Comparison of the Watson formula and bioimpedance spectroscopy for measuring body volume and calculating kt/V in patients with peritoneal dialysis

CONCLUSION

There were significant differences between Vwat and Vbis and between Kt/Vwat and Kt/Vbis. Kt/Vwat may underestimate small-solute dialysis adequacy in most cases. Kt/Vbis instead of Kt/Vwat could be accounted for in creating individualized dialysis prescriptions if the patient has no obvious clinical symptoms.

Gut Microbiome Is Related to Cognitive Impairment in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Gut microbiota disturbances may influence cognitive function, increasing uremic toxins and inflammation in dialysis patients; therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association of the gut microbiota profile with cognitive impairment (CI) in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD). In a cross-sectional study, cognitive function was evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in 39 APD patients and classified as normal cognitive function and CI. The gut microbiota was analyzed using the 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach. All patients had clinical, biochemical and urea clearance evaluations. Eighty-two percent of patients were men, with a mean age of 47 ± 24 years and 11 (7-48) months on PD therapy; 64% had mild CI. Patients with CI were older (53 ± 16 vs. 38 ± 14, p = 0.006) and had a higher frequency of diabetes mellitus (56% vs. 21%, p = 0.04) and constipation (7% vs. 48%, p = 0.04) and lower creatinine concentrations (11.3 ± 3.7 vs. 14.9 ± 5.4, p = 0.02) compared to normal cognitive function patients. Patients with CI showed a preponderance of S24_7, Rikenellaceae, Odoribacteraceae, Odoribacter and Anaerotruncus, while patients without CI had a greater abundance of Dorea, Ruminococcus, Sutterella and Fusobacteria (LDA score (Log10) > 2.5; p < 0.05). After glucose and age adjustment, Odoribacter was still associated with CI. In conclusion, patients with CI had a different gut microbiota characterized by the higher abundance of indole-producing and mucin-fermenting bacteria compared to normal cognitive function patients.

Residual Kidney Function in Hemodialysis: Its Importance and Contribution to Improved Patient Outcomes

Individuals afflicted with advanced kidney dysfunction who require dialysis for medical management exhibit different degrees of native kidney function, called residual kidney function (RKF), ranging from nil to appreciable levels. The primary focus of this manuscript is to delve into the concept of RKF, a pivotal yet under-represented topic in nephrology. To begin, we unpack the definition and intrinsic nature of RKF. We then juxtapose the efficiency of RKF against that of hemodialysis in preserving homeostatic equilibrium and facilitating physiological functions. Given the complex interplay of RKF and overall patient health, we shed light on the extent of its influence on patient outcomes, particularly in those living with advanced kidney dysfunction and on dialysis. This manuscript subsequently presents methodologies and measures to assess RKF, concluding with the potential benefits of targeted interventions aimed at preserving RKF.

The Relationship Between Serum Folate Level and Residual Renal Function in CAPD Patients

Objective

To investigate the relationship between serum folate (FA) levels and residual renal function (RRF) in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients.

Methods

Clinical data were collected from 180 hospitalized patients who received CAPD regularly. Patients were divided into the FA deficiency group and the FA non-deficiency group according to serum FA level. Data on age, sex, PD vintage, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, serum FA, total Kt/V, residual kidney Kt/V, peritoneum Kt/V, creatinine clearance (Ccr), ultrafiltration volume, cystatin C (cytC), serum creatinine (Scr), urea nitrogen, retinol-binding protein and the primary disease were gathered from 2 groups. Statistical methods were used to analyze the relationship between serum FA level and RRF.

Results

Peritoneal Kt/V, cytC, Scr were higher, and residual kidney Kt/V was lower in FA deficiency group than in non-deficiency group. Univariate correlation showed the peritoneal Kt/V, cytC, Scr negatively correlated with serum FA while residual kidney Kt/V positively correlated with serum FA, and there was a simple linear regression relationship between serum FA and residual kidney Kt/V. Differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

There is a relationship between serum FA and RRF in CAPD patients. Prospective studies or trials should be performed to clarify the importance of FA supplementation on RRF during peritoneal dialysis.

Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in automated peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Cognitive deterioration decreases quality of life, self-care and adherence to treatment, increasing mortality risk. There is scarce information of cognitive impairment in peritoneal dialysis, and data are controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency and associated factors of cognitive impairment in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD).

METHODS

Cross-sectional study; 71 patients on APD underwent clinical, biochemical and cognitive function evaluation by means of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Cognitive function was also evaluated in healthy controls.

RESULTS

Mean age was 42 ± 16 years, 79% were men and dialysis vintage was 17 (7-32) months. In APD patients, cognitive impairment was present in 7% (mild deterioration) and 68% according to the MMSE and MoCA, respectively, and in 4% and 37% in the healthy controls. Patients with cognitive impairment (according to MoCA) were older, with lower educational degree, had more frequently diabetes, and higher serum glucose, as well as lower serum creatinine, phosphorus and sodium concentrations than patients with normal cognitive function. In multiple linear regression analysis, predictors for the MoCA score (R2 0.63, p = 0.002) were schooling [B = 0.54 (0.20 to 0.89), p = 0.003], age [B=-0.11 (-0.21 to -0.01), p = 0.04], serum sodium [B = 0.58 (0.05 to 1.11), p = 0.03] and creatinine concentrations [B = 3.9 (0.03 to 0.83), p = 0.03].

CONCLUSION

In this sample of APD patients with mean age in the early 40 s, the prevalence of cognitive impairment by MoCA test was 65%, and it was associated to older age, lower educational level and lower serum concentrations of sodium and creatinine.

Serum β2-microglobulin as a predictor of residual kidney function in peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

While clinical guidelines recommend that residual kidney function (RKF) is measured in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, 24-h urine collection is cumbersome and prone to errors. We wished to determine whether an equation using serum β2-microglobulin (β2M) could prove of clinical benefit in estimating RKF and identifying patients who could start PD with incremental prescriptions.

METHODS

We measured serum β2M in consecutive PD outpatients recently starting dialysis with continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) or automated PD (APD), attending a single tertiary hospital for their routine clinical visit. RKF was defined as the mean of 24-h urine clearances of creatinine and urea. An equation estimating RKF (eRKF) was generated based on serum β2M levels on a randomly selected modelling group.

RESULTS

We included 511 patients, of whom 351 in the modelling group and 150 in the validation group. Mean age was 58.7 ± 15.8, 307 (60.0%) were men and median RKF value was 4.5 (2.4-6.5) mL/min/1.73 m2. In the validation group, an equation based on β2M, creatinine, urea, age and gender showed minimal bias of - 0.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 to estimate RKF. Area under the receiving operator characteristic curve was 0.915 to detect RKF ≥ 2 mL/min/1.73 m2.

CONCLUSION

An equation based on serum β2M concentration would not be able to replace 24-h urine collection as the standard of care when an exact measurement of RKF is required. However, it could prove useful in identifying patients suitable for an incremental PD prescription and for monitoring RKF in individuals unable to reliably collect urine.

Relationship between serum cystatin C and prognosis of nondiabetic peritoneal dialysis patients

We investigated whether serum cystatin C predicted treatment failure and mortality in nondiabetic peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. We studied 163 new-onset, nondiabetic PD patients between January 2010 and January 2019. Patients were followed up until death or 1 July 2019. Serum cystatin C was measured within 1 week before PD. Basic demographic and laboratory test data were collected. Patients were divided into low (<5.54 mg/L) and high (≥5.54 mg/L) serum cystatin C groups. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test showed that the technical survival rate of the low cystatin C group was higher than that of the high cystatin C group. There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups. Multivariate Cox model showed that serum cystatin C was an independent risk factor for PD failure. Serum cystatin C could predict PD failure but was not associated with mortality in nondiabetic PD patients.

Does Cystatin C have a role as metabolic surrogate in peritoneal dialysis beyond its association with residual renal function?

Introduction:

It has been suggested that cystatin C levels are modified by obesity and inflammation. Furthermore, cystatin C has been associated with cardiovascular events and mortality outcomes.

Aim:

To study the association of cystatin C with the metabolic profile and cardiovascular disease of peritoneal dialysis patients.

Methods:

Data collected included clinical, laboratorial, and multifrequency bioimpedance assessment of 52 stable peritoneal dialysis patients. Minimal residual renal function was defined as > 2mL/min/1.73m².

Results:

Serum cystatin C was not significantly associated with peritoneal or urinary cystatin C excretion. Negative correlation of cystatin C with normalized protein catabolic rate (rho -0.33, p = 0.02) and a trend towards positive correlation with relative body fat (rho 0.27, p = 0.05) were not independent from residual renal function. Cystatin C was not significantly associated with cardiovascular disease (p = 0.28), nor with glycated hemoglobin (p = 0.19) or c-reactive protein (p = 0.56). In the multivariate model, both age and diabetes were the strongest predictors of cardiovascular disease (odds ratio 1.09, p = 0.029 and odds ratio 29.95, p = 0.016, respectively), while relative body fat was negatively associated with cardiovascular disease (p = 0.038); neither cystatin C (p = 0.096) nor minimal residual renal function (p = 0.756) reached a significant association with cardiovascular disease.

Conclusions:

In this group of peritoneal dialysis patients, cystatin C did not correlate with the metabolic or inflammatory status, nor cardiovascular disease, after adjustment for residual renal function.

Evaluation of cystatin C-derived glomerular filtration rate equations in Chinese population

ABTRACTGlomerular filtration rate (GFR) has become the best indicator for assessing renal function. This study aims to validate the existing cystatin C (CysC)-derived estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations in Chinese patients to explore whether the reported CysC-derived eGFR formulas could be applied to the Chinese population. This study validated the equations in a population totaling 1816 inpatients. We calculated eGFR by different CysC-derived equations, then compared with the mGFR. Equation performance was assessed by bias (mean difference between mGFR and eGFR), precision (inter-quartile range of difference) and accuracy (mainly, accuracy within 30% [P₃₀]). All equations expressed poor performance in dialysis patients (n = 345), and the performance for non-dialysis patients (n = 1471) were significantly greater than that in dialysis patients. Feng and Pei equations had higher P₃₀ (50.82% and 49.73%, respectively) than the widely used CKD-EPI_CysC (41.10%) and MacIsaac equations (48.23%), and the distribution of eGFR values is more similar to the distribution of mGFR in non-dialysis patients. Similar trends showed in mGFR, sex, age, and BMI subgroups. However, no equation met the guideline standard of P₃₀ ≥ 75%. Our results suggest that the published CysC-based eGFR equations are not suitable for dialysis patients, and the accuracy of equations for non-dialysis patients significantly better than the dialysis ones. Moreover, Feng and Pei equation showed better performance in non-dialysis patients.

How best to estimate glomerular filtration rate? Novel filtration markers and their application

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic kidney disease is an increasing health burden. Estimating equations using serum concentrations of creatinine and cystatin C facilitate the assessment of kidney function as reflected in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Reduced eGFR is associated with increased risk for numerous adverse outcomes and is an important aspect in many clinical situations. However, current equations are suboptimal in some clinical settings. The review focuses on approaches to improve the estimation of GFR and aims to familiarize the reader with the underlying methodological hypotheses how new markers could contribute to improve the overall performance of estimating equations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Low molecular weight proteins such as β-trace-protein and β-2-microglobulin, as well as newly discovered metabolites, show promise as new filtration markers, as they might be beneficial in populations in which creatinine or cystatin C are inaccurate. We propose that the combination of multiple novel markers, alone or in combination with creatinine, cystatin C or demographics, can potentially improve GFR estimation. For special populations such as dialysis patients, separate equations have been developed to estimate residual kidney function.

SUMMARY

Current GFR estimating equations are an essential part of routine clinical practice but have limitations. The use of multiple markers combined in a single equation appears to be the most promising approach. Future research is required to validate proposed equations in diverse populations.

Development and Validation of Residual Kidney Function Estimating Equations in Dialysis Patients

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Measurement of residual kidney function is recommended for the adjustment of the dialysis prescription, but timed urine collections are difficult and prone to errors. Equations to calculate residual kidney function from serum concentrations of endogenous filtration markers and demographic parameters would simplify monitoring of residual kidney function. However, few equations to estimate residual kidney function using serum concentrations of small solutes and low-molecular-weight proteins have been developed and externally validated.

STUDY DESIGN

Study of diagnostic test accuracy.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

823 Chinese peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients (development cohort) and 826 PD and hemodialysis patients from the Netherlands NECOSAD study (validation cohort).

TESTS COMPARED

Equations to estimate residual kidney function (estimated clearance [eCl]) using serum creatinine, urea nitrogen, cystatin C, β2-microglobulin (B2M), β-trace protein (BTP), and combinations, as well as demographic variables (age, sex, height, and weight). Equations were developed using multivariable linear regression analysis in the development cohort and then tested in the validation cohort. Equations were compared with published validated equations.

OUTCOMES

Residual kidney function measured as urinary clearance (mCl) of urea nitrogen (mClUN) and average of creatinine and urea nitrogen clearance (mClUN-cr).

RESULTS

In external validation, bias (difference between mCl and eCl) was within ± 1.0 unit for all equations. Accuracy (percent of differences within ± 2.0 units) was significantly better for eClBTP, eClB2M, and eClBTP-B2M than eClUN-cr for both mClUN (78%, 80%, and 81% vs 72%; P < 0.05 for all) and mClUN-cr (72%, 78%, and 79% vs 68%; P < 0.05 for all). The area under the curve for predicting mClUN > 2.0 mL/min was highest for eClB2M (0.853) and eClBTP-B2M (0.848). Results were similar for other validated equations.

LIMITATIONS

Development cohort only consisted of PD patients, no gold-standard method for residual kidney function measurement.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm the validity and extend the generalizability of residual kidney function estimating equations from serum concentrations of low-molecular-weight proteins without urine collection.

Utility of cystatin C-based equations in patients undergoing dialysis

Serum cystatin C (CysC) measurement is regarded as a simple and practical alternative to measure residual renal function for dialysis patients. Recent studies have shown that CysC has better diagnostic accuracy or at least equivalence to creatinine in predicting the early stages of renal damage, and is closely related to clinical outcomes of dialysis patients. Thus, the applicability of CysC-derived equations in patients undergoing dialysis should be paid attention. Here, we review the role of CysC in diagnosis, renal function evaluation, and prognosis outcomes for dialysis patients, so as to provide them with useful suggestions on evaluating renal function and predicting adverse outcomes in clinical practice.

Validation of cystatin C-based equations for evaluating residual renal function in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Background

Residual renal function needs to be assessed frequently in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). A commonly used method is to measure creatinine (Cr) and urea clearance in urine collected over 24 h, but collection can be cumbersome and difficult to manage. A faster, simpler alternative is to measure levels of cystatin C (CysC) in serum, but the accuracy and reliability of this method is controversial. Our study aims to validate published CysC-based equations for estimating residual renal function in patients on CAPD.

Methods

Residual renal function was measured by calculating average clearance of urea and Cr in 24-h urine as well as by applying CysC- or Cr-based equations published by Hoek and Yang. We then compared the performance of the equations against the 24-h urine results.

Results

In our sample of 255 patients ages 47.9 ± 15.6 years, the serum CysC level was 6.43 ± 1.13 mg/L. Serum CysC level was not significantly associated with age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, hemoglobin, intact parathyroid hormone, normalized protein catabolic rate or the presence of diabetes. In contrast, serum CysC levels did correlate with peritoneal clearance of CysC and with levels of prealbumin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Residual renal function was 2.56 ± 2.07 mL/min/1.73 m 2 based on 24-h urine sampling, compared with estimates (mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) of 2.98 ± 0.66 for Hoek's equation, 2.03 ± 0.97 for Yang's CysC-based equation and 2.70 ± 1.30 for Yang's Cr-based equation. Accuracies within 30%/50% of measured residual renal function for the three equations were 29.02/48.24, 34.90/56.86 and 31.37/54.90.

Conclusion

The three equations for estimating residual renal function showed similar limits of agreement and differed significantly from the measured value. Published CysC-based equations do not appear to be particularly reliable for patients on CAPD. Further development and validation of CysC-based equations should take into account peritoneal clearance of CysC and other relevant factors.

Measurement and Estimation of Residual Kidney Function in Patients on Dialysis

Residual kidney function (RKF) in patients on dialysis is strongly associated with survival and better quality of life. Assessment of kidney function underlies the management of patients with chronic kidney disease before dialysis initiation. However, methods to assess RKF after dialysis initiation are just now being refined. In this review, we discuss the definition of RKF and methods for measurement and estimation of RKF, highlighting the unique aspects of dialysis that impact these assessments.

Estimating residual kidney function in dialysis patients without urine collection

Residual kidney function contributes substantially to solute clearance in dialysis patients but cannot be assessed without urine collection. We used serum filtration markers to develop dialysis-specific equations to estimate urinary urea clearance without the need for urine collection. In our development cohort, we measured 24-hour urine clearances under close supervision in 44 patients and validated these equations in 826 patients from the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis. For the development and validation cohorts, median urinary urea clearance was 2.6 and 2.4 ml/min, respectively. During the 24-hour visit in the development cohort, serum β-trace protein concentrations remained in steady state but concentrations of all other markers increased. In the validation cohort, bias (median measured minus estimated clearance) was low for all equations. Precision was significantly better for β-trace protein and β2-microglobulin equations and the accuracy was significantly greater for β-trace protein, β2-microglobulin, and cystatin C equations, compared with the urea plus creatinine equation. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for detecting measured urinary urea clearance by equation-estimated urinary urea clearance (both 2 ml/min or more) were 0.821, 0.850, and 0.796 for β-trace protein, β2-microglobulin, and cystatin C equations, respectively; significantly greater than the 0.663 for the urea plus creatinine equation. Thus, residual renal function can be estimated in dialysis patients without urine collections.

Diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidneys and its relationship with residual renal function in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to prospectively evaluate renal diffusion as shown by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and its relationship with the residual renal function (RRF) in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Forty CAPD patients and 40 healthy volunteers were recruited, and all underwent conventional and fat-saturated echo-planar DWI with three b values (0, 300, 600 s/mm(2)). The renal parenchymal thickness and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were measured, and both were compared between the two groups. The relationships between ADC values and clinical indexes--which included RRF, serum creatinine value, cystatin C value, and urine output--were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with the renal parenchymal thickness and ADC values in control subjects, these values in CAPD patients were significantly decreased (p < 0.0001). In CAPD patients, the ADC values were positively correlated with RRF (r = 0.447, p = 0.004). A mild linear correlation was also found between the ADC values and cystatin C value (r = -0.352, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

The renal diffusion function as shown by DWI is impaired in CAPD patients and correlates with RRF.

Management of a rapidly growing peritoneal dialysis population at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

Managing a rapidly growing peritoneal dialysis program with more than 1000 patients involves multiple challenges, labor constraints, logistics, and excessive geographic distance. This paper describes how Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China, manages those issues, while simultaneously improving quality of the care and, subsequently, clinical outcomes.

Accuracy of different equations in estimating GFR in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The knowledge of renal function is crucial for the management of pediatric kidney transplant recipients. In this population, the most commonly used plasma creatinine (PCr)-based or cystatin C (CystC)-based GFR-predicting formulas may underperform (e.g., corticosteroids and trimethoprim may affect PCr concentration, whereas prednisone and calcineurin inhibitors may affect CystC concentration). This study evaluated the performance of six formulas in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

The study used PCr-based formulas (bedside Schwartz, Schwartz-Lyon), CystC-based formulas (Hoek, Filler), and combined PCr-CystC-based formulas (CKD in Children [CKiD] 2012 and Zappitelli). The performance of these formulas was compared using inulin clearance as reference and assessed according to CKD stages in a historical cohort that included 73 pediatric kidney transplant recipients (199 measurements). The ability of the formulas to identify GFRs<60, <75, and <90 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) was assessed.

RESULTS

At measured GFR (mGFR) ≥90 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (nine patients; 23 measurements), the Zappitelli formula had the highest 30% accuracy (P30) (95% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 87% to 100%]) and the bedside Schwartz had the highest 10% accuracy (P10) (56% [95% CI, 32% to 72%]). At mGFR≥60 and <90 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (22 patients; 91 measurements), all formulas had P30 values >80%. However, only the CKiD 2012 formula had a P10 value >50%. At mGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (42 patients; 85 measurements), the CKiD 2012 and Schwartz-Lyon formulas had the highest P10 (45% [95% CI, 34% to 55%] and 43% [95% CI, 33% to 54%]) and P30 (90% [95% CI, 84% to 97%] and 91% [95% CI, 86% to 98%]). All studied equations except Hoek and Filler had areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves significantly >90% in discriminating patients with renal dysfunction at various CKD stages (GFR<60, <75, and <90 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)).

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric kidney transplant recipients, the CKiD 2012 formula had the best performance at mGFRs<90 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). CystC-based formulas were not superior to PCr-based formulas.

C-terminal agrin fragment (CAF) as a serum biomarker for residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

C-terminal agrin fragment (CAF, size 22 kDa) is a promising new biomarker for kidney function. This study evaluated the usefulness of CAF as a serum biomarker for residual renal function (RRF) in patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis (APD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Serum, urine and dialysate samples were obtained in 12 end-stage renal disease patients undergoing APD. Total, renal and peritoneal clearances were calculated for CAF, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and cystatin c. kt/V was computed, and RRF (in ml/min) was calculated as the arithmetic mean of creatinine and BUN clearance. Correlations between the biomarkers' serum concentrations, clearances, kt/V and RRF were computed.

RESULTS

Serum CAF concentrations were highly correlated with serum concentrations of creatinine (r = 0.806, p = 0.002), BUN (r = 0.727, p = 0.007), cystatin c (r = 0.839, p = 0.001) and inversely to 24-h urinary output (r = -0.669, p = 0.017). RRF was inversely correlated with serum concentrations of CAF, cystatin c and creatinine being highest for CAF (r = -0.734, p = 0.007) followed by cystatin c (r = -0.65, p = 0.022) and creatinine (r = -0.606, p = 0.037). Serum BUN was not significantly associated with RRF (r = -0.497, p = 0.101). Age, weight and gender did not significantly affect serum CAF concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Serum CAF provides a robust serum biomarker for RRF in peritoneal dialysis patients undergoing APD, possibly outperforming the value of conventional biomarkers.

Serum Cystatin C Does Not Predict Mortality or Treatment Failure in Peritoneal Dialysis: A Prospective Study

♦

BACKGROUND

Small solute clearance, especially that derived from residual renal function (RRF), is an independent risk factor for death in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Assessment of solute clearance is time-consuming and prone to multiple errors. Cystatin C is a small protein which has been used as a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) marker. We investigated whether serum cystatin C concentrations are related to mortality in patients receiving PD. ♦

METHODS

New and prevalent PD patients (n = 235) underwent assessment of Kt/Vurea, RRF, weekly creatinine clearance (CCr), normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) and a peritoneal equilibration test (PET) at intervals. Blood was collected simultaneously for cystatin C measurement. Patients were followed for a median of 1,429 days (range 12 to 2,964 days) until death or study closure. Cause of death was recorded where given. Cox regression was performed to determine whether cystatin C had prognostic value either independently or with adjustment for other factors (age, sex, dialysis modality, diabetic status, cardiovascular comorbidity, Kt/V, CCr, RRF, nPCR or 4 h dialysate to plasma creatinine ratio (4 h D/Pcr) during the PET). The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and treatment failure. ♦

RESULTS

There were 93 deaths. Increasing age and 4 h D/Pcr ratio, decreased RRF and presence of diabetes were significantly [p < 0.05] negatively associated with survival and treatment failure. Serum cystatin C was not related to either outcome. ♦

CONCLUSIONS

Serum cystatin C concentration does not predict mortality or treatment failure in patients receiving PD.

Removal and rebound kinetics of cystatin C in high-flux hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cystatin C is a 13.3 kD middle molecule of similar size to β2-microglobulin and a marker of GFR in CKD. This study aimed to determine cystatin C kinetics in hemodialysis to understand whether blood concentrations may predict residual renal function and middle-molecule clearance.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Cystatin C removal and rebound kinetics were studied in 24 patients on high-flux hemodialysis or hemodiafiltration. To determine whether cystatin C concentrations are predictable, an iterative two-pool mathematical model was applied.

RESULTS

Cystatin C was cleared effectively, although less than β2-microglobulin (reduction ratios ± SD are 39% ± 11 and 51% ± 11). Cystatin C rebounded to 95% ± 5% of predialysis concentration by 12 hours postdialysis. The two-pool kinetic model showed excellent goodness of fit. Modeled extracellular cystatin C pool volume is smaller than that predicted, comprising 25.5% ± 9.2 of total body water. Iterated parameters, including nonrenal clearance, showed wide interindividual variation. Modeled nonrenal clearance was substantially higher than renal clearance in this population at 25.1 ± 6.6 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) body surface area.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma cystatin C levels may be used to measure middle-molecule clearance. Levels rebound substantially postdialysis and plateau in the interdialytic period. At low GFR, nonrenal clearance predominates over renal clearance, and its interindividual variation will limit use of cystatin C to predict residual renal function in advanced kidney disease.

Predicting residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis patients using an estimated glomerular filtration rate based on serum creatinine levels

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate regression equations correcting estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the clinical significance of the corrected eGFRs calculated using these equations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The authors determined how well corrected eGFR values calculated using regression equations predict residual renal function (RRF).

RESULTS

RRF values were correlated with all eGFR values of nonanuric patients of both genders. Peritoneal creatinine clearance values were not correlated with eGFRs in anuric patients of either gender. In males, eGFR biases ranged from -5.66 to -3.25, and in females, from -5.96 to -3.21. However, these biases decreased when eGFR values were transformed to corrected eGFR values. The area under the curve of the corrected eGFR values was acceptable for a diagnosis of RRF loss.

CONCLUSION

Corrected eGFR values obtained using these methods may provide an alternative means of predicting RRF without 24-hour urine collection.

Endogenous markers for estimation of renal function in peritoneal dialysis patients

OBJECTIVE

This method comparison study, conducted at the peritoneal dialysis (PD) outpatient clinic of the Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, set out to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of methods for estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on endogenous markers in PD patients.

PATIENTS

The 12 consecutive patients included in the study were examined twice while in a stable condition. All patients finished the study. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years or older, ability to collect 24-hour urine, and urine production greater than 300 mL in 24 hours.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The methods for estimating GFR using endogenous markers included the average of urinary clearances of creatinine and urea [U-Cl(crea-urea)] and two equations using the serum concentration of cystatin C [eGFR(CysC)]. The resulting GFR estimates were compared with those obtained using urinary and corrected plasma clearances of (51)Cr-EDTA [U-Cl(EDTA) and cP-Cl(EDTA)], the corrected plasma clearance being plasma clearance minus dialysate clearance.

RESULTS

Compared with the U-Cl(EDTA), the U-Cl(crea-urea) GFR estimate was 12% higher [95% confidence limits (CL): 3%, 21%]. Although significantly different (p = 0.01), the latter two methods showed the best agreement. The estimates obtained using the eGFR(CysC) methods were skewed from y = x compared with the estimates obtained using other methods, indicating strong bias, probably because of extrarenal elimination. The cP-Cl(EDTA) estimate was 34% (95% CL: 26%, 42%), higher than the U-Cl(EDTA) estimate (p < 0.001). The reproducibility (coefficients of variation) differed significantly between methods: cP-Cl(EDTA), 7%; U-Cl(EDTA), 14%; U-Cl(crea-urea), 18%; and both eGFR(CysC) methods, 3%.

CONCLUSIONS

In PD patients, GFR may be estimated as U-Cl(crea-urea) when complete urine collection is performed, taking into account an overestimation of approximately 12%. The available equations for eGFR(CysC) seem to be inaccurate; further development and validation is desirable. Omitting the eGFR(CysC) methods, cP-Cl(EDTA) was the most reproducible method and might be useful in certain situations.

Emerging importance of residual renal function in end-stage renal failure

Residual renal function (RRF) is well recognized as an important marker of outcomes in peritoneal dialysis (PD), and contributes vitally to solute clearance. Recently, its importance in hemodialysis (HD) has emerged with evidence that it is strongly associated with improved outcomes. The presence of RRF is associated with improved nutrition, reduced erythropoetin requirements, better potassium clearance, and improved quality of life. Retrospective and observational evidence is now available, which suggests that the presence of RRF is independently associated with survival and that this benefit goes beyond what is expected simply from augmentation of small solute clearance. Preservation of RRF is now considered by many to be an important aspect of dialysis strategy. Evidence in favor of one modality over another for preservation of RRF is conflicting, as are the potential benefits of biocompatible fluids in PD. In HD, the evidence in favor of biocompatible membranes is stronger. Emerging evidence is broadly in favor of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors for preservation of RRF. Diuretics appear to have a neutral effect. The complexities and practical difficulties in measurement of RRF have resulted in this important parameter being largely ignored in HD. Novel markers of renal function may provide alternative, simple methods of estimating RRF, which may remove the need for urine collections and simplify its measurement.