Diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy: when and how to use biochemical markers and non-invasive methods; when bone biopsy is needed

The Role of Bone Biopsy in the Management of CKD-MBD

A bone biopsy is still considered the gold standard for diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy. It allows to measure both static and dynamic parameters of bone remodeling and is the only method able to evaluate mineralization and allows analysis of both cortical and trabecular bone. Although bone volume can be measured indirectly by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, mineralization defects, bone metal deposits, cellular number/activity, and even turnover abnormalities are difficult to determine by techniques other than qualitative bone histomorphometry. In this review, we evaluate the role of bone biopsy in the clinical practice.

The use of bone turnover markers in chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorders

Bone turnover markers assist in fracture risk prediction, management and monitoring of osteoporosis in patients without chronic kidney disease (CKD). The use in CKD-mineral bone disorder (MBD) has been limited as many of these markers and breakdown products are renally excreted, including the most commonly used and well standardized procollagen type I N propeptide and C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen. Of the markers unaffected by renal function, bone specific alkaline phosphatase is associated with mortality and fracture rate in CKD subjects and is now available on several automated analysers. When used in combination with PTH, bone specific alkaline phosphatase as a bone formation marker correlated well with bone biopsy histomorphometry in predicting adynamic bone disease. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b is a resorption marker that is under development for automation. Both high and low bone turnover in CKD-MBD patients are associated with increased fracture and mortality risk. Bone biopsy as the gold standard to differentiate between adynamic bone disease and osteitis fibrosa is limited by availability and cost. Appropriate use of bone turnover markers is vital in the decision to commence anti-resorptive agents, and to monitor efficacy in order to avoid over suppression of bone turnover, which may lead to stress fractures. Further efforts are required to develop markers unaffected by renal function with standardized cut-off values and fracture as well as vascular calcification end-points.

Risk factors and clinical course of hungry bone syndrome after total parathyroidectomy in dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism

Background

Hungry bone syndrome (HBS) is an important postoperative complication after parathyroidectomy for severe secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). There is, however, little data in the literature on its detailed clinical course, and the associated risk factors remain controversial.

Methods

We did a single-center retrospective study on 62 consecutive dialysis patients who underwent total parathyroidectomy for SHPT to examine the risk factors, clinical course and outcome. Data on demographic characteristics, perioperative laboratory parameters including serum calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and parathyroid hormone (PTH), drug treatment for SHPT and operative details of parathyroidectomy were collected.

Results

Seventeen (27.4%) patients developed severe postoperative hypocalcemia with HBS. The serum calcium dropped progressively while serum ALP rose after operation until 2 weeks later when serum calcium reached the trough and serum ALP peaked. Serum phosphate also fell but stabilized between 4 and 14 days. The total postoperative calcium and vitamin D supplementation was significantly larger, and hospital stay was significantly longer in the group with HBS as compared with those without HBS. Young age, high body weight, high preoperative ALP level, and low preoperative calcium level independently predicted the development of HBS while preoperative PTH and use of cinacalcet or paricalcitol did not.

Conclusion

HBS was common after total parathyroidectomy in patients with SHPT, and it is important to closely monitor the postoperative serum calcium, phosphate and ALP levels in the following 2 weeks, especially for those at risk. The implications of our findings on perioperative management are discussed.

Bisphophonates in CKD patients with low bone mineral density

Patients with chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) have a high risk of bone fracture because of low bone mineral density and poor bone quality. Osteoporosis also features low bone mass, disarranged microarchitecture, and skeletal fragility, and differentiating between osteoporosis and CKD-MBD in low bone mineral density is a challenge and usually achieved by bone biopsy. Bisphosphonates can be safe and beneficial for patients with a glomerular filtration rate of 30 mL/min or higher, but prescribing bisphosphonates in advanced CKD requires caution because of the increased possibility of low bone turnover disorders such as osteomalacia, mixed uremic osteodystrophy, and adynamic bone, even aggravating hyperparathyroidism. Therefore, bone biopsy in advanced CKD is an important consideration before prescribing bisphosphonates. Treatment also may induce hypocalcemia in CKD patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism, but vitamin D supplementation may ameliorate this effect. Bisphosphonate treatment can improve both bone mineral density and vascular calcification, but the latter becomes more unlikely in patients with stage 3-4 CKD with vascular calcification but no decreased bone mineral density. Using bisphosphonates requires considerable caution in advanced CKD, and the lack of adequate clinical investigation necessitates more studies regarding its effects on these patients.

Optimization of the tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase detection by histochemical method

According to the new kidney disease improving global outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, the term of renal osteodystrophy, should be used exclusively in reference to the invasive diagnosis of bone abnormalities. Due to the low sensitivity and specificity of biochemical serum markers of bone remodelling, the performance of bone biopsies is highly stimulated in dialysis patients and after kidney transplantation. The tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP) is an iso-enzyme of the group of acid phosphatases, which is highly expressed by activated osteoclasts and macrophages. TRACP in osteoclasts is in intracytoplasmic vesicles that transport the products of bone matrix degradation. Being present in activated osteoclasts, the identification of this enzyme by histochemistry in undecalcified bone biopsies is an excellent method to quantify the resorption of bone. Since it is an enzymatic histochemical method for a thermolabile enzyme, the temperature at which it is performed is particularly relevant. This study aimed to determine the optimal temperature for identification of TRACP in activated osteoclasts in undecalcified bone biopsies embedded in methylmethacrylate. We selected 10 cases of undecalcified bone biopsies from hemodialysis patients with the diagnosis of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Sections of 5 µm were stained to identify TRACP at different incubation temperatures (37°, 45°, 60°, 70° and 80°C) for 30 minutes. Activated osteoclasts stained red and trabecular bone (mineralized bone) was contrasted with toluidine blue. This approach also increased the visibility of the trabecular bone resorption areas (Howship lacunae). Unlike what is suggested in the literature and in several international protocols, we found that the best results were obtained with temperatures between 60°C and 70°C. For technical reasons and according to the results of the present study, we recommended that, for an incubation time of 30 min, the reaction should be carried out at 60°C. As active osteoclasts are usually scarce in a bone section, the standardization of the histochemistry method is of great relevance, to optimize the identification of these cells and increase the accuracy of the histomosphometric results. Our results, allowing an increase in osteoclasts contrast, also support the use of semi-automatic histomorphometric measurements.

Vascular calcifications and renal osteodystrophy in chronic hemodialysis patients: what is the relationship between them?

INTRODUCTION

Vascular calcifications (VCs) and renal osteodystrophy (ROD) are frequently seen together and represent the major causes of morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Some studies suggest a pathogenic link between them, but there is no consensus as yet regarding this issue. The main objective of our study was to establish whether there is any relation between VCs and ROD in our HD patients. We evaluated the prevalence of VCs and ROD and the relationship between VCs and some clinical and biochemical characteristics of HD patients.

METHODS

We examined radiological signs of VCs and ROD on hands and pelvis bone radiographs in 81 chronic HD patients, and we calculated a VC score on this basis.

RESULTS

We found a significant relation between radiological signs of ROD and those of VC (P = 0.019). The patients with ROD had a higher mean VC score (P = 0.02). By linear regression, the VC score correlated directly with serum calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and CaxP product and inversely with serum albumin. The logistic regression model revealed that ROD, male gender and treatment with calcium salts were predictive of VCs development. There were no associations between VCs and age, HD vintage, diabetes, dialysate Ca concentration, vitamin D treatment, spKt/V, URR and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.

CONCLUSION

There seems to be a pathogenetic link between bone and artery diseases in chronic HD patients. Both VCs and ROD have a high prevalence. ROD, male gender and treatment with calcium salts are risk factors for VCs.

Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in chronic renal disease

Osteoporosis is the most prevalent metabolic bone disease leading to low-trauma (fragility) fractures worldwide. There is no reason why osteoporosis, as defined by different criteria, cannot accompany the derangements in bone metabolism that characterize chronic kidney disease (CKD). In fact, osteoporosis could and should be included in the broad characterization of CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD), as recently proposed by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes working group. The pathophysiology leading to osteoporosis or CKD-MBD shares many common yet distinctly different pathways. Both pathways may lead to impairment of bone strength and low-trauma fractures. The challenge for clinical practice is how to discriminate between osteoporosis and CKD-MBD in fracturing patients. There is agreement that in the absence of aberrant biochemical tests suggesting CKD-MBD in stages 1 through 3 CKD, osteoporosis can be diagnosed using the World Health Organization criteria or development of low-trauma fractures. The distinction between osteoporosis and CKD-MBD becomes more difficult in stages 4 and 5 through 5D CKD. In fracturing patients with these levels of severe CKD, careful biochemical assessment of bone turnover markers and, in selected cases, bone biopsy is needed to eliminate CKD-MBD and to diagnose osteoporosis by exclusion. In stages 1 through 3 CKD, the current registered osteoporosis pharmacologic therapies can be used to treat osteoporosis. In stage 4, 5, and 5D these agents can be considered off-label, but only after very careful considerations and only in fracturing patients without CKD-MBD. We need better noninvasive means of discriminating among all these metabolic bone diseases and prospective data to guide us to the use of agents that alter bone remodeling in high-risk patients with more severe CKD.

Clinical significance of bone alkaline phosphatase isoforms, including the novel B1x isoform, in mild to moderate chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Mineral bone disorder (MBD) is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) even during the early stages. Bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) is a marker of bone formation and plays a pivotal role in the mineralization process. Three BALP isoforms (B/I, B1 and B2) have been identified in healthy individuals and a fourth isoform (B1x) has been discovered in serum from dialysis patients. We investigated these BALP isoforms, type I procollagen intact amino-terminal propeptide (PINP), carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRACP5b), as well as bone mineral density (BMD) in predialysis CKD patients.

METHODS

PINP, CTX, TRACP5b and BALP isoforms were analysed in serum from 46 patients within CKD stages 3-5. BMD was determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

PINP, TRACP5b and the BALP isoforms, B/I, B1 and B2, were independent predictors of total hip BMD in all patients. Furthermore, B/I predicted osteopaenia in the hip and in the distal 1/3 of the radius in CKD stage 3. The B1x isoform was detected in nine patients (20%), who had lower GFR, higher phosphate and calcium x phosphate product.

CONCLUSION

We found an association of BALP isoforms and other markers of bone turnover with total hip BMD, which predominantly comprises trabecular bone. The association of the new BALP isoform B1x with risk factors for vascular calcification leads us to hypothesize a possible role for B1x in this process. The significance of the BALP isoforms in CKD remains to be further explored in experimental and clinical settings in conjunction with bone histomorphometry.

The role of bone biopsy in patients with chronic renal failure

Renal bone disease is a heterogeneous group of metabolic bone diseases that requires quantitative bone histomorphometry to make the correct differential diagnosis. Included in this group is osteoporosis. However, osteoporosis in stage 4 to 5 chronic kidney disease cannot be diagnosed on the basis of bone mineral density criteria established by the World Health Organization or the presence of fragility fractures because patients with all forms of renal bone disease can demonstrate low bone mineral density and fragility fractures. Clinical cases in patients with either low bone mineral density and/or low-trauma fractures will be used to demonstrate the value of bone biopsy and quantitative histomorphometry in making a diagnosis of the specific renal bone disease and assisting with subsequent management decisions.

Comparison of Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover in Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis and Maintenance Hemodialysis

The aim of this study was to compare the biochemical markers of bone formation - bone isoenzyme alkaline phosphatase, /BALP/ bone resorption - tartarat resistant acid phosphatase /TRAP/ and parameters of bone turnover (Ca, P and iPTH) between 108 patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and 112 patients on hemodialysis (HD). Parameters were determined by spectrophotometry (TRAP, Ca, P), electrochemiluminiscent method (iPTH) and electrophoresis (BALP). There was significant correlation between BALP levels of CAPD patients and Ca values of HD patients (r = 0.216, p < 0.05), but comparison of P, iPTH and BALP showed no significant difference between the groups. We found significant correlation between BALP and TRAP (r = 0.570, p < 0.01) and BALP and iPTH values (r = 0.551, p < 0.01) in HD patients. Also, significant correlations in CAPD patients between BALP and TRAP (r = 0.194, p < 0.05) and BALP and iPTH values (r = 0.283, p < 0.01) were found. Our results suggest that the effect of CAPD and HD on bone turnover may be monitored most conclusively via BALP levels. This biochemical marker is a very good index of bone turnover in patients undergoing dialysis and it could indicate an early stage of decreased bone turnover.

Diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy

The idiom renal osteodystrophy (ROD) represents a heterogeneous pattern of bone disturbances caused by chronic renal insufficiency and concomitant diseases. For the clinical decision of therapy it is most important to differentiate between high and low or adynamic turnover ROD because the therapeutically consequences of these two ends of the ROD spectrum are fundamentally different. Bone histology remains the gold standard for the exact classification of ROD. Serological markers of bone metabolism are not suited for the accurate nomenclature of ROD but are useful for the sequential follow up of ROD after a clear diagnosis has been made. Similarly, radiological diagnosis of ROD using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) or quantitative computer tomography scan (q-CT) is inaccurate and thus more suited for the routine follow up of established disease. Besides mineralization, bone strength and the rate of fractures are strongly determined by the architecture of the bone matrix. This information, however, is also only available on bone biopsy sections and cannot be estimated by non-invasive diagnostic methods. In summary, bone biopsy should be used more liberally for correct classification of bone disease. The sequential follow up and guidance of therapy success can be performed by non-invasive procedures such as biochemical bone marker determination in blood. X-ray imaging and densitometry is suitable only for sequential evaluation of osteoporosis.

Development of renal bone disease

Renal osteodystrophy (ROD) develops as the early stages of chronic renal failure (CRF) and covers a spectrum of bone changes observed in the uraemic patient, which extend from high remodelling bone disease (frequently known as osteitis fibrosa) to low turnover, or adynamic disease. Between these two extremes there are also cases of bone mineralization compromised in variable degrees, as is the case of 'mixed bone disease' and osteomalacia. The dynamic process of bone remodelling is compromised in CRF, and a positive or negative bone balance can be observed in uraemic patients. In addition to the classic modulators of bone remodelling, like parathyroid hormone, calcitriol and calcitonin, other factors were recently identified as significant modulators of osteoblast and osteoclast activation in uraemic patients. In fact, different cytokines and growth factors, acting at an autocrine or paracrine level, seem to play a relevant role in the bone and mineral changes observed in uraemia. Recently, observations have been made of the development of more sensitive and specific techniques to assay different biochemical markers of bone turnover and mineral metabolism. Analogously, new contributions of conventional bone histology, bone immunocytochemistry and molecular biology, which enabled the understanding of some etiopathogenic mechanisms of ROD, were observed.

Access to Quality: Evaluation of the Allocation of Deceased Donor Kidneys for Transplantation

Disparities in both access to the kidney transplant waiting list and waiting times for transplant candidates have been extensively documented with regard to ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic factors, and region. However, the issue of access to equivalent quality organs has garnered less attention. The principal aim of this study was to determine whether certain patient populations were more likely to receive lower quality organs. This was a retrospective cohort study of all deceased-donor adult renal transplant recipients in the United States from 1996 to 2002 (n = 45,832). Using previously reported categorization of donor quality (I to V), the propensity of transplant recipients to receive lower-quality kidneys in a cumulative logit model was evaluated. Older patients were progressively more likely to receive lower-quality organs (age > or = 65 yr, odds ratio [OR] = 2.1, P < 0.01) relative to recipients aged 18 to 24 yr. African American and Asian recipients had a greater likelihood of receiving lower-quality organs relative to non-Hispanic Caucasians. Regional allocation networks were highly variable with regard to donor quality. Neither recipient gender (OR = 1.00, P = 0.81) nor patient's primary diagnosis were associated with donor quality. Findings suggest that disparities in the quality of deceased donor kidneys to transplant recipients exist among certain patient groups that have previously documented access barriers. The extent to which these disparities are in line with broad policies of equity and potentially modifiable will have to be examined in the context of allocation policy.

Treatment of osteoporosis in chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease

As glomerular filtration rate (GFR) declines from age-related bone loss or disease that specifically induces a decline in GFR, there are a number of metabolic bone conditions that may accompany the decline in GFR. These metabolic bone conditions span a spectrum from mild-to-severe secondary hyperparathyroidism in early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) to the development of additional heterogeneous forms of bone diseases each with its distinctly quantitative bone histomorphometric characteristics. Osteoporosis can also develop in patients with CKD and ESRD for many reasons beyond age-related bone loss and postmenopausal bone loss. The diagnosis of osteoporosis in patients with severe CKD or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is not as easy to do as it is in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO)--neither fragility fractures nor The World Health Organization bone mineral density criteria can be used to diagnose osteoporosis in this population since all forms of renal bone disease may fracture or have low "T scores". The diagnosis of osteoporosis in patients with CKD/ESRD must be done by first the exclusion of the other forms of renal osteodystrophy, by biochemical profiling or by double tetracycline-labeled bone biopsy; and the finding of low trabecular bone volume. In such patients, preliminary data would suggest that oral bisphosphonates seem to be safe and effective down to GFR levels of 15 mL/min. In patients with stage 5 CKD who are fracturing because of osteoporosis or who are on chronic glucocorticoids, reducing the oral bisphosphonate dosage to half of its usual prescribed dosing for PMO seems reasonable from known bisphosphonate pharmacokinetics, though we do need better scientific data to fully understand bisphosphonate usage in this population.

The clinical significance of serum osteocalcin and N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen in predialysis patients with chronic renal failure

Several new serum markers for bone metabolism have recently become available and are being applied to clinical practice. Their clinical usefulness in predialysis patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), however, has not yet been determined. Serum levels of three bone formation markers-bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), osteocalcin (OC), and N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP)-and three bone resorption markers-type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptide (NTx), deoxypyridinoline (DPD), and pyridinoline (PYD)-were measured simultaneously in 85 predialysis CRF patients (serum creatinine 3.5 +/- 1.9 mg/dl, 61.0 +/- 10.9 years old, 54 males and 31 females, 36 diabetics and 49 nondiabetics) to examine the relationships between these markers and bone mineral density (BMD) of the distal radius, as measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). Trabecular BMD, which is strongly affected by bone metabolism, was significantly negatively correlated with each of the bone formation markers (r=-0.341, p=0.0016, for OC; r=-0.314, p=0.0036, for PINP; r=-0.238, p=0.0315, for BAP), but there was no significant correlation between BMD and any of the bone resorption markers. In multivariate regression analyses (adjusted by age, sex, presence of diabetes, glomerular filtration rate, intact parathyroid hormone, calcium, phosphate, and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D), OC and PINP were significantly associated with a decrease in BMD, but BAP was not. In conclusion, we demonstrated that in predialysis CRF patients, BMD of the distal radius, particularly of trabecular bone, is associated with serum OC and PINP levels. OC and PINP are suggested to be possible parameters for the clinical evaluation of the effect of bone metabolism on BMD.

Treatment of metabolic bone disease in patients with chronic renal disease: A perspective for rheumatologists

As glomerular filtration rate (GFR) declines from age-related bone loss or disease that specifically induces a decline in GFR, there are a number of metabolic bone conditions that may accompany the decline in GFR. These metabolic bone conditions span a spectrum from mild-to-severe secondary hyperparathyroidism in early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) to the development of additional heterogeneous forms of bone diseases each with distinctly quantitative bone histomorphometric characteristics. Osteoporosis can also develop in patients with CKD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) for many reasons beyond age-related bone loss and postmenopausal (PMO) bone loss. Diagnosing osteoporosis in patients with severe CKD or ESRD is not as easy to do as it is in patients with PMO. The diagnosis of osteoporosis in patients with CKD/ESRD must be done by first excluding other forms of renal osteodystrophy, through biochemical profiling or by double tetracycline-labeled bone biopsy and the finding of low trabecular bone volume. In such patients oral bisphosphonates seem to be safe and effective down to GFR levels of 15 mL/min. In patients with stage 5 CKD, who are fracturing because of osteoporosis or who are on chronic glucocorticoids, reducing the oral bisphosphonate dosage to half of its usual prescribed dosing for PMO seems reasonable from known bisphosphonate pharmacokinetics. However, we need better scientific data to fully understand bisphosphonate usage in this population. This paper deals with the evidence available to understand management of patients with CKD and opinions on what might be a reasonable clinical approach where evidence is currently lacking.

Indicações de paratireoidectomia no hiperparatireoidismo secundário à insuficiência renal crônica

O hiperparatireoidismo é uma manifestação comum na insuficiência renal crônica (IRC), com alta morbi-mortalidade e difícil manejo clínico. As indicações clássicas da paratireoidectomia são: hipercalcemia persistente, principalmente após transplante renal, prurido intratável, fraturas patológicas, dor óssea refratária ao tratamento medicamentoso e calcificação metastática. Infelizmente, esta última não responde à paratireoidectomia e a calcificação dos vasos está relacionada ao aumento da mortalidade. Assim, novos critérios para indicação mais precoce de paratireoidectomia são necessários. Níveis séricos de PTH maiores que 10 vezes o limite da normalidade, apesar da adequada reposição de cálcio e calcitriol, produto cálcio x fósforo maior que 70(mg/dl)2, tumor marrom quando é urgente a regressão da massa, artrite e/ou periartrite incapacitantes e ruptura de tendões estão entre outras indicações a serem consideradas. Alguns cuidados são necessários para excluir doenças ósseas concomitantes, como amiloidose e intoxicação por alumínio. Esta revisão visa a orientar os endocrinologistas sobre as indicações e melhor momento de realizar paratireoidectomia no hiperparatireoidismo da IRC.

The renal osteodystrophy pattern in Brazil and Uruguay: an overview

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of the types of renal osteodystrophy (ROD) has changed in the last two decades. This study evaluates the prevalence and determining factors of the types of ROD in two countries in South America.

METHODS

Symptomatic patients who underwent bone biopsies for diagnostic purposes (1985 through 2001) were included in the study. In Brazil, a total of 2340 patients were reviewed, 93.1% on hemodialysis (HD), and 6.9% on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). In Uruguay, 167 patients on hemodialysis were included. Uncalcified bone samples were analyzed in order to diagnose the different types of ROD.

RESULTS

Comparing the 1980s to the 1990s, the prevalence of Brazilian patients with hyperparathyroid bone disease (HP) increased from 32.3% to 44.0%, while Al overload decreased from 61.3% to 42.4%. A logistic regression analysis showed that the main factors associated with HP included female gender, age of less than 40 years, black patients, longer time on dialysis, and absence of Al overload. In Uruguay, HP also increased over time from 31.8% to 70.5% (P < 0.05), while Al overload decreased from 42% to 27% (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A better control of Al overload may lead to a change in histologic pattern, as evidenced by the increasing prevalence of HP.

Bisphosphonates in renal osteodystrophy

The present review considers the role that bisphosphonates might have in patients with renal failure. Although bisphosphonates are widely used to reduce fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis, few studies have documented their effect in patients with renal osteodystrophy. The pathogenesis of bone loss after renal transplantation and the role of the recently identified osteoprotegerin/receptor activating nuclear factor-kappaB system is described. Inhibition of bone resorption may prove beneficial when high bone turnover is present, but there are potential drawbacks to widespread use of bisphosphonates. These issues are discussed, with emphasis placed on reports published within the past 18 months.