recent work in this area and propose a framework of "phage autonomy" to evaluate CRISPR-immune evasion strategies. During phage infection, Acr proteins are deployed by a tightly regulated "fast on-fast off" transcriptional burst, which is necessary, but insufficient, for CRISPR-Cas inactivation. Instead of a single phage shutting down CRISPR-Cas immunity, a community of acr-carrying phages cooperate to suppress bacterial immunity, displaying low phage autonomy. Enzymatic Acr proteins with novel mechanisms have been recently revealed and are predicted to enhance phage autonomy, while phage DNA protective measures offer the highest phage autonomy observed. These varied Acr mechanisms and strengths also have unexpected impacts on the bacterial populations and competing phages.

Controlling and enhancing CRISPR systems

Many bacterial and archaeal organisms use clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR associated (CRISPR-Cas) systems to defend themselves from mobile genetic elements. These CRISPR-Cas systems are classified into six types based on their composition and mechanism. CRISPR-Cas enzymes are widely used for genome editing and offer immense therapeutic opportunity to treat genetic diseases. To realize their full potential, it is important to control the timing, duration, efficiency and specificity of CRISPR-Cas enzyme activities. In this Review we discuss the mechanisms of natural CRISPR-Cas regulatory biomolecules and engineering strategies that enhance or inhibit CRISPR-Cas immunity by altering enzyme function. We also discuss the potential applications of these CRISPR regulators and highlight unanswered questions about their evolution and purpose in nature.

Discovery of multiple anti-CRISPRs highlights anti-defense gene clustering in mobile genetic elements

Many prokaryotes employ CRISPR-Cas systems to combat invading mobile genetic elements (MGEs). In response, some MGEs have developed strategies to bypass immunity, including anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins; yet the diversity, distribution and spectrum of activity of this immune evasion strategy remain largely unknown. Here, we report the discovery of new Acrs by assaying candidate genes adjacent to a conserved Acr-associated (Aca) gene, aca5, against a panel of six type I systems: I-F (Pseudomonas, Pectobacterium, and Serratia), I-E (Pseudomonas and Serratia), and I-C (Pseudomonas). We uncover 11 type I-F and/or I-E anti-CRISPR genes encoded on chromosomal and extrachromosomal MGEs within Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas, and an additional Aca (aca9). The acr genes not only associate with other acr genes, but also with genes encoding inhibitors of distinct bacterial defense systems. Thus, our findings highlight the potential exploitation of acr loci neighborhoods for the identification of previously undescribed anti-defense systems.

Conquering CRISPR: how phages overcome bacterial adaptive immunity

The rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has led to renewed interest in the use of their natural enemies, phages, for the prevention and treatment of infections. However, phage therapy requires detailed knowledge of the interactions between these entities. Bacteria defend themselves against phage predation with a large repertoire of defences. Among these, CRISPR-Cas systems stand out due to their adaptive character, mechanistic complexity and diversity, and present a significant hurdle for phage infection. Here, we provide an overview of how phages can circumvent CRISPR-Cas defence, ranging from target sequence mutations and DNA modifications to anti-CRISPR proteins and nucleus-like protective structures. An in-depth understanding of these phage evasion strategies is crucial for the successful development of phage therapy applications.

AcrIIA5 Inhibits a Broad Range of Cas9 Orthologs by Preventing DNA Target Cleavage

CRISPR-Cas9 is an adaptive immune system for prokaryotes to defend against invasive genetic elements such as phages and has been used as a powerful tool for genome editing and modulation. To overcome CRISPR immunity, phages encode anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) to inhibit Cas9, providing an efficient "off-switch" tool for Cas9-based applications. Here, we characterized AcrIIA5, which is a Cas9 inhibitor discovered in a virulent phage of Streptococcus thermophilus. We found that AcrIIA5 is a potent and broad-spectrum inhibitor of CRISPR-Cas9, which can inhibit diverse Cas9 orthologs of type II-A, type II-B, and type II-C. AcrIIA5 inhibits Cas9 by preventing DNA target cleavage, but DNA target binding of Cas9 is unaffected. Importantly, it can affect the activity of the RuvC nuclease domain of Cas9 independent of the HNH nuclease domain. Our work expands the diversity of the inhibitory mechanisms used by Acrs and provides the guidance for developing controlling tools in Cas9-based applications.

AcrFinder: genome mining anti-CRISPR operons in prokaryotes and their viruses

Anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins encoded by (pro)phages/(pro)viruses have a great potential to enable a more controllable genome editing. However, genome mining new Acr proteins is challenging due to the lack of a conserved functional domain and the low sequence similarity among experimentally characterized Acr proteins. We introduce here AcrFinder, a web server (http://bcb.unl.edu/AcrFinder) that combines three well-accepted ideas used by previous experimental studies to pre-screen genomic data for Acr candidates. These ideas include homology search, guilt-by-association (GBA), and CRISPR-Cas self-targeting spacers. Compared to existing bioinformatics tools, AcrFinder has the following unique functions: (i) it is the first online server specifically mining genomes for Acr-Aca operons; (ii) it provides a most comprehensive Acr and Aca (Acr-associated regulator) database (populated by GBA-based Acr and Aca datasets); (iii) it combines homology-based, GBA-based, and self-targeting approaches in one software package; and (iv) it provides a user-friendly web interface to take both nucleotide and protein sequence files as inputs, and output a result page with graphic representation of the genomic contexts of Acr-Aca operons. The leave-one-out cross-validation on experimentally characterized Acr-Aca operons showed that AcrFinder had a 100% recall. AcrFinder will be a valuable web resource to help experimental microbiologists discover new Anti-CRISPRs.

Harnessing the type I CRISPR-Cas systems for genome editing in prokaryotes

Genetic analysis is crucial to the understanding, exploitation, and control of microorganisms. The advent of CRISPR-Cas-based genome-editing techniques, particularly those mediated by the single-effector (Cas9 and Cas12a) class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems, has revolutionized the genetics in model eukaryotic organisms. However, their applications in prokaryotes are rather limited, largely owing to the exceptional diversity of DNA homeostasis in microorganisms and severe cytotoxicity of overexpressing these nuclease proteins in certain genotypes. Remarkably, CRISPR-Cas systems belonging to different classes and types are continuously identified in prokaryotic genomes and serve as a deep reservoir for expansion of the CRISPR-based genetic toolkits. ~90% of the CRISPR-Cas systems identified so far belong to the class 1 system which hinges on multi-protein effector complexes for DNA interference. Harnessing these widespread native CRISPR-Cas systems for 'built-in' genome editing represents an emerging and powerful genetic tool in prokaryotes, especially in the genetically recalcitrant non-model species and strains. In this progress review, we introduce the general workflow of this emerging editing platform and summarize its establishment in a growing number of prokaryotes by harnessing the most widespread, diverse type I CRISPR-Cas systems present in their genomes. We also discuss the various factors affecting the success and efficiency of this editing platform and the corresponding solutions.

Structures and Strategies of Anti-CRISPR-Mediated Immune Suppression

More than 50 protein families have been identified that inhibit CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas-mediated adaptive immune systems. Here, we analyze the available anti-CRISPR (Acr) structures and describe common themes and unique mechanisms of stoichiometric and enzymatic suppressors of CRISPR-Cas. Stoichiometric inhibitors often function as molecular decoys of protein-binding partners or nucleic acid targets, while enzymatic suppressors covalently modify Cas ribonucleoprotein complexes or degrade immune signaling molecules. We review mechanistic insights that have been revealed by structures of Acrs, discuss some of the trade-offs associated with each of these strategies, and highlight how Acrs are regulated and deployed in the race to overcome adaptive immunity.

Anti-CRISPR Proteins in Archaea

Anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins are natural inhibitors of CRISPR-Cas immune systems. To date, Acrs inhibiting types I, II, III, V, and VI CRISPR-Cas systems have been characterized. While most known Acrs are derived from bacterial phages and prophages, very few have been characterized in the domain Archaea, despite the nearly ubiquitous presence of CRISPR-Cas in archaeal cells. Here we summarize the discovery and characterization of the archaeal Acrs with the representatives encoded by a model archaeal virus, Sulfolobus islandicus rod-shaped virus 2 (SIRV2). AcrID1 inhibits subtype I-D CRISPR-Cas immunity through direct interaction with the large subunit Cas10d of the effector complex, and AcrIIIB1 inhibits subtype III-B CRISPR-Cas immunity through a mechanism interfering with middle/late gene targeting. Future development of efficient screening methods will be key to uncovering the diversity of archaeal Acrs.

Critical Anti-CRISPR Locus Repression by a Bi-functional Cas9 Inhibitor

Bacteriophages must rapidly deploy anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) to inactivate the RNA-guided nucleases that enforce CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity in their bacterial hosts. Listeria monocytogenes temperate phages encode up to three anti-Cas9 proteins, with acrIIA1 always present. AcrIIA1 binds and inhibits Cas9 with its C-terminal domain; however, the function of its highly conserved N-terminal domain (NTD) is unknown. Here, we report that the AcrIIA1^NTD is a critical transcriptional repressor of the strong anti-CRISPR promoter. A rapid burst of anti-CRISPR transcription occurs during phage infection and the subsequent negative feedback by AcrIIA1^NTD is required for optimal phage replication, even in the absence of CRISPR-Cas immunity. In the presence of CRISPR-Cas immunity, full-length AcrIIA1 uses its two-domain architecture to act as a "Cas9 sensor," tuning acr expression according to Cas9 levels. Finally, we identify AcrIIA1^NTD homologs in other Firmicutes and demonstrate that they have been co-opted by hosts as "anti-anti-CRISPRs," repressing phage anti-CRISPR deployment.

Exploitation of the Cooperative Behaviors of Anti-CRISPR Phages

Bacteriophages encoding anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) must cooperate to overcome phage resistance mediated by the bacterial immune system CRISPR-Cas, where the first phage blocks CRISPR-Cas immunity in order to allow a second Acr phage to successfully replicate. However, in nature, bacteria are frequently not pre-immunized, and phage populations are often not clonal, exhibiting variations in Acr presence and strength. We explored how interactions between Acr phages and initially sensitive bacteria evolve, both in the presence and absence of competing phages lacking Acrs. We find that Acr phages benefit “Acr-negative” phages by limiting the evolution of CRISPR-based resistance and helping Acr-negative phages to replicate on resistant host sub-populations. These benefits depend on the strength of CRISPR-Cas inhibitors and result in strong Acrs providing smaller fitness advantages than weaker ones when Acr phages compete with Acr-negative phages. These results indicate that different Acr types shape the evolutionary dynamics and social interactions of phage populations in natural communities.

•

Acr-positive phages limit evolution of CRISPR resistance during clonal and mixed infections

•

Acr-positive phages provide benefits to Acr-negative phages present in the community

•

Strong Acr help Acr-negative phages to amplify on immunosuppressed CRISPR-resistant cells

•

Weaker Acr provides larger advantages during competition with Acr-negative phages

Bioinformatics Identification of Anti-CRISPR Loci by Using Homology, Guilt-by-Association, and CRISPR Self-Targeting Spacer Approaches

As a naturally occurring adaptive immune system, CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats–CRISPR-associated genes) systems are widely found in bacteria and archaea to defend against viruses. Since 2013, the application of various bacterial CRISPR-Cas systems has become very popular due to their development into targeted and programmable genome engineering tools with the ability to edit almost any genome. As the natural off-switch of CRISPR-Cas systems, anti-CRISPRs have a great potential to serve as regulators of CRISPR-Cas tools and enable safer and more controllable genome editing. This study will help understand the relative usefulness of the three bioinformatics approaches for new Acr discovery, as well as guide the future development of new bioinformatics tools to facilitate anti-CRISPR research. The thousands of Acr homologs and hundreds of new anti-CRISPR loci identified in this study will be a valuable data resource for genome engineers to search for new CRISPR-Cas regulators.

Anti-CRISPR (Acr) loci/operons encode Acr proteins and Acr-associated (Aca) proteins. Forty-five Acr families have been experimentally characterized inhibiting seven subtypes of CRISPR-Cas systems. We have developed a bioinformatics pipeline to identify genomic loci containing Acr homologs and/or Aca homologs by combining three computational approaches: homology, guilt-by-association, and self-targeting spacers. Homology search found thousands of Acr homologs in bacterial and viral genomes, but most are homologous to AcrIIA7 and AcrIIA9. Investigating the gene neighborhood of these Acr homologs revealed that only a small percentage (23.0% in bacteria and 8.2% in viruses) of them have neighboring Aca homologs and thus form Acr-Aca operons. Surprisingly, although a self-targeting spacer is a strong indicator of the presence of Acr genes in a genome, a large percentage of Acr-Aca loci are found in bacterial genomes without self-targeting spacers or even without complete CRISPR-Cas systems. Additionally, for Acr homologs from genomes with self-targeting spacers, homology-based Acr family assignments do not always agree with the self-targeting CRISPR-Cas subtypes. Last, by investigating Acr genomic loci coexisting with self-targeting spacers in the same genomes, five known subtypes (I-C, I-E, I-F, II-A, and II-C) and five new subtypes (I-B, III-A, III-B, IV-A, and V-U4) of Acrs were inferred. Based on these findings, we conclude that the discovery of new anti-CRISPRs should not be restricted to genomes with self-targeting spacers and loci with Acr homologs. The evolutionary arms race of CRISPR-Cas systems and anti-CRISPR systems may have driven the adaptive and rapid gain and loss of these elements in closely related genomes.

IMPORTANCE As a naturally occurring adaptive immune system, CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats–CRISPR-associated genes) systems are widely found in bacteria and archaea to defend against viruses. Since 2013, the application of various bacterial CRISPR-Cas systems has become very popular due to their development into targeted and programmable genome engineering tools with the ability to edit almost any genome. As the natural off-switch of CRISPR-Cas systems, anti-CRISPRs have a great potential to serve as regulators of CRISPR-Cas tools and enable safer and more controllable genome editing. This study will help understand the relative usefulness of the three bioinformatics approaches for new Acr discovery, as well as guide the future development of new bioinformatics tools to facilitate anti-CRISPR research. The thousands of Acr homologs and hundreds of new anti-CRISPR loci identified in this study will be a valuable data resource for genome engineers to search for new CRISPR-Cas regulators.