1
|
Vacher E, Rodriguez Ruiz M, Rees JH. Management of brain tumour related epilepsy (BTRE): a narrative review and therapy recommendations. Br J Neurosurg 2025; 39:4-11. [PMID: 36694327 DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2023.2170326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Brain Tumour Related Epilepsy (BTRE) has a significant impact on Quality of Life with implications for driving, employment, and social activities. Management of BTRE is complex due to the higher incidence of drug resistance and the potential for interaction between anti-cancer therapy and anti-seizure medications (ASMs). Neurologists, neurosurgeons, oncologists, palliative care physicians and clinical nurse specialists treating these patients would benefit from up-to-date clinical guidelines. We aim to review the current literature and to outline specific recommendations for the optimal treatment of BTRE, encompassing both Primary Brain Tumours (PBT) and Brain Metastases (BM). A comprehensive search of the literature since 1995 on BTRE was carried out in PubMed, MEDLINE and EMCARE. A broad search strategy was used, and the evidence evaluated and graded based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Seizure frequency varies between 10 and 40% in patients with Brain Metastases (BM) and from 30% (high-grade gliomas) to 90% (low-grade gliomas) in patients with PBT. In patients with BM, risk factors include number of BM and melanoma histology. In patients with PBT, BTRE is more common in patients with lower grade histology, frontal and temporal tumours, presence of an IDH mutation and cortical infiltration. All patients with BTRE should be treated with ASMs. Non-enzyme inducing ASMs are recommended as first line treatment for BTRE, but up to 50% of patients with BTRE due to PBT remain resistant. There is no proven benefit for the use of prophylactic ASMs, although there are no randomised trials testing newer agents. Surgical and oncological treatments i.e. radiotherapy and chemotherapy improve BTRE. Vagus Nerve Stimulation has been used with partial success. The review highlights the relative dearth of high-quality evidence for the management of BTRE and provides a framework for further studies aiming to improve seizure control, quality of life, and indications for ASMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Vacher
- UCL Medical School, London, UK
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | | | - Jeremy H Rees
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aboubakr O, Houillier C, Alentorn A, Choquet S, Dupont S, Mokhtari K, Leclercq D, Nichelli L, Kas A, Rozenblum L, Le Garff-Tavernier M, Hoang-Xuan K, Carpentier A, Mathon B. Epilepsy in Patients With Primary CNS Lymphoma: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Prognostic Significance. Neurology 2024; 103:e209748. [PMID: 39116374 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000209748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Epilepsy is a common comorbidity of brain tumors; however, little is known about the prevalence, onset time, semiology, and risk factors of seizures in primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). Our objectives were to determine the prevalence of epilepsy in PCNSL, to identify factors associated with epilepsy, and to investigate the prognostic significance of seizures in PCNSL. METHODS We performed an observational, retrospective single-center study at a tertiary neuro-oncology center (2011-2023) including immunocompetent patients with PCNSL and no history of seizures. We collected clinical, imaging, and treatment data; seizure status over the course of PCNSL; and oncological and seizure outcome. The primary outcome was to determine the prevalence of epilepsy. Furthermore, we aimed to identify clinical, radiologic, and treatment-related factors associated with epilepsy. Univariate analyses were conducted using the χ2 test for categorical variables and unpaired t test for continuous variables. Predictors identified in the unadjusted analysis were included in backward stepwise logistic regression models. RESULTS We included 330 patients, 157 (47.6%) were male, median age at diagnosis was 68 years, and the median Karnofsky Performance Status score was 60. Eighty-three (25.2%) patients had at least 1 seizure from initial diagnosis to the last follow-up, 40 (12.1%) as the onset symptom, 16 (4.8%) during first line of treatment, 27 (8.2%) at tumor progression and 6 (1.8%) while in remission. Focal aware seizures were the most frequent seizure type, occurring in 43 (51.8%) patients. Seizure freedom under antiseizure medication was observed in 97.6% patients. Cortical contact (odds ratio [OR] 8.6, 95% CI 4.2-15.5, p < 0.001) and a higher proliferation index (OR 5.7, 95% CI 1.3-26.2, p = 0.02) were identified as independent risk factors of epilepsy. Patients with PCNSL and epilepsy had a significantly shorter progression-free survival (median progression-free survival 9.6 vs 14.1 months, adjusted hazard ratio 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.9, p = 0.03), but not a significantly shorter overall survival (17 vs 44.1 months, log-rank test, p = 0.09). DISCUSSION Epilepsy affects a quarter of patients with PCNSL, with half experiencing it at the time of initial presentation and potentially serving as a marker of disease progression. Further research is necessary to assess the broader applicability of these findings because they are subject to the constraints of a retrospective design and tertiary center setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oumaima Aboubakr
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (O.A., A.C., B.M.), Neuro-Oncology (C.H., A.A., K.H.-X.), Hematology (S.C.), Epileptology (S.D.), Neuropathology (K.M.), Neuroradiology (D.L., L.N.), Nuclear Medicine (A.K., L.R.), and Biological Hematology (M.L.G.-T.), the Paris Brain Institute (ICM) (O.A., A.A., B.M.), LIB, INSERM U1146 (A.K., L.R.), INSERM U1127 (B.M.), CNRS UMR 7225 (B.M.), and GRC 23, Brain Machine Interface (A.C), La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Caroline Houillier
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (O.A., A.C., B.M.), Neuro-Oncology (C.H., A.A., K.H.-X.), Hematology (S.C.), Epileptology (S.D.), Neuropathology (K.M.), Neuroradiology (D.L., L.N.), Nuclear Medicine (A.K., L.R.), and Biological Hematology (M.L.G.-T.), the Paris Brain Institute (ICM) (O.A., A.A., B.M.), LIB, INSERM U1146 (A.K., L.R.), INSERM U1127 (B.M.), CNRS UMR 7225 (B.M.), and GRC 23, Brain Machine Interface (A.C), La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Agusti Alentorn
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (O.A., A.C., B.M.), Neuro-Oncology (C.H., A.A., K.H.-X.), Hematology (S.C.), Epileptology (S.D.), Neuropathology (K.M.), Neuroradiology (D.L., L.N.), Nuclear Medicine (A.K., L.R.), and Biological Hematology (M.L.G.-T.), the Paris Brain Institute (ICM) (O.A., A.A., B.M.), LIB, INSERM U1146 (A.K., L.R.), INSERM U1127 (B.M.), CNRS UMR 7225 (B.M.), and GRC 23, Brain Machine Interface (A.C), La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Sylvain Choquet
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (O.A., A.C., B.M.), Neuro-Oncology (C.H., A.A., K.H.-X.), Hematology (S.C.), Epileptology (S.D.), Neuropathology (K.M.), Neuroradiology (D.L., L.N.), Nuclear Medicine (A.K., L.R.), and Biological Hematology (M.L.G.-T.), the Paris Brain Institute (ICM) (O.A., A.A., B.M.), LIB, INSERM U1146 (A.K., L.R.), INSERM U1127 (B.M.), CNRS UMR 7225 (B.M.), and GRC 23, Brain Machine Interface (A.C), La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Dupont
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (O.A., A.C., B.M.), Neuro-Oncology (C.H., A.A., K.H.-X.), Hematology (S.C.), Epileptology (S.D.), Neuropathology (K.M.), Neuroradiology (D.L., L.N.), Nuclear Medicine (A.K., L.R.), and Biological Hematology (M.L.G.-T.), the Paris Brain Institute (ICM) (O.A., A.A., B.M.), LIB, INSERM U1146 (A.K., L.R.), INSERM U1127 (B.M.), CNRS UMR 7225 (B.M.), and GRC 23, Brain Machine Interface (A.C), La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Karima Mokhtari
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (O.A., A.C., B.M.), Neuro-Oncology (C.H., A.A., K.H.-X.), Hematology (S.C.), Epileptology (S.D.), Neuropathology (K.M.), Neuroradiology (D.L., L.N.), Nuclear Medicine (A.K., L.R.), and Biological Hematology (M.L.G.-T.), the Paris Brain Institute (ICM) (O.A., A.A., B.M.), LIB, INSERM U1146 (A.K., L.R.), INSERM U1127 (B.M.), CNRS UMR 7225 (B.M.), and GRC 23, Brain Machine Interface (A.C), La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Delphine Leclercq
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (O.A., A.C., B.M.), Neuro-Oncology (C.H., A.A., K.H.-X.), Hematology (S.C.), Epileptology (S.D.), Neuropathology (K.M.), Neuroradiology (D.L., L.N.), Nuclear Medicine (A.K., L.R.), and Biological Hematology (M.L.G.-T.), the Paris Brain Institute (ICM) (O.A., A.A., B.M.), LIB, INSERM U1146 (A.K., L.R.), INSERM U1127 (B.M.), CNRS UMR 7225 (B.M.), and GRC 23, Brain Machine Interface (A.C), La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Lucia Nichelli
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (O.A., A.C., B.M.), Neuro-Oncology (C.H., A.A., K.H.-X.), Hematology (S.C.), Epileptology (S.D.), Neuropathology (K.M.), Neuroradiology (D.L., L.N.), Nuclear Medicine (A.K., L.R.), and Biological Hematology (M.L.G.-T.), the Paris Brain Institute (ICM) (O.A., A.A., B.M.), LIB, INSERM U1146 (A.K., L.R.), INSERM U1127 (B.M.), CNRS UMR 7225 (B.M.), and GRC 23, Brain Machine Interface (A.C), La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Aurelie Kas
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (O.A., A.C., B.M.), Neuro-Oncology (C.H., A.A., K.H.-X.), Hematology (S.C.), Epileptology (S.D.), Neuropathology (K.M.), Neuroradiology (D.L., L.N.), Nuclear Medicine (A.K., L.R.), and Biological Hematology (M.L.G.-T.), the Paris Brain Institute (ICM) (O.A., A.A., B.M.), LIB, INSERM U1146 (A.K., L.R.), INSERM U1127 (B.M.), CNRS UMR 7225 (B.M.), and GRC 23, Brain Machine Interface (A.C), La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laura Rozenblum
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (O.A., A.C., B.M.), Neuro-Oncology (C.H., A.A., K.H.-X.), Hematology (S.C.), Epileptology (S.D.), Neuropathology (K.M.), Neuroradiology (D.L., L.N.), Nuclear Medicine (A.K., L.R.), and Biological Hematology (M.L.G.-T.), the Paris Brain Institute (ICM) (O.A., A.A., B.M.), LIB, INSERM U1146 (A.K., L.R.), INSERM U1127 (B.M.), CNRS UMR 7225 (B.M.), and GRC 23, Brain Machine Interface (A.C), La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Magali Le Garff-Tavernier
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (O.A., A.C., B.M.), Neuro-Oncology (C.H., A.A., K.H.-X.), Hematology (S.C.), Epileptology (S.D.), Neuropathology (K.M.), Neuroradiology (D.L., L.N.), Nuclear Medicine (A.K., L.R.), and Biological Hematology (M.L.G.-T.), the Paris Brain Institute (ICM) (O.A., A.A., B.M.), LIB, INSERM U1146 (A.K., L.R.), INSERM U1127 (B.M.), CNRS UMR 7225 (B.M.), and GRC 23, Brain Machine Interface (A.C), La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Khê Hoang-Xuan
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (O.A., A.C., B.M.), Neuro-Oncology (C.H., A.A., K.H.-X.), Hematology (S.C.), Epileptology (S.D.), Neuropathology (K.M.), Neuroradiology (D.L., L.N.), Nuclear Medicine (A.K., L.R.), and Biological Hematology (M.L.G.-T.), the Paris Brain Institute (ICM) (O.A., A.A., B.M.), LIB, INSERM U1146 (A.K., L.R.), INSERM U1127 (B.M.), CNRS UMR 7225 (B.M.), and GRC 23, Brain Machine Interface (A.C), La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Carpentier
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (O.A., A.C., B.M.), Neuro-Oncology (C.H., A.A., K.H.-X.), Hematology (S.C.), Epileptology (S.D.), Neuropathology (K.M.), Neuroradiology (D.L., L.N.), Nuclear Medicine (A.K., L.R.), and Biological Hematology (M.L.G.-T.), the Paris Brain Institute (ICM) (O.A., A.A., B.M.), LIB, INSERM U1146 (A.K., L.R.), INSERM U1127 (B.M.), CNRS UMR 7225 (B.M.), and GRC 23, Brain Machine Interface (A.C), La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Bertrand Mathon
- From the Departments of Neurosurgery (O.A., A.C., B.M.), Neuro-Oncology (C.H., A.A., K.H.-X.), Hematology (S.C.), Epileptology (S.D.), Neuropathology (K.M.), Neuroradiology (D.L., L.N.), Nuclear Medicine (A.K., L.R.), and Biological Hematology (M.L.G.-T.), the Paris Brain Institute (ICM) (O.A., A.A., B.M.), LIB, INSERM U1146 (A.K., L.R.), INSERM U1127 (B.M.), CNRS UMR 7225 (B.M.), and GRC 23, Brain Machine Interface (A.C), La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zoghbi M, Moussa MJ, Dagher J, Haroun E, Qdaisat A, Singer ED, Karam YE, Yeung SCJ, Chaftari P. Brain Metastasis in the Emergency Department: Epidemiology, Presentation, Investigations, and Management. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2583. [PMID: 39061222 PMCID: PMC11274762 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16142583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2024] [Revised: 07/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) are the most prevalent type of cerebral tumor, significantly affecting survival. In adults, lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma are the primary cancers associated with BMs. Symptoms often result from brain compression, and patients may present to the emergency department (ED) with life-threatening conditions. The goal of treatment of BMs is to maximize survival and quality of life by choosing the least toxic therapy. Surgical resection followed by cavity radiation or definitive stereotactic radiosurgery remains the standard approach, depending on the patient's condition. Conversely, whole brain radiation therapy is becoming more limited to cases with multiple inoperable BMs and is less frequently used for postoperative control. BMs often signal advanced systemic disease, and patients usually present to the ED with poorly controlled symptoms, justifying hospitalization. Over half of patients with BMs in the ED are admitted, making effective ED-based management a challenge. This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and current treatment options of patients with BMs. Additionally, it provides an overview of ED management and highlights the challenges faced in this setting. An improved understanding of the reasons for potentially avoidable hospitalizations in cancer patients with BMs is needed and could help emergency physicians distinguish patients who can be safely discharged from those who require observation or hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Zoghbi
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Mohammad Jad Moussa
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jim Dagher
- Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut 1100, Lebanon
| | - Elio Haroun
- Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut 1100, Lebanon
| | - Aiham Qdaisat
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Emad D. Singer
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yara E. Karam
- Department of Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sai-Ching J. Yeung
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Patrick Chaftari
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maciel CB, Busl KM. Neuro-oncologic Emergencies. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2024; 30:845-877. [PMID: 38830073 DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000001435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Neuro-oncologic emergencies have become more frequent as cancer remains one of the leading causes of death in the United States, second only to heart disease. This article highlights key aspects of epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of acute neurologic complications in primary central nervous system malignancies and systemic cancer, following three thematic classifications: (1) complications that are anatomically or intrinsically tumor-related, (2) complications that are tumor-mediated, and (3) complications that are treatment-related. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS The main driver of mortality in patients with brain metastasis is systemic disease progression; however, intracranial hypertension, treatment-resistant seizures, and overall decline due to increased intracranial burden of disease are the main factors underlying neurologic-related deaths. Advances in the understanding of tumor-specific characteristics can better inform risk stratification of neurologic complications. Following standardized grading and management algorithms for neurotoxic syndromes related to newer immunologic therapies is paramount to achieving favorable outcomes. ESSENTIAL POINTS Neuro-oncologic emergencies span the boundaries of subspecialties in neurology and require a broad understanding of neuroimmunology, neuronal hyperexcitability, CSF flow dynamics, intracranial compliance, and neuroanatomy.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ottaviani MM, Fasinella MR, Di Rienzo A, Gladi M, di Somma LGM, Iacoangeli M, Dobran M. Analysis of prognostic factors and the role of epilepsy in neurosurgical patients with brain metastases. Surg Neurol Int 2024; 15:79. [PMID: 38628515 PMCID: PMC11021078 DOI: 10.25259/sni_735_2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most frequent brain tumors in adults. The identification of key prognostic factors is essential for choosing the therapeutic strategy tailored to each patient. Epilepsy can precede several months of other clinical presentations of BMs. This work aimed to study the impact of epilepsy and other prognostic factors on BMs patients' survival. Methods This retrospective study included 51 patients diagnosed with BMs and who underwent neurosurgery between 2010 and 2021. The impact of BM features and patient's clinical characteristics on the overall survival (OS) was analyzed through uni- and multivariate analysis. Results The average OS was 25.98 months and differed according to the histology of the primary tumor. The primary tumor localization and the presence of extracranial metastases had a statistically significant impact on the OS, and patients with single BM showed a superior OS to those with multifocal lesions. The localization of BMs in the temporal lobe correlated with the highest OS. The OS was significantly higher in patients who presented seizures in their clinical onset and in those who had better post-surgical Karnofsky performance status, no post-surgical complications, and who underwent post-surgical treatment. Conclusion Our study has highlighted prognostically favorable patient and tumor factors. Among those, a clinical onset with epileptic seizures can help identify brain metastasis hitherto silent. This could lead to immediate diagnostic-therapeutic interventions with more aggressive therapies after appropriate multidisciplinary evaluation.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kermanshahi N, Hamidi N, Weisberg J, Beg U, Dabrowski M, Padmanaban V, Betz J, Mansouri A. The Prevalence of Seizures in Brain Metastasis Patients on Anticonvulsant Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2024; 183:e613-e624. [PMID: 38199459 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastasis (BM) prognosis is incredibly poor and is often associated with considerable morbidity. Seizures are commonly present in these patients, and their biopsychosocial impact can be dangerous. The use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) as primary prophylaxis remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy of AED prophylaxis in patients with BM. METHODS MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched for articles pertinent to AED prophylaxis use in patients with BM. Patients with BM previously treated for cancer who were seizure naive at the time of inclusion were included. Data regarding patient characteristics, type of AED, prior treatments, and groups at a high risk of seizure were extracted. Seizure prevalence was obtained. RESULTS Eight studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis; 1902 total patients with BM were included, with 381 receiving antiepileptic prophylaxis, and 1521 receiving no prophylaxis. Although the odds of a seizure in the treatment group was found to be 1.158 times the odds of a seizure in the control group, the odds ratio was not statistically significant (t-statistic = 0.62, P value = 0.5543). CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference in the odds of seizure development in control groups compared to patients receiving prophylactic antiepileptic therapy. As patients with BM present with heterogeneity in tumor characteristics and receive various treatment modalities, future research is needed to identify groups that may benefit more significantly from AED prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nima Hamidi
- Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jake Weisberg
- Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Arizona, USA
| | - Usman Beg
- Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | | | - Varun Padmanaban
- Penn State Department of Neurosurgery, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Alireza Mansouri
- Penn State Department of Neurosurgery, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA; Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Newton HB, Wojkowski J. Antiepileptic Strategies for Patients with Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:389-403. [PMID: 38353859 PMCID: PMC10894758 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01182-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Seizure activity is common in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors, affecting more than 50% of cases over the course of their disease. Several mechanisms contribute to brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE), including a pro-inflammatory environment, excessive secretion of glutamate and an increase in neuronal excitatory tone, reduction of GABAergic inhibitory activity, and an increase in 2-hydroxygluturate production in isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant tumors. After a verified seizure in a brain tumor patient, the consensus is that BTRE has developed, and it is necessary to initiate an antiepileptic drug (AED). It is not recommended to initiate AED prophylaxis. Second- and third-generation AEDs are the preferred options for initiation, due to a lack of hepatic enzyme induction and reduced likelihood for drug-drug interactions, especially in regard to neoplastic treatment. The efficacy of appropriate AEDs for patients with BTRE is fairly equivalent, although some data suggests that levetiracetam may be slightly more active in suppressing seizures than other AEDs. The consensus among most Neuro-Oncology providers is to initiate levetiracetam monotherapy after a first seizure in a brain tumor patient, as long as the patient does not have any psychiatric co-morbidities. If levetiracetam is not tolerated well or is ineffective, other appropriate initial AED options for monotherapy or as an add-on anticonvulsant include lacosamide, valproic acid, briviracetam, lamotrigine, and perampanel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herbert B Newton
- Neuro-Oncology Center and Brain Tumor Institute, University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Hanna Hall 5th Floor, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| | - Jenna Wojkowski
- Neuro-Oncology Center and Brain Tumor Institute, University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Hanna Hall 5th Floor, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Avila EK, Tobochnik S, Inati SK, Koekkoek JAF, McKhann GM, Riviello JJ, Rudà R, Schiff D, Tatum WO, Templer JW, Weller M, Wen PY. Brain tumor-related epilepsy management: A Society for Neuro-oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:7-24. [PMID: 37699031 PMCID: PMC10768995 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor-related epilepsy (TRE) is a frequent and major consequence of brain tumors. Management of TRE is required throughout the course of disease and a deep understanding of diagnosis and treatment is key to improving quality of life. Gross total resection is favored from both an oncologic and epilepsy perspective. Shared mechanisms of tumor growth and epilepsy exist, and emerging data will provide better targeted therapy options. Initial treatment with antiseizure medications (ASM) in conjunction with surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy is typical. The first choice of ASM is critical to optimize seizure control and tolerability considering the effects of the tumor itself. These agents carry a potential for drug-drug interactions and therefore knowledge of mechanisms of action and interactions is needed. A review of adverse effects is necessary to guide ASM adjustments and decision-making. This review highlights the essential aspects of diagnosis and treatment of TRE with ASMs, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy while indicating areas of uncertainty. Future studies should consider the use of a standardized method of seizure tracking and incorporating seizure outcomes as a primary endpoint of tumor treatment trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward K Avila
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Steven Tobochnik
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Neurology, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sara K Inati
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Johan A F Koekkoek
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Guy M McKhann
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - James J Riviello
- Division of Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini,” University of Turin, Italy
| | - David Schiff
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - William O Tatum
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Jessica W Templer
- Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Centre, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Center, and Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Saviuk M, Sleptsova E, Redkin T, Turubanova V. Unexplained Causes of Glioma-Associated Epilepsies: A Review of Theories and an Area for Research. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5539. [PMID: 38067243 PMCID: PMC10705208 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Approximately 30% of glioma patients are able to survive beyond one year postdiagnosis. And this short time is often overshadowed by glioma-associated epilepsy. This condition severely impairs the patient's quality of life and causes great suffering. The genetic, molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying tumour development and epileptogenesis remain incompletely understood, leading to numerous unanswered questions. The various types of gliomas, namely glioblastoma, astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma, demonstrate distinct seizure susceptibility and disease progression patterns. Patterns have been identified in the presence of IDH mutations and epilepsy, with tumour location in cortical regions, particularly the frontal lobe, showing a more frequent association with seizures. Altered expression of TP53, MGMT and VIM is frequently detected in tumour cells from individuals with epilepsy associated with glioma. However, understanding the pathogenesis of these modifications poses a challenge. Moreover, hypoxic effects induced by glioma and associated with the HIF-1a factor may have a significant impact on epileptogenesis, potentially resulting in epileptiform activity within neuronal networks. We additionally hypothesise about how the tumour may affect the functioning of neuronal ion channels and contribute to disruptions in the blood-brain barrier resulting in spontaneous depolarisations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariia Saviuk
- Institute of Neurosciences, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, 23 Gagarin Ave., 603022 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia; (M.S.); (E.S.); (T.R.)
- Cell Death Investigation and Therapy Laboratory, Anatomy and Embryology Unit, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ekaterina Sleptsova
- Institute of Neurosciences, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, 23 Gagarin Ave., 603022 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia; (M.S.); (E.S.); (T.R.)
| | - Tikhon Redkin
- Institute of Neurosciences, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, 23 Gagarin Ave., 603022 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia; (M.S.); (E.S.); (T.R.)
| | - Victoria Turubanova
- Institute of Neurosciences, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, 23 Gagarin Ave., 603022 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia; (M.S.); (E.S.); (T.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tejada Solís S, Iglesias Lozano I, Meana Carballo L, Mollejo Villanueva M, Díez Valle R, González Sánchez J, Fernández Coello A, Al Ghanem R, García Duque S, Olivares Granados G, Plans Ahicart G, Hostalot Panisello C, Garcia Romero JC, Narros Giménez JL. Brain metastasis treatment guidelines: consensus by the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery Tumor Section. NEUROCIRUGIA (ENGLISH EDITION) 2023; 34:308-320. [PMID: 37832786 DOI: 10.1016/j.neucie.2023.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
Brain metastases are tumors that arise from a tumor cell originated in another organ reaching the brain through the blood. In the brain this tumor cell is capable of growing and invading neighboring tissues, such as the meninges and bone. In most patients a known tumor is present when the brain lesion is diagnosed, although it is possible that the first diagnose is the brain tumor before there is evidence of cancer elsewhere in the body. For this reason, the neurosurgeon must know the management that has shown the greatest benefit for brain metastasis patients, so treatments can be streamlined and optimized. Specifically, in this document, the following topics will be developed: selection of the cancer patient candidate for surgical resection and the role of the neurosurgeon in the multidisciplinary team, the importance of immunohistological and molecular diagnosis, surgical techniques, radiotherapy techniques, treatment updates of chemotherapy and immunotherapy and management algorithms in brain metastases. With this consensus manuscript, the tumor group of the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (GT-SENEC) exposes the most relevant neurosurgical issues and the fundamental aspects to harmonize multidisciplinary treatment, especially with the medical specialties that are treating or will treat these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Tejada Solís
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | | | - Ricardo Díez Valle
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Rajab Al Ghanem
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario de Jaén, Spain
| | - Sara García Duque
- Departamento de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yuan N, Lv ZH, Tao TY, Qian D. Influencing Factors and Nomogram for the Development of Epilepsy in Advanced Lung Cancer Patients With Brain Metastases. Biol Res Nurs 2023; 25:606-614. [PMID: 37138370 DOI: 10.1177/10998004231173425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epilepsy is a prevalent comorbidity in patients with brain metastases (BM) and could result in sudden and accidental damage, as well as increased disease burden due to its rapid onset. Foreseeing the potential for the development of epilepsy may permit timely and efficient measures. This study aimed to analyze the influencing factors of epilepsy in advanced lung cancer (ALC) patients with BM and construct a nomogram model to predict the likelihood of developing epilepsy. METHODS Socio-demographic and clinical data of ALC patients with BM were retrospectively collected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between September 2019 and June 2021. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to determine the influencing factors for epilepsy in ALC patients with BM. Based on the results of the logistic regression analysis, a nomogram was built to represent the contribution of each influencing factor in predicting the probability of epilepsy development in ALC patients with BM. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were utilized to evaluate the goodness of fit and prediction performance of the model. RESULTS The incidence of epilepsy among 138 ALC patients with BM was 29.7%. On the multivariate analysis, having a higher number of supratentorial lesions (odds ratio [OR] = 1.727; p = 0.022), hemorrhagic foci (OR = 4.922; p = .021), and a high-grade of peritumoral edema (OR = 2.524; p < .001) were independent risk factors for developing epilepsy, while undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery (OR = .327; p = .019) was an independent protective factor. The p-value of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was .535 and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was .852 (95% CI: .807-.897), suggesting the model had a good fit and exhibited strong predictive accuracy. CONCLUSION The nomogram was constructed that can predict the probability of epilepsy development for ALC patients with BM, which is helpful for healthcare professionals to identify high-risk groups early and allows for individualized interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niu Yuan
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhang-Hong Lv
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ting-Yu Tao
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Dan Qian
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cifarelli CP, Vargo JA, Sener U, Cifarelli DT, Scoville D, Dabir A. Intracranial intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT): evaluation of electrocorticography and peri-operative seizure risk. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:423-430. [PMID: 37668944 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04443-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT) for brain metastases (BMs) and primary brain tumors has emerged as an adjuvant radiation modality that allows for consolidation of care into a single anesthetic episode with surgical resection. Yet, there is a paucity of data regarding the impact that IORT may have on peri-operative and long-term seizure risk. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients receiving IORT during tumor resection was performed via registry including data regarding peri-operative anti-seizure medications and anesthetic agents. Intra-operative neuromonitoring was performed using electrocorticography (ECoG) captured before-, during-, and after-IORT then analyzed for evidence of seizure or significant baseline changes. Kaplan-Meir estimations were used for overall survival analysis relative to documented clinical seizure incidence post-IORT. RESULTS Of the 24 consecutive patients treated with IORT during tumor resection included, 18 (75%) patients were diagnosed with BMs while 6 (25%) had newly-diagnosed glioblastoma. Mean and median survival times were 487 and 372 days, respectively. Clinical seizures occurred in 3 patients post-IORT, 2 BMs patients within 9 months and 1 glioblastoma patient at 14 months. IORT time represented 9.5% of anesthetic time. ECoG recordings were available for 5 patients (4 BMs; 1 glioblastoma), with mean recording durations of 13% of the total anesthetic time and no evidence of high-frequency oscillations or seizure activity. CONCLUSIONS IORT is an option for delivery of definitive radiation in surgically resected brain tumors without increasing the peri-operative or long-term risk of seizure. ECoG data during the delivery of radiation fail to demonstrate any electrophysiological changes in response to ionizing radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, 1 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26506-9183, USA.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
| | - John A Vargo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ugur Sener
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Daniel T Cifarelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, 1 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26506-9183, USA
| | - David Scoville
- Division of Surgical Services, WVU Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Aman Dabir
- Department of Neurology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ocaña-Tienda B, Pérez-Beteta J, Villanueva-García JD, Romero-Rosales JA, Molina-García D, Suter Y, Asenjo B, Albillo D, Ortiz de Mendivil A, Pérez-Romasanta LA, González-Del Portillo E, Llorente M, Carballo N, Nagib-Raya F, Vidal-Denis M, Luque B, Reyes M, Arana E, Pérez-García VM. A comprehensive dataset of annotated brain metastasis MR images with clinical and radiomic data. Sci Data 2023; 10:208. [PMID: 37059722 PMCID: PMC10104872 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02123-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastasis (BM) is one of the main complications of many cancers, and the most frequent malignancy of the central nervous system. Imaging studies of BMs are routinely used for diagnosis of disease, treatment planning and follow-up. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has great potential to provide automated tools to assist in the management of disease. However, AI methods require large datasets for training and validation, and to date there have been just one publicly available imaging dataset of 156 BMs. This paper publishes 637 high-resolution imaging studies of 75 patients harboring 260 BM lesions, and their respective clinical data. It also includes semi-automatic segmentations of 593 BMs, including pre- and post-treatment T1-weighted cases, and a set of morphological and radiomic features for the cases segmented. This data-sharing initiative is expected to enable research into and performance evaluation of automatic BM detection, lesion segmentation, disease status evaluation and treatment planning methods for BMs, as well as the development and validation of predictive and prognostic tools with clinical applicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriz Ocaña-Tienda
- Mathematical Oncology Laboratory (MOLAB), University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.
| | - Julián Pérez-Beteta
- Mathematical Oncology Laboratory (MOLAB), University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | | | - José A Romero-Rosales
- Mathematical Oncology Laboratory (MOLAB), University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - David Molina-García
- Mathematical Oncology Laboratory (MOLAB), University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Yannick Suter
- Medical Image Analysis Group, ARTORG Research Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Beatriz Asenjo
- Radiology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - David Albillo
- Radiology Department, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Manuel Llorente
- Radiology Department, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Fátima Nagib-Raya
- Radiology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Maria Vidal-Denis
- Radiology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Belén Luque
- Mathematical Oncology Laboratory (MOLAB), University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Mauricio Reyes
- Medical Image Analysis Group, ARTORG Research Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Estanislao Arana
- Radiology Department, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Víctor M Pérez-García
- Mathematical Oncology Laboratory (MOLAB), University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Huntoon K, Musgrave N, Shaikhouni A, Elder J. Frequency of seizures in patients with metastatic brain tumors. Neurol Sci 2023:10.1007/s10072-023-06695-y. [PMID: 36808311 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-06695-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We sought to determine the influence of primary tumor histology and metastatic tumor location on the frequency of seizures among patients with brain metastases. A secondary aim was to determine if surgery reduced the occurrence and frequency of seizures. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients with cerebral metastasis at a single institution from 2006 to 2016. RESULTS Among 1949 patients identified as having had cerebral metastasis, 168 (8.6%) had documentation of one or more seizures. The incidence of seizures was highest among patients with metastases from melanoma (19.8%), followed by those with colon cancer (9.7%), renal cell carcinoma (RCC; 8.3%), and lung cancer (7.0%). Among 1581 patients with melanoma, colon cancer, RCC, non-small cell lung cancer, or breast cancer, having metastases in the frontal lobe seemed to confer the greatest risk of seizures (n = 100), followed by foci in the temporal lobe (n = 20) and elsewhere (n = 16). CONCLUSION Patients with cerebral metastasis are at increased risk for seizures. Seizure rates seem to be higher for certain primary tumors, such as melanoma, colon cancer, and RCC, and for lesions located in the frontal lobe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Huntoon
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Nicholas Musgrave
- Division of Neurological Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, 63103, USA
| | - Ammar Shaikhouni
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - James Elder
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Garcia JH, Morshed RA, Chung J, Millares Chavez MA, Sudhakar V, Saggi S, Avalos LN, Gallagher A, Young JS, Daras M, McDermott MW, Garcia PA, Chang EF, Aghi MK. Factors associated with preoperative and postoperative seizures in patients undergoing resection of brain metastases. J Neurosurg 2023; 138:19-26. [PMID: 35535842 DOI: 10.3171/2022.3.jns212285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Epileptic seizures are a common and potentially devastating complication of metastatic brain tumors. Although tumor-related seizures have been described in previous case series, most studies have focused on primary brain tumors and have not differentiated between different types of cerebral metastases. The authors analyzed a large surgical cohort of patients with brain metastases to examine risk factors associated with preoperative and postoperative seizures and to better understand the seizure risk factors of metastatic brain tumors. METHODS Patients who underwent resection of a brain metastasis at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), were retrospectively reviewed. Patients included in the study were ≥ 18 years of age, required resection of a brain metastasis, and were treated at UCSF. Primary cancers included melanoma, non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma, breast adenocarcinoma, colorectal adenocarcinoma, esophageal adenocarcinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, cervical squamous cell carcinoma, and endometrial adenocarcinoma. Patients were evaluated for primary cancer type and seizure occurrence, as well as need for use of antiepileptic drugs preoperatively, at time of discharge, and at 6 months postoperatively. Additionally, Engel classification scores were assigned to those patients who initially presented with seizures preoperatively. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to assess the association of tumor type with preoperative seizures. RESULTS Data were retrospectively analyzed for 348 consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment of brain metastases between 1998 and 2019. The cohort had a mean age of 60 years at the time of surgery and was 59% female. The mean and median follow-up durations after the date of surgery for the cohort were 22 months and 10.8 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, frontal lobe location (p = 0.05), melanoma (p = 0.02), KRAS mutation in lung carcinoma (p = 0.04), intratumoral hemorrhage (p = 0.04), and prior radiotherapy (p = 0.04) were associated with seizure presentation. Postoperative checkpoint inhibitor use (p = 0.002), prior radiotherapy (p = 0.05), older age (p = 0.002), distant CNS progression (p = 0.004), and parietal lobe tumor location (p = 0.002) were associated with seizures at 6 months postoperatively. The final multivariate model confirmed the independent effects of tumor location in the frontal lobe and presence of intratumoral hemorrhage as predictors of preoperative seizures, and checkpoint inhibitor use and parietal lobe location were identified as significant predictors of seizures at 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Within this surgical cohort of patients with brain metastases, seizures were seen in almost a quarter of patients preoperatively. Frontal lobe metastases and hemorrhagic tumors were associated with higher risk of preoperative seizures, whereas checkpoint inhibitor use and parietal lobe tumors appeared to be associated with seizures at 6 months postoperatively. Future research should focus on the effect of metastatic lesion-targeting therapeutic interventions on seizure control in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Paul A Garcia
- 2Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zheng Y, Yang Y, Ng MH, Chew AYH, Goh CP, Chua CYK, Rathakrishnan R, Ang Y, Wong ALA, Vellayappan B, Teo K, Nga VDW, Yeo TT, Lim MJR. Effect of perioperative seizures on mortality and recurrence in patients with brain metastases. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1048304. [DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1048304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveTo identify the independent risk factors for 30-day perioperative seizures, as well as to evaluate the effect of perioperative seizures on overall mortality and tumor recurrence among patients who underwent surgical resection of brain metastases.MethodsPatients who underwent surgical resection of brain metastases at our institution between 2011 and 2019 were included. 30-day perioperative seizures were defined as the presence of any preoperative or postoperative seizures diagnosed by a neurosurgeon or neurologist within 30 days of metastases resection. Independent risk factors for 30-day perioperative seizures were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression models. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression models were constructed to evaluate the effects of 30-day perioperative seizures on overall mortality and tumor recurrence. Subgroup analyses were conducted for 30-day preoperative and 30-day postoperative seizures.ResultsA total of 158 patients were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) age was 59.3 (12.0) years, and 20 (12.7%) patients had 30-day perioperative seizures. The presence of 30-day preoperative seizures (OR=41.4; 95% CI=4.76, 924; p=0.002) was an independent risk factor for 30-day postoperative seizures. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that any 30-day perioperative seizure (HR=3.25; 95% CI=1.60, 6.62; p=0.001) was independently and significantly associated with overall mortality but not tumor recurrence (HR=1.95; 95% CI=0.78, 4.91; p=0.154).ConclusionsAmong patients with resected brain metastases, the presence of any 30-day perioperative seizure was independently associated with overall mortality. This suggests that 30-day perioperative seizures may be a prognostic marker of poor outcome. Further research evaluating this association as well as the effect of perioperative antiepileptic drugs in patients with resected brain metastases may be warranted.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW A concise review of recent findings in brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE), with focus on the effect of antitumor treatment on seizure control and the management of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). RECENT FINDINGS Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation and its active metabolite d -2-hydroxyglutarate seem important contributing factors to epileptogenesis in BTRE. A beneficial effect of antitumor treatment (i.e. surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) on seizure control has mainly been demonstrated in low-grade glioma. AED prophylaxis in seizure-naïve BTRE patients is not recommended, but AED treatment should be initiated after a first seizure has occurred. Comparative efficacy randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are currently lacking, but second-generation AED levetiracetam seems the preferred choice in BTRE. Levetiracetam lacks significant drug-drug interactions, has shown favorable efficacy compared to valproic acid in BTRE, generally causes no hematological or neurocognitive functioning adverse effects, but caution should be exercised with regard to psychiatric adverse effects. Potential add-on AEDs in case of uncontrolled seizures include lacosamide, perampanel, and valproic acid. Ultimately, in the end-of-life phase when oral intake of medication is hampered, benzodiazepines via nonoral administration routes are potential alternatives. SUMMARY Management of seizures in BTRE is complex and with currently available evidence levetiracetam seems the preferred choice. Comparative efficacy RCTs in BTRE are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martin J.B. Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Johan A.F. Koekkoek
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Prevalence of seizures in brain tumor: A meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res 2022; 187:107033. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.107033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
19
|
Sánchez-Villalobos JM, Aledo-Serrano Á, Villegas-Martínez I, Shaikh MF, Alcaraz M. Epilepsy treatment in neuro-oncology: A rationale for drug choice in common clinical scenarios. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:991244. [PMID: 36278161 PMCID: PMC9583251 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.991244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Epilepsy represents a challenge in the management of patients with brain tumors. Epileptic seizures are one of the most frequent comorbidities in neuro-oncology and may be the debut symptom of a brain tumor or a complication during its evolution. Epileptogenic mechanisms of brain tumors are not yet fully elucidated, although new factors related to the underlying pathophysiological process with possible treatment implications have been described. In recent years, the development of new anti-seizure medications (ASM), with better pharmacokinetic profiles and fewer side effects, has become a paradigm shift in many clinical scenarios in neuro-oncology, being able, for instance, to adapt epilepsy treatment to specific features of each patient. This is crucial in several situations, such as patients with cognitive/psychiatric comorbidity, pregnancy, or advanced age, among others. In this narrative review, we provide a rationale for decision-making in ASM choice for neuro-oncologic patients, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each drug. In addition, according to current literature evidence, we try to answer some of the most frequent questions that arise in daily clinical practice in patients with epilepsy related to brain tumors, such as, which patients are the best candidates for ASM and when to start it, what is the best treatment option for each patient, and what are the major pitfalls to be aware of during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Manuel Sánchez-Villalobos
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Complex of Cartagena, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Cell Biology and Histology, School of Medicine, Regional Campus of International Excellence, “Campus Mare Nostrum”, IMIB-Arrixaca, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Ángel Aledo-Serrano
- Epilepsy Program, Department of Neurology, Ruber International Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- *Correspondence: Ángel Aledo-Serrano,
| | | | - Mohd Farooq Shaikh
- Neuropharmacology Research Laboratory, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Miguel Alcaraz
- Department of Radiology and Physical Medicine, School of Medicine, Regional Campus of International Excellence, “Campus Mare Nostrum”, IMIB-Arrixaca, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Aizer AA, Lamba N, Ahluwalia MS, Aldape K, Boire A, Brastianos PK, Brown PD, Camidge DR, Chiang VL, Davies MA, Hu LS, Huang RY, Kaufmann T, Kumthekar P, Lam K, Lee EQ, Lin NU, Mehta M, Parsons M, Reardon DA, Sheehan J, Soffietti R, Tawbi H, Weller M, Wen PY. Brain metastases: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management and future directions. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:1613-1646. [PMID: 35762249 PMCID: PMC9527527 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Yet, less is known about brain metastases than cancer-related entities of similar incidence. Advances in oncologic care have heightened the importance of intracranial management. Here, in this consensus review supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), we review the landscape of brain metastases with particular attention to management approaches and ongoing efforts with potential to shape future paradigms of care. Each coauthor carried an area of expertise within the field of brain metastases and initially composed, edited, or reviewed their specific subsection of interest. After each subsection was accordingly written, multiple drafts of the manuscript were circulated to the entire list of authors for group discussion and feedback. The hope is that the these consensus guidelines will accelerate progress in the understanding and management of patients with brain metastases, and highlight key areas in need of further exploration that will lead to dedicated trials and other research investigations designed to advance the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayal A Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nayan Lamba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Kenneth Aldape
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Department of Neurology, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Departments of Neuro-Oncology and Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - D Ross Camidge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Veronica L Chiang
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Priya Kumthekar
- Department of Neurology at The Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University and The Malnati Brain Tumor Institute at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Keng Lam
- Department of Neurology, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Eudocia Q Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Minesh Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Parsons
- Departments of Oncology and Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David A Reardon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wolpert F, Grossenbacher B, Moors S, Lareida A, Serra C, Akeret K, Roth P, Imbach L, Le Rhun E, Regli L, Weller M, Galovic M. Postoperative progression of brain metastasis is associated with seizures. Epilepsia 2022; 63:e138-e143. [PMID: 35892318 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Seizures in patients with brain metastases have an impact on morbidity and quality of life. The influence of tumor growth on the risk of seizures in these patients is not well defined. In this cohort study, we evaluated adult patients from the University Hospital of Zurich following resection of brain metastases from solid tumors, with or without preoperative seizures, at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was assessed for tumor progression using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. The quarterly risk of unprovoked seizures was modeled with mixed effects logistic regression. We analyzed 444 time frames in 220 patients. Progression of brain metastases was independently associated with seizures during the respective quarterly follow-up period (odds ratio = 3.9, 95% confidence interval = 1.3-11.3, p = .014). Complete resection of brain metastases was associated with a lower risk of seizures (odds ratio = .2, 95% confidence interval = .04-.7, p = .015). Postoperative progression of brain metastases quadrupled the risk of seizures; therefore, vigorous follow-up may be useful to identify tumor progression and gauge the risk of seizures. The identification of patients at high seizure risk may have implications for treatment decisions and influence aspects of daily life. Breakthrough seizures may indicate brain metastases progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Wolpert
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bettina Grossenbacher
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Selina Moors
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anna Lareida
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Carlo Serra
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kevin Akeret
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Roth
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Imbach
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Luca Regli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marian Galovic
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Le Rhun E, Guckenberger M, Smits M, Dummer R, Bachelot T, Sahm F, Galldiks N, de Azambuja E, Berghoff AS, Metellus P, Peters S, Hong YK, Winkler F, Schadendorf D, van den Bent M, Seoane J, Stahel R, Minniti G, Wesseling P, Weller M, Preusser M. EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with brain metastasis from solid tumours. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1332-1347. [PMID: 34364998 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 266] [Impact Index Per Article: 66.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Smits
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - T Bachelot
- Département de Cancérologie Médicale, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - F Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, University of Heidelberg and Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Consortium for Transnational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Hopp Children's Cancer Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - N Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - E de Azambuja
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet and L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - A S Berghoff
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - P Metellus
- Ramsay Santé, Hôpital Privé Clairval, Department of Neurosurgery, Marseille; Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INP, Neurophysiopathology Institute, Marseille, France
| | - S Peters
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Y-K Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - F Winkler
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Medical Center, Clinical Cooperation Unit, Neuro-oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - D Schadendorf
- University Hospital Essen, Department of Dermatology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - M van den Bent
- The Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Seoane
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (HUVH), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona; CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Stahel
- Department for Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - G Minniti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Siena, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - P Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/VUmc and Brain Tumour Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Laboratory for Childhood Cancer Pathology, Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Characteristics and Clinical Outcome of Breast Cancer Patients with Asymptomatic Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12102787. [PMID: 32998430 PMCID: PMC7600746 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12102787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Brain metastases (BM) have become a major challenge in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods: The aim of this analysis was to characterize patients with asymptomatic BM (n = 580) in the overall cohort of 2589 patients with BM from our Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Network Germany (BMBC) registry. Results: Compared to symptomatic patients, asymptomatic patients were slightly younger at diagnosis (median age: 55.5 vs. 57.0 years, p = 0.01), had a better performance status at diagnosis (Karnofsky index 80-100%: 68.4% vs. 57%, p < 0.001), a lower number of BM (>1 BM: 56% vs. 70%, p = 0.027), and a slightly smaller diameter of BM (median: 1.5 vs. 2.2 cm, p < 0.001). Asymptomatic patients were more likely to have extracranial metastases (86.7% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.003) but were less likely to have leptomeningeal metastasis (6.3% vs. 10.9%, p < 0.001). Asymptomatic patients underwent less intensive BM therapy but had a longer median overall survival (statistically significant for a cohort of HER2-positive patients) compared to symptomatic patients (10.4 vs. 6.9 months, p < 0.001). Conclusions: These analyses show a trend that asymptomatic patients have less severe metastatic brain disease and despite less intensive local BM therapy still have a better outcome (statistically significant for a cohort of HER2-positive patients) than patients who present with symptomatic BM, although a lead time bias of the earlier diagnosis cannot be ruled out. Our analysis is of clinical relevance in the context of potential trials examining the benefit of early detection and treatment of BM.
Collapse
|
24
|
Witteler J, Kjaer TW, Tvilsted S, Schild SE, Rades D. Pre-Treatment Seizures in Patients With 1-3 Cerebral Metastases Receiving Local Therapies Plus Whole-brain Radiotherapy. In Vivo 2020; 34:2727-2731. [PMID: 32871806 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Seizures impair patients' quality of life. The prognostic role of pre-treatment seizures in patients with 1-3 cerebral metastases receiving local therapies plus whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS In 249 patients, prevalence, risk factors and associations of pre-treatment seizures with survival were retrospectively evaluated. Age, gender, performance score, tumor type, number of lesions, extra-cerebral metastases, and time from tumor diagnosis to treatment of cerebral metastasis were analyzed for associations with seizures. These characteristics and pre-treatment seizures were also analyzed for associations with survival. RESULTS The prevalence of pre-treatment seizures was 24.1%. Trends for associations were found between seizures and gender or performance score. On multivariate analysis, age (p=0.008), performance score (p=0.004), tumor type (p<0.001) and extra-cerebral metastasis (p<0.001) were significantly associated with survival. CONCLUSION Seizures were comparably common prior to local therapies plus WBRT for cerebral metastases. No factor was found to be significantly associated with seizures, and seizures were not associated with survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaspar Witteler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Troels W Kjaer
- Neurological Department, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Soeren Tvilsted
- Research Projects and Clinical Optimization, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, U.S.A
| | - Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rades D, Witteler J, Kjaer TW, Tvilsted S, Schild SE. Pre-operative Seizures in Patients With Single Brain Metastasis Treated With Resection Plus Whole-Brain Irradiation and a Boost. In Vivo 2020; 34:2705-2709. [PMID: 32871803 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Seizures can be the initial symptom of brain metastases. This study investigated pre-treatment seizures in patients with a single lesion. PATIENTS AND METHODS Pre-operative seizures were analyzed in 104 patients with a single brain metastasis receiving resection plus whole-brain irradiation and a boost. Prevalence of seizures, risk factors and associations with survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS Thirty patients (34.6%) had seizures prior to neurosurgery. Significant associations between seizures and investigated characteristics were not found. However, age ≤61 years showed a trend (p=0.117) for increased incidence of seizures. Time from diagnosis of malignancy until neurosurgery >12 months was significantly associated with improved OS on univariate analysis (p=0.003). Trends for a positive association with OS were found for no seizures (p=0.054), female gender (p=0.066) and breast cancer (p=0.098). On multivariate analysis, time until neurosurgery >12 months was independently associated (p=0.019) with better OS, and seizures showed a trend (p=0.119) for improved OS. CONCLUSIONS Considering the high prevalence of seizures in this cohort, regular screening and monitoring of these patients appears reasonable. This applies particularly to patients aged ≤61 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jaspar Witteler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Troels W Kjaer
- Neurological Department, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Soeren Tvilsted
- Research Projects and Clinical Optimization, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jiang C, Kong Z, Zhang Y, Liu S, Liu Z, Chen W, Liu P, Liu D, Wang Y, Lyu Y, Zhao D, Wang Y, You H, Feng F, Ma W. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomic signature predicts telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation status in grade II and III gliomas. Neuroradiology 2020; 62:803-813. [PMID: 32239241 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02392-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation status is an important biomarker for the precision diagnosis and prognosis prediction of lower grade glioma (LGG). This study aimed to construct a radiomic signature to noninvasively predict the TERT promoter status in LGGs. METHODS Eighty-three local patients with pathology-confirmed LGG were retrospectively included as a training cohort, and 33 patients from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) were used as for independent validation. Three types of regions of interest (ROIs), which covered the tumor, peri-tumoral area, and tumor plus peri-tumoral area, were delineated on three-dimensional contrast-enhanced T1 (3D-CE-T1)-weighted and T2-weighted images. One hundred seven shape, first-order, and texture radiomic features from each modality under each ROI were extracted and selected through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Radiomic signatures were constructed with multiple classifiers and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The tumors were also stratified according to IDH status. RESULTS Three radiomic signatures, namely, tumoral radiomic signature, tumoral plus peri-tumoral radiomic signature, and fusion radiomic signature, were built, all of which exhibited good accuracy and balanced sensitivity and specificity. The tumoral signature displayed the best performance, with area under the ROC curves (AUC) of 0.948 (0.903-0.993) in the training cohort and 0.827 (0.667-0.988) in the validation cohort. In the IDH subgroups, the AUCs of the tumoral signature ranged from 0.750 to 0.940. CONCLUSION The MRI-based radiomic signature is reliable for noninvasive evaluation of TERT promoter mutations in LGG regardless of the IDH status. The inclusion of peri-tumoral area did not significantly improve the performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chendan Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ziren Kong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yiwei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Sirui Liu
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Zeyu Liu
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Wenlin Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Penghao Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Delin Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yaning Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuelei Lyu
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.,Department of Radiology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Dachun Zhao
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hui You
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
| | - Feng Feng
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Wenbin Ma
- Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to highlight advances in the management of seizures in brain metastases from solid tumors. RECENT FINDINGS The highest risk for seizures is in patients with melanoma and lung cancer. There is lack of data on the efficacy of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), but interactions between enzyme-inducing AEDs and anticancer agents must be avoided. Levetiracetam and valproic acid are the most appropriate drugs. Prophylaxis with AEDs for patients with brain metastases without a history of seizures is not recommended. Total resection of a brain metastasis allows complete seizure control. Seizures may represent an adverse effect of stereotactic radiosurgery or of high-dose chemotherapy. New preclinical and clinical studies should define the risk of brain metastasis in light of the new treatment options in the different tumor types. New clinical trials should be designed in patients with brain metastases in terms of treatment or prophylaxis of seizures.
Collapse
|