1
|
de Bernardi A, Bachelot T, Larrouquère L. Long-term response to sequential anti-HER2 therapies including trastuzumab-deruxtecan in a patient with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with leptomeningeal metastases: a case report and review of the literature. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1210873. [PMID: 38269026 PMCID: PMC10806069 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1210873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The incidence of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) is increasing among breast cancer patients, but their prognosis remains dismal. Many therapeutic options are now available to treat HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) involving the central nervous system (CNS). This case report illustrates a long-lasting response of more than 2 years in a patient with HER2+ MBC with LM after sequential administration of systemic and intrathecal (IT) anti-HER2 therapies and highlights that an appropriate treatment of HER2+ LM can result in durable survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel de Bernardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Cancer Reseach Center of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Louis Larrouquère
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Cancer Reseach Center of Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shanbhag NM, Tom MC, Duncan A, Bin Sumaida A. Impact of Clinical Examination and Gamma Knife Surgery in Stage IV Breast Cancer With Brain Metastasis. Cureus 2024; 16:e51831. [PMID: 38196988 PMCID: PMC10776030 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Metastatic breast cancer often presents with significant diagnostic and treatment challenges. This case report highlights the crucial role of thorough clinical examination and history-taking in diagnosing and managing a patient with metastatic breast cancer, mainly focusing on the successful integration of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). We present a case of a 68-year-old postmenopausal woman with metastatic breast cancer, initially presenting with a primary tumour in the left breast and later developing a solitary brain metastasis (BM) in the left temporal lobe. Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and left mastectomy, the patient experienced involuntary movements in the right arm, leading to the discovery of the brain lesion. Critical to this diagnosis was a detailed clinical examination emphasising the importance of vigilant monitoring in cancer management. The patient underwent GKRS, offering a focused and less invasive treatment approach with favourable outcomes. This case underscores the value of clinical vigilance in managing complex breast cancer cases. The integration of GKRS as a targeted treatment modality for BM represents a pivotal aspect of modern oncological care, especially for patients with multiple treatment modalities. This report emphasizes the importance of clinical examination in the early detection of complications such as BM in breast cancer patients. Furthermore, it demonstrates the effectiveness of GKRS in managing such metastases, reinforcing its role as a valuable tool in the multidisciplinary treatment approach for advanced breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nandan M Shanbhag
- Oncology, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, ARE
- Internal Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, ARE
| | - Martin C Tom
- Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Albert Duncan
- Surgery, Mount St. John's Medical Center, St. John's, ATG
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang Y, Luo N, Gao Y, Wu Y, Qin X, Qi Y, Sun T, Tao R, Qi C, Liu B, Yuan S. The joint detection of CEA and ctDNA in cerebrospinal fluid: an auxiliary tool for the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastases in cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022; 149:1679-1690. [PMID: 35583828 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04053-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Leptomeningeal metastases (LMs) are highly invasive which leads to poor prognosis, but the accurate diagnosis of LM is challenging. It is necessary to investigate more advanced diagnostic methods to realize precision medicine. The main purpose of this study was to select a more effective method for the auxiliary diagnosis of LM by comparing various detection methods. The secondary purpose was to explore the value of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tumor markers (TMs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing in guiding clinical treatment. METHODS TMs in serum and CSF of patients were detected by chemiluminescence. The ctDNA of CSF and plasma were detected by the next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. RESULTS In total, 54 tumor patients participated in this study, in which 39 with LM and 15 without LM (8 with parenchymal tumor and 7 without brain metastasis). The results showed that the sensitivity and accuracy of CSF cytology isolated during the first lumbar puncture were 0.31 (95% CI 0.17-0.48) and 0.50 (95% CI 0.36-0.64), respectively. The sensitivity and accuracy of CSF_CEA were 0.71 (95% CI 0.54-0.85) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.64-0.89), which were better than those of CSF_NSE and CSF_CFRA-211. The sensitivity and accuracy of CSF_ctDNA were 0.92 (95% CI 0.79-0.98) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.80-0.97), significantly higher than that of CSF cytology (P < 0.01). The sensitivity and accuracy of CSF_CEA combined with CSF_ctDNA were 0.97 (95% CI, 0.87-1.00) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.85-0.99), which were significantly higher than the traditional methods CSF cytology (P < 0.01). For LM patients with hydrocephalus, the sensitivity of CSF ctDNA even achieved 100% (14/14). CONCLUSION CSF_CEA combined with CSF_ctDNA could be used to accurately distinguish patients with LM from those with no brain metastasis and from those with parenchymal tumors. CSF_ctDNA testing reveals a unique mutation profile for patients with LM. Dynamic detection of CSF TM and ctDNA can better predict the efficacy and reveal the cause of drug resistance to guide subsequent treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trial registration number: NCT03029065.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Wang
- Shandong Cancer Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.,Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, No.440. Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Ningning Luo
- The Medical Department, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd; Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd; The State Key Lab of Translational Medicine and Innovative Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Ye Gao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zhangqiu District People's Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Yaqing Wu
- The Medical Department, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd; Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd; The State Key Lab of Translational Medicine and Innovative Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Xueting Qin
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, No.440. Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Yingxue Qi
- The Medical Department, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd; Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd; The State Key Lab of Translational Medicine and Innovative Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Tingting Sun
- The Medical Department, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd; Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd; The State Key Lab of Translational Medicine and Innovative Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Rongjie Tao
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, No.440. Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Chuang Qi
- The Medical Department, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd; Nanjing Simcere Medical Laboratory Science Co., Ltd; The State Key Lab of Translational Medicine and Innovative Drug Development, Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Baoyan Liu
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong Academy of Occupational Health and Occupational Medicine, No. 18877 Jingshi Road, Jinan, 250062, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
| | - Shuanghu Yuan
- Shandong Cancer Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China. .,Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, No.440. Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Evolving management of HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease. J Neurooncol 2022; 157:249-269. [PMID: 35244835 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-03977-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer are at a particularly high risk of breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) and leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Improvements in systemic therapy have translated to improved survival for patients with HER2-positive BCBM and LMD. However, the optimal management of these cases is rapidly evolving and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Herein, a team of radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, neuro-oncologists, and breast surgeon created a review of the evolving management of HER2-positive BCBM and LMD. We assess the epidemiology, diagnosis, and evolving treatment options for patients with HER2-positive BCBM and LMD, as well as the ongoing prospective clinical trials enrolling these patients. The management of HER2-positive BCBM and LMD represents an increasingly common challenge that involves the coordination of local and systemic therapy. Advances in systemic therapy have resulted in an improved prognosis, and promising targeted therapies currently under prospective investigation have the potential to further benefit these patients.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ansari KI, Bhan A, Saotome M, Tyagi A, De Kumar B, Chen C, Takaku M, Jandial R. Autocrine GM-CSF signaling contributes to growth of HER2+ breast leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Cancer Res 2021; 81:4723-4735. [PMID: 34247146 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-0259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) occurs when tumor cells spread to the cerebrospinal fluid-containing leptomeninges surrounding the brain and spinal cord. LC is an ominous complication of cancer with a dire prognosis. Although any malignancy can spread to the leptomeninges, breast cancer, particularly the HER2+ subtype, is its most common origin. HER2+ breast LC (HER2+ LC) remains incurable, with few treatment options, and the molecular mechanisms underlying proliferation of HER2+ breast cancer cells in the acellular, protein, and cytokine-poor leptomeningeal environment remain elusive. Therefore, we sought to characterize signaling pathways that drive HER2+ LC development as well as those that restrict its growth to leptomeninges. Primary HER2+ LC patient-derived ("Lepto") cell lines in co-culture with various central nervous system (CNS) cell types revealed that oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPC), the largest population of dividing cells in the CNS, inhibited HER2+ LC growth in vitro and in vivo, thereby limiting the spread of HER2+ LC beyond the leptomeninges. Cytokine array-based analyses identified Lepto cell-secreted granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as an oncogenic autocrine driver of HER2+ LC growth. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based analyses revealed that the OPC-derived protein TPP1 proteolytically degrades GM-CSF, decreasing GM-CSF signaling and leading to suppression of HER2+ LC growth and limiting its spread. Lastly, intrathecal delivery of neutralizing anti-GM-CSF antibodies and a pan-Aurora kinase inhibitor (CCT137690) synergistically inhibited GM-CSF and suppressed activity of GM-CSF effectors, reducing HER2+ LC growth in vivo. Thus, OPC suppress GM-CSF-driven growth of HER2+ LC in the leptomeningeal environment, providing a potential targetable axis.
Collapse
|
6
|
Guidon AC, Burton LB, Chwalisz BK, Hillis J, Schaller TH, Amato AA, Betof Warner A, Brastianos PK, Cho TA, Clardy SL, Cohen JV, Dietrich J, Dougan M, Doughty CT, Dubey D, Gelfand JM, Guptill JT, Johnson DB, Juel VC, Kadish R, Kolb N, LeBoeuf NR, Linnoila J, Mammen AL, Martinez-Lage M, Mooradian MJ, Naidoo J, Neilan TG, Reardon DA, Rubin KM, Santomasso BD, Sullivan RJ, Wang N, Woodman K, Zubiri L, Louv WC, Reynolds KL. Consensus disease definitions for neurologic immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:e002890. [PMID: 34281989 PMCID: PMC8291304 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Expanding the US Food and Drug Administration-approved indications for immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer has resulted in therapeutic success and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Neurologic irAEs (irAE-Ns) have an incidence of 1%-12% and a high fatality rate relative to other irAEs. Lack of standardized disease definitions and accurate phenotyping leads to syndrome misclassification and impedes development of evidence-based treatments and translational research. The objective of this study was to develop consensus guidance for an approach to irAE-Ns including disease definitions and severity grading. A working group of four neurologists drafted irAE-N consensus guidance and definitions, which were reviewed by the multidisciplinary Neuro irAE Disease Definition Panel including oncologists and irAE experts. A modified Delphi consensus process was used, with two rounds of anonymous ratings by panelists and two meetings to discuss areas of controversy. Panelists rated content for usability, appropriateness and accuracy on 9-point scales in electronic surveys and provided free text comments. Aggregated survey responses were incorporated into revised definitions. Consensus was based on numeric ratings using the RAND/University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Method with prespecified definitions. 27 panelists from 15 academic medical centers voted on a total of 53 rating scales (6 general guidance, 24 central and 18 peripheral nervous system disease definition components, 3 severity criteria and 2 clinical trial adjudication statements); of these, 77% (41/53) received first round consensus. After revisions, all items received second round consensus. Consensus definitions were achieved for seven core disorders: irMeningitis, irEncephalitis, irDemyelinating disease, irVasculitis, irNeuropathy, irNeuromuscular junction disorders and irMyopathy. For each disorder, six descriptors of diagnostic components are used: disease subtype, diagnostic certainty, severity, autoantibody association, exacerbation of pre-existing disease or de novo presentation, and presence or absence of concurrent irAE(s). These disease definitions standardize irAE-N classification. Diagnostic certainty is not always directly linked to certainty to treat as an irAE-N (ie, one might treat events in the probable or possible category). Given consensus on accuracy and usability from a representative panel group, we anticipate that the definitions will be used broadly across clinical and research settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda C Guidon
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Neuromuscular Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leeann B Burton
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Neuromuscular Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bart K Chwalisz
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Neuroimmunology and Neuroinfectious Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James Hillis
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Neuroimmunology and Neuroinfectious Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Anthony A Amato
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Neuromuscular Medicine, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Allison Betof Warner
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tracey A Cho
- Department of Neurology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Stacey L Clardy
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake CIty, UT, USA
| | - Justine V Cohen
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael Dougan
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christopher T Doughty
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Neuromuscular Medicine, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Divyanshu Dubey
- Departments of Neurology and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey T Guptill
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Division of Neuromuscular Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Douglas B Johnson
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Vern C Juel
- Division of Neuromuscular Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Robert Kadish
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake CIty, UT, USA
| | - Noah Kolb
- Division of Neuromuscular Medicine, Department of Neurology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Nicole R LeBoeuf
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Cutaneous Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jenny Linnoila
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Neuroimmunology and Neuroinfectious Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew L Mammen
- Muscle Disease Unit, Laboratory of Muscle Stem Cells and Gene Regulation, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Maria Martinez-Lage
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meghan J Mooradian
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jarushka Naidoo
- Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beaumont Hospital Dublin and RCSI University of Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
- Upper Aerodigestive Division, Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center/Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tomas G Neilan
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Cardio-oncology Program, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David A Reardon
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Neuro-oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Krista M Rubin
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bianca D Santomasso
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryan J Sullivan
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nancy Wang
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karin Woodman
- Section of Cancer Neurology, Department of Neuro-Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Leyre Zubiri
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Kerry L Reynolds
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Angus L, Deger T, Jager A, Martens JWM, de Weerd V, van Heuvel I, van den Bent MJ, Sillevis Smitt PAE, Kros JM, Bindels EMJ, Heitzer E, Sleijfer S, Jongen JLM, Wilting SM. Detection of Aneuploidy in Cerebrospinal Fluid from Patients with Breast Cancer Can Improve Diagnosis of Leptomeningeal Metastases. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:2798-2806. [PMID: 33514525 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Detection of leptomeningeal metastasis is hampered by limited sensitivities of currently used techniques: MRI and cytology of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Detection of cell-free tumor DNA in CSF has been proposed as a tumor-specific candidate to detect leptomeningeal metastasis at an earlier stage. The aim of this study was to investigate mutation and aneuploidy status in CSF-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of patients with breast cancer with a clinical suspicion of leptomeningeal metastasis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN cfDNA was isolated from stored remnant CSF and analyzed by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS; n = 30) and the modified fast aneuploidy screening test-sequencing system (mFAST-SeqS; n = 121). The latter method employs selective amplification of long interspaced nuclear elements sequences that are present throughout the genome and allow for fast and cheap detection of aneuploidy. We compared these results with the gold standard to diagnose leptomeningeal metastasis: cytology. RESULTS Leptomeningeal metastasis was cytology proven in 13 of 121 patients. Low DNA yields resulted in insufficient molecular coverage of NGS for the majority of samples (success rate, 8/30). The mFAST-SeqS method, successful in 112 of 121 (93%) samples, detected genome-wide aneuploidy in 24 patients. Ten of these patients had cytology-proven leptomeningeal metastasis; 8 additional patients were either concurrently diagnosed with central nervous system metastases by radiological means or developed these soon after the lumbar puncture. The remaining six cases were suspected of leptomeningeal metastasis, but could not be confirmed by cytology or imaging. Aneuploidy was associated with development of leptomeningeal metastasis and significantly worse overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Aneuploidy in CSF-derived cfDNA may provide a promising biomarker to improve timely detection of leptomeningeal metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Angus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Teoman Deger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Vanja de Weerd
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Irene van Heuvel
- Department of Neurology, The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter A E Sillevis Smitt
- Department of Neurology, The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johan M Kros
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eric M J Bindels
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen Heitzer
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Liquid Biopsies for Early Detection of Cancer, Institute of Human Genetics, Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Stefan Sleijfer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost L M Jongen
- Department of Neurology, The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia M Wilting
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fernandes L, de Matos LV, Cardoso D, Saraiva M, Medeiros-Mirra R, Coelho A, Miranda H, Martins A. Endocrine therapy for the treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in luminal breast cancer: a comprehensive review. CNS Oncol 2020; 9:CNS65. [PMID: 33078616 PMCID: PMC7737195 DOI: 10.2217/cns-2020-0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) represents a devastating complication of advanced breast cancer (ABC), with survival of <5 months with multimodal treatment. The role of endocrine therapy (ET), due to its favorable toxicity profile and first-line indication in luminal ABC, appears promising in the setting of LMD, where symptom stabilization and quality-of-life preservation are the main goals; however, evidenced-based data are lacking. We conducted a thorough review of published evidence, aiming to investigate the role of ET in LMD treatment in luminal ABC. Twenty-one of 342 articles, evaluating 1302 patients, met inclusion criteria. ET use was rarely reported. New targeted agents show CNS activity. Research is lacking on the role of ET and targeted agents in BC-LMD treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonor Fernandes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, 1449-005 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Leonor Vasconcelos de Matos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, 1449-005 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Débora Cardoso
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, 1449-005 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Marlene Saraiva
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, 1349-019 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Renata Medeiros-Mirra
- Cardiff School of Dentistry, College of Biomedical & Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, Wales, UK
| | - Andreia Coelho
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, 1449-005 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Helena Miranda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, 1449-005 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Ana Martins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, 1449-005 Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pellerino A, Internò V, Mo F, Franchino F, Soffietti R, Rudà R. Management of Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases from Breast Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E8534. [PMID: 33198331 PMCID: PMC7698162 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21228534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of breast cancer (BC) has rapidly evolved in the last 20 years. The improvement of systemic therapy allows a remarkable control of extracranial disease. However, brain (BM) and leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are frequent complications of advanced BC and represent a challenging issue for clinicians. Some prognostic scales designed for metastatic BC have been employed to select fit patients for adequate therapy and enrollment in clinical trials. Different systemic drugs, such as targeted therapies with either monoclonal antibodies or small tyrosine kinase molecules, or modified chemotherapeutic agents are under investigation. Major aims are to improve the penetration of active drugs through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) or brain-tumor barrier (BTB), and establish the best sequence and timing of radiotherapy and systemic therapy to avoid neurocognitive impairment. Moreover, pharmacologic prevention is a new concept driven by the efficacy of targeted agents on macrometastases from specific molecular subgroups. This review aims to provide an overview of the clinical and molecular factors involved in the selection of patients for local and/or systemic therapy, as well as the results of clinical trials on advanced BC. Moreover, insight on promising therapeutic options and potential directions of future therapeutic targets against BBB and microenvironment are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Pellerino
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (F.M.); (F.F.); (R.S.); (R.R.)
| | - Valeria Internò
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy;
| | - Francesca Mo
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (F.M.); (F.F.); (R.S.); (R.R.)
| | - Federica Franchino
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (F.M.); (F.F.); (R.S.); (R.R.)
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (F.M.); (F.F.); (R.S.); (R.R.)
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (F.M.); (F.F.); (R.S.); (R.R.)
- Department of Neurology, Castelfranco Veneto and Treviso Hospital, 31100 Treviso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Figura NB, Rizk VT, Armaghani AJ, Arrington JA, Etame AB, Han HS, Czerniecki BJ, Forsyth PA, Ahmed KA. Breast leptomeningeal disease: a review of current practices and updates on management. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 177:277-294. [PMID: 31209686 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05317-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is an advanced metastatic disease presentation portending a poor prognosis with minimal treatment options. The advent and widespread use of new systemic therapies for metastatic breast cancer has improved systemic disease control and extended survival; however, as patients live longer, the rates of breast cancer LMD are increasing. METHODS In this review, a group of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, breast surgeons, and neurosurgeons specializing in treatment of breast cancer reviewed the available published literature and compiled a comprehensive review on the current state of breast cancer LMD. RESULTS We discuss the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment options (including systemic, intrathecal, surgical, and radiotherapy treatment modalities), and treatment response evaluation specific to breast cancer patients. Furthermore, we discuss the controversies within this unique clinical setting and identify potential clinical opportunities to improve upon the diagnosis, treatment, and treatment response evaluation in the management of breast LMD. CONCLUSIONS We recognize the shortcomings in our current understanding of the disease and explore the future role of genomic/molecular disease characterization, technological innovations, and ongoing clinical trials attempting to improve the prognosis for this advanced disease state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas B Figura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Victoria T Rizk
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Avan J Armaghani
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - John A Arrington
- Department of Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Arnold B Etame
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Hyo S Han
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Brian J Czerniecki
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| | - Kamran A Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|