Long-term results of carmustine wafer implantation for newly diagnosed glioblastomas: a controlled propensity-matched analysis of a French multicenter cohort

Local therapy in glioma: An evolving paradigm from history to horizons (Review)

Despite the implementation of multimodal treatments after surgery, glioblastoma (GBM) remains an incurable disease, posing a significant challenge in neuro-oncology. In this clinical setting, local therapy (LT), a developing paradigm, has received significant interest over time due to its potential to overcome the drawbacks of conventional therapy options for GBM. The present review aimed to trace the historical development, highlight contemporary advances and provide insights into the future horizons of LT in GBM management. In compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols criteria, a systematic review of the literature on the role of LT in GBM management was conducted. A total of 2,467 potentially relevant articles were found and, after removal of duplicates, 2,007 studies were screened by title and abstract (Cohen's κ coefficient=0.92). Overall, it emerged that 15, 10 and 6 clinical studies explored the clinical efficiency of intraoperative local treatment modalities, local radiotherapy and local immunotherapy, respectively. GBM recurrences occur within 2 cm of the radiation field in 80% of cases, emphasizing the significant influence of local factors on recurrence. This highlights the urgent requirement for LT strategies. In total, three primary reasons have thus led to the development of numerous LT solutions in recent decades: i) Intratumoral implants allow the blood-brain barrier to be bypassed, resulting in limited systemic toxicity; ii) LT facilitates bridging therapy between surgery and standard treatments; and iii) given the complexity of GBM, targeting multiple components of the tumor microenvironment through ligands specific to various elements could have a synergistic effect in treatments. Considering the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of GBM, the disease prognosis could be significantly improved by a combination of therapeutic strategies in the era of precision medicine.

Clinical Course after Carmustine Wafer Implantation for Newly Diagnosed Adult-type Diffuse Gliomas; A controlled propensity matched analysis of a single center cohort

PURPOSE

It remains unclear whether combining carmustine wafer (CW) implantation with the standard treatment for adult-type diffuse gliomas is safe and has a prognostic impact. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value and safety of CW implantation.

METHODS

Adult patients with IDH-wild-type and -mutant gliomas, grades 3-4 treated with surgical resection, radiotherapy, and temozolomide chemotherapy between 2013 and 2023 were surveyed. CWs were implanted except in cases of intraoperative wide ventricle opening or marked preoperative brain swelling. For survival analyses, a case-matched dataset based on propensity score matching (PSM), including multiple factors (patient background, diagnosis, and extent of resection) was generated. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and frequency of complications of CW implantation (brain edema, infection, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage) were compared between the CW and non-use groups.

RESULTS

In total, 127 patients (75 in the CW use group and 52 in the non-use group) were enrolled. Regardless of stratification, no significant differences in PFS and OS were observed between the CW use and non-use groups. The frequency of postoperative brain edema was significantly higher in the CW use group than in the non-use group. An adjusted dataset containing 41 patients in the CW use and nonuse groups was generated. Even after PSM, CW implantation had no prognostic effect.

CONCLUSIONS

CW implantation with standard treatment demonstrated little beneficial effect for the present strategy of CW use.

Efficacy and Safety of Carmustine Wafer Implantation After Ventricular Opening in Glioblastomas, Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Wildtype, in Adults

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We assessed the impact of ventricular opening on postoperative complications and survival of carmustine wafer implantation during surgery of newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastomas, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype in adults.

METHODS

We performed an observational, retrospective, single-center cohort study at a tertiary surgical neuro-oncological center between January 2006 and December 2021.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-four patients who benefited from a first-line surgical resection with carmustine wafer implantation were included. Seventy patients (36.1%) had a ventricular opening. We showed that ventricular opening (1) did not increase overall postoperative complication rates (P = .201); (2) did not worsen the early postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score (P = .068); (3) did not increase the time interval from surgery to adjuvant oncological treatment (P = .458); (4) did not affect the completion of the standard radiochemotherapy protocol (P = .164); (5) did not affect progression-free survival (P = .059); and (6) did not affect overall survival (P = .142).

CONCLUSION

In this study, ventricular opening during first-line surgical resection did not affect the survival and postoperative complications after use of carmustine wafer implantation in adult patients with a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. This warrants a prospective and multicentric study to clearly assess the impact of the ventricular opening after carmustine wafer implantation in glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype.

Application of intraoperative radiotherapy for malignant glioma

Malignant glioma is characterized by rapid tumor cell proliferation and high recurrence risk. In terms of its treatment, the therapeutic effects of maximum resection and postoperative radiotherapy with adjuvant chemotherapy as well as many other new therapeutic techniques such as antiangiogenic therapy and immunotherapy remain poor. Glioma recurrence, especially local recurrence, is an important reason of glioma treatment failure. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) enables exclusion of radiation-sensitive normal tissue from the radiation field in operation and then the application of a single high-dose precision irradiation to the residual tumor or tumor bed. IORT has great application potential in the control of local recurrence of malignant tumors. This paper thus aims to review the current status and prospects of IORT's application in malignant glioma treatment.

Machine learning to improve interpretability of clinical, radiological and panel-based genomic data of glioma grade 4 patients undergoing surgical resection

BACKGROUND

Glioma grade 4 (GG4) tumors, including astrocytoma IDH-mutant grade 4 and the astrocytoma IDH wt are the most common and aggressive primary tumors of the central nervous system. Surgery followed by Stupp protocol still remains the first-line treatment in GG4 tumors. Although Stupp combination can prolong survival, prognosis of treated adult patients with GG4 still remains unfavorable. The introduction of innovative multi-parametric prognostic models may allow refinement of prognosis of these patients. Here, Machine Learning (ML) was applied to investigate the contribution in predicting overall survival (OS) of different available data (e.g. clinical data, radiological data, or panel-based sequencing data such as presence of somatic mutations and amplification) in a mono-institutional GG4 cohort.

METHODS

By next-generation sequencing, using a panel of 523 genes, we performed analysis of copy number variations and of types and distribution of nonsynonymous mutations in 102 cases including 39 carmustine wafer (CW) treated cases. We also calculated tumor mutational burden (TMB). ML was applied using eXtreme Gradient Boosting for survival (XGBoost-Surv) to integrate clinical and radiological information with genomic data.

RESULTS

By ML modeling (concordance (c)- index = 0.682 for the best model), the role of predicting OS of radiological parameters including extent of resection, preoperative volume and residual volume was confirmed. An association between CW application and longer OS was also showed. Regarding gene mutations, a role in predicting OS was defined for mutations of BRAF and of other genes involved in the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway. Moreover, an association between high TMB and shorter OS was suggested. Consistently, when a cutoff of 1.7 mutations/megabase was applied, cases with higher TMB showed significantly shorter OS than cases with lower TMB.

CONCLUSIONS

The contribution of tumor volumetric data, somatic gene mutations and TBM in predicting OS of GG4 patients was defined by ML modeling.

Carmustine wafer implantation for supratentorial glioblastomas, IDH-wildtype in "extreme" neurosurgical conditions

We assessed the feasibility of Carmustine wafer implantation in "extreme" conditions (i.e. patients > 80 years and Karnofsky Performance Status score < 50) and of implantation ≥ 12 Carmustine wafers in adult patients harbouring a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. We performed an observational, retrospective single-centre cohort study at a tertiary surgical neuro-oncological centre between January 2006 and December 2021. Four hundred eighty patients who benefited from a surgical resection at first-line treatment were included. We showed that Carmustine wafer implantation in patients > 80 years, in patients with a Karnofsky performance status score < 50, and that implantation ≥ 12 Carmustine wafers (1) did not increase overall postoperative complication rates, (2) did not affect the completion of standard radiochemotherapy protocol, (3) did not worsen the postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status scores, and (4) did not significantly affect the time to oncological treatment. We showed that the implantation of ≥ 12 Carmustine wafers improved progression-free survival (31.0 versus 10.0 months, p = 0.025) and overall survival (39.0 versus 16.5 months, p = 0.041) without increasing postoperative complication rates. Carmustine wafer implantation during the surgical resection of a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype is safe and efficient in patients > 80 years and in patients with preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score < 50. The number of Carmustine wafers should be adapted (up to 16 in our experience) to the resection cavity to improve survival without increasing postoperative overall complication rates.

Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Glioma Surgery with Carmustine Wafers Implantation. A Long-Term Nationwide Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Widespread use of carmustine wafers (CWs) to treat high-grade gliomas (HGG) has been limited by uncertainties about their efficacy. We sought to assess the outcome of patients after newly diagnosed HGG surgery with CW implantation and search for associated factors.

METHODS

We processed the French medico-administrative national database between 2008 and 2019 to retrieve ad hoc cases. Survival methods were implemented.

RESULTS

In total, 1608 patients who had CW implantation after HGG resection at 42 different institutions between 2008 and 2019 were identified; 36.7% were female and, median age at HGG resection with CW implantation was 61.5 years, interquartile range (IQR) [52.9-69.1]. A total of 1460 patients (90.8%) had died at data collection at a median age at death of 63.5 years, IQR [55.3-71.2]. Median overall survival (OS) was 1.42 years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.49, i.e., 16.8 months. Median age at death was 63.5 years, IQR [55.3-71.2]. OS at 1, 2, and, 5 years was 67.4%, 95% CI 65.1-69.7; 33.1%, 95% CI 30.9-35.5; and 10.7%, 95% CI 9.2-12.4, respectively. In the adjusted regression, sex (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.92, P < 0.001), age at HGG surgery with CW implantation (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.02-1.03, P < 0.001), adjuvant radiotherapy (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.7-0.86, P < 0.001), chemotherapy by temozolomide (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.63-0.79, P < 0.001), and redo surgery for HGG recurrence (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.94, P = 0.005) remained significantly associated with the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

OS of patients with newly diagnosed HGG who underwent surgery with CW implantation is better in young patients, those of the female sex, and for those who complete concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Redo surgery for HGG recurrence also was associated with prolonged survival.

Surgical management of Glioma Grade 4: technical update from the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®): a systematic review

PURPOSE

The extent of resection (EOR) is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in adult patients with Glioma Grade 4 (GG4). The aim of the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®) was to provide a general overview of the current trends and technical tools to reach this goal.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed. The results were divided and ordered, by an expert team of surgeons, to assess the Class of Evidence (CE) and Strength of Recommendation (SR) of perioperative drugs management, imaging, surgery, intraoperative imaging, estimation of EOR, surgery at tumor progression and surgery in elderly patients.

RESULTS

A total of 352 studies were identified, including 299 retrospective studies and 53 reviews/meta-analysis. The use of Dexamethasone and the avoidance of prophylaxis with anti-seizure medications reached a CE I and SR A. A preoperative imaging standard protocol was defined with CE II and SR B and usefulness of an early postoperative MRI, with CE II and SR B. The EOR was defined the strongest independent risk factor for both OS and tumor recurrence with CE II and SR B. For intraoperative imaging only the use of 5-ALA reached a CE II and SR B. The estimation of EOR was established to be fundamental in planning postoperative adjuvant treatments with CE II and SR B and the stereotactic image-guided brain biopsy to be the procedure of choice when an extensive surgical resection is not feasible (CE II and SR B).

CONCLUSIONS

A growing number of evidences evidence support the role of maximal safe resection as primary OS predictor in GG4 patients. The ongoing development of intraoperative techniques for a precise real-time identification of peritumoral functional pathways enables surgeons to maximize EOR minimizing the post-operative morbidity.

Medical Device Advances in the Treatment of Glioblastoma

Despite decades of research and the growing emergence of new treatment modalities, Glioblastoma (GBM) frustratingly remains an incurable brain cancer with largely stagnant 5-year survival outcomes of around 5%. Historically, a significant challenge has been the effective delivery of anti-cancer treatment. This review aims to summarize key innovations in the field of medical devices, developed either to improve the delivery of existing treatments, for example that of chemo-radiotherapy, or provide novel treatments using devices, such as sonodynamic therapy, thermotherapy and electric field therapy. It will highlight current as well as emerging device technologies, non-invasive versus invasive approaches, and by doing so provide a detailed summary of evidence from clinical studies and trials undertaken to date. Potential limitations and current challenges are discussed whilst also highlighting the exciting potential of this developing field. It is hoped that this review will serve as a useful primer for clinicians, scientists, and engineers in the field, united by a shared goal to translate medical device innovations to help improve treatment outcomes for patients with this devastating disease.

Advances in Preclinical/Clinical Glioblastoma Treatment: Can Nanoparticles Be of Help?

Simple Summary

As one of the most lethal human cancers, glioblastoma treatment is a real challenge because of several resistance mechanisms, including limited drug entry into the central nervous system through the blood–brain barrier and the vast heterogeneity of this family of tumors. In the development of precision medicine, various nanoconstructs are being proposed to cross the BBB, specifically target GB tumors, release the therapeutic cargo in a controlled manner, and reduce therapeutic resistance. This review summarizes the different families of nanoparticles and approaches followed so far pursuing these aims.

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GB) is the most aggressive and frequent primary malignant tumor in the central nervous system (CNS), with unsatisfactory and challenging treatment nowadays. Current standard of care includes surgical resection followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, these treatments do not much improve the overall survival of GB patients, which is still below two years (the 5-year survival rate is below 7%). Despite various approaches having been followed to increase the release of anticancer drugs into the brain, few of them demonstrated a significant success, as the blood brain barrier (BBB) still restricts its uptake, thus limiting the therapeutic options. Therefore, enormous efforts are being devoted to the development of novel nanomedicines with the ability to cross the BBB and specifically target the cancer cells. In this context, the use of nanoparticles represents a promising non-invasive route, allowing to evade BBB and reducing systemic concentration of drugs and, hence, side effects. In this review, we revise with a critical view the different families of nanoparticles and approaches followed so far with this aim.

The MBNL1/circNTRK2/PAX5 pathway regulates aerobic glycolysis in glioblastoma cells by encoding a novel protein NTRK2-243aa

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common tumor of the human central nervous system. Aerobic glycolysis has been strongly related to tumor development and malignant behavior. In this study, we found that MBNL1, circNTRK2, and NTRK2-243aa were markedly downregulated and inhibited glycolysis in GBM, whereas PAX5 was upregulated and promoted glycolysis. Functionally, MBNL1 promoted the expression of circNTRK2 by binding to NTRK2 pre-mRNA, as validated using RNA pull-down and nascent RNA immunoprecipitation assays. Mass spectrometry, western blotting, and immunofluorescence staining methods were used to detect the expression of NTRK2-243aa. NTRK2-243aa-encoded by circNTRK2-phosphorylated PAX5 at Y102, leading to the attenuation of the half-life of PAX5, as validated by in vitro kinase and MG132 rescue assays. Besides, PAX5 transcriptionally facilitated the expression of PKM2 and HK2 by binding to their promoter regions, as verified by luciferase reporter and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. Finally, overexpression of MBNL1 and circNTRK2 combined with PAX5 knockdown effectively inhibited the formation of GBM xenograft tumors and significantly prolonged the survival of orthotopic nude mice. We have delineated that the MBNL1/circNTRK2/PAX5 pathway plays a crucial role in regulating GBM glycolysis and could provide potential targets and alternative strategies for the treatment of GBM.

Ventricular opening and cerebrospinal fluid circulation accelerate the biodegradation process of carmustine wafers suggesting their immunomodulation potential in the human brain

PURPOSE

Opening the ventricular system during glioblastoma surgery is often necessary, but the consequent effect on the tumor microenvironment of glioblastoma remains unknown. Implantation of carmustine wafer enables direct drug delivery to the tumor site; however, the exact mechanism of the wafer's biodegradation process is unclear, and the available data is limited to in vivo non-human mammalian studies. We hypothesized that the ventricular opening affects the degradation process of the wafer and the glioblastoma tumor microenvironment.

METHODS

This study included 30 glioblastoma patients. 21 patients underwent carmustine wafer implantation during initial surgery. All patients underwent repeated surgical resection upon recurrence, allowing for pathological comparison of changes associated with wafer implantation. Immunohistochemical analyses were performed using CD68, TMEM119, CD163, IBA1, BIN1, and CD31 antibodies to highlight microglia, macrophages, and tumor vascularity, and the quantitative scoring results were correlated with clinical, molecular, and surgical variables, including the effect of the ventricular opening.

RESULTS

The carmustine wafer implanted group presented significantly less TMEM119-positive microglia within the tumor (P = 0.0002). Simple and multiple regression analyses revealed that the decrease in TMEM119-positive microglia was correlated with longer intervals between surgeries and opened ventricular systems. No correlation was observed between age, methylated O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase promoter expression, and the extent of surgical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study findings strongly suggest that biomaterials may possess immunomodulation capacity, which is significantly impacted by the ventricular opening procedure. Furthermore, our data highlights the pathophysiological effects of the ventricular opening within the surrounding human brain, especially after the wafer implantation.

Carmustine Wafers Implantation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma: Is It Still an Option?

Background

The implantation protocol for Carmustine Wafers (CWs) in high grade glioma (HGG) was developed to offer a bridge between surgical resection and adjuvant treatments, such as radio- and chemotherapy. In the last years, however, a widespread use of CWs has been limited due to uncertainties regarding efficacy, in addition to increased risk of infection and elevated costs of treatment.

Objective

The aims of our study were to investigate the epidemiology of patients that underwent surgery for HGG with CW implantation, in addition to the assessment of related complications, long-term overall survival (OS), and associated prognostic factors.

Methods

Three different medical databases were screened for conducting a systematic review of the literature, according to the PRISMA statement guidelines, evaluating the role of BCNU wafer implantation in patients with newly diagnosed HGG. The search query was based on a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH): “high grade glioma” [MeSH] AND “Carmustine” [MeSH] and free text terms: “surgery” OR “BCNU wafer” OR “Gliadel” OR “systemic treatment options” OR “overall survival.”

Results

The analysis of the meta-data demonstrated that there was a significant advantage in using CWs in newly diagnosed GBM in terms of OS, and a very low heterogeneity among the included studies [mean difference 2.64 (95% CI 0.85, 4.44); p = 0.004; I2149 = 0%]. Conversely, no significant difference between the two treatment groups in terms of PFS wad detected (p = 0.55). The analysis of complications showed a relatively higher rate in Carmustine implanted patients, although this difference was not significant (p = 0.53).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis seems to suggest that CWs implantation plays a significant role in improving the OS, when used in patients with newly diagnosed HGG. To minimize the risk of side effects, however, a carful patient selection based mainly on patient age and tumor volume should be desirable.

Management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: current state of the art and emerging therapeutic approaches

Glioblastoma multiforme represent > 50% of primary gliomas and have five year survival rates of ~ 5%. Maximal safe surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide remains the standard treatment since published by Stupp et al. (in N Engl J Med 352:987-996, 2005), with additional benefit for patients with MGMT-methylated tumors. We review the current treatment landscape and ongoing efforts to improve these outcomes. An extensive literature search of Pubmed and Google Scholar involving the search terms "glioblastoma," "glioblastoma multiforme," or "GBM" for papers published to July 2021 was conducted and papers evaluated for relevance. As well as current data that informs clinical practice, we review ongoing clinical research in both newly diagnosed and recurrent settings that provides hope for a breakthrough. The Stupp protocol remains standard of care in 2021. Addition of tumor treating fields improved mOS modestly, with benefit seen in MGMT-methylated and unmethylated cohorts and also improved time to cognitive decline but has not been widely adopted. The addition of lomustine to temozolomide, in MGMT-methylated patients, also showed a mOS benefit but further investigation is required. Other promising therapeutic strategies including anti-angiogenic therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy have yet to show a survival advantage. Improvements in the multidisciplinary management, surgical techniques and equipment, early palliative care, carrier support, and psychological support may be responsible for improving survival over time. Despite promising preclinical rationale, immunotherapy and targeted therapy are struggling to impact survival. A number of ongoing clinical trials provide hope for a breakthrough.

Radiotherapy for glioblastoma: clinical issues and nanotechnology strategies

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain cancer in adults with poor prognosis. Despite the current state of knowledge on its genetic characteristics, relatively little progress has been made in improving the treatment of patients with this fatal disease. Radiotherapy (RT) has been identified as a crucial treatment for GBM following surgical resection to improve both local control and survival. Unfortunately, radiotherapy resistance is frequently observed in GBM patients, which is the major reason for the high mortality rate of cancer patients. Radioresistance of GBM is often multifactorial and heterogeneous, and associated with the recurrence of GBM after surgery. Nanotechnology has gained increasing attention and has already been investigated for optimization of radiosensitization due to the unique properties of nanobiomaterials, such as photoelectric decay characteristics or potential as carriers for drug delivery to the central nervous system. A large body of preclinical data has accumulated over the past several years, in which nanotechnology-based strategies exhibit promising potential to enhance the radiosensitivity of GBM, both in cellular and animal models. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms of GBM radioresistance, including tumor cell-intrinsic factors as well as tumor microenvironment (TME). We further discuss current nano-biotechnology-based radiosensitizer in the treatment of GBM, summarize the latest findings, highlight challenges, and put forward prospects for the future of nano-radiosensitizers. These data suggest that nanotechnology has the potential to address many of the clinical challenges and nanobiomaterials would become promising next-generation radiotherapy sensitizers for GBM treatment.

MiRNA-181d expression correlates in tumor versus plasma of glioblastoma patients - the base of a preoperative stratification tool for local carmustine wafer use

OBJECTIVE

Patients with low micro-RNA-181d level in glioblastoma tissue benefit most of carmustine wafer use. The study compares preoperative miRNA-181d plasma and tumor expression. This may form the base to decide, from a preoperative blood test, if carmustine wafer implantation is recommendable.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients suffering from glioblastoma treated between 2018 and 2020 were enrolled prospectively. Preoperatively, blood was drawn; and the plasma was isolated. Tumor specimens were collected. Blood samples from 30 healthy individuals served as a reference. Micro-RNA-181d expression in plasma and tumor were acquired as fold change, using qRT-PCR. Results were correlated with relevant demographic, clinical and histopathologic aspects of the cohort. Further factors like tumour volume as well as blood panel results were considered. A TCGA analysis was performed to investigate specific miRNA-181d - protein interactions to elude how miRNA-181 impact therapy response to carmustine.

RESULTS

Patients with glioblastoma showed a significant overexpression of miRNA-181d compared to healthy individuals (p = 0.029). There was a significant correlation between miRNA-181d expression in tumor tissue and plasma (p = 0.001, R = 0.51). Sensitivity of low miRNA-181d expression in plasma predicting low miRNA-181d tumor expression was 76.6%. Tumor volume, preoperative medication as well as items of blood panel analysis did not influence the prognostic value of plasma miRNA-181d expression. TCGA analysis revealed eight potential protein targets to be regulated by miRNA-181d.

CONCLUSION

miRNA-181d seems to be a potential molecular marker which can reliably be detected in blood samples of glioblastoma patients. It should therefore prospectively be evaluated as a potential preoperative prognostic marker regarding carmustine wafer implantation.

Discriminating surgical bed cysts from bacterial brain abscesses after Carmustine wafer implantation in newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastomas

Carmustine wafers can be implanted in the surgical bed of high-grade gliomas, which can induce surgical bed cyst formation, leading to clinically relevant mass effect. An observational retrospective monocentric study was conducted including 122 consecutive adult patients with a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma who underwent a surgical resection with Carmustine wafer implantation as first line treatment (2005-2018). Twenty-two patients (18.0%) developed a postoperative contrast-enhancing cyst within the surgical bed: 16 surgical bed cysts and six bacterial abscesses. All patients with a surgical bed cyst were managed conservatively, all resolved on imaging follow-up, and no patient stopped the radiochemotherapy. Independent risk factors of formation of a postoperative surgical bed cyst were age ≥ 60 years (p = 0.019), number of Carmustine wafers implanted ≥ 8 (p = 0.040), and partial resection (p = 0.025). Compared to surgical bed cysts, the occurrence of a postoperative bacterial abscess requiring surgical management was associated more frequently with a shorter time to diagnosis from surgery (p = 0.009), new neurological deficit (p < 0.001), fever (p < 0.001), residual air in the cyst (p = 0.018), a cyst diameter greater than that of the initial tumor (p = 0.027), and increased mass effect and brain edema compared to early postoperative MRI (p = 0.024). Contrast enhancement (p = 0.473) and diffusion signal abnormalities (p = 0.471) did not differ between postoperative bacterial abscesses and surgical bed cysts. Clinical and imaging findings help discriminate between surgical bed cysts and bacterial abscesses following Carmustine wafer implantation. Surgical bed cysts can be managed conservatively. Individual risk factors will help tailor their steroid therapy and imaging follow-up.

Implantation of Carmustine wafers after resection of malignant glioma with and without opening of the ventricular system

OBJECTIVE

Implantation of biodegradable Carmustine wafers in patients with malignant glioma is not generally recommended when the ventricular system is opened during tumor resection. Thrombin/fibrinogenn-covered collagen fleeces showed promising results in sufficiently closing ventricular defects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative morbidity in patients with implanted Carmustine wafers either with opened or intact ventricular system.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients who underwent resection of malignant glioma with implantation of Carmustine wafers was analyzed. In case of opening of the ventricular system, the defect in the ventricle wall was sealed using a collagen sponge coated with fibrinogen and thrombin prior to the implantation of the wafers. Postoperative adverse events (AE) and Karnofsky performance status scale (KPS) at follow up were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were included. The ventricular system was opened in 33 patients and remained intact in 21 patients. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, rate of primary and recurrent glioma, preoperative KPS, rate of gross total resection and number of implanted wafers. Postoperative AEs occurred in 9/33 patients (27.3%) with opened and in 5/21 patients (23.8%) with intact ventricular system (p = 0.13). At follow-up assessments, KPS was not significantly different between both groups (p = 0.18). Opened ventricular system was not associated with a higher incidence of postoperative AEs (p = 0.98).

CONCLUSION

Appropriate closure of opened ventricular system during resection of malignant glioma allows for a safe implantation of Carmustine wafers and is not associated with a higher incidence of postoperative AEs.

Breaching the Blood-Brain Tumor Barrier for Tumor Therapy

Tumors affecting the central nervous system (CNS), either primary or secondary, are highly prevalent and represent an unmet medical need. Prognosis of these tumors remains poor, mostly due to the low intrinsic chemo/radio-sensitivity of tumor cells, a meagerly known role of the microenvironment and the poor CNS bioavailability of most used anti-cancer agents. The BBTB is the main obstacle for anticancer drugs to achieve therapeutic concentrations in the tumor tissues. During the last decades, many efforts have been devoted to the identification of modalities allowing to increase drug delivery into brain tumors. Until recently, success has been modest, as few of these approaches reached clinical testing and even less gained regulatory approval. In recent years, the scenario has changed, as various conjugates and drug delivery technologies have advanced into clinical testing, with encouraging results and without being burdened by a heavy adverse event profile. In this article, we review the different approaches aimed at increasing drug delivery to brain tumors, with particular attention to new, promising approaches that increase the permeability of the BBTB or exploit physiological transport mechanisms.

Spatiotemporal combination of thermosensitive polypeptide fused interferon and temozolomide for post-surgical glioblastoma immunochemotherapy

Cancer recurrence post surgical resection is of considerable challenge especially in glioblastoma (GBM) therapy. Herein, we demonstrate that interferon-alpha (IFN) fused to a body temperature-sensitive elastin-like polypeptide (IFN-ELP(V)) formed a depot in situ when injected into GBM resection cavity in a mouse brain orthotopic model of GBM. Notably, IFN-ELP(V) in the depot showed a zero-order release kinetics, resulting in dramatically improved pharmacokinetics and biodistribution, and thus inhibited GBM recurrence by stimulating antitumor immunoresponse as compared to IFN. More importantly, when combined with subsequent intraperitoneal injection of temozolomide (TMZ), IFN-ELP(V) could much more effectively suppress post-surgical GBM recurrence than IFN, leading to a remarkably enhanced GBM-free survival rate (60%) over IFN (12.5%). Our findings implicate that the spatiotemporally-programmed combination of IFN-ELP(V) and TMZ leads to the synergy of post-surgical GBM immunochemotherapy, thereby providing a new and effective strategy for cancer therapy.

Carmustine as a Supplementary Therapeutic Option for Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive type of primary malignant brain tumor. Carmustine is used by intravenous injection or local implantation in the resection cavity for gliomas, including GBMs. However, the therapeutic potential of carmustine is not well-recognized. This analysis aimed to evaluate the survival benefits of carmustine in glioma patients, especially those with GBM. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies regarding carmustine for glioma treatment were searched in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase from January 1979 to March 2020. Quality assessment was conducted with Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa scales (NOS). Statistical analysis was conducted by the Revman 5.3 software. Results: Twenty-two eligible RCTs and cohort studies involving 5,821 glioma patients were included. Overall, glioma patients receiving carmustine as an adjuvant therapy had better progression-free survival [PFS; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.77-0.94, P = 0.002] and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79-0.92, P < 0.0001) than those without carmustine treatment. Subgroup analysis showed that the OS benefit was observed in GBM (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.78-0.91, P < 0.00001) but not in anaplastic glioma patients (HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.70-2.07, P = 0.50). Additionally, both newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM patients who received carmustine treatment showed better OS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.79-0.95, P = 0.002; HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.67-0.89, P = 0.0002, respectively). Both carmustine implantation in resection cavity and intravenous administration significantly prolonged OS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.78-0.92, P < 0.0001; HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99, P = 0.04, respectively). Moreover, GBM patients receiving a combined carmustine and temozolomide (TMZ) therapy had longer OS than those receiving TMZ alone (HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.63-0.97, P = 0.03). Conclusion: Carmustine implantation in resection cavity provides survival benefit for GBM patients, and it may be a promising supplement to standard therapeutic protocol by offering a bridge between surgical resection and onset of TMZ therapy.

Management of glioblastoma: State of the art and future directions

Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor. Overall, the prognosis for patients with this disease is poor, with a median survival of <2 years. There is a slight predominance in males, and incidence increases with age. The standard approach to therapy in the newly diagnosed setting includes surgery followed by concurrent radiotherapy with temozolomide and further adjuvant temozolomide. Tumor-treating fields, delivering low-intensity alternating electric fields, can also be given concurrently with adjuvant temozolomide. At recurrence, there is no standard of care; however, surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy with chemotherapy or bevacizumab are all potential options, depending on the patient's circumstances. Supportive and palliative care remain important considerations throughout the disease course in the multimodality approach to management. The recently revised classification of glioblastoma based on molecular profiling, notably isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status, is a result of enhanced understanding of the underlying pathogenesis of disease. There is a clear need for better therapeutic options, and there have been substantial efforts exploring immunotherapy and precision oncology approaches. In contrast to other solid tumors, however, biological factors, such as the blood-brain barrier and the unique tumor and immune microenvironment, represent significant challenges in the development of novel therapies. Innovative clinical trial designs with biomarker-enrichment strategies are needed to ultimately improve the outcome of patients with glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma: from volumetric analysis to molecular predictors

BACKGROUND

Despite decades of therapeutic and molecular refinements, the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) still remains unfavorable. Integrative clinical studies allow a better understanding of the natural evolution of GBM. To assess independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) clinical, surgical, molecular and radiological variables were evaluated. A novel preoperative volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) index for tumor prognosis in GBM patients was investigated.

METHODS

A cohort of 195 cases of patients operated for newly GBM were analyzed. Extent of tumoral resection (EOR), tumor growth pattern, expressed by preoperative volumetric ΔT1-T2 MRI index, molecular markers such as O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/2) mutation, were analyzed. Analysis of survival was done using Cox-proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

The 1-, 2- years estimated OS and PFS rate for the whole population were 61% and 27%, 38% and 17%, respectively. A better survival rate, both in terms of survival and tumor progression, was observed in patient with higher EOR (p=0.000), younger age (p=0.000), MGMT methylation status (p=0.001) and lower preoperative ΔT1-T2 MRI index (p=0.004). Regarding the tumor growth pattern a cut-off value of 0.75 was found to discriminate patient with different prognosis. Patients with a preoperative ΔT1-T2 MRI index <0.75 had a 1-year estimated OS of 67%, otherwise patients with a preoperative ΔT1-T2 MRI index >0.75 hada 1-year estimated OS of 34%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this investigation longer survival is associated with younger age, EOR, promoter methylation of MGMT and preoperative tumor volumetric features expressed by ΔT1-T2 MRI index. The preoperative ΔT1-T2 MRI index could be a promising prognostic factor potentially useful in GBM management. Future investigations based on multiparametric MRI data and next generation sequences analysis, may better clarify this result.

Implantation of carmustine wafers (Gliadel®) for high-grade glioma treatment. A 9-year nationwide retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Carmustine wafers (CW) are approved to treat newly or recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGG). Widespread use has been limited regarding some doubtful uncertainties about their efficacy, related increased risk of infection and expensive cost.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the epidemiology of CW implantation, search for related complications, long-term survival and associated prognostic factors.

METHODS

We processed the French medico-administrative national database to retrieve appropriate cases operated between 2010 and 2018. A survival analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

We identified 1659 patients treated in 39 institutions. Median age at CW implantation was 61 years and there was an over-representation of male (63.5%). 491 patients (29.6%) had previous diagnosis of glioma. Time between the first surgery and CW implantation was 0.9 years, IQR[0.6, 1.6]. The frontal lobe was the most frequently involved 29%. 131 patients (7.9%) had to be re operated on for a complication of which 121 for surgical site infection. At one year, 514 patients (31%) had died. Median overall survival (OS) was 1.4 years, _95% CI [1.3, 1.5]. OS at 1 and 2 year was 66%, _95%CI [63.7, 68.5], 32.3%, _95%CI [29.9, 35]. In the adjusted Cox regression, male gender & age at CW implantation were established as independent factors of OS in all three groups. Patients with recurrent HGG have a significant worse prognosis (HR = 0.71, _95% CI [0.62, 0.80] p < 0.001). A post-operative diagnosis of infection or intracranial bleeding eventually leading to a redo surgery was not associated with a decrease OS.

CONCLUSION

Over the past 9 years, there is a significant decrease utilisation of CW in France. OS after CW implantation is significantly variable as influenced by many factors such as age, gender or recurrent disease but not by post-operative complications. Compare to previous results, CW may increase the OS and this effect seems more pronounced when adjuvant RT/TMZ is given.

miRNA-26a expression influences the therapy response to carmustine wafer implantation in patients with glioblastoma multiforme

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma multiforme is the most frequent malignant brain tumor in adults being marked with a very poor prognosis. Therapy concept implies concomitant radio-chemotherapy and facultative implantation of carmustine-eluted wafer. Current literature suggests microRNA 26a expression in glioblastoma to interact with alkylating chemotherapy. Subsequently, the aim of this study was to investigate the correlation of miRNA-26a expression and carmustine wafer implantation and its potential usefulness as a predictive marker for therapy response.

METHODS

In total, 229 patients with glioblastoma multiforme were included into the final analysis. Of them, 80 cases were recruited from the Saarland University Medical Center for a retrospective matched-pair analysis stratified after therapy regime: One group (carmustine wafer group; n=40) received concomitant radio-chemotherapy with carmustine wafer implantation. The other group (control group; n=40) only received concomitant radio-chemotherapy. The results were confirmed by comparing them with an independent dataset of 149 patients from the TCGA database. All tumor specimens were evaluated for miRNA-26a expression, MGMT promoter methylation, and IDH1 R132H mutation status, and the results were correlated with the clinical data.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients in the carmustine wafer group showed low expression of miRNA-26a, while 17 patients showed a high expression. In the control group, 28 patients showed low expression, while 12 patients showed a high expression. The patients with high miRNA-26a expression in the carmustine wafer group were characterized by a significantly longer overall (hazard ratio [HR] 2.750 [95% CI 1.352-5.593]; p=0.004) and progression-free survival (HR 3.091 [95% CI 1.436-6.657]; p=0.003) than patients with low miRNA-26a expression. The 17 patients in the carmustine wafer group with high miRNA-26a expression showed a significantly longer progression-free survival (p=0.013) and overall survival (p=0.007) compared with the control group. There were no such correlations identified within the control group. TCGA datasets supported these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

MiRNA-26a expression turned out to be a promising predictor of therapy response and clinical outcome in glioblastoma patients treated with carmustine wafer implantation. For evaluation of the role of miRNA-26a in a combined therapy setting, further studies are needed in order to translate general findings to the patient's individual situation.

Association of patterns of care, prognostic factors, and use of radiotherapy-temozolomide therapy with survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a French national population-based study

Background

Glioblastoma is the most frequent primary malignant brain tumor. In daily practice and at whole country level, oncological care management for glioblastoma patients is not completely known.

Objectives

To describe oncological patterns of care, prognostic factors, and survival for all patients in France with newly-diagnosed and histologically confirmed glioblastoma, and evaluate the impact of extended temozolomide use at the population level.

Methods

Nationwide population-based cohort study including all patients with newly-diagnosed and histologically confirmed glioblastoma in France in 2008 and followed until 2015.

Results

Data from 2053 glioblastoma patients were analyzed (male/female ratio 1.5, median age 64 years). Median overall survival (OS) was 11.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.7–11.9] months. The first-line therapy and corresponding median survival (MS, in months) were: 13% did not receive any oncological treatment (biopsy only) (MS = 1.8, 95% CI 1.6–2.1), 27% received treatment without the combination of radiotherapy (RT)–temozolomide (MS = 5.9, 95% CI 5.5–6.6), 60% received treatment including the initiation of the concomitant phase of RT–temozolomide (MS = 16.4, 95% CI 15.2–17.4) whom 44% of patients initiated the temozolomide adjuvant phase (MS = 18.9, 95% CI 18.0–19.8). Only 22% patients received 6 cycles or more of adjuvant temozolomide (MS = 25.5, 95% CI 24.0–28.3). The multivariate analysis showed that the risk of mortality was significantly higher for the non-progressive patients who stopped at 6 cycles (standard protocol) than those who continued the treatment, hazard ratio = 1.5 (95% CI 1.2–1.9).

Conclusion

In non-progressive patients, prolonging the adjuvant temozolomide beyond 6 cycles may improve OS.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11060-018-03065-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy, Quo Vadis?

The treatment of malignancies has undergone dramatic changes in the past few decades. Advances in drug delivery techniques and nanotechnology have allowed for new formulations of old drugs, so as to improve the pharmacokinetics, to enhance accumulation in solid tumors, and to reduce the significant toxic effects of these important therapeutic agents. Here, we review the published clinical data in cancer therapy of several major drug delivery systems, including targeted radionuclide therapy, antibody-drug conjugates, liposomes, polymer-drug conjugates, polymer implants, micelles, and nanoparticles. The clinical outcomes of these delivery systems from various phases of clinical trials are summarized. The success and limitations of the drug delivery strategies are discussed based on the clinical observations. In addition, the challenges in applying drug delivery for efficacious cancer therapy, including physical barriers, tumor heterogeneity, drug resistance, and metastasis, are discussed along with future perspectives of drug delivery in cancer therapy. In doing so, we intend to underscore that efficient delivery of cancer therapeutics to solid malignancies remains a major challenge in cancer therapy, and requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates knowledge from the diverse fields of chemistry, biology, engineering, and medicine. The overall objective of this review is to improve our understanding of the clinical fate of commonly investigated drug delivery strategies, and to identify the limitations that must be addressed in future drug delivery strategies, toward the pursuit of curative therapies for cancer.

Immunotherapies for malignant glioma

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly malignant primary brain cancer with a dreadful overall survival and for which treatment options are limited. Recent breakthroughs in novel immune-related treatment strategies for cancer have spurred interests in usurping the power of the patient's immune system to recognize and eliminate GBM. Here, we discuss the unique properties of GBM's tumor microenvironment, the effects of GBM standard on care therapy on tumor-associated immune cells, and review several approaches aimed at therapeutically targeting the immune system for GBM treatment. We believe that a comprehensive understanding of the intricate micro-environmental landscape of GBM will abound into the development of novel immunotherapy strategies for GBM patients.

Combining Clinical and Molecular Data to Predict the Benefits of Carmustine Wafers in Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Gliomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the use of carmustine wafers (CWs) in the management of high-grade gliomas (HGGs). The data from our monoinstitutional series was compared with studies reported in the literature. Special emphasis was placed on the evaluation of side effects and the analysis of extent of resection and molecular profile as risk factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

The implantation of CWs into the resection cavity during HGG treatment to deliver localized chemotherapy, followed by the Stupp protocol, remains debated in a clinical setting, largely due to the lack of appropriate phase III studies. Given the high expense and poorly characterized side effects associated with CW treatment, identification of patients most likely to benefit from this therapy could be clinically relevant. CWs may represent an effective and safe first-line treatment for patients with HGG that exhibit complete tumor resection and harboring a methylated MGMT promoter. Our investigation showed a much larger group of patients exhibiting long-term survival (> = 36 months), strongly supporting a potential survival benefit conferred via CW treatment. The pre-surgical definition of the MGMT promoter status could be of clinical use in identifying "good responders" to CW implantation.

Incomplete copolymer degradation of in situ chemotherapy

In situ carmustine wafers containing 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) are commonly used for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma to overcome the brain-blood barrier. In theory, this chemotherapy diffuses into the adjacent parenchyma and the excipient degrades in maximum 8 weeks but no clinical data confirms this evolution, because patients are rarely operated again. A 75-year-old patient was operated twice for recurrent glioblastoma, and a carmustine wafer was implanted during the second surgery. Eleven months later, a third surgery was performed, revealing unexpected incomplete degradation of the wafer. 1H-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance was performed to compare this wafer to pure BCNU and to an unused copolymer wafer. In the used wafer, peaks corresponding to hydrophobic units of the excipient were no longer noticeable, whereas peaks of the hydrophilic units and traces of BCNU were still present. These surprising results could be related to the formation of a hydrophobic membrane around the wafer, thus interfering with the expected diffusion and degradation processes. The clinical benefit of carmustine wafers in addition to the standard radio-chemotherapy remains limited, and in vivo behavior of this treatment is not completely elucidated yet. We found that the wafer may remain after several months. Alternative strategies to deal with the blood-brain barrier, such as drug-loaded liposomes or ultrasound-opening, must be explored to offer larger drug diffusion or allow repetitive delivery.

Carmustine wafer implantation for high-grade gliomas: Evidence-based safety efficacy and practical recommendations from the Neuro-oncology Club of the French Society of Neurosurgery

There is a growing body of evidence that carmustine wafer implantation during surgery is an effective therapeutic adjunct to the standard combined radio-chemotherapy regimen using temozolomide in newly diagnosed and recurrent high-grade glioma patient management with a statistically significant survival benefit demonstrated across several randomized clinical trials, as well as prospective and retrospective studies (grade A recommendation). Compelling clinical data also support the safety of carmustine wafer implantation (grade A recommendation) in these patients and suggest that observed adverse events can be avoided in experienced neurosurgeon hands. Furthermore, carmustine wafer implantation does not seem to impact negatively on the quality of life and the completion of adjuvant oncological treatments (grade C recommendation). Moreover, emerging findings support the potential of high-grade gliomas molecular status, especially the O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase promoter methylation status, in predicting the efficacy of such a surgical strategy, especially at recurrence (grade B recommendation). Finally, carmustine wafer implantation appears to be cost-effective in high-grade glioma patients when performed by an experienced team and when total or subtotal resection can be achieved. Altogether, these data underline the current need for a new randomized clinical trial to assess the impact of a maximal safe resection with carmustine wafer implantation followed by the standard combined chemoradiation protocol stratified by molecular status in high-grade glioma patients.

Rapid and accurate intraoperative pathological diagnosis by artificial intelligence with deep learning technology

Frozen section is widely used for intraoperative pathological diagnosis (IOPD), which is essential for intraoperative decision making. However, frozen section suffers from some drawbacks, such as time consuming and high misdiagnosis rate. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) with deep learning technology has shown bright future in medicine. We hypothesize that AI with deep learning technology could help IOPD, with a computer trained by a dataset of intraoperative lesion images. Evidences supporting our hypothesis included the successful use of AI with deep learning technology in diagnosing skin cancer, and the developed method of deep-learning algorithm. Large size of the training dataset is critical to increase the diagnostic accuracy. The performance of the trained machine could be tested by new images before clinical use. Real-time diagnosis, easy to use and potential high accuracy were the advantages of AI for IOPD. In sum, AI with deep learning technology is a promising method to help rapid and accurate IOPD.

Extent of resection and Carmustine wafer implantation safely improve survival in patients with a newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a single center experience of the current practice

For newly diagnosed glioblastomas treated with resection in association with the standard combined chemoradiotherapy, the impact of Carmustine wafer implantation remains debated regarding postoperative infections, quality of life, and feasibility of adjuvant oncological treatments. To assess together safety, tolerance and efficacy of Carmustine wafer implantation and of extent of resection for glioblastoma patients in real-life experience. Observational retrospective monocentric study including 340 consecutive adult patients with a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma who underwent surgical resection with (n = 123) or without (n = 217) Carmustine wafer implantation as first-line oncological treatment. Carmustine wafer implantation and extent of resection did not significantly increase postoperative complications, including postoperative infections (p = 0.269, and p = 0.446, respectively). Carmustine wafer implantation and extent of resection did not significantly increase adverse events during adjuvant oncological therapies (p = 0.968, and p = 0.571, respectively). Carmustine wafer implantation did not significantly alter the early postoperative Karnofsky performance status (p = 0.402) or the Karnofsky performance status after oncological treatment (p = 0.636) but a subtotal or total surgical resection significantly improved those scores (p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Carmustine wafer implantation, subtotal and total resection, and standard combined chemoradiotherapy were independently associated with longer event-free survival (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR), 0.74 [95% CI 0.55-0.99], p = 0.043; aHR, 0.70 [95% CI 0.54-0.91], p = 0.009; aHR, 0.40 [95% CI 0.29-0.55], p < 0.001, respectively) and with longer overall survival (aHR, 0.69 [95% CI 0.49-0.96], p = 0.029; aHR, 0.52 [95% CI 0.38-0.70], p < 0.001; aHR, 0.58 [95% CI 0.42-0.81], p = 0.002, respectively). Carmustine wafer implantation in combination with maximal resection, followed by standard combined chemoradiotherapy is safe, efficient, and well-tolerated in newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastomas in adults.

Importance of biomarkers in glioblastomas patients receiving local BCNU wafer chemotherapy

Background

To assess the influence of molecular markers with potential prognostic value to groups of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients were examined: group A with 36 patients (surgical resection plus standard combined chemoradiotherapy) and group B with 36 patients (surgical resection, standard combined chemoradiotherapy plus carmustine wafer implantation).

Our aim was to determine chromosomal alterations, methylation status of MGMT, p15, and p16 (CDKN2A) in order to analyse the influence on patient survival time as well as radio- and chemotherapy responses. Promoter hypermethylation of MGMT, p16, and p15 genes were determined by MS-PCR. Comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) analyses were performed with isolated, labelled DNA of each tumor to detect genetic alterations.

Results

Age of onset of the disease showed a significant effect on overall survival (OS) (p < 0.0001). Additional treatment with carmustine wafer (group B) compared to the control group (group A) did not result in improved OS (p = 0.562). Patients with a methylated MGMT promotor showed a significant longer OS compared to those patients with unmethylated MGMT promotor (p = 0.041). Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with methylated p15 showed a significant shorter OS when administered to group B rather than in group A (p = 0.0332). In patients additionally treated with carmustine wafer an amplification of 4q12 showed a significant impact on a reduced OS (p = 0.00835). In group B, a loss of 13q was significantly associated with a longer OS (p = 0.0364). If a loss of chromosome 10 occurred, patients in group B showed a significantly longer OS (p = 0.0123).

Conclusion

A clinical benefit for the widespread use of additional carmustine wafer implantation could not be found. However, carmustine wafer implantation shows a significantly improved overall survival if parts of chromosome 10 or chromosome 13 are deleted. In cases of 4q12 amplification and in cases of a methylated p15 promotor, the use of carmustine wafers is especially not recommended.

The MGMT promoter methylation is a strong prognostic Biomarker for benefit from temozolomide and BCNU chemotherapy.

Interactions between glioma and pregnancy: insight from a 52-case multicenter series

OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to provide insight into the influence of gliomas on gestational outcomes, the impact of pregnancy on gliomas, and the identification of patients at risk. METHODS In this multiinstitutional retrospective study, the authors identified 52 pregnancies in 50 women diagnosed with a glioma. RESULTS For gliomas known prior to pregnancy (n = 24), we found the following: 1) An increase in the quantified imaging growth rates occurred during pregnancy in 87% of cases. 2) Clinical deterioration occurred in 38% of cases, with seizures alone resolving after delivery in 57.2% of cases. 3) Oncological treatments were immediately performed after delivery in 25% of cases. For gliomas diagnosed during pregnancy (n = 28), we demonstrated the following: 1) The tumor was discovered during the second and third trimesters in 29% and 54% of cases, respectively, with seizures being the presenting symptom in 68% of cases. 2) The quantified imaging growth rates did not significantly decrease after delivery and before oncological treatment. 3) Clinical deterioration resolved after delivery in 21.4% of cases. 4) Oncological treatments were immediately performed after delivery in 70% of cases. Gliomas with a high grade of malignancy, negative immunoexpression of alpha-internexin, or positive immunoexpression for p53 were more likely to be associated with tumor progression during pregnancy. Deliveries were all uneventful (cesarean section in 54.5% of cases and vaginal delivery in 45.5%), and the infants were developmentally normal. CONCLUSIONS When a woman harboring a glioma envisions a pregnancy, or when a glioma is discovered in a pregnant patient, the authors suggest informing her and her partner that pregnancy may impact the evolution of the glioma clinically and radiologically. They strongly advise a multidisciplinary approach to management. ■ CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE Type of question: association; study design: case series; evidence: Class IV.

Gliadel wafer implantation combined with standard radiotherapy and concurrent followed by adjuvant temozolomide for treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic literature review

Since 2003, only two chemotherapeutic agents, evaluated in phase III trials, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma (HGG): Gliadel wafers (intracranially implanted local chemotherapy) and temozolomide (TMZ) (systemic chemotherapy). Neither agent is curative, but each has been shown to improve median overall survival (OS) compared to radiotherapy (RT) alone. To date, no phase III trial has tested these agents when used in sequential combination; however, a number of smaller trials have reported favorable results. We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate the combination of Gliadel wafers with standard RT (60 Gy) plus concurrent and adjuvant TMZ (RT/TMZ) for newly diagnosed HGG. A literature search was conducted for the period of January 1995 to September 2015. Data were extracted and categorized, and means and ranges were determined. A total of 11 publications met criteria, three prospective trials and eight retrospective studies, representing 411 patients who received Gliadel plus standard RT/TMZ. Patients were similar in age, gender, and performance status. The weighted mean of median OS was 18.2 months (ten trials, n = 379, range 12.7 to 21.3 months), and the weighted mean of median progression-free survival was 9.7 months (seven trials, n = 287, range 7 to 12.9 months). The most commonly reported grade 3 and 4 adverse events were myelosuppression (10.22 %), neurologic deficit (7.8 %), and healing abnormalities (4.3 %). Adverse events reflected the distinct independent safety profiles of Gliadel wafers and RT/TMZ, with little evidence of enhanced toxicity from their use in sequential combination. In the 11 identified trials, an increased benefit from sequentially combining Gliadel wafers with RT/TMZ was strongly suggested. Median OS tended to be improved by 3 to 4 months beyond that observed for Gliadel wafers or TMZ when used alone in the respective phase III trials. Larger prospective trials of Gliadel plus RT/TMZ are warranted.

Reprint of: Signaling the Unfolded Protein Response in primary brain cancers

The Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) is an adaptive cellular program used by eukaryotic cells to cope with protein misfolding stress in the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER). During tumor development, cancer cells are facing intrinsic (oncogene activation) and extrinsic (limiting nutrient or oxygen supply; exposure to chemotherapies) challenges, with which they must cope to survive. Primary brain tumors are relatively rare but deadly and present a significant challenge in the determination of risk factors in the population. These tumors are inherently difficult to cure because of their protected location in the brain. As such surgery, radiation and chemotherapy options carry potentially lasting patient morbidity and incomplete tumor cure. Some of these tumors, such as glioblastoma, were reported to present features of ER stress and to depend on UPR activation to sustain growth, but to date there is no clear general representation of the ER stress status in primary brain tumors. In this review, we describe the key molecular mechanisms controlling the UPR and their implication in cancers. Then we extensively review the literature reporting the status of ER stress in various primary brain tumors and discuss the potential impact of such observation on patient stratification and on the possibility of developing appropriate targeted therapies using the UPR as therapeutic target. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI:ER stress.

Signaling the Unfolded Protein Response in primary brain cancers

The Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) is an adaptive cellular program used by eukaryotic cells to cope with protein misfolding stress in the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER). During tumor development, cancer cells are facing intrinsic (oncogene activation) and extrinsic (limiting nutrient or oxygen supply; exposure to chemotherapies) challenges, with which they must cope to survive. Primary brain tumors are relatively rare but deadly and present a significant challenge in the determination of risk factors in the population. These tumors are inherently difficult to cure because of their protected location in the brain. As such surgery, radiation and chemotherapy options carry potentially lasting patient morbidity and incomplete tumor cure. Some of these tumors, such as glioblastoma, were reported to present features of ER stress and to depend on UPR activation to sustain growth, but to date there is no clear general representation of the ER stress status in primary brain tumors. In this review, we describe the key molecular mechanisms controlling the UPR and their implication in cancers. Then we extensively review the literature reporting the status of ER stress in various primary brain tumors and discuss the potential impact of such observation on patient stratification and on the possibility of developing appropriate targeted therapies using the UPR as therapeutic target.

Delaying standard combined chemoradiotherapy after surgical resection does not impact survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients

BACKGROUND

To assess the influence of the time interval between surgical resection and standard combined chemoradiotherapy on survival in newly diagnosed and homogeneously treated (surgical resection plus standard combined chemoradiotherapy) glioblastoma patients; while controlling confounding factors (extent of resection, carmustine wafer implantation, functional status, neurological deficit, and postoperative complications).

METHODS

From 2005 to 2011, 692 adult patients (434 men; mean of 57.5 ± 10.8 years) with a newly diagnosed glioblastoma were enrolled in this retrospective multicentric study. All patients were treated by surgical resection (65.5% total/subtotal resection, 34.5% partial resection; 36.7% carmustine wafer implantation) followed by standard combined chemoradiotherapy (radiotherapy at a median dose of 60 Gy, with daily concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide). Time interval to standard combined chemoradiotherapy was analyzed as a continuous variable and as a dichotomized variable using median and quartiles thresholds. Multivariate analyses using Cox modeling were conducted.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival was 10.3 months (95% CI, 10.0-11.0). The median overall survival was 19.7 months (95% CI, 18.5-21.0). The median time to initiation of combined chemoradiotherapy was 1.5 months (25% quartile, 1.0; 75% quartile, 2.2; range, 0.1-9.0). On univariate and multivariate analyses, OS and PFS were not significantly influenced by time intervals to adjuvant treatments. On multivariate analysis, female gender, total/subtotal resection and RTOG-RPA classes 3 and 4 were significant independent predictors of improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Delaying standard combined chemoradiotherapy following surgical resection of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adult patients does not impact survival.

Polifeprosan 20, 3.85% carmustine slow release wafer in malignant glioma: patient selection and perspectives on a low-burden therapy

Polifeprosan 20 with carmustine (GLIADEL^®) polymer implant wafer is a biodegradable compound containing 3.85% carmustine (BCNU, bischloroethylnitrosourea) implanted in the brain at the time of planned tumor surgery, which then slowly degrades to release the BCNU chemotherapy directly into the brain thereby bypassing the blood-brain barrier. Carmustine implant wafers were demonstrated to improve survival in randomized placebo-controlled trials in patients undergoing a near total resection of newly diagnosed or recurrent malignant glioma. Based on these trials and other supporting data, carmustine wafer therapy was approved for use for newly diagnosed and recurrent malignant glioma in the United States and the European Union. Adverse events are uncommon, and as this therapy is placed at the time of surgery, it does not add to patient treatment burden. Nevertheless, this therapy appears to be underutilized. This article reviews the evidence for a favorable therapeutic ratio for the patient and the potential barriers. Consideration of these issues is important for optimal use of this therapeutic approach and may be important as this technology and other local therapies are further developed in the future.