Lower cardiovascular mortality with high-volume hemodiafiltration: a cool effect?

Hemodiafiltration: a synergy yet to be convincing

The desperate attempt to improve mortality, morbidity, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in patients on hemodialysis has led to multiple attempts to improve the different modes, frequencies, and durations of dialysis sessions in the last few decades. Nothing has been more appealing than the combination of diffusion and convection in the form of hemodiafiltration. Despite the concrete evidence of better clearance of middle weight molecules and better hemodynamic stability, tangible evidence to support the universal adoption is still at a distance. Survival benefits seen in selected groups who are likely to tolerate hemodiafiltration with better vascular access and with lower comorbid burden, need to be extended to real life dialysis patients who are older than the population studied and have significantly higher comorbid burden. Technical demands of initiation hemodiafiltration, the associated costs, and the incremental benefits targeted, along with patient-reported outcomes, need to be explored further before recommending hemodiafiltration as the mode of choice.

Unveiling the Clinical Benefits of High-Volume Hemodiafiltration: Optimizing the Removal of Medium-Weight Uremic Toxins and Beyond

Dialysis treatment has improved the survival of patients with kidney failure. However, the hospitalization and mortality rates remain alarmingly high, primarily due to incomplete uremic toxin elimination. High-volume hemodiafiltration (HDF) has emerged as a promising approach that significantly improves patient outcomes by effectively eliminating medium and large uremic toxins, which explains its increasing adoption, particularly in Europe and Japan. Interest in this therapy has grown following the findings of the recently published CONVINCE study, as well as the need to understand the mechanisms behind the benefits. This comprehensive review aims to enhance the scientific understanding by explaining the underlying physiological mechanisms that contribute to the positive effects of HDF in terms of short-term benefits, like hemodynamic tolerance and cardiovascular disease. Additionally, it explores the rationale behind the medium-term clinical benefits, including phosphorus removal, the modulation of inflammation and oxidative stress, anemia management, immune response modulation, nutritional effects, the mitigation of bone disorders, neuropathy relief, and amyloidosis reduction. This review also analyzes the impact of HDF on patient-reported outcomes and mortality. Considering the importance of applying personalized uremic toxin removal strategies tailored to the unique needs of each patient, high-volume HDF appears to be the most effective treatment to date for patients with renal failure. This justifies the need to prioritize its application in clinical practice, initially focusing on the groups with the greatest potential benefits and subsequently extending its use to a larger number of patients.

Hemodiafiltration: Technical and Medical Insights

Despite the significant medical and technical improvements in the field of dialytic renal replacement modalities, morbidity and mortality are excessively high among patients with end-stage kidney disease, and most interventional studies yielded disappointing results. Hemodiafiltration, a dialysis method that was implemented in clinics many years ago and that combines the two main principles of hemodialysis and hemofiltration-diffusion and convection-has had a positive impact on mortality rates, especially when delivered in a high-volume mode as a surrogate for a high convective dose. The achievement of high substitution volumes during dialysis treatments does not only depend on patient characteristics but also on the dialyzer (membrane) and the adequately equipped hemodiafiltration machine. The present review article summarizes the technical aspects of online hemodiafiltration and discusses present and ongoing clinical studies with regards to hard clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

High-Volume Hemodiafiltration and Cool Hemodialysis Have a Beneficial Effect on Intradialytic Hemodynamics: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial of Four Intermittent Dialysis Strategies

Introduction

Compared to standard hemodialysis (S-HD), postdilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) has been associated with improved survival.

Methods

To assess whether intradialytic hemodynamics may play a role in this respect, 40 chronic dialysis patients were cross-over randomized to S-HD (dialysate temperature [Td] 36.5 °C), cooled HD (C-HD; Td 35.5 °C), and HDF (low-volume [LV-HDF)] and high-volume [HV-HDF], both Td 36.5 °C, convection volume 15 liters, and at least 23 liters per session, respectively), each for 2 weeks. Blood pressure (BP) was measured every 15 minutes. The primary endpoint was the number of intradialytic hypotensive (IDH) episodes per session. IDH was defined as systolic BP (SBP) less than 90 mmHg for predialysis SBP less than 160 mmHg and less than 100 mmHg for predialysis SBP greater than or equal to 160 mmHg, independent of symptoms and interventions. A post hoc analysis on early-onset IDH was performed as well. Secondary endpoints included intradialytic courses of SBP, diastolic BP (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP).

Results

During S-HD, IDH occurred 0.68 episodes per session, which was 3.2 and 2.5 times higher than during C-HD (0.21 per session, P < 0.0005) and HV-HDF (0.27 per session, P < 0.0005), respectively. Whereas the latter 2 strategies showed similar frequencies, HV-HDF differed significantly from LV-HDF (P = 0.02). A comparable trend was observed for early-onset IDH: S-HD (0.32 per session), C-HD (0.07 per session, P < 0.0005) and HV-HDF (0.10 per session, P = 0.001). SBP, DBP, and MAP declined during S-HD (−6.8, −5.2, −5.2 mmHg per session; P = 0.004, P < 0.0005, P = 0.002 respectively), which was markedly different from C-HD (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Though C-HD and HV-HDF showed the lowest IDH frequency and the best intradialytic hemodynamic stability, all parameters were most disrupted in S-HD. Therefore, the survival benefit of HV-HDF over S-HD may be partly caused by a more beneficial intradialytic BP profile.

Hemodiafiltration outcomes in special situations

This Seminars in Dialysis Hemodiafiltration Symposium includes many references regarding the outcomes of this modality in general. The results in special populations are included in some of the studies, but have not been compared in a systematic manner. The purpose of this review is to compile those outcome results in select populations.

CONVINCE in the context of existing evidence on haemodiafiltration

Haemodiafiltration (HDF) provides a greater removal of larger solutes and protein-bound compounds than conventional high-flux haemodialysis (HD). There are indications that the patients receiving the highest convection volumes of HDF result in an improved survival compared with HD. However, the comparative efficacy of HDF vs HD remains unproven. Here we provide a comparative account of the methodology and aims of ‘the comparison of high-dose HDF with high-flux HD’ (CONVINCE) study in the context of the totality of evidence and how this study will contribute to reaching a higher level of certainty regarding the comparative efficacy of HDF vs HD in people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).

Effect of various dialysis modalities on intradialytic hemodynamics, tissue injury and patient discomfort in chronic dialysis patients: design of a randomized cross-over study (HOLLANT)

BACKGROUND

From a recent meta-analysis it appeared that online post-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF), especially with a high convection volume (HV-HDF), is associated with superior overall and cardiovascular survival, if compared to standard hemodialysis (HD). The mechanism(s) behind this effect, however, is (are) still unclear. In this respect, a lower incidence of intradialytic hypotension (IDH), and hence less tissue injury, may play a role. To address these items, the HOLLANT study was designed.

METHODS

HOLLANT is a Dutch multicentre randomized controlled cross-over trial. In total, 40 prevalent dialysis patients will be included and, after a run-in phase, exposed to standard HD, HD with cooled dialysate, low-volume HDF and high-volume HDF (Dialog iQ® machine) in a randomized fashion. The primary endpoint is an intradialytic nadir in systolic blood pressure (SBP) of < 90 and < 100 mmHg for patients with predialysis SBP < 159 and ≥ 160 mmHg, respectively. The main secondary outcomes are 1) intradialytic left ventricle (LV) chamber quantification and deformation, 2) intradialytic hemodynamic profile of SBP, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse pressure (PP), 3) organ and tissue damage, such as the release of specific cellular components, and 4) patient reported symptoms and thermal perceptions during each modality.

DISCUSSION

The current trial is primarily designed to test the hypothesis that a lower incidence of intradialytic hypotension contributes to the superior survival of (HV)-HDF. A secondary objective of this investigation is the question whether changes in the intradialytic blood pressure profile correlate with organ dysfunction and tissue damage, and/or patient discomfort.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered Report Identifier: NCT03249532 # ( ClinicalTrials.gov ). Date of registration: 2017/08/15.

Renal Replacement Modality Affects Uremic Toxins and Oxidative Stress

Nowadays, the high prevalence of kidney diseases and their related complications, including endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease, represents one of the leading causes of death in patients with chronic kidney diseases. Renal failure leads to accumulation of uremic toxins, which are the main cause of oxidative stress development. The renal replacement therapy appears to be the best way to lower uremic toxin levels in patients with end-stage renal disease and reduce oxidative stress. At this moment, despite the increasing number of recognized toxins and their mechanisms of action, it is impossible to determine which of them are the most important and which cause the greatest complications. There are many different types of renal replacement therapy, but the best treatment has not been identified yet. Patients treated with diffusion methods have satisfactory clearance of small molecules, but the clearance of medium molecules appears to be insufficient, but treatment with convection methods cleans medium molecules better than small molecules. Hence, there is an urgent need of new more validated, appropriate, and reliable information not only on toxins and their role in metabolic disorders, including oxidative stress, but also on the best artificial renal replacement therapy to reduce complications and prolong the life of patients with chronic kidney disease.

[Is the N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide a predictor of cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients?]

Aim To evaluate the role of N-terminal pro-hormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) as a predictor of cardiovascular events (CVE) in patients receiving programmed hemodialysis (PHD).Material and methods This study included 74 patients (men, 64.8 %) older than 18 years receiving PHD. Data were processed using mean values of standard biochemical indexes for 16 months. NT-proBNP level was measured and transthoracic echocardiography (EchoCG) and bioimpedancemetry were performed at the time of inclusion into the study. Cumulative incidence of CVE for 16 months was evaluated in patients with different levels of NT-proBNP (quartile 1: &lt;1127 pg/ml; quartile 1-4: 1127-3210 pg/ml; quartile 4: &gt;3210 pg/ml) using the Kaplan-Meier method. For assessment of NT-proBNP as a CVE predictor, receiver operational characteristic curves (ROC curves) were constructed.Results The serum concentration of NT-proBNP was 2114.5 [1127; 3210.4] pg/ml. During 16 months, CVE were observed in 25.6 % of patients. The risk of CVE increased with increasing NT-proBNP quartile in the analysis of Kaplan-Meier curves (Log-Rank test, p=0.032). In this process, CVE did not develop in patients with NT-proBNP concentrations lower than 1127 pg/ml. The ROC analysis demonstrated a good predictive value of NT-proBNP (p=0.006, AUC 0.71, 95 % CI: 0.59-0.83). The optimum cut-off threshold of the NT-proBNP level predictive of CVE was 2093 pg/ml (sensitivity, 84.2 %, specificity, 58.2 %). CVE developed in patients with greater values of volumetric myocardial parameters, indirect signs of hyperhydration (higher predialysis sodium level and pulmonary artery systolic pressure), smaller volumes of substituate per dialysis procedure, and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (p&lt;0.05).Conclusion In patients receiving programmed extracorporeal therapy, the serum concentration of NT-proBNP was considerably higher than mean values in the general population. Apparently, serum NT-proBNP concentrations in the range of 1127-2093 pg/ml can be used as a predictor for a high risk of CVE in the dialysis population. Pronounced structural alterations of the myocardium, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and hyperhydration are the factors that provide development of CVE on PHD. Large volumes of the PHD substitution solution are associated with a lower incidence of CVE in the dialysis population.

Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Online Hemodiafiltration: A Real-World Evidence Study in a Russian Dialysis Network

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is associated with improved survival. Whether the dose-response relationship between convective volume and mortality may be confounded by selection bias or descends from practice patterns is not clear. We sought to evaluate the role of patients' characteristics and practice patterns on OL-HDF dose and mortality in a large private dialysis network in the Republic of Russia.

METHODS

In this multicenter, historical cohort study, we included adult incident patients on OL-HDF with at least 90 days of survival on renal replacement therapy in centers belonging to the Russian Federation Fresenius Medical Care network (January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2016). We evaluated predictors and outcomes (survival) of substitution volume target achievement (Qsub > 21 L/session).

RESULTS

Among 1,081 enrolled patients, the average Qsub was 22.9 (±3.2) L/session; the mean ultrafiltration volume was 1.6 (±0.8) L/session. The mean age was 55.8 ± 13.2; 42% were woman. Most common comorbidities were congestive heart failure (39.7%) and peripheral vascular disease (21.7%). The average hemoglobin was 9.3 ± 1.3. The case-mix adjusted center effect accounted for 20% of variance in Qsub. The top 10 most important variables associated with higher Qsub were effective Qb, serum protein, Charlson's comorbidity index, hemoglobin, year of dialysis initiation (proxy of high Qsub treatment policy in the clinic network), predialysis heart rate, serum bicarbonate, serum phosphate, age, serum sodium, and dry body weight. In addition, we found that the association of Qb with Qsub is moderated by year of enrollment, intradialytic weight gain, and coronary artery disease, whereas higher hemoglobin concentration moderated the relationship between treatment time and Qsub. Finally, Qsub between 21 and 25 L/session was associated with longer 5-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Both center-dependent clinical practice standards and patient clinical conditions substantially contributed to the risk of low Qsub. We confirmed previous evidence indicating better survival among patients with Qsub ≥ 21 L/session.

Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a major public health problem affecting more than 2 million people worldwide. It is one of the most severe chronic non-communicable diseases. Haemodialysis (HD) is the most common therapeutic option but is also associated with a risk of cardiovascular events, hospitalisation and suboptimal quality of life. Over the past decades, haemodiafiltration (HDF) has become available. Although high-dose HDF has shown some promising survival advantage compared to conventional HD, the evidence remains controversial. A Cochrane systematic review found, in low-quality trials, with various convective forms of dialysis, a reduction in cardiovascular, but not all-cause mortality and the effects on non-fatal cardiovascular events and hospitalisation were uncertain. In contrast, an individual patient data analysis suggested that high-dose HDF reduced both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to HD. In view of these discrepant results, a definitive trial is required to determine whether high-dose HDF is preferable to high-flux HD. The comparison of high-dose HDF with high-flux HD (CONVINCE) study will assess the benefits and harms of high-dose HDF versus a conventional high-flux HD in adults with ESKD.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This international, prospective, open label, randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 1800 ESKD adults treated with HD in nine European countries. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to high-dose HDF versus continuation of conventional high-flux HD. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at 3 years' follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include cause-specific mortality, cardiovascular events, all-cause and infection-related hospitalisations, patient-reported outcomes (eg, health-related quality of life) and cost-effectiveness.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The CONVINCE study will address the question of benefits and harms of high-dose HDF compared to high-flux HD for kidney replacement therapy in patients with ESKD with a focus on survival, patient perspectives and cost-effectiveness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR 7138).

High convective volumes are associated with improvement in metabolic profile in diabetic patients on online haemodiafiltration

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) with high convective transport volumes improves patient survival in haemodialysis. Limiting the amount of convective volume has been proposed in patients with diabetes mellitus due to glucose load that is administered with replacement fluid. The objective of the study was to analyse the influence of substitution volume on the evolution of the metabolic profile and body composition of incident diabetic patients on OL-HDF.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective observational study in 29 incident diabetic patients on postdilution OL-HDF. Baseline data included clinical and demographic data, laboratory parameters (metabolic, nutritional and inflammatory profile) and body composition with bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). Laboratory parameters and mean substitution volume per session were collected every 4 months, and in 23 patients a further BIS was performed after a minimum of one year. Variations in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL-c, HDL-c, albumin, prealbumin and C reactive protein (CRP) were calculated at one year, 2 years, 3 years, and at the end of follow-up. Quarterly and annual variations were calculated as independent periods, and changes in body composition were analysed.

RESULTS

Age at baseline was 69.7±13.6 years, 62.1% were male, 72.3±13.9kg, 1.78±0.16m², with 48 (35.5-76) months on dialysis. Approximately 81.5% received insulin, 7.4% antidiabetic drugs and 51.9% statins. Mean substitution volume was 26.9±2.9L/session and follow-up period (time on OL-HDF) was 40.4±26 months. A significant correlation was observed between mean substitution volume and the increase in HDL-c (r=0.385, p=0.039) and prealbumin levels (r=0.404, p=0.003) throughout follow-up. Moreover, substitution volume was correlated with a reduction in CRP levels at one year (r=-0.531, p=0.005), 2 years (r=-0.463, p=0.046), and at the end of follow-up (r=-0.498, p=0.007). Patients with mean substitution volume >26.9L/session had a higher reduction in triglycerides and CRP, and an increase in HDL-c levels. These patients with >26.9L/session finished the study with higher HDL-c (48.1±9.4mg/dL vs. 41.2±11.6mg/dL, p=0.025) and lower CRP levels (0.21 [0.1-2.22] mg/dL vs. 1.01 [0.15-6.96] mg/dL, p=0.001), with no differences at baseline. Quarterly comparisons between substitution volume and laboratory changes [n=271] showed a significant correlation with a reduction in HbA1c (r=-0.146, p=0.021). Similar findings were obtained with annual comparisons [n=72] (r=-0.237, p=0.045). An annual mean substitution volume over 26.6L/session (29.3±1.7L/session vs. 23.9±1.9L/session) was associated with a reduction in HbA1c (-0.51±1.24% vs. 0.01±0.88%, p=0.043). No correlation was observed between substitution volume and changes in weight, body mass index or BIS parameters.

CONCLUSION

There is not enough evidence to restrict convective transport in diabetic patients on OL-HDF due to the glucose content of the replacement fluid.

Moving beyond small solute clearance: What evidence is there for more permeable dialyzers and haemodiafiltration?

Dialyzers were initially developed for diffusive clearance of uraemic toxins. Diffusion most effectively clears small uncharged solutes from plasma water, such as urea. Sessional urea clearance targets have been shown to be important for short-term patient survival, but over the longer term, although low-flux dialysis can prolong patient survival, accumulation of middle-sized uraemic toxins, such as β2 microglobulin can lead to disabling arthropathy. Although the introduction of high-flux dialyzers, designed to increase β2 microglobulin clearance, has reduced the prevalence of arthropathy; this has not been translated into a demonstrable significant improvement in patient survival. However, analysis of individual patients recruited into trials of haemo-diafiltration reported that greater convective clearance was associated with better survival, although the individual trials reported mixed outcomes. Most haemodiafiltration trials were not designed to study the effect of convective dose, so although reported patient survival was greater for those receiving greater convective volume exchange, these results could potentially be confounded by patient or center effects. An alternative approach to increasing middle-sized solute clearances would be to use more permeable dialyzers, but as yet there are no trials reporting survival with larger cutoff dialyzers. As such, although there is increasing evidence that increasing middle-sized molecular uraemic solute clearance is associated with improved patient survival, further prospective trials are required to determine whether as with Kt/Vurea there is a threshold effect of how much convective or middle-sized solute clearance is required to improve patient survival.

Effect of haemodiafiltration vs conventional haemodialysis on growth and cardiovascular outcomes in children - the HDF, heart and height (3H) study

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is prevalent in children on dialysis and accounts for almost 30% of all deaths. Randomised trials in adults suggest that haemodiafiltration (HDF) with high convection volumes is associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality compared to high-flux haemodialysis (HD); however paediatric data are scarce. We designed the haemodiafiltration, heart and height (3H) study to test the hypothesis that children on HDF have an improved cardiovascular risk profile, growth and nutritional status and quality of life, compared to those on conventional HD. We performed a non-randomised parallel-arm intervention study within the International Paediatric Haemodialysis Network Registry comparing children on HDF and conventional HD to determine annualised change in cardiovascular end-points and growth. Here we present the 3H study design and baseline characteristics of the study population.

METHODS

190 children were screened and 177 (106 on HD and 71 on HDF) recruited from 28 centres in 10 countries. There was no difference in age, underlying diagnosis, comorbidities, previous dialysis therapy, dialysis vintage, residual renal function, type of vascular access or blood flow between HD and HDF groups. High flux dialysers were used in 63% of HD patients and ultra-pure water was available in 52%. HDF patients achieved a median convection volume of 13.3 L/m²; this was associated with the blood flow rate only ((p = 0.0004, r = 0.42) and independent of access type (p = 0.38).

DISCUSSION

This is the largest study on dialysis outcomes in children that involves deep phenotyping across a wide range of cardiovascular, anthropometric, nutritional and health-related quality of life measures, to test the hypothesis that HDF leads to improved cardiovascular and growth outcomes compared to conventional HD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02063776 . The trial was prospectively registered on the 14 Feb 2014.

Mortality reduction by post-dilution online-haemodiafiltration: a cause-specific analysis

Background

From an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis from four randomized controlled trials comparing haemodialysis (HD) with post-dilution online-haemodiafiltration (ol-HDF), previously it appeared that HDF decreases all-cause mortality by 14% (95% confidence interval 25; 1) and fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) by 23% (39; 3). Significant differences were not found for fatal infections and sudden death. So far, it is unclear, however, whether the reduced mortality risk of HDF is only due to a decrease in CVD events and if so, which CVD in particular is prevented, if compared with HD.

Methods

The IPD base was used for the present study. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for cause-specific mortality overall and in thirds of the convection volume were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard regression models. Annualized mortality and numbers needed to treat (NNT) were calculated as well.

Results

Besides 554 patients dying from CVD, fatal infections and sudden death, 215 participants died from 'other causes', such as withdrawal from treatment and malignancies. In this group, the mortality risk was comparable between HD and ol-HDF patients, both overall and in thirds of the convection volume. Subdivision of CVD mortality in fatal cardiac, non-cardiac and unclassified CVD showed that ol-HDF was only associated with a lower risk of cardiac casualties [0.64 (0.61; 0.90)]. Annual mortality rates also suggest that the reduction in CVD death is mainly due to a decrease in cardiac fatalities, including both ischaemic heart disease and congestion. Overall, 32 and 75 patients, respectively, need to be treated by high-volume HDF (HV-HDF) to prevent one all-cause and one CVD death, respectively, per year.

Conclusion

The beneficial effect of ol-HDF on all-cause and CVD mortality appears to be mainly due to a reduction in fatal cardiac events, including ischaemic heart disease as well as congestion. In HV-HDF, the NNT to prevent one CVD death is 75 per year.

Short-term effects of hemodiafiltration versus conventional hemodialysis on erythrocyte performance

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is a renal replacement therapy that is based on the principles of diffusion and convection for the elimination of uremic toxins. A significant and increasing number of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are treated with HDF, even in the absence of definite and conclusive survival and anemia treatment data. However, its effects on red blood cell (RBC) physiological features have not been examined in depth. In this study, ESRD patients under regular HDF or conventional hemodialysis (cHD) treatment were examined for RBC-related parameters, including anemia, hemolysis, cell shape, redox status, removal signaling, membrane protein composition, and microvesiculation, in repeated paired measurements accomplished before and right after each dialysis session. The HDF group was characterized by better redox potential and suppressed exovesiculation of blood cells compared with the cHD group pre-dialysis. However, HDF was associated with a temporary but acute, oxidative-stress-driven increase in hemolysis, RBC removal signaling, and stomatocytosis, probably associated with the effective clearance of dialyzable natural antioxidant components, including uric acid, from the uremic plasma. The nature of these adverse short-term effects of HDF on post-dialysis plasma and RBCs strongly suggests the use of a parallel antioxidant therapy during the HDF session.

Treatment tolerance and patient-reported outcomes favor online hemodiafiltration compared to high-flux hemodialysis in the elderly

Large cohort studies suggest that high convective volumes associated with online hemodiafiltration may reduce the risk of mortality/morbidity compared to optimal high-flux hemodialysis. By contrast, intradialytic tolerance is not well studied. The aim of the FRENCHIE (French Convective versus Hemodialysis in Elderly) study was to compare high-flux hemodialysis and online hemodiafiltration in terms of intradialytic tolerance. In this prospective, open-label randomized controlled trial, 381 elderly chronic hemodialysis patients (over age 65) were randomly assigned in a one-to-one ratio to either high-flux hemodialysis or online hemodiafiltration. The primary outcome was intradialytic tolerance (day 30-day 120). Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life, cardiovascular risk biomarkers, morbidity, and mortality. During the observational period for intradialytic tolerance, 85% and 84% of patients in high-flux hemodialysis and online hemodiafiltration arms, respectively, experienced at least one adverse event without significant difference between groups. As exploratory analysis, intradialytic tolerance was also studied, considering the sessions as a statistical unit according to treatment actually received. Over a total of 11,981 sessions, 2,935 were complicated by the occurrence of at least one adverse event, with a significantly lower occurrence in online hemodiafiltration with fewer episodes of intradialytic symptomatic hypotension and muscle cramps. By contrast, health-related quality of life, morbidity, and mortality were not different in both groups. An improvement in the control of metabolic bone disease biomarkers and β2-microglobulin level without change in serum albumin concentration was observed with online hemodiafiltration. Thus, overall outcomes favor online hemodiafiltration over high-flux hemodialysis in the elderly.

Are all Dialyzers Compatible with the Convective Volumes Suggested for Postdilution Online Hemodiafiltration?

Introduction

The recent analysis of 4 randomized controlled trials has confirmed the lower mortality risk for postdilution online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) compared to hemodialysis, and above all for patients with the highest delivered body surface area standardized convective volume (CV/BSA >23 L/1.73 m2/session). Since the impact of the dialyzers used in these trials has never been studied, we retrospectively analyzed clinical tests carried out with 19 commonly used dialyzers. The aim was to provide information on their performances and behavior to aid in an objective choice for therapies associated with OL-HDF.

Methods

“Efficiency” was evaluated by measuring the reduction ratio of beta-2 microglobulin (RRß2M) and myoglobin (RRmyo) for a CV/BSA between 0 and 30 L, extrapolating them at CV/BSA = 23 L “Safety” was defined by the safe CV (CVsafe), corresponding to the CV/BSA above which albumin loss is >5 g/session. Results: With CV/BSA = 23 L, all the dialyzers ensure an optimal ß2M extraction (RRß2M: 76%–84.5%). For myoglobin, efficiency disparities are bigger (RRmyo: 40%–85%). Above all, 4/19 dialyzers lose more than 5 g albumin and should not be used under these conditions.

Conclusions

It is recommended to prescribe dialyzers that are above all safe. Moreover, if one considers that the removal of middle molecule solutes prevails over the CV necessary for their transmembrane transport, some dialyzers that are more efficient with CV/BSA <23 L than others with CV/BSA >= 23 L might then be prescribed when the conditions do not permit the suggested CV/BSA goal to be achieved.