1
|
De Bouver C, Bouziotis J, Wijtvliet VPWM, Ariën KK, Mariën J, Heyndrickx L, Couttenye MM, de Fijter HJW, Mestrez F, Treille S, Mat O, Collart F, Allard SD, Vingerhoets L, Moons P, Abramowicz D, De Winter BY, Pipeleers L, Wissing KM, Ledeganck KJ. Humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in kidney transplant recipients and dialysis patients: IgA and IgG patterns unraveled after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. Virol J 2024; 21:138. [PMID: 38872127 PMCID: PMC11170792 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-024-02410-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infection with SARS-CoV-2 in high-risk groups such as kidney transplant and dialysis patients is shown to be associated with a more serious course of the disease. Four years after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, crucial knowledge on the immune responses in these patient groups is still lacking. Therefore, this study aimed at investigating the humoral immune response after a SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to vaccination as well as the evolution of immunoglobulins over time. METHODS Kidney transplant recipients, patients on haemodialysis or on peritoneal dialysis and healthy controls were included in this longitudinal multicenter study. SARS-CoV-2 anti-RBD, anti-NP and anti-S1S2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) and A (IgA) as well as the neutralizing antibody capacity were measured. RESULTS Kidney transplant recipients had a significantly better humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 after infection (86.4%) than after a two-dose mRNA vaccination (55.8%) while seroconversion was comparable in patients on haemodialysis after infection (95.8%) versus vaccination (89.4%). In individuals without prior COVID-19, the IgG levels after vaccination were significantly lower in kidney transplant recipients when compared to all other groups. However, the IgA titres remained the highest in this patient group at each time point, both after infection and vaccination. A history COVID-19 was associated with higher antibody levels after double-dose vaccination in all patient categories and, while decreasing, titres remained high six months after double-dose vaccination. CONCLUSION Kidney transplant recipients had a more robust humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 following infection compared to a two-dose mRNA vaccination, while patients on haemodialysis exhibited comparable seroconversion rates. Notably, individuals with prior COVID-19 exhibited higher IgG levels in response to vaccination. Hybrid immunity is thus the best possible defence against severe COVID-19 disease and seems also to hold up for these populations. Next, it is not clear whether the higher IgA levels in the kidney transplant recipients is beneficial for neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 or if it is a sign of disease severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline De Bouver
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics and member of the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jason Bouziotis
- Clinical Trial Center (CTC), CRC Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Veerle P W M Wijtvliet
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics and member of the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Kevin K Ariën
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Virology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Joachim Mariën
- Virology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Leo Heyndrickx
- Virology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marie M Couttenye
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics and member of the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Hans J W de Fijter
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics and member of the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Fabienne Mestrez
- Department of Nephrology-Dialysis, University Hospital (CHU) Ambroise Paré, Mons, Belgium
| | - Serge Treille
- Department of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - Olivier Mat
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Centre EpiCURA, Ath, Belgium
| | - Frederic Collart
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitaire Brugmann, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sabine D Allard
- Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Pieter Moons
- Biobank Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Daniel Abramowicz
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics and member of the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Benedicte Y De Winter
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics and member of the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lissa Pipeleers
- Department of Nephrology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Karl Martin Wissing
- Department of Nephrology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kristien J Ledeganck
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics and member of the Infla-Med Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Platen L, Liao BH, Tellenbach M, Cheng CC, Holzmann-Littig C, Christa C, Dächert C, Kappler V, Bester R, Werz ML, Schönhals E, Platen E, Eggerer P, Tréguer L, Küchle C, Schmaderer C, Heemann U, Keppler OT, Renders L, Braunisch MC, Protzer U. Longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 neutralization of Omicron BA.1, BA.5 and BQ.1.1 after four vaccinations and the impact of breakthrough infections in haemodialysis patients. Clin Kidney J 2023; 16:2447-2460. [PMID: 38046025 PMCID: PMC10689143 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Individuals on haemodialysis (HD) are more vulnerable to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection than the general population due to end-stage kidney disease-induced immunosuppression. Methods A total of 26 HD patients experiencing SARS-CoV-2 infection after a third vaccination were matched 1:1 with 26 of 92 SARS-CoV-2-naïve patients by age, sex, dialysis vintage and immunosuppressive drugs receiving a fourth vaccination with a messenger RNA-based vaccine. A competitive surrogate neutralization assay was used to monitor vaccination success. To determine infection neutralization titres, Vero-E6 cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VoCs), Omicron sublineage BA.1, BA.5 and BQ.1.1. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50, serum dilution factor 1:x) was determined before, 4 weeks after and 6 months after the fourth vaccination. Results A total of 52 HD patients received four coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations and were followed up for a median of 6.3 months. Patient characteristics did not differ between the matched cohorts. Patients without a SARS-CoV-2 infection had a significant reduction of real virus neutralization capacity for all Omicron sublineages after 6 months (P < .001 each). Those patients with a virus infection did not experience a reduction in real virus neutralization capacity after 6 months. Compared with the other Omicron VoC, the BQ.1.1 sublineage had the lowest virus neutralization capacity. Conclusions SARS-CoV-2-naïve HD patients had significantly decreased virus neutralization capacity 6 months after the fourth vaccination, whereas patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection had no change in neutralization capacity. This was independent of age, sex, dialysis vintage and immunosuppression. Therefore, in infection-naïve HD patients a fifth COVID-19 vaccination might be reasonable 6 months after the fourth vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Platen
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Bo-Hung Liao
- Institute of Virology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Myriam Tellenbach
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Cho-Chin Cheng
- Institute of Virology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Christopher Holzmann-Littig
- Institute of Virology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
- TUM Medical Education Center, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Catharina Christa
- Institute of Virology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Christopher Dächert
- Max von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Verena Kappler
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Romina Bester
- Institute of Virology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Maia Lucia Werz
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Emely Schönhals
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Eva Platen
- Kidney Center Eifel Dialyse, Mechernich, Germany
| | - Peter Eggerer
- KfH Kidney Center Harlaching, Munich-Harlaching, Germany
| | - Laëtitia Tréguer
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site, Munich, Germany
| | - Claudius Küchle
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Schmaderer
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Uwe Heemann
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site, Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver T Keppler
- Max von Pettenkofer Institute & Gene Center, Virology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site, Munich, Germany
| | - Lutz Renders
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
- KfH Kidney Center, Traunstein, Germany
| | - Matthias Christoph Braunisch
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrike Protzer
- Institute of Virology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Virology, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Quiroga B, Soler MJ, Ortiz A, de Sequera P. Lessons from SENCOVAC: A prospective study evaluating the response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the CKD spectrum. Nefrologia 2023; 43:676-687. [PMID: 37150670 PMCID: PMC10160849 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2023.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has negatively impacted on patients of the whole CKD spectrum, causing high rates of morbi-mortality. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines opened a new era, but patients with CKD (including kidney transplant, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis) were systematically excluded from pivotal clinical trials. The Spanish Society of Nephrology promoted the multicentric national SENCOVAC study aimed at assessing immunological responses after vaccination in patients with CKD. During the first year after vaccination, patients with non-dialysis CKD and those on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis presented good anti-Spike antibody responses to vaccination, especially after receiving the third and fourth doses. However, kidney transplant recipients presented suboptimal responses after any vaccination schedule (initial, third and fourth dose). Especially worrisome is the situation of a patients with a persistently negative humoral response that do not seroconvert after boosters. In this regard, monoclonal antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 have been approved for high-risk patients, although they may become obsolete as the viral genome evolves. The present report reviews the current status of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the CKD spectrum with emphasis on lessons learned from the SENCOVAC study. Predictors of humoral response, including vaccination schedules and types of vaccines, as well as the integration of vaccines, monoclonal antibodies and antiviral agents are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borja Quiroga
- IIS-La Princesa, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - María José Soler
- Nephrology Department, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain.
| | - Alberto Ortiz
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain; IIS-Fundación Jiménez Diaz, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Fundación Renal Iñigo Álvarez de Toledo-IRSIN, REDinREN, Instituto de Investigación Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Patricia de Sequera
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain; Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor - Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rossi M, Pessolano G, Gambaro G. What has vaccination against COVID-19 in CKD patients taught us? J Nephrol 2023; 36:1257-1266. [PMID: 37140817 PMCID: PMC10157569 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-023-01640-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Effective vaccination strategies are of crucial importance to protecting patients who are vulnerable to infections, such as patients with chronic kidney disease. This is because the decreased efficiency of the immune system in chronic kidney disease impairs vaccine-induced immunisation. COVID-19 has prompted investigation of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in chronic kidney disease and in kidney transplant recipients in an effort to improve efficacy. The seroconversion rate after two vaccine doses is reduced, especially in kidney transplant recipients. Furthermore, although the seroconversion rate in chronic kidney disease patients is as high as in healthy subjects, anti-spike antibody titres are lower than in healthy vaccinated individuals, and these titres decrease rapidly. Although the vaccine-induced anti-spike antibody titre correlates with neutralising antibody levels and with protection against COVID-19, the protective prognostic significance of their titre is decreased due to the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants other than the Wuhan index virus against which the original vaccines were produced. Cellular immunity is also relevant, and because of cross-reactivity to the spike protein, epitopes of different viral variants confer protection against newly emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2. A multi-dose vaccination strategy is the most effective way to obtain a sufficient serological response. In kidney transplant recipients, a 5-week discontinuation period from antimetabolite drugs in concomitance with vaccine administration may also increase the vaccine's efficacy. The newly acquired knowledge obtained from COVID-19 vaccination is of general interest for the success of other vaccinations in chronic kidney disease patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Rossi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Giuseppina Pessolano
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Gambaro
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale A. Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Quiroga B, Soler MJ, Ortiz A, Sequera PD. Lessons from SENCOVAC: A prospective study evaluating the response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the CKD spectrum. Nefrologia 2022; 43:S0211-6995(22)00201-6. [PMID: 36540904 PMCID: PMC9756643 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2022.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has negatively impacted on patients of the whole CKD spectrum, causing high rates of morbi-mortality. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines opened a new era, but patients with CKD (including kidney transplant, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis) were systematically excluded from pivotal clinical trials. The Spanish Society of Nephrology promoted the multicentric national SENCOVAC study aimed at assessing immunological responses after vaccination in patients with CKD. During the first year after vaccination, patients with non-dialysis CKD and those on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis presented good anti-Spike antibody responses to vaccination, especially after receiving the third and fourth doses. However, kidney transplant recipients presented suboptimal responses after any vaccination schedule (initial, third and fourth dose). Especially worrisome is the situation of a patients with a persistently negative humoral response that do not seroconvert after boosters. In this regard, monoclonal antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 have been approved for high-risk patients, although they may become obsolete as the viral genome evolves. The present report reviews the current status of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the CKD spectrum with emphasis on lessons learned from the SENCOVAC study. Predictors of humoral response, including vaccination schedules and types of vaccines, as well as the integration of vaccines, monoclonal antibodies and antiviral agents are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borja Quiroga
- IIS-La Princesa. Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - María José Soler
- Nephrology Department, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain
| | - Alberto Ortiz
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain
- IIS-Fundación Jiménez Diaz, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Fundación Renal Iñigo Álvarez de Toledo-IRSIN, REDinREN, Instituto de Investigación Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patricia de Sequera
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor - Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Long-Term Dynamic Humoral Response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10101738. [PMID: 36298603 PMCID: PMC9609237 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10101738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) present an impaired humoral response against SARS-CoV-2, at least after the initial vaccination and booster dose. Until now, the effect of a fourth dose has not been established. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the long-term dynamics of the humoral response of PD patients to multiple doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, focusing on the effect of the fourth dose. Methods. This is an analysis of the prospective and multicentric SENCOVAC study. We included patients on PD without additional immunosuppression that had received at least 3 SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine doses. We evaluated anti-spike antibody titers after the initial vaccination, third and fourth doses, using prespecified fixed assessments (i.e., baseline, 28 days, 3, 6, and 12 months after completing the initial vaccine schedule). Breakthrough infections were also collected. Results. We included 164 patients on PD (69% males, 62 ± 13 years old). In patients who had received only two doses, the rates of positive humoral response progressively decreased from 96% at 28 days to 80% at 6 months, as did with anti-spike antibody titers. At 6 months, 102 (62%) patients had received the third vaccine dose. Patients with the third dose had higher rates of positive humoral response (p = 0.01) and higher anti-spike antibody titers (p < 0.001) at 6 months than those with only 2 doses. At 12 months, the whole cohort had received 3 vaccine doses, and 44 (27%) patients had an additional fourth dose. The fourth dose was not associated to higher rates of positive humoral response (100 vs. 97%, p = 0.466) or to statistically significant differences in anti-spike antibody titers as compared to three doses (p = 0.371) at 12 months. Prior antibody titers were the only predictor for subsequent higher anti-spike antibody titer (B 0.53 [95%CI 0.27−0.78], p < 0.001). The 2 (1.2%) patients that developed COVID-19 during follow-up had mild disease. Conclusions. PD presents an acceptable humoral response with three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines that improve the progressive loss of anti-spike antibody titers following two vaccine doses.
Collapse
|
7
|
Villanego F, Mazuecos A, Cubillo B, Merino MJ, Poveda I, Saura IM, Segurado Ó, Cruzado L, Eady M, Zárraga S, Aladrén MJ, Cabello S, López V, González E, Lorenzo I, Espí-Reig J, Fernández C, Osma J, Ruiz-Fuentes MC, Toapanta N, Franco A, Burballa CC, Muñoz MA, Crespo M, Pascual J. Treatment with sotrovimab for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort of high-risk kidney transplant recipients. Clin Kidney J 2022; 15:1847-1855. [PMID: 36147706 PMCID: PMC9384612 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sotrovimab is a neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb) that seems to remain active against recent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants. The evidence on its use in kidney transplant (KT) recipients, however, is limited. Methods We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 82 KT patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection {coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]} treated with sotrovimab. Results Median age was 63 years. Diabetes was present in 43.9% of patients, and obesity in 32.9% of patients; 48.8% of patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate under 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2. Additional anti-COVID-19 therapies were administered to 56 patients, especially intravenous steroids (65.9%). Sotrovimab was administered early (<5 days from the onset of the symptoms) in 46 patients (56%). Early-treated patients showed less likely progression to severe COVID-19 than those treated later, represented as a lower need for ventilator support (2.2% vs 36.1%; P < .001) or intensive care admission (2.2% vs 25%; P = .002) and COVID-19-related mortality (2.2% vs 16.7%; P = .020). In the multivariable analysis, controlling for baseline risk factors to severe COVID-19 in KT recipients, early use of sotrovimab remained as a protective factor for a composite outcome, including need for ventilator support, intensive care, and COVID-19-related mortality. No anaphylactic reactions, acute rejection episodes, impaired kidney function events, or non-kidney side effects related to sotrovimab were observed. Conclusions Sotrovimab had an excellent safety profile, even in high-comorbidity patients and advanced chronic kidney disease stages. Earlier administration could prevent progression to severe disease, while clinical outcomes were poor in patients treated later. Larger controlled studies enrolling KT recipients are warranted to elucidate the true efficacy of monoclonal antibody therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Beatriz Cubillo
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - M José Merino
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Poveda
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario Torrecárdenas, Almería, Spain
| | - Isabel M Saura
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Óscar Segurado
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain
| | - Leónidas Cruzado
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain
| | - Myriam Eady
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain
| | - Sofía Zárraga
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Bilbao, Spain
| | - M José Aladrén
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Sheila Cabello
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Verónica López
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Universidad de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, REDinREN (RD16/0009/0006), Málaga, Spain
| | - Esther González
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Institute i+12 for Medical Research, Madrid, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Lorenzo
- Department of Nephrology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain
| | - Jordi Espí-Reig
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Constantino Fernández
- Department of Nephrology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - July Osma
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - M Carmen Ruiz-Fuentes
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - Néstor Toapanta
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Carla C Burballa
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, REDinREN (RD16/0009/0013), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel A Muñoz
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Marta Crespo
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, REDinREN (RD16/0009/0013), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julio Pascual
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Germain DP, Altarescu G, Barriales-Villa R, Mignani R, Pawlaczyk K, Pieruzzi F, Terryn W, Vujkovac B, Ortiz A. An expert consensus on practical clinical recommendations and guidance for patients with classic Fabry disease. Mol Genet Metab 2022; 137:49-61. [PMID: 35926321 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2022.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Fabry disease is an X-linked inherited lysosomal disorder that causes accumulation of glycosphingolipids in body fluids and tissues, leading to progressive organ damage and reduced life expectancy. It can affect both males and females and can be classified into classic or later-onset phenotypes. In classic Fabry disease, α-galactosidase A (α-Gal A) activity is absent or severely reduced and disease manifestations have an early onset that can affect multiple organs. In contrast, in later-onset Fabry disease, patients have residual α-Gal A activity and clinical features are primarily confined to the heart. Individualized therapeutic goals in Fabry disease are required due to varying phenotypes and patient characteristics, and the wide spectrum of disease severity. An international group of expert physicians convened to discuss and develop practical clinical recommendations for disease- and organ-specific therapeutic goals in Fabry disease, based on expert consensus and evidence identified through a structured literature review. Biomarkers reflecting involvement of various organs in adult patients with classic Fabry disease are discussed and consensus recommendations for disease- and organ-specific therapeutic goals are provided. These consensus recommendations should support the establishment of individualized approaches to the management of patients with classic Fabry disease by considering identification, diagnosis, and initiation of disease-specific therapies before significant organ involvement, as well as routine monitoring, to reduce morbidity, optimize patient care, and improve patient health-related quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique P Germain
- French Referral Center for Fabry disease and MetabERN European Reference Network for Inherited Metabolic Diseases, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Versailles, Paris-Saclay University, 2, allée de la source de la Bièvre, 78180 Montigny, France
| | - Gheona Altarescu
- Shaare Zedek Institute of Medical Genetics, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Shmu'el Bait St 12, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel
| | - Roberto Barriales-Villa
- Unidad de Cardiopatías Familiares, Hospital Universitario da Coruña, (INIBIC/CIBERCV), As Xubias, 84, 15006 A Coruña, Spain
| | - Renzo Mignani
- Department of Nephrology, Infermi Hospital, Viale Luigi Settembrini, 2, 47923 Rimini, RN, Italy
| | - Krzysztof Pawlaczyk
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Collegium Maius, Fredry 10, 61-701 Poznań, Poland
| | - Federico Pieruzzi
- Nephrology Clinic, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126 Milano, MI, Italy; Nephrology and Dialysis Department, ASST-Monza, San-Gerardo Hospital, Via Aliprandi, 23, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Wim Terryn
- General Internal Medicine and Nephrology, Jan Yperman Hospital, Briekestraat 12, 8900 Ypres, Belgium
| | - Bojan Vujkovac
- Fabry Center, Slovenj Gradec General Hospital, Gosposvetska cesta 3, 2380 Slovenj Gradec, Slovenia
| | - Alberto Ortiz
- Jiménez Díaz Foundation University Hospital, Avda. Reyes Católicos, 2, 28040 Madrid, Spain; Department of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Quiroga B, Soler MJ, Ortiz A, Mantecón CJJ, Pérez NN, Martín MS, Sato Y, Franco AJM, Zambrano DFP, Valverde RL, Diaz MO, González CC, López JMC, Pereira M, Parra EG, Horrillo AS, González CS, Toapanta N, Guldris SC, Hernández RS, Sánchez SP, Rincón MM, Garcia-Fernandez N, Castro NB, Mateo RC, Morales MAQ, Escamilla-Cabrera B, Godoy IB, Casanova BGC, Leyva A, Rojas J, Gansevoort RT, de Sequera P, Carretero MP, Tocora DG, Rodríguez MTJ, Zanón TT, Suárez ER, Santolaya AJS, Calero RC, Cobo PA, Ramos PM, Gracia-Iguacel C, Martin-Cleary C, Sánchez-Rodríguez J, Ramos-Verde A, Giraldo YG, Suárez PR, Perpén AF, Ramos AF, Villanueva LS, Cortiñas A, Arias PAD, Cárdenas AC, de Santos A, Núñez A, Cuadrado GB, Repollet R, Moreso F, Azancot MA, Ramos N, Bestard O, Cidraque I, Bermejo S, Agraz I, Prat O, Medina C, Pardo E, Saiz A, Granados NM, Cabo MJC, Alarcón WL, Alexandru S, Suarez LGP, Saico SP, Tapia MP, Osorio LR, Zamora R, Moreno PLM, González NA, Ortiz AS, Iñarrea MNB, García T, Narváez C, Orellana C, León JLP, García MAM, Jiménez BG, Moya JDDR, Espinosa DL, Herrador AJ, Zurita MN, Díaz Álvarez L, Martínez ÁG, Arroyo SB, Fernández RR, Vargas MJS, Casero RC, Useche G, de Miguel CS, Palacios Á, Henningsmeyer B, Calve EO, Moya JL, Gash SC, Martínez LR, Perez VLDLM, Arevalo MC, Calvo JAH, Salgueira M, Aresté N, Rodríguez MDLÁ, Collantes R, Martínez AI, Moyano MJ, Víbora EJ, Hernández APR, Rebollo MSG, Hernández JMR, Aguilera ET, Alea RT, Saldaña MSDR, de la Pisa AMU, Monzon LS, Anachuri KA, Garcia EH, Gomez VO, Cavalotti IM, Zorita IN, López SO, González SO, Montañez CS, Serna MRDA, Perich LG, de la Rosa EC. Anti-Spike antibodies three months after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine booster dose in patients on hemodialysis: the prospective SENCOVAC study. Clin Kidney J 2022; 15:1856-1864. [PMID: 36147708 PMCID: PMC9384616 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Patients on hemodialysis are at high-risk for complications derived from coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). The present analysis evaluated the impact of a booster vaccine dose and breakthrough severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections on humoral immunity three months after the booster dose.
Methods
This is a multicentric and prospective study assessing IgG anti-Spike antibodies 6 and 9 months after initial SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients on hemodialysis that had also received a booster dose before the 6-month assessment (early booster) or between the 6- and 9-month assessments (late booster). The impact of breakthrough infections, type of vaccine, time from the booster and clinical variables were assessed.
Results
A total of 711 patients (67% male, 67 [20-89] years) were included. Of which, 545 (77%) received an early booster and the rest a late booster. At 6 months, 64 (9%) patients had negative anti-Spike antibody titers (3% of early booster and 29% of late booster patients, p = 0.001). At 9 months, 91% of patients with 6-month negative response had seroconverted and there were no differences in residual prevalence of negative humoral response between early and late booster patients (0.9% vs 0.6%, p = 0.693). During follow-up, 35 patients (5%) developed breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection. Antibody titers at 9 months were independently associated to mRNA-1273 booster (p = 0.001), lower time from booster (p = 0.043) and past breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection (p<0.001).
Conclusions
In hemodialysis patients, higher titers of anti-Spike antibodies at 9 months were associated to mRNA-1273 booster, lower time from booster and past breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borja Quiroga
- IIS-La Princesa. Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa , Madrid ( Spain )
| | - María José Soler
- Nephrology Department, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital , 08035 Barcelona ( Spain )
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease)
| | - Alberto Ortiz
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease)
- IIS-Fundación Jiménez Diaz, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Fundación Renal Iñigo Álvarez de Toledo-IRSIN, REDinREN, Instituto de Investigación Carlos III , Madrid ( Spain )
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rafael Lucena Valverde
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor – Universidad Complutense de Madrid ( Spain )
| | - Mayra Ortega Diaz
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor – Universidad Complutense de Madrid ( Spain )
| | | | | | - Mónica Pereira
- IIS-Fundación Jiménez Diaz, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Fundación Renal Iñigo Álvarez de Toledo-IRSIN, REDinREN, Instituto de Investigación Carlos III , Madrid ( Spain )
| | - Emilio González Parra
- IIS-Fundación Jiménez Diaz, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Fundación Renal Iñigo Álvarez de Toledo-IRSIN, REDinREN, Instituto de Investigación Carlos III , Madrid ( Spain )
| | - Ana Sánchez Horrillo
- IIS-La Princesa. Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa , Madrid ( Spain )
| | - Carmen Sánchez González
- IIS-La Princesa. Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa , Madrid ( Spain )
| | - Néstor Toapanta
- Nephrology Department, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital , 08035 Barcelona ( Spain )
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alba Leyva
- R&D Department , VIRCELL SL, Granada ( Spain )
| | - José Rojas
- R&D Department , VIRCELL SL, Granada ( Spain )
| | - Ron T Gansevoort
- Dept. Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen , Groningen , The Netherlands
| | - Patricia de Sequera
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease)
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor – Universidad Complutense de Madrid ( Spain )
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Humoral immunity against Covid-19 six months after the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine in hemodialysis patients: data from five dialysis units. Is there a protective role for hemodiafiltration in the Covid-19 pandemic? J Nephrol 2022; 35:1543-1545. [PMID: 35670962 PMCID: PMC9171482 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-022-01350-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
11
|
Rivera JCHH, Mendoza MS, Covarrubias LG, Ramírez ALQ, Reyes LC, Hernández MB, Martínez JR, Contla YP, Durán JMV, Rivas AT, Flores SLR, Murillo WAQ, Sierra JRP. Mortality due to COVID-19 in renal transplant recipients, related to variants of SARS-CoV-2 and vaccination in Mexico. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:1434-1438. [PMID: 35931470 PMCID: PMC9156950 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Background SARS-CoV-2 infection in transplant patients has shown greater lethality and vaccination in this group of patients has shown less information. The objective of this study is to show the statistics in Mexico of lethality in kidney recipients infected with COVID-19 in relation to vaccination and variants of the coronavirus. Methods This is a bibliographic search of kidney transplant recipient patients since the start of the pandemic in Mexico to determine lethality after SARS-CoV-2 compared to the general population and in relation to patients, the 4 most important infectious peaks in the country due to identified variants, and also before and after vaccination. Results The global lethality is 26.91% from the beginning of the pandemic to April 9, 2022 in kidney recipients in Mexico (130 deaths of 483 infected kidney transplant recipients) compared to the national lethality of 5.60%. Variant B. 1.1.220 represented the highest lethality with 30.43% and the lowest lethality was Omicron with 16.41%. The lethality prior to vaccination was 30.94% and 23.46% after it. Conclusion Both some variants and vaccination have influenced a lower lethality due to COVID-19 in Mexico in kidney transplant patients; It is important to consider global recommendations, such as a third or fourth dose, a combination of mRNA vaccines and vectors in order to reduce lethality in this group of patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Quiroga B, Soler MJ, Ortiz A, Orero E, Tejedor S, Mantecón CJJ, Gómez Pérez VO, Marín Franco AJ, Alfaro Sánchez C, Puerta Carretero M, Jaldo Rodríguez MT, Carnerero Di Riso MA, Martínez S, González CC, Cervienka M, Macías Carmona N, Arroyo D, Pérez Del Valle KM, de Arriba G, Mazuecos A, Cazorla JM, Pereira M, González Parra E, Sánchez Márquez MG, Lancho Novillo C, Toyos Ruiz C, Aguilar Cervera MC, Muñoz Ramos P, Sánchez Horrillo A, Jimeno Martín I, Toapanta N, Cigarrán Guldris S, Folgueiras López M, Valero San Cecilio R, Villacorta Linaza B, Minguela Pesquera I, Santana Estupiñán R, Zamora R, Soriano S, Muñoz de Bustillo E, Pizarro Sánchez MS, Martínez Puerto AI, Yugueros A, Muñiz Pacios L, Leyva A, Rojas J, Gansevoort RT, de Sequera P. Humoral Response to Third Dose of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in the CKD Spectrum. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:872-876. [PMID: 35551070 PMCID: PMC9269649 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.01770222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Borja Quiroga
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria-La Princesa, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - María José Soler
- Nephrology Department, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain .,Redes de Investigación Cooperativa Orientadas a Resultados en Salud (RICORS), RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain
| | - Alberto Ortiz
- Redes de Investigación Cooperativa Orientadas a Resultados en Salud (RICORS), RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain .,Nephrology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria-Fundación Jiménez Diaz, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Fundación Renal Iñigo Álvarez de Toledo-IRSIN, Red de Investigación Renal, Instituto de Investigación Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marta Puerta Carretero
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David Arroyo
- Nephrology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Mónica Pereira
- Nephrology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria-Fundación Jiménez Diaz, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Fundación Renal Iñigo Álvarez de Toledo-IRSIN, Red de Investigación Renal, Instituto de Investigación Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emilio González Parra
- Nephrology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria-Fundación Jiménez Diaz, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Fundación Renal Iñigo Álvarez de Toledo-IRSIN, Red de Investigación Renal, Instituto de Investigación Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Patricia Muñoz Ramos
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria-La Princesa, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Sánchez Horrillo
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria-La Princesa, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Néstor Toapanta
- Nephrology Department, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Rosalía Valero San Cecilio
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valedecilla, Santander, Spain
| | | | | | - Raquel Santana Estupiñán
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Rocío Zamora
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario General de Villalba, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Alejandra Yugueros
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Lluis Alcanyis De Xátiva, Valencia, Spain
| | - Laura Muñiz Pacios
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alba Leyva
- Research and Development Department, Vircell Sociedad Limitada, Granada, Spain
| | - José Rojas
- Research and Development Department, Vircell Sociedad Limitada, Granada, Spain
| | - Ron T Gansevoort
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhang YM, Liu XZ, Lin MM, Zan JC, Hu YT, Wang XQ, Wu WQ, Zhou TC, Lv JC, Zhang H, Yang L, Zhang ZJ. Immunosuppression impaired the immunogenicity of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in non-dialysis kidney disease patients. J Infect 2022; 85:174-211. [PMID: 35550381 PMCID: PMC9081041 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yue-Miao Zhang
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Renal Pathology Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China; Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of Immune-Mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Xing-Zi Liu
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Renal Pathology Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China; Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of Immune-Mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Miao-Miao Lin
- Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Jin-Can Zan
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Renal Pathology Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China; Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of Immune-Mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Yi-Tong Hu
- Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Xiang-Qiu Wang
- Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Wen-Qi Wu
- Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Tai-Cheng Zhou
- Center Lab and Liver Disease Research Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan 650091, China
| | - Ji-Cheng Lv
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Renal Pathology Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China; Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of Immune-Mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100034, China.
| | - Hong Zhang
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Renal Pathology Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China; Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of Immune-Mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100034, China.
| | - Li Yang
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Renal Pathology Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China; Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of Immune-Mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100034, China.
| | - Zi-Jie Zhang
- State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-resource and School of Life Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan 650091, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Füessl L, Lau T, Lean I, Hasmann S, Riedl B, Arend FM, Sorodoc-Otto J, Soreth-Rieke D, Toepfer M, Rau S, Salihi-Halimi H, Paal M, Beuthien W, Thaller N, Suttmann Y, von Gersdorff G, Regenauer R, von Bergwelt-Baildon A, Teupser D, Bruegel M, Fischereder M, Schönermarck U. Diminished Short- and Long-Term Antibody Response after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Hemodialysis Patients. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10040605. [PMID: 35455353 PMCID: PMC9031197 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10040605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Short-term studies have shown an attenuated immune response in hemodialysis patients after COVID-19-vaccination. The present study examines how antibody response is maintained after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in a large population of hemodialysis patients from six outpatient dialysis centers. We retrospectively assessed serum antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleocapsid protein (electrochemiluminescence immunoassays, Roche Diagnostics) after COVID-19-vaccination in 298 hemodialysis and 103 non-dialysis patients (controls), comparing early and late antibody response. Compared to a non-dialysis cohort hemodialysis patients showed a favorable but profoundly lower early antibody response, which decreased substantially during follow-up measurement (median 6 months after vaccination). Significantly more hemodialysis patients had anti-SARS-CoV-2-S antibody titers below 100 U/mL (p < 0.001), which increased during follow-up from 23% to 45% but remained low in the control group (3% vs. 7%). In multivariate analysis, previous COVID-19 infections (p < 0.001) and female gender (p < 0.05) were significantly associated with higher early as well as late antibody vaccine response in hemodialysis patients, while there was a significant inverse correlation between patient age and systemic immunosuppression (p < 0.001). The early and late antibody responses were significantly higher in patients receiving vaccination after a SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to uninfected patients in both groups (p < 0.05). We also note that a higher titer after complete immunization positively affected late antibody response. The observation, that hemodialysis patients showed a significantly stronger decline of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination antibody titers within 6 months, compared to controls, supports the need for booster vaccinations to foster a stronger and more persistent antibody response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Füessl
- Department of Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.F.); (I.L.); (S.H.); (R.R.); (A.v.B.-B.); (M.F.)
| | - Tobias Lau
- Dialysezentrum Bad Tölz und Wolfratshausen, 83646 Bad Tölz, Germany; (T.L.); (S.R.)
| | - Isaac Lean
- Department of Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.F.); (I.L.); (S.H.); (R.R.); (A.v.B.-B.); (M.F.)
| | - Sandra Hasmann
- Department of Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.F.); (I.L.); (S.H.); (R.R.); (A.v.B.-B.); (M.F.)
| | - Bernhard Riedl
- KfH-Nierenzentrum Bayreuth, 95445 Bayreuth, Germany; (B.R.); (H.S.-H.)
| | - Florian M. Arend
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.M.A.); (M.P.); (D.T.); (M.B.)
| | - Johanna Sorodoc-Otto
- KfH-Nierenzentrum Germering, 82110 Germering, Germany; (J.S.-O.); (W.B.); (Y.S.)
| | | | - Marcell Toepfer
- Dialysezentrum Garmisch-Partenkirchen-Murnau-Weilheim, 82418 Murnau, Germany;
| | - Simon Rau
- Dialysezentrum Bad Tölz und Wolfratshausen, 83646 Bad Tölz, Germany; (T.L.); (S.R.)
| | | | - Michael Paal
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.M.A.); (M.P.); (D.T.); (M.B.)
| | - Wilke Beuthien
- KfH-Nierenzentrum Germering, 82110 Germering, Germany; (J.S.-O.); (W.B.); (Y.S.)
| | - Norbert Thaller
- KfH-Nierenzentrum Miesbach, 83714 Miesbach, Germany; (D.S.-R.); (N.T.)
| | - Yana Suttmann
- KfH-Nierenzentrum Germering, 82110 Germering, Germany; (J.S.-O.); (W.B.); (Y.S.)
| | - Gero von Gersdorff
- QiN-Group, Department II of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Ron Regenauer
- Department of Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.F.); (I.L.); (S.H.); (R.R.); (A.v.B.-B.); (M.F.)
| | - Anke von Bergwelt-Baildon
- Department of Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.F.); (I.L.); (S.H.); (R.R.); (A.v.B.-B.); (M.F.)
| | - Daniel Teupser
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.M.A.); (M.P.); (D.T.); (M.B.)
| | - Mathias Bruegel
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.M.A.); (M.P.); (D.T.); (M.B.)
| | - Michael Fischereder
- Department of Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.F.); (I.L.); (S.H.); (R.R.); (A.v.B.-B.); (M.F.)
| | - Ulf Schönermarck
- Department of Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.F.); (I.L.); (S.H.); (R.R.); (A.v.B.-B.); (M.F.)
- Correspondence: ; Fax: +49-89-4400-72362
| |
Collapse
|