Optimizing the Management of Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections: Consensus Guidance Using a Modified Delphi Process

Evaluation of Short Versus Long Courses of Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients With Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections

BACKGROUND

Short courses of antibiotics (7-10 days) are effective for uncomplicated gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSI). However, prior studies have been limited to small cohorts of critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of short courses of therapy compared with longer courses in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with GN-BSI.

METHODS

Propensity-matched, retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients with GN-BSI. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality or 60-day relapse. Secondary endpoints were components of the composite, 30-day relapse, cure with or without adverse drug events (ADE), and ADEs. Regression analysis was performed to identify factors predictive of the composite outcome.

RESULTS

225 patients were included in the propensity analysis, 145 in the long cohort and 80 in the short cohort. The primary outcome occurred in 3.8% of patients in the short group and 9.0% of patients in the long group (P = 0.24). There was no difference in 30-day mortality (3.8% vs 5.5%, P = 0.79), 60-day relapse (0% vs 3.4%, P = 0.23), or 30-day readmission (20% vs 22.8%, P = 0.76). ADEs were more common in the long group (47.2% vs 34.1%, OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.04-2.9), primarily attributable to diarrhea.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

In critically ill patients with GN-BSI, there were no efficacy outcome differences in patients treated with a short course of antibiotics compared with longer. However, patients in the short group were less likely to experience ADE. These findings suggest that short courses of antibiotics are effective for GN-BSI in critically ill patients.

Risk factors for positive follow-up blood cultures in critically ill adults with Gram-negative bacteraemia

Objectives

To evaluate the utility of follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) for Gram-negative bloodstream infection (BSI) in ICU patients and identify risk factors for repeat positive cultures.

Methods

This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study of critically ill adults with Gram-negative BSI between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2020. Critically ill patients with one or more blood cultures positive for a Gram-negative organism were included. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed with an alpha of 0.05.

Results

A total of 148 critically ill patients with Gram-negative BSI were included, with 42 patients (28.4%) having one or more positive FUBCs. The majority (66.2%) were admitted to a medical ICU. The most common organisms isolated were Escherichia coli (n = 56, 37.8%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 26, 17.6%). Significant patient risk factors associated with a positive FUBC on univariate regression included: MDR organisms, immunocompromised status, fever, vasopressor use at time of FUBC, lack of source control attainment, and higher quick Pitt bacteraemia score. Multivariable penalized logistic regression indicated that lack of source control containment and less time from index to FUBC remained significantly associated with repeat positive FUBC.

Conclusions

This is the first study to investigate the use of FUBC for Gram-negative BSI in exclusively ICU patients. Risk factors for repeat positive FUBC in this population include lack of source control and less time between index and FUBC. Prospective studies are needed to fully elucidate the role of FUBCs in critically ill patients with Gram-negative BSI.

Treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes the latest information in the management of bloodstream infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (MDRGNB) in critically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The prevalence of bloodstream infections due to MDRGNB is high, and they pose a significant risk in critically ill patients. Recently, novel antimicrobial agents, including new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol, have been introduced for treating these infections. Concurrently, updated guidelines have been issued to aid in treatment decisions. Prompt diagnosis and identification of resistance patterns are crucial for initiating effective antibiotic therapy. Current studies, especially with observational design, and with limited sample sizes and patients with bacteremia, suggest that the use of these new antibiotics is associated with improved outcomes in critically ill patients with MDRGNB bloodstream infections.

SUMMARY

For critically ill patients with bloodstream infections caused by MDRGNB, the use of newly developed antibiotics is recommended based on limited observational evidence. Further randomized clinical trials are necessary to determine the most effective antimicrobial therapies among the available options.

Antibiotic Treatment of Infections Caused by AmpC-Producing Enterobacterales

AmpC enzymes are a class of beta-lactamases produced by Gram-negative bacteria, including several Enterobacterales. When produced in sufficient amounts, AmpCs can hydrolyze third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs) and piperacillin/tazobactam, causing resistance. In Enterobacterales, the AmpC gene can be chromosomal- or plasmid-encoded. Some species, particularly Enterobacter cloacae complex, Klebsiella aerogenes, and Citrobacter freundii, harbor an inducible chromosomal AmpC gene. The expression of this gene can be derepressed during treatment with a beta-lactam, leading to AmpC overproduction and the consequent emergence of resistance to 3GCs and piperacillin/tazobactam during treatment. Because of this phenomenon, the use of carbapenems or cefepime is considered a safer option when treating these pathogens. However, many areas of uncertainty persist, including the risk of derepression related to each beta-lactam; the role of piperacillin/tazobactam compared to cefepime; the best option for severe or difficult-to-treat cases, such as high-inoculum infections (e.g., ventilator-associated pneumonia and undrainable abscesses); the role of de-escalation once clinical stability is obtained; and the best treatment for species with a lower risk of derepression during treatment (e.g., Serratia marcescens and Morganella morganii). The aim of this review is to collate the most relevant information about the microbiological properties of and therapeutic approach to AmpC-producing Enterobacterales in order to inform daily clinical practice.

Diagnostic and therapeutic yield of imaging studies in Polymicrobial and Monomicrobial Gram-negative bloodstream infections - a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Appropriate antimicrobial therapy and surgical drainage, improve survival in patients with Gram negative bloodstream infections (BSI). Data about the yield of imaging studies in polymicrobial BSI is sparse. The aim of the study was to assess the need for imaging studies and surgical drainage among patients with polymicrobial compared to monomicrobial BSI.

RESULTS

In a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with Gram negative BSI, 135 patients with monomicrobial BSI were compared to 82 with polymicrobial BSI. Imaging studies were performed in 56.3 % of patients with monomicrobial BSI and in 50 % of polymicrobial BSI (p=0.4), surgical drainage was performed in 20.1 % of patients with monomicrobial BSI and 27.2 % of polymicrobial BSI (p=0.25). Surgical drainage was performed in 26.2 % of patients who survived vs. 11.8 % of patients who died (p=0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in the diagnostic approach to monomicrobial and polymicrobial Gram-negative BSI. Surgical drainage is associated with decreased mortality.

Short Versus Long Antibiotic Duration in Streptococcus pneumoniae Bacteremia

Background

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a common pathogen associated with bloodstream infections, respiratory infections, peritonitis, infective endocarditis, and meningitis. Literature assessing duration of antibiotic therapy for a S pneumoniae bacteremia secondary to common infection is scarce, leading to variability in practice. Therefore, this study evaluated the effectiveness of short (5-10 days) versus long (11-16 days) antibiotic durations for S pneumoniae bacteremia.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center cohort study assessed hospitalized patients with S pneumoniae-positive blood cultures, who received active antibiotics within 48 hours of first positive blood culture collection and achieved clinical stability by day 10 of the first positive blood culture collection. Exclusion criteria included treatment duration <5 or >16 days, death before completion of 10 days of therapy, polymicrobial bloodstream infection, and invasive infection. Rates of clinical failure (composite of 30-day hospital readmission, bacteremia recurrence, and mortality) were compared between the groups.

Results

A total of 162 patients were included, with 51 patients in the short- and 111 patients in the long-duration group. Pneumonia was the suspected source of bacteremia in 90.1% of patients. Rates of clinical failure were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Patients received a median antibiotic course of 7 days in the short group compared to 14 days in the long group; however, there was no significant difference observed in the median hospital length of stay, median intensive care unit length of stay, or rate of Clostridioides difficile infection.

Conclusions

Shorter antibiotic courses may be appropriate in patients with S pneumoniae bacteremia secondary to community-acquired pneumonia.

Ceftriaxone Versus Cefazolin Susceptibility as a Surrogate Marker for Cefpodoxime Susceptibility in Enterobacterales

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute stated that cefpodoxime susceptibility among Enterobacterales can be inferred from cefazolin, but this may overcall cefpodoxime resistance. We report a categorical agreement rate of 64% for cefazolin and 97% for ceftriaxone with cefpodoxime (P = .0001). Ceftriaxone appears to be a more useful cefpodoxime surrogate.

Fever and infections in surgical intensive care: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document

The evaluation and workup of fever and the use of antibiotics to treat infections is part of daily practice in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Fever can be infectious or non-infectious; it is important to distinguish between the two entities wherever possible. The evidence is growing for shortening the duration of antibiotic treatment of common infections. The purpose of this clinical consensus document, created by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee, is to synthesize the available evidence, and to provide practical recommendations. We discuss the evaluation of fever, the indications to obtain cultures including urine, blood, and respiratory specimens for diagnosis of infections, the use of procalcitonin, and the decision to initiate empiric antibiotics. We then describe the treatment of common infections, specifically ventilator-associated pneumonia, catheter-associated urinary infection, catheter-related bloodstream infection, bacteremia, surgical site infection, intra-abdominal infection, ventriculitis, and necrotizing soft tissue infection.

Short versus prolonged duration of therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The optimal duration of therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection (PSA-BSI) is unknown, with prolonged therapy frequently favored due to severity of infection, patient complexity, risk of multi-drug resistance, and high mortality. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with head-to-head comparison of short versus prolonged therapy for PSA-BSI. A comprehensive search including Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus was performed. We pooled risk ratios using DerSimonian-Laird random effects model and performed subgroup analysis of outcomes including all-cause mortality, recurrent infection, and composite of these outcomes among patients receiving short versus prolonged therapy for PSA-BSI. Heterogeneity was assessed by the I2-index. Risk of bias for cohort studies was assessed using ROBINS-I tool. Of the 908 identified studies, six were included in the systematic review and five studies with head-to-head comparison of treatment duration were assessed in the meta-analysis, totalling 1746 patients. No significant difference in propensity score-weighted composite outcome (30-day all-cause mortality or recurrent infection) was noted between patients receiving short or prolonged therapy, with a pooled RR risk ratio of 0.80 (95% CI confidence interval 0.51-1.25, P=0.32; I2 = 0%). Additionally, duration of therapy did not impact individual outcomes of 30-day all-cause mortality or recurrent/persistent infection. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that short duration of antimicrobial therapy may have similar efficacy to prolonged treatment for PSA-BSI. Future randomized trials will be necessary to definitively determine optimal management of PSA bacteraemia.

Real-World Effectiveness of Intravenous and Oral Antibiotic Stepdown Strategies for Gram-Negative Complicated Urinary Tract Infection With Bacteremia

Background

Robust data are lacking regarding the optimal route, duration, and antibiotic choice for gram-negative bloodstream infection from a complicated urinary tract infection source (GN-BSI/cUTI).

Methods

In this multicenter observational cohort study, we simulated a 4-arm registry trial using a causal inference method to compare effectiveness of the following regimens for GN-BSI/cUTI: complete course of an intravenous β-lactam (IVBL) or oral stepdown therapy within 7 days using fluoroquinolones (FQs), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), or high-bioavailability β-lactams (HBBLs). Adults treated between January 2016 and December 2022 for Escherichia coli or Klebsiella species GN-BSI/cUTI were included. Propensity weighting was used to balance characteristics between groups. The 60-day recurrence was compared using a multinomial Cox proportional hazards model with probability of treatment weighting.

Results

Of 2571 patients screened, 759 (30%) were included. Characteristics were similar between groups. Compared with IVBLs, we did not observe a difference in effectiveness for FQs (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.09 [95% confidence interval, .49-2.43]) or TMP-SMX (1.44 [.54-3.87]), and the effectiveness of TMP-SMX/FQ appeared to be optimal at durations of >10 days. HBBLs were associated with nearly 4-fold higher risk of recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.83 [95% confidence interval, 1.76-8.33]), which was not mitigated by longer treatment durations. Most HBBLs (67%) were not optimally dosed for bacteremia. Results were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

These real-world data suggest that oral stepdown therapy with FQs or TMP-SMX have similar effectiveness as IVBLs. HBBLs were associated with higher recurrence rates, but dosing was suboptimal. Further data are needed to define optimal dosing and duration to mitigate treatment failures.

Persistence of Detectable Pathogens by Culture-Independent Systems (T2 Magnetic Resonance) in Patients With Bloodstream Infection: Prognostic Role and Possible Clinical Implications

BACKGROUND

Persistent Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia is associated with metastatic infection and adverse outcomes, whereas gram-negative bacteremia is normally transient and shorter course therapy is increasingly advocated for affected patients. Whether the prolonged detection of pathogen DNA in blood by culture-independent systems could have prognostic value and guide management decisions is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, prospective, observational study on 102 patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) to compare time to bloodstream clearance according to T2 magnetic resonance and blood cultures over a 4-day follow-up. We also explored the association between duration of detectable pathogens according to T2 magnetic resonance (magnetic resonance-DNAemia [MR-DNAemia]) and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Time to bloodstream clearance according to T2 magnetic resonance was significantly longer than blood culture clearance (HR, .54; 95% CI, .39-.75) and did not differ according to the causative pathogen (P = .5). Each additional day of MR-DNAemia increased the odds of persistent infection (defined as metastatic infection or delayed source control) both in the overall population (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.45-2.70) and in S. aureus (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.12-3.29) and gram-negative bacteremia (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.35-3.60). MR-DNAemia duration was also associated with no improvement in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at day 7 from infection onset (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.21-2.56).

CONCLUSIONS

T2 magnetic resonance may help diagnose BSI in patients on antimicrobials with negative blood cultures as well as to identify patients with metastatic infection, source control failure, or adverse short-term outcome. Future studies may inform its usefulness within the setting of antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Oral β-Lactams, Fluoroquinolones, or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole for Definitive Treatment of Uncomplicated Escherichia coli or Klebsiella Species Bacteremia From a Urinary Tract Source

Background

Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are effective for oral step-down therapy for gram-negative bloodstream infections but are associated with unfavorable toxic effects. Robust data are lacking for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and high-bioavailability β-lactams (HBBLs).

Methods

In this multicenter observational cohort study, we simulated a 3-arm registry trial using causal inference methods to compare the effectiveness of FQs, TMP-SMX, or HBBLs for gram-negative bloodstream infections oral step-down therapy. The study included adults treated between January 2016 and December 2022 for uncomplicated Escherichia coli or Klebsiella species bacteremia of urinary tract origin who were who were transitioned to an oral regimen after ≤4 days of effective intravenous antibiotics. Propensity weighting was used to balance characteristics between groups. 60-day recurrence was compared using a multinomial Cox proportional hazards model with probability of treatment weighting.

Results

Of 2571 patients screened, 648 (25%) were included. Their median age (interquartile range) was 67 (45-78) years, and only 103 (16%) were male. Characteristics were well balanced between groups. Compared with FQs, TMP-SMX had similar effectiveness (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.91 [95% confidence interval, .30-2.78]), and HBBLs had a higher risk of recurrence (2.19 [.95-5.01]), although this difference was not statistically significant. Most HBBLs (70%) were not optimally dosed for bacteremia. A total antibiotic duration ≤8 days was associated with a higher recurrence rate in select patients with risk factors for failure.

Conclusions

FQs and TMP-SMX had similar effectiveness in this real-world data set. HBBLs were associated with higher recurrence rates but suboptimal dosing may have contributed. Further studies are needed to define optimal BL dosing and duration to mitigate treatment failures.

Transition to Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Hospitalized Adults With Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections

Importance

Management of gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSIs) with oral antibiotics is highly variable.

Objective

To examine the transition from intravenous (IV) to oral antibiotics, including selection, timing, and associated clinical and microbial characteristics, among hospitalized patients with GN-BSIs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 4581 hospitalized adults with GN-BSIs at 24 US hospitals between January 1 and December 31, 2019. Patients were excluded if they died within 72 hours. Patients were excluded from the oral therapy group if transition occurred after day 7. Statistical analysis was conducted from July 2022 to October 2023.

Exposures

Administration of antibiotics for GN-BSIs.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Baseline characteristics and clinical parameters reflecting severity of illness were evaluated in groups receiving oral and IV therapy. The prevalence of transition from IV to oral antibiotics by day 7, median day of transition, sources of infection, and oral antibiotic selection were assessed.

Results

Of a total of 4581 episodes with GN-BSIs (median age, 67 years [IQR, 55-77 years]; 2389 men [52.2%]), 1969 patients (43.0%) receiving IV antibiotics were transitioned to oral antibiotics by day 7. Patients maintained on IV therapy were more likely than those transitioned to oral therapy to be immunosuppressed (833 of 2612 [31.9%] vs 485 of 1969 [24.6%]; P < .001), require intensive care unit admission (1033 of 2612 [39.5%] vs 334 of 1969 [17.0%]; P < .001), have fever or hypotension as of day 5 (423 of 2612 [16.2%] vs 49 of 1969 [2.5%]; P < .001), require kidney replacement therapy (280 of 2612 [10.7%] vs 63 of 1969 [3.2%]; P < .001), and less likely to have source control within 7 days (1852 of 2612 [70.9%] vs 1577 of 1969 [80.1%]; P < .001). Transitioning patients from IV to oral therapy by day 7 was highly variable across hospitals, ranging from 25.8% (66 of 256) to 65.9% (27 of 41). A total of 4109 patients (89.7%) achieved clinical stability within 5 days. For the 3429 episodes (74.9%) with successful source control by day 7, the median day of source control was day 2 (IQR, 1-3 days) for the oral group and day 2 (IQR, 1-4 days) for the IV group (P < .001). Common infection sources among patients administered oral therapy were the urinary tract (1277 of 1969 [64.9%]), hepatobiliary (239 of 1969 [12.1%]), and intra-abdominal (194 of 1969 [9.9%]). The median day of oral transition was 5 (IQR, 4-6 days). Total duration of antibiotic treatment was significantly shorter among the oral group than the IV group (median, 11 days [IQR, 9-14 days] vs median, 13 days [IQR, 8-16 days]; P < .001]. Fluoroquinolones (62.2% [1224 of 1969]), followed by β-lactams (28.3% [558 of 1969]) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (11.5% [227 of 1969]), were the most commonly prescribed oral antibiotics.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of 4581 episodes of GN-BSIs, transition to oral antibiotic therapy by day 7 occurred in fewer than half of episodes, principally with fluoroquinolones, although this practice varied significantly between hospitals. There may have been additional opportunities for earlier and more frequent oral antibiotic transitions because most patients demonstrated clinical stability by day 5.

Safety of early oral ambulatory treatment of adult patients with bloodstream infections discharged from the emergency department

This study evaluates the safety of early oral ambulatory treatment of adult patients diagnosed with bacteremia after their discharge from the emergency department. A cohort of 206 febrile ambulatory patients was assessed. Bacteremic low-risk patients were recommended an oral treatment and were compared with matched febrile non-bacteremic outpatients. Rates of 14-day mortality and unplanned re-consultations were similar and below 5% in both cohorts, highlighting the safety of oral therapy of low-risk bacteremia, even from its onset.

Infectious Diseases Consultation Associated With Reduced Mortality in Gram-Negative Bacteremia

Gram-negative bacteremia (GN-BSI) can cause significant morbidity and mortality, but the benefit of infectious diseases consultation (IDC) is not well defined. A 24-site observational cohort study of unique hospitalized patients with 4861 GN-BSI episodes demonstrated a 40% decreased risk of 30-day mortality in patients with IDC compared to those without IDC.

Evaluating antimicrobial duration for Gram-negative bacteremia in patients with neutropenia due to hematologic malignancy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

In the management of Gram-negative bloodstream infection (GN-BSI), short antimicrobial courses have been increasingly demonstrated to be non-inferior to prolonged therapy, with lower risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and emergence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) organisms. However, immunocompromised hosts were excluded from these studies. We investigated outcomes of short (≤10 days), intermediate (11-14 days), and prolonged (≥15 days) antimicrobial durations for GN-BSI in neutropenic patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on neutropenic patients with monomicrobial GN-BSI between 2018 and 2022. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and microbiologic relapse within 90 days after therapy completion. The secondary outcome was a composite of 90-day CDI and development of MDR-GN bacteria. Cox regression analysis with propensity score (PS) adjustment was used to compare outcomes between the three groups.

RESULTS

A total of 206 patients were classified into short (n = 67), intermediate (n = 81), or prolonged (n = 58) duration. Neutropenia was predominantly secondary to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (48%) or hematologic malignancy (35%). The primary sources of infection included intra-abdominal (51%), vascular catheter (27%), and urinary (8%). Most patients received definitive therapy with cefepime or carbapenem. No significant difference in the primary composite endpoint was observed for intermediate versus short (PS-adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.89; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.39-2.03) or prolonged versus short therapy (PS-aHR 1.20; 95% CI 0.52-2.74). There was no significant difference in the secondary composite endpoint of CDI or MDR-GN emergence.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that short antimicrobial courses had comparable 90-day outcomes as intermediate and prolonged regimens for GN-BSI among immunocompromised patients with neutropenia.

Outcomes of high-dose oral beta-lactam definitive therapy compared to fluoroquinolone or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole oral therapy for bacteremia secondary to a urinary tract infection

Objective

Compare outcomes of patients receiving high-dose oral beta-lactam versus standard oral therapy for Enterobacterales bacteremia from a urinary tract infection (UTI).

Design

Retrospective, multicenter, observational cohort.

Setting

Three Michigan community teaching hospitals.

Patients

Adult patients admitted between February 1, 2020, and October 1, 2022, with gram-negative bacteremia from a urinary source were evaluated. Patients receiving active empiric intravenous (IV) antibiotics and transitioned to appropriately dosed oral cephalexin, amoxicillin, fluoroquinolone (FQ), or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) were included. Patients receiving less than 72 hours of oral therapy, diagnosed with renal abscess, lobar nephronia, or expired during admission were excluded.

Methods

Standard oral therapy was defined as FQ or TMP/SMX. The primary outcome compared the composite of recurrent bacteremia or mortality within 30 days of therapy between groups. Secondary outcomes compared recurrent UTI, emergency department or hospital readmission, and Clostridioides difficile within 30 days.

Results

194 patients were included (beta-lactam, n = 75 vs standard therapy, n =119). Patients in both groups were treated for a median of 11 days, with 4 days IV and 7 days oral therapy. There was no difference in the primary outcome between groups (beta-lactam 1.3% vs standard therapy 1.7%, OR 1.27 [95% CI 0.11-14.2]). No patients experienced C. difficile in either group (p = 1.0). Infectious disease consultation was independently associated with standard therapy prescribing (OR 4.4 [95% CI 2.24-8.26]).

Conclusion

High-dose oral beta-lactams were as safe and effective as oral FQ or TMP/SMX for the treatment of bacteremia from a urinary source. Most patients received 8-10 days of therapy in both groups.

Defining the Optimal Duration of Therapy for Hospitalized Patients With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections and Associated Bacteremia

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available to guide effective antibiotic durations for hospitalized patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs).

METHODS

We conducted an observational study of patients ≥18 years at 24 US hospitals to identify the optimal treatment duration for patients with cUTI. To increase the likelihood patients experienced true infection, eligibility was limited to those with associated bacteremia. Propensity scores were generated for an inverse probability of treatment weighted analysis. The primary outcome was recurrent infection with the same species ≤30 days of completing therapy.

RESULTS

1099 patients met eligibility criteria and received 7 (n = 265), 10 (n = 382), or 14 (n = 452) days of therapy. There was no difference in the odds of recurrent infection for patients receiving 10 days and those receiving 14 days of therapy (aOR: .99; 95% CI: .52-1.87). Increased odds of recurrence was observed in patients receiving 7 days versus 14 days of treatment (aOR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.40-4.60). When limiting the 7-day versus 14-day analysis to the 627 patients who remained on intravenous beta-lactam therapy or were transitioned to highly bioavailable oral agents, differences in outcomes no longer persisted (aOR: .76; 95% CI: .38-1.52). Of 76 patients with recurrent infections, 2 (11%), 2 (10%), and 10 (36%) in the 7-, 10-, and 14-day groups, respectively, had drug-resistant infections (P = .10).

CONCLUSIONS

Seven days of antibiotics appears effective for hospitalized patients with cUTI when antibiotics with comparable intravenous and oral bioavailability are administered; 10 days may be needed for all other patients.

Risk Factors for Bloodstream Infections Due to ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Proteus mirabilis

(1) Background: Risk factors for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) infections could vary geographically. The purpose of this study was to identify local risk factors for ESBL production in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia. (2) Methods: This retrospective observational study included adult patients admitted from January 2019 to July 2021 and had positive blood cultures for E. coli, K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, and P. mirabilis. Patients with ESBL infection were matched to a non-ESBL-producing infection with the same organism. (3) Results: A total of 150 patients were included: 50 in the ESBL group and 100 in the non-ESBL group. Patients in the ESBL group had a longer length of stay (11 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001), but not increased mortality (14% vs. 15%, p = 0.87) Multivariate analysis identified the receipt of >1 antibiotic in the last 90 days as a risk factor for ESBL infection (OR = 3.448, 95% CI = 1.494-7.957; p = 0.004); (4) Conclusions: Recent antimicrobial use was identified as an independent risk factors for ESBL-producing Enterobacterales infections. Knowledge of this risk may improve empirical therapy and reduce inappropriate use.

Antimicrobial Therapy Duration for Bloodstream Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Ideal therapy duration for Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) bloodstream infections (BSI) is not defined, especially in the context of carbapenem resistance. In this study, we compared short- (≤7 days) and long-term (>7 days) antimicrobial therapy duration for these infections. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study in two tertiary-care hospitals in Porto Alegre, Brazil, from 2013 to 2019. Eligible patients aged ≥18 years were included and excluded for the following criteria: polymicrobial infections, treatment with non-susceptible antibiotics, complicated infections, or early mortality (<8 days of active antimicrobial therapy). The 30-day mortality risk was evaluated using a Cox regression model. Results: We included 237 BSI episodes, 51.5% caused by ABC and 48.5% by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Short-term therapy was not associated with 30-day mortality, adjusted hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.47–2.20, p = 0.98, when adjusted for Pitt score (p = 0.02), Charlson Comorbidity Index score (p < 0.01), and carbapenem resistance (p < 0.01). Among patients who survived, short-term therapy was associated with shorter hospital stay (p < 0.01). Results were maintained in the subgroups of BSI caused by carbapenem-resistant bacteria (p = 0.76), ABC (p = 0.61), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (p = 0.39). Conclusions: Long-term therapies for non-complicated Pseudomonas aeruginosa and ABC BSI were not superior to short-term therapy for 30-day mortality.

Association between follow-up blood cultures for gram-negative bacilli bacteremia and length of hospital stay and duration of antibiotic treatment: A propensity score-matched cohort study

OBJECTIVE

It remains unclear whether a follow-up blood culture (FUBC) for gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bacteremia should be routinely or selectively performed. To evaluate the value of the practice, we analyzed the association between current FUBC practices and length of stay, antibiotic treatment duration, and in-hospital mortality.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The study was conducted in 4 acute-care hospitals in New York City.

PATIENTS

The study included hospitalized adults with GNB bacteremia between 2017 and 2018.

METHODS

An FUBC was defined as a blood culture performed between 24 hours and 7 days after an initial blood culture positive for GNB. Using propensity scores for FUBCs performed, patients were matched 1:1 for outcome comparison.

RESULTS

In total, 376 hospitalized adults with GNB bacteremia met eligibility criteria. Among them, FUBCs were performed in 271 patients (72%). After propensity score matching, we analyzed 87 pairs of patients with and without an FUBC to compare outcomes. The median length of stay was longer among patients with FUBCs than patients without FUBCs (9 days vs 7 days; P = .017). The median duration of antibiotic treatment was also longer among patients with FUBCs than patients without FUBCs (8 vs 6 days; P = .007). No statistically significant difference was observed in in-hospital mortality between patients with and without an FUBC (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-1.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Current FUBC practices for GNB bacteremia were associated with prolonged length of stay and duration of antibiotic treatment. Further data to better inform selectivity criteria for FUBCs in GNB bacteremia are needed.

Oral β-lactams vs fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for step-down therapy for Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia

PURPOSE

To compare rates of treatment failure for patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Proteus mirabilis who received oral step-down antibiotic therapy with either a fluoroquinolone (FQ) or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) to rates for those who received an oral β-lactam (BL).

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter, cohort study included 397 unique adult hospitalized patients with a BSI due to E. coli, K. pneumoniae, or P. mirabilis at 6 hospitals in central Texas between July 11, 2016, and July 11, 2018. The primary outcome was a composite of treatment failure comprising 30-day readmission due to recurrence, 30-day all-cause mortality, and change in oral antibiotic. Secondary outcomes included 90-day development of Clostridioides difficile infection, 90-day colonization with a multidrug-resistant organism, 90-day all-cause readmission, hospital length of stay, and the individual components of the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 397 patients included, 200 received oral step-down therapy with a BL while 197 received an FQ or SXT. Most patients had an infection due to E. coli (82.8%) and a urinary source of infection (85%). Median total duration of therapy was 14 days in both groups. No difference in treatment failure was identified between the groups treated with a BL and FQ/SXT (7% vs 5.8%, P = 0.561). Median hospital length of stay was the only secondary endpoint in which there was an observed difference (6 vs 5 days, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

We observed no difference in treatment failure rates for patients receiving an oral BL compared to an oral FQ or SXT for step-down therapy of BSIs due to E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. mirabilis.

Impact of specialty on the self-reported practice of using oral antibiotic therapy for definitive treatment of bloodstream infections

Background:

No established guidelines exist regarding the role of oral antibiotic therapy (OAT) to treat bloodstream infections (BSIs), and practices may vary depending on clinician specialty and experience.

Objective:

To assess practice patterns regarding oral antibiotic use for treatment of bacteremia in infectious diseases clinicians (IDCs, including physicians and pharmacists and trainees in these groups) and non–infectious diseases clinicians (NIDCs).

Design:

Open-access survey.

Participants:

Clinicians caring for hospitalized patients receiving antibiotics.

Methods:

An open-access, web-based survey was distributed to clinicians at a Midwestern academic medical center using e-mail and to clinicians outside the medical center using social media. Respondents answered questions regarding confidence prescribing OAT for BSI in different scenarios. We used χ2 analysis for categorical data evaluated association between responses and demographic groups.

Results:

Of 282 survey responses, 82.6% of respondents were physicians, 17.4% pharmacists, and IDCs represented 69.2% of all respondents. IDCs were more likely to select routine use of OAT for BSI due to gram-negative anaerobes (84.6% vs 59.8%; P < .0001), Klebsiella spp (84.5% vs 69.0%; P < .009), Proteus spp (83.6% vs 71.3%; P < .027), and other Enterobacterales (79.5% vs 60.9%; P < .004). Our survey results revealed significant differences in selected treatment of Staphylococcus aureus syndromes. Fewer IDCs than NIDCs selected OAT to complete treatment for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) BSI due to gluteal abscess (11.9% vs 25.6%; P = .012) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) BSI due to septic arthritis (13.9% vs 20.9%; P = .219).

Conclusions:

Practice variation and discordance with evidence for the use of OAT for BSIs exists among IDCs versus NIDCs, highlighting opportunities for education in both clinician groups.

Follow-up blood culture in Gram-negative bacilli bacteraemia: for whom is follow-up blood culture useful?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this narrative review is to examine available evidence about the diagnostic yielding of the follow-up blood cultures (FU-BCs) in patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infection (GN-BSI), the predictors of persistent GN-BSI, and the impact of the performance of FU-BCs on patient management and clinical outcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

The rate of persistent GN-BSI varies from 2.6% to 38.5%, with higher percentages in studies where FU-BCs were obtained from selected patients. Risk factors for persistent GN-BSI were analysed and prediction tools were proposed to guide physicians in the selection of patients. The impact of FU-BCs on patient management is still controversial as several authors have shown that this practice was associated with prolonged treatment duration and longer hospital stay. However, when adjusted for indication and survival bias, the performance of FU-BCs was a strong predictor of survival in large cohorts of hospitalized patients with GN-BSI. Favourable outcome seemed to be associated with higher rate of source control in GN-BSI patients managed with FU-BCs.

SUMMARY

The practice of FU-BCs in patients with GN-BSI should be individualised balancing cost/benefit ratio. The use of risk scores could be useful in selecting patients for whom FU-BCs are appropriate.

Shorter durations of antibiotic therapy in organ transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent evidence supports shorter courses of antibiotics for several common infections and prophylactic indications. Unfortunately, solid organ transplant patients are often underrepresented or excluded from these studies. As a result, prolonged antibiotic durations are often used in clinical practice despite a lack of demonstrable benefit. This paper reviews recent publications addressing antibiotic duration of therapy in SOT recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although largely limited to observational studies, longer courses of antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis, urinary tract infections, and bloodstream infections have not demonstrated benefit compared to shorter courses. In some instances, longer courses of therapy have been associated with harm (i.e., adverse drug events and development of resistance).

SUMMARY

Although the data remains limited, findings from retrospective studies evaluating shorter courses of antibiotics in SOT patients is encouraging. More robust research is desperately needed to define the optimal duration of antibiotics for common infections in SOT patients.

Impact of a laboratory developed phenotypic rapid susceptibility test directly from positive blood cultures on time to narrowest effective therapy in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia: a prospective randomized trial

Background

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is often needed prior to antimicrobial optimization for patients with gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSIs). Rapid AST (rAST) in combination with antimicrobial stewardship (AS) may decrease time to administration of narrower antibiotics.

Methods

This was a prospective, nonblinded, randomized trial evaluating the impact of a phenotypic rAST method vs conventional AST (cAST) in hospitalized patients with GN-BSI and source control. The primary outcome was time to narrowest effective therapy.

Results

Two hundred seventy-four patients were randomized and 205 underwent analysis (97 cAST, 108 rAST). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to susceptibility results was 23 hours shorter in the rAST group (cAST: 62 [59–67] hours vs rAST: 39 [IQR, 35–46] hours; P < .001). Median (IQR) time to narrowest effective therapy was similar between groups (cAST: 73 [44–138] hours vs rAST: 64 [42–92] hours; P = .10). Median (IQR) time to narrowest effective therapy was significantly shorter in a prespecified subgroup of patients not initially on narrowest therapy and during AS working hours (cAST: 93 [56–154] hours vs rAST: 62 [43–164] hours; P = .004). Significant decreases were observed in median (IQR) time to oral therapy (cAST: 126 [76–209] hours vs rAST: 91 [66–154] hours; P = .02) and median (IQR) length of hospital stay (cAST: 7 [4–13] days vs rAST: 5 [4–8] days; P = .04).

Conclusions

In patients with GN-BSI, rAST did not significantly decrease time to narrowest effective therapy but did decrease time to oral antibiotics and length of hospital stay. Rapid AST using existing microbiology platforms has potential to optimize patient outcomes.

Antibiotic stewardship in the era of precision medicine

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) continues to spread at an alarming rate worldwide. Novel approaches are needed to mitigate its deleterious impact on antibiotic efficacy. Antibiotic stewardship aims to promote the appropriate use of antibiotics through evidence-based interventions. One paradigm is precision medicine, a medical model in which decisions, practices, interventions, and therapies are adapted to the individual patient based on their predicted response or risk of disease. Precision medicine approaches hold promise as a way to improve outcomes for patients with myriad illnesses, including infections such as bacteraemia and pneumonia. This review describes the latest advances in precision medicine as they pertain to antibiotic stewardship, with an emphasis on hospital-based antibiotic stewardship programmes. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on AMR and antibiotic stewardship, gaps in the scientific evidence, and areas for further research are also discussed.

Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa)

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. The initial guidance document on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was published on 17 September 2020. Over the past year, there have been a number of important publications furthering our understanding of the management of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections, prompting a rereview of the literature and this updated guidance document.

METHODS

A panel of 6 infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections reviewed, updated, and expanded previously developed questions and recommendations about the treatment of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment recommendations are provided with accompanying rationales, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Recommendations apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of 24 October 2021. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/.

Use of Antimicrobials for Bloodstream Infections in the Intensive Care Unit, a Clinically Oriented Review

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) in critically ill patients are associated with significant mortality. For patients with septic shock, antibiotics should be administered within the hour. Probabilistic treatment should be targeted to the most likely pathogens, considering the source and risk factors for bacterial resistance including local epidemiology. Source control is a critical component of the management. Sending blood cultures (BCs) and other specimens before antibiotic administration, without delaying them, is key to microbiological diagnosis and subsequent opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship. Molecular rapid diagnostic testing may provide faster identification of pathogens and specific resistance patterns from the initial positive BC. Results allow for antibiotic optimisation, targeting the causative pathogen with escalation or de-escalation as required. Through this clinically oriented narrative review, we provide expert commentary for empirical and targeted antibiotic choice, including a review of the evidence and recommendations for the treatments of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing, AmpC-hyperproducing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; and Staphylococcus aureus. In order to improve clinical outcomes, dosing recommendations and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics specific to ICU patients must be followed, alongside therapeutic drug monitoring.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of AmpC β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. A previous guidance document focused on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Here, guidance is provided for treating AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-E), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.

METHODS

A panel of six infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections formulated questions about the treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections. Answers are presented as suggestions and corresponding rationales. In contrast to guidance in the previous document, published data on optimal treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections are limited. As such, guidance in this document is provided as "suggested approaches" based on clinical experience, expert opinion, and a review of the available literature. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment suggestions are provided, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Suggestions apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of September 17, 2021 and will be updated annually. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance-2.0/.