1
|
Favi E, Cresseri D, Perego M, Ikehata M, Iesari S, Campise MR, Morello W, Testa S, Sioli V, Mattinzoli D, Longhi E, Del Gobbo A, Castellano G, Ferraresso M. Sequential administration of anti-complement component C5 eculizumab and type-2 anti-CD20 obinutuzumab for the treatment of early antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: A proof of concept. Clin Immunol 2024; 264:110240. [PMID: 38734036 DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2024.110240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
Kidney transplant (KT) candidates with donor-specific antibodies (DSA) exhibit exceedingly high antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and allograft loss rates. Currently, treatment of ABMR remains an unmet clinical need. We report the use of the anti-C5 eculizumab and the type-2 anti-CD20 obinutuzumab in two patients with early ABMR. Eculizumab (900 mg IV) led to complete inhibition of the terminal complement cascade (unremarkable AP50 and CH50 activity) and prompt stoppage of complement-dependent antibody-mediated allograft injury (clearance of intra-graft C4d and C5b-9 deposition). Despite complement inhibition, obinutuzumab (1000 mg IV) determined full and long-lasting peripheral B-cell depletion, with significant reduction in all DSA. Graft function improved, remaining stable up to three years of follow-up. No signs of active ABMR and rebound DSA were detected. Obinutuzumab B-cell depletion and inhibition of DSA production were not affected by complement blockage. Further studies are needed to confirm the potential benefit of obinutuzumab in association with complement inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evaldo Favi
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.
| | - Donata Cresseri
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Perego
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Masami Ikehata
- Renal Research Laboratory, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Samuele Iesari
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Rosaria Campise
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - William Morello
- Pediatric Nephrology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Testa
- Pediatric Nephrology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Viviana Sioli
- Laboratorio di Immunologia dei Trapianti, Trapianti Lombardia - NITp, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Deborah Mattinzoli
- Renal Research Laboratory, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Longhi
- Laboratorio di Immunologia dei Trapianti, Trapianti Lombardia - NITp, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Del Gobbo
- Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Castellano
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Mariano Ferraresso
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kilambi V, Barah M, Formica RN, Friedewald JJ, Mehrotra S. Evaluation of Opening Offers Early for Deceased Donor Kidneys at Risk of Nonutilization. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2024; 19:233-240. [PMID: 37943856 PMCID: PMC10861110 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.0000000000000346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing nonutilization of kidneys recovered from deceased donors is a current policy concern for kidney allocation in the United States. The likelihood of nonutilization is greater with a higher kidney donor risk index (KDRI) offer. We examine how opening offers for organs with KDRI >1.75 to the broader waitlist at varying points of time affects usage rates. METHODS We simulate kidney allocation using data for January 2018 to June 2019 from Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. For the simulation experiment, allocation policy is modified so that KDRI >1.75 organs are offered to all local candidates (same donation service area) after a set amount of cold time simultaneously. Open offers to candidates nationally are similarly examined. RESULTS Simulation results ( n =50 replications) estimate that opening offers locally for KDRI >1.75 after 10 hours yields a nonutilization rate of 38% (range: 35%-42%), less than the prevailing rate of 55% of KDRI >1.75 kidneys. Opening offers after 5 hours yields 30% (range: 26%-34%), reducing the prevailing nonutilization rate by 45%. Opening offers nationally after 10 and 5 hours yields nonutilization rates of 11% (range: 8%-15%) and 6% (range: 4%-9%) for KDRI >1.75 kidneys, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Simulation findings indicate that opening offers and adjusting their timing can significantly reduce nonutilization of high-KDRI kidneys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram Kilambi
- Department of Engineering and Applied Sciences, RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia
- RAND Health Care, Access and Delivery Program, RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Masoud Barah
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Richard N. Formica
- Department of Nephrology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - John J. Friedewald
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Center for Engineering and Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sanjay Mehrotra
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Center for Engineering and Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Armstrong-Jr R, Ricardo-da-Silva FY, Vidal-Dos-Santos M, da Anunciação LF, Ottens PJ, Correia CJ, Moreira LFP, Leuvenink HGD, Breithaupt-Faloppa AC. Comparison of acute kidney injury following brain death between male and female rats. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2023; 78:100222. [PMID: 37257364 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical reports associate kidneys from female donors with worse prognostic in male recipients. Brain Death (BD) produces immunological and hemodynamic disorders that affect organ viability. Following BD, female rats are associated with increased renal inflammation interrelated with female sex hormone reduction. Here, the aim was to investigate the effects of sex on BD-induced Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) using an Isolated Perfused rat Kidney (IPK) model. METHODS Wistar rats, females, and males (8 weeks old), were maintained for 4h after BD. A left nephrectomy was performed and the kidney was preserved in a cold saline solution (30 min). IPK was performed under normothermic temperature (37°C) for 90 min using WME as perfusion solution. AKI was assessed by morphological analyses, staining of complement system components and inflammatory cell markers, perfusion flow, and creatinine clearance. RESULTS BD-male kidneys had decreased perfusion flow on IPK, a phenomenon that was not observed in the kidneys of BD-females (p < 0.0001). BD-male kidneys presented greater proximal (p = 0.0311) and distal tubule (p = 0.0029) necrosis. However, BD-female kidneys presented higher expression of eNOS (p = 0.0060) and greater upregulation of inflammatory mediators, iNOS (p = 0.0051), and Caspase-3 (p = 0.0099). In addition, both sexes had increased complement system formation (C5b-9) (p=0.0005), glomerular edema (p = 0.0003), and nNOS (p = 0.0051). CONCLUSION The present data revealed an important sex difference in renal perfusion in the IPK model, evidenced by a pronounced reduction in perfusate flow and low eNOS expression in the BD-male group. Nonetheless, the upregulation of genes related to the proinflammatory cascade suggests a progressive inflammatory process in BD-female kidneys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Armstrong-Jr
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Fernanda Yamamoto Ricardo-da-Silva
- Laboratório de Cirurgia Cardiovascular e Fisiopatologia da Circulação (LIM-11), Instituto do Coração (InCor), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Marina Vidal-Dos-Santos
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Laboratório de Cirurgia Cardiovascular e Fisiopatologia da Circulação (LIM-11), Instituto do Coração (InCor), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Lucas Ferreira da Anunciação
- Laboratório de Cirurgia Cardiovascular e Fisiopatologia da Circulação (LIM-11), Instituto do Coração (InCor), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Petra J Ottens
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Cristiano Jesus Correia
- Laboratório de Cirurgia Cardiovascular e Fisiopatologia da Circulação (LIM-11), Instituto do Coração (InCor), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Luiz Felipe Pinho Moreira
- Laboratório de Cirurgia Cardiovascular e Fisiopatologia da Circulação (LIM-11), Instituto do Coração (InCor), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | - Ana Cristina Breithaupt-Faloppa
- Laboratório de Cirurgia Cardiovascular e Fisiopatologia da Circulação (LIM-11), Instituto do Coração (InCor), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Altun E, Yavuz M. Long-Term Outcomes of Kidney Paired Donation Transplantation: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study. Transplant Proc 2023; 55:325-331. [PMID: 36890053 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the kidney paired donation (KPD) program recipients with the traditional living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) recipients regarding patient and graft survival. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 141 recipients of the KPD program and 141 classic LDKT recipients that we matched for age and sex as controls between July 2005 and June 2019. We compared the 2 transplant groups for patient and kidney survival using the Kaplan-Maier test. We also performed Cox Regression analysis to examine factors affecting patient survival, including transplant type. RESULTS The average follow-up period was 96.17 ± 44.22 months. Of the 282 patients, 88 died in the follow-up period. There was no statistically significant difference in graft and patient survival between the KPD and LDKT groups. In the Cox regression model, including the transplant type, only the serum creatinine level measured in the first month after discharge was a significant factor in predicting patient survival. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study indicate that the KPD program is an effective and reliable method to increase LDKT. Country-wide multicentric studies should confirm the results of this study. In countries where cadaver transplantation is insufficient, efforts should be made to expand the KPD program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eda Altun
- Bahcesehir University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Goztepe Medicalpark Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Melike Yavuz
- Bahcesehir University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Istanbul
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Steggerda JA, Ladner DP, Kim IK, Wisel SA, Borja-Cacho D. A Retrospective Evaluation of Changing Health Characteristics Amongst Deceased Organ Donors in the United States. Transplant Proc 2023; 55:251-262. [PMID: 36870869 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The availability of suitable donor organs remains a limiting factor to performing life-saving transplant operations. This study evaluates changes in the health of the donor population and its influence on organ use in the United States. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed using the OPTN STAR data file from 2005 to 2019. Three donor eras were defined: 1) 2005 to 2009, 2) 2010 to 2014, and 3) 2015 to 2019. The primary outcome was donor use, defined as transplantation of at least one solid organ. Descriptive analyses were performed, and associations of donor use were examined with multivariable logistic regression models. P values <.01 were considered significant. RESULTS The cohort included 132,783 potential donors of which 124,729 (93.9%) were used for transplantation. Donor median age was 42 years (interquartile range 26-54), 53,566 (40.3%) were female, and 88,209 (66.4%) were White, 21,834 (16.4%) were black, and 18,509 (13.9%) were Hispanic. Compared with donors from Eras 1 and 2, donors in Era 3 were younger (P < .001), had higher body mass index (BMI) (P < .001), increased rates of diabetes mellitus (DM) (P < .001), hepatitis C virus (HCV) positivity (P < .001) and more comorbidities (P < .001). Multivariable modeling found donor BMI, DM, hypertension, and HCV status as health factors significantly associated with donor use. Compared with Era 1, there was increased use in Era 3 of donors with BMI ≥30 kg/m2, DM, hypertension, HCV-positive status, and donors with ≥3 comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS Despite an increasing prevalence of chronic health problems in the donor population, donors with multiple comorbid conditions are more likely to be used for transplantation in recent years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin A Steggerda
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Daniela P Ladner
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC0), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Irene K Kim
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Steven A Wisel
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daniel Borja-Cacho
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tantisattamo E, Maggiore U, Piccoli GB. History of kidney transplantation: a journey of progression and evolution for success. J Nephrol 2022; 35:1783-1786. [PMID: 36040564 PMCID: PMC9425794 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-022-01453-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ekamol Tantisattamo
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Medicine, Harold Simmons Center for Kidney Disease Research and Epidemiology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA, USA
- Nephrology Section, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA, USA
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Multi-Organ Transplant Center, William Beaumont Hospital, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Umberto Maggiore
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huijben JA, Kramer A, Kerschbaum J, de Meester J, Collart F, Arévalo OLR, Helve J, Lassalle M, Palsson R, Ten Dam M, Casula A, Methven S, Ortiz A, Ferraro PM, Segelmark M, Mingo PU, Arici M, Reisæter AV, Stendahl M, Stel VS, Jager KJ. Increasing numbers and improved overall survival of patients on kidney replacement therapy over the last decade in Europe: an ERA Registry study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022; 38:1027-1040. [PMID: 35974693 PMCID: PMC10064979 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to describe the trends in the incidence, prevalence and survival of patients on kidney replacement therapy (KRT) for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) across Europe from 2008 to 2017. METHODS Data from renal registries in 9 countries and 16 regions that provided individual patient data to the ERA Registry from 2008 to 2017 were included. These registries cover 34% of the general population in Europe. Crude and standardized incidence and prevalence per million population (pmp) were determined. Trends over time were studied using Joinpoint regression. Survival probabilities were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS The standardized incidence of KRT was stable (annual percentage change [APC]: -1.48 [-3.15; 0.21]) from 2008 (146.0 pmp) to 2011 (141.6 pmp), followed by a slight increase (APC: 1.01 [0.43; 1.60]) to 148.0 pmp in 2017, although trends in incidence varied across countries. This increase was primarily due to a rise in the incidence of KRT in men older than 65 years. Moreover, as a cause of kidney failure, diabetes mellitus is increasing. The standardized prevalence increased from 2008 (990.0 pmp) to 2017 (1166.8 pmp) (APC: 1.82 [1.75; 1.89]). Patient survival on KRT improved in the time period 2011-2013 compared with 2008-2010 (adjusted HR: 0.94 [0.93; 0.95). CONCLUSION This study showed an overall increase in the incidence and prevalence of KRT for ESKD as well as an increase in the KRT patient survival over the last decade in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jilske A Huijben
- Department of Medical Informatics, ERA-EDTA Registry, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke Kramer
- Department of Medical Informatics, ERA-EDTA Registry, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julia Kerschbaum
- Austrian Dialysis and Transplant Registry, Department of Internal Medicine IV - Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Johan de Meester
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Hypertension, Dutch-speaking Belgian Renal Registry (NBVN), Sint-Niklaas, Belgium
| | | | - Olga Lucía Rodríguez Arévalo
- Valencia Region Renal Registry, Dirección General de Salut Publica i Adiccions, Valencia, Spain.,Doctoral student of the Technologies for Health and Well-being program, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaakko Helve
- Finnish Registry for Kidney Diseases, Helsinki, Finland.,Abdominal Center Nephrology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mathilde Lassalle
- REIN Registry, Agence de la Biomédecine, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France
| | - Runolfur Palsson
- Division of Nephrology, Landspitali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.,Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Marc Ten Dam
- Dutch Registry RENINE, Nefrovisie, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Casula
- UK Renal Registry, the Renal Association, Bristol, UK
| | - Shona Methven
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill Health Campus, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Alberto Ortiz
- School of Medicine, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, University Autonoma of Madrid, FRIAT and REDINREN, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pietro Manuel Ferraro
- U.O.S. Terapia Conservativa della Malattia Renale Cronica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Mårten Segelmark
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Nephrology, Lund University and Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Swedish Renal Registry, Department of Internal Medicine, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Pablo Ucio Mingo
- Coordinador Autonómico de Trasplantes de Castilla y León, Dirección General de Planificación y Asistencia Sanitaria, Valladolid, Castilla y León, Spain
| | - Mustafa Arici
- Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Anna Varberg Reisæter
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University hospital, Rikshospitalet, Norway
| | - Maria Stendahl
- Swedish Renal Registry, Department of Internal Medicine, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Vianda S Stel
- Department of Medical Informatics, ERA-EDTA Registry, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kitty J Jager
- Department of Medical Informatics, ERA-EDTA Registry, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bestard O, Thaunat O, Bellini MI, Böhmig GA, Budde K, Claas F, Couzi L, Furian L, Heemann U, Mamode N, Oberbauer R, Pengel L, Schneeberger S, Naesens M. Alloimmune Risk Stratification for Kidney Transplant Rejection. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10138. [PMID: 35669972 PMCID: PMC9163827 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Different types of kidney transplantations are performed worldwide, including biologically diverse donor/recipient combinations, which entail distinct patient/graft outcomes. Thus, proper immunological and non-immunological risk stratification should be considered, especially for patients included in interventional randomized clinical trials. This paper was prepared by a working group within the European Society for Organ Transplantation, which submitted a Broad Scientific Advice request to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) relating to clinical trial endpoints in kidney transplantation. After collaborative interactions, the EMA sent its final response in December 2020, highlighting the following: 1) transplantations performed between human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical donors and recipients carry significantly lower immunological risk than those from HLA-mismatched donors; 2) for the same allogeneic molecular HLA mismatch load, kidney grafts from living donors carry significantly lower immunological risk because they are better preserved and therefore less immunogenic than grafts from deceased donors; 3) single-antigen bead testing is the gold standard to establish the repertoire of serological sensitization and is used to define the presence of a recipient's circulating donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSA); 4) molecular HLA mismatch analysis should help to further improve organ allocation compatibility and stratify immunological risk for primary alloimmune activation, but without consensus regarding which algorithm and cut-off to use it is difficult to integrate information into clinical practice/study design; 5) further clinical validation of other immune assays, such as those measuring anti-donor cellular memory (T/B cell ELISpot assays) and non-HLA-DSA, is needed; 6) routine clinical tests that reliably measure innate immune alloreactivity are lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oriol Bestard
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology, and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | - Georg A Böhmig
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frans Claas
- Eurotransplant Reference Laboratory, Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Lionel Couzi
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Dialysis, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Uwe Heemann
- Department of Nephrology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Liset Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of General, Transplant, and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chandra Shrestha P, Bhandari TR, Adhikari R, Baral H, Verma RK, Shrestha KK. Living donor kidney paired exchange: An observational study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 78:103761. [PMID: 35734678 PMCID: PMC9206995 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESKD). Kidney paired donation (KPD) provides the chance to match an incompatible donor/recipient pair with another donor and recipient in a similar condition. We aimed to compare the outcomes of pair exchange kidney transplantation with traditional live donor kidney transplantation in our context. Method A review of medical records of 62 patients (31 pairs) who underwent two-way conventional living kidney pair exchange from July 2016 to June 2021 was done. The control group was considered those 62 patients who had undergone classic live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) during the study period. The patient's demographics, intraoperative and postoperative variables including delayed graft function, length of hospital stay, graft survival, patient survival, and rejections rates were compared between the groups (KPD and LDKT). Results The majority of recipients were male (77.4 and 80.6%) while donors were female (77.4 and 69.4%) in KPD and the LDKT groups. Mean ages were 37 years (range: 19–59) and 37 years (range: 17–65) for the recipient's in KPD and the LDKT. KPD transplantation was performed in 62 recipients to avoid blood group incompatibility. There were no significant differences in outcomes comprising delayed graft function (1.6 and 3.2%), graft survival (100% in both groups), patient survival (95.2 and 96.8%), and rejections rates (1.6 and 1.6%) between KPD and LDKT group (P > 0.005). The length of stay was similar (5.9 and 5.7 days) in KPD and LDKT groups (P > 0.005). Conclusions The outcomes of KPD were comparable with classic LDKT in terms of delayed graft function, length of hospital stay, graft survival, patient survival, and rejections rates in our study. Therefore, the kidney paired donation program should be encouraged and promoted in centers where the ABO-incompatible transplant is expensive with added risk and the rate of deceased donor transplantation is very low. Kidney paired donation (KPD) provides the chance to match for an incompatible donor/recipient pair with another donor and recipient in a similar condition. The outcomes of KPD were comparable with classic live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) in this study. KPD program should be promoted in centers where the ABO incompatible transplant is expensive with added risk and the rate of deceased donor transplantation is very low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pukar Chandra Shrestha
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Shahid Dharmabhakta National Transplant Centre, Bhaktapur, Nepal
| | - Tika Ram Bhandari
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Shahid Dharmabhakta National Transplant Centre, Bhaktapur, Nepal
- Corresponding author. Department of Transplant Surgery, Shahid Dharmabhakta National Transplant Centre (SDNTC), Bhaktapur, Nepal.
| | - Rojan Adhikari
- Department of Urology, Shahid Dharmabhakta National Transplant Centre, Bhaktapur, Nepal
| | - Hari Baral
- Department of Urology, Shahid Dharmabhakta National Transplant Centre, Bhaktapur, Nepal
| | - Rakesh Kumar Verma
- Department of Urology, Shahid Dharmabhakta National Transplant Centre, Bhaktapur, Nepal
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Huang J, Han Q, Cai M, Zhu J, Li L, Yu L, Wang Z, Fan G, Zhu Y, Lu J, Zhou G. Effect of Angiogenesis in Bone Tissue Engineering. Ann Biomed Eng 2022; 50:898-913. [PMID: 35525871 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-022-02970-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The reconstruction of large skeletal defects is still a tricky challenge in orthopedics. The newly formed bone tissue migrates sluggishly from the periphery to the center of the scaffold due to the restrictions of exchange of oxygen and nutrition impotent cells osteogenic differentiation. Angiogenesis plays an important role in bone reconstruction and more and more studies on angiogenesis in bone tissue engineering had been published. Promising advances of angiogenesis in bone tissue engineering by scaffold designs, angiogenic factor delivery, in vivo prevascularization and in vitro prevascularization are discussed in detail. Among all the angiogenesis mode, angiogenic factor delivery is the common methods of angiogenesis in bone tissue engineering and possible research directions in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianhao Huang
- Department of Orthopedics, Jinling Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Nanjing, 210002, People's Republic of China
| | - Qixiu Han
- Department of Orthopedics, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210002, People's Republic of China
| | - Meng Cai
- Department of Orthopedics, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210002, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Zhu
- Department of Orthopedics, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210002, People's Republic of China
| | - Lan Li
- State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China
| | - Lingfeng Yu
- Department of Orthopedics, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhen Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210002, People's Republic of China
| | - Gentao Fan
- Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, 305 Zhongshan East Road, Nanjing, 210002, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Zhu
- Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, 305 Zhongshan East Road, Nanjing, 210002, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingwei Lu
- Department of Orthopedics, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210002, People's Republic of China. .,Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, 305 Zhongshan East Road, Nanjing, 210002, People's Republic of China.
| | - Guangxin Zhou
- Department of Orthopedics, Jinling Hospital, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Nanjing, 210002, People's Republic of China. .,Department of Orthopedics, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, People's Republic of China. .,Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, 305 Zhongshan East Road, Nanjing, 210002, People's Republic of China. .,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Laure D, Lore W, Ann R, Koen VH, Katty VC, Johan VW, Evelien S, Elena L, Noël K, Agnieszka P. The choice between deceased and living donor kidney transplantation in children and adolescents: a multicentric cross-sectional study. Acta Clin Belg 2021; 77:861-867. [PMID: 34802397 DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2021.2000176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of our study was to evaluate the factors influencing the choice between a deceased donor (DD) and living donor kidney transplantation (LD KT) for children and adolescents with chronic kidney disease (CKD) from the perspective of parents and physicians. METHODS Patients with CKD stages 4 and 5 at the University Hospitals of Ghent, Leuven and Antwerp were included. Between February 2019 and March 2020, the corresponding questionnaires were distributed among parents and physicians in order to evaluate the potential differences between the medical recommendation and parental choice. RESULTS Twenty-eight patients (median age 11 yr, range 2-19 yr), 10 girls and 18 boys were included. Three patients had undergone kidney transplantation in the past. Parents of 13 children opted for DD and 13 LD, and in two cases, there was no preference. Physicians recommended DD in 14 cases and LD in 14 cases. Parental choice corresponded with physician's recommendation in 22 cases. Parental reasons for choosing DD were medical (n = 7), socio-economic (n = 1), combination of both (n = 1) or no reason (n = 4). Pediatric nephrologists advised against LD for medical (n = 6) or socio-economic (n = 6) reasons or a combination of both (n = 2). CONCLUSION In our cohort, the treating physicians regarded the family's socio-economic factors more important for not actively promoting LD than the parents. A better understanding and communication regarding perceived socio-economic hurdles between caretakers and families might contribute to a higher incidence of living kidney donation in Belgium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dierickx Laure
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology and Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Willem Lore
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Raes Ann
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology and Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Van Hoeck Koen
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Van Cauwenberghe Katty
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology and Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Vande Walle Johan
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology and Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Snauwaert Evelien
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology and Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Levtchenko Elena
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Knops Noël
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Prytula Agnieszka
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology and Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Montero N, Toapanta N, Pallarès N, Crespo M, Diekmann F, Guirado L, Esteban R, Codina S, Melilli E, Buxeda A, Velis G, Torres IB, Revuelta I, Molina Andujar A, Facundo C, Bardají B, Riera L, Fiol M, Cruzado JM, Comas J, Giral M, Naesens M, Åsberg A, Moreso F, Bestard O. Deciphering transplant outcomes of expanded kidney allografts donated after controlled circulatory death in the current transplant era. A call for caution. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2494-2506. [PMID: 34626501 DOI: 10.1111/tri.14131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT) after controlled circulatory death (cDCD) with highly expanded criteria donors (ECD) and recipients have not been thoroughly evaluated. We analyzed in a multicenter cohort of 1161 consecutive KT, granular baseline donor and recipient factors predicting transplant outcomes, selected by bootstrapping and Cox proportional hazards, and were validated in a contemporaneous European KT cohort (n = 1585). 74.3% were DBD and 25.7% cDCD-KT. ECD-KT showed the poorest graft survival rates, irrespective of cDCD or DBD (log-rank < 0.001). Besides standard ECD classification, dialysis vintage, older age, and previous cardiovascular recipient events together with low class-II-HLA match, long cold ischemia time and combining a diabetic donor with a cDCD predicted graft loss (C-Index 0.715, 95% CI 0.675-0.755). External validation showed good prediction accuracy (C-Index 0.697, 95%CI 0.643-0.741). Recipient older age, male gender, dialysis vintage, previous cardiovascular events, and receiving a cDCD independently predicted patient death. Benefit/risk assessment of undergoing KT was compared with concurrent waitlisted candidates, and despite the fact that undergoing KT outperformed remaining waitlisted, remarkably high mortality rates were predicted if KT was undertaken under the worst risk-prediction model. Strategies to increase the donor pool, including cDCD transplants with highly expanded donor and recipient candidates, should be performed with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuria Montero
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L' Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Néstor Toapanta
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Natàlia Pallarès
- Biostatistics Unit, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Marta Crespo
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Hospital Clínic Provincial, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica August Pi i Sunyer, RedInRen, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lluis Guirado
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rafael Esteban
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L' Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sergi Codina
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L' Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Melilli
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L' Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Buxeda
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gonzalo Velis
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Irina B Torres
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Hospital Clínic Provincial, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica August Pi i Sunyer, RedInRen, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Molina Andujar
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Hospital Clínic Provincial, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica August Pi i Sunyer, RedInRen, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carme Facundo
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Beatriz Bardají
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lluís Riera
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L' Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Fiol
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L' Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep M Cruzado
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L' Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Comas
- Catalan Organ Transplant Organization, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Magali Giral
- CRTI UMR 1064, Inserm, Université de Nantes, ITUN, CHU Nantes, RTRS Centaure, Nantes, France
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anders Åsberg
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Francesc Moreso
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L' Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cholesterol Embolization Syndrome After Kidney Transplantation: A Case Series and Systematic Review. Transplant Direct 2021; 7:e717. [PMID: 34476296 PMCID: PMC8384396 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background. Cholesterol embolization syndrome (CES) is an uncommon but well-known cause of renal failure in native kidneys, but little is known about CES in kidney transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, clinical characteristics, histopathology, and prognosis of CES after kidney transplantation. Methods. CES cases in both transplanted and native kidneys (control group) were identified by searching the databases of the divisions of Nephrology and Pathology of our institution. Clinical data were retrospectively collected. Biopsies were classified according to the latest Banff 2019 Update. Second, a systematic literature search was performed (December 01, 2020) of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Results. CES was observed in for-cause biopsies of 11 out of 2350 (0.47%) kidney transplant recipients transplanted between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2018 (0.0009 cases per person-year). All patients had ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor, and 9 donors were expanded criteria donors. Graft loss occurred in 27.3% of the patients diagnosed with CES. Eight transplant biopsies with CES were also classified as biopsy-proven acute rejection. Transplant biopsies showed signs of inflammation (arteritis, n = 7; interstitial inflammation, n = 5; tubulitis, n = 7). One patient with CES in a native kidney was identified. The biopsy of the native kidney only showed arteritis and classified as an isolated “v” lesion. The literature search resulted in 188 unique articles of which 20 were included. A total of 47 cases of CES after kidney transplantation was reported. Cholesterol emboli were found in <1% of all kidney transplant biopsies. In 57.8% of the kidney transplant biopsies with CES described in literature, concomitant inflammation was present. Conclusions. CES is an uncommon cause of kidney transplant failure, although the incidence of CES may be underestimated. CES may mimic rejection as it can be accompanied by arteritis.
Collapse
|
14
|
Garcia LE, Parra N, Gaynor JJ, Baker L, Guerra G, Ciancio G. Clinical Outcomes Following Single vs. Multiple Vessel Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Comparison of 210 Patients. Front Surg 2021; 8:693021. [PMID: 34195224 PMCID: PMC8236516 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.693021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The use of living-donor kidney allografts with multiple vessels continues to rise in order to increase the donor pool. This requires surgeons to pursue vascular reconstructions more often, which has previously been associated with a higher risk of developing early post-transplant complications. We therefore wanted to investigate the prognostic role of using living-donor renal allografts with a single artery (SA) vs. multiple arteries (MA) at the time of transplant. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 210 consecutive living-donor kidney transplants performed between January, 2008 and March, 2019, and compared the incidence of developing postoperative complications and other clinical outcomes between SA vs. MA recipients. Results: No differences were observed between SA (N = 161) and MA (N = 49) kidneys in terms of the incidence of developing a postoperative (or surgical) complication, a urologic complication, hospital length of stay, delayed graft function, estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 or 12 mo post-transplant, and graft survival. Conclusions: The use of live-kidney allografts with MA requiring vascular reconstruction shows excellent clinical outcomes and does not increase the risk of developing postoperative complications or other adverse outcomes when compared with SA renal allografts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo E Garcia
- Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Natalia Parra
- Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Jeffrey J Gaynor
- Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.,Departments of Surgery and Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Lauren Baker
- Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Giselle Guerra
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Gaetano Ciancio
- Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.,Departments of Surgery and Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Marew T, Birhanu G. Three dimensional printed nanostructure biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Regen Ther 2021; 18:102-111. [PMID: 34141834 PMCID: PMC8178073 DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2021.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The suffering from organ dysfunction due to damaged or diseased tissue/bone has been globally on the rise. Current treatment strategies for non-union bone defects include: the use of autografts, allografts, synthetic grafts and free vascularized fibular grafts. Bone tissue engineering has emerged as an alternative for fracture repair to satisfy the current unmet need of bone grafts and to alleviate the problems associated with autografts and allografts. The technology offers the possibility to induce new functional bone regeneration using synergistic combination of functional biomaterials (scaffolds), cells, and growth factors. Bone scaffolds are typically made of porous biodegradable materials that provide the mechanical support during repair and regeneration of damaged or diseased bone. Significant progress has been made towards scaffold materials for structural support, desired osteogenesis and angiogenesis abilities. Thanks for innovative scaffolds fabrication technologies, bioresorbable scaffolds with controlled porosity and tailored properties are possible today. Despite the presence of different bone scaffold fabrication methods, pore size, shape and interconnectivity have not yet been fully controlled in most of the methods. Moreover, scaffolds with tailored porosity for specific defects are still difficult to manufacture. Nevertheless, such scaffolds can be designed and fabricated using three dimensional (3D) printing approaches. 3D printing technology, as an advanced tissue scaffold fabrication method, offers the opportunity to produce complex geometries with distinct advantages. The technology has been used for the production of various types of bodily constructs such as blood vessels, vascular networks, bones, cartilages, exoskeletons, eyeglasses, cell cultures, tissues, organs and novel drug delivery devices. This review focuses on 3D printed scaffolds and their application in bone repair and regeneration. In addition, different classes of biomaterials commonly employed for the fabrication of 3D nano scaffolds for bone tissue engineering application so far are briefly discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tesfa Marew
- Department of Pharmaceutics & Social Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Gebremariam Birhanu
- Department of Pharmaceutics & Social Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
de Jong RW, Stel VS, Heaf JG, Murphy M, Massy ZA, Jager KJ. Non-medical barriers reported by nephrologists when providing renal replacement therapy or comprehensive conservative management to end-stage kidney disease patients: a systematic review. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021; 36:848-862. [PMID: 31898742 PMCID: PMC8075372 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfz271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large international differences exist in access to renal replacement therapy (RRT) modalities and comprehensive conservative management (CCM) for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), suggesting that some patients are not receiving the most appropriate treatment. Previous studies mainly focused on barriers reported by patients or medical barriers (e.g. comorbidities) reported by nephrologists. An overview of the non-medical barriers reported by nephrologists when providing the most appropriate form of RRT (other than conventional in-centre haemodialysis) or CCM is lacking. METHODS We searched in EMBASE and PubMed for original articles with a cross-sectional design (surveys, interviews or focus groups) published between January 2010 and September 2018. We included studies in which nephrologists reported barriers when providing RRT or CCM to adult patients with ESKD. We used the barriers and facilitators survey by Peters et al. [Ruimte Voor Verandering? Knelpunten en Mogelijkheden Voor Verbeteringen in de Patiëntenzorg. Nijmegen: Afdeling Kwaliteit van zorg (WOK), 2003] as preliminary framework to create our own model and performed meta-ethnographic analysis of non-medical barriers in text, tables and figures. RESULTS Of the 5973 articles screened, 16 articles were included using surveys (n = 10), interviews (n = 5) and focus groups (n = 1). We categorized the barriers into three levels: patient level (e.g. attitude, role perception, motivation, knowledge and socio-cultural background), level of the healthcare professional (e.g. fears and concerns, working style, communication skills) and level of the healthcare system (e.g. financial barriers, supportive staff and practice organization). CONCLUSIONS Our systematic review has identified a number of modifiable, non-medical barriers that could be targeted by, for example, education and optimizing financing structure to improve access to RRT modalities and CCM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rianne W de Jong
- ERA-EDTA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vianda S Stel
- ERA-EDTA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - James G Heaf
- Department of Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Mark Murphy
- The Irish Kidney Association CLG, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ziad A Massy
- Division of Nephrology, Ambroise Paré University Hospital, APHP, University of Paris Ouest-Versailles-St-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Boulogne-Billancourt/Paris, France
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1018, Team 5, CESP UVSQ, University Paris Saclav, Villejuif, France
| | - Kitty J Jager
- ERA-EDTA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Palmisano A, Gandolfini I, Delsante M, Cantarelli C, Fiaccadori E, Cravedi P, Maggiore U. Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) before and after Kidney Transplantation: Causes, Medical Approach, and Implications for the Long-Term Outcomes. J Clin Med 2021; 10:1484. [PMID: 33918444 PMCID: PMC8038198 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common finding in kidney donors and recipients. AKI in kidney donor, which increases the risk of delayed graft function (DGF), may not by itself jeopardize the short- and long-term outcome of transplantation. However, some forms of AKI may induce graft rejection, fibrosis, and eventually graft dysfunction. Therefore, various strategies have been proposed to identify conditions at highest risk of AKI-induced DGF, that can be treated by targeting the donor, the recipient, or even the graft itself with the use of perfusion machines. AKI that occurs early post-transplant after a period of initial recovery of graft function may reflect serious and often occult systemic complications that may require prompt intervention to prevent graft loss. AKI that develops long after transplantation is often related to nephrotoxic drug reactions. In symptomatic patients, AKI is usually associated with various systemic medical complications and could represent a risk of mortality. Electronic systems have been developed to alert transplant physicians that AKI has occurred in a transplant recipient during long-term outpatient follow-up. Herein, we will review most recent understandings of pathophysiology, diagnosis, therapeutic approach, and short- and long-term consequences of AKI occurring in both the donor and in the kidney transplant recipient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Palmisano
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (I.G.); (M.D.); (C.C.); (E.F.); (U.M.)
| | - Ilaria Gandolfini
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (I.G.); (M.D.); (C.C.); (E.F.); (U.M.)
- Nephrology Unit, Parma University Hospital, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Marco Delsante
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (I.G.); (M.D.); (C.C.); (E.F.); (U.M.)
- Nephrology Unit, Parma University Hospital, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Chiara Cantarelli
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (I.G.); (M.D.); (C.C.); (E.F.); (U.M.)
| | - Enrico Fiaccadori
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (I.G.); (M.D.); (C.C.); (E.F.); (U.M.)
- Nephrology Unit, Parma University Hospital, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Paolo Cravedi
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA;
| | - Umberto Maggiore
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (I.G.); (M.D.); (C.C.); (E.F.); (U.M.)
- Nephrology Unit, Parma University Hospital, 43126 Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Impact of deceased donor with acute kidney injury on subsequent kidney transplant outcomes-an ANZDATA registry analysis. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0249000. [PMID: 33765036 PMCID: PMC7993825 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The need for kidney transplantation drives efforts to expand organ donation. The decision to accept organs from donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) can result in a clinical dilemma in the context of conflicting reports from published literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS This observational study included all deceased donor kidney transplants performed in Australia and New Zealand between 1997 and 2017. The association of donor-AKI, defined according to KDIGO criteria, with all-cause graft failure was evaluated by multivariable Cox regression. Secondary outcomes included death-censored graft failure, death, delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection. RESULTS The study included 10,101 recipients of kidneys from 5,774 deceased donors, of whom 1182 (12%) recipients received kidneys from 662 (11%) donors with AKI. There were 3,259 (32%) all-cause graft failures, which included 1,509 deaths with functioning graft. After adjustment for donor, recipient and transplant characteristics, donor AKI was not associated with all-cause graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.11, 95% CI 0.99-1.26), death-censored graft failure (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.92-1.28), death (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.98-1.35) or graft failure when death was evaluated as a competing event (sub-distribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.07, 95% CI 0.91-1.26). Donor AKI was not associated with acute rejection but was associated with DGF (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.27, 95% CI 1.92-2.68). CONCLUSION Donor AKI stage was not associated with any kidney transplant outcome, except DGF. Use of kidneys with AKI for transplantation appears to be justified.
Collapse
|
19
|
Gan CC, Jalalonmuhali M, Nordin NZ, Abdul Wahab MZ, Yahya R, Ng KP, Tan SY, Lim SK. ABO-Incompatible Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation in a Developing Country: A Multicenter Experience in Malaysia. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:856-864. [PMID: 33487455 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.10.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Malaysia has a low deceased-donor donation rate and has not embarked on a paired kidney exchange program; therefore, ABO-incompatible and HLA-incompatible transplantation remain the main contributor to the sustainability of the national kidney transplantation (KT) program. There were 26 cases of ABO-incompatible KTs performed from 2011 to 2018 in 3 major transplant centers, namely, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, University Malaya Medical Centre, and Prince Court Medical Centre. We collected perioperative and follow-up data through June 2019. The desensitization protocol varies and is center specific: the localized Japanese protocol and Swedish protocol with a target anti-A/B isoagglutinin titer of 16 or 32 on the day of transplant. The induction and tacrolimus-based maintenance protocol was nearly identical. The median follow-up time was 62.3 months (interquartile range, 37.0-79.7). Fifteen subjects had the highest predesensitization anti-A/B titer of ≥32 (57.7%). The acute cellular rejection and antibody-mediated rejection incidence were 12.5% (3 cases) and 8.3% (2 cases), respectively. Patient, graft, and death-censored graft survival rates were 96.2%, 92.3%, and 96.0%, respectively, 1 year post-living-donor KT (LDKT) and 96.2%, 87.2%, and 90.7%, respectively, 5 years post-LDKT. Our experience shows that ABO-incompatible LDKT using a suitable desensitization technique could be a safe and feasible choice for LDKT even with varied desensitization regimens for recipients with relatively high baseline isoagglutinin titers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C C Gan
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Jalan Universiti, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - M Jalalonmuhali
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Jalan Universiti, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - N Z Nordin
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Jalan Pahang, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - M Z Abdul Wahab
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Jalan Pahang, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - R Yahya
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Jalan Pahang, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - K P Ng
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Jalan Universiti, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - S Y Tan
- Department of Nephrology, Prince Court Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - S K Lim
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Jalan Universiti, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bader F, Manla Y, Hammouri M, Attallah AN. Organ Donation in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Transplantation 2021; 105:6-9. [PMID: 33350623 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Feras Bader
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Al Maryah Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Yosef Manla
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Al Maryah Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - And Nizar Attallah
- Medical Subspecialty Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sevmis M, Demir ME, Merhametsiz O, Aktas S, Sevmis S, Uyar M. Grafts With Multiple Renal Arteries in Kidney Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2020; 53:933-940. [PMID: 32950261 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Revised: 06/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Renal grafts with multiple renal arteries (MRA) are a compelling issue in surgery of kidney transplantation. Transplantations using "grafts with MRA" have conflicting results. Here, we present our experiences on the issue. METHOD This is a single-center, observational, descriptive study. One hundred ninety-nine patients with end-stage renal disease received a kidney graft from their living- or deceased-related donors in our center between July 2016 and May 2017. We included all recipients to the study. Patients were divided into the following 2 groups: Group 1, recipients who received a renal graft with single renal artery, and Group 2, recipients who received a renal graft with MRA. Groups were compared for estimated glomerular filtration rates (months 1-3 and 12), delayed graft function, and graft survival. Data were analyzed by using SPSS for Windows version 15. RESULTS One hundred ninety-five recipients with all documented data were analyzed. Graft function was compared between 2 groups in months 1, 3, and 12 and found both to have similar outcomes. MRA has been indicated to have no impact on delayed graft function, higher risk for vascular injury, and biopsy-proven acute tubular necrosis. Also, anastomosis sides have been found to have no importance on graft function in recipients with MRA (P > .05 between all sides). CONCLUSION Our study indicates grafts with MRA and grafts with a single renal artery have comparable results in the first post-transplant year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murat Sevmis
- Yeni Yuzyil University, School of Medicine, Private Gaziosmanpasa Hospital, Department of General Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Emin Demir
- Yeni Yuzyil University, School of Medicine, Private Gaziosmanpasa Hospital, Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Ozgur Merhametsiz
- Yeni Yuzyil University, School of Medicine, Private Gaziosmanpasa Hospital, Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sema Aktas
- Yeni Yuzyil University, School of Medicine, Private Gaziosmanpasa Hospital, Department of General Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sinasi Sevmis
- Yeni Yuzyil University, School of Medicine, Private Gaziosmanpasa Hospital, Department of General Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murathan Uyar
- Yeni Yuzyil University, School of Medicine, Private Gaziosmanpasa Hospital, Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Plage H, Pielka P, Liefeldt L, Budde K, Ebbing J, Sugünes N, Miller K, Cash H, Bichmann A, Sattler A, Kotsch K, Friedersdorff F. Extended Criteria Donors in Living Kidney Transplantation Including Donor Age, Smoking, Hypertension and BMI. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2020; 16:787-793. [PMID: 32922016 PMCID: PMC7455534 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s256962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose An expansion of selection criteria for deceased organ transplantation already exists to manage the current donor shortage. Comparable evaluation of risk factors for living donors should be investigated to improve this issue. Patients and Methods Our retrospective single-centre study analysed 158 patients with living kidney transplants performed between February 2006 and June 2012. We investigated the influence of donor risk factors (RF) including body mass index over 30 kg/m2, age >60 years, active nicotine abuse and arterial hypertension on postoperative kidney function with focus on the recipients. This was measured for long-term survival and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in a 5-year follow-up. Results Overall, out of 158 living donors, 84 donors were identified to have no risk factors, whereas 74 donors had at least one risk factor. We noted a significant higher delayed graft function (p=0.042) in the first 7 days after transplantation, as well as lower GFR of recipients of allografts with risk factors in the first-year after transplantation. In our long-term results, there was no significant difference in the functional outcome (graft function, recipient and graft survival) between recipients receiving kidneys from donors with no and at least one risk factors. In the adjusted analysis of subgroups of different risk factors, recipients of donors with “age over 60 years” at time of transplantation had a decreased transplant survival (p=0.014). Conclusion Thus, a careful expansion for selection criteria for living donors with critical evaluation could be possible, but especially the age of the donors could be a limited risk factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henning Plage
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Poline Pielka
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lutz Liefeldt
- Department of Nephrology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan Ebbing
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Urological University Clinic Basel-Liestal, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nesrin Sugünes
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kurt Miller
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hannes Cash
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anna Bichmann
- Department of Anaesthesia and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arne Sattler
- Department of General, Visceral- and Vascular Surgery, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katja Kotsch
- Department of General, Visceral- and Vascular Surgery, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Friedersdorff
- Department of Urology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Butler CR, Perkins JD, Johnson CK, Blosser CD, De Castro I, Leca N, Sibulesky L. Contemporary patterns in kidney graft survival from donors after circulatory death in the United States. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0233610. [PMID: 32469937 PMCID: PMC7259576 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplants from donors after circulatory death (DCD) make up an increasing proportion of all deceased donor kidney transplants in the United States (US). However, DCD grafts are considered to be of lower quality than kidneys from donors after brain death (DBD). It is unclear whether graft survival is different for these two types of donor kidneys. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of US deceased donor kidney recipients using data from the United Network of Organ Sharing from 12/4/2014 to 6/30/2018. We employed a Cox proportional hazard model with mixed effects to compare all-cause graft loss and death-censored graft loss for DCD versus DBD deceased donor kidney transplant recipients. We used transplant center as the random effects term to account for cluster-specific random effects. In the multivariable analysis, we adjusted for recipient characteristics, donor factors, and transplant logistics. RESULTS Our cohort included 27,494 DBD and 7,770 DCD graft recipients transplanted from 2014 to 2018 who were followed over a median of 1.92 years (IQR 1.08-2.83). For DCD compared with DBD recipients, we did not find a significant difference in all-cause graft loss (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.05 in univariable and HR 1.03 [95% CI 0.95-1.13] in multivariable analysis) or for death-censored graft loss (HR 0.97 (95% CI 0.91-1.06) in univariable and 1.05 (95% CI 0.99-1.11) in multivariable analysis). CONCLUSIONS For a contemporary cohort of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients, we did not find a difference in the likelihood of graft loss for DCD compared with DBD grafts. These findings signal a need for additional investigation into whether DCD status independently contributes to other important outcomes for current kidney transplant recipients and indices of graft quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine R. Butler
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - James D. Perkins
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Christopher K. Johnson
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, IL, United States of America
| | - Christopher D. Blosser
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Iris De Castro
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Nicolae Leca
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Lena Sibulesky
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hameed AM, Lu DB, Burns H, Byrne N, Chew YV, Julovi S, Ghimire K, Zanjani NT, P'ng CH, Meijles D, Dervish S, Matthews R, Miraziz R, O'Grady G, Yuen L, Pleass HC, Rogers NM, Hawthorne WJ. Pharmacologic targeting of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury using a normothermic machine perfusion platform. Sci Rep 2020; 10:6930. [PMID: 32332767 PMCID: PMC7181764 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63687-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) is an emerging modality for kidney preservation prior to transplantation. NMP may allow directed pharmacomodulation of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) without the need for systemic donor/recipient therapies. Three proven anti-IRI agents not in widespread clinical use, CD47-blocking antibody (αCD47Ab), soluble complement receptor 1 (sCR1), and recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM), were compared in a murine model of kidney IRI. The most effective agent was then utilized in a custom NMP circuit for the treatment of isolated porcine kidneys, ascertaining the impact of the drug on perfusion and IRI-related parameters. αCD47Ab conferred the greatest protection against IRI in mice after 24 hours. αCD47Ab was therefore chosen as the candidate agent for addition to the NMP circuit. CD47 receptor binding was demonstrated by immunofluorescence. Renal perfusion/flow improved with CD47 blockade, with a corresponding reduction in oxidative stress and histologic damage compared to untreated NMP kidneys. Tubular and glomerular functional parameters were not significantly impacted by αCD47Ab treatment during NMP. In a murine renal IRI model, αCD47Ab was confirmed as a superior anti-IRI agent compared to therapies targeting other pathways. NMP enabled effective, direct delivery of this drug to porcine kidneys, although further efficacy needs to be proven in the transplantation setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmer M Hameed
- Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - David B Lu
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Heather Burns
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicole Byrne
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Yi Vee Chew
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sohel Julovi
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kedar Ghimire
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Chow H P'ng
- Institute for Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Suat Dervish
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ross Matthews
- Department of Animal Care, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ray Miraziz
- Department of Anesthesia, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Greg O'Grady
- Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Lawrence Yuen
- Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Henry C Pleass
- Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Natasha M Rogers
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Department of Transplant/Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Wayne J Hawthorne
- Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kvietkauskas M, Leber B, Strupas K, Stiegler P, Schemmer P. Machine Perfusion of Extended Criteria Donor Organs: Immunological Aspects. Front Immunol 2020; 11:192. [PMID: 32180769 PMCID: PMC7057848 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to higher vulnerability and immunogenicity of extended criteria donor (ECD) organs used for organ transplantation (Tx), the discovery of new treatment strategies, involving tissue allorecognition pathways, is important. The implementation of machine perfusion (MP) led to improved estimation of the organ quality and introduced the possibility to achieve graft reconditioning prior to Tx. A significant number of experimental and clinical trials demonstrated increasing support for MP as a promising method of ECD organ preservation compared to classical static cold storage. MP reduced ischemia-reperfusion injury resulting in the protection from inadequate activation of innate immunity. However, there are no general agreements on MP protocols, and clinical application is limited. The objective of this comprehensive review is to summarize literature on immunological effects of MP of ECD organs based on experimental studies and clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mindaugas Kvietkauskas
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.,Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Bettina Leber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Philipp Stiegler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Peter Schemmer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
|
27
|
Chowdhary P, Kale S, Parashar A, Kute V, Sharma A, Agrawal S, Trivedi S, Khatkhedkar S. Case report of swap kidney transplantation in Chhattisgarh – Challenges and solution. INDIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION 2020. [DOI: 10.4103/ijot.ijot_74_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
28
|
van Sandwijk MS, Klooster A, ten Berge IJM, Diepstra A, Florquin S, Hoelbeek JJ, Bemelman FJ, Sanders JS. Complement activation and long-term graft function in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. World J Nephrol 2019; 8:95-108. [PMID: 31662955 PMCID: PMC6817790 DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v8.i6.95] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND ABO-incompatible and ABO-compatible kidney transplantation are equivalent in terms of short-term graft and patient survival. This is thought to be the result of ABO-incompatible graft accommodation, which occurs when anti-blood group antibodies re-occur after transplantation but somehow do not yield their detrimental effect. The underlying mechanism is unclear, but one of the hypotheses is that this is the result of complement inhibition. Since virtually all ABO-incompatible graft biopsies are C4d positive, this complement inhibition must occur somewhere in the complement cascade after the formation of C4d has already taken place, but where exactly is unclear. It is also unclear whether complement inhibition is complete. Incomplete accommodation could explain why recent studies have shown that long-term graft function in ABO-incompatible transplantation is somewhat inferior to ABO-compatible kidney transplantation.
AIM To unravel the relationship between pre-transplant anti-ABO antibodies, complement activation, and long-term graft function.
METHODS We included all 27 ABO-incompatible transplantations that were performed between 2008 and 2013 at the Academic Medical Center Amsterdam and the University Medical Center Groningen. For each ABO-incompatible transplantation, we included four ABO-compatible controls matched by age, sex, and transplantation date.
RESULTS Graft and patient survival were not significantly different. The slope of kidney function during five-year follow-up was also not significantly different, but ABO-incompatible recipients did have a lower kidney function at three months (creatinine clearance 58 vs 69 mL/min, P = 0.02, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 46 vs 52 mL/min/1.73 m2, P = 0.08), due to a high rate of early rejection (33% vs 15%, P = 0.03), mostly T-cell mediated. Pre-transplant anti-ABO IgG titers were positively correlated with C5b-9 staining, which itself was positively correlated with the occurrence of T-cell mediated rejection. This may be the result of concurrent C5a formation, which could function as a costimulatory signal for T-cell activation.
CONCLUSION Co-stimulation of T-cell activation by ongoing complement activation by anti-ABO antibodies may be responsible for an impaired long-term graft function in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit S van Sandwijk
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam NL-1105 AZ, Netherlands
- Dianet Dialysis Center, Amsterdam NL-1105 AZ, Netherlands
| | - Astrid Klooster
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen NL-9700 RB, Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Pathology Friesland, Leeuwarden NL-8917 EN, Netherlands
| | - Ineke JM ten Berge
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam NL-1105 AZ, Netherlands
| | - Arjan Diepstra
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen NL-9700 RB, Netherlands
| | - Sandrine Florquin
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam NL-1105 AZ, Netherlands
| | - Joris J Hoelbeek
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam NL-1105 AZ, Netherlands
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam NL-1105 AZ, Netherlands
| | - Jan-Stephan Sanders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen NL-9700 RB, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tafulo S, Malheiro J, Santos S, Dias L, Almeida M, Martins LS, Pedroso S, Mendes C, Lobato L, Castro-Henriques A. Degree of HLA class II eplet mismatch load improves prediction of antibody-mediated rejection in living donor kidney transplantation. Hum Immunol 2019; 80:966-975. [PMID: 31604581 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2019.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND HLA mismatching is a well known risk factor for worst outcomes in kidney transplantation. METHODS In the present study, HLA antigen and eplet mismatches were determined in 151 living donor-recipient pairs transplanted between 2007 and 2014 and rejection episodes and graft survival were evaluated. RESULTS We found that high HLA-II eplet mismatch load (EpMM ≥ 13, versus low EpMM ≤ 5), was an independent predictor of AMR (adjusted HR = 14.839; P = 0.011), while HLA-II AgMM was not. We also showed that HLA-II EpMM load was a significant better predictor of AMR than AgMM (c-statistic = 0.064; P = 0.023). After discriminating HLA-II into HLA-DR and HLA-DQ loci we demonstrated that high versus low eplet mismatch load for HLA-DR (T3 ≥ 6 versus T = 0-1, p = 0.013) and HLA-DQ (T3 ≥ 7 versus T = 0-1, p = 0.009) are independent predictors for AMR. HLA-II EpMM increased discrimination performance of the classical HLA-II AgMM risk model (IDI, 0.061, 95%CI: 0.005-0.195) for AMR. Compared with AgMM, HLA-II eplet model adequately reclassified 13 of 17 patients (76.5%) with AMR and 92 of 134 patients (68.7%) without AMR (cfNRI, 0.785, 95%CI: 0.300-1.426). CONCLUSIONS Our study evidences that eplet-based matching is a refinement of the classical HLA antigen mismatch analysis in LDKT and is a potential biomarker for personalized assessment of alloimmune risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Tafulo
- Blood and Transplantation Center of Porto, Portuguese Institute for Blood and Transplantation, Porto, Portugal; Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Jorge Malheiro
- Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Nephrology, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal
| | - Sofia Santos
- Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Nephrology, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal
| | - Leonídio Dias
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal
| | - Manuela Almeida
- Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Nephrology, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal
| | - La Salete Martins
- Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Nephrology, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal
| | - Sofia Pedroso
- Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Nephrology, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal
| | - Cecília Mendes
- Blood and Transplantation Center of Porto, Portuguese Institute for Blood and Transplantation, Porto, Portugal
| | - Luísa Lobato
- Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Nephrology, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal
| | - António Castro-Henriques
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dziodzio T, Jara M, Hardt J, Weiss S, Ritschl PV, Denecke C, Biebl M, Gerlach U, Reinke P, Pratschke J, Öllinger R. Effects of expanded allocation programmes and organ and recipient quality metrics on transplant‐related costs in kidney transplantation – an institutional analysis. Transpl Int 2019; 32:1074-1084. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.13463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Revised: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Dziodzio
- Department of Surgery Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow‐Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Maximilian Jara
- Department of Surgery Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow‐Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Juliane Hardt
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
- Clinical Research Unit Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| | - Sascha Weiss
- Department of Surgery Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow‐Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Paul Viktor Ritschl
- Department of Surgery Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow‐Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) Berlin Germany
| | - Christian Denecke
- Department of Surgery Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow‐Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Matthias Biebl
- Department of Surgery Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow‐Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Undine Gerlach
- Department of Surgery Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow‐Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Petra Reinke
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Medicine Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow‐Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow‐Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
|
32
|
Potential organ donors after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest during a ten-year period in Stockholm, Sweden. Resuscitation 2019; 137:215-220. [DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Revised: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
33
|
Fung SKS, Chau KF, Chow KM. Clinical practice guidelines for the provision of renal service in Hong Kong: Potential Kidney Transplant Recipient Wait-listing and Evaluation, Deceased Kidney Donor Evaluation, and Kidney Transplant Postoperative Care. Nephrology (Carlton) 2019; 24 Suppl 1:60-76. [PMID: 30900332 DOI: 10.1111/nep.13502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ka Foon Chau
- Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Kai Ming Chow
- Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Schütte-Nütgen K, Finke M, Ehlert S, Thölking G, Pavenstädt H, Suwelack B, Palmes D, Bahde R, Koch R, Reuter S. Expanding the donor pool in kidney transplantation: Should organs with acute kidney injury be accepted?-A retrospective study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0213608. [PMID: 30865677 PMCID: PMC6415810 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the gap between patients in need of a renal transplantation (RTx) and organs available, transplantation centers increasingly accept organs of suboptimal quality, e.g. from donors with acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS To determine the outcome of kidney transplants from deceased donors with AKI (defined as ≥ AKIN stage 1), all 107 patients who received a RTx from donors with AKI between August 2004 and July 2014 at our center were compared to their respective consecutively transplanted patients receiving kidneys from donors without AKI. 5-year patient and graft survival, frequencies of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejections and glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, CKD-EPI) were assessed. RESULTS Patient survival was similar in both groups, whereas death-censored and overall graft survival were decreased in AKI kidney recipients. AKI kidney recipients showed higher frequencies of DGF and had a reduced eGFR at 7 days, three months and one and three years after RTx. However, mortality was noticeably lower compared to waiting list candidates. Rejection-free survival was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS In our cohort, both short-term and long-term renal function was inferior in recipients of AKI kidneys, while patient survival was similar. Our data indicates that recipients of donor AKI kidneys should be carefully selected and additional factors impairing short- and long-term outcome should be minimized to prevent further deterioration of graft function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Schütte-Nütgen
- Department of Internal Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Markus Finke
- Department of Internal Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Sabrina Ehlert
- Department of Internal Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Gerold Thölking
- Department of Internal Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Hermann Pavenstädt
- Department of Internal Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Barbara Suwelack
- Department of Internal Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Daniel Palmes
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Ralf Bahde
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Raphael Koch
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Stefan Reuter
- Department of Internal Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ismail MS, Cusick M, Galvan NTN. The Benefits of a Local Kidney Exchange. Tex Heart Inst J 2019; 46:71-72. [PMID: 30833849 DOI: 10.14503/thij-18-6747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
36
|
Gregorini M, Martinelli V, Ticozzelli E, Canevari M, Fasoli G, Pattonieri EF, Erasmi F, Valente M, Esposito P, Contardi A, Grignano MA, Pietrabissa A, Abelli M, Rampino T. Living Kidney Donation Is Recipient Age Sensitive and Has a High Rate of Donor Organ Disqualifications. Transplant Proc 2019; 51:120-123. [PMID: 30655157 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Revised: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 03/15/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the best therapy for patients with chronic renal failure. Its advantages, compared with cadaveric transplantation, include the possibility of avoiding dialysis, the likelihood of best outcome, and donor pool expansion. Careful assessment of potential donors is important to minimize the risks and ensure success. However, the proportion of donors disqualified has been poorly investigated. The aim of this work is to describe our experience and present the main reasons for missed donation. METHODS This was a single-center, retrospective study of all potential donors and recipients evaluated for LDKT between January 2008 and December 2017. RESULTS During the period of study, 81 donor-recipient pairs were evaluated. Of these, 45.7% were disqualified and 37 LDKTs were carried out. LDKT was the first choice in 68% of cases and preemptive in 20%; 60% of transplants were among family members. Sex distribution revealed a prevalence of females in the donor group (69%) and males in the recipient group (70%). The mean living donor age was 53 ± 9.5 years; the mean recipient age was lower in recipients listed in the living transplant program than those listed for cadaver transplantation (45.8 ± 13.4 vs 54.2 ± 11.08; P < .0001). Reasons for denial included hypertension (18.9%), deceased donor transplant performed during the study period (16.2%), urologic pathology (13.5%), incompatibility (13.5%), withdrawal of consent by donor or recipient (13.5%), psychological unsuitability (8.1%), donor cancer (5.4%), and reduced renal clearance (2.7%). CONCLUSION LDKT is considered an option especially for younger recipients. Of the potential kidney living donors, 45.7% were disqualified during the evaluation, with medical reasons being the primary cause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Gregorini
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - V Martinelli
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - E Ticozzelli
- Unit of General Surgery 2, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
| | - M Canevari
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - G Fasoli
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - E F Pattonieri
- Experimental Medicine Doctorate, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - F Erasmi
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - M Valente
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - P Esposito
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - A Contardi
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - M A Grignano
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - A Pietrabissa
- Unit of General Surgery 2, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - M Abelli
- Renal Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - T Rampino
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Laparoscopic procurement of single versus multiple artery kidney allografts: Meta-analysis of comparative studies. Asian J Surg 2019; 42:61-70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2018] [Revised: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
|
38
|
Long-term Outcomes after Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis Surgery. Ann Vasc Surg 2019; 54:261-268. [DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.05.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Revised: 05/12/2018] [Accepted: 05/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
39
|
Li DY, Liu WT, Wang GY, Shi XJ. Impact of combined ischemic preconditioning and remote ischemic perconditioning on ischemia-reperfusion injury after liver transplantation. Sci Rep 2018; 8:17979. [PMID: 30568237 PMCID: PMC6299280 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36365-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and remote ischemic perconditioning (RIPer) confer protective effects against liver ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), but data about RIPer applying in liver transplantation is lacking. The study aimed to evaluate whether the combination of IPC and RIPer provides reinforced protective effects. C57BL/6 mice (160 pairs) were allocated into four groups: control, subjected to liver transplantation only; IPC, donor hilar was clamped for 10 min followed by 15 min of reperfusion; RIPer, three cycles of occlusion (5 min) and opening (5 min) of femoral vascular bundle were performed before reperfusion; IPC + RIPer, donors and recipients were subjected to IPC and RIPer respectively. Liver tissues were obtained for histological evaluation, TUNEL staining, malondialdehyde assays, GSH-Px assays, and NF-κB p65 protein and Bcl-2/Bax mRNA analyses. Blood samples were used to evaluate ALT, AST, TNF-α, NOx levels and flow cytometry. We found that protective efficacy of RIPer is less than IPC in terms of ALT, TNF-α, GSH-Px and NOx at 2 h postoperation, but almost equivalent at 24 h and 72 h postoperation. Except for Suzuki scores, ALT, Bcl-2/Bax mRNA ratio, other indices showed that combined treatment brought enhanced attenuation in IRI, compared with single treatment, through additive effects on antioxidation, anti-apoptosis, modulation of microcirculation disturbance, and inhibition of innate immune response. This study suggested a combined strategy that could enhance protection against IRI in clinical liver transplantation, otherwise, provided a hint that RIPer's mechanism might be partly or totally different from IPC in humoral pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ding-Yang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, Henan Province, China
| | - Wen-Tao Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, Henan Province, China
| | - Guang-Yi Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, The First Norman Bethune Hospital Affiliated to Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, Jilin Province, China
| | - Xiao-Ju Shi
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, The First Norman Bethune Hospital Affiliated to Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, Jilin Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Habbous S, McArthur E, Sarma S, Begen MA, Lam NN, Manns B, Lentine KL, Dipchand C, Litchfield K, McKenzie S, Garg AX. Potential implications of a more timely living kidney donor evaluation. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:2719-2729. [PMID: 29575655 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Revised: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 03/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Living donor kidney transplantation is the most promising way to avoid or minimize the amount of time a recipient spends on dialysis before transplantation. We studied 887 living kidney donors at 5 transplant centers in Ontario, Canada, who started their evaluation and donated between April 2006 and March 2014. Using a series of hypothetical scenarios, we estimated the impact of an earlier living donor evaluation completion and donation on the number pre-emptive transplants, the time spent on dialysis, healthcare cost savings from averted dialysis costs (CAD $2016), and the number of additional transplants. During the study period, if the donor transplants occurred 3 months earlier, the healthcare system would save on average $12 055 (standard deviation [SD] $13 594) per recipient; 21 recipients could have avoided dialysis altogether, and 57 additional transplants (a 26% increase) could have occurred each year. For the 220 living kidney donor transplants performed in Ontario, Canada, each year, this translates to a total annual cost savings of $2.7M. In conclusion, a more timely evaluation of living donor candidates and their intended recipients may increase the supply of kidneys for transplantation. Improved evaluation efficiency may also yield more pre-emptive transplants and substantial healthcare cost savings through averted dialysis costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Habbous
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Eric McArthur
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sisira Sarma
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Mehmet A Begen
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Ivey School of Business, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ngan N Lam
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Braden Manns
- Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Kenneth Litchfield
- Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease (CAN-SOLVE CKD) patient council, London, ON, Canada
| | - Susan McKenzie
- Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease (CAN-SOLVE CKD) patient council, London, ON, Canada.,Kidney Foundation of Canada, London, ON, Canada
| | - Amit X Garg
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Dzobo K, Thomford NE, Senthebane DA, Shipanga H, Rowe A, Dandara C, Pillay M, Motaung KSCM. Advances in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering: Innovation and Transformation of Medicine. Stem Cells Int 2018; 2018:2495848. [PMID: 30154861 PMCID: PMC6091336 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2495848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 195] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Revised: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Humans and animals lose tissues and organs due to congenital defects, trauma, and diseases. The human body has a low regenerative potential as opposed to the urodele amphibians commonly referred to as salamanders. Globally, millions of people would benefit immensely if tissues and organs can be replaced on demand. Traditionally, transplantation of intact tissues and organs has been the bedrock to replace damaged and diseased parts of the body. The sole reliance on transplantation has created a waiting list of people requiring donated tissues and organs, and generally, supply cannot meet the demand. The total cost to society in terms of caring for patients with failing organs and debilitating diseases is enormous. Scientists and clinicians, motivated by the need to develop safe and reliable sources of tissues and organs, have been improving therapies and technologies that can regenerate tissues and in some cases create new tissues altogether. Tissue engineering and/or regenerative medicine are fields of life science employing both engineering and biological principles to create new tissues and organs and to promote the regeneration of damaged or diseased tissues and organs. Major advances and innovations are being made in the fields of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine and have a huge impact on three-dimensional bioprinting (3D bioprinting) of tissues and organs. 3D bioprinting holds great promise for artificial tissue and organ bioprinting, thereby revolutionizing the field of regenerative medicine. This review discusses how recent advances in the field of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering can improve 3D bioprinting and vice versa. Several challenges must be overcome in the application of 3D bioprinting before this disruptive technology is widely used to create organotypic constructs for regenerative medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Dzobo
- Cape Town Component, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and UCT Medical Campus, Wernher and Beit Building (South), Anzio Road, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa
- Division of Medical Biochemistry and Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Nicholas Ekow Thomford
- Pharmacogenetics Research Group, Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology and Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Dimakatso Alice Senthebane
- Cape Town Component, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and UCT Medical Campus, Wernher and Beit Building (South), Anzio Road, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa
- Division of Medical Biochemistry and Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Hendrina Shipanga
- Cape Town Component, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and UCT Medical Campus, Wernher and Beit Building (South), Anzio Road, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa
- Division of Medical Biochemistry and Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Arielle Rowe
- Cape Town Component, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) and UCT Medical Campus, Wernher and Beit Building (South), Anzio Road, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Collet Dandara
- Pharmacogenetics Research Group, Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology and Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Michael Pillay
- Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied and Computer Sciences, Vaal University of Technology, Vanderbijlpark 1900, South Africa
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Weber S, Dienemann T, Jacobi J, Eckardt KU, Weidemann A. Delayed graft function is associated with an increased rate of renal allograft rejection: A retrospective single center analysis. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0199445. [PMID: 29928026 PMCID: PMC6013231 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The association of delayed graft function (DGF) and biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) of renal allografts is controversial. Borderline rejections comprise a major portion of biopsy results but the significance of such histologic changes is debated. The present study explores the impact of DGF on BPAR with a special emphasis on discriminating the effects of borderline rejection. METHODS Single center analysis of 417 deceased donor kidney recipients (age>18; transplantation date 1/2008-2/2015). Patients with primary non-function were excluded. DGF was defined as the need for dialysis within the first week after transplantation. Acute rejection was defined according to Banff criteria. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the relationship of DGF with BPAR within the first year. RESULTS No graft loss was observed during the first year after transplantation. DGF significantly associated with BPAR in the first year, irrespective of whether borderline rejections were included (HR 1.71, 95%CI 1.16,2.53) or excluded (HR 1.79, 95%CI 1.13,2.84). CONCLUSION DGF is significantly associated with rejection-with or without borderline changes-within the first year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Weber
- Medizinische Klinik 4, Nephrologie und Hypertensiologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thomas Dienemann
- Medizinische Klinik 4, Nephrologie und Hypertensiologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Johannes Jacobi
- Medizinische Klinik 4, Nephrologie und Hypertensiologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Kai-Uwe Eckardt
- Medizinische Klinik, Nephrologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Weidemann
- Medizinische Klinik 4, Nephrologie und Hypertensiologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Medizinische Klinik 1, Nephrologie, Transplantation und internistische Intensivmedizin, Krankenhaus Köln Merheim, Klinikum der Universität Witten-Herdecke, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Osickova K, Parikova A, Maluskova J, Fronek J, Viklicky O. Similar Microvascular Inflammation and Tubulointerstitial Injury in ABO-Incompatible and Matched ABO-Compatible Kidney Allografts. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:1305-1309. [PMID: 29880350 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Revised: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation represents a viable tool to increase the donor pool for kidney transplantation, however, increased alloimmune response has been debated. The early outcomes of 25 low-risk ABOi kidney transplant recipients were compared with thoroughly matched 50 ABO-compatible (ABOc) ones. The matching process was based on gender and age of recipients and immunologic parameters, such as panel reactive antibodies, number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches, and transplantation era. Three-month protocol kidney graft biopsy Banff scores and 1-year clinical outcomes were compared. Apart from C4d positivity, no statistically significant differences were found regarding the Banff scores between the two groups. Similarly, microvascular inflammation and tubulointerstitial injury revealed no differences either. The eGFR at 3 months and 1 year was similar in both groups. In conclusion, blood group incompatibility yields no additional microvascular and tubulointerstitial graft injury if desensitization protocol was applied to low-risk kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Osickova
- Department of Nephrology, Transplant Center, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - A Parikova
- Department of Nephrology, Transplant Center, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J Maluskova
- Department of Clinical and Transplant Pathology, Transplant Center, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J Fronek
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Transplant Center, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - O Viklicky
- Department of Nephrology, Transplant Center, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Late Steroid Withdrawal Following AB0-Incompatible Renal Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:72-78. [PMID: 29407335 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current evidence on steroid withdrawal following AB0-incompatible (AB0i) renal transplantation is low. We compared clinical outcomes of patients who agreed to late steroid withdrawal and patients who remained on steroid treatment. METHODS Steroid withdrawal was carried out in 11 patients at ≥12 months after transplantation (group W). For comparison, we analyzed 19 patients who remained on triple immunosuppression including steroids (group M). Minimum follow-up was 24 months following transplantation and 12 months after steroid withdrawal. RESULTS Baseline characteristics, including observation times, were not different between groups W and M. Graft survival was 100% in group W compared with 84% (16/19) in group M (P = .15). In group M, 1 patient experienced graft failure because of suspected antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) following temporary cessation of mycophenolate treatment after a diagnosis of cryptococcal pneumonia. Two patients died with functioning graft because of sepsis. In group W, we observed 1 episode of ABMR following steroid withdrawal. At the end of follow-up, estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) were 54 (19-91) versus 60 (15-85) mL/min/1.73 m2 in group W versus M, respectively (P = .67). CONCLUSIONS Late steroid withdrawal following AB0i transplantation is feasible at a moderate risk of rejection. We recommend close monitoring of renal function and HLA antibodies during and after steroid withdrawal. On the other hand, the occurrence of severe infections causing death and graft loss in patients on triple maintenance immunosuppression including steroids should remind us to consider the overall immunosuppressive burden.
Collapse
|
45
|
Nizam N, Mazhar F, Abbas K, Aziz T, Zafar MN, Mohsin R, Ali B, Shahzad A, Imran M, Rizvi SAH. Kidney Swap in Pakistan: Experience at the Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2017; 15:76-78. [PMID: 28260439 DOI: 10.6002/ect.mesot2016.o63] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Kidney paired exchange is an established method of overcoming incompatibility in donor-recipient pairs and expanding the living-donor pool. It is infrequently performed in developing countries. We report the first kidney paired exchange in Pakistan, successfully performed at our center. One donor-recipient pair consisted of a 38-year-old female recipient (blood type, B positive) and her 40-year-old husband (A positive) as the potential donor. The second pair consisted of a 30-year-old male recipient (A positive) and his 30-year-old wife (B positive) as the potential donor. The donors were exchanged with the recipients, and both pairs were antigen matched for human leukocyte antigen A and human leukocyte antigen DR. Luminex antibody screening was negative, as were the crossmatches for T and B cells and for IgG and IgM. The transplant procedures and recoveries proceeded uneventfully. The recipients are maintaining serum creatinine levels around 0.78 mg/dL and 0.90 mg/dL, 1 year after transplant. Kidney paired exchange is a relatively low-cost option for overcoming the barrier of incompatibility in a resource-constrained setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveeda Nizam
- Department of Medical Social Welfare, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Giwa S, Lewis JK, Alvarez L, Langer R, Roth AE, Church GM, Markmann JF, Sachs DH, Chandraker A, Wertheim JA, Rothblatt M, Boyden ES, Eidbo E, Lee WPA, Pomahac B, Brandacher G, Weinstock DM, Elliott G, Nelson D, Acker JP, Uygun K, Schmalz B, Weegman BP, Tocchio A, Fahy GM, Storey KB, Rubinsky B, Bischof J, Elliott JAW, Woodruff TK, Morris GJ, Demirci U, Brockbank KGM, Woods EJ, Ben RN, Baust JG, Gao D, Fuller B, Rabin Y, Kravitz DC, Taylor MJ, Toner M. The promise of organ and tissue preservation to transform medicine. Nat Biotechnol 2017; 35:530-542. [PMID: 28591112 PMCID: PMC5724041 DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 298] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 04/28/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The ability to replace organs and tissues on demand could save or improve millions of lives each year globally and create public health benefits on par with curing cancer. Unmet needs for organ and tissue preservation place enormous logistical limitations on transplantation, regenerative medicine, drug discovery, and a variety of rapidly advancing areas spanning biomedicine. A growing coalition of researchers, clinicians, advocacy organizations, academic institutions, and other stakeholders has assembled to address the unmet need for preservation advances, outlining remaining challenges and identifying areas of underinvestment and untapped opportunities. Meanwhile, recent discoveries provide proofs of principle for breakthroughs in a family of research areas surrounding biopreservation. These developments indicate that a new paradigm, integrating multiple existing preservation approaches and new technologies that have flourished in the past 10 years, could transform preservation research. Capitalizing on these opportunities will require engagement across many research areas and stakeholder groups. A coordinated effort is needed to expedite preservation advances that can transform several areas of medicine and medical science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Giwa
- Organ Preservation Alliance, NASA Research Park, Moffett Field, California, USA
- Sylvatica Biotech, Inc., Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Ossium Health, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jedediah K Lewis
- Organ Preservation Alliance, NASA Research Park, Moffett Field, California, USA
| | - Luis Alvarez
- Regenerative Biology Research Group, Cancer and Developmental Biology Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Department of Chemistry and Life Science, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York, USA
| | - Robert Langer
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alvin E Roth
- Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - George M Church
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James F Markmann
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David H Sachs
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anil Chandraker
- American Society of Transplantation, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, USA
- Transplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jason A Wertheim
- American Society of Transplant Surgeons, Arlington Virginia, USA
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Edward S Boyden
- MIT Media Lab and McGovern Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elling Eidbo
- Association of Organ Procurement Organizations, Vienna, Virginia, USA
| | - W P Andrew Lee
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Bohdan Pomahac
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gerald Brandacher
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - David M Weinstock
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gloria Elliott
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - David Nelson
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Nazih Zuhdi Transplant Institute, Integris Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Jason P Acker
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Society for Cryobiology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Korkut Uygun
- Department of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Boris Schmalz
- Organ Preservation Alliance, NASA Research Park, Moffett Field, California, USA
- Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany
| | - Brad P Weegman
- Organ Preservation Alliance, NASA Research Park, Moffett Field, California, USA
- Sylvatica Biotech, Inc., Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Alessandro Tocchio
- Organ Preservation Alliance, NASA Research Park, Moffett Field, California, USA
- Department of Radiology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Greg M Fahy
- 21st Century Medicine, Fontana, California, USA
| | - Kenneth B Storey
- Institute of Biochemistry, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Boris Rubinsky
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - John Bischof
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Janet A W Elliott
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Teresa K Woodruff
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology-Reproductive Science in Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Utkan Demirci
- Department of Radiology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering (by courtesy), Stanford, California, USA
| | | | - Erik J Woods
- Ossium Health, San Francisco, California, USA
- Society for Cryobiology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Robert N Ben
- Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - John G Baust
- Department of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, State University of New York, Binghamton, New York, USA
| | - Dayong Gao
- Society for Cryobiology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Barry Fuller
- Division of Surgery &Interventional Science, University College Medical School, Royal Free Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Yoed Rabin
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Michael J Taylor
- Sylvatica Biotech, Inc., Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Mehmet Toner
- Department of Surgery, Center for Engineering in Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Peters-Sengers H, Homan van der Heide JJ, Heemskerk MBA, ten Berge IJM, Ultee FCW, Idu MM, Betjes MGH, van Zuilen AD, Christiaans MHL, Hilbrands LH, de Vries APJ, Nurmohamed AS, Berger SP, Bemelman FJ. Similar 5-Year Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Between Kidney Transplants From Uncontrolled and Controlled Donors After Circulatory Death-A Dutch Cohort Study. Transplantation 2017; 101:1144-1151. [PMID: 27257998 PMCID: PMC5441890 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Accepted: 02/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Organ shortage persists despite a high rate of donation after circulatory death (DCD) in the Netherlands. The median waiting time for a deceased donor kidney in 2013 was 3.5 years. Most DCD kidneys are from controlled DCD (cDCD; Maastricht category III). Experience with uncontrolled donors after cardiac death (uDCD), that is, donors with an unexpected and irreversible cardiac arrest (Maastricht categories I and II), is increasing; and its effect on transplant outcomes needs evaluation. METHODS We used the Dutch Organ Transplantation Registry to include recipients (≥18 years old) from all Dutch centers who received transplants from 2002 to 2012 with a first DCD kidney. We compared transplant outcome in uDCD (n = 97) and cDCD (n = 1441). RESULTS Primary nonfunction in uDCD was higher than in the cDCD (19.6% vs 9.6%, P < 0.001, respectively). Delayed graft function was also higher in uDCD than in cDCD, but not significantly (73.7% vs 63.3%, P = .074, respectively). If censored for primary nonfunction, estimated glomerular filtration rates after 1 year and 5 years were comparable between uDCD and cDCD (1 year: uDCD, 44.3 (23.4) mL/min/m and cDCD, 45.8 (24.1) mL/min/m; P = 0.621; 5 years: uDCD, 49.1 (25.6) mL/min/m and cDCD, 47.7 (21.7) mL/min/m; P = 0.686). The differences in primary nonfunction between kidneys from uDCD and cDCD were explained by differences in the first warm ischemic period, cold ischemic time, and donor age. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that uDCD kidneys have potential for excellent function and can constitute a valuable extension of the donor pool. However, further efforts are necessary to address the high rate of primary nonfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Fred C. W. Ultee
- Department of Nephrology, Academic Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Mirza M. Idu
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel G. H. Betjes
- Department of Nephrology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arjan D. van Zuilen
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Luuk H. Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Stefan P. Berger
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Continuous Normothermic Ex Vivo Kidney Perfusion Improves Graft Function in Donation After Circulatory Death Pig Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation 2017; 101:754-763. [PMID: 27467537 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is current clinical practice to increase the donor pool. Deleterious effects on renal graft function are described for hypothermic preservation. Therefore, current research focuses on investigating alternative preservation techniques, such as normothermic perfusion. METHODS We compared continuous pressure-controlled normothermic ex vivo kidney perfusion (NEVKP) with static cold storage (SCS) in a porcine model of DCD autotransplantation. After 30 minutes of warm ischemia, right kidneys were removed from 30-kg Yorkshire pigs and preserved with 8-hour NEVKP or in 4°C histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (SCS), followed by kidney autotransplantation. RESULTS Throughout NEVKP, electrolytes and pH values were maintained. Intrarenal resistance decreased over the course of perfusion (0 hour, 1.6 ± 0.51 mm per minute vs 7 hours, 0.34 ± 0.05 mm Hg/mL per minute, P = 0.005). Perfusate lactate concentration also decreased (0 hour, 10.5 ± 0.8 vs 7 hours, 1.4 ± 0.3 mmol/L, P < 0.001). Cellular injury markers lactate dehydrogenase and aspartate aminotransferase were persistently low (lactate dehydrogenase < 100 U/L, below analyzer range; aspartate aminotransferase 0 hour, 15.6 ± 9.3 U/L vs 7 hours, 24.8 ± 14.6 U/L, P = 0.298). After autotransplantation, renal grafts preserved with NEVKP demonstrated lower serum creatinine on days 1 to 7 (P < 0.05) and lower peak values (NEVKP, 5.5 ± 1.7 mg/dL vs SCS, 11.1 ± 2.1 mg/dL, P = 0.002). The creatinine clearance on day 4 was increased in NEVKP-preserved kidneys (NEVKP, 39 ± 6.4 vs SCS, 18 ± 10.6 mL/min; P = 0.012). Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin at day 3 was lower in the NEVKP group (1267 ± 372 vs 2697 ± 1145 ng/mL, P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS Continuous pressure-controlled NEVKP improves renal function in DCD kidney transplantation. Normothermic ex vivo kidney perfusion might help to decrease posttransplant delayed graft function rates and to increase the donor pool.
Collapse
|
49
|
Böhmig GA, Fronek J, Slavcev A, Fischer GF, Berlakovich G, Viklicky O. Czech-Austrian kidney paired donation: first European cross-border living donor kidney exchange. Transpl Int 2017; 30:638-639. [PMID: 28236641 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Georg A Böhmig
- Department of Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jiří Fronek
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Antonij Slavcev
- Department of Immunogenetics, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Gottfried F Fischer
- Department for Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Ondrej Viklicky
- Department of Nephrology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abderrahim E, Zammouri A, Bacha MM, Ounissi M, Gargah T, Hedri H, Ben Slama R, Bardi R, Chebil M, Ben Abdallah T. Thirty Years of Experience at the First Tunisian Kidney Transplant Center. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2017; 15:84-89. [PMID: 28260441 DOI: 10.6002/ect.mesot2016.o66] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to report the results of 30 years of experience at the first kidney transplant center in Tunisia. MATERIALS AND METHODS All kidney transplants performed at the center between June 1986 and June 2016 were included. The study period was divided into 3 decades. Recipient and donor data and follow-up information were obtained from a local database and patient medical records. Comparative analyses were performed using the t test for continuous variables and the Χ² test for qualitative variables. Patient and graft survival rates were calculated according to the actuarial method, and comparison of survival curves was performed according to the logrank test. RESULTS The mean age of recipients was 32.7 ± 11.5 years (range, 6-65 y) with a gender ratio of 2.2. Duration of prekidney transplant dialysis varied from 2 months to 20 years (median, 27.5 mo); 1.7% of patients underwent transplant preemptively. Kidneys were recovered from deceased donors in 21.2% of cases and from living donors in 78.8%. The proportion of deceased donors dropped from 27.4% during the period 2006-2010 to 12.9% during the period 2011-2015 (P < .04). Patient survival rates at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years were 96%, 89.3%, 79.5%, 71.1%, and 65.4%. Graft survival rates were 95%, 86.5%, 76.2%, 66.3%, and 57.2%. The annual graft loss was 2.9%, with a mortality rate of 2.4% and without significant differences between patients receiving deceased-donor and living-donor organs. CONCLUSIONS Kidney transplant activity remains suboptimal in our country. The reduction in deceased-donor organs could be related to the political transformations facing our country with their resulting social and economic consequences. Efforts should be made to increase governmental resources and to improve both public awareness of organ donation and the motivation of transplant teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ezzedine Abderrahim
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Medicine, University Tunis El Manar, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|