Which hypoglycaemic agents to use in type 2 diabetic subjects with CKD and how?

The change in Fibrosis-4 index in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated by a fixed-ratio combination therapy of insulin degludec and liraglutide: A retrospective observational study

AIM

The efficacy of titratable fixed-ratio combination therapy by a combination preparation of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes, focusing particularly on the change in Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), a noninvasive method for the evaluation of liver fibrosis, was investigated.

METHODS

As the full analysis set, 113 patients were treated with IDegLira. The patients were categorized into two groups according to the absence (GLP-1RA-naïve group, n = 72) or presence (GLP-1RA-treated group, n = 41) of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use before starting IDegLira. The clinical parameters were retrospectively determined over 6 months.

RESULTS

The glycated hemoglobin value was significantly reduced in both groups. The bodyweight significantly decreased from 67.4 ± 11.0 kg at baseline to 66.4 ± 11.6 kg at 6 months in the GLP-1RA-naïve group, although it slightly increased in the GLP-1RA-treated group. FIB-4 significantly decreased from 1.60 ± 0.84 at baseline to 1.49 ± 0.74 at 6 months in the GLP-1RA-naïve group. Although FIB-4 significantly increased in the GLP-1RA-treated group, it remained within the low-risk level for liver fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

Fixed-ratio combination therapy using IDegLira for the treatment of type 2 diabetes is useful for glycemic control and weight management. In particular, IDegLira may be more effective for lowering FIB-4 than adding unused oral antidiabetic agents or increasing the dose of insulin in GLP-1RA-naïve patients.

Characteristics of patients with emergency attendance for severe hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia in a general hospital in Japan

Despite advances in treatments for diabetes mellitus (DM), severe acute glycemic crises still occur. In this study, the characteristics of patients who were transported to an emergency department due to acute glycemic crises were investigated.We enrolled patients who were transported to our hospital by ambulance due to hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia during the period from January 2015 to December 2019. Initial glucose levels below 70 mg/dL and above 250 mg/dL were defined as hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, respectively.In the 5-year period, 16,910 patients were transported to our hospital by ambulance. Of those patients, 87 patients (0.51%) were diagnosed with hypoglycemia, 26 patients (0.15%) were diagnosed with hyperglycemia and 1 patient was diagnosed with lactic acidosis. Compared to patients with hypoglycemia, blood urea nitrogen, serum potassium and hemoglobin levels were higher in patients with hyperglycemia. Systolic blood pressure was lower and pulse rate was higher in patients with hyperglycemia, possibly reflecting dehydration in hyperglycemia. Patients with hyperglycemia were younger (63 vs 70 years old, median), more likely to be hospitalized (92.3% vs 23.0%) with poorer prognosis (23.1% vs 4.6%) than those with hypoglycemia. In 64 DM patients with hypoglycemia, 34 patients were treated with insulin and 24 patients were treated with sulfonylurea or glinide, and their medication was often inappropriate. Excessive alcohol intake and malnutrition were the main causes of hypoglycemia in 23 non-DM patients. The main reasons for hyperglycemia were interrupted treatment, forgetting insulin injection and infection.To avoid acute glycemic crises, optimization of anti-DM therapy and education of patients are needed.

Temporal Trends of Severe Hypoglycemia and Subsequent Mortality in Patients with Advanced Diabetic Kidney Diseases Transitioning to Dialysis

Background: Patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) are at higher risk of hypoglycemia than diabetic patients without DKD. We aimed to investigate the temporal trends of severe hypoglycemia in advanced DKD patients transitioning to dialysis and examine risk factors associated with severe hypoglycemia. We also investigated the association of severe hypoglycemia episodes with one-year mortality after initiation of dialysis in patients with advanced DKD. Methods: Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, 46,779 advanced DKD patients transitioning to dialysis (Peritoneal dialysis 4216, hemodialysis 42,563) between 1997 and 2011 were enrolled. We calculated the rates of severe hypoglycemia from 5 years before dialysis until 10 years after dialysis. Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine the risk factors of post end stage renal disease (ESRD) one-year hypoglycemia and post ESRD one-year mortality in advanced DKD patients transitioning to dialysis. Results: We found that 11.5% of advanced DKD patients had at least one episode of severe hypoglycemia the year leading up to dialysis initiation. Multivariate analysis revealed hemodialysis compared with peritoneal dialysis, stroke, use of sulfonylurea, glinide, and insulin were associated with higher risk of severe hypoglycemia one year after transitioning to dialysis. Increased frequency of severe hypoglycemia-related hospitalizations was associated with incrementally higher mortality risk one year after transitioning to dialysis (Pre-ESRD hypoglycemia: Hazard ratios: 1.28 (1.18–1.38, p < 0.001), 1.64 (1.49–1.81, p < 0.001) for one, two hypoglycemia-related hospitalizations, respectively; post-ESRD hypoglycemia: HRs of 1.56 (1.40–1.73, p < 0.001), 1.72 (1.39–2.12, p < 0.001) for one, two hypoglycemia-related hospitalizations, respectively (reference group: no hypoglycemia related hospitalization)). Conclusions: Among advanced DKD patients, we observed a progressive elevated risk of hypoglycemia during the critical dialysis transition period. Increased frequency of severe hypoglycemia-related hospitalizations was associated with higher mortality risk one year after transitioning to dialysis. Further study of glycemic management strategies which prevent hypoglycemia during the critical transition period are warranted.

Secular Trends in the Clinical Characteristics of Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Severe Hypoglycemia Between 2008 and 2013

Background

We investigated the trends in the clinical characteristics and prescriptions of type 2 diabetic patients with severe hypoglycemia because the prescription rate of antidiabetic agents has significantly changed recently.

Methods

A total of 193 patients with type 2 diabetes with severe hypoglycemia induced by antidiabetic agents between 2008 and 2013 were divided into three groups based on the period of visit: 2008 - 2009, 2010 - 2011 and 2012 - 2013.

Results

While the proportion of patients with severe hypoglycemia using insulin (from 55% to 74%), biguanides (from 6% to 20%), glinides, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors significantly increased, those using sulfonylureas (from 45% to 20%) significantly decreased. Errors of drug use significantly increased as a trigger of hypoglycemia in recent years. The number of antidiabetic agents (from 1.9 ± 0.6 to 2.3 ± 0.7), non-diabetic agents (from 2.3 ± 2.4 to 4.3 ± 3.3), and total drugs prescribed were significantly higher in recent years among patients receiving insulin therapy.

Conclusions

Polypharmacy especially in patients receiving insulin therapy and errors of drug use have increased in type 2 diabetic patients with severe hypoglycemia in recent years. Intensive education in the usage rule of drugs is considered to be important in order to prevent severe hypoglycemia.

Has the safety of diabetes therapy improved? Lessons from an analysis of diabetic medication-induced severe hypoglycemic cases in an emergency department from 2005 to 2013

Aims

We investigated the incidence and clinical characteristics of diabetic medication-induced severe hypoglycemia (DMISH) in an emergency department (ED) from 2005 to 2013.

Methods

The observation was performed in two separate periods (1 July 2005-31 October 2006 and 1 July 2012-31 October 2013) in the ED of Asahikawa Red Cross Hospital.

Results

The number of DMISH cases (48 during 2005-2006, and 47 during 2012-2013) and their proportions of all emergency visits (0.77 % during 2005-2006, and 0.79 % during 2012-2013) were almost identical for the two periods. Patients' mean age (years) was 69.8 during 2005-2006 and 73.8 during 2012-13. Mean HbA_1c of the patients was 6.72 % during 2012-2013 and 7.27 % during 2005-2006. Plasma glucose level at ED arrival was significantly higher and hospitalization rate of hypoglycemic patients was significantly lower during 2012-2013 than during 2005-2006. Mean sulfonylurea dose, converted to glimepiride, was 3.0 mg during 2005-2006 and 2.3 mg during 2012-2013. The number of patients living alone increased by 63 %, and those living with younger family members decreased by 50 % during 2012-2013 compared with that during 2005-2006.

Conclusions

Although there has been progress in avoiding severe hypoglycemia from 2005 to 2013, the increased number of isolated older diabetic elderly seems to have counteracted clinicians' efforts. A patient-centered approach that sets individualized glycemic targets and selects treatment that balances efficacy and safety is key to avoiding severe hypoglycemia. Improved social support for diabetic elderly patient is also important.

Survey of Hypoglycemia in Elderly People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Japan

Background

The number of elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in Japan is increasing continuously. Hypoglycemia is a significant issue in their treatment. However, the actual situation and related details of their hypoglycemia remain unclear. In order to elucidate them, the Japan Physicians Association conducted a large-scale questionnaire survey for physicians and their outpatients all over Japan.

Methods

Targeted elderly T2DM outpatients were 65 years old or older in 2011. Specialized questionnaire survey forms were distributed to both of physicians and patients. The forms for physicians included questions whether patient had hypoglycemia in the last 1 month or 1 year; those for patients included whether they experienced it in the same durations and any of the 28 symptoms that are suggestive of hypoglycemia or pertaining to geriatric syndrome in the last 1 month, as well as questions about knowledge regarding hypoglycemia. We analyzed associations between hypoglycemia and the symptoms, and between hypoglycemia and medications.

Results

Of 15,892 T2DM patients (age, 74.2 ± 6.3 years; diabetes duration, 12.8 ± 8.9 years; HbA1c, 7.0±1.0%), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) was the most prescribed medication among all oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs). The frequencies of hypoglycemia in the last 1 month recognized by physicians and experienced by patients were 7.8% and 10.4% (P < 0.0001), and in the last 1 year were 15.5% and 21.1% respectively (P < 0.0001). The most common symptom was “weakness, fatigue/feeling languid” and the majority of all patients reported neuroglycopenic or autonomic symptoms. Regarding monotherapy, hypoglycemia was observed in 32.7% of the patients with insulin, 4% in sulfonylurea (SU), 3.8% in glinide, and 3.5% in pioglitazone. The questions asking knowledge about hypoglycemia revealed that SU or insulin users had significantly more knowledge of hypoglycemia than others (P < 0.001); however, 63% of patients using insulin, and 31% of patients using SU always carried glucose or a similar medication with them.

Conclusions

The present study suggested two types of “hidden hypoglycemia”, one is that physicians did not detect and the other one is that patients were not aware. It is vital that physicians strive to prevent hypoglycemia by paying closer attention to symptoms of “hidden hypoglycemia” in their elderly patients.

Pharmacokinetics and clinical use of incretin-based therapies in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes

The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) of stages 3-5 (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <60 mL/min) is about 25-30 % in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). While most oral antidiabetic agents have limitations in patients with CKD, incretin-based therapies are increasingly used for the management of T2DM. This review analyses (1) the influence of CKD on the pharmacokinetics of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists; and (2) the efficacy/safety profile of these agents in clinical practice when prescribed in patients with both T2DM and CKD. Most DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, alogliptin) are predominantly excreted by the kidneys. Thereby, pharmacokinetic studies showed that total exposure to the drug is increased in proportion to the decline of GFR, leading to recommendations for appropriate dose reductions according to the severity of CKD. In these conditions, clinical studies reported a good efficacy and safety profile in patients with CKD. In contrast, linagliptin is eliminated by a predominantly hepatobiliary route. As a pharmacokinetic study showed only minimal influence of decreased GFR on total exposure, no dose adjustment of linagliptin is required in the case of CKD. The experience with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with CKD is more limited. Exenatide is eliminated by renal mechanisms and should not be given in patients with severe CKD. Liraglutide is not eliminated by the kidney, but it should be used with caution because of the limited experience in patients with CKD. Only limited pharmacokinetic data are also available for lixisenatide, exenatide long-acting release (LAR) and other once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists in current development. Several case reports of acute renal failure have been described with GLP-1 receptor agonists, probably triggered by dehydration resulting from gastrointestinal adverse events. However, increasing GLP-1 may also exert favourable renal effects that could contribute to reducing the risk of diabetic nephropathy. In conclusion, the already large reassuring experience with DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with CKD offers new opportunities to the clinician, whereas more caution is required with GLP-1 receptor agonists because of the limited experience in this population.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of canagliflozin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and moderate renal impairment

Background and Objectives

This study examined the effects of moderate renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of canagliflozin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

Japanese patients with stable type 2 diabetes (12 with moderate renal impairment and 12 with normal renal function or mild renal impairment) were eligible. This was an open-label, randomized, two-way crossover, two-sequence, single-dose study performed at a single center in Japan. The subjects were hospitalized for the pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic evaluations. Twenty-four patients received a single dose each of canagliflozin 100 and 200 mg before breakfast in a crossover manner with a 14-day washout between doses. The main outcome measures were pharmacokinetics of canagliflozin and its main metabolites (M5 and M7) in plasma and urine, and change from baseline in 24-h urinary glucose excretion (ΔUGE24 h).

Results

There was no significant effect of moderate renal impairment on the maximum canagliflozin concentration. The ratios of least square means (90 % confidence intervals [CIs]) of moderate renal impairment relative to normal renal function or mild renal impairment were 0.982 (0.821–1.173) and 0.989 (0.827–1.182) for the 100 and 200 mg doses, respectively. The canagliflozin area under the plasma concentration–time curve was greater in those with moderate renal impairment than in those without, after both canagliflozin doses (ratio of least square means [90 % CI] 1.258 [1.061–1.490] and 1.216 [1.026–1.441]). ΔUGE24 h increased after administration of both doses, but in patients with moderate renal impairment, the increase was approximately 70 % of that in patients with normal renal function or mild renal impairment. The incidence of adverse events was low and no patient developed hypoglycemia.

Conclusion

The pharmacokinetics of canagliflozin are affected by renal function, with slight decreases in renal clearance observed. No effect of renal impairment on the maximum concentration was observed. Renal impairment reduced the ability of canagliflozin to promote urinary glucose excretion.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40261-014-0226-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia and glycaemic disarrays

In patients with diabetes receiving chronic haemodialysis, both very high and low glucose levels are associated with poor outcomes, including mortality. Conditions that are associated with an increased risk of hypoglycaemia in these patients include decreased gluconeogenesis in the remnant kidneys, deranged metabolic pathways, inadequate nutrition, decreased insulin clearance, glucose loss to the dialysate and diffusion of glucose into erythrocytes during haemodialysis. Haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia is common during treatments with glucose-free dialysate, which engenders a catabolic status similar to fasting; this state can also occur with 5.55 mmol/l glucose-containing dialysate. Haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia occurs more frequently in patients with diabetes than in those without. Insulin therapy and oral hypoglycaemic agents should, therefore, be used with caution in patients on dialysis. Several hours after completion of haemodialysis treatment a paradoxical rebound hyperglycaemia may occur via a similar mechanism as the Somogyi effect, together with insulin resistance. Appropriate glycaemic control tailored for patients on haemodialysis is needed to avoid haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia and other glycaemic disarrays. In this Review we summarize the pathophysiology and current management of glycaemic disarrays in patients on haemodialysis.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the SGLT2 Inhibitor Remogliflozin Etabonate in Subjects with Mild and Moderate Renal Impairment

Remogliflozin etabonate (RE), the prodrug of remogliflozin, is an inhibitor of the sodium glucose-dependent renal transporter 2 (SGLT2), enabling urinary glucose excretion to reduce hyperglycemia for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Renal function declines more rapidly in patients with type 2 diabetes, making it difficult or unsafe to continue on some antidiabetic therapeutics. In an initial effort to understand the potential utility of RE in patients with renal impairment, the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of RE were evaluated in a single oral dose (250 mg) in patients with renal impairment as compared with control subjects. As shown by pharmacodynamic measurements of urinary glucose excretion, there was no clinically significant reduction in the ability of remogliflozin to inhibit SGLT2. In addition, there were no significant changes in area under the curve (from 0 to infinity) or half-life of remogliflozin, suggesting renal impairment does not alter the pharmacokinetics of remogliflozin. In contrast to other SGLT2 inhibitors which accumulate in patients with renal impairment, adjustment of the dosage of RE in subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment is not indicated based on the observations in this study.

Comparison of the antidiabetic effects of linagliptin among groups with a normal renal function and a mild or severe renal impairment - retrospective observation study of Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

The clinical course > 6 months after the initiation of linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes was compared among the groups divided by their renal function.

METHODS

Two hundred and sixteen Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with 5 mg once daily linagliptin were studied as the treated set. One hundred and forty-five subjects whose medications were not changed during the observation period were investigated as the full analysis set to assess the effectiveness. The subjects were divided into three groups based on an eGFR: eGFR ≥ 60, 59 - 45 and < 45 ml/min/1.73 m(2). The parameters were analyzed separately in the patients receiving monotherapy and additional therapy of linagliptin.

RESULTS

The HbA1c (NGSP) levels significantly improved in both the patients receiving monotherapy and additional therapy. The changes in the HbA1c levels at 6 months were not significantly different between the groups with an eGFR ≥ 60, 59 - 45 and < 45 ml/min/1.73 m(2) receiving monotherapy (-1.0, -0.8 and -0.8%, respectively). Similarly, those were not significantly different between the different groups receiving additional therapy (-0.6, -0.5 and -0.7%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Linagliptin is considered to be effective for patients with type 2 diabetes and renal impairment in the present analysis performed at our institution.

Diabetes treatment in patients with renal disease: Is the landscape clear enough?

Diabetes is the most important risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD). The risk of CKD attributable to diabetes continues to rise worldwide. Diabetic patients with CKD need complicated treatment for their metabolic disorders as well as for related comorbidities. They have to treat, often intensively, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, bone disease, anaemia, and frequently established cardiovascular disease. The treatment of hypoglycaemia in diabetic persons with CKD must tie their individual goals of glycaemia (usually less tight glycaemic control) and knowledge on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs available to a person with kidney disease. The problem is complicated from the fact that in many efficacy studies patients with CKD are excluded so data of safety and efficacy for these patients are missing. This results in fear of use by lack of evidence. Metformin is globally accepted as the first choice in practically all therapeutic algorithms for diabetic subjects. The advantages of metformin are low risk of hypoglycaemia, modest weight loss, effectiveness and low cost. Data of UKPDS indicate that treatment based on metformin results in less total as well cardiovascular mortality. Metformin remains the drug of choice for patients with diabetes and CKD provided that their estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) remains above 30 mL/min per square meter. For diabetic patients with eGFR between 30-60 mL/min per square meter more frequent monitoring of renal function and dose reduction of metformin is needed. The use of sulfonylureas, glinides and insulin carry a higher risk of hypoglycemia in these patients and must be very careful. Lower doses and slower titration of the dose is needed. Is better to avoid sulfonylureas with active hepatic metabolites, which are renally excreted. Very useful drugs for this group of patients emerge dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors. These drugs do not cause hypoglycemia and most of them (linagliptin is an exception) require dose reduction in various stages of renal disease.

Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin as add-on therapy in type 2 diabetes

Combination therapy for type 2 diabetes using agents with complementary mechanisms of action may improve glycemic control to a greater extent than monotherapy and allow the use of lower doses of antihyperglycemic medications. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, including saxagliptin, are recommended as add-on therapy to metformin and as part of two- or three-drug combinations in patients not meeting individualized glycemic goals with metformin alone or as part of a dual-therapy regimen. This article reviews the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin as an add-on therapy to metformin, glyburide, a thiazolidinedione, or insulin (with or without metformin) and as a component of triple therapy with metformin and a sulfonylurea.

Metformin therapy and kidney disease: a review of guidelines and proposals for metformin withdrawal around the world

OBJECTIVE

We compared and contrasted guidelines on metformin treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) around the world, with the aim of helping physicians to refine their analysis of the available evidence before deciding whether to continue or withdraw this drug.

METHODS

We performed a systematic research for metformin contraindications in: (i) official documents from the world's 20 most populated countries and the 20 most scientifically productive countries in the field of diabetology and (ii) publications referenced in electronic databases from 1990 onwards.

RESULTS

We identified three international guidelines, 31 national guidelines, and 20 proposals in the scientific literature. The criteria for metformin withdrawal were (i) mainly qualitative in the most populated countries; (ii) mainly quantitative in the most scientifically productive countries (with, in all cases, a suggested threshold for withdrawing metformin); and (iii) quantitative in all, but one of the literature proposals, with a threshold for withdrawal in most cases (n = 17) and/or adjustment of the metformin dose as a function of renal status (n = 8). There was a good degree of consensus on serum creatinine thresholds; whereas guidelines based on estimated glomerular filtration rate thresholds varied from 60 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) up to stage 5 CKD. Only one of the proposals has been tested in a prospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, proposals for continuing or stopping metformin therapy in CKD involve a threshold (whether based on serum creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate) rather than the dose adjustment as a function of renal status (in stable patients) performed for other drugs excreted by the kidney.

Achieving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes and renal impairment

Defining optimal regimens for the management of diabetes among patients with renal impairment is often clinically challenging, and guidance on the optimal management of these patients in clinical practice can vary considerably. Moreover, as many anti-diabetes agents are predominantly excreted renally, treatment options to control blood glucose levels are limited for patients with type 2 diabetes and concomitant chronic kidney disease. Many of the widely used and more established anti-diabetes drugs cannot be used in this population either or must be down-titrated to reduce the increased risk of severe hypoglycemic episodes. A number of more recently available anti-diabetes drugs are indicated for use in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Newer drugs that may improve the currently very limited treatment options for patients with type 2 diabetes and renal impairment include the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. This review paper, based on a literature search for both original and review articles (Medline), relevant clinical practice/regulatory guidelines and integrating our own knowledge of the field, provides an up-to-date examination of the current treatment options available. However, further studies with larger populations of patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease are needed to clarify the efficacy and safety of the different treatment options, including newer drugs.

Pharmacokinetic considerations for the treatment of diabetes in patients with chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) of stages 3 - 5 (creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min) represent ≈ 25% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but the problem is underrecognized or neglected in clinical practice. However, most oral antidiabetic agents have limitations in case of renal impairment (RI), either because they require a dose adjustment or because they are contraindicated for safety reasons.

AREAS COVERED

The author performed an extensive literature search to analyze the influence of RI on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of glucose-lowering agents and the potential consequences for clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

As a result of PK interferences and for safety reasons, the daily dose should be reduced according to glomerular filtration rate (GFR) or even the drug is contraindicated in presence of severe CKD. This is the case for metformin (risk of lactic acidosis) and for many sulfonylureas (risk of hypoglycemia). At present, however, the exact GFR cutoff for metformin use is controversial. New antidiabetic agents are better tolerated in case of CKD, although clinical experience remains quite limited for most of them. The dose of DPP-4 inhibitors should be reduced (except for linagliptin), whereas both the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors are questionable in presence of CKD.

Persistence of initial oral antidiabetic treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Background

Adequate persistence of oral antidiabetic treatment is highly important to achieve proper glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the persistence of initial treatment with metformin and/or sulphonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Material/Methods

The study was performed among diabetic patients (n=256,384) who were with newly prescribed oral antidiabetic drugs (metformin and/or sulphonylureas) between 2007 and 2009. For making comparison, patients with newly prescribed statin or clopidogrel therapy (with and without percutaneous coronary intervention) were investigated. The database of the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund Administration was used.

Results

The 1-year persistence of initial treatment with metformin, sulphonylureas or metformin/sulphonylurea combination was 47.7%, 45.4% and 55.8%, respectively, which was significantly better than the persistence of statin therapy (26.3%) but worse than that of clopidogrel therapy in patients undergoing coronary intervention (73.2%). Within the sulphonylurea group there was a tendency of better persistence of treatment with the “modified-release” tablets at 12 months compared to the conventional sulphonylureas (47.8 vs. 42.2%). The persistence of therapy using metformin 1000 mg – 60 tablets was significantly better (60.4%) at 12 months than that of other forms of metformin therapy with lower doses and smaller boxes (with fewer tablets) analyzed together (47.7%).

Conclusions

The persistence of initial treatment with metformin and/or sulphonylureas is far from optimal. Better diabetic care and continuous patient education should be encouraged to achieve higher persistence of oral antidiabetic treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Incretin-based therapies in complex patients: practical implications and opportunities for maximizing clinical outcomes: a discussion with Dr. Vivian A. Fonseca

Elderly patients and patients with renal impairment present unique challenges in the management of diabetes mellitus. Impaired renal function is a common comorbidity (or complication) associated with type 2 diabetes, as well as a complicating factor in the treatment of the disease. Renal insufficiency, which can result in elevated plasma concentrations of pharmaceutical agents, may preclude the use of some antihyperglycemic medications and require that the dosages of others be reduced. Failure to select and dose medications carefully in these patients may increase the risk of hypoglycemia and other adverse effects. For example, elevated plasma concentrations of some sulfonylureas may increase the risk of hypoglycemia. Because patients with chronic renal insufficiency tend to retain fluids, treatment with a thiazolidinedione--a class of agents associated with fluid retention--may exacerbate the risk of edema. Older patients with type 2 diabetes--like patients with renal insufficiency an important and populous subgroup--also have issues with therapy selection and dosing regimens. As a result of the effects of aging on kidney function, older patients may also be subject to elevated plasma levels with consequent additional risk of hypoglycemia and other adverse events. Because older patients tend to be treated with multiple medications for multiple comorbidities, it becomes challenging to design regimens that avoid or reduce the risk of drug-drug interactions. For both older patients and patients with chronic renal insufficiency, the most important drug-related adverse effect to avoid is hypoglycemia. Accordingly, incretin-based agents have an advantage because they are unlikely to cause hypoglycemia.

Characteristics of patients with sulphonurea-induced hypoglycemia

BACKGROUND/AIM

Sulphonylurea (SU) agents continue to be a cornerstone of the therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Hypoglycemia is the most dangerous side effect of SU. Identifying the characteristics of patients with SU-induced hypoglycemia (SUIH) may help in reducing its frequency.

METHODS

All consecutive admissions of patients with SUIH, between 2000 and 2008, were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 4702 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were admitted to the department of medicine. Of these, 155 patients were admitted because of SUIH. Most of these patients were elderly, had multiple comorbid situations, and were taking multiple medications. Almost a third of the patients had a history of recent changes in the use of their medications. Various infectious complications (urinary, lung, skin, and peritoneal) occurred in 43% of patients. Renal failure was a frequent finding at admission (44% of patients had creatinine plasma levels > 120 μmol/L). Poor oral intake before admission was reported by 31% of patients. Markers of malnutrition (low serum levels of albumin, iron, vitamin B-12, and folic acid) were frequently found in most patients. Mean hemoglobin A1C levels were in the low abnormal levels. A major vascular event during hospitalization co-occurred in 11% of patients. Three patients died during the hospital admission for SUIH.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly fragile patients with multiple comorbid situations including renal failure and tight glycemic control are prone to develop SUIH. Sulphonylurea agents should be avoided in such patients. An episode of SUIH should be considered as an alarming prognostic marker.