Rad18 mediates specific mutational signatures and shapes the genomic landscape of carcinogen-induced tumors in vivo

Adaptive use of error-prone DNA polymerases provides flexibility in genome replication during tumorigenesis

Human cells possess many different polymerase enzymes, which collaborate in conducting DNA replication and genome maintenance to ensure faithful duplication of genetic material. Each polymerase performs a specialized role, together providing a balance of accuracy and flexibility to the replication process. Perturbed replication increases the requirement for flexibility to ensure duplication of the entire genome. Flexibility is provided via the use of error-prone polymerases, which maintain the progression of challenged DNA replication at the expense of mutagenesis, an enabling characteristic of cancer. This review describes our recent understanding of mechanisms that alter the usage of polymerases during tumorigenesis and examines the implications of this for cell survival and tumor progression. Although expression levels of polymerases are often misregulated in cancers, this does not necessarily alter polymerase usage since an additional regulatory step may govern the use of these enzymes. We therefore also examine how the regulatory mechanisms of DNA polymerases, such as Rad18-mediated PCNA ubiquitylation, may impact the functionalization of error-prone polymerases to tolerate oncogene-induced replication stress. Crucially, it is becoming increasingly evident that cancer cells utilize error-prone polymerases to sustain ongoing replication in response to oncogenic mutations which inactivate key DNA replication and repair pathways, such as BRCA deficiency. This accelerates mutagenesis and confers chemoresistance, but also presents a dependency that can potentially be exploited by therapeutics.

RAD18 directs DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination to post-replicative chromatin

RAD18 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that prevents replication fork collapse by promoting DNA translesion synthesis and template switching. Besides this classical role, RAD18 has been implicated in homologous recombination; however, this function is incompletely understood. Here, we show that RAD18 is recruited to DNA lesions by monoubiquitination of histone H2A at K15 and counteracts accumulation of 53BP1. Super-resolution microscopy revealed that RAD18 localizes to the proximity of DNA double strand breaks and limits the distribution of 53BP1 to the peripheral chromatin nanodomains. Whereas auto-ubiquitination of RAD18 mediated by RAD6 inhibits its recruitment to DNA breaks, interaction with SLF1 promotes RAD18 accumulation at DNA breaks in the post-replicative chromatin by recognition of histone H4K20me0. Surprisingly, suppression of 53BP1 function by RAD18 is not involved in homologous recombination and rather leads to reduction of non-homologous end joining. Instead, we provide evidence that RAD18 promotes HR repair by recruiting the SMC5/6 complex to DNA breaks. Finally, we identified several new loss-of-function mutations in RAD18 in cancer patients suggesting that RAD18 could be involved in cancer development.

Strand-resolved mutagenicity of DNA damage and repair

DNA base damage is a major source of oncogenic mutations1. Such damage can produce strand-phased mutation patterns and multiallelic variation through the process of lesion segregation2. Here we exploited these properties to reveal how strand-asymmetric processes, such as replication and transcription, shape DNA damage and repair. Despite distinct mechanisms of leading and lagging strand replication3,4, we observe identical fidelity and damage tolerance for both strands. For small alkylation adducts of DNA, our results support a model in which the same translesion polymerase is recruited on-the-fly to both replication strands, starkly contrasting the strand asymmetric tolerance of bulky UV-induced adducts5. The accumulation of multiple distinct mutations at the site of persistent lesions provides the means to quantify the relative efficiency of repair processes genome wide and at single-base resolution. At multiple scales, we show DNA damage-induced mutations are largely shaped by the influence of DNA accessibility on repair efficiency, rather than gradients of DNA damage. Finally, we reveal specific genomic conditions that can actively drive oncogenic mutagenesis by corrupting the fidelity of nucleotide excision repair. These results provide insight into how strand-asymmetric mechanisms underlie the formation, tolerance and repair of DNA damage, thereby shaping cancer genome evolution.

Role of Rad18 in B cell activation and lymphomagenesis

Maintenance of genome integrity is instrumental in preventing cancer. In addition to DNA repair pathways that prevent damage to DNA, damage tolerance pathways allow for the survival of cells that encounter DNA damage during replication. The Rad6/18 pathway is instrumental in this process, mediating damage bypass by ubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Previous studies have shown different roles of Rad18 in vivo and in tumorigenesis. Here, we show that B cells induce Rad18 expression upon proliferation induction. We have therefore analysed the role of Rad18 in B cell activation as well as in B cell lymphomagenesis mediated by an Eµ-Myc transgene. We find no activation defects or survival differences between Rad18 WT mice and two different models of Rad18 deficient tumour mice. Also, tumour subtypes do not differ between the mouse models. Accordingly, functions of Rad18 in B cell activation and tumorigenesis may be compensated for by other pathways in B cells.

Roles of trans-lesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases in tumorigenesis and cancer therapy

DNA damage tolerance and mutagenesis are hallmarks and enabling characteristics of neoplastic cells that drive tumorigenesis and allow cancer cells to resist therapy. The 'Y-family' trans-lesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases enable cells to replicate damaged genomes, thereby conferring DNA damage tolerance. Moreover, Y-family DNA polymerases are inherently error-prone and cause mutations. Therefore, TLS DNA polymerases are potential mediators of important tumorigenic phenotypes. The skin cancer-propensity syndrome xeroderma pigmentosum-variant (XPV) results from defects in the Y-family DNA Polymerase Pol eta (Polη) and compensatory deployment of alternative inappropriate DNA polymerases. However, the extent to which dysregulated TLS contributes to the underlying etiology of other human cancers is unclear. Here we consider the broad impact of TLS polymerases on tumorigenesis and cancer therapy. We survey the ways in which TLS DNA polymerases are pathologically altered in cancer. We summarize evidence that TLS polymerases shape cancer genomes, and review studies implicating dysregulated TLS as a driver of carcinogenesis. Because many cancer treatment regimens comprise DNA-damaging agents, pharmacological inhibition of TLS is an attractive strategy for sensitizing tumors to genotoxic therapies. Therefore, we discuss the pharmacological tractability of the TLS pathway and summarize recent progress on development of TLS inhibitors for therapeutic purposes.

Leveraging the replication stress response to optimize cancer therapy

High-fidelity DNA replication is critical for the faithful transmission of genetic information to daughter cells. Following genotoxic stress, specialized DNA damage tolerance pathways are activated to ensure replication fork progression. These pathways include translesion DNA synthesis, template switching and repriming. In this Review, we describe how DNA damage tolerance pathways impact genome stability, their connection with tumorigenesis and their effects on cancer therapy response. We discuss recent findings that single-strand DNA gap accumulation impacts chemoresponse and explore a growing body of evidence that suggests that different DNA damage tolerance factors, including translesion synthesis polymerases, template switching proteins and enzymes affecting single-stranded DNA gaps, represent useful cancer targets. We further outline how the consequences of DNA damage tolerance mechanisms could inform the discovery of new biomarkers to refine cancer therapies.

Impacts of arsenic on Rad18 and translesion synthesis

Arsenite interferes with DNA repair protein function resulting in the retention of UV-induced DNA damage. Accumulated DNA damage promotes replication stress which is bypassed by DNA damage tolerance pathways such as translesion synthesis (TLS). Rad18 is an essential factor in initiating TLS through PCNA monoubiquitination and contains two functionally and structurally distinct zinc fingers that are potential targets for arsenite binding. Arsenite treatment displaced zinc from endogenous Rad18 protein and mass spectrometry analysis revealed arsenite binding to both the Rad18 RING finger and UBZ domains. Consequently, arsenite inhibited Rad18 RING finger dependent PCNA monoubiquitination and polymerase eta recruitment to DNA damage in UV exposed keratinocytes, both of which enhance the bypass of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers during replication. Further analysis demonstrated multiple effects of arsenite, including the reduction in nuclear localization and UV-induced chromatin recruitment of Rad18 and its binding partner Rad6, which may also negatively impact TLS initiation. Arsenite and Rad18 knockdown in UV exposed keratinocytes significantly increased markers of replication stress and DNA strand breaks to a similar degree, suggesting arsenite mediates its effects through Rad18. Comet assay analysis confirmed an increase in both UV-induced single-stranded DNA and DNA double-strand breaks in arsenite treated keratinocytes compared to UV alone. Altogether, this study supports a mechanism by which arsenite inhibits TLS through the altered activity and regulation of Rad18. Arsenite elevated the levels of UV-induced replication stress and consequently, single-stranded DNA gaps and DNA double-strand breaks. These potentially mutagenic outcomes support a role for TLS in the cocarcinogenicity of arsenite.

Assessment of genotoxic chemicals using chemogenomic profiling based on gene-knockout library in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Understanding the adverse effects of genotoxic chemicals and identifying them effectively from non-genotoxic chemicals are of great worldwide concerns. Here, Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) genome-wide single-gene knockout screening approach was conducted to assess two genotoxic chemicals (4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4-NQO) and formaldehyde (FA)) and environmental pollutant dichloroacetic acid (DCA, genotoxicity is controversial). DNA repair was significant enriched in the gene ontology (GO) biology process (BP) terms and KEGG pathways when exposed to low concentrations of 4-NQO and FA. Higher concentrations of 4-NQO and FA influenced some RNA metabolic and biosynthesis pathways. Moreover, replication and repair associated pathways were top ranked KEGG pathways with high fold-change for low concentrations of 4-NQO and FA. The similar gene profiles perturbed by DCA with three test concentrations identified, the common GO BP terms associated with aromatic amino acid family biosynthetic process and ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process via the multivesicular body sorting pathway. DCA has no obvious genotoxicity as there was no enriched DNA damage and repair pathways and fold-change of replication and repair KEGG pathways were very low. Five genes (RAD18, RAD59, MUS81, MMS4, and BEM4) could serve as candidate genes for genotoxic chemicals. Overall, the yeast functional genomic profiling showed great performance for assessing the signatures and potential molecular mechanisms of genotoxic chemicals.

Dimensionality reduction by UMAP reinforces sample heterogeneity analysis in bulk transcriptomic data

Transcriptomic analysis plays a key role in biomedical research. Linear dimensionality reduction methods, especially principal-component analysis (PCA), are widely used in detecting sample-to-sample heterogeneity, while recently developed non-linear methods, such as t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) and uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP), can efficiently cluster heterogeneous samples in single-cell RNA sequencing analysis. Yet, the application of t-SNE and UMAP in bulk transcriptomic analysis and comparison with conventional methods have not been achieved. We compare four major dimensionality reduction methods (PCA, multidimensional scaling [MDS], t-SNE, and UMAP) in analyzing 71 large bulk transcriptomic datasets. UMAP is superior to PCA and MDS but shows some advantages over t-SNE in differentiating batch effects, identifying pre-defined biological groups, and revealing in-depth clusters in two-dimensional space. Importantly, UMAP generates sample clusters uncovering biological features and clinical meaning. We recommend deploying UMAP in visualizing and analyzing sizable bulk transcriptomic datasets to reinforce sample heterogeneity analysis.

Translesion Synthesis or Repair by Specialized DNA Polymerases Limits Excessive Genomic Instability upon Replication Stress

DNA can experience "replication stress", an important source of genome instability, induced by various external or endogenous impediments that slow down or stall DNA synthesis. While genome instability is largely documented to favor both tumor formation and heterogeneity, as well as drug resistance, conversely, excessive instability appears to suppress tumorigenesis and is associated with improved prognosis. These findings support the view that karyotypic diversity, necessary to adapt to selective pressures, may be limited in tumors so as to reduce the risk of excessive instability. This review aims to highlight the contribution of specialized DNA polymerases in limiting extreme genetic instability by allowing DNA replication to occur even in the presence of DNA damage, to either avoid broken forks or favor their repair after collapse. These mechanisms and their key regulators Rad18 and Polθ not only offer diversity and evolutionary advantage by increasing mutagenic events, but also provide cancer cells with a way to escape anti-cancer therapies that target replication forks.

Unravelling roles of error-prone DNA polymerases in shaping cancer genomes

Mutagenesis is a key hallmark and enabling characteristic of cancer cells, yet the diverse underlying mutagenic mechanisms that shape cancer genomes are not understood. This review will consider the emerging challenge of determining how DNA damage response pathways-both tolerance and repair-act upon specific forms of DNA damage to generate mutations characteristic of tumors. DNA polymerases are typically the ultimate mutagenic effectors of DNA repair pathways. Therefore, understanding the contributions of DNA polymerases is critical to develop a more comprehensive picture of mutagenic mechanisms in tumors. Selection of an appropriate DNA polymerase-whether error-free or error-prone-for a particular DNA template is critical to the maintenance of genome stability. We review different modes of DNA polymerase dysregulation including mutation, polymorphism, and over-expression of the polymerases themselves or their associated activators. Based upon recent findings connecting DNA polymerases with specific mechanisms of mutagenesis, we propose that compensation for DNA repair defects by error-prone polymerases may be a general paradigm molding the mutational landscape of cancer cells. Notably, we demonstrate that correlation of error-prone polymerase expression with mutation burden in a subset of patient tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas can identify mechanistic hypotheses for further testing. We contrast experimental approaches from broad, genome-wide strategies to approaches with a narrower focus on a few hundred base pairs of DNA. In addition, we consider recent developments in computational annotation of patient tumor data to identify patterns of mutagenesis. Finally, we discuss the innovations and future experiments that will develop a more comprehensive portrait of mutagenic mechanisms in human tumors.