A Systematic Review of Minimally Invasive Procedures for Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Too Minimal, Too Fast?

Stereotactic radiosurgery for medically refractory non-lesional epilepsy: A case-based Radiosurgery Society (RSS) practice review

INTRODUCTION

Medically refractory epilepsy (MRE) occurs in about 30 % of patients with epilepsy, and the treatment options available to them have evolved over time. The classic treatment for medial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) is anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), but an initiative to find less invasive options has resulted in treatments such as neuromodulation, ablative procedures, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). SRS has been an appealing non-invasive option and has developed an increasing presence in the literature over the last few decades. This article provides an overview of SRS for MRE with two example cases, and we discuss the optimal technique as well as the advantages, alternatives, and risks of this therapeutic option.

CASES

We present two example cases of patients with MRE, who were poor candidates for invasive surgical treatment options and underwent SRS. The first case is a 65-year-old female with multiple medical comorbidities, whose seizure focus was localized to the left temporal lobe, and the second case is a 19-year-old male with Protein C deficiency and medial temporal lobe sclerosis. Both patients underwent SRS to targets within the medial temporal lobe, and both achieve significant improvements in seizure frequency and severity.

DISCUSSION

SRS has generally been shown to be inferior to ATL for seizure reduction in medically refractory mTLE. However, there are patients with epilepsy for which SRS can be considered, such as patients with medical comorbidities that make surgery high risk, patients with epileptogenic foci in eloquent cortex, patients who have failed to respond to surgical management, patients who choose not to undergo surgery, and patients with geographic constraints to epilepsy centers. Patients and their physicians should be aware that SRS is not risk-free. Patients should be counseled on the latency period and monitored for risks such as delayed cerebral edema, visual field deficits, and radiation necrosis.

Stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation of the epileptogenic zone: a potential treatment and prognostic indicator for subsequent excision surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) for drug-resistant focal epilepsy and investigate the relationship between post-RFTC remission duration and delayed excision surgery effectiveness.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 43 patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent RFTC via SEEG electrodes. After excluding three, the remaining 40 were classified into subgroups based on procedures and outcomes. Twenty-four patients (60%) underwent a secondary excision surgery. We determined the predictive value of RFTC outcome upon subsequent surgical outcome by categorizing the delayed secondary surgery outcome as success (Engel I/II) versus failure (Engel III/IV). Demographic information, epilepsy characteristics, and the duration of seizure freedom after RFTC were assessed.

RESULTS

Among 40 patients, 20% achieved Engel class I with RFTC alone, while 24 underwent delayed secondary excision surgery. Overall, 41.7% attained Engel class I, with a 66.7% success rate combining RFTC with delayed surgery. Seizure freedom duration was significantly longer in the success group (mean 4.9 months, SD = 2.7) versus the failure group (mean 1.9 months, SD = 1.1; P = 0.007). A higher proportion of RFTC-only and delayed surgical success group patients had preoperative lesional findings (p = 0.01), correlating with a longer time to seizure recurrence (p < 0.05). Transient postoperative complications occurred in 10%, resolving within a year.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that SEEG-guided RFTC is a safe and potential treatment option for patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. A prolonged duration of seizure freedom following RFTC may serve as a predictive marker for the success of subsequent excision surgery.

Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy vs. open surgery for drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: a propensity score matched retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) and traditional open surgery (OS) are effective and safe options for patients with drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (DR-mTLE). However, their superiority in seizure control and preservation of functional abilities remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of MRgLITT and OS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with DR-mTLE who underwent MRgLITT or OS at three centres between 2015 and 2023. The data on patient demographics, presurgical non-invasive evaluation, stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) implantation, memory alteration, and seizure outcomes were collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted for the comparison of seizure control and functional preservation between two surgical approaches.

RESULTS

Of the 244 individuals who met the study criteria, 33 underwent MRgLITT and 211 OS. The median (interquartile range) age at seizure onset was 22.0 (13.0) and 12.3 (10.0) years in the MRgLITT and OS groups, respectively. The first PSM, based on demographic and non-invasive information, resulted in 26 matched pairs for the primary analysis. There were no significant differences in memory preservation ( P = 0.95) or surgical outcomes ( P = 0.96) between the groups. The second PSM, based on demographics and SEEG implantation, yielded 32 matched pairs for the sensitivity analysis, showing similar results. Subset analysis of early and late MRgLITT cases revealed no statistically significant differences in the proportion of patients with memory decline ( P = 0.42) or seizure control ( P = 1.00). Patients who underwent SEEG implantation were 96% less likely to achieve seizure freedom after MRgLITT ( P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive MRgLITT is associated with memory preservation and seizure control, similar to traditional OS. MRgLITT is effective and safe for DR-mTLE and is relevant for future prospective randomized trials on dominant-side mTLE, providing practical implications for guiding neurosurgeons in the selection of surgical approaches.

Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) has emerged as a popular minimally invasive alternative to open resective surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). We sought to perform a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis to identify independent predictors of seizure outcome and complications following MRgLITT for DRE. Eleven databases were searched from January 1, 2010 to February 6, 2021 using the terms "MR-guided ablation therapy" and "epilepsy". Multivariable mixed-effects Cox and logistic regression identified predictors of time to seizure recurrence, seizure freedom, operative complications, and postoperative neurological deficits. From 8705 citations, 46 studies reporting on 450 MRgLITT DRE patients (mean age = 29.5 ± 18.1 years, 49.6% female) were included. Median postoperative seizure freedom and follow-up duration were 15.5 and 19.0 months, respectively. Overall, 240 (57.8%) of 415 patients (excluding palliative corpus callosotomy) were seizure-free at last follow-up. Generalized seizure semiology (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.78, p = .020) and nonlesional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (HR = 1.50, p = .032) independently predicted shorter time to seizure recurrence. Cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM; odds ratio [OR] = 7.97, p < .001) and mesial temporal sclerosis/atrophy (MTS/A; OR = 2.21, p = .011) were independently associated with greater odds of seizure freedom at last follow-up. Operative complications occurred in 28 (8.5%) of 330 patients and were independently associated with extratemporal ablations (OR = 5.40, p = .012) and nonlesional MRI studies (OR = 3.25, p = .017). Postoperative neurological deficits were observed in 53 (15.1%) of 352 patients and were independently predicted by hypothalamic hamartoma etiology (OR = 5.93, p = .006) and invasive electroencephalographic monitoring (OR = 4.83, p = .003). Overall, MRgLITT is particularly effective in treating patients with well-circumscribed lesional DRE, such as CCM and MTS/A, but less effective in nonlesional cases or lesional cases with a more diffuse epileptogenic network associated with generalized seizures. This study identifies independent predictors of seizure freedom and complications following MRgLITT that may help further guide patient selection.

Long-term Outcome of Seizure Control and Neurologic Performance After Limited Hippocampal Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation for Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Limited hippocampal radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) for patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy was associated with good short-term seizure control and few complications. We aimed to demonstrate the neuropsychologic outcomes and assess the prognostic factors of long-term seizure control in these patients.

METHODS

We included all patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy who underwent limited hippocampal RFTC from January 2016 to December 2020. Clinical data of age, sex, seizure control before and after operation were all corrected. Pre- and postoperative neuropsychologic function including full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ), memory quotient, and the Mini-Mental State Examination was used.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (17 female and 14 male) with a mean epilepsy duration of 22.3 years and seizure frequency of 5.7 times per month were included. The intraoperative seizure rate was 19.3%, and a higher preoperative seizure frequency (P = 0.001) and longer duration of epilepsy (P = 0.042) were associated with the occurrence of intraoperative seizures. The postoperative FSIQ scores were significantly better than preoperative scores (mean 92.1 vs. 89.7, P = 0.014). Nine patients (29%) who underwent limited hippocampal RFTC were seizure-free at 1 year of follow-up. Responders represented 58% (n = 18) of patients at 1 year. The mean follow-up period was 34.7 ± 13.3 months. Five patients remained seizure free and 13 patients are still responders at the last follow-up visits. Long-term seizure frequency was 2.32 ± 2.86 times per month.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited hippocampal RFTC is a safe stereotactic minimal invasive procedure with good neuropsychologic outcome and acceptable efficacy of seizure reduction in appropriately selected patients.

Recent advances in epilepsy surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Technological innovations in the preoperative evaluation, surgical techniques and outcome prediction in epilepsy surgery have grown exponentially over the last decade. This review highlights and emphasizes relevant updates in techniques and diagnostic tools, discussing their context within standard practice at comprehensive epilepsy centres.

RECENT FINDINGS

High-resolution structural imaging has set an unprecedented opportunity to detect previously unrecognized subtle abnormalities. Machine learning and computer science are impacting the methodologies to analyse presurgical and surgical outcome data, building more accurate prediction models to tailor treatment strategies. Robotic-assisted placement of depth electrodes has increased the safety and ability to sample epileptogenic nodes within deep structures, improving our understanding of the seizure networks in drug-resistant epilepsy. The current available minimally invasive techniques are reasonable surgical alternatives to ablate or disrupt epileptogenic regions, although their sustained efficacy is still an active area of research.

SUMMARY

Epilepsy surgery is still underutilized worldwide. Every patient who continues with seizures despite adequate trials of two well selected and tolerated antiseizure medications should be evaluated for surgical candidacy. Collaboration between academic epilepsy centres is of paramount importance to answer long-standing questions in epilepsy surgery regarding the understanding of spatio-temporal dynamics in epileptogenic networks and its impact on surgical outcomes.

Timing of referral to evaluate for epilepsy surgery: Expert Consensus Recommendations from the Surgical Therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy

Epilepsy surgery is the treatment of choice for patients with drug-resistant seizures. A timely evaluation for surgical candidacy can be life-saving for patients who are identified as appropriate surgical candidates, and may also enhance the care of nonsurgical candidates through improvement in diagnosis, optimization of therapy, and treatment of comorbidities. Yet, referral for surgical evaluations is often delayed while palliative options are pursued, with significant adverse consequences due to increased morbidity and mortality associated with intractable epilepsy. The Surgical Therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) sought to address these clinical gaps and clarify when to initiate a surgical evaluation. We conducted a Delphi consensus process with 61 epileptologists, epilepsy neurosurgeons, neurologists, neuropsychiatrists, and neuropsychologists with a median of 22 years in practice, from 28 countries in all six ILAE world regions. After three rounds of Delphi surveys, evaluating 51 unique scenarios, we reached the following Expert Consensus Recommendations: (1) Referral for a surgical evaluation should be offered to every patient with drug-resistant epilepsy (up to 70 years of age), as soon as drug resistance is ascertained, regardless of epilepsy duration, sex, socioeconomic status, seizure type, epilepsy type (including epileptic encephalopathies), localization, and comorbidities (including severe psychiatric comorbidity like psychogenic nonepileptic seizures [PNES] or substance abuse) if patients are cooperative with management; (2) A surgical referral should be considered for older patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who have no surgical contraindication, and for patients (adults and children) who are seizure-free on 1-2 antiseizure medications (ASMs) but have a brain lesion in noneloquent cortex; and (3) referral for surgery should not be offered to patients with active substance abuse who are noncooperative with management. We present the Delphi consensus results leading up to these Expert Consensus Recommendations and discuss the data supporting our conclusions. High level evidence will be required to permit creation of clinical practice guidelines.

Multiple hippocampal transection for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Multiple hippocampal transection (MHT) is a surgical technique that offers adequate seizure control with minimal perioperative morbidity. However, there is little evidence available to guide neurosurgeons in selecting this technique for use in appropriate patients. This systematic review analyzes patient-level data associated with MHT for intractable epilepsy, focusing on postoperative seizure control and memory outcomes.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant articles were identified from 3 databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase) up to August 1, 2021. Inclusion criteria were that the majority of patients had received a diagnosis of intractable epilepsy, the article was written in English, MHT was the primary procedure, and patient-level metadata were included.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine unique patients who underwent MHT were identified across 11 studies. Ten (17%) of 59 patients underwent MHT alone. Forty-three (75%) of 57 patients who had a follow-up 12 months or longer were seizure free at last follow-up. With respect to postoperative verbal memory retention, 9 of 38 (24%) patient test scores did not change, 14 (37%) decreased, and 16 (42%) increased. With respect to postoperative nonverbal memory retention, 12 of 38 (34%) patient test scores did not change, 13 (34%) decreased, and 13 (33%) increased.

CONCLUSION

There are few reported patients analyzed after MHT. Although the neurocognitive benefits of MHT are unproven, this relatively novel technique has shown promise in the management of seizures in patients with intractable epilepsy. However, structured trials assessing MHT in isolation are warranted.

Resective, Ablative and Radiosurgical Interventions for Drug Resistant Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes

Objectives: One-third of individuals with focal epilepsy do not achieve seizure freedom despite best medical therapy. Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) is the most common form of drug resistant focal epilepsy. Surgery may lead to long-term seizure remission if the epileptogenic zone can be defined and safely removed or disconnected. We compare published outcomes following open surgical techniques, radiosurgery (SRS), laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and radiofrequency ablation (RF-TC). Methods: PRISMA systematic review was performed through structured searches of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies of MTLE reporting seizure-free outcomes in ≥10 patients with ≥12 months follow-up. Due to variability in open surgical approaches, only comparative studies were included to minimize the risk of bias. Random effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate effects sizes and a pooled estimate of the probability of seizure freedom per person-year. A mixed effects linear regression model was performed to compare effect sizes between interventions. Results: From 1,801 screened articles, 41 articles were included in the quantitative analysis. Open surgery included anterior temporal lobe resection as well as transcortical and trans-sylvian selective amygdalohippocampectomy. The pooled seizure-free rate per person-year was 0.72 (95% CI 0.66-0.79) with trans-sylvian selective amygdalohippocampectomy, 0.59 (95% CI 0.53-0.65) with LITT, 0.70 (95% CI 0.64-0.77) with anterior temporal lobe resection, 0.60 (95% CI 0.49-0.73) with transcortical selective amygdalohippocampectomy, 0.38 (95% CI 0.14-1.00) with RF-TC and 0.50 (95% CI 0.34-0.73) with SRS. Follow up duration and study sizes were limited with LITT and RF-TC. A mixed-effects linear regression model suggests significant differences between interventions, with LITT, ATLR and SAH demonstrating the largest effects estimates and RF-TC the lowest. Conclusions: Overall, novel "minimally invasive" approaches are still comparatively less efficacious than open surgery. LITT shows promising seizure effectiveness, however follow-up durations are shorter for minimally invasive approaches so the durability of the outcomes cannot yet be assessed. Secondary outcome measures such as Neurological complications, neuropsychological outcome and interventional morbidity are poorly reported but are important considerations when deciding on first-line treatments.