Olutasidenib (FT-2102) in patients with relapsed or refractory IDH1-mutant glioma: A multicenter, open-label, phase Ib/II trial

Advances in the treatment of IDH-mutant gliomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation is a defining molecular driver of WHO grade 2-4 astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. In this article, we review the recent therapeutic approaches specifically targeting IDH-mutant gliomas and summarize ongoing clinical trials in this population.

RECENT FINDINGS

The IDH inhibitor vorasidenib recently demonstrated its efficacy after surgical resection in grade 2 IDH-mutated gliomas. Several studies in patients with IDH-mutant gliomas are currently exploring various strategies to target IDH mutations, including the use of small-molecule inhibitors, immunotherapies, peptide vaccines and agents targeting metabolic and epigenomic vulnerabilities.

SUMMARY

Mutant-IDH targeting holds significant promise in treating progressive or recurrent IDH-mutant gliomas. Recent results with IDH inhibitors will change practice and influence the existing guidelines in a near future.

The Role of Mutant IDH Inhibitors in the Treatment of Glioma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The identification of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations has led to a transformation in our understanding of gliomas and has paved the way to a new era of targeted therapy. In this article, we review the classification of IDH-mutant glioma, standard of care treatment options, clinical evidence for mutant IDH (mIDH) inhibitors, and practical implications of the recent landmark INDIGO trial.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled INDIGO trial, mIDH1/2 inhibitor vorasidenib increased progression-free survival among non-enhancing grade 2 IDH-mutant gliomas following surgery. This marks the first positive randomized trial of targeted therapy in IDH-mutant glioma, and led to the US Food and Drug Administration's approval of vorasidenib in August 2024 for grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma. Vorasidenib is a well-tolerated treatment that can benefit a subset of patients with IDH-mutant glioma. Targeting mIDH also remains a promising strategy for select groups of patients excluded from the INDIGO trial. Ongoing and future studies, including with new agents and with combination therapy approaches, may expand the benefit and unlock the potential of mIDH inhibitors.

SEOM-GEINO clinical guidelines for grade 2 gliomas (2023)

The 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification has updated the definition of grade 2 gliomas and the presence of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation has been deemed the cornerstone of diagnosis. Though slow-growing and having a low proliferative index, grade 2 gliomas are incurable by surgery and complementary treatments are vital to improving prognosis. This guideline provides recommendations on the multidisciplinary treatment of grade 2 astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas based on the best evidence available.

The biological significance of tumor grade, age, enhancement, and extent of resection in IDH-mutant gliomas: How should they inform treatment decisions in the era of IDH inhibitors?

The 2016 and 2021 World Health Organization 2021 Classification of central nervous system tumors have resulted in a major improvement in the classification of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant gliomas. With more effective treatments many patients experience prolonged survival. However, treatment guidelines are often still based on information from historical series comprising both patients with IDH wild-type and IDH-mutant tumors. They provide recommendations for radiotherapy and chemotherapy for so-called high-risk patients, usually based on residual tumor after surgery and age over 40. More up-to-date studies give a better insight into clinical, radiological, and molecular factors associated with the outcome of patients with IDH-mutant glioma. These insights should be used today for risk stratification and for treatment decisions. In many patients with IDH-mutant grades 2 and 3 glioma, if carefully monitored postponing radiotherapy and chemotherapy is safe, and will not jeopardize the overall outcome of patients. With the INDIGO trial showing patient benefit from the IDH inhibitor vorasidenib, there is a sizable population in which it seems reasonable to try this class of agents before recommending radio-chemotherapy with its delayed adverse event profile affecting quality of survival. Ongoing trials should help to further identify the patients that are benefiting from this treatment.

Tumor Metabolism: A New Field for the Treatment of Glioma

The clinical treatment of glioma remains relatively immature. Commonly used clinical treatments for gliomas are surgery combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but there is a problem of drug resistance. In addition, immunotherapy and targeted therapies also suffer from the problem of immune evasion. The advent of metabolic therapy holds immense potential for advancing more efficacious and tolerable therapies against this aggressive disease. Metabolic therapy alters the metabolic processes of tumor cells at the molecular level to inhibit tumor growth and spread, and lead to better outcomes for patients with glioma that are insensitive to conventional treatments. Moreover, compared with conventional therapy, it has less impact on normal cells, less toxicity and side effects, and higher safety. The objective of this review is to examine the changes in metabolic characteristics throughout the development of glioma, enumerate the current methodologies employed for studying tumor metabolism, and highlight the metabolic reprogramming pathways of glioma along with their potential molecular mechanisms. Importantly, it seeks to elucidate potential metabolic targets for glioblastoma (GBM) therapy and summarize effective combination treatment strategies based on various studies.

A perioperative study of Safusidenib in patients with IDH1-mutated glioma

This is a single arm, open label perioperative trial to assess the feasibility, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of treatment with safusidenib following biopsy, and prior to surgical resection in patients with IDH1 mutated glioma who have not received radiation therapy or chemotherapy. Fifteen participants will receive treatment in two parts. First, biopsy followed by one cycle (28 days) of safusidenib, an orally available, small molecular inhibitor of mutated IDH1, then maximal safe resection of the tumor (Part A). Second, after recovery from surgery, safusidenib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (Part B). This research will enable objective measurement of biological activity of safusidenib in patients with IDH1 mutated glioma. Anti-tumor activity will be assessed by progression free survival and time to next intervention.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05577416 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Low-Grade Gliomas: A New Mutation, New Targeted Therapy, and Many Questions

The discovery in 2008 that many adult gliomas harbor a hitherto unknown mutation in the metabolic gene isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) initiated revolutionary advances in our understanding of the biology, and correspondingly our classification, of gliomas. IDH mutations are found in most nonglioblastoma adult gliomas and portend a better prognosis. Massive efforts have unraveled many of the pleiotropic cellular effects of these mutations and spawned several lines of investigation to target the effect to therapeutic benefit. In this article are reviewed the implications of the IDH mutation in gliomas, in particular focusing on recent studies that have culminated in a rare positive phase 3 trial in these generally refractory tumors.

Targeting Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) in Solid Tumors: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

The isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) enzymes are involved in key metabolic processes in human cells, regulating differentiation, proliferation, and oxidative damage response. IDH mutations have been associated with tumor development and progression in various solid tumors such as glioma, cholangiocarcinoma, chondrosarcoma, and other tumor types and have become crucial markers in molecular classification and prognostic assessment. The intratumoral and serum levels of D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG) could serve as diagnostic biomarkers for identifying IDH mutant (IDHmut) tumors. As a result, an increasing number of clinical trials are evaluating targeted treatments for IDH1/IDH2 mutations. Recent studies have shown that the focus of these new therapeutic strategies is not only the neomorphic activity of the IDHmut enzymes but also the epigenetic shift induced by IDH mutations and the potential role of combination treatments. Here, we provide an overview of the current knowledge about IDH mutations in solid tumors, with a particular focus on available IDH-targeted treatments and emerging results from clinical trials aiming to explore IDHmut tumor-specific features and to identify the clinical benefit of IDH-targeted therapies and their combination strategies. An insight into future perspectives and the emerging roles of circulating biomarkers and radiomic features is also included.

Treatment of IDH-mutant glioma in the INDIGO era

Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumor and are uniformly lethal. Despite significant advancements in understanding the genetic landscape of gliomas, standard-of-care has remained largely unchanged. Subsets of gliomas are defined by gain-of-function mutations in the metabolic genes encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH). Efforts to exploit mutant IDH activity and/or directly inhibit it with mutant IDH inhibitors have been the focus of over a decade of research. The recently published INDIGO trial, demonstrating the benefit of the mutant IDH inhibitor vorasidenib in patients with low-grade IDH-mutant gliomas, introduces a new era of precision medicine in brain tumors that is poised to change standard-of-care. In this review, we highlight and contextualize the results of the INDIGO trial and introduce key questions whose answers will guide how mutant IDH inhibitors may be used in the clinic. We discuss possible combination therapies with mutant IDH inhibition and future directions for clinical and translational research.

IDH inhibition in gliomas: from preclinical models to clinical trials

Gliomas are the most common malignant primary brain tumours in adults and cannot usually be cured with standard cancer treatments. Gliomas show intratumoural and intertumoural heterogeneity at the histological and molecular levels, and they frequently contain mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) or IDH2 gene. IDH-mutant adult-type diffuse gliomas are subdivided into grade 2, 3 or 4 IDH-mutant astrocytomas and grade 2 or 3 IDH-mutant, 1p19q-codeleted oligodendrogliomas. The product of the mutated IDH genes, D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG), induces global DNA hypermethylation and interferes with immunity, leading to stimulation of tumour growth. Selective inhibitors of mutant IDH, such as ivosidenib and vorasidenib, have been shown to reduce D-2-HG levels and induce cellular differentiation in preclinical models and to induce MRI-detectable responses in early clinical trials. The phase III INDIGO trial has demonstrated superiority of vorasidenib, a brain-penetrant pan-mutant IDH inhibitor, over placebo in people with non-enhancing grade 2 IDH-mutant gliomas following surgery. In this Review, we describe the pathway of development of IDH inhibitors in IDH-mutant low-grade gliomas from preclinical models to clinical trials. We discuss the practice-changing implications of the INDIGO trial and consider new avenues of investigation in the field of IDH-mutant gliomas.

Decoding mitochondria's role in immunity and cancer therapy

The functions of mitochondria, including energy production and biomolecule synthesis, have been known for a long time. Given the rising incidence of cancer, the role of mitochondria in cancer has become increasingly popular. Activated by components released by mitochondria, various pathways interact with each other to induce immune responses to protect organisms from attack. However, mitochondria play dual roles in the progression of cancer. Abnormalities in proteins, which are the elementary structures of mitochondria, are closely linked with oncogenesis. Both the aberrant accumulation of intermediates and mutations in enzymes result in the generation and progression of cancer. Therefore, targeting mitochondria to treat cancer may be a new strategy. Several drugs aimed at inhibiting mutated enzymes and accumulated intermediates have been tested clinically. Here, we discuss the current understanding of mitochondria in cancer and the interactions between mitochondrial functions, immune responses, and oncogenesis. Furthermore, we discuss mitochondria as hopeful targets for cancer therapy, providing insights into the progression of future therapeutic strategies.

State of the Art in Low-Grade Glioma Management: Insights From Isocitrate Dehydrogenase and Beyond

Low-grade gliomas present a formidable challenge in neuro-oncology because of the challenges imposed by the blood-brain barrier, predilection for the young adult population, and propensity for recurrence. In the past two decades, the systematic examination of genomic alterations in adults and children with primary brain tumors has uncovered profound new insights into the pathogenesis of these tumors, resulting in more accurate tumor classification and prognostication. It also identified several common recurrent genomic alterations that now define specific brain tumor subtypes and have provided a new opportunity for molecularly targeted therapeutic intervention. Adult-type diffuse low-grade gliomas are frequently associated with mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2), resulting in production of 2-hydroxyglutarate, an oncometabolite important for tumorigenesis. Recent studies of IDH inhibitors have yielded promising results in patients at early stages of disease with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and delayed time to radiation and chemotherapy. Pediatric-type gliomas have high rates of alterations in BRAF, including BRAF V600E point mutations or BRAF-KIAA1549 rearrangements. BRAF inhibitors, often combined with MEK inhibitors, have resulted in radiographic response and improved PFS in these patients. This article reviews emerging approaches to the treatment of low-grade gliomas, including a discussion of targeted therapies and how they integrate with the current treatment modalities of surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation.

Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors in Glioma: From Bench to Bedside

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas are a primary malignancy of the central nervous system (CNS) malignancies, most commonly affecting adults under the age of 55. Standard of care therapy for IDH-mutant gliomas involves maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. However, despite good initial responses to multimodality treatment, recurrence is virtually universal. IDH-mutant gliomas represent a life-limiting prognosis. For this reason, there is a great need for novel treatments that can prolong survival. Uniquely for IDH-mutant gliomas, the IDH mutation is the direct driver of oncogenesis through its oncometabolite 2-hydroxygluterate. Inhibition of this mutated IDH with a corresponding reduction in 2-hydroxygluterate offers an attractive treatment target. Researchers have tested several IDH inhibitors in glioma through preclinical and early clinical trials. A phase III clinical trial of an IDH1 and IDH2 inhibitor vorasidenib yielded promising results among patients with low-grade IDH-mutant gliomas who had undergone initial surgery and no radiation or chemotherapy. However, many questions remain regarding optimal use of IDH inhibitors in clinical practice. In this review, we discuss the importance of IDH mutations in oncogenesis of adult-type diffuse gliomas and current evidence supporting the use of IDH inhibitors as therapeutic agents for glioma treatment. We also examine unresolved questions and propose potential directions for future research.

Overcoming Resistance to Temozolomide in Glioblastoma: A Scoping Review of Preclinical and Clinical Data

Glioblastoma (GB) is the most common and most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, with an overall survival almost 14.6 months. Optimal resection followed by combined temozolomide chemotherapy and radiotherapy, also known as Stupp protocol, remains the standard of treatment; nevertheless, resistance to temozolomide, which can be obtained throughout many molecular pathways, is still an unsurpassed obstacle. Several factors influence the efficacy of temozolomide, including the involvement of other DNA repair systems, aberrant signaling pathways, autophagy, epigenetic modifications, microRNAs, and extracellular vesicle production. The blood-brain barrier, which serves as both a physical and biochemical obstacle, the tumor microenvironment's pro-cancerogenic and immunosuppressive nature, and tumor-specific characteristics such as volume and antigen expression, are the subject of ongoing investigation. In this review, preclinical and clinical data about temozolomide resistance acquisition and possible ways to overcome chemoresistance, or to treat gliomas without restoration of chemosensitinity, are evaluated and presented. The objective is to offer a thorough examination of the clinically significant molecular mechanisms and their intricate interrelationships, with the aim of enhancing understanding to combat resistance to TMZ more effectively.

Molecular biology and novel therapeutics for IDH mutant gliomas: The new era of IDH inhibitors

Gliomas with Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation represent a discrete category of primary brain tumors with distinct and unique characteristics, behaviors, and clinical disease outcomes. IDH mutations lead to aberrant high-level production of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2HG), which act as a competitive inhibitor of enzymes regulating epigenetics, signaling pathways, metabolism, and various other processes. This review summarizes the significance of IDH mutations, resulting upregulation of D-2HG and the associated molecular pathways in gliomagenesis. With the recent finding of clinically effective IDH inhibitors in these gliomas, this article offers a comprehensive overview of the new era of innovative therapeutic approaches based on mechanistic rationales, encompassing both completed and ongoing clinical trials targeting gliomas with IDH mutations.

Pharmacological Profile of Novel Anti-cancer Drugs Approved by USFDA in 2022: A Review

BACKGROUND

For any drug molecule, it is mandatory to pass the drug approval process of the concerned regulatory authority, before being marketed. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), throughout the year, approves several new drugs for safety and efficacy. In addition to new drug approvals, FDA also works on improving access to generic drugs, aimed to lower the cost of drugs for patients and improve access to treatments. In the year 2022 twelve new drug therapies were approved for managing varying cancers.

METHODS

This manuscript is focused to describe the pharmacological aspects including therapeutic uses, mechanisms of actions, pharmacokinetics, adverse effects, doses, indication for special cases, contraindications, etc., of novel FDA-approved anticancer drug therapies in the year 2022.

RESULT

FDA has approved about 29% (11 out of 37) novel drug therapies for varying types of cancers such as lung cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, melanoma, leukemia, etc. The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research CDER has reported that 90% of these anticancer drugs (e.g. Adagrasib, Futibatinib, Mirvetuximabsoravtansinegynx, Mosunetuzumab-axb, Nivolumab and relatlimab-rmbw, Olutasidenib, Pacritinib, Tebentafusp-tebn, Teclistamab-cqyv, and Tremelimumab-actl) as orphan drugs and recommended to treat rare or uncommon cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic intrahepatic cholangio-carcinoma, epithelial ovarian cancer, follicular lymphoma, metastatic melanoma, metastatic uveal melanoma, etc. CDER has identified six anticancer drugs (e.g. Lutetium (177Lu)vipivotidetetraxetan, Mirvetuximabsoravtansine- gynx, Mosunetuzumab-axb, Nivolumab and relatlimab-rmbw, Tebentafusp-tebn, Teclistamab-cqyv) as first-in-class drugs i.e. drugs having different mechanisms of action from the already existing ones. The newly approved anticancer drugs shall provide more efficient treatment options for cancer patients. Three FDA-approved anticancer drugs in the year 2023 are also briefly described in the manuscript.

CONCLUSION

This manuscript, describing the pharmacological aspects of eleven anticancer novel drug therapies approved by the FDA, shall serve as a helpful document for cancer patients, concerned academicians, researchers, and clinicians, especially oncologists.

Recent advance of clinically approved small-molecule drugs for the treatment of myeloid leukemia

Myeloid leukemia denotes a hematologic malignancy characterized by aberrant proliferation and impaired differentiation of blood progenitor cells within the bone marrow. Despite the availability of several treatment options, the clinical outlook for individuals afflicted with myeloid leukemia continues to be unfavorable, making it a challenging disease to manage. Over the past, substantial endeavors have been dedicated to the identification of novel targets and the advancement of enhanced therapeutic modalities to ameliorate the management of this disease, resulting in the discovery of many clinically approved small-molecule drugs for myeloid leukemia, including histone deacetylase inhibitors, hypomethylating agents, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This comprehensive review succinctly presents an up-to-date assessment of the application and synthetic routes of clinically sanctioned small-molecule drugs employed in the treatment of myeloid leukemia. Additionally, it provides a concise exploration of the pertinent challenges and prospects encompassing drug resistance and toxicity. Overall, this review effectively underscores the considerable promise exhibited by clinically endorsed small-molecule drugs in the therapeutic realm of myeloid leukemia, while concurrently shedding light on the prospective avenues that may shape the future landscape of drug development within this domain.

Adult-type Diffuse Gliomas

OBJECTIVE

This article highlights key aspects of the diagnosis and management of adult-type diffuse gliomas, including glioblastomas and IDH-mutant gliomas relevant to the daily practice of the general neurologist.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

The advances in molecular characterization of gliomas have translated into more accurate prognostication and tumor classification. Gliomas previously categorized by histological appearance solely as astrocytomas or oligodendrogliomas are now also defined by molecular features. Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials have incorporated these advances to tailor more effective treatments for specific glioma subtypes.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Despite recent insights into the molecular aspects of gliomas, these tumors remain incurable. Care for patients with these complex tumors requires a multidisciplinary team in which the general neurologist has an important role. Efforts focus on translating the latest data into more effective therapies that can prolong survival.

New drug approvals for 2022: Synthesis and clinical applications

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved a total of 37 new drugs in 2022, which are composed of 20 chemical entities and 17 biologics. In particular, 20 chemical entities, including 17 small molecule drugs, 1 radiotherapy, and 2 diagnostic agents, provide privileged scaffolds, breakthrough clinical benefits, and a new mechanism of action for the discovery of more potent clinical candidates. The structure-based drug development with clear targets and fragment-based drug development with privileged scaffolds have always been the important modules in the field of drug discovery, which could easily bypass the patent protection and bring about improved biological activity. Therefore, we summarized the relevant valuable information about clinical application, mechanism of action, and chemical synthesis of 17 newly approved small molecule drugs in 2022. We hope this timely and comprehensive review could bring about creative and elegant inspiration on the synthetic methodologies and mechanism of action for the discovery of new drugs with novel chemical scaffolds and extended clinical indications.

The strategies to cure cancer patients by eradicating cancer stem-like cells

Cancer stem-like cells (CSCs), a subpopulation of cancer cells, possess remarkable capability in proliferation, self-renewal, and differentiation. Their presence is recognized as a crucial factor contributing to tumor progression and metastasis. CSCs have garnered significant attention as a therapeutic focus and an etiologic root of treatment-resistant cells. Increasing evidence indicated that specific biomarkers, aberrant activated pathways, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), and immunoevasion are considered the culprits in the occurrence of CSCs and the maintenance of CSCs properties including multi-directional differentiation. Targeting CSC biomarkers, stemness-associated pathways, TME, immunoevasion and inducing CSCs differentiation improve CSCs eradication and, therefore, cancer treatment. This review comprehensively summarized these targeted therapies, along with their current status in clinical trials. By exploring and implementing strategies aimed at eradicating CSCs, researchers aim to improve cancer treatment outcomes and overcome the challenges posed by CSC-mediated therapy resistance.

S100A6 is a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for human glioma

S100 calcium-binding protein A6 (S100A6) is a protein that belongs to the S100 family. The present study aimed to investigate the function of S100A6 in the diagnosis and survival prediction of glioma and elucidated the potential processes affecting glioma development. The Cancer Genome Atlas database was searched to identify the relationship among S100A6 expression, immune cell infiltration, clinicopathological parameters and glioma prognosis. Several clinical cases were used to verify these findings. S100A6 gene expression was high in glioma tissues, suggesting its diagnostic significance. In particular, S100A6 upregulation in glioma tissues exhibited a significant and positive correlation with the World Health Organization (WHO) grade, histological type, age, sex, primary treatment outcomes, 1p/19q codeletion, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status, overall survival (OS), progression-free interval and disease-specific survival. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses revealed that S100A6 gene expression can independently function as a risk factor affecting the prognosis of patients with glioma. Furthermore, Gene Ontology functional enrichment analysis revealed that S100A6 is implicated in immune responses and that the expression profiles of S100A6 are linked to the immune microenvironment. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry revealed that increased S100A6 protein levels are correlated with age, 1p/19q codeletion, IDH status, WHO grade and OS. The present findings suggest that increased S100A6 expression is an indicator of the dismal prognosis of patients with glioma and that it can be used as a potential diagnostic biomarker for this condition.

Molecular Profiling and Targeted Therapies in Gliomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Molecular profiling enables the evaluation of genetic alterations for the diagnosis and classification of gliomas and the selection of appropriate therapies. This review summarizes the current role of molecular profiling and targeted therapies for gliomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

Molecular profiling is an integral part of the 2021 WHO classification of gliomas. Progress in the development of targeted therapies remains limited due to many factors including the presence of the blood-brain barrier and issues of tumor heterogeneity. Nonetheless, advances have been made with the IDH1/2 inhibitor vorasidenib for IDH-mutant grade 2 gliomas, the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib for BRAFV600E mutated gliomas, and the therapies for subsets of patients with fusions and H3K27M-altered diffuse midline gliomas. While there has been progress in the use of molecular profiling for the classification and treatment of gliomas, much work remains for targeted therapies to realize their potential.

Mutant IDH in Gliomas: Role in Cancer and Treatment Options

Altered metabolism is a common feature of many cancers and, in some cases, is a consequence of mutation in metabolic genes, such as the ones involved in the TCA cycle. Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) is mutated in many gliomas and other cancers. Physiologically, IDH converts isocitrate to α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), but when mutated, IDH reduces α-KG to D2-hydroxyglutarate (D2-HG). D2-HG accumulates at elevated levels in IDH mutant tumours, and in the last decade, a massive effort has been made to develop small inhibitors targeting mutant IDH. In this review, we summarise the current knowledge about the cellular and molecular consequences of IDH mutations and the therapeutic approaches developed to target IDH mutant tumours, focusing on gliomas.

Challenges for the development of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenases 1 inhibitors to treat glioma

Glioma is one of the most common types of brain tumors, and its high recurrence and mortality rates threaten human health. In 2008, the frequent isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations in glioma were reported, which brought a new strategy in the treatment of this challenging disease. In this perspective, we first discuss the possible gliomagenesis after IDH1 mutations (mIDH1). Subsequently, we systematically investigate the reported mIDH1 inhibitors and present a comparative analysis of the ligand-binding pocket in mIDH1. Additionally, we also discuss the binding features and physicochemical properties of different mIDH1 inhibitors to facilitate the future development of mIDH1 inhibitors. Finally, we discuss the possible selectivity features of mIDH1 inhibitors against WT-IDH1 and IDH2 by combining protein-based and ligand-based information. We hope that this perspective can inspire the development of mIDH1 inhibitors and bring potent mIDH1 inhibitors for the treatment of glioma.

Molecular Profiling in Neuro-Oncology: Where We Are, Where We're Heading, and How We Ensure Everyone Can Come Along

Advances in molecular profiling have led to improved understanding of glioma heterogeneity. Results have been used to inform diagnostic classification and targeted treatment strategies. Validation of these tests is necessary in the development of biomarkers that can aid in treatment decision, allowing for personalized medicine in neuro-oncologic diseases. Although not all populations have benefitted equally from awareness of and access to testing, opportunities arise regarding incorporating this testing into the standard of care for patients with glioma.

Therapies for IDH-Mutant Gliomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas are a distinct type of primary brain tumors with unique characteristics, behavior, and disease outcomes. This article provides a review of standard of care treatment options and innovative, therapeutic approaches that are currently under investigation for these tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Extensive pre-clinical data and a variety of clinical studies support targeting IDH mutations in glioma using different mechanisms, which include direct inhibition and immunotherapies that target metabolic and epigenomic vulnerabilities caused by these mutations. IDH mutations have been recognized as an oncogenic driver in gliomas for more than a decade and as a positive prognostic factor influencing the research for new therapeutic methods including IDH inhibitors, DNA repair inhibitors, and immunotherapy.

Mutated Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (mIDH) as Target for PET Imaging in Gliomas

Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors in adults. A diffuse infiltrative growth pattern and high resistance to therapy make them largely incurable, but there are significant differences in the prognosis of patients with different subtypes of glioma. Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) have been recognized as an important biomarker for glioma classification and a potential therapeutic target. However, current clinical methods for detecting mutated IDH (mIDH) require invasive tissue sampling and cannot be used for follow-up examinations or longitudinal studies. PET imaging could be a promising approach for non-invasive assessment of the IDH status in gliomas, owing to the availability of various mIDH-selective inhibitors as potential leads for the development of PET tracers. In the present review, we summarize the rationale for the development of mIDH-selective PET probes, describe their potential applications beyond the assessment of the IDH status and highlight potential challenges that may complicate tracer development. In addition, we compile the major chemical classes of mIDH-selective inhibitors that have been described to date and briefly consider possible strategies for radiolabeling of the most promising candidates. Where available, we also summarize previous studies with radiolabeled analogs of mIDH inhibitors and assess their suitability for PET imaging in gliomas.

Metabolic reprograming of cancer as a therapeutic target

Our understanding of metabolic reprogramming in cancer has tremendously improved along with the technical progression of metabolomic analysis. Metabolic changes in cancer cells proved much more complicated than the classical Warburg effect. Previous studies have approached metabolic changes as therapeutic and/or chemopreventive targets. Recently, several clinical trials have reported anti-cancer agents associated with metabolism. However, whether cancer cells are dependent on metabolic reprogramming or favor suitable conditions remains nebulous. Both scenarios are possibly intertwined. Identification of downstream molecules and the understanding of mechanisms underlying reprogrammed metabolism can improve the effectiveness of cancer therapy. Here, we review several examples of the metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells and the therapies targeting the metabolism-related molecules as well as discuss practical approaches to improve the next generation of cancer therapies focused on the metabolic reprogramming of cancer.

Olutasidenib: First Approval

Olutasidenib (REZLIDHIA^TM), an isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) inhibitor, is being developed by Rigel Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Olutasidenib was recently approved in the USA for the treatment of adults with R/R AML with a susceptible IDH1 mutation as detected by a US Food and Drug Administration-approved test. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of olutasidenib leading to this first approval for R/R AML.

Olutasidenib alone or with azacitidine in IDH1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: phase 1 results of a phase 1/2 trial

BACKGROUND

Olutasidenib (FT-2102) is a potent, selective, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1). The aims for phase 1 of this phase 1/2 study were to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of olutasidenib, as monotherapy or in combination with azacitidine, in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome, harbouring mutant IDH1.

METHODS

In this phase 1/2, multicentre, open-label clinical trial, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with acute myeloid leukaemia or intermediate, high, or very high risk myelodysplastic syndrome harbouring mutant IDH1 at 18 study sites in the USA, Australia, France, and Spain. Other key eligibility criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 with adequate liver and renal function. The primary outcomes were dose-limiting toxicities and the maximum tolerated dose, maximum evaluated dose, and the recommended phase 2 dose of olutasidenib. Olutasidenib was administered orally in doses of 150 mg once daily, 150 mg twice per day, and 300 mg once daily. Azacitidine (75 mg/m²) was administered subcutaneously or intravenously daily for 7 days on, 21 days off. The study was ongoing at the data cutoff (Oct 2, 2019) and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02719574.

FINDINGS

Patients were enrolled between Aug 8, 2016, and Nov 14, 2018. 78 patients received olutasidenib as monotherapy (n=32) or in combination with azacitidine (n=46). The median follow-up was 8·3 months (IQR 3·1-13·3) for monotherapy and 10·1 months (4·2-15·3) for combination therapy. 16 (50%) of 32 patients in the monotherapy group and 24 (52%) of 46 patients in the combination therapy group were women. Most patients were White (26 [81%] for monotherapy and 31 [67%] for combination therapy). No dose-limiting toxicities were reported in the dose-escalation cohorts and 150 mg twice per day was declared the recommended phase 2 dose on the basis of safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity. The most common (≥20%) grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events with monotherapy were thrombocytopenia (nine [28%] of 32 patients), febrile neutropenia (seven [22%] of 32), and anaemia (seven [22%] of 32); and with combination therapy were thrombocytopenia (19 [41%] of 46), febrile neutropenia (13 [28%] of 46), neutropenia (13 [28%] of 46), and anaemia (nine [20%] of 46). 11 (34%) of 32 patients in the monotherapy group and nine (20%) of 46 patients in the combination therapy group died (most commonly from disease progression [three (9%) of 32 and four (9%) of 46]). No deaths were considered study-drug related. For patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia, 41% (95% CI 21-64; nine of 22) receiving monotherapy and 46% (27-67; 12 of 26) receiving combination therapy had an overall response. For treatment-naive patients with acute myeloid leukaemia, 25% (1-81; one of four) receiving monotherapy and 77% (46-95; ten of 13) receiving combination therapy had an overall response.

INTERPRETATION

Olutasidenib, with or without azacitidine, was well tolerated and showed meaningful clinical activity in patients with IDH1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia. The results of this phase 1 study provide rationale for the continued evaluation of olutasidenib in multiple patient populations with myeloid malignancies.

FUNDING

Forma Therapeutics.

Targeting IDH1/IDH2 mutations in gliomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Somatic point mutations in the metabolic enzyme isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) are a defining feature of the majority of WHO grade 2-3 diffuse glioma and the most powerful positive prognostic factor for survival in gliomas. The purpose is to review experimental therapeutic approaches targeting IDH mutations in gliomas including small-molecule inhibitors, immunotherapies, and agents targeting mutant IDH-induced epigenetic and metabolic vulnerabilities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Extensive preclinical work supports targeting mutant IDH (mIDH) in glioma. In heavily pretreated patients with mIDH glioma, enzyme inhibitors demonstrated to be well tolerated with preliminary evidence of clinical activity in nonenhancing tumors and enhancing tumors when used as single agents. In patients with newly diagnosed WHO grade 3 or 4 astrocytomas, a phase 1 study of a vaccine-targeting IDH1 R132H showed to be well tolerated and demonstrated immunogenicity with a 3-year progression-free and overall survival rates of 0.63 and 0.84, respectively. A variety of ongoing trials aim to target mIDH, including treatments with single agents or combinatory approaches in the upfront or recurrent setting.

SUMMARY

mIDH are commonly found in gliomas and play a key role in gliomagenesis. This has led to studies using agents to directly inhibit them, immunotherapies, and epigenetic/metabolic drugs with varying and promising results. Ongoing studies may elucidate the precise role of these therapies and the best timing for treatment within the disease course.