1
|
Flies CM, Friedrich M, Lohmann P, van Garderen KA, Smits M, Tonn JC, Weller M, Galldiks N, Snijders TJ. Treatment-associated imaging changes in newly diagnosed MGMT promoter-methylated glioblastoma undergoing chemoradiation with or without cilengitide. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:902-910. [PMID: 38219019 PMCID: PMC11066942 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiological progression may originate from progressive disease (PD) or pseudoprogression/treatment-associated changes. We assessed radiological progression in O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter-methylated glioblastoma treated with standard-of-care chemoradiotherapy with or without the integrin inhibitor cilengitide according to the modified response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria of 2017. METHODS Patients with ≥ 3 follow-up MRIs were included. Preliminary PD was defined as a ≥ 25% increase of the sum of products of perpendicular diameters (SPD) of a new or increasing lesion compared to baseline. PD required a second ≥25% increase of the SPD. Treatment-associated changes require stable or regressing disease after preliminary PD. RESULTS Of the 424 evaluable patients, 221 patients (52%) were randomized into the cilengitide and 203 patients (48%) into the control arm. After chemoradiation with or without cilengitide, preliminary PD occurred in 274 patients (65%) during available follow-up, and 88 of these patients (32%) had treatment-associated changes, whereas 67 patients (25%) had PD. The remaining 119 patients (43%) had no further follow-up after preliminary PD. Treatment-associated changes were more common in the cilengitide arm than in the standard-of-care arm (24% vs. 17%; relative risk, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.004-1.795; P = .047). Treatment-associated changes occurred mainly during the first 6 months after RT (54% after 3 months vs. 13% after 6 months). CONCLUSIONS With the modified RANO criteria, the rate of treatment-associated changes was low compared to previous studies in MGMT promoter-methylated glioblastoma. This rate was higher after cilengitide compared to standard-of-care treatment. Confirmatory scans, as recommended in the modified RANO criteria, were not always available reflecting current clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Maria Flies
- Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michel Friedrich
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Karin Alida van Garderen
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Tumour Centre, Erasmus MC Cancer Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Delta, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Tumour Centre, Erasmus MC Cancer Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Delta, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Tom Jan Snijders
- Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Park JE, Kim HS, Kim N, Borra R, Mouridsen K, Hansen MB, Kim YH, Hong CK, Kim JH. Prediction of pseudoprogression in post-treatment glioblastoma using dynamic susceptibility contrast-derived oxygenation and microvascular transit time heterogeneity measures. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:3061-3073. [PMID: 37848773 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10324-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the added value of MR dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI)-derived tumour microvascular and oxygenation information with cerebral blood volume (CBV) to distinguish pseudoprogression from true progression (TP) in post-treatment glioblastoma. METHODS This retrospective single-institution study included patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type glioblastoma and a newly developed or enlarging measurable contrast-enhancing mass within 12 weeks after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. CBV, capillary transit time heterogeneity (CTH), oxygen extraction fraction (OEF), and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) were obtained from DSC-PWI. Predictors were selected using univariable logistic regression, and performance was measured with adjusted diagnostic odds with tumour volume and area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics analysis. RESULTS A total of 103 patients were included (mean age, 59.6 years; 59 women), with 67 cases of TP and 36 cases of pseudoprogression. Pseudoprogression exhibited higher CTH (4.0 vs. 3.4, p = .019) and higher OEF (12.7 vs. 10.7, p = .014) than TP, but a similar CBV (1.48 vs. 1.53, p = .13) and CMRO2 (7.7 vs. 7.3s, p = .598). Independent of tumour volume, both high CTH (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-2.09, p = .009) and high OEF (adjusted OR 1.17; 95% CI:1.03-1.33, p = .016) were predictors of pseudoprogression. The combination of CTH, OEF, and CBV yielded higher diagnostic performance (AUC 0.71) than CBV alone (AUC 0.65). CONCLUSION High intratumoural capillary transit heterogeneity and high oxygen extraction fraction derived from DSC-PWI have enhanced the diagnostic value of CBV in pseudoprogression of post-treatment IDH-wild type glioblastoma. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT In the early post-treatment stage of glioblastoma, pseudoprogression exhibited both high oxygen extraction fraction and high capillary transit heterogeneity and these dynamic susceptibility contrast-perfusion weighted imaging derived parameters have added value in cerebral blood volume-based noninvasive differentiation of pseudoprogression from true progression. KEY POINTS • Capillary transit time heterogeneity and oxygen extraction fraction can be measured noninvasively through processing of dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. • Pseudoprogression exhibited higher capillary transit time heterogeneity and higher oxygen extraction fraction than true progression. • A combination of cerebral blood volume, capillary transit time heterogeneity, and oxygen extraction fraction yielded the highest diagnostic performance (area under the curve 0.71).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Eun Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Ho Sung Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 43 Olympic-ro 88, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
| | | | - Ronald Borra
- Cercare Medical, Inge Lehmanns Gade 10, 8000 Aarhus C, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kim Mouridsen
- Cercare Medical, Inge Lehmanns Gade 10, 8000 Aarhus C, Aarhus, Denmark
- Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience and MINDLab, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mikkel Bo Hansen
- Cercare Medical, Inge Lehmanns Gade 10, 8000 Aarhus C, Aarhus, Denmark
- Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience and MINDLab, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang-Ki Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Hoon Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lim-Fat MJ, Iorgulescu JB, Rahman R, Bhave V, Muzikansky A, Woodward E, Whorral S, Allen M, Touat M, Li X, Xy G, Patel J, Gerstner ER, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Youssef G, Chukwueke U, McFaline-Figueroa JR, Nayak L, Lee EQ, Reardon DA, Beroukhim R, Huang RY, Bi WL, Ligon KL, Wen PY. Clinical and Genomic Predictors of Adverse Events in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:1327-1337. [PMID: 38252427 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-3018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adverse clinical events cause significant morbidity in patients with GBM (GBM). We examined whether genomic alterations were associated with AE (AE) in patients with GBM. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We identified adults with histologically confirmed IDH-wild-type GBM with targeted next-generation sequencing (OncoPanel) at Dana Farber Cancer Institute from 2013 to 2019. Seizure at presentation, lymphopenia, thromboembolic events, pseudoprogression, and early progression (within 6 months of diagnosis) were identified as AE. The biologic function of genetic variants was categorized as loss-of-function (LoF), no change in function, or gain-of-function (GoF) using a somatic tumor mutation knowledge base (OncoKB) and consensus protein function predictions. Associations between functional genomic alterations and AE were examined using univariate logistic regressions and multivariable regressions adjusted for additional clinical predictors. RESULTS Our study included 470 patients diagnosed with GBM who met the study criteria. We focused on 105 genes that had sequencing data available for ≥ 90% of the patients and were altered in ≥10% of the cohort. Following false-discovery rate (FDR) correction and multivariable adjustment, the TP53, RB1, IGF1R, and DIS3 LoF alterations were associated with lower odds of seizures, while EGFR, SMARCA4, GNA11, BRD4, and TCF3 GoF and SETD2 LoF alterations were associated with higher odds of seizures. For all other AE of interest, no significant associations were found with genomic alterations following FDR correction. CONCLUSIONS Genomic biomarkers based on functional variant analysis of a routine clinical panel may help identify AE in GBM, particularly seizures. Identifying these risk factors could improve the management of patients through better supportive care and consideration of prophylactic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Jane Lim-Fat
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Bryan Iorgulescu
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Department of Hematopathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rifaquat Rahman
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Varun Bhave
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alona Muzikansky
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eleanor Woodward
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sydney Whorral
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marie Allen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mehdi Touat
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Jay Patel
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth R Gerstner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gilbert Youssef
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ugonma Chukwueke
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - J Ricardo McFaline-Figueroa
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lakshmi Nayak
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eudocia Q Lee
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David A Reardon
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rameen Beroukhim
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Keith L Ligon
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Obrador E, Moreno-Murciano P, Oriol-Caballo M, López-Blanch R, Pineda B, Gutiérrez-Arroyo JL, Loras A, Gonzalez-Bonet LG, Martinez-Cadenas C, Estrela JM, Marqués-Torrejón MÁ. Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:2529. [PMID: 38473776 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25052529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GB) stands out as the most prevalent and lethal form of brain cancer. Although great efforts have been made by clinicians and researchers, no significant improvement in survival has been achieved since the Stupp protocol became the standard of care (SOC) in 2005. Despite multimodality treatments, recurrence is almost universal with survival rates under 2 years after diagnosis. Here, we discuss the recent progress in our understanding of GB pathophysiology, in particular, the importance of glioma stem cells (GSCs), the tumor microenvironment conditions, and epigenetic mechanisms involved in GB growth, aggressiveness and recurrence. The discussion on therapeutic strategies first covers the SOC treatment and targeted therapies that have been shown to interfere with different signaling pathways (pRB/CDK4/RB1/P16ink4, TP53/MDM2/P14arf, PI3k/Akt-PTEN, RAS/RAF/MEK, PARP) involved in GB tumorigenesis, pathophysiology, and treatment resistance acquisition. Below, we analyze several immunotherapeutic approaches (i.e., checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, CAR-modified NK or T cells, oncolytic virotherapy) that have been used in an attempt to enhance the immune response against GB, and thereby avoid recidivism or increase survival of GB patients. Finally, we present treatment attempts made using nanotherapies (nanometric structures having active anti-GB agents such as antibodies, chemotherapeutic/anti-angiogenic drugs or sensitizers, radionuclides, and molecules that target GB cellular receptors or open the blood-brain barrier) and non-ionizing energies (laser interstitial thermal therapy, high/low intensity focused ultrasounds, photodynamic/sonodynamic therapies and electroporation). The aim of this review is to discuss the advances and limitations of the current therapies and to present novel approaches that are under development or following clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Obrador
- Scientia BioTech S.L., 46002 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | | | - María Oriol-Caballo
- Scientia BioTech S.L., 46002 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Rafael López-Blanch
- Scientia BioTech S.L., 46002 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Begoña Pineda
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Alba Loras
- Department of Medicine, Jaume I University of Castellon, 12071 Castellon, Spain
| | - Luis G Gonzalez-Bonet
- Department of Neurosurgery, Castellon General University Hospital, 12004 Castellon, Spain
| | | | - José M Estrela
- Scientia BioTech S.L., 46002 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Valencia, 46100 Burjassot, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wen PY, van den Bent M, Youssef G, Cloughesy TF, Ellingson BM, Weller M, Galanis E, Barboriak DP, de Groot J, Gilbert MR, Huang R, Lassman AB, Mehta M, Molinaro AM, Preusser M, Rahman R, Shankar LK, Stupp R, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Wick W, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Vogelbaum MA, Chang SM. RANO 2.0: Update to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria for High- and Low-Grade Gliomas in Adults. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:5187-5199. [PMID: 37774317 PMCID: PMC10860967 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for high-grade gliomas (RANO-HGG) and low-grade gliomas (RANO-LGG) were developed to improve reliability of response assessment in glioma trials. Over time, some limitations of these criteria were identified, and challenges emerged regarding integrating features of the modified RANO (mRANO) or the immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. METHODS Informed by data from studies evaluating the different criteria, updates to the RANO criteria are proposed (RANO 2.0). RESULTS We recommend a standard set of criteria for both high- and low-grade gliomas, to be used for all trials regardless of the treatment modalities being evaluated. In the newly diagnosed setting, the postradiotherapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), rather than the postsurgical MRI, will be used as the baseline for comparison with subsequent scans. Since the incidence of pseudoprogression is high in the 12 weeks after radiotherapy, continuation of treatment and confirmation of progression during this period with a repeat MRI, or histopathologic evidence of unequivocal recurrent tumor, are required to define tumor progression. However, confirmation scans are not mandatory after this period nor for the evaluation of treatment for recurrent tumors. For treatments with a high likelihood of pseudoprogression, mandatory confirmation of progression with a repeat MRI is highly recommended. The primary measurement remains the maximum cross-sectional area of tumor (two-dimensional) but volumetric measurements are an option. For IDH wild-type glioblastoma, the nonenhancing disease will no longer be evaluated except when assessing response to antiangiogenic agents. In IDH-mutated tumors with a significant nonenhancing component, clinical trials may require evaluating both the enhancing and nonenhancing tumor components for response assessment. CONCLUSION The revised RANO 2.0 criteria refine response assessment in gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Y. Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Department Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gilbert Youssef
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Timothy F. Cloughesy
- UCLA Brain Tumor Program, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Benjamin M. Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - John de Groot
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Mark R. Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Raymond Huang
- Division of Neuro-radiology, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew B. Lassman
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center and Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | - Annette M. Molinaro
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rifaquat Rahman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lalitha K. Shankar
- Clinical Trials Branch, Cancer Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Roger Stupp
- Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Neurological Surgery, Neurology and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Wolfgang Wick
- Department of Neurology Heidelberg University Hospital & Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David R. Macdonald
- Departments of Clinical Neurological Sciences and Oncology (Emeritus), Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - David A. Reardon
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Michael A. Vogelbaum
- Departments of Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgery, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Susan M. Chang
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Young JS, Al-Adli N, Scotford K, Cha S, Berger MS. Pseudoprogression versus true progression in glioblastoma: what neurosurgeons need to know. J Neurosurg 2023; 139:748-759. [PMID: 36790010 PMCID: PMC10412732 DOI: 10.3171/2022.12.jns222173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Management of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is complex and involves implementing standard therapies including resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, as well as novel immunotherapies and targeted small-molecule inhibitors through clinical trials and precision medicine approaches. As treatments have advanced, the radiological and clinical assessment of patients with GBM has become even more challenging and nuanced. Advances in spatial resolution and both anatomical and physiological information that can be derived from MRI have greatly improved the noninvasive assessment of GBM before, during, and after therapy. Identification of pseudoprogression (PsP), defined as changes concerning for tumor progression that are, in fact, transient and related to treatment response, is critical for successful patient management. These temporary changes can produce new clinical symptoms due to mass effect and edema. Differentiating this entity from true tumor progression is a major decision point in the patient's management and prognosis. Providers may choose to start an alternative therapy, transition to a clinical trial, consider repeat resection, or continue with the current therapy in hopes of resolution. In this review, the authors describe the invasive and noninvasive techniques neurosurgeons need to be aware of to identify PsP and facilitate surgical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob S. Young
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Nadeem Al-Adli
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- School of Medicine, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - Katie Scotford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Soonmee Cha
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Mitchel S. Berger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Weller M, Le Rhun E, Van den Bent M, Chang SM, Cloughesy TF, Goldbrunner R, Hong YK, Jalali R, Jenkinson MD, Minniti G, Nagane M, Razis E, Roth P, Rudà R, Tabatabai G, Wen PY, Short SC, Preusser M. Diagnosis and management of complications from the treatment of primary central nervous system tumors in adults. Neuro Oncol 2023; 25:1200-1224. [PMID: 36843451 PMCID: PMC10326495 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) tumor patients commonly undergo multimodality treatment in the course of their disease. Adverse effects and complications from these interventions have not been systematically studied, but pose significant challenges in clinical practice and impact function and quality of life, especially in the management of long-term brain tumor survivors. Here, the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) has developed recommendations to prevent, diagnose, and manage adverse effects and complications in the adult primary brain CNS tumor (except lymphomas) patient population with a specific focus on surgery, radiotherapy, and pharmacotherapy. Specifically, we also provide recommendations for dose adaptations, interruptions, and reexposure for pharmacotherapy that may serve as a reference for the management of standard of care in clinical trials. We also summarize which interventions are unnecessary, inactive or contraindicated. This consensus paper should serve as a reference for the conduct of standard therapy within and outside of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin Van den Bent
- The Brain Tumour Center at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Roland Goldbrunner
- Center of Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Yong-Kil Hong
- Brain Tumor Center, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, South Korea
| | - Rakesh Jalali
- Neuro Oncology Cancer Management Team, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Michael D Jenkinson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust & University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Siena, Italy
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy
| | - Motoo Nagane
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Evangelia Razis
- Third Department of Medical Oncology, Hygeia Hospital, Marousi, Athens, Greece
| | - Patrick Roth
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, City of Health and Science and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Department of Neurology & Neuro-Oncology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Center for Neurooncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Tübingen, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susan C Short
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sidibe I, Tensaouti F, Gilhodes J, Cabarrou B, Filleron T, Desmoulin F, Ken S, Noël G, Truc G, Sunyach MP, Charissoux M, Magné N, Lotterie JA, Roques M, Péran P, Cohen-Jonathan Moyal E, Laprie A. Pseudoprogression in GBM versus true progression in patients with glioblastoma: A multiapproach analysis. Radiother Oncol 2023; 181:109486. [PMID: 36706959 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility of using a multiapproach analysis combining clinical data, diffusion- and perfusion-weighted imaging, and 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging to distinguish true tumor progression (TP) from pseudoprogression (PSP) in patients with glioblastoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Progression was suspected within 6 months of radiotherapy in 46 of the 180 patients included in the Phase-III SpectroGlio trial (NCT01507506). Choline/creatine (Cho/Cr), choline/N-acetyl aspartate (Cho/NAA) and lactate/N-acetyl aspartate (Lac/NAA) ratios were extracted. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) maps were calculated. ADC, relative CBV values and tumor volume (TV) were collected at relapse. Differences between TP and PSP were evaluated using Mann-Whitney tests, and p values were adjusted with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS Patients with suspected progression underwent a new MRI scan 1 month after the first one. Of these, 28 were classified as PSP, and 18 as TP. After a median follow-up of 41 months, median overall survival was higher in PSP than in TP (25.2 vs 20.3 months; p = 0.0092). Lac/NAA and Cho/Cr ratios were higher in TP than in PSP (1.2 vs 0.5; p = 0.006; and 3 vs 2.2; p = 0.021). After multivariate regression analysis, TV was the most significant predictor of TP vs PSP, and the only one retained in the model (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION Three spectroscopic ratios could be used to differentiate PSP from TP. TV at relapse was the most predictive factor in the multivariate analysis, and overall survival was higher in PSP than in TP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Sidibe
- Radiation Oncology Department, Claudius Regaud Institute/Toulouse University Cancer Institute - Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier & INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Fatima Tensaouti
- Radiation Oncology Department, Claudius Regaud Institute/Toulouse University Cancer Institute - Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier & INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Julia Gilhodes
- Biostatistics Department, Claudius Regaud Institute/Toulouse University Cancer Institute - Oncopôle, Toulouse, France
| | - Bastien Cabarrou
- Biostatistics Department, Claudius Regaud Institute/Toulouse University Cancer Institute - Oncopôle, Toulouse, France
| | - Thomas Filleron
- Biostatistics Department, Claudius Regaud Institute/Toulouse University Cancer Institute - Oncopôle, Toulouse, France
| | - Franck Desmoulin
- Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier & INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Soleakhena Ken
- Radiation Oncology Department, Claudius Regaud Institute/Toulouse University Cancer Institute - Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; Radiation Oncology Department, Toulouse Center for Cancer Research & INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Georges Noël
- Radiation Oncology Department, ICANS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Gilles Truc
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges-François Leclerc Center, Dijon, France
| | | | | | - Nicolas Magné
- Radiation Oncology Department, Lucien Neuwirth Loire Cancer Institute, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Jean-Albert Lotterie
- Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier & INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Margaux Roques
- Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier & INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Patrice Péran
- Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier & INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal
- Radiation Oncology Department, Claudius Regaud Institute/Toulouse University Cancer Institute - Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; Radiation Oncology Department, Toulouse Center for Cancer Research & INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- Radiation Oncology Department, Claudius Regaud Institute/Toulouse University Cancer Institute - Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier & INSERM, Toulouse, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Eichkorn T, Lischalk JW, Sandrini E, Meixner E, Regnery S, Held T, Bauer J, Bahn E, Harrabi S, Hörner-Rieber J, Herfarth K, Debus J, König L. Iatrogenic Influence on Prognosis of Radiation-Induced Contrast Enhancements in Patients with Glioma WHO 1-3 following Photon and Proton Radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:133-143. [PMID: 36041565 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Radiation-induced contrast enhancement (RICE) is a common side effect following radiotherapy for glioma, but both diagnosis and handling are challenging. Due to the potential risks associated with RICE and its challenges in differentiating RICE from tumor progression, it is critical to better understand how RICE prognosis depends on iatrogenic influence. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified 99 patients diagnosed with RICE who were previously treated with either photon or proton therapy for World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1-3 primary gliomas. Post-treatment brain MRI-based volumetric analysis and clinical data collection was performed at multiple time points. RESULTS The most common histologic subtypes were astrocytoma (50%) and oligodendroglioma (46%). In 67%, it was graded WHO grade 2 and in 86% an IDH mutation was present. RICE first occurred after 16 months (range: 1 - 160) in median. At initial RICE occurrence, 39% were misinterpreted as tumor progression. A tumor-specific therapy including chemotherapy or re-irradiation led to a RICE size progression in 86% and 92% of cases, respectively and RICE symptom progression in 57% and 65% of cases, respectively. A RICE-specific therapy such as corticosteroids or Bevacizumab for larger or symptomatic RICE led to a RICE size regression in 81% of cases with symptom stability or regression in 62% of cases. CONCLUSIONS While with chemotherapy and re-irradiation a RICE progression was frequently observed, anti-edematous or anti-VEGF treatment frequently went along with a RICE regression. For RICE, correct diagnosis and treatment decisions are challenging and critical and should be made interdisciplinarily.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jonathan W Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Health at Long Island, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Elisabetta Sandrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Julia Bauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Emanuel Bahn
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yuan J, Liu J, Fan R, Liu Z. HECTD3 enhances cell radiation resistance and migration by regulating LKB1 mediated ZEB1 in glioma. Eur J Neurosci 2022; 56:4275-4286. [PMID: 35768187 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Homologous to the E6-associated protein carboxyl terminus domain containing 3 (HECTD3) has been reported to play a role in carcinogenesis. Here, we explored the role of HECTD3 in regulating the radiation resistance of glioma, and the underlying mechanism. HECTD3 expressions in glioma tissues were assessed using Western blotting, qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. Glioma cells were exposed to 2, 4, 6 or 8Gy X-ray to mimic the radiation treatment. CCK-8, clone formation assay, flow cytometry assay, transwell chambers and animal assay were used to test cell viability, apoptosis, migration, invasiveness and tumorigenesis, respectively. HECTD3 expression was increased in glioma tissues, especially from patients with radiation resistance. Knockdown of HECTD3 promoted cell apoptosis and inhibited cell viability under the condition of 8Gy X-ray, as well as suppressed cell migration and invasiveness. In mechanism, HECTD3 positively regulated ZEB1 expression through regulating the ubiquitination of LKB1 protein. Overexpression of ZEB2 significantly abolished the effects of HECTD3 downregulation in inhibiting the radiation resistance and migration of glioma cells. Moreover, downregulation of HECTD3 further enhanced the anti-tumor effect of X-ray on glioma growth in vivo. In conclusion, HECTD3 was overexpressed in glioma patients with radiation resistance. Knockdown of HECTD3 sensitized glioma cells to radiation and inhibited cell migration by downregulating ZEB1 expression via regulating the ubiquitination of LKB1 protein. This study reveals that HECTD3 might be a potent target to enhance the radiation sensitivity of glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinjin Yuan
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Junqi Liu
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Ruitai Fan
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Zongwen Liu
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
MRI Response Assessment in Glioblastoma Patients Treated with Dendritic-Cell-Based Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061579. [PMID: 35326730 PMCID: PMC8946797 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: In this post hoc analysis we compared various response-assessment criteria in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GB) patients treated with tumor lysate-charged autologous dendritic cells (Audencel) and determined the differences in prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: 76 patients enrolled in a multicenter phase II trial receiving standard of care (SOC, n = 40) or SOC + Audencel vaccine (n = 36) were included. MRI scans were evaluated using MacDonald, RANO, Vol-RANO, mRANO, Vol-mRANO and iRANO criteria. Tumor volumes (T1 contrast-enhancing as well as T2/FLAIR volumes) were calculated by semiautomatic segmentation. The Kruskal-Wallis-test was used to detect differences in PFS among the assessment criteria; for correlation analysis the Spearman test was used. Results: There was a significant difference in median PFS between mRANO (8.6 months) and Vol-mRANO (8.6 months) compared to MacDonald (4.0 months), RANO (4.2 months) and Vol-RANO (5.4 months). For the vaccination arm, median PFS by iRANO was 6.2 months. There was no difference in PFS between SOC and SOC + Audencel. The best correlation between PFS/OS was detected for mRANO (r = 0.65) and Vol-mRANO (r = 0.69, each p < 0.001). A total of 16/76 patients developed a pure T2/FLAIR progressing disease, and 4/36 patients treated with Audencel developed pseudoprogression. Conclusion: When comparing different response-assessment criteria in GB patients treated with dendritic cell-based immunotherapy, the best correlation between PFS and OS was observed for mRANO and Vol-mRANO. Interestingly, iRANO was not superior for predicting OS in patients treated with Audencel.
Collapse
|
12
|
Carrete LR, Young JS, Cha S. Advanced Imaging Techniques for Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Gliomas. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:787755. [PMID: 35281485 PMCID: PMC8904563 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.787755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Management of gliomas following initial diagnosis requires thoughtful presurgical planning followed by regular imaging to monitor treatment response and survey for new tumor growth. Traditional MR imaging modalities such as T1 post-contrast and T2-weighted sequences have long been a staple of tumor diagnosis, surgical planning, and post-treatment surveillance. While these sequences remain integral in the management of gliomas, advances in imaging techniques have allowed for a more detailed characterization of tumor characteristics. Advanced MR sequences such as perfusion, diffusion, and susceptibility weighted imaging, as well as PET scans have emerged as valuable tools to inform clinical decision making and provide a non-invasive way to help distinguish between tumor recurrence and pseudoprogression. Furthermore, these advances in imaging have extended to the operating room and assist in making surgical resections safer. Nevertheless, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation treatment continue to make the interpretation of MR changes difficult for glioma patients. As analytics and machine learning techniques improve, radiomics offers the potential to be more quantitative and personalized in the interpretation of imaging data for gliomas. In this review, we describe the role of these newer imaging modalities during the different stages of management for patients with gliomas, focusing on the pre-operative, post-operative, and surveillance periods. Finally, we discuss radiomics as a means of promoting personalized patient care in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis R. Carrete
- University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Jacob S. Young
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Jacob S. Young,
| | - Soonmee Cha
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sidibe I, Tensaouti F, Roques M, Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal E, Laprie A. Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma: Role of Metabolic and Functional MRI-Systematic Review. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10020285. [PMID: 35203493 PMCID: PMC8869397 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10020285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Glioblastoma is the most frequent malignant primitive brain tumor in adults. The treatment includes surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. During follow-up, combined chemoradiotherapy can induce treatment-related changes mimicking tumor progression on medical imaging, such as pseudoprogression (PsP). Differentiating PsP from true progression (TP) remains a challenge for radiologists and oncologists, who need to promptly start a second-line treatment in the case of TP. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion MRI, and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging are more efficient than conventional MRI in differentiating PsP from TP. None of these techniques are fully effective, but current advances in computer science and the advent of artificial intelligence are opening up new possibilities in the imaging field with radiomics (i.e., extraction of a large number of quantitative MRI features describing tumor density, texture, and geometry). These features are used to build predictive models for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic response. Method: Out of 7350 records for MR spectroscopy, GBM, glioma, recurrence, diffusion, perfusion, pseudoprogression, radiomics, and advanced imaging, we screened 574 papers. A total of 228 were eligible, and we analyzed 72 of them, in order to establish the role of each imaging modality and the usefulness and limitations of radiomics analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Sidibe
- Radiation Oncology Department, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Institute Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France; (I.S.); (F.T.); (E.C.-J.-M.)
- Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier INSERM, 31100 Toulouse, France;
| | - Fatima Tensaouti
- Radiation Oncology Department, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Institute Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France; (I.S.); (F.T.); (E.C.-J.-M.)
- Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier INSERM, 31100 Toulouse, France;
| | - Margaux Roques
- Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier INSERM, 31100 Toulouse, France;
- Radiology Department, Purpan University Hospital, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal
- Radiation Oncology Department, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Institute Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France; (I.S.); (F.T.); (E.C.-J.-M.)
- INSERM UMR.1037-Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT)/University Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- Radiation Oncology Department, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Institute Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France; (I.S.); (F.T.); (E.C.-J.-M.)
- Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier INSERM, 31100 Toulouse, France;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cook TA, Jayamanne DT, Wheeler HR, Wong MHF, Parkinson JF, Cook RJ, Kastelan MA, Cove NJ, Brown C, Back MF. Redo craniotomy or bevacizumab for symptomatic steroid-refractory true or pseudoprogression following IMRT for glioblastoma. Neurooncol Pract 2021; 8:601-608. [PMID: 34594572 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npab034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is minimal evidence to support decision making for symptomatic steroid-refractory pseudoprogression or true progression occurring after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for glioblastoma (GBM). This study audited the survival outcome of patients managed with redo craniotomy (RedoSx) or bevacizumab (BEV) for steroid-refractory mass effect after IMRT for GBM. Methods Patients with GBM managed between 2008 and 2019 with the EORTC-NCIC Protocol were entered into a prospective database. Patients with symptomatic steroid-refractory mass effect within 6 months of IMRT managed with either RedoSx or BEV were identified for analysis. For the primary endpoint of median overall survival (OS) postintervention, outcome was analyzed in regards to potential prognostic factors, and differences between groups were assessed by log-rank analyses. Results Of the 399 patients managed with the EORTC-NCIC Protocol, 78 required an intervention within 6 months of IMRT completion for either true or pseudoprogression (49 with RedoSx and 29 with BEV). Subsequently, 20 of the 43 patients managed with RedoSx when BEV was clinically available, required salvage with BEV within 6 months after RedoSx. Median OS postintervention was 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.84-11.61) for the total group; and 8.7 months (95% CI: 6.8-13.1) for RedoSx and 9.4 months (95% CI: 7.8-13.6) for BEV (P = .38). Subsequent use of BEV in RedoSx patients was not associated with improved survival compared with RedoSx alone (P = .10). Age, time from IMRT, and ECOG performance status were not associated with OS. In the RedoSx patients, immunohistochemical features such as Ki-67% reduction correlated with survival. The presence of pure necrosis and residual tumor cells only had improved survival compared with the presence of gross tumor (P < .001). Conclusions At time of symptomatic steroid-refractory true or pseudoprogression following IMRT for GBM, BEV was equivalent to RedoSx in terms of OS. Pseudoprogression with residual cells at RedoSx was not associated with worse outcome compared to pure necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa A Cook
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dasantha T Jayamanne
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Helen R Wheeler
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matthew H F Wong
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathon F Parkinson
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The Brain Cancer Group, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Neurosurgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Raymond J Cook
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marina A Kastelan
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The Brain Cancer Group, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicola J Cove
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christopher Brown
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael F Back
- Central Coast Cancer Centre, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia.,Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Genesis Cancer Care, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The Brain Cancer Group, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang ZH, Xiao XL, Zhang ZT, He K, Hu F. A Radiomics Model for Predicting Early Recurrence in Grade II Gliomas Based on Preoperative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Front Oncol 2021; 11:684996. [PMID: 34540662 PMCID: PMC8443788 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.684996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to develop a radiomics model to predict early recurrence (<1 year) in grade II glioma after the first resection. Methods The pathological, clinical, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of patients diagnosed with grade II glioma who underwent surgery and had a recurrence between 2017 and 2020 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. After a rigorous selection, 64 patients were eligible and enrolled in the study. Twenty-two cases had a pathologically confirmed recurrent glioma. The cases were randomly assigned using a ratio of 7:3 to either the training set or validation set. T1-weighted image (T1WI), T2-weighted image (T2WI), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image (T1CE) were acquired. The minimum-redundancy-maximum-relevancy (mRMR) method alone or in combination with univariate logistic analysis were used to identify the most optimal predictive feature from the three image sequences. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was then used to develop a predictive model using the screened features. The performance of each model in both training and validation datasets was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results A total of 396 radiomics features were initially extracted from each image sequence. After running the mRMR and univariate logistic analysis, nine predictive features were identified and used to build the multiparametric radiomics model. The model had a higher AUC when compared with the univariate models in both training and validation data sets with an AUC of 0.966 (95% confidence interval: 0.949–0.99) and 0.930 (95% confidence interval: 0.905–0.973), respectively. The calibration curves indicated a good agreement between the predictable and the actual probability of developing recurrence. The DCA demonstrated that the predictive value of the model improved when combining the three MRI sequences. Conclusion Our multiparametric radiomics model could be used as an efficient and accurate tool for predicting the recurrence of grade II glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen-Hua Wang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Xin-Lan Xiao
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Zhao-Tao Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Keng He
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Feng Hu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Machine-Learning-Based Radiomics MRI Model for Survival Prediction of Recurrent Glioblastomas Treated with Bevacizumab. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11071263. [PMID: 34359346 PMCID: PMC8305059 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Anti-angiogenic therapy with bevacizumab is a widely used therapeutic option for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Nevertheless, the therapeutic response remains highly heterogeneous among GBM patients with discordant outcomes. Recent data have shown that radiomics, an advanced recent imaging analysis method, can help to predict both prognosis and therapy in a multitude of solid tumours. The objective of this study was to identify novel biomarkers, extracted from MRI and clinical data, which could predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in GBM patients treated with bevacizumab using machine-learning algorithms. In a cohort of 194 recurrent GBM patients (age range 18-80), radiomics data from pre-treatment T2 FLAIR and gadolinium-injected MRI images along with clinical features were analysed. Binary classification models for OS at 9, 12, and 15 months were evaluated. Our classification models successfully stratified the OS. The AUCs were equal to 0.78, 0.85, and 0.76 on the test sets (0.79, 0.82, and 0.87 on the training sets) for the 9-, 12-, and 15-month endpoints, respectively. Regressions yielded a C-index of 0.64 (0.74) for OS and 0.57 (0.69) for PFS. These results suggest that radiomics could assist in the elaboration of a predictive model for treatment selection in recurrent GBM patients.
Collapse
|
17
|
Haider AS, van den Bent M, Wen PY, Vogelbaum MA, Chang S, Canoll PD, Horbinski CM, Huse JT. Toward a standard pathological and molecular characterization of recurrent glioma in adults: a Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology effort. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:450-456. [PMID: 31844891 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Regardless of subtype, diffuse gliomas of adulthood are characterized by inexorable progression through treatment. Cancer recurrence in the context of therapy is by no means unique to gliomas. For many tumors residing outside the central nervous system (CNS), tissue-based analyses are routinely employed to document the molecular and cellular features of disease recurrence. Such interventions are inconsistently applied for gliomas, however, and lack rigorous standardization when they are. While many of the reasons underlying these discrepancies reflect pragmatic realities inherent to CNS disease, the suboptimal employment of histological and molecular assessment at recurrence nevertheless represents a missed opportunity to proactively guide patient management and increase knowledge. Herein, we address this quandary by pairing a succinct description of the histological, biological, and molecular characteristics of recurrent glioma with recommendations for how to better standardize and implement quality pathological assessment into patient management. We hope this review will prompt thoughtful revision of standard operating procedures to maximize the utility of glioma re-biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali S Haider
- Departments of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Susan Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Peter D Canoll
- Departments of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Craig M Horbinski
- Departments of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jason T Huse
- Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Voss M, Wenger KJ, Fokas E, Forster MT, Steinbach JP, Ronellenfitsch MW. Single-shot bevacizumab for cerebral radiation injury. BMC Neurol 2021; 21:77. [PMID: 33596839 PMCID: PMC7888179 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-021-02103-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cerebral radiation injury, including subacute radiation reactions and later stage radiation necrosis, is a severe side effect of brain tumor radiotherapy. A protocol of four infusions of the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab has been shown to be a highly effective treatment. However, bevacizumab is costly and can cause severe complications including thrombosis, bleeding and gastrointestinal perforations. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated in our clinic for cerebral radiation injury who received only a singular treatment with bevacizumab. Single-shot was defined as a singular administration of bevacizumab without a second administration during an interval of at least 6 weeks. Results We identified 11 patients who had received a singular administration of bevacizumab to treat cerebral radiation injury. Prior radiation had been administered to treat gliomas (ten patients) or breast cancer brain metastases (one patient). 9 of 10 patients with available MRIs showed a marked reduction of edema at first follow-up. Discontinuation of Dexamethasone was possible in 6 patients and a significant dose reduction could be achieved in all other patients. One patient developed pulmonary artery embolism 2 months after bevacizumab administration. The median time to treatment failure of any cause was 3 months. Conclusions Single-shot bevacizumab therefore has meaningful activity in cerebral radiation injury, but durable control is rarely achieved. In patients where a complete protocol of four infusions with bevacizumab is not feasible due to medical contraindications or lack of reimbursement, single-shot bevacizumab treatment may be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Voss
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. .,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. .,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Georg-Speyer-Haus, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
| | - Katharina J Wenger
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Georg-Speyer-Haus, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Georg-Speyer-Haus, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Marie-Thérèse Forster
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Georg-Speyer-Haus, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Joachim P Steinbach
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Georg-Speyer-Haus, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Michael W Ronellenfitsch
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Georg-Speyer-Haus, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Le Fèvre C, Constans JM, Chambrelant I, Antoni D, Bund C, Leroy-Freschini B, Schott R, Cebula H, Noël G. Pseudoprogression versus true progression in glioblastoma patients: A multiapproach literature review. Part 2 - Radiological features and metric markers. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 159:103230. [PMID: 33515701 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
After chemoradiotherapy for glioblastoma, pseudoprogression can occur and must be distinguished from true progression to correctly manage glioblastoma treatment and follow-up. Conventional treatment response assessment is evaluated via conventional MRI (contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and T2/FLAIR), which is unreliable. The emergence of advanced MRI techniques, MR spectroscopy, and PET tracers has improved pseudoprogression diagnostic accuracy. This review presents a literature review of the different imaging techniques and potential imaging biomarkers to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Le Fèvre
- Department of Radiotherapy, ICANS, Institut Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
| | - Jean-Marc Constans
- Department of Radiology, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, 1 rond-point du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054, Amiens Cedex 1, France.
| | - Isabelle Chambrelant
- Department of Radiotherapy, ICANS, Institut Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
| | - Delphine Antoni
- Department of Radiotherapy, ICANS, Institut Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
| | - Caroline Bund
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, ICANS, Institut Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
| | - Benjamin Leroy-Freschini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, ICANS, Institut Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
| | - Roland Schott
- Departement of Medical Oncology, ICANS, Institut Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
| | - Hélène Cebula
- Departement of Neurosurgery, Hautepierre University Hospital, 1, avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Georges Noël
- Department of Radiotherapy, ICANS, Institut Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Koehler A, Karve A, Desai P, Arbiser J, Plas DR, Qi X, Read RD, Sasaki AT, Gawali VS, Toukam DK, Bhattacharya D, Kallay L, Pomeranz Krummel DA, Sengupta S. Reuse of Molecules for Glioblastoma Therapy. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:99. [PMID: 33525329 PMCID: PMC7912673 DOI: 10.3390/ph14020099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly malignant primary brain tumor. The current standard of care for GBM is the Stupp protocol which includes surgical resection, followed by radiotherapy concomitant with the DNA alkylator temozolomide; however, survival under this treatment regimen is an abysmal 12-18 months. New and emerging treatments include the application of a physical device, non-invasive 'tumor treating fields' (TTFs), including its concomitant use with standard of care; and varied vaccines and immunotherapeutics being trialed. Some of these approaches have extended life by a few months over standard of care, but in some cases are only available for a minority of GBM patients. Extensive activity is also underway to repurpose and reposition therapeutics for GBM, either alone or in combination with the standard of care. In this review, we present select molecules that target different pathways and are at various stages of clinical translation as case studies to illustrate the rationale for their repurposing-repositioning and potential clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Koehler
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA; (A.K.); (V.S.G.); (D.K.T.); (D.B.); (L.K.); (D.A.P.K.)
| | - Aniruddha Karve
- Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Cincinnati James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; (A.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Pankaj Desai
- Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Cincinnati James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; (A.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Jack Arbiser
- Department of Dermatology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA;
- Atlanta Veterans Administration Medical Center, Decatur, GA 30033, USA
| | - David R. Plas
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA;
| | - Xiaoyang Qi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA; (X.Q.); (A.T.S.)
| | - Renee D. Read
- Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA;
| | - Atsuo T. Sasaki
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA; (X.Q.); (A.T.S.)
| | - Vaibhavkumar S. Gawali
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA; (A.K.); (V.S.G.); (D.K.T.); (D.B.); (L.K.); (D.A.P.K.)
| | - Donatien K. Toukam
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA; (A.K.); (V.S.G.); (D.K.T.); (D.B.); (L.K.); (D.A.P.K.)
| | - Debanjan Bhattacharya
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA; (A.K.); (V.S.G.); (D.K.T.); (D.B.); (L.K.); (D.A.P.K.)
| | - Laura Kallay
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA; (A.K.); (V.S.G.); (D.K.T.); (D.B.); (L.K.); (D.A.P.K.)
| | - Daniel A. Pomeranz Krummel
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA; (A.K.); (V.S.G.); (D.K.T.); (D.B.); (L.K.); (D.A.P.K.)
| | - Soma Sengupta
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA; (A.K.); (V.S.G.); (D.K.T.); (D.B.); (L.K.); (D.A.P.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Reuter G, Moïse M, Roll W, Martin D, Lombard A, Scholtes F, Stummer W, Suero Molina E. Conventional and advanced imaging throughout the cycle of care of gliomas. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 44:2493-2509. [PMID: 33411093 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01448-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Although imaging of gliomas has evolved tremendously over the last decades, published techniques and protocols are not always implemented into clinical practice. Furthermore, most of the published literature focuses on specific timepoints in glioma management. This article reviews the current literature on conventional and advanced imaging techniques and chronologically outlines their practical relevance for the clinical management of gliomas throughout the cycle of care. Relevant articles were located through the Pubmed/Medline database and included in this review. Interpretation of conventional and advanced imaging techniques is crucial along the entire process of glioma care, from diagnosis to follow-up. In addition to the described currently existing techniques, we expect deep learning or machine learning approaches to assist each step of glioma management through tumor segmentation, radiogenomics, prognostication, and characterization of pseudoprogression. Thorough knowledge of the specific performance, possibilities, and limitations of each imaging modality is key for their adequate use in glioma management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilles Reuter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium. .,GIGA-CRC In-vivo Imaging Center, ULiege, Liège, Belgium.
| | - Martin Moïse
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Wolfgang Roll
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Didier Martin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Arnaud Lombard
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Félix Scholtes
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.,Department of Neuroanatomy, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Walter Stummer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Eric Suero Molina
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Funakoshi Y, Hata N, Kuga D, Hatae R, Sangatsuda Y, Fujioka Y, Takigawa K, Mizoguchi M. Update on Chemotherapeutic Approaches and Management of Bevacizumab Usage for Glioblastoma. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2020; 13:E470. [PMID: 33339404 PMCID: PMC7766528 DOI: 10.3390/ph13120470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor in adults, has one of the most dismal prognoses in cancer. In 2009, bevacizumab was approved for recurrent glioblastoma in the USA. To evaluate the clinical impact of bevacizumab as a first-line drug for glioblastoma, two randomized clinical trials, AVAglio and RTOG 0825, were performed. Bevacizumab was found to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and was reported to be beneficial for maintaining patient performance status as an initial treatment. These outcomes led to bevacizumab approval in Japan in 2013 as an insurance-covered first-line drug for glioblastoma concurrently with its second-line application. However, prolongation of overall survival was not evinced in these clinical trials; hence, the clinical benefit of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastomas remains controversial. A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of bevacizumab combined with temozolomide in recurrent glioblastoma also showed an effect only on PFS, and the benefit of bevacizumab even for recurrent glioblastoma is controversial. Here, we discuss the clinical impact of bevacizumab for glioblastoma treatment by reviewing previous clinical trials and real-world evidence by focusing on Japanese experiences. Moreover, the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab are summarized, and we provide suggestions for updating the approaches and management of bevacizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nobuhiro Hata
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan; (Y.F.); (D.K.); (R.H.); (Y.S.); (Y.F.); (K.T.); (M.M.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Le Fèvre C, Lhermitte B, Ahle G, Chambrelant I, Cebula H, Antoni D, Keller A, Schott R, Thiery A, Constans JM, Noël G. Pseudoprogression versus true progression in glioblastoma patients: A multiapproach literature review: Part 1 - Molecular, morphological and clinical features. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 157:103188. [PMID: 33307200 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
With new therapeutic protocols, more patients treated for glioblastoma have experienced a suspicious radiologic image of progression (pseudoprogression) during follow-up. Pseudoprogression should be differentiated from true progression because the disease management is completely different. In the case of pseudoprogression, the follow-up continues, and the patient is considered stable. In the case of true progression, a treatment adjustment is necessary. Presently, a pseudoprogression diagnosis certainly needs to be pathologically confirmed. Some important efforts in the radiological, histopathological, and genomic fields have been made to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression, and the assessment of response criteria exists but remains limited. The aim of this paper is to highlight clinical and pathological markers to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression through a literature review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Le Fèvre
- Department of Radiotherapy, ICANS, Institut Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Benoît Lhermitte
- Département of Pathology, Hautepierre University Hospital, 1, Avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France
| | - Guido Ahle
- Departement of Neurology, Hôpitaux Civils de Colmar, 39 Avenue de la Liberté, 68024, Colmar, France
| | - Isabelle Chambrelant
- Department of Radiotherapy, ICANS, Institut Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Hélène Cebula
- Departement of Neurosurgery, Hautepierre University Hospital, 1, Avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France
| | - Delphine Antoni
- Department of Radiotherapy, ICANS, Institut Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Audrey Keller
- Department of Radiotherapy, ICANS, Institut Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Roland Schott
- Departement of Medical Oncology, ICANS, Institut Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Alicia Thiery
- Department of Public Health, ICANS, Institut Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Jean-Marc Constans
- Department of Radiology, Amiens-Pïcardie University Hospital, 1 rond point du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054 Amiens Cedex 1, France
| | - Georges Noël
- Department of Radiotherapy, ICANS, Institut Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Discriminating pseudoprogression and true progression in diffuse infiltrating glioma using multi-parametric MRI data through deep learning. Sci Rep 2020; 10:20331. [PMID: 33230285 PMCID: PMC7683728 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77389-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Differentiating pseudoprogression from true tumor progression has become a significant challenge in follow-up of diffuse infiltrating gliomas, particularly high grade, which leads to a potential treatment delay for patients with early glioma recurrence. In this study, we proposed to use a multiparametric MRI data as a sequence input for the convolutional neural network with the recurrent neural network based deep learning structure to discriminate between pseudoprogression and true tumor progression. In this study, 43 biopsy-proven patient data identified as diffuse infiltrating glioma patients whose disease progressed/recurred were used. The dataset consists of five original MRI sequences; pre-contrast T1-weighted, post-contrast T1-weighted, T2-weighted, FLAIR, and ADC images as well as two engineered sequences; T1post-T1pre and T2-FLAIR. Next, we used three CNN-LSTM models with a different set of sequences as input sequences to pass through CNN-LSTM layers. We performed threefold cross-validation in the training dataset and generated the boxplot, accuracy, and ROC curve, AUC from each trained model with the test dataset to evaluate models. The mean accuracy for VGG16 models ranged from 0.44 to 0.60 and the mean AUC ranged from 0.47 to 0.59. For CNN-LSTM model, the mean accuracy ranged from 0.62 to 0.75 and the mean AUC ranged from 0.64 to 0.81. The performance of the proposed CNN-LSTM with multiparametric sequence data was found to outperform the popular convolutional CNN with a single MRI sequence. In conclusion, incorporating all available MRI sequences into a sequence input for a CNN-LSTM model improved diagnostic performance for discriminating between pseudoprogression and true tumor progression.
Collapse
|
25
|
Cho SJ, Kim HS, Suh CH, Park JE. Radiological Recurrence Patterns after Bevacizumab Treatment of Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Korean J Radiol 2020; 21:908-918. [PMID: 32524791 PMCID: PMC7289701 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To categorize the radiological patterns of recurrence after bevacizumab treatment and to derive the pooled proportions of patients with recurrent malignant glioma showing the different radiological patterns. Materials and Methods A systematic literature search in the Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed to identify studies reporting radiological recurrence patterns in patients with recurrent malignant glioma after bevacizumab treatment failure until April 10, 2019. The pooled proportions according to radiological recurrence patterns (geographically local versus non-local recurrence) and predominant tumor portions (enhancing tumor versus non-enhancing tumor) after bevacizumab treatment were calculated. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were also performed. Results The systematic review and meta-analysis included 17 articles. The pooled proportions were 38.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.6–46.1%) for a geographical radiologic pattern of non-local recurrence and 34.2% (95% CI, 27.3–41.5%) for a non-enhancing tumor-predominant recurrence pattern. In the subgroup analysis, the pooled proportion of non-local recurrence in the patients treated with bevacizumab only was slightly higher than that in patients treated with the combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy (34.9% [95% CI, 22.8–49.4%] versus 22.5% [95% CI, 9.5–44.6%]). Conclusion A substantial proportion of high-grade glioma patients show non-local or non-enhancing radiologic patterns of recurrence after bevacizumab treatment, which may provide insight into surrogate endpoints for treatment failure in clinical trials of recurrent high-grade glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Se Jin Cho
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Ho Sung Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Chong Hyun Suh
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Eun Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Machine Learning Model to Predict Pseudoprogression Versus Progression in Glioblastoma Using MRI: A Multi-Institutional Study (KROG 18-07). Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12092706. [PMID: 32967367 PMCID: PMC7564954 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Even after the introduction of a standard regimen consisting of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide, patients with glioblastoma multiforme mostly experience disease progression. Clinicians often encounter a situation where they need to distinguish progressive disease from pseudoprogression after treatment. We tried to investigate the feasibility of machine learning algorithm to distinguish pseudoprogression from progressive disease. In multi-institutional dataset, the developed machine learning model showed an acceptable performance. This algorithm involving MRI data and clinical features could help making decision during patients’ disease course. For the practical use, we calibrated the machine learning model to offer the probability of pseudoprogression to clinicians, then we constructed the web-based user interface to access the model. Abstract Some patients with glioblastoma show a worsening presentation in imaging after concurrent chemoradiation, even when they receive gross total resection. Previously, we showed the feasibility of a machine learning model to predict pseudoprogression (PsPD) versus progressive disease (PD) in glioblastoma patients. The previous model was based on the dataset from two institutions (termed as the Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) dataset, N = 78). To test this model in a larger dataset, we collected cases from multiple institutions that raised the problem of PsPD vs. PD diagnosis in clinics (Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KROG) dataset, N = 104). The dataset was composed of brain MR images and clinical information. We tested the previous model in the KROG dataset; however, that model showed limited performance. After hyperparameter optimization, we developed a deep learning model based on the whole dataset (N = 182). The 10-fold cross validation revealed that the micro-average area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) was 0.86. The calibration model was constructed to estimate the interpretable probability directly from the model output. After calibration, the final model offers clinical probability in a web-user interface.
Collapse
|
27
|
Wen PY, Weller M, Lee EQ, Alexander BM, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Barthel FP, Batchelor TT, Bindra RS, Chang SM, Chiocca EA, Cloughesy TF, DeGroot JF, Galanis E, Gilbert MR, Hegi ME, Horbinski C, Huang RY, Lassman AB, Le Rhun E, Lim M, Mehta MP, Mellinghoff IK, Minniti G, Nathanson D, Platten M, Preusser M, Roth P, Sanson M, Schiff D, Short SC, Taphoorn MJB, Tonn JC, Tsang J, Verhaak RGW, von Deimling A, Wick W, Zadeh G, Reardon DA, Aldape KD, van den Bent MJ. Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions. Neuro Oncol 2020; 22:1073-1113. [PMID: 32328653 PMCID: PMC7594557 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 550] [Impact Index Per Article: 137.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastomas are the most common form of malignant primary brain tumor and an important cause of morbidity and mortality. In recent years there have been important advances in understanding the molecular pathogenesis and biology of these tumors, but this has not translated into significantly improved outcomes for patients. In this consensus review from the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO), the current management of isocitrate dehydrogenase wildtype (IDHwt) glioblastomas will be discussed. In addition, novel therapies such as targeted molecular therapies, agents targeting DNA damage response and metabolism, immunotherapies, and viral therapies will be reviewed, as well as the current challenges and future directions for research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Y Wen
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eudocia Quant Lee
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian M Alexander
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Floris P Barthel
- The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Tracy T Batchelor
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School
| | - Ranjit S Bindra
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Susan M Chang
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - E Antonio Chiocca
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - John F DeGroot
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Monika E Hegi
- Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Craig Horbinski
- Department of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Division of Neuroradiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew B Lassman
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- University of Lille, Inserm, Neuro-oncology, General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery service, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France; Breast Cancer Department, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France and Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Lim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Ingo K Mellinghoff
- Department of Neurology and Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - David Nathanson
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michael Platten
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, MCTN, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Patrick Roth
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marc Sanson
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière – Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris, France
| | - David Schiff
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Susan C Short
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Martin J B Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague and Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jonathan Tsang
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Roel G W Verhaak
- The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Neuropathology and Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, University Heidelberg and German Cancer Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Department of Neurology and Neuro-oncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gelareh Zadeh
- MacFeeters Hamilton Centre for Neuro-Oncology Research, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - David A Reardon
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kenneth D Aldape
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
|
29
|
Neurologic Complications of Cranial Radiation Therapy and Strategies to Prevent or Reduce Radiation Toxicity. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2020; 20:34. [DOI: 10.1007/s11910-020-01051-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
30
|
Su JMF, Murray JC, McNall-Knapp RY, Bowers DC, Shah S, Adesina AM, Paulino AC, Jo E, Mo Q, Baxter PA, Blaney SM. A phase 2 study of valproic acid and radiation, followed by maintenance valproic acid and bevacizumab in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma or high-grade glioma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 67:e28283. [PMID: 32285998 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To study the efficacy and tolerability of valproic acid (VPA) and radiation, followed by VPA and bevacizumab in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) or high-grade glioma (HGG). METHODS Children 3 to 21 years of age received radiation therapy and VPA at 15 mg/kg/day and dose adjusted to maintain a trough range of 85 to 115 μg/mL. VPA was continued post-radiation, and bevacizumab was started at 10 mg/kg intravenously biweekly, four weeks after completing radiation therapy. RESULTS From September 2009 through August 2015, 20 DIPG and 18 HGG patients were enrolled (NCT00879437). During radiation and VPA, grade 3 or higher toxicities requiring discontinuation or modification of VPA dosing included grade 3 thrombocytopenia (1), grade 3 weight gain (1), and grade 3 pancreatitis (1). During VPA and bevacizumab, the most common grade 3 or higher toxicities were grade 3 neutropenia (3), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (3), grade 3 fatigue (3), and grade 3 hypertension (4). Two patients discontinued protocol therapy prior to disease progression (one grade 4 thrombosis and one grade 1 intratumoral hemorrhage). Median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for DIPG were 7.8 (95% CI 5.6-8.2) and 10.3 (7.4-13.4) months, and estimated one-year EFS was 12% (2%-31%). Median EFS and OS for HGG were 9.1 (6.4-11) and 12.1 (10-22.1) months, and estimated one-year EFS was 24% (7%-45%). Four patients with glioblastoma and mismatch-repair deficiency syndrome had EFS of 28.5, 16.7, 10.4, and 9 months. CONCLUSION Addition of VPA and bevacizumab to radiation was well tolerated but did not appear to improve EFS or OS in children with DIPG or HGG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Meng-Fen Su
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Rene Y McNall-Knapp
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Daniel C Bowers
- Children's Medical Center/The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Shafqat Shah
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, San Antonio, Texas
| | | | - Arnold C Paulino
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Eunji Jo
- Dan L Duncan Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Houston, Texas
| | - Qianxing Mo
- Dan L Duncan Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Houston, Texas
| | - Patricia A Baxter
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan M Blaney
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Schregel K, Nowicki MO, Palotai M, Nazari N, Zane R, Sinkus R, Lawler SE, Patz S. Magnetic Resonance Elastography reveals effects of anti-angiogenic glioblastoma treatment on tumor stiffness and captures progression in an orthotopic mouse model. Cancer Imaging 2020; 20:35. [PMID: 32398076 PMCID: PMC7218549 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00314-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Anti-angiogenic treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) complicates radiologic monitoring. We evaluated magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) as an imaging tool for monitoring the efficacy of anti-VEGF treatment of GBM. Methods Longitudinal studies were performed in an orthotopic GBM xenograft mouse model. Animals treated with B20 anti-VEGF antibody were compared to untreated controls regarding survival (n = 13), classical MRI-contrasts and biomechanics as quantified via MRE (n = 15). Imaging was performed on a 7 T small animal horizontal bore MRI scanner. MRI and MRE parameters were compared to histopathology. Results Anti-VEGF-treated animals survived longer than untreated controls (p = 0.0011) with progressively increased tumor volume in controls (p = 0.0001). MRE parameters viscoelasticity |G*| and phase angle Y significantly decreased in controls (p = 0.02 for |G*| and p = 0.0071 for Y). This indicates that untreated tumors became softer and more elastic than viscous with progression. Tumor volume in treated animals increased more slowly than in controls, indicating efficacy of the therapy, reaching significance only at the last time point (p = 0.02). Viscoelasticity and phase angle Y tended to decrease throughout therapy, similar as for control animals. However, in treated animals, the decrease in phase angle Y was significantly attenuated and reached statistical significance at the last time point (p = 0.04). Histopathologically, control tumors were larger and more heterogeneous than treated tumors. Vasculature was normalized in treated tumors compared with controls, which showed abnormal vasculature and necrosis. In treated tumors, a higher amount of myelin was observed within the tumor area (p = 0.03), likely due to increased tumor invasion. Stiffness of the contralateral hemisphere was influenced by tumor mass effect and edema. Conclusions Anti-angiogenic GBM treatment prolonged animal survival, slowed tumor growth and softening, but did not prevent progression. MRE detected treatment effects on tumor stiffness; the decrease of viscoelasticity and phase angle in GBM was attenuated in treated animals, which might be explained by normalized vasculature and greater myelin preservation within treated tumors. Thus, further investigation of MRE is warranted to understand the potential for MRE in monitoring treatment in GBM patients by complementing existing MRI techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Schregel
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. .,Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Institute of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
| | - Michal O Nowicki
- Harvey Cushing Neurooncology Laboratories, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Miklos Palotai
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Navid Nazari
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rachel Zane
- Harvey Cushing Neurooncology Laboratories, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ralph Sinkus
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.,INSERM U1148, Laboratory for Vascular Translational Science, University Paris Diderot, University Paris 13, Paris, France
| | - Sean E Lawler
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. .,Harvey Cushing Neurooncology Laboratories, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Samuel Patz
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lee A, Arasaratnam M, Chan DLH, Khasraw M, Howell VM, Wheeler H. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy for glioblastoma in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 5:CD013238. [PMID: 32395825 PMCID: PMC7389448 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013238.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma is an uncommon but highly aggressive type of brain tumour. Significant gains have been achieved in the molecular understanding and the pathogenesis of glioblastomas, however clinical improvements are difficult to obtain for many reasons. The current standard of care involves maximal safe surgical resection followed by chemoradiation and then adjuvant chemotherapy European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the NCIC Clinical Trials Group (EORTC-NCIC) protocol with a median survival of 14.6 months. Successive phase III international randomised controlled studies have failed to significantly demonstrate survival advantage with newer drugs. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is observed to be aberrant in 30% to 60% of glioblastomas. The receptor aberrancy is driven by abnormal gene amplification, receptor mutation, or both, in particular the extracellular vIII domain. EGFR abnormalities are common in solid tumours, and the advent of anti-EGFR therapies in non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal adenocarcinomas have greatly improved clinical outcomes. Anti-EGFR therapies have been investigated amongst glioblastomas, however questions remain about its ongoing role in glioblastoma management. This review aimed to report on the available evidence to date and perform a systematic analysis on the risks and benefits of use of anti-EGFR therapies in glioblastomas. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy and harms of anti-EGFR therapies for glioblastoma in adults. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, EBM Reviews databases, with supplementary handsearches to identify all available and relevant studies to 20 April 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using anti-EGFR therapies in adults with glioblastoma were eligible for inclusion. Anti-EGFR therapies included tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, or vaccines. The comparison included investigational product added to standard of care versus standard of care or placebo, or investigational product against standard of care or placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The authorship team screened the search results and recorded the extracted data for analysis. We used standard Cochrane methodology to performed quantitative meta-analysis if two or more studies had appropriate and available data. Otherwise, we conducted a qualitative and descriptive analysis. We used the GRADE system to rate the certainty of the evidence. The analysis was performed along the two clinical settings: first-line (after surgery) and recurrent disease (after failure of first line treatment). Where information was available, we documented overall survival, progression-free survival, adverse events, and quality of life data from eligible studies. MAIN RESULTS The combined searches initially identified 912 records (after removal of duplicates), and further screening resulted in 19 records for full consideration. We identified nine eligible studies for inclusion in the review. There were three first-line studies and six recurrent studies. Five studies used tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs); two studies used monoclonal antibodies; and two studies used targeted vaccines. More recent studies presented greater detail in the conduct of their studies and thus had a lower risk of bias. We observed no evidence benefit in overall survival with the use of anti-EGFR therapy in the first-line or recurrent setting (hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 1.04; 3 RCTs, 1000 participants, moderate-certainty evidence; and HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.21, 4 RCTs, 489 participants, low-certainty evidence, respectively). All the interventions were generally well tolerated with low-certainty evidence for lymphopenia (odds ratio (OR) 0.97, 95% CI 0.19 to 4.81; 4 RCTs, 1146 participants), neutropenia (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.82 to 2.03; 4 RCTs, 1146 participants), and thrombocytopenia (OR 3.69, 95% CI 0.51 to 26.51; 4 RCTs, 1146 participants). A notable toxicity relates to ABT-414, where significant ocular issues were detected. The addition of anti-EGFR therapy showed no evidence of an increase in progression-free survival (PFS) in the first-line setting (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.10; 2 RCTs, 894 participants, low-certainty evidence). In the recurrent setting, there was an increase in PFS with the use of anti-EGFR therapy (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.96, 3 RCTs, 275 participants, low-certainty evidence). The available quality of life assessment data showed that anti-EGFR therapies were neither detrimental or beneficial when compared to standard care (not estimable). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In summary, there is no evidence of a demonstrable overall survival benefit with the addition of anti-EGFR therapy in first-line and recurrent glioblastomas. Newer drugs that are specially designed for glioblastoma targets may raise the possibility of success in this population, but data are lacking at present. Future studies should be more selective in pursuing people displaying specific EGFR targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - David Lok Hang Chan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mustafa Khasraw
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Viive M Howell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Helen Wheeler
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Oncolytic Virus Encoding a Master Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Interleukin 12 in Cancer Immunotherapy. Cells 2020; 9:cells9020400. [PMID: 32050597 PMCID: PMC7072539 DOI: 10.3390/cells9020400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2019] [Revised: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are genetically modified or naturally occurring viruses, which preferentially replicate in and kill cancer cells while sparing healthy cells, and induce anti-tumor immunity. OV-induced tumor immunity can be enhanced through viral expression of anti-tumor cytokines such as interleukin 12 (IL-12). IL-12 is a potent anti-cancer agent that promotes T-helper 1 (Th1) differentiation, facilitates T-cell-mediated killing of cancer cells, and inhibits tumor angiogenesis. Despite success in preclinical models, systemic IL-12 therapy is associated with significant toxicity in humans. Therefore, to utilize the therapeutic potential of IL-12 in OV-based cancer therapy, 25 different IL-12 expressing OVs (OV-IL12s) have been genetically engineered for local IL-12 production and tested preclinically in various cancer models. Among OV-IL12s, oncolytic herpes simplex virus encoding IL-12 (OHSV-IL12) is the furthest along in the clinic. IL-12 expression locally in the tumors avoids systemic toxicity while inducing an efficient anti-tumor immunity and synergizes with anti-angiogenic drugs or immunomodulators without compromising safety. Despite the rapidly rising interest, there are no current reviews on OV-IL12s that exploit their potential efficacy and safety to translate into human subjects. In this article, we will discuss safety, tumor-specificity, and anti-tumor immune/anti-angiogenic effects of OHSV-IL12 as mono- and combination-therapies. In addition to OHSV-IL12 viruses, we will also review other IL-12-expressing OVs and their application in cancer therapy.
Collapse
|
34
|
Combined analysis of MGMT methylation and dynamic-susceptibility-contrast MRI for the distinction between early and pseudo-progression in glioblastoma patients. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2019; 175:534-543. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2019.01.400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Revised: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
35
|
Reardon DA, Weller M. Pseudoprogression: fact or wishful thinking in neuro-oncology? Lancet Oncol 2019; 19:1561-1563. [PMID: 30507413 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30654-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David A Reardon
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215-5450, USA.
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Regorafenib in patients with recurrent high-grade astrocytoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2019; 145:1037-1042. [PMID: 30820715 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-019-02868-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Antiangiogenic treatment approaches have failed to improve outcome in randomized trials of high-grade astrocytoma. One key mechanism of resistance to antiangiogenic treatment may concern the upregulation of alternative pro-angiogenic pathways. Regorafenib is a potent multikinase inhibitor that may alter some of those pathways. In this retrospective study, we investigated efficacy and radiographic tumor growth patterns of regorafenib in recurrent high-grade astrocytoma. METHODS We screened for patients with high-grade astrocytoma in whom regorafenib was administered for at least 4 weeks. We assessed treatment efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and adverse events defined by Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). In addition, radiographic tumor growth patterns were determined at baseline and recurrence. RESULTS A total of 6 patients met eligibility criteria. The number of recurrences prior to regorafenib varied between 2 and 6. Patients were on regorafenib treatment for at least 4 weeks and maximally 14 weeks. Median PFS was 3.5 months and ranged from 2.0 to 4.0 months. Radiographic response was progressive disease in all patients with an objective response rate of 0%. CTC°3 adverse events were observed in all but one patient. The most common radiographic growth pattern was local with no change in growth pattern at recurrence. An infiltrative tumor growth was not induced in any patient. CONCLUSIONS This retrospective study indicates a very poor performance of regorafenib in recurrent high-grade astrocytoma with a fairly high number of CTC°3 adverse events. In addition, regorafenib does not seem to bear a potential for infiltrative tumor growth promotion.
Collapse
|
37
|
Chukwueke UN, Wen PY. Use of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria in clinical trials and clinical practice. CNS Oncol 2019; 8:CNS28. [PMID: 30806082 PMCID: PMC6499019 DOI: 10.2217/cns-2018-0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ugonma N Chukwueke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nowosielski M, Ellingson BM, Chinot OL, Garcia J, Revil C, Radbruch A, Nishikawa R, Mason WP, Henriksson R, Saran F, Kickingereder P, Platten M, Sandmann T, Abrey LE, Cloughesy TF, Bendszus M, Wick W. Radiologic progression of glioblastoma under therapy-an exploratory analysis of AVAglio. Neuro Oncol 2019; 20:557-566. [PMID: 29016943 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In this exploratory analysis of AVAglio, a randomized phase III clinical study that investigated the addition of bevacizumab (Bev) to radiotherapy/temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma, we aim to radiologically characterize glioblastoma on therapy until progression and investigate whether the type of radiologic progression differs between treatment arms and is related to survival and molecular data. Methods Five progression types (PTs) were categorized using an adapted algorithm according to MRI contrast enhancement behavior in T1- and T2-weighted images in 621 patients (Bev, n = 299; placebo, n = 322). Frequencies of PTs (designated as classic T1, cT1 relapse, T2 diffuse, T2 circumscribed, and primary nonresponder), time to progression (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed within each treatment arm and compared with molecular subtypes and O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status. Results PT frequencies differed between the Bev and placebo arms, except for "T2 diffuse" (12.4% and 7.1%, respectively). PTs showed differences in PFS and OS; with "T2 diffuse" being associated with longest survival. Complete disappearance of contrast enhancement during treatment ("cT1 relapse") showed longer survival than only partial contrast enhancement decrease ("classic T1"). "T2 diffuse" was more commonly MGMT hypermethylated. Only weak correlations to molecular subtypes from primary tissue were detected. Conclusions Progression of glioblastoma under therapy can be characterized radiologically. These radiologic phenotypes are influenced by treatment and develop differently over time with differential outcomes. Complete resolution of contrast enhancement during treatment is a favorable factor for outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Nowosielski
- Medical University Innsbruck, Department of Neurology, Innsbruck, Austria.,University Medical Center, Neurology, and Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center and the German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory and Neuro-Oncology Program, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Olivier L Chinot
- Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, CHU Timone, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Roger Henriksson
- Regional Cancer Center Stockholm and Umeå University, Stockholm and Umeå, Sweden
| | - Frank Saran
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK
| | | | - Michael Platten
- University Medical Center, Neurology, and Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center and the German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.,Neurology University Clinic, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Lauren E Abrey
- University Medical Center, Neuroradiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory and Neuro-Oncology Program, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Martin Bendszus
- University Medical Center, Neuroradiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- University Medical Center, Neurology, and Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center and the German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Falchetti ML, D'Alessandris QG, Pacioni S, Buccarelli M, Morgante L, Giannetti S, Lulli V, Martini M, Larocca LM, Vakana E, Stancato L, Ricci-Vitiani L, Pallini R. Glioblastoma endothelium drives bevacizumab-induced infiltrative growth via modulation of PLXDC1. Int J Cancer 2018; 144:1331-1344. [PMID: 30414187 PMCID: PMC6590500 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2018] [Revised: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Bevacizumab, a VEGF‐targeting monoclonal antibody, may trigger an infiltrative growth pattern in glioblastoma. We investigated this pattern using both a human specimen and rat models. In the human specimen, a substantial fraction of infiltrating tumor cells were located along perivascular spaces in close relationship with endothelial cells. Brain xenografts of U87MG cells treated with bevacizumab were smaller than controls (p = 0.0055; Student t‐test), however, bands of tumor cells spread through the brain farther than controls (p < 0.001; Student t‐test). Infiltrating tumor Cells exhibited tropism for vascular structures and propensity to form tubules and niches with endothelial cells. Molecularly, bevacizumab triggered an epithelial to mesenchymal transition with over‐expression of the receptor Plexin Domain Containing 1 (PLXDC1). These results were validated using brain xenografts of patient‐derived glioma stem‐like cells. Enforced expression of PLXDC1 in U87MG cells promoted brain infiltration along perivascular spaces. Importantly, PLXDC1 inhibition prevented perivascular infiltration and significantly increased the survival of bevacizumab‐treated rats. Our study indicates that bevacizumab‐induced brain infiltration is driven by vascular endothelium and depends on PLXDC1 activation of tumor cells. What's new? Bevacizumab, a VEGF‐targeting monoclonal antibody, has been observed to trigger an infiltrative growth pattern in glioblastoma as an escape mechanism. The mechanisms underlying this gliomatosis‐like growth pattern, however, remain unclear. Here, the authors found that the infiltrative growth pattern occurs mostly along perivascular spaces and relies on the over‐expression of PLXDC1 by tumor cells and on the restoration of the endothelial component of blood brain barrier. Altogether, the data show that the brain infiltration induced by bevacizumab is mainly driven by the vascular endothelium. Importantly, inhibition of PLXDC1 prevents bevacizumab‐induced infiltrative growth, resulting in significant increase of survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Quintino Giorgio D'Alessandris
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Pacioni
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariachiara Buccarelli
- Department of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Liliana Morgante
- Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Universitá Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Giannetti
- Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Universitá Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Lulli
- Department of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Martini
- Pathology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Maria Larocca
- Pathology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Eliza Vakana
- Discovery Research, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Louis Stancato
- Discovery Research, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Lucia Ricci-Vitiani
- Department of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Pallini
- Institute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ismail M, Hill V, Statsevych V, Huang R, Prasanna P, Correa R, Singh G, Bera K, Beig N, Thawani R, Madabhushi A, Aahluwalia M, Tiwari P. Shape Features of the Lesion Habitat to Differentiate Brain Tumor Progression from Pseudoprogression on Routine Multiparametric MRI: A Multisite Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018; 39:2187-2193. [PMID: 30385468 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Differentiating pseudoprogression, a radiation-induced treatment effect, from tumor progression on imaging is a substantial challenge in glioblastoma management. Unfortunately, guidelines set by the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria are based solely on bidirectional diametric measurements of enhancement observed on T1WI and T2WI/FLAIR scans. We hypothesized that quantitative 3D shape features of the enhancing lesion on T1WI, and T2WI/FLAIR hyperintensities (together called the lesion habitat) can more comprehensively capture pathophysiologic differences across pseudoprogression and tumor recurrence, not appreciable on diametric measurements alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 105 glioblastoma studies from 2 institutions were analyzed, consisting of a training (n = 59) and an independent test (n = 46) cohort. For every study, expert delineation of the lesion habitat (T1WI enhancing lesion and T2WI/FLAIR hyperintense perilesional region) was obtained, followed by extraction of 30 shape features capturing 14 "global" contour characteristics and 16 "local" curvature measures for every habitat region. Feature selection was used to identify most discriminative features on the training cohort, which were evaluated on the test cohort using a support vector machine classifier. RESULTS The top 2 most discriminative features were identified as local features capturing total curvature of the enhancing lesion and curvedness of the T2WI/FLAIR hyperintense perilesional region. Using top features from the training cohort (training accuracy = 91.5%), we obtained an accuracy of 90.2% on the test set in distinguishing pseudoprogression from tumor progression. CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary results suggest that 3D shape attributes from the lesion habitat can differentially express across pseudoprogression and tumor progression and could be used to distinguish these radiographically similar pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ismail
- From the Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.I., P.P., R.C., G.S., K.B., N.B., R.T., A.M., P.T.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - V Hill
- Department of Neuroradiology (V.H., V.S.), Imaging Institute
| | - V Statsevych
- Department of Neuroradiology (V.H., V.S.), Imaging Institute
| | - R Huang
- Department of Radiology (R.H.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - P Prasanna
- From the Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.I., P.P., R.C., G.S., K.B., N.B., R.T., A.M., P.T.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - R Correa
- From the Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.I., P.P., R.C., G.S., K.B., N.B., R.T., A.M., P.T.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - G Singh
- From the Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.I., P.P., R.C., G.S., K.B., N.B., R.T., A.M., P.T.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - K Bera
- From the Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.I., P.P., R.C., G.S., K.B., N.B., R.T., A.M., P.T.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - N Beig
- From the Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.I., P.P., R.C., G.S., K.B., N.B., R.T., A.M., P.T.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - R Thawani
- From the Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.I., P.P., R.C., G.S., K.B., N.B., R.T., A.M., P.T.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - A Madabhushi
- From the Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.I., P.P., R.C., G.S., K.B., N.B., R.T., A.M., P.T.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - M Aahluwalia
- Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center (M.A.), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - P Tiwari
- From the Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.I., P.P., R.C., G.S., K.B., N.B., R.T., A.M., P.T.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Eijgelaar RS, Bruynzeel AME, Lagerwaard FJ, Müller DMJ, Teunissen FR, Barkhof F, van Herk M, De Witt Hamer PC, Witte MG. Earliest radiological progression in glioblastoma by multidisciplinary consensus review. J Neurooncol 2018; 139:591-598. [PMID: 29777418 PMCID: PMC6132963 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2896-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detection of glioblastoma progression is important for clinical decision-making on cessation or initiation of therapy, for enrollment in clinical trials, and for response measurement in time and location. The RANO-criteria are considered standard for the timing of progression. To evaluate local treatment, we aim to find the most accurate progression location. We determined the differences in progression free survival (PFS) and in tumor volumes at progression (Vprog) by three definitions of progression. METHODS In a consecutive cohort of 73 patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma between 1/1/2012 and 31/12/2013, progression was established according to three definitions. We determined (1) earliest radiological progression (ERP) by retrospective multidisciplinary consensus review using all available imaging and follow-up, (2) clinical practice progression (CPP) from multidisciplinary tumor board conclusions, and (3) progression by the RANO-criteria. RESULTS ERP was established in 63 (86%), CPP in 64 (88%), RANO progression in 42 (58%). Of the 63 patients who had died, 37 (59%) did with prior RANO-progression, compared to 57 (90%) for both ERP and CPP. The median overall survival was 15.3 months. The median PFS was 8.8 months for ERP, 9.5 months for CPP, and 11.8 months for RANO. The PFS by ERP was shorter than CPP (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.84, p = 0.004) and RANO-progression (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.19-0.43, p < 0.001). The Vprog were significantly smaller for ERP (median 8.8 mL), than for CPP (17 mL) and RANO (22 mL). CONCLUSION PFS and Vprog vary considerably between progression definitions. Earliest radiological progression by retrospective consensus review should be considered to accurately localize progression and to address confounding of lead time bias in clinical trial enrollment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roelant S Eijgelaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank J Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Domenique M J Müller
- Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Freek R Teunissen
- Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marcel van Herk
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester and Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Philip C De Witt Hamer
- Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix G Witte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Piper RJ, Senthil KK, Yan JL, Price SJ. Neuroimaging classification of progression patterns in glioblastoma: a systematic review. J Neurooncol 2018; 139:77-88. [PMID: 29603080 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2843-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2017] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our primary objective was to report the current neuroimaging classification systems of spatial patterns of progression in glioblastoma. In addition, we aimed to report the terminology used to describe 'progression' and to assess the compliance with the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria. METHODS We conducted a systematic review to identify all neuroimaging studies of glioblastoma that have employed a categorical classification system of spatial progression patterns. Our review was registered with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) registry. RESULTS From the included 157 results, we identified 129 studies that used labels of spatial progression patterns that were not based on radiation volumes (Group 1) and 50 studies that used labels that were based on radiation volumes (Group 2). In Group 1, we found 113 individual labels and the most frequent were: local/localised (58%), distant/distal (51%), diffuse (20%), multifocal (15%) and subependymal/subventricular zone (15%). We identified 13 different labels used to refer to 'progression', of which the most frequent were 'recurrence' (99%) and 'progression' (92%). We identified that 37% (n = 33/90) of the studies published following the release of the RANO classification were adherent compliant with the RANO criteria. CONCLUSIONS Our review reports significant heterogeneity in the published systems used to classify glioblastoma spatial progression patterns. Standardization of terminology and classification systems used in studying progression would increase the efficiency of our research in our attempts to more successfully treat glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rory J Piper
- Cambridge Brain Tumour Imaging Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Hill's Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Keerthi K Senthil
- Cambridge Brain Tumour Imaging Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Hill's Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Jiun-Lin Yan
- Cambridge Brain Tumour Imaging Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Hill's Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Stephen J Price
- Cambridge Brain Tumour Imaging Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Hill's Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Schaub C, Kebir S, Junold N, Hattingen E, Schäfer N, Steinbach JP, Weyerbrock A, Hau P, Goldbrunner R, Niessen M, Mack F, Stuplich M, Tzaridis T, Bähr O, Kortmann RD, Schlegel U, Schmidt-Graf F, Rohde V, Braun C, Hänel M, Sabel M, Gerlach R, Krex D, Belka C, Vatter H, Proescholdt M, Herrlinger U, Glas M. Tumor growth patterns of MGMT-non-methylated glioblastoma in the randomized GLARIUS trial. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2018; 144:1581-1589. [PMID: 29808316 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-018-2671-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/16/2018] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated patterns of tumor growth in patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-non-methylated glioblastoma who were assigned to undergo radiotherapy in conjunction with bevacizumab/irinotecan (BEV/IRI) or standard temozolomide (TMZ) within the randomized phase II GLARIUS trial. METHODS In 142 patients (94 BEV/IRI, 48 TMZ), we reviewed magnetic resonance imaging scans at baseline and first tumor recurrence. Based on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images, we assessed tumor growth patterns and tumor invasiveness. Tumor growth patterns were classified as either multifocal or local at baseline and recurrence; at first recurrence, we additionally assessed whether distant lesions appeared. Invasiveness was determined as either diffuse or non-diffuse. Associations with treatment arms were calculated using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS At baseline, 115 of 142 evaluable patients (81%) had a locally confined tumor. Between treatment arms, there was no significant difference in the fraction of tumors that changed from an initially local tumor growth pattern to a multifocal pattern (12 and 13%, p = 0.55). Distant lesions appeared in 17% (BEV/IRI) and 13% (TMZ) of patients (p = 0.69). 15% of patients in the BEV/IRI arm and 8% in the TMZ arm developed a diffuse growth pattern from an initially non-diffuse pattern (p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS The tumor growth and invasiveness patterns do not differ between BEV/IRI and TMZ-treated MGMT-non-methylated glioblastoma patients in the GLARIUS trial. BEV/IRI was not associated with an increased rate of multifocal, distant, or highly invasive tumors at the time of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Schaub
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Sied Kebir
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen and German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Nina Junold
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Neuroradiology; Department of Radiology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Niklas Schäfer
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen and German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Joachim P Steinbach
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Astrid Weyerbrock
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter Hau
- Department of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander NeuroOncology Unit, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Michael Niessen
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Frederic Mack
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Moritz Stuplich
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Theophilos Tzaridis
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Oliver Bähr
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Uwe Schlegel
- Department of Neurology, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Klinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Friederike Schmidt-Graf
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Veit Rohde
- Department of Neurosurgery, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Christian Braun
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Mathias Hänel
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Michael Sabel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Gerlach
- Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Dietmar Krex
- Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Martin Proescholdt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
| | - Martin Glas
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany. .,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen and German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. .,Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kebir S, Rauschenbach L, Gielen GH, Schäfer N, Tzaridis T, Scheffler B, Giordano FA, Lazaridis L, Herrlinger U, Glas M. Recurrent pseudoprogression in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutant glioblastoma. J Clin Neurosci 2018; 53:255-258. [PMID: 29754968 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.04.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2018] [Accepted: 04/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
In a subset of glioblastoma (GBM) patients, the differentiation between tumor progression and tumor pseudoprogression (PsP) is challenging. This case describes a male patient suffering from isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutant GBM who demonstrated an increasing contrast-enhancing (CE) lesion on a cranial magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) scan 8 months after radiochemotherapy. In accordance with the response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria, the cMRI lesion was classified as recurrent tumor, although 18F-fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography (18F-FET-PET) did not indicate vital tumor tissue. The patient underwent re-surgery but histopathology only revealed reactive and necrotic tissue, consistent with PsP. Nine weeks after complete resection of the CE lesion, a new lesion emerged that later regressed in the follow-up cMRI scans, thereby retrospectively establishing the diagnosis of recurrent PsP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sied Kebir
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ) & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Division of Translational Oncology/Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Laurèl Rauschenbach
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ) & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Division of Translational Oncology/Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Gerrit H Gielen
- Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Niklas Schäfer
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Theophilos Tzaridis
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Björn Scheffler
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ) & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Division of Translational Oncology/Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Lazaros Lazaridis
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ) & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Division of Translational Oncology/Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Martin Glas
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ) & German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Division of Translational Oncology/Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Thust SC, van den Bent MJ, Smits M. Pseudoprogression of brain tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 48:571-589. [PMID: 29734497 PMCID: PMC6175399 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
This review describes the definition, incidence, clinical implications, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of pseudoprogression of brain tumors, in particular, but not limited to, high-grade glioma. Pseudoprogression is an important clinical problem after brain tumor treatment, interfering not only with day-to-day patient care but also the execution and interpretation of clinical trials. Radiologically, pseudoprogression is defined as a new or enlarging area(s) of contrast agent enhancement, in the absence of true tumor growth, which subsides or stabilizes without a change in therapy. The clinical definitions of pseudoprogression have been quite variable, which may explain some of the differences in reported incidences, which range from 9-30%. Conventional structural MRI is insufficient for distinguishing pseudoprogression from true progressive disease, and advanced imaging is needed to obtain higher levels of diagnostic certainty. Perfusion MRI is the most widely used imaging technique to diagnose pseudoprogression and has high reported diagnostic accuracy. Diagnostic performance of MR spectroscopy (MRS) appears to be somewhat higher, but MRS is less suitable for the routine and universal application in brain tumor follow-up. The combination of MRS and diffusion-weighted imaging and/or perfusion MRI seems to be particularly powerful, with diagnostic accuracy reaching up to or even greater than 90%. While diagnostic performance can be high with appropriate implementation and interpretation, even a combination of techniques, however, does not provide 100% accuracy. It should also be noted that most studies to date are small, heterogeneous, and retrospective in nature. Future improvements in diagnostic accuracy can be expected with harmonization of acquisition and postprocessing, quantitative MRI and computer-aided diagnostic technology, and meticulous evaluation with clinical and pathological data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie C. Thust
- Lysholm Neuroradiology DepartmentNational Hospital for Neurology and NeurosurgeryLondonUK
- Department of Brain Rehabilitation and RepairUCL Institute of NeurologyLondonUK
- Imaging DepartmentUniversity College London HospitalLondonUK
| | - Martin J. van den Bent
- Department of NeurologyThe Brain Tumor Centre at Erasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MCUniversity Medical Centre RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Saha D, Wakimoto H, Peters CW, Antoszczyk SJ, Rabkin SD, Martuza RL. Combinatorial Effects of VEGFR Kinase Inhibitor Axitinib and Oncolytic Virotherapy in Mouse and Human Glioblastoma Stem-Like Cell Models. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24:3409-3422. [PMID: 29599413 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Glioblastoma (GBM), a fatal brain cancer, contains a subpopulation of GBM stem-like cells (GSCs) that contribute to resistance to current therapy. Angiogenesis also plays a key role in GBM progression. Therefore, we developed a strategy to target the complex GBM microenvironment, including GSCs and tumor vasculature.Experimental Design: We evaluated the cytotoxic effects of VEFGR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) axitinib in vitro and then tested antitumor efficacy of axitinib in combination with oncolytic herpes simplex virus (oHSV) expressing antiangiogenic cytokine murine IL12 (G47Δ-mIL12) in two orthotopic GSC-derived GBM models: patient-derived recurrent MGG123 GSCs, forming vascular xenografts in immunodeficient mice; and mouse 005 GSCs, forming syngeneic tumors in immunocompetent mice.Results: GSCs form endothelial-like tubes and were sensitive to axitinib. G47Δ-mIL12 significantly improved survival, as did axitinib, while dual combinations further extended survival significantly compared with single therapies alone in both models. In MGG123 tumors, axitinib was effective only at high doses (50 mg/kg), alone and in combination with G47Δ-mIL12, and this was associated with greatly decreased vascularity, increased macrophage infiltration, extensive tumor necrosis, and PDGFR/ERK pathway inhibition. In the mouse 005 model, antiglioma activity, after single and combination therapy, was only observed in immunocompetent mice and not the T-cell-deficient athymic mice. Interestingly, immune checkpoint inhibition did not improve efficacy.Conclusions: Systemic TKI (axitinib) beneficially combines with G47Δ-mIL12 to enhance antitumor efficacy in both immunodeficient and immunocompetent orthotopic GBM models. Our results support further investigation of TKIs in combination with oHSV for GBM treatment. Clin Cancer Res; 24(14); 3409-22. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dipongkor Saha
- Molecular Neurosurgery Laboratory and the Brain Tumor Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hiroaki Wakimoto
- Molecular Neurosurgery Laboratory and the Brain Tumor Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Cole W Peters
- Molecular Neurosurgery Laboratory and the Brain Tumor Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Slawomir J Antoszczyk
- Molecular Neurosurgery Laboratory and the Brain Tumor Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Samuel D Rabkin
- Molecular Neurosurgery Laboratory and the Brain Tumor Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert L Martuza
- Molecular Neurosurgery Laboratory and the Brain Tumor Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Nandu H, Wen PY, Huang RY. Imaging in neuro-oncology. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2018; 11:1756286418759865. [PMID: 29511385 PMCID: PMC5833173 DOI: 10.1177/1756286418759865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Imaging plays several key roles in managing brain tumors, including diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response assessment. Ongoing challenges remain as new therapies emerge and there are urgent needs to find accurate and clinically feasible methods to noninvasively evaluate brain tumors before and after treatment. This review aims to provide an overview of several advanced imaging modalities including magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography (PET), including advances in new PET agents, and summarize several key areas of their applications, including improving the accuracy of diagnosis and addressing the challenging clinical problems such as evaluation of pseudoprogression and anti-angiogenic therapy, and rising challenges of imaging with immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hari Nandu
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02445, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jiang Y, Miao J, Wang D, Zhou J, Liu B, Jiao F, Liang J, Wang Y, Fan C, Zhang Q. MAP30 promotes apoptosis of U251 and U87 cells by suppressing the LGR5 and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, and enhancing Smac expression. Oncol Lett 2018; 15:5833-5840. [PMID: 29556310 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Significant antitumor activity of Momordica anti-human immunodeficiency virus protein of 30 kDa (MAP30) purified from Momordica charantia has been the subject of previous research. However, the effective mechanism of MAP30 on malignant glioma cells has not yet been clarified. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects and mechanism of MAP30 on U87 and U251 cell lines. A Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, wound healing assay and Transwell assay were used to detect the effects on U87 and U251 cells treated with different concentrations of MAP30 (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 µM) over different periods of time. Proliferation, migration and invasion of each cell line were markedly inhibited by MAP30 in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Flow cytometry and fluorescence staining demonstrated that apoptosis increased and the cell cycle was arrested in S-phase in the two investigated cell lines following MAP30 treatment. Western blot analysis demonstrated that leucine-rich-repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5) expression and key proteins in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway were apparently decreased, whereas second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase (Smac) protein expression significantly increased with MAP30 treatment in the same manner. These results suggest that MAP30 markedly induces apoptosis in U87 and U251 cell lines by suppressing LGR5 and the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, and enhancing Smac expression in a dose- and time-dependent manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yilin Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100044, P.R. China
| | - Junjie Miao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100044, P.R. China
| | - Dongliang Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100044, P.R. China
| | - Jingru Zhou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100044, P.R. China
| | - Bo Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100044, P.R. China
| | - Feng Jiao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100044, P.R. China
| | - Jiangfeng Liang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, P.R. China
| | - Yangshuo Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100044, P.R. China
| | - Cungang Fan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100044, P.R. China
| | - Qingjun Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100044, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wang C, Li Y, Chen H, Huang K, Liu X, Qiu M, Liu Y, Yang Y, Yang J. CYP4X1 Inhibition by Flavonoid CH625 Normalizes Glioma Vasculature through Reprogramming TAMs via CB2 and EGFR-STAT3 Axis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2018; 365:72-83. [PMID: 29437915 DOI: 10.1124/jpet.117.247130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are pivotal effector cells in angiogenesis. Here, we tested whether CYP4X1 inhibition in TAMs by flavonoid CH625 prolongs survival and normalizes glioma vasculature. CH625 was selected against the CYP4X1 3D model by virtual screening and showed inhibitory activity on the CYP4X1 catalytic production of 14,15-EET-EA in the M2-polarized human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (IC50 = 16.5 μM). CH625 improved survival and reduced tumor burden in the C6 and GL261 glioma intracranial and subcutaneous model. In addition, CH625 normalized vasculature (evidenced by a decrease in microvessel density and HIF-1α expression and an increase in tumor perfusion, pericyte coverage, and efficacy of temozolomide therapy) accompanied with the decreased secretion of 14,15-EET-EA, VEGF, and TGF-β in the TAMs. Furthermore, CH625 attenuated vascular abnormalization and immunosuppression induced by coimplantation of GL261 cells with CYP4X1high macrophages. In vitro TAM polarization away from the M2 phenotype by CH625 inhibited proliferation and migration of endothelial cells, enhanced pericyte migration and T cell proliferation, and decreased VEGF and TGF-β production accompanied with the downregulation of CB2 and EGFR-dependent downstream STAT3 expression. These effects were reversed by overexpression of CYP4X1 and STAT3 or exogenous addition of 14,15-EET-EA, VEGF, TGF-β, EGF, and CB2 inhibitor AM630. These results suggest that CYP4X1 inhibition in TAMs by CH625 prolongs survival and normalizes tumor vasculature in glioma via CB2 and EGFR-STAT3 axis and may serve as a novel therapeutic strategy for human glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenlong Wang
- Department of Pharmacology and Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immune-related Diseases (C.W., Y.L., K.H., X.L., M.Q., Y.L., J.Y.), Experimental Teaching Center (J.Y.), and Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology (H.C.), School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Information Analysis and Tumor Diagnosis & Treatment, South-central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China (C.W.); and Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey (Y.Y.)
| | - Ying Li
- Department of Pharmacology and Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immune-related Diseases (C.W., Y.L., K.H., X.L., M.Q., Y.L., J.Y.), Experimental Teaching Center (J.Y.), and Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology (H.C.), School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Information Analysis and Tumor Diagnosis & Treatment, South-central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China (C.W.); and Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey (Y.Y.)
| | - Honglei Chen
- Department of Pharmacology and Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immune-related Diseases (C.W., Y.L., K.H., X.L., M.Q., Y.L., J.Y.), Experimental Teaching Center (J.Y.), and Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology (H.C.), School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Information Analysis and Tumor Diagnosis & Treatment, South-central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China (C.W.); and Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey (Y.Y.)
| | - Keqing Huang
- Department of Pharmacology and Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immune-related Diseases (C.W., Y.L., K.H., X.L., M.Q., Y.L., J.Y.), Experimental Teaching Center (J.Y.), and Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology (H.C.), School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Information Analysis and Tumor Diagnosis & Treatment, South-central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China (C.W.); and Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey (Y.Y.)
| | - Xiaoxiao Liu
- Department of Pharmacology and Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immune-related Diseases (C.W., Y.L., K.H., X.L., M.Q., Y.L., J.Y.), Experimental Teaching Center (J.Y.), and Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology (H.C.), School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Information Analysis and Tumor Diagnosis & Treatment, South-central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China (C.W.); and Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey (Y.Y.)
| | - Miao Qiu
- Department of Pharmacology and Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immune-related Diseases (C.W., Y.L., K.H., X.L., M.Q., Y.L., J.Y.), Experimental Teaching Center (J.Y.), and Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology (H.C.), School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Information Analysis and Tumor Diagnosis & Treatment, South-central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China (C.W.); and Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey (Y.Y.)
| | - Yanzhuo Liu
- Department of Pharmacology and Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immune-related Diseases (C.W., Y.L., K.H., X.L., M.Q., Y.L., J.Y.), Experimental Teaching Center (J.Y.), and Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology (H.C.), School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Information Analysis and Tumor Diagnosis & Treatment, South-central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China (C.W.); and Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey (Y.Y.)
| | - Yuqing Yang
- Department of Pharmacology and Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immune-related Diseases (C.W., Y.L., K.H., X.L., M.Q., Y.L., J.Y.), Experimental Teaching Center (J.Y.), and Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology (H.C.), School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Information Analysis and Tumor Diagnosis & Treatment, South-central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China (C.W.); and Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey (Y.Y.)
| | - Jing Yang
- Department of Pharmacology and Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immune-related Diseases (C.W., Y.L., K.H., X.L., M.Q., Y.L., J.Y.), Experimental Teaching Center (J.Y.), and Department of Pathology and Pathophysiology (H.C.), School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Information Analysis and Tumor Diagnosis & Treatment, South-central University for Nationalities, Wuhan, China (C.W.); and Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey (Y.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mullen KM, Huang RY. An Update on the Approach to the Imaging of Brain Tumors. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2017; 17:53. [PMID: 28516376 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-017-0760-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Neuroimaging plays a critical role in diagnosis of brain tumors and in assessment of response to therapy. However, challenges remain, including accurately and reproducibly assessing response to therapy, defining endpoints for neuro-oncology trials, providing prognostic information, and differentiating progressive disease from post-therapeutic changes particularly in the setting of antiangiogenic and other novel therapies. RECENT FINDINGS Recent advances in the imaging of brain tumors include application of advanced MRI imaging techniques to assess tumor response to therapy and analysis of imaging features correlating to molecular markers, grade, and prognosis. This review aims to summarize recent advances in imaging as applied to current diagnostic and therapeutic neuro-oncologic challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine M Mullen
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|