Overcoming Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Resistance for a More Rational Therapeutic Approach

Biofilm Eradication of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia by Levofloxacin and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a nonfermenting Gram-negative drug-resistant pathogen that causes healthcare-associated infections. Clinical isolates from Mexico were assessed for biofilm formation using crystal violet staining. Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated in planktonic and biofilm cells using the broth microdilution method. The effects of antibiotics on biofilms were visualized using fluorescence microscopy. Fifty isolates were included in this study, of which 14 (28%) were biofilm producers (9 [64%] from blood and 5 [36%] from respiratory samples). In planktonic cells 4/50 (8%) of isolates were resistant to levofloxacin (8.0%) and 22/50 (44%) were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. All isolates were resistant to levofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in biofilm cells. Bacterial biofilms treated with different concentrations of both antibiotics were completely disrupted. In conclusion, S. maltophilia isolated from blood had higher biofilm production than those isolated from respiratory samples. Biofilm production was associated with increased antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic monotherapy might not be the best course of action for the treatment of S. maltophilia infections in Mexico, because it might cause biofilm production and antimicrobial resistance.

Drug Resistance in Biofilm and Planktonic Cells of Achromobacter spp., Burkholderia spp., and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Clinical Isolates

Background: Biofilm production in nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria influences drug resistance. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of different antibiotics on biofilm eradication of clinical isolates of Achromobacter, Burkholderia, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Methods: Clinical isolates were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry in a third-level hospital in Monterrey, Mexico. Crystal violet staining was used to determine biofilm production. Drug susceptibility testing was determined by broth microdilution in planktonic cells and biofilm cells. Results: Resistance in planktonic cells was moderate to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and low to chloramphenicol, minocycline, levofloxacin (S. maltophilia and Burkholderia), ceftazidime, and meropenem (Burkholderia and Achromobacter). Biofilm eradication required higher drug concentrations of ceftazidime, chloramphenicol, levofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole than planktonic cells (p < 0.05). Levofloxacin showed biofilm eradication activity in S. maltophilia, minocycline and meropenem in Burkholderia, and meropenem in Achromobacter. Conclusions: Drug resistance increased due to biofilm production for some antibiotics, particularly ceftazidime and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for all three pathogens, chloramphenicol for S. maltophilia and Burkholderia, and levofloxacin for Burkholderia. Some antibiotics could be used for the treatment of biofilm-associated infections in our population, such as levofloxacin for S. maltophilia, minocycline and meropenem for Burkholderia, and meropenem for Achromobacter.

Characterization and genomic analysis of a lytic Stenotrophomonas maltophilia short-tailed phage A1432 revealed a new genus of the family Mesyanzhinovviridae

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) is an emerging opportunistic pathogen that exhibits resistant to a majority of commonly used antibiotics. Phages have the potential to serve as an alternative treatment for S. maltophilia infections. In this study, a lytic phage, A1432, infecting S. maltophilia YCR3A-1, was isolated and characterized from a karst cave. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that phage A1432 possesses an icosahedral head and a shorter tail. Phage A1432 demonstrated a narrow host range, with an optimal multiplicity of infection of 0.1. The one-step growth curve indicated a latent time of 10 min, a lysis period of 90 min, a burst size of 43.2 plaque-forming units per cell. In vitro bacteriolytic activity test showed that phage A1432 was capable to inhibit the growth of S. maltophilia YCR3A-1 in an MOI-dependent manner after 2 h of co-culture. BLASTn analysis showed that phage A1432 genome shares the highest similarity (81.46%) with Xanthomonas phage Xoo-sp2 in the NCBI database, while the query coverage was only 37%. The phage contains double-stranded DNA with a genome length of 61,660 bp and a GC content of 61.92%. It is predicted to have 79 open reading frames and one tRNA, with no virulence or antibiotic resistance genes. Phylogenetic analysis using terminase large subunit and DNA polymerase indicated that phage A1432 clustered with members of the Bradleyvirinae subfamily but diverged into a distinct branch. Further phylogenetic comparison analysis using Average Nucleotide Identity, proteomic phylogenetic analysis, genomic network analysis confirmed that phage A1432 belongs to a novel genus within the Bradleyvirinae subfamily, Mesyanzhinovviridae family. Additionally, phylogenetic analysis of the so far isolated S. maltophilia phages revealed significant genetic diversity among these phages. The results of this research will contribute valuable information for further studies on their morphological and genetic diversity, will aid in elucidating the evolutionary mechanisms that give rise to them.

Optimizing Antibiotic Therapy for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections in Critically Ill Patients: A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Approach

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic, multidrug-resistant non-fermentative Gram-negative bacillus, posing a significant challenge in clinical treatment due to its numerous intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms. This study aimed to evaluate the adequacy of antibiotics used for the treatment of S. maltophilia infections in critically ill patients using a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) approach. The antibiotics studied included cotrimoxazole, levofloxacin, minocycline, tigecycline, cefiderocol, and the new combination aztreonam/avibactam, which is not yet approved. By Monte Carlo simulations, the probability of target attainment (PTA), the PK/PD breakpoints, and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) were estimated. PK parameters and MIC distributions were sourced from the literature, the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), and the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program collection. Cefiderocol 2 g q8h, minocycline 200 mg q12h, tigecycline 100 mg q12h, and aztreonam/avibactam 1500/500 mg q6h were the best options to treat empirically infections due to S. maltophilia. Cotrimoxazole provided a higher probability of treatment success for the U.S. isolates than for European isolates. For all antibiotics, discrepancies between the PK/PD breakpoints and the clinical breakpoints defined by EUCAST (or the ECOFF) and CLSI were detected.

Global mapping of antibiotic resistance rates among clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are clinically important due to its intrinsic resistance to a broad range of antibiotics. Therefore, selecting the most appropriate antibiotic to treat S. maltophilia infection is a major challenge.

AIM

The current meta-analysis aimed to investigate the global prevalence of antibiotic resistance among S. maltophilia isolates to the develop more effective therapeutic strategies.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was performed using the appropriate search syntax after searching Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus databases (May 2023). Statistical analysis was performed using Pooled and the random effects model in R and the metafor package. A total of 11,438 articles were retrieved. After a thorough evaluation, 289 studies were finally eligible for inclusion in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESULT

Present analysis indicated that the highest incidences of resistance were associated with doripenem (97%), cefoxitin (96%), imipenem and cefuroxime (95%), ampicillin (94%), ceftriaxone (92%), aztreonam (91%) and meropenem (90%) which resistance to Carbapenems is intrinsic. The lowest resistance rates were documented for minocycline (3%), cefiderocol (4%). The global resistance rate to TMP-SMX remained constant in two periods before and after 2010 (14.4% vs. 14.6%). A significant increase in resistance to tigecycline and ceftolozane/tazobactam was observed before and after 2010.

CONCLUSIONS

Minocycline and cefiderocol can be considered the preferred treatment options due to low resistance rates, although regional differences in resistance rates to other antibiotics should be considered. The low global prevalence of resistance to TMP-SMX as a first-line treatment for S. maltophilia suggests that it remains an effective treatment option.

Prediction and characterization of prophages of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia reveals a remarkable phylogenetic diversity of prophages

Prophages, which enables bacterial hosts to acquire novel traits, and increase genetic variation and evolutionary innovation, are considered to be one of the greatest drivers of bacterial diversity and evolution. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is widely distributed and one of the most important multidrug resistant bacteria in hospitals. However, the distribution and genetic diversity of S. maltophilia prophages have not been elucidated. In this study, putative prophages were predicted in S. maltophilia genomes by using virus prediction tools, and the genetic diversity and phylogeny of S. maltophilia and the prophages they harbor were further analyzed. A total of 356 prophage regions were predicted from 88 S. maltophilia genomes. Among them, 144 were intact prophages, but 77.09% of the intact prophages did not match any known phage sequences in the public database. The number of prophage carried by S. maltophilia is related to its host habitat and is an important factor affecting the size of the host genome, but it is not related to the genetic diversity of the prophage. The prediction of auxiliary genes encoded by prophage showed that antibiotic resistance genes was not predicted for any of the prophages except for one questionable prophage, while 53 virulence genes and 169 carbohydrate active enzymes were predicted from 11.24 and 44.1% prophages, respectively. Most of the prophages (72.29%) mediated horizontal gene transfer of S. maltophilia genome, but only involved in 6.25% of the horizontal gene transfer events. In addition, CRISPR prediction indicated 97.75% S. maltophilia strains contained the CRISPR-Cas system containing 818 spacer sequences. However, these spacer sequences did not match any known S. maltophilia phages, and only a few S. maltophilia prophages. Comparative genomic analysis revealed a highly conserved and syntenic organization with genomic rearrangement between the prophages and the known related S. maltophilia phages. Our results indicate a high prevalence and genetic diversity of prophages in the genome of S. maltophilia, as well as the presence of a large number of uncharacterized phages. It provides an important complement to understanding the diversity and biological characteristics of phages, as well as the interactions and evolution between bacteria and phages.

Editorial for the Special Issue: "The Issue of Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens in Nosocomial Infections"

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global problem; in 2019, before the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it was responsible of more deaths than any other infectious diseases, including human immunodeficiency virus and malaria [...].

Intra-Abdominal Abscess and Bacteremia Due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia After Total Gastrectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) is increasingly recognized as a pathogen responsible for nosocomial infections, particularly in immunocompromised patients. The most common types of S. maltophilia infections are pneumonia and catheter-related bloodstream infection, and clinical cases of intra-abdominal abscesses due to S. maltophilia are rare. We present a rare case of intra-abdominal abscess and bacteremia as a surgical site infection (SSI) caused by S. maltophilia in a patient following total gastrectomy. We also reviewed previous literature to elucidate the clinical characteristics of intra-abdominal abscess due to S. maltophilia. The patient, a 75-year-old man with diabetes and polymyositis (treated with prednisolone), developed a fever 17 days after undergoing a total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Abdominal computed tomography revealed a hypodense solid mass at the esophagojejunostomy site, which appeared to be an intra-abdominal abscess. The culture of both blood and drained abscess pus confirmed only S. maltophilia. Treatment with intravenous trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and abscess drainage led to complete resolution. The patient recovered and was discharged and did not experience a recurrence. We reviewed the English literature and found only two additional case reports of intra-abdominal abscesses caused by S. maltophilia. As in our case, the intra-abdominal abscess occurred after abdominal surgery and the source was suspected to be deep SSI. This case highlights the importance of considering S. maltophilia as a potential pathogen in patients with atypical post-surgical abdominal infections. Physicians should be aware that S. maltophilia has the potential to cause intra-abdominal abscesses secondary to SSI, in addition to Enterobacteriaceae, a major causative pathogen of SSI. Further studies are required to elucidate the etiology, epidemiology, and risk factors for SSI caused by S. maltophilia.

Functional network analysis identifies multiple virulence and antibiotic resistance targets in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, an emerging multidrug-resistant opportunistic bacterium in humans is of major concern for immunocompromised individuals for causing pneumonia and bloodborne infections. This bacterial pathogen is associated with a considerable fatality/case ratio, with up to 100%, when presented as hemorrhagic fever. It is resistant to commonly used drugs as well as to antibiotic combinations. In-silico based functional network analysis is a key approach to get novel insights into virulence and resistance in pathogenic organisms. This study included the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis of 150 specific genes identified for antibiotic resistance mechanism and virulence pathways. Eight proteins, namely, PilL, FliA, Smlt2260, Smlt2267, CheW, Smlt2318, CheZ, and FliM were identified as hub proteins. Further docking studies of 58 selected phytochemicals were performed against the identified hub proteins. Deoxytubulosine and corosolic acid were found to be potent inhibitors of hub proteins of pathogenic S. maltophilia based on protein-ligand interactive study. Further pharmacophore studies are warranted with these molecules to develop them as novel antibiotics against S. maltophilia.

Dissemination and characterization of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates from Dairy Cows in Northeast China

This work investigated the genetic relationship among Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains in fecal samples from dairy cows in northeast China and identified the dominant β-lactamase genotype. One hundred and six samples were collected from two randomly selected cow farms in northeast China, and the isolates were identified with MALDI-TOF/MS. Whole-genome sequencing was conducted using Illumina HiSeq 4000-PE150 platform (Illumina, Inc., USA). The antimicrobial resistance genes were detected using CGE services. The phylogenetic analysis of S. maltophilia strains was performed by Roary and MEGA X. In total, 24 S. maltophilia isolates were isolated. The results of resistome analysis showed all S. maltophilia strains carrying bla L1 gene, which was the only β-lactamase genotype. In addition, the aminoglycoside resistance genes aac(6')-Iz and aph(3')-IIc were found. The phylogenetic tree indicated the clonal diversity of S. maltophilia in these two regions and the clonal relatedness of the strains from these regions. This study first investigated the dissemination and characterization of S. maltophilia isolates from dairy cows in northeast China and provided evidence of the potential transmission between two provinces. Furthermore, it indicated bla L1 was the most prevalent genotype of β-lactamase in these regions.

Steno-sphere: Navigating the enigmatic world of emerging multidrug-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen and frequent cause of serious nosocomial infections. Patient populations at greatest risk for these infections include the immunocompromised and those with chronic respiratory illnesses and prior antibiotic exposure, notably to carbapenems. Its complex virulence and resistance profile drastically limit available antibiotics, and incomplete breakpoint and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data to inform dose optimization further complicates therapeutic approaches. Clinical comparison data of first-line agents, including trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), quinolones, and minocycline, are limited to conflicting observational data with no clear benefit of a single agent or combination therapy. Newer antibiotic approaches, including cefiderocol and aztreonam- avibactam, are promising alternatives for extensively drug-resistant isolates; however, clinical outcomes data are needed. The potential clinical utility of bacteriophage for compassionate use in treating S. maltophilia infections remains to be determined since data is limited to in-vitro and sparse in-vivo work. This article provides a review of available literature for S. maltophilia infection management focused on related epidemiology, resistance mechanisms, identification, susceptibility testing, antimicrobial PK/PD, and emerging therapeutic strategies.

Cefiderocol Treatment for Severe Infections due to Difficult-to-Treat-Resistant Non-Fermentative Gram-Negative Bacilli in ICU Patients: A Case Series and Narrative Literature Review

Cefiderocol (FDC) is a siderophore cephalosporin now recognized as a new weapon in the treatment of difficult-to-treat-resistant (DTR) Gram-negative pathogens, including carbapenemase-producing enterobacterales and non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). This article reports our experience with an FDC-based regimen in the treatment of 16 extremely severe patients (invasive mechanical ventilation, 15/16; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, 9/16; and renal replacement therapy, 8/16) infected with DTR GNB. Our case series provides detailed insight into the pharmacokinetic profile and the microbiological data in real-life conditions. In the narrative review, we discuss the interest of FDC in the treatment of non-fermentative GNB in critically ill patients. We reviewed the microbiological spectrum, resistance mechanisms, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety profiles, and real-world evidence for FDC. On the basis of our experience and the available literature, we discuss the optimal FDC-based regimen, FDC dosage, and duration of therapy in critically ill patients with DTR non-fermentative GNB infections.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Efficacy of Available Treatments, with Critical Assessment of Novel Therapeutic Options

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SM) represents a challenging pathogen due to its resistance profile. A systematic review of the available evidence was conducted to evaluate the best treatment of SM infections to date, focusing on trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), fluoroquinolones (FQs), and tetracycline derivatives (TDs).

MATERIALS

PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception to 30 November 2022. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical failure, adverse events, and length of stay. A random effects meta-analysis was performed. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022321893).

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies, all retrospective, were included. A significant difference in terms of overall mortality was observed when comparing as a monotherapy TMP/SMX versus FQs (odds ratio (OR) 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.86, I² = 33%; 11 studies, 2407 patients). The prediction interval (PI) did not touch the no effect line (1.06-1.93), but the results were not robust for the unmeasured confounding (E-value for point estimate of 1.71). When comparing TMP/SMX with TDs, the former showed an association with higher mortality but not significant and with a wide PI (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.79-4.82, PI 0.01-685.99, I² = 0%; 3 studies, 346 patients). Monotherapies in general exerted a protective effect against death opposed to the combination regimens but were not significant (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.41-1.22, PI 0.16-3.08, I² = 0%; 4 studies, 438 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Against SM infections, FQs and, possibly, TDs seem to be reasonable alternative choices to TMP/SMX. Data from clinical trials are urgently needed to better inform therapeutic choices in this setting by also taking into account newer agents.

Appropriate antibiotic therapy is a predictor of outcome in patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia blood stream infection in the intensive care unit

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The study was to assess the relationship between antibiotic therapy and the outcome in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infection (BSI).

METHODS

ICU patients with monomicrobial S. maltophilia BSI from January 2004 to December 2019 were included and divided into two groups-those with- and without appropriate antibiotic therapy after BSI-for comparison. The primary outcome was the relationship between appropriate antibiotic therapy and 14-day mortality. The secondary outcome was the influence of different antibiotic therapies: levofloxacin- and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX)-containing regimens, on 14-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 214 ICU patients were included. Patients received appropriate antibiotic therapy (n = 133) after BSI had a lower 14-day mortality than those (n = 81) without appropriate antibiotic therapy (10.5% vs. 46.9%, p < 0.001). No difference on 14-day mortality between groups of patients by time of appropriate antibiotic therapy was observed (p > 0.05). After a propensity score matching, the results is consistent that 14-day mortality were lower in patients with appropriate antibiotic therapy than those without appropriate antibiotic therapy (11.5% vs. 39.3%, p < 0.001). Among patients with S. maltophilia BSI receiving appropriate antibiotic therapy, there was a trend levofloxacin-containing regimens is associated with lower mortality than TMP/SMX-containing regimens (HR 0.233, 95% CI 0.050-1.084, p = 0.063).

CONCLUSION

Appropriate antibiotic therapy was associated with decreased 14-day mortality in ICU patients with S. maltophilia BSI regardless of time. Levofloxacin-containing regimens may be better choice than TMP/SMX -containing regimens in treating ICU patients with S. maltophilia BSI.

Antibiofilm and antimicrobial activity of curcumin-chitosan nanocomplexes and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole on Achromobacter, Burkholderia, and Stenotrophomonas isolates

BACKGROUND

Non-fermenting Gram-negative Achromobacter xylosoxidans, Burkholderia cepacia complex, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia species cause healthcare-associated infections, often showing resistance to first-line drugs such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SXT). The aim of this study was to determine the effect of curcumin-chitosan nanocomplexes on biofilm-producing clinical isolates of non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli.

METHODS

A. xylosoxidans, B. cepacia complex, and S. maltophilia clinical isolates were identified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by broth microdilution. Curcumin (Cur), chitosan (Chi), and sodium tripolyphosphate (TPP) were encapsulated by ionotropic gelation in magnetic nanoparticles (MNP) and were assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR). Biofilm inhibition and eradication by Cur-Chi-TPP-MNP with TMP-SXT was assessed.

RESULTS

Cur-Chi-TPP-MNP in combination with TMP-SXT showed biofilm inhibition activity in A. xylosoxidans (37.5 µg/mL), B. cepacia (18.75 µg/mL), and S. maltophilia (4.69-18.75 µg/mL) and low biofilm eradication activity in all three strains (150 - 300 µg/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Cur-Chi-TPP-MNP in combination with TMP-SXT was able to inhibit biofilm and in lower effect to eradicate established biofilms of clinical isolates of A. xylosoxidans, B. cepacia complex, and S. maltophilia species. Our results highlight the need to assess these potential treatment options to be used clinically in biofilm-associated infections.

Activity of Delafloxacin and Levofloxacin against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia at Simulated Plasma and Intrapulmonary pH Values

Fluoroquinolones have become a popular treatment option for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. Although levofloxacin is most commonly used, delafloxacin demonstrates comparable in vitro activity when evaluated under standard susceptibility testing conditions at neutral pH. At acidic pH, the activity of the anionic delafloxacin is improved, while the activity of the zwitterionic levofloxacin is reduced. Because the human respiratory tract has a pH of ~6.6 and is the most common site of S. maltophilia infection, it is vital to understand the activity of these agents in this environment. Therefore, levofloxacin and delafloxacin were tested against clinical S. maltophilia isolates via broth microdilution testing (n = 37) and time-kill analysis (n = 5) in neutral cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) (pH 7.3) and acidic CAMHB (aCAMHB) (pH 6.5). In CAMHB, MIC50 values were similar between levofloxacin and delafloxacin (8 mg/L versus 8 mg/L). In aCAMHB, levofloxacin MICs did not change, while delafloxacin MICs decreased by a median of 4 log2 dilutions (MIC50 values of 8 mg/L versus 0.25 mg/L). In time-kill analyses, levofloxacin and delafloxacin at the maximum drug concentration for the free drug (fCmax) were bactericidal against 3 and 2 isolates in CAMHB, respectively. In aCAMHB, levofloxacin was not bactericidal against any isolate, while delafloxacin was bactericidal against the same 2 isolates. Relative to CAMHB, levofloxacin activity was reduced by 2.5 log10 CFU/mL in aCAMHB, whereas delafloxacin activity was increased 2.7 log10 CFU/mL. Although the bactericidal activity of levofloxacin against S. maltophilia was attenuated in an acidic environment in this study, the increased potency of delafloxacin at pH 6.5 did not translate into improved bactericidal activity in time-kill analyses, compared to pH 7.3. IMPORTANCE Stenotrophomonas maltophilia most often infects the lungs, where the physiologic environment is naturally slightly acidic (pH ~6.6), compared to most parts of the body (such as the bloodstream), which have neutral pH values (~7.4). Pneumonia due to S. maltophilia is often treated with the antibiotic levofloxacin, despite the activity of levofloxacin being known to be impaired at acidic pH. Unfortunately, currently available methods for susceptibility testing of levofloxacin against S. maltophilia are performed at a neutral pH and therefore may not accurately represent the activity of levofloxacin at the site of infection in the lungs. A similar but newer antibiotic in the same class as levofloxacin, namely, delafloxacin, is not affected by being in an acidic environment and may actually work better at lower pH values. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether one drug might be better than the other in this setting by testing each agent's ability to kill S. maltophilia at pH 7.3 and pH 6.5. These findings could then be used to design confirmatory studies that may ultimately impact which drug is given to patients with lung infections due to S. maltophilia.