Hypertension and long-term renal allograft survival: effect of early glomerular filtration rate

Elevated number of IL-21+ TFH and CD86+CD38+ B cells in blood of renal transplant recipients with AMR under conventional immuno-suppression

The objective of this study is to detect the number of different subsets of TFH and B cells in renal transplant recipients (RTR) with antibody-mediated acute rejection (AMR), acute rejection (AR), chronic rejection (CR), or transplant stable (TS). The present study was a prospective study. The numbers of ICOS +, PD-1+ and IL-21+ TFH, CD86+, CD38+, CD27+, and IgD- B cells in 21 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and post-transplant times were measured by flow cytometry. The level of serum IL-21 was detected by ELISA. The numbers of circulating CD4+CXCR5+, CD4+CXCR5+ICOS+, CD4+CXCR5+PD-1+, CD4+CXCR5+IL-21+ TFH, CD19+CD86+, and CD19 +CD86+CD38+ B cells as well as the level of serum IL-21 in the AMR, AR, and CR groups at post-transplantation were significantly higher than those at pre-transplantation. In contrast, the number of circulating CD19+CD27+IgD B cells was significantly increased in the TS groups in respect to the other groups. Moreover, the numbers of circulating CD4+CXCR5+IL-21+ TFH cells, CD19+CD86+CD38+ B cells as well as the level of serum IL-21 were positive related to the level of serum Cr while showing negative correlated with the values of eGFR in the AMR groups at post-transplantation for 4 and 12 weeks. Circulating TFH cells may be a biomarker in RTR with AMR, which can promote the differentiation of B cells into plasma cells by activating B cells, thereby promoting disease progression.

Polymorphisms in vasoactive eicosanoid genes of kidney donors affect biopsy scores and clinical outcomes in renal transplantation

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes metabolize arachidonic acid to vasoactive eicosanoids such as epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) and 20-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (20-HETE), whilst soluble epoxide hydrolase, encoded by the EPHX2 gene, is in charge of EETs degradation. We aimed to analyze the influence of common, functional polymorphisms in four genes of the donor on the renal biopsy scores independently assigned by pathologists. Additionally, we examined whether this score or the presence of these SNPs were independent risk factors of clinical outcomes in the first year after grafting. A cohort of 119 recipients and their corresponding 85 deceased donors were included in the study. Donors were genotyped for the CYP4F2 V433M, CYP2C8*3, CYP2J2*7, EPHX2 3’UTR A>G, EPHX2 K55R and EPHX2 R287Q polymorphisms. The association of the donors’ SNPs with the biopsy scores and clinical outcomes was retrospectively evaluated by multivariate regression analysis. The CYP2C8*3 polymorphism in the donor was significantly associated with higher scores assigned to pretransplant biopsies [OR = 3.35 (1.03–10.93), p = 0.045]. In turn, higher scores were related to an increased risk of acute rejection [OR = 5.28 (1.32–21.13), p = 0.019] and worse glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (45.68±16.05 vs. 53.04±16.93 ml/min in patients whose grafts had lower scores, p = 0.010) one year after transplant. Patients whose donors carried the CYP4F2 433M variant showed lower eGFR values (48.96±16.89 vs. 55.94±18.62 ml/min in non-carriers, p = 0.038) and higher risk of acute rejection [OR = 6.18 (1.03–37.21), p = 0.047]. The CYP2J2*7 SNP in the donor was associated with elevated risk of delayed graft function [OR = 25.68 (1.52–43.53), p = 0.025]. Our results taken together suggest that donor genetic variability may be used as a predictor of tissue damage in the graft as well as to predict clinical outcomes and graft function in the recipient.

Hypertension after Kidney Transplantation: Clinical Significance and Therapeutical Aspects

Most of the kidney transplanted patients develop arterial hypertension after renal transplantation. Together with very well-known and usual risk factors, post-transplant hypertension contributes to the whole cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the kidney transplant population. The reasons of post-transplant hypertension are factors related to donors and recipients, immunosuppressive therapy like Calcineurin Inhibitors (CNI) and surgery procedures (stenosis and kinking of the renal artery and ureteral obstruction). According to Eighth National Committee (JNC 8) recommendations, blood pressure > 140/90 mmHg is considered as hypertension. The usual antihypertensive drugs used for the control of hypertension are Calcium channel blockers (CCB), Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, Angiotensin -II receptor blockers (ARB), B- blockers and diuretics. Follow the KDIGO guidelines the target blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg for patients without proteinuria and < 125/75 mmHg in patients with proteinuria is recommended. Better control of post-transplant hypertension improves the long-term graft and patient's survival.

Self-Monitoring Kidney Function Post Transplantation: Reliability of Patient-Reported Data

Background

The high frequency of outpatient visits after kidney transplantation is burdensome to both the recovering patient and health care capacity. Self-monitoring kidney function offers a promising strategy to reduce the number of these outpatient visits.

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate whether it is safe to rely on patients’ self-measurements of creatinine and blood pressure, using data from a self-management randomized controlled trial.

Methods

For self-monitoring creatinine, each participant received a StatSensor Xpress-i Creatinine Meter and related test material. For self-monitoring blood pressure, each participant received a Microlife WatchBP Home, an oscillometric device for blood pressure self-measurement on the upper arm. Both devices had a memory function and the option to download stored values to a computer. During the first year post transplantation, 54 patients registered their self-measured creatinine values in a Web-based Self-Management Support System (SMSS) which provided automatic feedback on the registered values (eg, seek contact with hospital). Values registered in the SMSS were compared with those logged automatically in the creatinine device to study reliability of registered data. Adherence to measurement frequency was determined by comparing the number of requested with the number of performed measurements. To study adherence to provided feedback, SMSS-logged feedback and information from the electronic hospital files were analyzed.

Results

Level of adherence was highest during months 2-4 post transplantation with over 90% (42/47) of patients performing at least 75% of the requested measurements. Overall, 87.00% (3448/3963) of all registered creatinine values were entered correctly, although values were often registered several days later. If (the number of) measured and registered values deviated, the mean of registered creatinine values was significantly lower than what was measured, suggesting active selection of lower creatinine values. Adherence to SMSS feedback ranged from 53% (14/24) to 85% (33/39), depending on the specific feedback.

Conclusions

Patients’ tendency to postpone registration and to select lower creatinine values for registration and the suboptimal adherence to the feedback provided by the SMSS might challenge safety. This should be well considered when designing self-monitoring care systems, for example by ensuring that self-measured data are transferred automatically to an SMSS.

Blood pressure profiles 5 to 10 years after transplant in pediatric solid organ recipients

Arterial hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease after solid organ transplantation, emphasizing the need for blood pressure (BP) monitoring. The authors studied 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) parameters (index, load, dipping) and their predictive value with regard to hypertension as well as correlations with graft function and metabolic parameters such as obesity and dyslipidemias. The ABPM profiles of 111 renal, 29 heart, and 13 liver transplant recipients were retrospectively analyzed 5 to 10 years after transplant (median 5.1 years). The BP profiles among the different transplant groups were similar. The BP index and load were abnormal especially at nighttime and the nocturnal BP dipping was often blunted (in 49% to 83% of the patients). The BP variables were found to be equally valued when assessing hypertension. BP load of 50% instead of 25% seems to be a more adequate cutoff value. The BP variables correlated poorly with the metabolic parameters and kidney function. Antihypertensive medication did not notably change the ABPM profile in renal transplant recipients. Hypertension, including nocturnal hypertension, is present in children receiving solid organ transplant, underlining the importance of use of ABPM in the follow-up of these patients.

Patient experiences with self-monitoring renal function after renal transplantation: results from a single-center prospective pilot study

BACKGROUND

After a kidney transplantation, patients have to visit the hospital often to monitor for early signs of graft rejection. Self-monitoring of creatinine in addition to blood pressure at home could alleviate the burden of frequent outpatient visits, but only if patients are willing to self-monitor and if they adhere to the self-monitoring measurement regimen. A prospective pilot study was conducted to assess patients' experiences and satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For 3 months after transplantation, 30 patients registered self-measured creatinine and blood pressure values in an online record to which their physician had access to. Patients completed a questionnaire at baseline and follow-up to assess satisfaction, attitude, self-efficacy regarding self-monitoring, worries, and physician support. Adherence was studied by comparing the number of registered with the number of requested measurements.

RESULTS

Patients were highly motivated to self-monitor kidney function, and reported high levels of general satisfaction. Level of satisfaction was positively related to perceived support from physicians (P<0.01), level of self-efficacy (P<0.01), and amount of trust in the accuracy of the creatinine meter (P<0.01). The use of both the creatinine and blood pressure meter was considered pleasant and useful, despite the level of trust in the accuracy of the creatinine device being relatively low. Trust in the accuracy of the creatinine device appeared to be related to level of variation in subsequent measurement results, with more variation being related to lower levels of trust. Protocol adherence was generally very high, although the range of adherence levels was large and increased over time.

CONCLUSION

Patients' high levels of satisfaction suggest that at-home monitoring of creatinine and blood pressure after transplantation offers a promising strategy. Important prerequisites for safe implementation in transplant care seem to be support from physicians and patients' confidence in both their own self-monitoring skills and the accuracy of the devices used.

Association of pre-transplant blood pressure with post-transplant outcomes

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have indicated U-shaped associations between blood pressure (BP) and mortality in dialysis patients. We hypothesized that a similar association exists between pre-transplant BP and post-transplant outcomes in dialysis patients who undergo successful kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients were linked to the five-yr cohort of a large dialysis organization in the United States. We identified all dialysis patients who received a kidney transplant during this period. Unadjusted and multivariate adjusted predictors of transplant outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 13 881 patients included in our study were 47 ± 14 yr old and included 42% women. There was no association between pre-transplant systolic BP and post-transplant mortality, although a decreased risk trend was observed in those with low post-dialysis systolic BP. Compared to patients with pre-dialysis diastolic BP 70 to <80 mmHg, patients with pre-dialysis diastolic BP <50 mmHg experienced lower risk of post-transplant death (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55-0.99). However, compared to patients with post-dialysis diastolic BP 70 to <80 mmHg, patients with post-dialysis diastolic BP ≥100 mmHg experienced higher risk of death (HR: 3.50, 95% CI: 1.57-7.84). In addition, very low (<50 mmHg for diastolic BP and <110 mmHg for systolic BP) pre-transplant BP was associated with lower risk of graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Low post-dialysis systolic BP and low pre-dialysis diastolic BP are associated with lower post-transplant risk of death, whereas very high post-dialysis diastolic BP is associated with higher mortality in kidney transplant recipients. BP variations in dialysis patients prior to kidney transplantation may have a bearing on post-transplant outcome, which warrants additional studies.

Influence of renal function on long-term graft survival and patient survival in renal transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES

Renal function post kidney transplantation is an outcome of interest for both clinicians and regulators evaluating immunosuppressive treatments post-transplantation. The current review sought to provide a synopsis of currently available literature examining the relationship between post-transplantation renal function and long-term graft survival and patient survival.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. The search strategy was designed based on high level Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and designed to capture studies published in English to 2012 and identified a total of 2683 unique hits; for inclusion studies were required to have >100 patients. Following two rounds of screening, a total of 27 studies were included in the final review (26 of which were identified via the literature review and one study was identified via searches of the reference sections of included studies).

RESULTS

The consensus among studies was that lower post-transplantation GFR, in particular 12 month GFR, was consistently and significantly associated with an increased risk for overall graft loss, death-censored graft loss and all-cause mortality in both univariate and multivariate analyses. The magnitude of the association between reduced GFR and outcomes was greater for death-censored graft loss versus overall graft loss and for graft loss in comparison with overall patient mortality. The predictive utility of GFR alone in predicting long-term outcomes was reported to be limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower GFR and greater rates of decline in GFR post-transplantation are associated with an increased risk for graft loss (overall and death-censored) and all-cause mortality; however, the predictive utility of GFR alone in predicting long-term outcomes is limited.

Clinical characteristics of resistant hypertension in renal transplant patients

Hypertension is a prevalent complication that occurs in 80-85% of all kidney transplant recipients. The pathogenesis of post-transplant hypertension is multifactorial and includes pre-transplant hypertension, donor hypertension, renin secretion from the native kidney, graft dysfunction, recurrent disease and immunosuppressive treatment. Hypertension negatively affects transplant and patient survival outcomes; cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic renal disease and after successful renal transplantation. Hypertension is a well-known risk factor for CVD and it is frequently associated with other CVD risk factors. Despite increased awareness of the adverse effects of hypertension in both graft and patient survival, long-term studies have shown that arterial hypertension in the transplant population has not been adequately controlled. Resistant hypertension (RH) is defined as office blood pressure (oBP) that remains above goal (oBP ≥ 140/90 or 130/80 mmHg) in patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease despite the concurrent use of three antihypertensive agents, at full doses, one of them being a diuretic. Despite studies in the general population and the high prevalence of hypertension in renal transplant patients, data about RH are very scarce and the prevalence of RH in renal transplant patients is unknown and could be associated with a worse prognosis.

Home and office blood pressure monitoring in renal transplant recipients

Background. Arterial hypertension in renal transplant recipients (RTR) is associated with increased morbid mortality. In the general population, home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) was found to be superior to office blood pressure (OBP) in identifying true hypertensive patients. The aim of this study was to investigate HBPM for the assessment of blood pressure profile in RTR. Methodology and Principal Findings. We included prospectively 87 stable RTR. Sitting OBP was measured during the outpatient clinic. HBPM was performed by measuring BP every morning and night for 4 days. The accepted limits for the OBP and HBPM, were respectively, 140/90 mmHg and 135/85 mmHg. Patients were classified as “normotensive,” “uncontrolled,” “white-coat hypertensive” and “masked hypertensive”, (OBP below the limit and HBPM above). During the study, 81 patients (55 males, age 48.5 ± 14 years) were available for analysis. The mean OBP and HBP were 138/83 ± 14/10 mmHg and 133/79 ± 14/8 mmHg; 29% of patients were uncontrolled, 28% normotensive, 21% white coat, and 21% masked hypertensive. Age, glycemia, and number of antihypertensive drugs were associated with hypertension. Conclusion and Significance. In RTR, HBPM is well accepted and better define BP profile since there is 42% discrepancy between OBPM and HBPM. Whether this discrepancy is associated with worst outcome in the long term remains to be demonstrated.

Influence of donor age on renal graft function in first seven post transplant days

Increasing gap between demand and availability of human kidneys for transplantation has forced a re-evaluation of the limits on donor age acceptability. The present study included 74 patients who underwent kidney transplantation in University Clinical Centre Tuzla. In an observational cohort study we assessed impact of donor age on post transplant renal function by analyzing following parameters: 24 hour urine output, creatinine clearance (Cr Cl) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Depending on donor age recipients were allocated in to two groups. Group I included patients who received renal graft from donors age up to 55 years, and Group II encountered recipients who received renal graft from donors older than 55 years. Our goal was to determine whether donor age over 55 years significantly diminishes renal graft function in first seven post transplant days. No statistically significant difference was found between Group I and II regarding 24 hour urine output. From second to fifth postoperative day creatinine clearance values were higher in the group of patients who received kidney from donors older than 55 years (47+/-19, 1 vs. 44, 4+/-20, 8). On the fifth, sixth and seventh post operative day GFR was significantly higher in patients who received renal graft from donors age up to 55 years (p<0, 0161). Our data showed no significant difference in observed variables between the two groups, thus indicating that utilization of renal grafts from donors' age > 55 years is acceptable and may considerably expand the donor pool.

Association of arterial hypertension with renal target organ damage in kidney transplant recipients: the predictive role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

BACKGROUND

Although arterial hypertension is a powerful predictor of graft failure, only few studies have evaluated 24-hr blood pressure (BP) profile in renal transplant recipients (RTRs).

METHODS

We performed ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in 94 RTRs (65 men; age 28-71 years) with 1-year functioning grafts. Serum biochemical parameters, daily proteinuria, and transplantation-related data were evaluated in all subjects.

RESULTS

ABPM showed that only 5% of RTRs were normotensives (BP<130/80 mm Hg) and identified 29% of patients with nocturnal hypertension. A strong, direct correlation was shown between each set of both systolic BP and diastolic BP measured by ABPM and serum creatinine, daily proteinuria, and serum triglycerides (P at least <0.025 for each). Serum creatinine immediately after transplantation and 1-yr asleep diastolic BP were the only significant predictors of 1-yr creatinine (P<0.0001; r=0.49), whereas awake systolic BP was the only predictor of daily proteinuria (r=0.39; P=0.005) by multiple regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

BP assessed by ABPM proved to be a stronger predictor of renal graft damage than traditional immunologic factors. ABPM improved the diagnostic accuracy of arterial hypertension in RTRs and was the only effective tool in disclosing the association of BP with 1-year renal transplant outcome.

Hypertension after renal transplantation

Hypertension is a common and serious complication after renal transplantation. It is an important risk factor for graft loss and morbidity and mortality of transplanted children. The etiology of posttransplant hypertension is multifactorial: native kidneys, immunosuppressive therapy, renal-graft artery stenosis, and chronic allograft nephropathy are the most common causes. Blood pressure (BP) in transplanted children should be measured not only by casual BP (CBP) measurement but also regularly by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). The prevalence of posttransplant hypertension ranges between 60% and 90% depending on the method of BP measurement and definition. Left ventricular hypertrophy is a frequent type of end-organ damage in hypertensive children after transplantation (50-80%). All classes of antihypertensive drugs can be used in the treatment of posttransplant hypertension. Hypertension control in transplanted children is poor; only 20-50% of treated children reach normal BP. The reason for this poor control seems to be inadequate antihypertensive therapy, which can be improved by increasing the number of antihypertensive drugs. Improved hypertension control leads to improved long-term graft and patient survival in adults. In children, there is a great potential for antihypertensive treatment that could also result in improved graft and patient survival.

Posttransplant diabetes and hypertension: pathophysiologic insights and therapeutic rationale

New-onset diabetes after transplantation and hypertension are very common after renal transplantation and are associated with adverse graft and cardiovascular outcomes. A thorough understanding of the unique factors that operate in renal transplant recipients is essential for the proper evaluation and management of these important disorders. This review outlines the pathogenesis, diagnostic workup, and therapeutic rationale for diabetes and hypertension after transplantation.

Hypertension After Renal Transplant

Hypertension is common after renal transplant and is associated with adverse graft and patient outcomes. A thorough understanding of the unique factors that operate in renal transplant recipients is essential for the proper evaluation and management of this disorder. In this review, the authors outline the pathogenesis, diagnostic workup, and treatment of hypertension after renal transplant.

Five years of steroid sparing in renal transplantation with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil

Steroid sparing with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is associated with good short-term renal transplant outcomes. However, late allograft dysfunction and failure remain concerns. In this study, 101 consecutive patients underwent renal transplantation with tacrolimus, MMF, and 7 days of corticosteroids only. After a median follow-up of 51 months (range 36-62), overall patient survival is 97%, and overall survival with graft function is 91%. The acute rejection rate at 12 months was 19%. Late rejection was uncommon, with only three further episodes beyond 12 months. Graft function was stable during the study, with a mean creatinine of 140 micromol/L and mean estimated creatinine clearance of 57 ml/min at the end of follow-up. Six patients developed posttransplant diabetes mellitus (three cases beyond 12 months). This steroid avoidance regimen is associated with excellent medium-term patient and graft outcomes, and a low incidence of side effects.

Steroid Sparing in Renal Transplantation With Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil: Three-Year Results

Although renal transplantation with a 7-day steroid-sparing regimen, tacrolimus and mycophenolate, is associated with good short-term outcomes, late allograft dysfunction and failure remain concerns. In this study 101 consecutive patients underwent renal transplantation using this immunosuppressive regimen. In addition, anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody was used in 25 high-risk patients (regrafts, two-antigen human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR mismatch or sensitized with anti-HLA panel reactivity >30%). After a median follow-up of 39 months (range 29 to 49), overall patient survival is 98%, with two cardiac deaths. Three other graft losses occurred, one each to early venous thrombosis, polyoma viral nephropathy, and late rejection due to noncompliance. Therefore, overall graft survival is 95%. The acute rejection rate at 6 and 12 months was 19% (no rejection occurred between months 6 and 12). Late rejection was uncommon, with only two further episodes beyond 12 months. Mean creatinine at 12 months was 144 micromol/L and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 55 mL/min. Graft function was stable at 3 years with a mean creatinine of 142 micromol/L and mean estimated GFR 56 mL/min. During the study, five patients developed posttransplant diabetes mellitus (two cases beyond 12 months). Tissue-invasive cytomegalovirus disease and BK viral nephropathy each occurred in three patients, with all episodes in the first 12 months. Mean weight gain is 3.3 kg and mean blood pressure is 135/81 on an average of 1.5 antihypertensive agents. This steroid-avoidance regimen is associated with excellent medium-term patient and graft outcomes and a low incidence of side effects.

Association between pulse pressure and cardiovascular disease in renal transplant patients

Elevated pulse pressure in general population has been shown to be associated with cardiovascular disease, which is the main cause of death in renal transplant patients. We investigated the effect that a wider pulse pressure range may have on cardiovascular disease after renal transplantation in 532 transplant patients with functioning graft for more than 1 year. Patients were classified into two groups depending on 1-year pulse pressure (< or >/=65 mmHg) and we analyzed patient and graft survival, post-transplant cardiovascular disease and main causes of death. Higher pulse pressure was associated with older recipient age (40.8 +/- 10.8 vs. 50 +/- 11.3), higher systolic blood pressure (132.7 +/- 16.1 vs. 164.5 +/- 16), lower blood diastolic pressure (84.5 +/- 11.6 vs. 84.4 +/- 11.2), higher prevalence of diabetes (12% vs. 23%) and total cardiovascular disease (20.9% vs. 33.6%). Five- and 10-year patient survivals were lower in the group with higher pulse pressure, being vascular disease the main cause of death in both groups. In a Cox regression model increased pulse pressure was associated with higher cardiovascular disease (RR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.13-2.32 p < 0.01). In conclusion, pulse pressure was an independent risk factor for increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in renal transplant patients.

Factors Predicting Long-term Graft Survival after Kidney Transplantation: Multicenter Study in Japan

A multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 936 living donor kidney transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (FK) from April 1982. The influences of acute rejection, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension were estimated by Kaplan-Meier's analysis and Wilcoxon's analysis. Of 916 recipients, 532 (58.1%) had acute rejections. The 5- and 10-year graft survival rates in the recipients with acute rejection were 75.2% and 55.2%, respectively. The corresponding rates of the recipients without acute rejection were 80.2% and 70.6%, respectively. The graft survival rate was worse in recipients with late-phase rejection and multiple rejection episodes (p < 0.00006). Of 451 recipients, 176 (39.0%) had hypercholesterolemia 3 years after kidney transplantation. The 5- and 10-year graft survival rates in the recipients with hypercholesterolemia were 88.7% and 68.7%, respectively. Those of the recipients without hypercholesterolemia were 95.2% and 83.9%, respectively. The graft survival rate in the recipients with hypercholesterolemia was lower than that in the recipients without hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.003). Of 323 recipients, 123 (38.1%) had hypertriglyceridemia 3 years after kidney transplantation. The 5- and 10-year graft survival rates in the recipients with hypertriglyceridemia were 93.7% and 80.5%, respectively. Those in the recipients without hypertriglyceridemia were 95.1% and 86.5%, respectively. The graft survival rate in the recipients with hypertriglyceridemia was lower than that in the recipients without hypertriglyceridemia (p = 0.371). Of 367 recipients, 151 (41.1%) had systolic hypertension 3 years after kidney transplantation. The 5- and 10-year graft survival rates in the recipients with hypertension were 85.6% and 64.7%, respectively. Those of the recipients without hypertension were 95.6% and 83.8%, respectively. The graft survival rate in the recipients with hypertension was lower than that in the recipients without hypertension (p < 0.001). Acute rejection, hyperlipidemia (hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia), and hypertension are predictive factors for long-term graft survival. Especially the onset time, number of rejections, and efficacy of treatment for acute rejection would have a significant influence on long-term graft survival.

Steroid sparing with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation

Evidence suggests that steroid sparing in renal transplantation is associated with good outcomes, although there are limited data regarding steroid sparing in Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)-based regimes. In this study we describe the use of these agents in 101 consecutive patients undergoing renal transplantation using only a 7-day course of prednisolone. Median follow-up was 33 months (range 18-44). Patient and graft survival at 1 year were 100% and 98%, respectively. The acute rejection rate at both 6 and 12 months was 19%, with two episodes beyond 12 months. Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (anti-CD25 mAb) was administered to 25 patients at high immunological risk: a trend toward a lower rejection rate was seen in these patients compared with those at lower risk but not receiving induction therapy (8% vs. 22%; p = 0.11). Two patients experienced recurrent rejection. Of the twenty-three rejection episodes in total, 26% showed vascular involvement. Allograft function was preserved at 12 months with a mean creatinine of 144 micromol/L and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 55 mL/min. At 12 months, the incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus was 3.5%. This steroid-sparing regime is associated with excellent patient and graft outcomes, and a low incidence of side effects.