Switching Tenofovir/Emtricitabine/Efavirenz (TDF/FTC/EFV) to TDF/FTC/Rilpivirine vs Continuing TDF/FTC/EFV in HIV-Infected Patients With Virological Suppression: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Common antiretroviral combinations are associated with somatic depressive symptoms in women with HIV

OBJECTIVE

While modern antiretroviral therapy (ART) is highly effective and safe, depressive symptoms have been associated with certain ART drugs. We examined the association between common ART regimens and depressive symptoms in women with HIV (WWH) with a focus on somatic vs. nonsomatic symptoms.

DESIGN

Analysis of longitudinal data from the Women's Interagency HIV Study.

METHODS

Participants were classified into three groups based on the frequency of positive depression screening (CES-D ≥16): chronic depression (≥50% of visits since study enrollment), infrequent depression (<50% of visits), and never depressed (no visits). Novel Bayesian machine learning methods building upon a subset-tree kernel approach were developed to estimate the combined effects of ART regimens on depressive symptoms in each group after covariate adjustment.

RESULTS

The analysis included 1538 WWH who participated in 12 924 (mean = 8.4) visits. The mean age was 49.9 years, 72% were Black, and 14% Hispanic. In the chronic depression group, combinations including tenofovir alafenamide and cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir and/or darunavir were associated with greater somatic symptoms of depression, whereas those combinations containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and efavirenz or rilpivirine were associated with less somatic depressive symptoms. ART was not associated with somatic symptoms in the infrequent depression or never depressed groups. ART regimens were not associated with nonsomatic symptoms in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific ART combinations are associated with somatic depressive symptoms in WWH with chronic depression. Future studies should consider specific depressive symptoms domains as well as complete drug combinations when assessing the relationship between ART and depression.

Long-Term Effectiveness of Rilpivirine-Based Single-Tablet Regimens in a Seven-Year, Two-Center Observational Cohort of People Living with HIV

Data on the long-term durability of rilpivirine (RPV) are still scarce. A two-center retrospective study was performed, including all people living with HIV (PLWH) treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC)/RPV or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)/FTC/RPV in the period January 2013-December 2019. Aims of the study were to assess the rate of discontinuation of the RPV single-tablet regimen (STR) and identify factors associated with the risk of discontinuation according to Cox's regression analysis. A total of 684 PLWH were enrolled. Mean duration of RPV-STR treatment was 192.5 (±99.5) weeks for 123 antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve participants (18%) and 173.3 (± 85.6) weeks for 561 ART-experienced study participants (82%). During the study period, the incidence of discontinuation was 7.7 per 100 person-years. The estimated proportions of discontinuation after 48 and 96 weeks were 5.6% and 13.4%, respectively. Causes of discontinuation were loss to follow-up (30%), side effects (15%), ART optimization (14%), virological failure (VF) (12%), death or transfer to another center (9%), low adherence (7%), drug interactions (6%), simplification to dual therapy (3%), and unknown (3%). No differences were observed in cumulative probability of discontinuation between ART-naïve and -experienced PLWH. Heterosexual (hazard ratio [HR] 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-6.8) and mother-to-child (HR 5.3, 95% CI 1.8-15.3) transmission of HIV infection and history of previous VF (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.5) were associated with higher risk of discontinuation. High RPV-STR effectiveness and durability were confirmed in our real-life population of PLWH. Given these data, RPV has the potential to be a drug for life in patients selected according to current guidelines.

Use of rilpivirine in HIV-1-infected individuals in routine clinical practice from 2012 to 2017 in France

OBJECTIVES

We assessed virological outcomes of rilpivirine use in France from 2012 to 2017, in three groups of people living with HIV (PLHIV): (i) antiretroviral (ARV)-naive PLHIV; (ii) ARV-experienced PLHIV switching to rilpivirine while failing therapy; and (iii) ARV-experienced PLHIV switching to rilpivirine while virologically controlled.

METHODS

Virological success (VS) was defined as a plasma HIV-1 viral load (VL) <50 copies/mL and virological failure (VF) as two consecutive VL >50 copies/mL or one VL >50 copies/mL followed by a treatment switch prior to the next VL measurement. The cumulative incidence of VS was assessed considering rilpivirine discontinuation, loss to follow-up and death as competing risks, while estimates of cumulative incidence of VF accounted for loss to follow-up and death.

RESULTS

Among the 2166 ARV-naive PLHIV initiating rilpivirine, the 4 year cumulative incidence of VS was 91.0% and was associated with baseline VL. Among the 2125 ARV-experienced PLHIV switching to rilpivirine while failing therapy, the 4 year cumulative incidence of VS was 82.5% and was associated with lower VL, higher CD4 and less than three prior ARVs. Among the 11 828 ARV-experienced PLHIV switching to rilpivirine while virologically controlled, the 4 year cumulative incidence of VF was 9.6%. The risk of VF was lower among MSM, for PLHIV with CD4 ≥ 500 cell/mm3, without a prior AIDS event, or with a longer VL suppression at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Rilpivirine-containing regimens yielded high rates of viral suppression in most participants, while it was ineffective when used outside the marketing authorization in naive participants.