Association of Blood Pressure with Cardiovascular Outcome and Mortality: Results from the KNOW-CKD Study

Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Its Association with Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Moderate to Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease

INTRODUCTION

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has emerged as a potential indicator for cardio-metabolic risk. However, clinical implications of NAFLD in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are still elusive. We investigated to explore the association between NAFLD and adverse clinical outcomes among patients with CKD.

METHODS

In this national population-based retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 816,857 individuals who underwent National Health Insurance Service health examinations and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 15-59 mL/min/1.73 m2. The main predictor was the fatty liver index (FLI), a surrogate marker for NAFLD. The primary outcome was a composite cardiovascular or kidney events, which were examined combined or separately.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 7.7 (IQR, 6.4-9.6) years, the composite outcome events occurred in 74,266 (9.1%) individuals. Among these, there were 55,525 (6.8%) cardiovascular events and 22,961 (2.8%) kidney events, respectively. Compared to FLI of <30, the hazard ratio (HRs; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for the composite outcome were 1.16 (1.14-1.18) and 1.30 (1.26-1.33) for the FLIs of 30-59 and ≥60, respectively. The corresponding HRs for cardiovascular events were 1.21 (95% CI, 1.18-1.23) and 1.36 (95% CI, 1.31-1.40), respectively. Furthermore, FLIs of 30-59 and ≥60 were associated with an 11% (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.15) and 24% (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.17-1.30) increased risk of kidney events, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

NAFLD was associated with higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes in individuals with CKD. These findings suggest that NAFLD, as assessed by the FLI, can serve as a predictor of cardiovascular and kidney events in CKD population.

Systemic immune inflammation index and all-cause mortality in chronic kidney disease: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and all-cause mortality in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective cohort study was carried out among 9303 participants with CKD from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles spanning 1999 to 2018. The mortality data were ascertained by linking participant records to the National Death Index up to December 31, 2019. Complex sampling-weighted multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were employed to estimate the association between SII level and all-cause mortality, providing hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A restricted cubic spline analysis was conducted to explore potential nonlinear correlation. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were also conducted.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up period of 86 months, 3400 (36.54%) all-cause deaths were documented. A distinctive "J"-shaped relationship between SII level and all-cause mortality was discerned among individuals with CKD, with the nadir observed at an SII level of 478.93 within the second quartile. After adjusting for potential covariates, the risk of all-cause mortality escalated by 13% per increment of one standard deviation of SII, once SII exceeded 478.93 (HR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.08-1.18). An elevated SII was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality among patients with CKD (Q4 vs. Q2: HR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.01-1.48). Subgroup analyses indicated that the correlation between SII and CKD mortality was particularly pronounced among participants over 60 years old and individuals with diabetes. Sensitivity analyses revealed a linear positive association between SII and all-cause mortality after removing the extreme 5% outliers of SII.

CONCLUSIONS

A distinctive "J"-shaped relationship between SII level and all-cause mortality was identified among individuals with CKD. Further research is warranted to validate and expand upon these findings.

Association of cardiovascular health metrics with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in chronic kidney disease: A cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Since the global burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is rising rapidly, the study aimed to assess the association of cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics with all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality among individuals with CKD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The cohort study included 5834 participants with CKD from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2018. A composite CVH score was calculated based on smoking status, physical activity, body mass index, blood pressure, total cholesterol, diet quality, and glucose control. Primary outcomes were all-cause and CVD mortality as of December 31, 2019. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between CVH metrics and deaths in CKD patients. During a median follow-up of 7.2 years, 2178 all-cause deaths and 779 CVD deaths were documented. Compared to participants with ideal CVH, individuals with intermediate CVH exhibited a 46.0% increase in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval: 1.17, 1.83), while those with poor CVH demonstrated a 101.0% increase (2.01; 1.54, 2.62). For CVD mortality, individuals with intermediate CVH experienced a 56.0% increase (1.56; 1.02, 2.39), and those with poor CVH demonstrated a 143.0% increase (2.43; 1.51, 3.91). Linear trends were noted for the associations of CVH with both all-cause mortality (P for trend <0.001) and CVD mortality (P for trend = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower CVH levels were associated with higher all-cause and CVD mortality in individuals with CKD, which highlights the importance of maintaining good CVH in CKD patients.

Blood pressure control in diabetic kidney disease: a post-hoc analysis of the FANTASTIC trial

BACKGROUND

The target blood pressure (BP) value is unclear for diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of strict BP control or 'on treatment' BP on clinical outcomes in patients with DKD.

METHODS

A post-hoc analysis of the prespecified secondary outcomes of the FimAsartaN proTeinuriA SusTaIned reduCtion in comparison with losartan in diabetic chronic kidney disease (FANTASTIC) trial, a randomized multicenter double-blind phase III trial. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 19 years with DKD. We assigned 341 participants with DKD to BP control strategy (standard-systolic BP [SBP] < 140 mmHg versus strict-SBP < 130 mmHg). The outcome was the occurrence of cardiovascular events and renal events. Separate analyses were performed to compared the risk of outcome according to achieved average BP levels.

RESULTS

A total of 341 participants were included in the analysis. Over a median follow-up of 2.8 years, cardiovascular/renal events were observed in 25 (7.3%) participants. Mean (SD) SBPs in the standard and strict BP control group were 140.2 (11.6) and 140.2 (11.9) mmHg, respectively. The strict BP control group did not show significantly reduced risk of cardiovascular/renal events (HR 1.32; 95% CI 0.60-2.92]). In the post-hoc analyses using achieved BP, achieved average SBP of 130-139 mmHg resulted in reduced risk of cardiovascular/renal events (HR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.67) compared to achieved average SBP ≥ 140 mmHg, whereas further reduction in achieved average SBP < 130 mmHg did not impart additional benefits.

CONCLUSION

In patients with DKD, targeting a SBP of less than 130 mmHg, as compared with less than 140 mmHg, did not reduce the rate of a composite of cardiovascular and renal events. Achieved SBP of 130-139 mmHg was associated with a decreased risk for the primary outcome in patients with DKD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTirals.gov Identifier: NCT02620306, registered December 3, 2015. ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02620306 ).

Findings from the KNOW-CKD Study indicate that higher systolic blood pressure time in target range is associated with a lower risk of chronic kidney disease progression

Time-in-target range (TTR) of systolic blood pressure (SBP) is determined by the proportion of time during which SBP remains within a defined optimal range. TTR has emerged as a useful metric for assessing SBP control over time. However, it is uncertain if SBP-TTR can predict the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Here, we investigated the association between SBP-TTR during the first year of enrollment and CKD progression among 1758 participants from the KNOW-CKD (KoreaN Cohort Study for Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease). Baseline median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 51.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Participants were categorized into four SBP-TTR groups (0%, 1-50%, 51-99%, and 100%). The primary outcome was CKD progression defined as 50% or more decline in eGFR from baseline measurement or the initiation of kidney replacement therapy. During the follow-up period (9212 person-years over a median 5.4 years), the composite outcome occurred in 710 participants. In the multivariate cause-specific hazard model, a one-standard deviation increase in SBP-TTR was associated with an 11% lower risk of the composite outcome with hazard ratio, 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.97). Additionally, compared to patients with SBP-TTR 0%, the respective hazard ratios for those with SBP-TTR 1-50%, 51-99%, and 100% were 0.85 (0.68-1.07), 0.76 (0.60-0.96), and 0.72 (0.55-0.94), and the respective corresponding slopes of eGFR decline were -3.17 (-3.66 to -2.69), -3.02 (-3.35 to -2.68), -2.62 (-2.89 to - 2.36), and -2.33 (-2.62 to -2.04) ml/min/1.73 m2. Thus, higher SBP-TTR was associated with a decreased risk of CKD progression in patients with CKD.

Relationship between the lower limit of systolic blood pressure target and kidney function decline in advanced chronic kidney disease: an instrumental variable analysis from the REACH-J CKD cohort study

Intensive antihypertensive treatment decreases cardiovascular disease and mortality risks in chronic kidney disease (CKD), whereas extremely low systolic blood pressure (SBP) is associated with worsening kidney function and poor prognosis. Although the SBP variation is particularly large in patients with CKD, the optimal lower limit of SBP target is unclear. In a nationwide, multicenter cohort study of patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, we evaluated the association between the eGFR slopes and the lower limit of SBP target at ≥110 mmHg using a linear mixed-effects model and an instrumental variable method. The instrumental variable was calculated as the facility-level percentage of nephrologists who answered in the survey that their lower limit of SBP target was 110 mmHg or higher. A total of 1320 patients (mean age 70 years; 66% men) were included. The mean eGFR slope ± standard deviation over the four years to baseline was -2.48 ± 2.15 mL/min/1.73 m2/year. The instrumental variable for the lower limit of SBP target at ≥110 mmHg (vs. ≤100 mmHg) was associated with less eGFR decline (coefficient: +1.05 mL/min/1.73 m2/year; 95% confidence interval: 0.33-1.77), while unassociated with a history of cardiovascular disease. The renoprotective effect was particularly larger in the subgroups of the elderly and those with a history of cardiovascular disease. In conclusion, the lower limit of SBP target at 110 mmHg or higher was associated with improved eGFR slope, suggesting the importance of aiming at avoiding excessively low SBP in patients with advanced CKD.

The 2021 KDIGO blood pressure target and the progression of chronic kidney disease: Findings from KNOW-CKD

BACKGROUND

The 2021 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline for the management of blood pressure (BP) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) recommends a target systolic BP of <120 mmHg as this target can provide cardiovascular benefits. However, it remains unclear whether implementing the new BP target could improve kidney outcomes.

METHODS

The association between the 2021 KDIGO BP target and CKD progression was examined and compared with the 2012 KDIGO BP target among 1724 participants included in the KoreaN Cohort Study for Outcomes in Patients With CKD. The main exposure was the BP status categorized according to the 2012 or 2021 KDIGO guideline: (1) controlled within the 2021 target, (2) controlled within the 2012 target only, and (3) above both targets. The primary outcome was a composite kidney outcome of ≥50% decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline or the initiation of kidney replacement therapy during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

Composite kidney outcomes occurred in 650 (37.7%) participants during the 8078 person-years of follow-up (median, 4.9 years). The incidence rates of this outcome were 55, 66.5, and 116.4 per 1000 person-years in BP controlled within the 2021 and 2012 KDIGO targets, and BP above both targets, respectively. In the multivariable cause-specific hazard model, hazard ratios for the composite outcome were 0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60-0.95) for BP controlled within the 2021 target and 1.36 (95% CI, 1.13-1.64) for BP above both targets, compared with BP controlled within 2012 target only.

CONCLUSION

The newly lowered BP target by the 2021 KDIGO guideline was associated with improved kidney outcome compared with BP target by the 2012 KDIGO guideline.

Systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and adverse kidney outcome: results from KNOW-CKD

It is unknown whether intensive control of blood pressure (BP) and lipids can delay the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study examined the combined association of strict targets of systolic BP (SBP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels with adverse kidney outcomes. In total, 2012 patients from the KoreaN Cohort Study for Outcomes in Patients With CKD (KNOW-CKD) were classified into four groups according to SBP of 120 mmHg and LDL-C of 70 mg/dl: group 1, <120 and <70; group 2, <120 and ≥70; group 3, ≥120 and <70; group 4, ≥120 and ≥70. We constructed time-varying models treating two variables as time-varying exposures. The primary outcome was the progression of CKD, defined as a ≥50% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate from the baseline or the onset of kidney failure requiring replacement therapy. The primary outcome events occurred in 27.9%, 26.7%, 40.3%, and 39.1% from groups 1 to 4. In the time-varying model, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the primary outcome were 0.48 (0.33-0.69), 0.78 (0.63-0.96), and 0.96 (0.74-1.23) for groups 1 to 3, respectively, compared with group 4. When less stringent cut-offs of SBP of 130 mmHg and LDL-C of 100 mg/dl were used, this graded association was lost, while only SBP was associated with adverse kidney outcomes. In this study, the lower targets of SBP of <120 mmHg and LDL-C < 70 mg/dl were synergistically associated with a lower risk of adverse kidney outcomes.

Hypertension as Cardiovascular Risk Factor in Chronic Kidney Disease

Hypertension is the leading modifiable cause of premature death and hence one of the global targets of World Health Organization for prevention. Hypertension also affects the great majority of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Both hypertension and CKD are intrinsically related, as hypertension is a strong determinant of worse renal and cardiovascular outcomes and renal function decline aggravates hypertension. This bidirectional relationship is well documented by the high prevalence of hypertension across CKD stages and the dual benefits of effective antihypertensive treatments on renal and cardiovascular risk reduction. Achieving an optimal blood pressure (BP) target is mandatory and requires several pharmacological and lifestyle measures. However, it also requires a correct diagnosis based on reliable BP measurements (eg, 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, home BP), especially for populations like patients with CKD where reduced or reverse dipping patterns or masked and resistant hypertension are frequent and associated with a poor cardiovascular and renal prognosis. Even after achieving BP targets, which remain debated in CKD, the residual cardiovascular risk remains high. Current antihypertensive options have been enriched with novel agents that enable to lower the existing renal and cardiovascular risks, such as SGLT2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2) inhibitors and novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Although their beneficial effects may be driven mostly from actions beyond BP control, recent evidence underline potential improvements on abnormal 24-hour BP phenotypes such as nondipping. Other promising novelties are still to come for the management of hypertension in CKD. In the present review, we shall discuss the existing evidence of hypertension as a cardiovascular risk factor in CKD, the importance of identifying hypertension phenotypes among patients with CKD, and the traditional and novel aspects of the management of hypertensives with CKD.

Bidirectional association between SBP variability and arterial stiffness in patients with chronic kidney disease: findings from KNOW-CKD study

OBJECTIVE

Studies on the mutual relationship between blood pressure (BP) variability and arterial stiffness using time-dependent changes in arterial stiffness are scarce.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort of Korean patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) G1-G5 without kidney replacement therapy, we studied the bidirectional association between visit-to-visit SBP variability (VVSV) and arterial stiffness in 1036 participants who underwent brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) measurement at baseline and year four. We constructed multivariable logistic regression models using two analytical sets. First, we determined the VVSV [standard deviation (SD)] of all SBP readings over 4 years, and then calculated the odds ratios (ORs) for arterial stiffness progression according to tertiles of VVSV. Arterial stiffness progression was defined as at least 75th percentile of the difference in baPWV between baseline and year four. Second, we analysed the ORs for at least 75th percentile of the 4-year VVSV according to tertiles of baseline baPWV.

RESULTS

Compared with the lowest tertile of VVSV (SD), the ORs [95% confidence interval (95% CI)] for arterial stiffness progression were 1.42 (0.96-2.10) and 1.64 (1.11-2.43) for the middle and highest tertiles, respectively. In the second analysis based on tertiles of baseline baPWV, the ORs for at least 75th percentile of VVSV (SD) were 1.41 (95% CI, 0.95-2.10) and 1.64 (95% CI, 1.04-2.61) for the middle and highest tertiles, respectively. This association was similar in both analytical models when VVSV and baPWV were treated as continuous variables.

CONCLUSION

There is a bidirectional relationship between BP variability and arterial stiffness in patients with CKD.

Association Between Systolic Blood Pressure Variability and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Korean Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Findings From KNOW-CKD

Background Whether visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability can predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with chronic kidney disease is unclear. Methods and Results We investigated the relationship between SDs of visit-to-visit SBP variability during the first year of enrollment and MACE among 1575 participants from KNOW-CKD (Korean Cohort Study for Outcome in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease). Participants were categorized into 3 groups according to tertiles of visit-to-visit SBP variability (SD). The study end point was MACE, defined as a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or cardiac death. During 6748 patient-years of follow-up (median, 4.2 years), MACE occurred in 64 participants (4.1%). Compared with the lowest tertile of visit-to-visit SBP variability (SD), the hazard ratios (HRs) for the middle and the highest tertile were 1.64 (95% CI, 0.80-3.36) and 2.23 (95% CI, 1.12-4.44), respectively, in a multivariable cause-specific hazard model. In addition, the HR associated with each 5-mm Hg increase in visit-to-visit SBP variability (SD) was 1.21 (95% CI, 1.01-1.45). This association was consistent in sensitivity analyses with 2 additional definitions of SBP variability determined by the coefficient of variation and variation independent of the mean. The corresponding HRs for the middle and highest tertiles were 2.11 (95% CI, 1.03-4.35) and 2.28 (95% CI, 1.12-4.63), respectively, in the analysis with the coefficient of variation and 1.76 (95% CI, 0.87-3.57) and 2.04 (95% CI, 1.03-4.03), respectively, with the variation independent of the mean. Conclusions Higher visit-to-visit SBP variability is associated with an increased risk of MACE in patients with chronic kidney disease. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01630486.