Intravenous Tigecycline Facilitates Cure of Severe Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) After Failure of Standard Therapy: A Case Report and Literature Review of Tigecycline Use in CDI

Toxin inhibition: Examining tetracyclines, clindamycin, and linezolid

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to discuss the role of toxin inhibition in select infections and to provide recommendations for appropriate antimicrobial selection when toxin inhibition is indicated.

SUMMARY

For select organisms, specifically Clostridioides difficile, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus pyogenes, toxin production plays an integral role in overall disease pathogenesis and progression. Some expert recommendations include utilization of an antimicrobial with toxin inhibition properties as primary or adjunctive therapy for certain infections due to these organisms, but evolving data have made the choice of antitoxin agent less clear. Clindamycin has been the long-standing standard of care agent for toxin inhibition in necrotizing S. aureus and S. pyogenes infections, but linezolid shows promise as an alternative either in the setting of drug shortages or simply when clindamycin is not optimal, while tetracyclines require further study for this indication. The role for adjunctive toxin inhibition in C. difficile infection (CDI) is less defined, as current first-line therapies already have antitoxin properties.

CONCLUSION

Toxin inhibition plays a key role in successful management of patients with infections due to toxin-producing organisms. Adjunctive therapy with a tetracycline could be considered in severe, fulminant CDI, but the associated benefit is variable. The benefit of antitoxin treatment for necrotizing S. aureus and S. pyogenes has been more consistently documented. Recent studies support linezolid as an alternative to clindamycin as an adjunctive S. aureus treatment or as monotherapy when appropriate.

Impact of Tigecycline on C. difficile Outcomes: Case Series and Propensity-Matched Retrospective Study

This case series and propensity-matched cohort study on the use of tigecycline in Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) evaluated the effect of tigecycline on 30-day mortality. Adjusted for ATLAS Score, hypotension, treatment time period, and serum lactate, tigecycline did not significantly improve 30-day mortality (odds ratio: 0.89; 95% confidence interval: 0.25–3.12; P = 0.853). A randomized controlled trial is needed to determine efficacy and safety of tigecycline in severe or refractory CDI.

Diagnostic and therapy of severe Clostridioides difficile infections in the ICU

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of the review is to provide all the recent data focusing on the diagnostic and treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection in patients admitted in the ICU.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the ICU, diagnosis remains complicated with a large number of alternative diagnosis. The treatment classically relies on vancomycin but fidaxomicin and fecal microbiota transplantation are now potential solutions in selected indications.

SUMMARY

Data on ICU-related CDI remain limited and conflicting. To date, there is no unique and simple way to obtain a diagnosis for CDI, the combination of clinical signs and a two-step testing algorithm remains the recommended gold-standard. Two molecules can be proposed for first line treatment: vancomycin and fidaxomicin. Although metronidazole may still be discussed as a treatment option for mild CDI in low-risk patients, its use for ICU-patients does not seem reasonable. Several reports suggest that fecal microbiota transplantation could be discussed, as it is well tolerated and associated with a high rate of clinical cure. CDI is a dynamic and active area of research with new diagnostic techniques, molecules, and management concepts likely changing our approach to this old disease in the near future.

Prevention and Treatment of Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Clostridium difficile infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Risk factors in this population include frequent hospitalizations, receipt of immunosuppressive agents, and intestinal dysbiosis triggered by several factors, including exposure to broad-spectrum antimicrobials. The incidence and potential for significant adverse outcomes among solid organ transplant recipients with C difficile infection highlight the evolving need for strategic C difficile infection risk factor modification and novel approaches to disease management in this patient population. This review focuses on current concepts related to the prevention and treatment of C difficile infection in solid organ transplant recipients.

Clinical review of Clostridium difficile infection: an update on treatment and prevention

INTRODUCTION

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has become a significant healthcare-associated infection and is strongly associated with antibiotic use. Practice guidelines have recently been revised incorporating updated recommendations for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses updated aspects of CDI management. New and emerging pharmacologic options for treatment and prevention are reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Metronidazole is associated with lower rates of treatment success compared to vancomycin and should no longer be used as primary therapy for the first episode of CDI or recurrent disease. Vancomycin or fidaxomicin are now recommended for first-line therapy for most cases of CDI. Fecal microbiota transplant is effective and safe for the treatment of recurrent CDI. Evidence supports the use of fidaxomicin and bezlotoxumab for prevention of recurrent CDI; however, the costs associated with these therapies may limit their use. Validated risk prediction tools are needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from these treatments. Future advancements in microbiota targeting treatments will emerge as promising alternatives to standard CDI treatments. Antibiotic stewardship and infection control measures will remain essential components for CDI management.

The outcome of patients with severe and severe-complicated Clostridium difficile infection treated with tigecycline combination therapy: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Tigecycline is a third-line therapy for severe Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Australasian guidelines. Differences in strain types make it difficult to extrapolate international tigecycline efficacy data with combination or monotherapy to Australian practice, where experience is limited.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects associated with tigecycline combination therapy for severe and severe-complicated CDI in an Australian healthcare setting.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study at a metropolitan university-affiliated hospital. All patients between February 2013 and October 2016 treated with adjunctive intravenous tigecycline for >48 h for severe or severe-complicated CDI were included. Tigecycline was given in addition to oral vancomycin ± intravenous metronidazole. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days from start of tigecycline combination therapy. Secondary outcomes included clinical cure, colectomy, adverse events and recurrence rates.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients with median age of 61 years had severe (n = 9) or severe-complicated (n = 4) CDI at tigecycline commencement. In 92% of patients, tigecycline started within 48 h after in-hospital CDI treatment, for median duration of 9 days. All-cause mortality at 30 days was 8% with no mortality in severe CDI and 25% (1/4) in patients with severe-complicated fulminant CDI, comparing favourably with historical rates of 9-38% and 30-80% in similar respective groups. Clinical cure was achieved in 77% of cases. There were no colectomies and one attributable tigecycline adverse reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Tigecycline appears safe and effective as a part of combination therapy in severe CDI, and may be given earlier and for shorter durations than in current guidelines.

Novel Antimicrobials for the Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection

The current picture of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is alarming with a mortality rate ranging between 3% and 15% and a CDI recurrence rate ranging from 12% to 40%. Despite the great efforts made over the past 10 years to face the CDI burden, there are still gray areas in our knowledge on CDI management. The traditional anti-CDI antimicrobials are not always adequate in addressing the current needs in CDI management. The aim of our review is to give an update on novel antimicrobials for the treatment of CDI, considering the currently available evidences on their efficacy, safety, molecular mechanism of action, and their probability to be successfully introduced into the clinical practice in the near future. We identified, through a PubMed search, 16 novel antimicrobial molecules under study for CDI treatment: cadazolid, surotomycin, ridinilazole, LFF571, ramoplanin, CRS3123, fusidic acid, nitazoxanide, rifampin, rifaximin, tigecycline, auranofin, NVB302, thuricin CD, lacticin 3147, and acyldepsipeptide antimicrobials. In comparison with the traditional anti-CDI antimicrobial treatment, some of the novel antimicrobials reviewed in this study offer several advantages, i.e., the favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, the narrow-spectrum activity against CD that implicates a low impact on the gut microbiota composition, the inhibitory activity on CD sporulation and toxins production. Among these novel antimicrobials, the most active compounds in reducing spore production are cadazolid, ridinilazole, CRS3123, ramoplanin and, potentially, the acyldepsipeptide antimicrobials. These antimicrobials may potentially reduce CD environment spread and persistence, thus reducing CDI healthcare-associated acquisition. However, some of them, i.e., surotomycin, fusidic acid, etc., will not be available due to lack of superiority versus standard of treatment. The most CD narrow-spectrum novel antimicrobials that allow to preserve microbiota integrity are cadazolid, ridinilazole, auranofin, and thuricin CD. In conclusion, the novel antimicrobial molecules under development for CDI have promising key features and advancements in comparison to the traditional anti-CDI antimicrobials. In the near future, some of these new molecules might be effective alternatives to fight CDI.

A Review of Experimental and Off-Label Therapies for Clostridium difficile Infection

In spite of increased awareness and the efforts taken to optimize Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) management, with the limited number of currently available antibiotics for C. difficile the halt of this increasing epidemic remains out of reach. There are, however, close to 80 alternative treatment methods with controversial anti-clostridial efficacy or in experimental phase today. Indeed, some of these therapies are expected to become acknowledged members of the recommended anti-CDI arsenal within the next few years. None of these alternative treatment methods can respond in itself to all the major challenges of CDI management, which are primary prophylaxis in the susceptible population, clinical cure of severe cases, prevention of recurrences, and forestallment of asymptomatic C. difficile carriage and in-hospital spread. Yet, the greater the variety of treatment choices on hand, the better combination strategies can be developed to reach these goals in the future. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive summary of these experimental and currently off-label therapeutic options.

Does Adjunctive Tigecycline Improve Outcomes in Severe-Complicated, Nonoperative Clostridium difficile Infection?

Severe Clostridium difficile infection is associated with a high rate of mortality; however, the optimal treatment for severe- complicated infection remains uncertain for patients who are not candidates for surgical intervention. Thus, we sought to evaluate the benefit of adjunctive tigecycline in this patient population using a retrospective cohort adjusted for propensity to receive tigecycline. We found that patients who received tigecycline had similar outcomes to those who did not, although the small sample size limited power to adjust for comorbidities and severity of illness.