Anticoagulation Management In Hemodialysis Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Evidence And Opinion

Anticoagulation for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Dialysis: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Key Points

Background

Atrial fibrillation is common in individuals receiving dialysis. The role of oral anticoagulation in this population is uncertain given its exclusion from previous seminal clinical trials. Our objective was to determine the feasibility of performing a large definitive trial to establish the optimal anticoagulation strategy in individuals with atrial fibrillation receiving dialysis.

Methods

The Strategies for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Receiving Dialysis trial was a parallel-group, open-label, allocation-concealed, pilot randomized control trial that took place at 28 centers in Canada and Australia. The trial included adults (18 years or older) undergoing dialysis with a history of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who met the CHADS-65 criteria. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to receive dose-adjusted warfarin, apixaban 5 mg twice daily, or no oral anticoagulation and followed for 26 weeks. The primary outcomes evaluated the following measures of feasibility: (1) recruitment of the target population within 2 years from the start of the trial and (2) adherence of >80% of randomized patients to the allocated treatment strategy at the conclusion of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included stroke and bleeding.

Results

From December 2019 to June 2022, 151 patients were enrolled and randomized to apixaban (n=51), warfarin (n=52), or no oral anticoagulation (n=48). Allowing for pauses related to the coronavirus disease pandemic, recruitment was completed in 30 months, and 123 (83%) of participants completed follow-up in their allocated treatment arm. There was one adjudicated stroke event. Eight participants had a major bleeding event (four warfarin, two apixaban, two no oral anticoagulation). Death occurred in 15 participants (nine warfarin, two apixaban, four no oral anticoagulation). Time in the therapeutic range for warfarin recipients was 58% (interquartile range, 47%–70%).

Conclusions

We have demonstrated the feasibility of recruitment and adherence in a trial that compared different anticoagulation strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving dialysis.

Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:

Strategies for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Receiving Dialysis (SAFE-D), NCT03987711.

Use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients on chronic hemodialysis: Contemporary appraisal on the role for patients with atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing hemodialysis and in this patient population, management in terms of oral anticoagulation (OAC) presents unique challenges due to the increased risk of both thromboembolic events and bleeding complications. The attributable risk of AF for stroke may differ from patients without CKD, raising the question if OAC is indicated at all. Historically, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been the standard treatment for anticoagulation in AF; however, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as an alternative therapeutic option, whereby data from prospective randomised trials with hemodialysis patients is limited resulting in great variability of practice and guideline recommendations. This review summarizes existing data sources regarding the use and benefit of oral anticoagulation with VKA and DOAC in hemodialysis patients.

Ten tips to manage oral anticoagulation in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a high incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF). While general treatment strategies for AF may largely be transferred to patients with mild to moderate CKD, patients with advanced CKD-particularly hemodialysis (HD) patients-with AF pose substantial therapeutical challenges to cardiologists and nephrologists. The arguably greatest dilemma is the very limited evidence on appropriate strategies for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in HD patients with AF, since the risk for both thromboembolic events without oral anticoagulation and severe bleeding events with oral anticoagulation are substantially increased in advanced CKD, compared with the general population. Thus, the benefit to risk ratio of either vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants is less evident in HD than in non-CKD patients with AF. As a multidisciplinary panel of clinicians, we here propose 10 tips that may help our colleagues to navigate between the risk of undertreatment-exposing CKD patients with AF to a high stroke risk-and overtreatment-exposing the very same patients to a prohibitively high bleeding risk. These tips include ideas on alternative risk stratification strategies and novel treatment approaches that are currently in clinical studies-such as factor XI inhibitors or left atrial appendage closure-and may become game-changers for HD patients with AF.

Anticoagulation in Chronic Kidney Disease

The nuanced landscape of anticoagulation therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) presents a formidable challenge, intricately balancing the dual hazards of hemorrhage and thrombosis. These patients find themselves in a precarious position, teetering on the edge of these risks due to compromised platelet functionality and systemic disturbances within their coagulation frameworks. The management of such patients necessitates a meticulous approach to dosing adjustments and vigilant monitoring to navigate the perilous waters of anticoagulant therapy. This is especially critical considering the altered pharmacokinetics in CKD, where the clearance of drugs is significantly impeded, heightening the risk of accumulation and adverse effects. In the evolving narrative of anticoagulation therapy, the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has heralded a new era, offering a glimmer of hope for those navigating the complexities of CKD. These agents, with their promise of easier management and a reduced need for monitoring, have begun to reshape the contours of care, particularly for patients not yet on dialysis. However, this is not without its caveats. The application of DOACs in the context of advanced CKD remains a largely uncharted territory, necessitating a cautious exploration to unearth their true potential and limitations. Moreover, the advent of innovative strategies such as left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) underscores the dynamic nature of anticoagulation therapy, potentially offering a tailored solution for those at the intersection of CKD and elevated stroke risk. Yet the journey toward integrating such advancements into standard practice is laden with unanswered questions, demanding rigorous investigation to illuminate their efficacy and safety across the spectrum of kidney disease. In summary, the management of anticoagulation in CKD is a delicate dance, requiring a harmonious blend of precision, caution, and innovation. As we venture further into this complex domain, we must build upon our current understanding, embracing both emerging therapies and the need for ongoing research. Only then can we hope to offer our patients a path that navigates the narrow strait between bleeding and clotting, toward safer and more effective care.

Treatment strategies of the thromboembolic risk in kidney failure patients with atrial fibrillation

The incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients affected by kidney failure, i.e. glomerular filtration rate <15 ml/min/1.73 m2, is high and probably underestimated. Numerous uncertainties remain regarding how to prevent thromboembolic events in this population because both cardiology and nephrology guidelines do not provide clear recommendations. The efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) in preventing thromboembolism in patients with kidney failure and AF has not been demonstrated for either vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or direct anticoagulants (DOACs). Moreover, it remains unclear which is more effective and safer, because estimated creatinine clearance <25-30 ml/min was an exclusion criterion in the randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Three RCTs comparing DOACs and VKAs in kidney failure failed to reach the primary endpoint, as they were underpowered. The left atrial appendage is the main source of thromboembolism in the presence of AF. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has recently been proposed as an alternative to OAC. RCTs comparing the efficacy and safety of LAAC versus OAC in kidney failure were terminated prematurely due to recruitment failure. A recent prospective study showed a reduction in thromboembolic events in haemodialysis patients with AF and undergoing LAAC compared with patients taking or not taking OAC. We review current treatment standards and discuss recent developments in managing the thromboembolic risk in kidney failure patients with AF. The importance of shared decision-making with the multidisciplinary team and the patient to consider individual risks and benefits of each treatment option is underlined.

Comparison of warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran for effectiveness and safety in atrial fibrillation patients with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This retrospective cohort study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores in northern China.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate anticoagulation in AF patients at the second affiliated hospital of Harbin Medical University from September 2018 to August 2019. Patients included in this study (n = 806) received warfarin (n = 300), or rivaroxaban (n = 203), or dabigatran (n = 303). Baseline characteristics and follow-up data including adherence, bleeding events and ischemic stroke (IS) events were collected.

RESULTS

Patients receiving rivaroxaban (73.9%) or dabigatran (73.6%) showed better adherence than those receiving warfarin (56.7%). Compared with warfarin-treated patients, dabigatran-treated patients had lower incidence of bleeding events (10.9% vs 19.3%, χ2 = 8.385, P = 0.004) and rivaroxaban-treated patients had lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (7.4% vs 13.7%, χ2 = 4.822, P = 0.028). We classified patients into three groups based on CHA2DS2-VASc score (0-1, 2-3, ≥ 4). In dabigatran intervention, incidence of bleeding events was higher in patients with score 0-1 (20.0%) than those with score 2-3 (7.9%, χ2 = 5.772, P = 0.016) or score ≥ 4 (8.6%, χ2 = 4.682, P = 0.030). Patients with score 0-1 in warfarin or rivaroxaban therapy had a similar but not significant increase of bleeding compared with patients with score 2-3 or score ≥ 4, respectively. During the follow-up, 33 of 806 patients experienced IS and more than half (19, 57.6%) were patients with score ≥ 4. Comparing patients with score 0-1 and 2-3, the latter had an significant reduction of IS in patients prescribed warfarin and non-significant reduction in rivaroxaban and dabigatran therapy.

CONCLUSION

Compared with warfarin therapy, patients with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores receiving either rivaroxaban or dabigatran were associated with higher persistence. AF patients with score ≥ 4 were more likely to experience IS events while hemorrhagic tendency preferred patients with low score 0-1.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation on chronic hemodialysis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease on chronic hemodialysis are at risk for thromboembolic and bleeding events. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this population.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with VKAs in patients with AF on chronic hemodialysis from inception to February 2023 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Outcomes were reported using risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.2.2.

RESULTS

We selected three RCTs including 341 patients, of whom 176 (51.6%) were randomized to DOACs. Follow-up ranged from 174 days to 3.38 years. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.34; 95% CI 0.69-2.60; p = 0.39), all-cause mortality (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.72-1.27; p = 0.77), ischemic/uncertain type of stroke or transient ischemic attack (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.19-1.35; p = 0.17), or major or life-threatening bleeding (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.39-1.25; p = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis of three RCTs, no significant difference was observed between DOACs and VKAs in cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, ischemic/uncertain type of stroke or transient ischemic attack, or major or life-threatening bleeding in patients with AF on chronic hemodialysis.

Cardiac Devices and Kidney Disease

A growing variety of cardiac devices are available to monitor or support cardiovascular function. The entwined nature of cardiovascular disease and kidney disease makes the relationship of these devices with kidney disease a multifaceted question relating to the use of these devices in individuals with kidney disease and to the effects of the devices and device placement on kidney health. Cardiac devices can be categorized broadly into cardiac implantable electronic devices, structural devices, and circulatory assist devices. Cardiac implantable electronic devices include devices for monitoring and managing cardiac electrical activity and devices for monitoring hemodynamics. Structural devices modify cardiac structure and include valve prostheses, valve repair clips, devices for treating atrial septal abnormalities, left atrial appendage closure devices, and interatrial shunt devices. Circulatory assist devices support the failing heart or support cardiac function during high-risk cardiac procedures. Evidence for the use of these devices in individuals with kidney disease, effects of the devices on kidney health and function, specific considerations with devices in kidney disease, and important knowledge gaps are surveyed in this article. With the growing prevalence of combined cardiorenal disease and the increasing variety of cardiac devices, kidney disease considerations are an important aspect of device therapy.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

Factor Xa Inhibitors Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease on Dialysis: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is prevalent among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis, and both conditions are associated with a heightened risk of cardiovascular diseases. Anticoagulation is essential for preventing thromboembolic complications in these patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of factor Xa inhibitors compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for AF patients on dialysis.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published up to June 2024. Eligible studies compared factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) with VKAs in AF patients on dialysis, with primary outcomes of stroke or systemic embolism(SSE) and major bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 7 studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 4 observational cohorts) were included. For the RCTs, the use of factor Xa inhibitors was associated with a reduced risk of SSE compared to VKAs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.15-0.93). There was no significant difference in the risk of major bleeding events between the two groups (OR = 0.65, 95%CI:0.32-1.33). Observational cohort studies yielded similar results with a decreased risk of SSE (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74, 95%CI:0.57-0.96) and no significant difference in major bleeding (HR = 0.87, 95%CI:0.62-1.22). No differences in treatment effect between apixaban and rivaroxaban were observed for efficacy (p-interaction = 0.44) and safety (p-interaction = 0.21) outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Factor Xa inhibitors, particularly apixaban and rivaroxaban, were associated with a lower risk of SEE without an increase in major bleeding, which might be convenient alternatives to VKAs in managing AF in patients with ESKD on dialysis.

Bleeding Risk in Hemodialysis Patients

Cardiovascular diseases are highly prevalent among patients on dialysis. For these diseases, antiplatelets and antithrombotic therapies including heparin, vitamin K antagonists, and direct oral anticoagulants, are being used. However, the benefit-risk balance of these therapies could differ for dialysis patients compared with the general population. This review article focuses on the bleeding risk associated with the use of heparin, antiplatelets, vitamin K antagonists, and direct oral anticoagulants in patients receiving hemodialysis.

[Cardiovascular treatment in chronic kidney disease]

Patients with combined cardiac and renal diseases are particularly challenging in the routine clinical practice due to the substantial risk profile for increased morbidity and mortality. As cardiorenal patients have often been underrepresented in randomized, controlled interventional trials, guideline recommendations regarding the choice of treatment are often weaker for these individuals than for cardiovascular patients without chronic kidney disease. Furthermore, there are limitations in the approval of certain medications depending on the kidney function. This review addresses some considerations in crucial treatment areas for patients with cardiovascular diseases, whose treatment is significantly influenced by concomitant chronic kidney disease.

Atrial Fibrillation in Kidney Failure: Challenges in Risk Assessment and Anticoagulation Management

Management of atrial fibrillation (AF) is a clinical conundrum in people with kidney failure. Stroke risk is disproportionately high, but clinicians have a limited armamentarium to improve outcomes in this population in whom there is a concurrently high bleeding risk. Direct oral anticoagulants may have a superior benefit-risk profile compared with vitamin K antagonists in people on hemodialysis. Although research has predominantly focused on identifying a safe and effective oral anticoagulation option to reduce stroke risk in people with kidney failure (and predominantly those on hemodialysis), it remains uncertain how clinicians discriminate between people who would derive net clinical benefit as opposed to net harm. The recommended CHA2DS2-VASc score cutoffs provide poor discriminatory value, and there is an urgent need to identify robust markers of thromboembolic risk in kidney failure. There is increasing data to challenge the prior dogma of risk equivalence across AF type, and the American Heart Association highlights moving beyond AF as a binary entity to consider the prognostic significance of AF burden. Implantable cardiac monitor studies reveal high rates and varied burden of subclinical and paroxysmal AF in people on hemodialysis. The association between AF burden and the proarrhythmic environment of hemodialysis with cyclical volume loading, offloading, and electrolyte changes is not well studied. We review the significance of AF burden as a contributor to thromboembolic risk, its potential as the missing link in risk assessment, and updated evidence for anticoagulation in people with kidney failure.

Quantitative determination of plasma free and total concentrations of antivitamin K drugs using a new sensitive and rapid LC-MS/MS method: Application in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are the first-line anticoagulants used in end stage renal disease. This population experiences a significant variability in their International Normalized Ratio (INR) over time. There is a need for methods allowing the study of the pharmacokinetics of free and total concentrations of VKAs to explain INR variability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We developed and validated a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method allowing the quantification of warfarin and fluindione free and total plasma concentrations. Chromatographic separation was achieved in a raptor biphenyl column and the spectrometry acquisition was set in multiple reaction monitoring mode after negative electrospray ionization. We then applied it in describing the plasma free and total concentrations of VKAs in samples from 50 hemodialysis patients.

RESULTS

The developed method is rapid, sensitive and specific. Our cohort results showed a correlation between free and total VKA concentrations. The free VKA concentrations tended to be higher in patients with higher INR. Although VKAs are highly albumin-bound drugs, albumin concentration did not totally explain the high inter-individual total VKA concentrations variability.

CONCLUSION

This opens the door to further studies to understand the factors involved in their variability.

Phenotype-directed clinically driven low-dose direct oral anticoagulant for atrial fibrillation

Clinically-driven dose reduction of direct oral anticoagulants in individuals with atrial fibrillation is prevalent worldwide. However, a paucity of evidence to tailor dose selection remained as clinical unmet need. Current doses of anticoagulant were determined largely by landmark clinical trials, in which the enrolled subjects were carefully selected and without major comorbidities. Our study reviewed the relevant real-world studies in specific patient phenotypes, including renal and hepatic diseases, elderly, low body weight, Asians and presence of concomitant drug-drug interactions. Thorough investigations toward the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in reduced doses will facilitate substituting current universal approach with individualized prescriptions.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Hemodialysis Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients who have both atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis remains controversial, with warfarin remaining the mainstay of the treatment. As hemodialysis patients were excluded from most clinical DOACs trials, the evidence of their efficacy and safety is lacking in this cohort of patients.

Aim

To review the current evidence investigating safety profile and the efficacy of DOACs in comparison with warfarin in patients with AF and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis.

Methods and Results

We included five studies with a total of 34,516 patients in our meta-analysis. The outcomes were major bleeding, ischemic stroke, systemic embolization, hemorrhagic stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, minor bleeding, and death. Of these patients, 31,472 (92.14%) received warfarin and 3,044 patients received DOACs (8.91%). No significant differences in the incidence of hemorrhagic stroke, major bleeding, hemodialysis access site bleeding, ischemic stroke, and GI bleeding were found between DOACs and warfarin. However, there were higher rates of systemic embolization, minor bleeding, and death events in patients who received DOACs than in the warfarin group (3.39% vs. 1.97%, P-value = 0.02), (6.78% vs. 2.2%, P-value 0.02), and (11.38% vs. 5.12%, P-value < 0.006) respectively.

Conclusion

In patients on dialysis who require anticoagulation for AF, warfarin could be associated with a significant reduction in minor bleeding, systemic embolization, and death compared to DOACs. These findings need to be validated by further prospective studies to address the best strategy to deal with the increased thrombotic and bleeding risks in such patients.

Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation in CKD: Role of Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants. A Narrative Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in chronic kidney disease (CKD), with a close bidirectional relationship between the two entities. The presence of CKD in AF increases the risk of thromboembolic events, mortality and bleeding. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been the mainstay of treatment for the prevention of thromboembolic events in AF until recently, with confirmed benefits in AF patients with stage 3 CKD. However, the risk-benefit profile of VKA in patients with AF and stages 4-5 CKD is controversial due to the lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials. Treatment with VKA in CKD patients has been associated with conditions such as poorer anticoagulation quality, increased risk of bleeding, faster progression of vascular/valvular calcification and higher risk of calciphylaxis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown equal or greater efficacy in stroke/systemic embolism prevention, and a better safety profile than VKA in post-hoc analysis of the pivotal randomized controlled trials in patients with non-valvular AF and stage 3 CKD, yet evidence of its risk-benefit profile in more advanced stages of CKD is scarce. Observational studies associate DOACs with a good safety/effectiveness profile compared to VKA in non-dialysis CKD patients. Further, DOACs have been associated with a lower risk of acute kidney injury and CKD development/progression than VKA. This narrative review summarizes the evidence of the efficacy and safety of warfarin and DOACs in patients with AF at different CKD stages, as well as their effects on renal function, vascular/valvular calcification and bone health.